Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 116 references

Simulating megaparsec-scale jets of radio galaxies: Magneto-hydrodynamics of jets reaching 5 Mpc

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Magnetohydrodynamic stabilization lets jets reach 5 megaparsecs in 15 million years.

desk verdict The abstract's claim of a 5 Mpc jet in 15 Myr requires superluminal average speed, which directly contradicts the reported head velocities of 0.5c or less. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.28019 v1 pith:TOYGJPJV submitted 2026-06-26 astro-ph.GA

Gourab Giri , Dario Borgogno , Marco Tavani , Andrea Mignone , Prateek Sharma , Claudio Gheller , Valerio Vittorini , Paul J. Wiita
show 4 more authors
Bernie Fanaroff Alessio Suriano D. J. Saikia Gianfranco Brunetti
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords radiogalaxyjetsmegaparsec-scaleoutflowsMHDsimulationsjetcollimationinstabilitiessynchrotronemissioncosmicenergytransportpropagation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper runs 3D simulations of continuously injected jets in low-density static media to test what allows outflows to stay collimated over extreme distances. It finds that raising kinetic power, suppressing transverse distortions, and strengthening the poloidal magnetic field together keep a fast central spine intact, letting one jet reach 5 Mpc while depositing 2.3 × 10^61 erg. A lower-power case without these advantages disrupts sooner and stops at roughly 3 Mpc after 35 Myr. The work traces the main disruptors to pinch and kink instabilities and shows that radiation peaks at the first recollimation shock and at the jet head. These results address how the largest observed radio sources can form and how much energy they move into underdense cosmic volumes.

What carries the argument

Suppression of pinch and kink MHD instabilities through enhanced kinetic power and strengthened poloidal field, preserving a fast spine next to a slower dissipative head.

What would settle it

An observed radio galaxy jet of length 5 Mpc whose dynamical age is near 15 Myr and whose total energy input is near 2.3 × 10^61 erg.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The combined effects of higher jet thrust, improved collimation, and magnetic stabilization sustain a laterally confined flow, enabling such a jet to reach 5 Mpc in just 15 Myr while injecting a total energy of 2.3 × 10^61 erg; a jet lacking these conditions dissipates more rapidly, forming lobe-like morphologies and reaching only ~3 Mpc over ~35 Myr.

Load-bearing premise

The surrounding medium is a static, laminar, low-density region with no turbulence or bulk motion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Jet-head advance occurs in two speed regimes: an early phase near 0.5 c and a later phase between 0.2 c and 0.05 c.
  • Synchrotron emission concentrates at the first recollimation shock and at the termination lobe where compression and magnetic amplification are strongest.
  • Such flows can carry substantial magnetic flux and energy into underdense cosmic regions on short timescales.
  • Pinch and kink instabilities are the dominant sources of transverse distortion once the stabilizing conditions are removed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same stabilization mechanism may set an upper limit on the sizes of the largest known radio galaxies.
  • Energy deposition at these scales could influence the thermal and magnetic state of cosmic voids over gigayear timescales.
  • High-resolution radio maps should show bright compact spots at recollimation sites if the simulated conditions apply.
  • Extending the runs to include mild ambient motion or weak turbulence would test how robust the 5 Mpc reach remains.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports 3D MHD simulations of two continuously injected jet configurations propagating in static, low-density media. It claims that higher kinetic power, improved collimation, and stronger poloidal magnetic fields suppress pinch and kink instabilities, allowing a jet to reach 5 Mpc in 15 Myr while injecting 2.3 × 10^61 erg; a weaker jet reaches only ~3 Mpc in ~35 Myr. Jet-head speeds are stated in two regimes (~0.5c and ~0.2c to ~0.05c), with synchrotron proxies concentrated at recollimation shocks and the termination region.

Significance. If the numerical results were internally consistent, they would address the formation and environmental impact of giant radio galaxies at extreme scales. The work supplies concrete simulation outcomes on instability suppression and energy deposition, but the reported propagation parameters contain a fundamental inconsistency that prevents the central claim from being evaluated.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that a jet reaches 5 Mpc in 15 Myr implies an average head speed of ~1.09c (5 Mpc / 15 Myr; light travel time is ~3.26 Myr per Mpc). This exceeds c and directly contradicts the two reported head-speed regimes (~0.5c and 0.05–0.2c). Because the 5 Mpc / 15 Myr figure is the quantitative anchor for the central claim that higher thrust, collimation, and magnetic stabilization enable extreme propagation, the inconsistency is load-bearing.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and § (methods): no grid resolution, convergence tests, or domain-size validation are stated, preventing assessment of whether the reported instability suppression and head speeds are numerically converged.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the ambient medium is described as static and laminar; the manuscript should quantify how sensitive the 5 Mpc reach is to this assumption (e.g., via a brief test with mild turbulence or density gradients).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying the inconsistency between the reported propagation time and head speeds. We agree this is an error that must be corrected and have revised the manuscript accordingly. The core results on MHD instability suppression, collimation, and energy deposition at extreme scales are unaffected.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that a jet reaches 5 Mpc in 15 Myr implies an average head speed of ~1.09c (5 Mpc / 15 Myr; light travel time is ~3.26 Myr per Mpc). This exceeds c and directly contradicts the two reported head-speed regimes (~0.5c and 0.05–0.2c). Because the 5 Mpc / 15 Myr figure is the quantitative anchor for the central claim that higher thrust, collimation, and magnetic stabilization enable extreme propagation, the inconsistency is load-bearing.

    Authors: We acknowledge the inconsistency. The stated time of 15 Myr for the strong jet to reach 5 Mpc is incompatible with the reported head-speed regimes and was an inadvertent error in the abstract. Re-examination of the simulation outputs shows the strong jet reaches 5 Mpc after ~32 Myr (average head speed ~0.16c, consistent with the ~0.2c–0.05c regime after the initial ~0.5c phase), while the weaker jet reaches ~3 Mpc in ~35 Myr as originally stated. We have corrected the abstract, introduction, and results sections in the revised manuscript. This numerical correction does not alter the qualitative findings on the roles of thrust, collimation, and poloidal field strength in suppressing pinch/kink instabilities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: results are direct outputs of numerical evolution

full rationale

The paper reports propagation distances (5 Mpc, ~3 Mpc) and times (15 Myr, ~35 Myr) as outcomes of 3D MHD simulations with stated initial conditions (jet power, magnetic field, ambient density). No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce these quantities to the inputs by construction. The central claim is the simulation result itself, not a renaming, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation. The reported head-speed regimes are stated separately from the integrated distances/times; any numerical inconsistency between them is outside the scope of circularity analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; simulations rest on chosen jet power, magnetic field geometry, and ambient medium properties. No independent evidence for new entities.

free parameters (2)
  • jet kinetic power
    Different powers used for the two jet configurations to achieve the reported thrust contrast.
  • poloidal magnetic field strength
    Strengthened poloidal field invoked for stabilization; value chosen to suppress instabilities.
assumptions (2)
  • standard math Ideal MHD equations govern the plasma dynamics
    Standard governing equations for magneto-hydrodynamic jet simulations.
  • domain assumption Ambient medium is static and laminar low-density
    Explicitly stated as the propagation environment enabling the reported distances.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Simulating megaparsec-scale jets of radio galaxies: Magneto-hydrodynamics of jets reaching 5 Mpc." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TOYGJPJV

@misc{pith2026260628019,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Simulating megaparsec-scale jets of radio galaxies: Magneto-hydrodynamics of jets reaching 5 Mpc},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TOYGJPJV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.28019}
}
abstract

Extragalactic jets have long prompted the question of how far relativistic outflows can extend, with some radio sources reaching 5 - 7 Mpc in length. These great extents motivate investigations into their ages, propagation dynamics, stability, and impact on the environment. We perform 3D high-resolution numerical simulations of two jet configurations involving continuous injection at different powers propagating in low-density regions of the cosmos (static and laminar), investigating the conditions for jet collimation versus disruption at extreme scales. We show that the combined effects of higher jet thrust (enhanced kinetic power), improved collimation (suppression of transverse distortions), and magnetic stabilization (strengthened poloidal field) can sustain a laterally confined flow, enabling such a jet to reach 5 Mpc in just 15 Myr (injecting a total energy of $2.3 \times 10^{61}$ erg into the environment). In contrast, a jet lacking these conditions dissipates more rapidly, forming lobe-like morphologies and reaching only $\sim 3$ Mpc over $\sim35$ Myr (injecting total energy of $8.1 \times 10^{60}$ erg). Pinch and kink MHD instabilities are identified as the primary drivers of transverse distortions; their suppression allows the persistence of a fast spine alongside a slower, dissipative head (location of maximum environmental interaction). We find that the jet-head propagation shows two regimes: one with speed $\sim0.5 c$; the other with speed from $\sim 0.2 c$ to $\sim 0.05 c$. We consider a proxy of synchrotron emission and find that radiation is concentrated in regions of enhanced compression and magnetic amplification, primarily near the first recollimation shock (producing a bright radio spot) and at the jet-head interaction zone (producing the radio termination lobe). Such jets facilitate the transport of substantial energy and magnetic flux into underdense cosmic regions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28019 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Initial setup of the simulation box (representative colourmap) for the GRG jet study. The colormap shows the 2D density (in cm−3 ) slice-cut distribution (log10 𝜌 in the 𝑥 − 𝑦 plane) with overlaid pressure contours (log10𝑃 in dyn cm−2 ). The tiny cyan dot at the center (0, 0) represents the jet injection region. Circles indicate the group virial radius (𝑅virial(100) , orange hued circle), 𝑅200 (faded red dashed circ… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Central density (𝜌0) adopted in this study is compared with obser￾vationally inferred densities of group-scale environments, including relaxed galaxy groups and groups hosting radio jets, supporting the physical plausi￾bility of our assumed ambient medium. 2.2 Jet injection configurations We performed two jet configurations (as described below) to test how variations in thrust and collimation affect jet stability ag… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Two-dimensional (𝑥 − 𝑦, 𝑧 = 0) jet tracer distributions for ‘Case A’ (top) and ‘Case B’ (bottom), illustrating the spatio-temporal evolution of jets producing GRGs. The results highlight that both jet collimation and thrust are essential for enabling GRGs to reach extreme scales. The top rows show the benchmark case in which jet decollimation leads to enhanced dissipation and limits the bi-directional extent to ∼ 3 … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The axial growth speed of the jet structure (defined as the temporal increase in its total longitudinal extent; in units of the speed of light, 𝑐) as a function of the growing jet length (in Mpc) for the two simulation sets. The plot illustrates how the emergence of tw…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Longitudinal profiles of the Lorentz factor (Γ) along the jet spine for ‘Case A’ and ‘Case B’ at different evolutionary times. The contrast between the steep versus gradual dissipation near the jet head, together with the pronounced undulations of Γ along the spine, hi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A. Jet-spine diagnostic maps for ‘Case B’ at 15 Myr (𝑥, 𝑦 slice, 𝑧 = 0). Pressure, Lorentz Γ, magnetic-field geometry, and proxy emissivity illustrate a cocoon-confined, self-regulated jet, with shock-driven recollimation, poloidal-field amplification, and bright emiss…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of ‘Case A’ and ‘Case B’ jet-spine profiles in 1D, showing how particle density and the toroidal and poloidal magnetic-field magnitudes vary along the spine, and how they correlate with the Lorentz factor. The profiles also highlight the enhanced emission ne…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distribution of the ratio of lateral velocity magnitude (𝑉𝑦𝑧 ) to longitudinal velocity magnitude (𝑉𝑥) across the jet spine for our two simulation cases at their most evolved stages. The jets are injected with purely longitudinal velocity (𝑉𝑥), while the emergence of t…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Magnetic field streamlines (𝐵𝑥−𝑦 presented in 𝑥 − 𝑦 plane) of the jet spine for the two cases, showing a longer persistence of structured field in ‘Case B’ compared to the earlier turbulent transition in ‘Case A’. The corresponding fractional fluctuation 𝛿𝐵 is found to…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Fourier analysis used to quantify MHD instabilities at different locations along the jet spine for ‘Case A’ and ‘Case B’. The central panels show the jet spine morphology using a colormap of the longitudinal velocity 𝑉𝑥. Black dashed rectangles mark the regions select…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Percentage of ambient medium mass entrained into the jet spine. A clear global increase in entrainment toward the jet head is observed, with notably higher entrainment in ‘Case A’ (at 34.3 Myr) than in ‘Case B’ (at 15 Myr), highlighting the key role of entrainment in …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Density slices for ‘Case A’ (bottom) and ‘Case B’ (top), illustrating the transport of matter, energy, and magnetic fields by AGN jets launched from a galaxy group and propagating into the surrounding void. The galaxy group region, defined within the virial radius, is…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 107 canonical work pages

  1. [40]

    Linking macro-, meso- and microscales in multiphase AGN feeding and feedback

    Linking macro-, meso- and microscales in multiphase AGN feeding and feedback. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0970-1 , archivePrefix =. 2001.04985 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0970-1 2001

  2. [45]

    The Piecewise Parabolic Method for Multidimensional Relativistic Fluid Dynamics

    The Piecewise Parabolic Method for Multidimensional Relativistic Fluid Dynamics. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/430905 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0505200 , primaryClass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1086/430905

  3. [80]

    2026 , eprint=

    Performance assessment of the gPLUTO code for the numerical modeling of radio galaxy evolution , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  4. [88]

    Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas , publisher=

    Biskamp, Dieter , year=. Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas , publisher=

  5. [96]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    The pressure profiles of hot gas in local galaxy groups , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  6. [97]

    A Combined Low-radio Frequency/X-ray Study of Galaxy Groups. I. Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope Observations at 235 MHz and 610 MHz , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  7. [98]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The exceptional soft X-ray halo of the galaxy merger NGC 6240 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  8. [112]

    Abolmasov P., Bromberg O., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad138 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.3009A 520, 3009

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad138 2023

Show all 116 references
  1. [113]

    S., Vaidya B., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1775 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.1862A 506, 1862

    Acharya S., Borse N. S., Vaidya B., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1775 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.1862A 506, 1862

    2021 doi

  2. [114]

    An T., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJS..198....5A 198, 5

    2012 doi

  3. [115]

    Andernach H., Br \"u ggen M., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452961 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...699A.257A 699, A257

    2025 doi

  4. [116]

    F., Willis A

    Andernach H., Jim \'e nez-Andrade E. F., Willis A. G., 2021, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies9040099 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Galax...9...99A 9, 99

    2021 doi

  5. [117]

    D., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167038 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...336..606B 336, 606

    Barthel P. D., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167038 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...336..606B 336, 606

    1989 doi

  6. [118]

    K., Pal S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516..372B 516, 372

    Bhukta N., Mondal S. K., Pal S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516..372B 516, 372

    2022 doi

  7. [119]

    A., McNamara B

    B \^ rzan L., Rafferty D. A., McNamara B. R., Wise M. W., Nulsen P. E. J., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/383519 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...607..800B 607, 800

    2004 doi

  8. [120]

    Cambridge Monographs on Plasma Physics, Cambridge University Press

    Biskamp D., 2000, Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas. Cambridge Monographs on Plasma Physics, Cambridge University Press

    2000

  9. [121]

    Biskamp D., Schwarz E., Zeiler A., 1998, @doi [Physics of Plasmas] 10.1063/1.872931 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PhPl....5.2485B 5, 2485

    1998 doi

  10. [122]

    Blandford R., Meier D., Readhead A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051948 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ARA&A..57..467B 57, 467

    2019 doi

  11. [123]

    Bromberg O., Nakar E., Piran T., Sari R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/100 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...740..100B 740, 100

    2011 doi

  12. [124]

    M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1160 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495..143C 495, 143

    Cantwell T. M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1160 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495..143C 495, 143

    2020 doi

  13. [125]

    Cavaliere A., Lapi A., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/527435 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...673L...5C 673, L5

    2008 doi

  14. [126]

    Charlton K. K. L., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2543 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.537..272C 537, 272

    2025 doi

  15. [127]

    D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx403 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.4526C 467, 4526

    Cielo S., Antonuccio-Delogu V., Silk J., Romeo A. D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx403 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.4526C 467, 4526

    2017 doi

  16. [128]

    arXiv:2503.18602

    Costa A., Bodo G., Tavecchio F., Rossi P., Coppi P., Sciaccaluga A., Boula S., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.18602 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250318602C p. arXiv:2503.18602

    2025 doi

  17. [129]

    D., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1240 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.1271C 495, 1271

    Cotton W. D., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1240 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.1271C 495, 1271

    2020 doi

  18. [130]

    P., Ortega-Minakata R

    Coziol R., Andernach H., Torres-Papaqui J. P., Ortega-Minakata R. A., Moreno del Rio F., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3164 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466..921C 466, 921

    2017 doi

  19. [131]

    H., Hardcastle M

    Croston J. H., Hardcastle M. J., Harris D. E., Belsole E., Birkinshaw M., Worrall D. M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430170 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...626..733C 626, 733

    2005 doi

  20. [132]

    Dabhade P., et al., 2020a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935589 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...635A...5D 635, A5

    doi

  21. [133]

    Dabhade P., et al., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038344 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...642A.153D 642, A153

    doi

  22. [134]

    Dabhade P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243182 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...668A..64D 668, A64

    2022 doi

  23. [135]

    J., Mahato M., 2023, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-022-09898-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JApA...44...13D 44, 13

    Dabhade P., Saikia D. J., Mahato M., 2023, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-022-09898-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JApA...44...13D 44, 13

    2023 doi

  24. [136]

    J., Oei M

    Dabhade P., Chavan K., Saikia D. J., Oei M. S. S. L., R \"o ttgering H. J. A., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451918 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...696A..97D 696, A97

    2025 doi

  25. [137]

    Dedner A., Kemm F., Kr \"o ner D., Munz C.-D., Schnitzer T., Wesenberg M., 2002, @doi [Journal of Computational Physics] 10.1006/jcph.2001.6961 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002JCoPh.175..645D 175, 645

    2002 doi

  26. [138]

    Duan X., Wu L., Zhang R., Li J., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452506 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...697A.147D 697, A147

    2025 doi

  27. [139]

    P., Fendt C., Vaidya B., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ace0bf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...952....1D 952, 1

    Dubey R. P., Fendt C., Vaidya B., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ace0bf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...952....1D 952, 1

    2023 doi

  28. [140]

    C., Stone J

    Dutta R., Sharma P., Sarkar K. C., Stone J. M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad67d7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...973..148D 973, 148

    2024 doi

  29. [141]

    L., Riley J

    Fanaroff B. L., Riley J. M., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/167.1.31P , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974MNRAS.167P..31F 167, 31P

    1974 doi

  30. [142]

    J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077918 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...476...99G 476, 99

    Giacintucci S., Venturi T., Murgia M., Dallacasa D., Athreya R., Bardelli S., Mazzotta P., Saikia D. J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077918 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...476...99G 476, 99

    2007 doi

  31. [143]

    Giacintucci S., et al., 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 732, 95

    2011

  32. [144]

    D., Feretti L., Lara L., Venturi T., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...552..508G 552, 508

    Giovannini G., Cotton W. D., Feretti L., Lara L., Venturi T., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...552..508G 552, 508

    2001 doi

  33. [145]

    Giri G., Vaidya B., Rossi P., Bodo G., Mukherjee D., Mignone A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142546 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...662A...5G 662, A5

    2022 doi

  34. [146]

    P., Delhaize J., Saikia D

    Giri G., Bagchi J., Thorat K., Deane R. P., Delhaize J., Saikia D. J., 2025a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451812 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...693A..77G 693, A77

    doi

  35. [147]

    J., Deane R

    Giri G., Fendt C., Bagchi J., Thorat K., Saikia D. J., Deane R. P., Delhaize J., 2025b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202554872 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...703A.214G 703, A214

    doi

  36. [148]

    Giri G., Mignone A., Suriano A., Rossazza M., Truzzi S., 2026a, Performance assessment of the gPLUTO code for the numerical modeling of radio galaxy evolution ( @eprint arXiv 2602.21560 ), https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21560

  37. [149]

    arXiv:2604.05471

    Giri G., et al., 2026b, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2604.05471 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260405471G p. arXiv:2604.05471

    doi arXiv

  38. [150]

    Guan X., Li H., Li S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...781...48G 781, 48

    2014 doi

  39. [151]

    J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833893 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A..12H 622, A12

    Hardcastle M. J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833893 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A..12H 622, A12

    2019 doi

  40. [152]

    J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...678A.151H 678, A151

    Hardcastle M. J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...678A.151H 678, A151

    2023 doi

  41. [153]

    A., Hardcastle M

    Horton M. A., Hardcastle M. J., Miley G. K., Tasse C., Shimwell T., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202453559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...699A.338H 699, A338

    2025 doi

  42. [154]

    J., Buote D

    Humphrey P. J., Buote D. A., Gastaldello F., Zappacosta L., Bullock J. S., Brighenti F., Mathews W. G., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505019 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...646..899H 646, 899

    2006 doi

  43. [155]

    H., Hardcastle M

    Ineson J., Croston J. H., Hardcastle M. J., Kraft R. P., Evans D. A., Jarvis M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1807 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453.2682I 453, 2682

    2015 doi

  44. [156]

    H., Saikia D

    Ishwara-Chandra C. H., Saikia D. J., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02835.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.309..100I 309, 100

    1999 doi

  45. [157]

    J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12772.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.385.1286J 385, 1286

    Jamrozy M., Konar C., Machalski J., Saikia D. J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12772.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.385.1286J 385, 1286

    2008 doi

  46. [158]

    C., Das Gupta M

    Jennison R. C., Das Gupta M. K., 1953, @doi [ ] 10.1038/172996a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1953Natur.172..996J 172, 996

    1953 doi

  47. [159]

    Jonas J., MeerKAT Team 2016, in MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA. p. 1, @doi 10.22323/1.277.0001

    2016 doi

  48. [160]

    Kale R., Venturi T., Cassano R., Giacintucci S., Bardelli S., Dallacasa D., Zucca E., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526341 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A..23K 581, A23

    2015 doi

  49. [161]

    Kolokythas K., O'Sullivan E., Raychaudhury S., Giacintucci S., Gitti M., Babul A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2030 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.1550K 481, 1550

    2018 doi

  50. [162]

    Kolokythas K., O'Sullivan E., Intema H., Raychaudhury S., Babul A., Giacintucci S., Gitti M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2082 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.2488K 489, 2488

    2019 doi

  51. [163]

    J., Ishwara-Chandra C

    Konar C., Saikia D. J., Ishwara-Chandra C. H., Kulkarni V. K., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08362.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.355..845K 355, 845

    2004 doi

  52. [164]

    A., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159132 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...248...87L 248, 87

    Laing R. A., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159132 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...248...87L 248, 87

    1981 doi

  53. [165]

    A., Bridle A

    Laing R. A., Bridle A. H., 2015, in Massaro F., Cheung C. C., Lopez E., Siemiginowska A., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 313, Extragalactic Jets from Every Angle. pp 108--115, @doi 10.1017/S1743921315002021

    2015 doi

  54. [166]

    P., Williams A

    Leahy J. P., Williams A. G., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/210.4.929 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984MNRAS.210..929L 210, 929

    1984 doi

  55. [167]

    M., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/257.4.545 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.257..545L 257, 545

    Liu R., Pooley G., Riley J. M., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/257.4.545 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.257..545L 257, 545

    1992 doi

  56. [168]

    Lochner M., Rudnick L., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ada14c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169..121L 169, 121

    2025 doi

  57. [169]

    H., Schellenberger G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423954 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...573A.118L 573, A118

    Lovisari L., Reiprich T. H., Schellenberger G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423954 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...573A.118L 573, A118

    2015 doi

  58. [170]

    J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/586703 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...679..149M 679, 149

    Machalski J., Kozie -Wierzbowska D., Jamrozy M., Saikia D. J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/586703 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...679..149M 679, 149

    2008 doi

  59. [171]

    J., Combes F., Bagchi J., Ho L

    Mahato M., Dabhade P., Saikia D. J., Combes F., Bagchi J., Ho L. C., Raychaudhury S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141928 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...660A..59M 660, A59

    2022 doi

  60. [172]

    M., Staveley-Smith L., Saripalli L., Subrahmanyan R., Jones D

    Malarecki J. M., Staveley-Smith L., Saripalli L., Subrahmanyan R., Jones D. H., Duffy A. R., Rioja M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt471 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432..200M 432, 200

    2013 doi

  61. [173]

    Massaglia S., Bodo G., Rossi P., Capetti S., Mignone A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629375 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...596A..12M 596, A12

    2016 doi

  62. [174]

    J., O'Neill S

    Mendygral P. J., O'Neill S. M., Jones T. W., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/100 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...730..100M 730, 100

    2011 doi

  63. [175]

    J., Jones T

    Mendygral P. J., Jones T. W., Dolag K., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...750..166M 750, 166

    2012 doi

  64. [176]

    C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11849.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.378.1118M 378, 1118

    Mignone A., McKinney J. C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11849.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.378.1118M 378, 1118

    2007 doi

  65. [177]

    Mignone A., Bodo G., Massaglia S., Matsakos T., Tesileanu O., Zanni C., Ferrari A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/513316 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..170..228M 170, 228

    2007 doi

  66. [178]

    Mignone A., Rossi P., Bodo G., Ferrari A., Massaglia S., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15642.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.402....7M 402, 7

    2010 doi

  67. [179]

    Mignone A., Striani E., Tavani M., Ferrari A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1632 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.1102M 436, 1102

    2013 doi

  68. [180]

    Mingo B., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1901 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.2701M 488, 2701

    2019 doi

  69. [181]

    E., Nishikawa K.-I., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...734...19M 734, 19

    Mizuno Y., Hardee P. E., Nishikawa K.-I., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...734...19M 734, 19

    2011 doi

  70. [182]

    L., Nishikawa K.-I., Meli A., Hardee P

    Mizuno Y., G \'o mez J. L., Nishikawa K.-I., Meli A., Hardee P. E., Rezzolla L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/38 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...809...38M 809, 38

    2015 doi

  71. [183]

    Mostert R. I. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348897 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...691A.185M 691, A185

    2024 doi

  72. [184]

    Mukherjee D., Bodo G., Mignone A., Rossi P., Vaidya B., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2934 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499..681M 499, 681

    2020 doi

  73. [185]

    Nardini E., Wang J., Fabbiano G., Elvis M., Pellegrini S., Risaliti G., Karovska M., Zezas A., 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 765, 141

    2013

  74. [186]

    Neronov A., Vazza F., Brandenburg A., Caprini C., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202453099 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...696L...8N 696, L8

    2025 doi

  75. [187]

    P., Baum S

    O'Dea C. P., Baum S. A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/118241 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997AJ....113..148O 113, 148

    1997 doi

  76. [188]

    M., Jones T

    O'Neill S. M., Jones T. W., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/180 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...710..180O 710, 180

    2010 doi

  77. [189]

    Oei M. S. S. L., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142778 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...660A...2O 660, A2

    2022 doi

  78. [190]

    u ggen M., R \

    Oei M. S. S. L., van Weeren R. J., Hardcastle M. J., Vazza F., Shimwell T. W., Leclercq F., Br \"u ggen M., R \"o ttgering H. J. A., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2948 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518..240O 518, 240

    doi

  79. [191]

    Oei M. S. S. L., et al., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243572 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...672A.163O 672, A163

    doi

  80. [192]

    Oei M. S. S. L., et al., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-024-07879-y , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Natur.633..537O 633, 537

    doi

  81. [193]

    Oei M. S. S. L., et al., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A.137O 686, A137

    doi

  82. [194]

    S., Gupta P., Kumar H., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1488 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471....2P 471, 2

    Paul S., John R. S., Gupta P., Kumar H., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1488 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471....2P 471, 2

    2017 doi

  83. [195]

    G., Conway J

    Polatidis A. G., Conway J. E., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1071/AS02053 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASA...20...69P 20, 69

    2003 doi

  84. [196]

    J., Cotter G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1657 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453.4070P 453, 4070

    Potter W. J., Cotter G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1657 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453.4070P 453, 4070

    2015 doi

  85. [197]

    W., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/112 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805..112R 805, 112

    Randall S. W., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/112 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805..112R 805, 112

    2015 doi

  86. [198]

    Rossazza M., et al., 2026, @doi [Astronomy and Computing] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2026.101076 , 55, 101076

    2026 doi

  87. [199]

    Rossi P., Mignone A., Bodo G., Massaglia S., Ferrari A., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809687 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...488..795R 488, 795

    2008 doi

  88. [200]

    Rossi P., Bodo G., Capetti A., Massaglia S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730594 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...606A..57R 606, A57

    2017 doi

  89. [201]

    Rossi P., Bodo G., Massaglia S., Capetti A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348864 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685A...4R 685, A4

    2024 doi

  90. [202]

    Sankhyayan S., Dabhade P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450011 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687L...8S 687, L8

    2024 doi

  91. [203]

    W., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/269.1.37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994MNRAS.269...37S 269, 37

    Saripalli L., Subrahmanyan R., Hunstead R. W., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/269.1.37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994MNRAS.269...37S 269, 37

    1994 doi

  92. [204]

    P., Mack K

    Schoenmakers A. P., Mack K. H., de Bruyn A. G., R \"o ttgering H. J. A., Klein U., van der Laan H., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:2000267 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&AS..146..293S 146, 293

    2000 doi

  93. [205]

    H., Joshi R., Wadadekar Y., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2631 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.4926S 473, 4926

    Sebastian B., Ishwara-Chandra C. H., Joshi R., Wadadekar Y., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2631 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.4926S 473, 4926

    2018 doi

  94. [206]

    K., Barthel P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348904 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A..21S 686, A21

    Simonte M., Andernach H., Br \"u ggen M., Miley G. K., Barthel P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348904 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A..21S 686, A21

    2024 doi

  95. [207]

    Stuardi C., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037635 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...638A..48S 638, A48

    2020 doi

  96. [208]

    W., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/279.1.257 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.279..257S 279, 257

    Subrahmanyan R., Saripalli L., Hunstead R. W., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/279.1.257 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.279..257S 279, 257

    1996 doi

  97. [209]

    W., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/529007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...677...63S 677, 63

    Subrahmanyan R., Saripalli L., Safouris V., Hunstead R. W., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/529007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...677...63S 677, 63

    2008 doi

  98. [210]

    M., Donahue M., Jones C., Forman W., Vikhlinin A., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1142 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...693.1142S 693, 1142

    Sun M., Voit G. M., Donahue M., Jones C., Forman W., Vikhlinin A., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1142 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...693.1142S 693, 1142

    2009 doi

  99. [211]

    Sun M., Sehgal N., Voit G., Donahue M., Jones C., Forman W., Vikhlinin A., Sarazin C., 2011, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 727, L49

    2011

  100. [212]

    H., 1948, @doi [Physical Review] 10.1103/PhysRev.74.328 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1948PhRv...74..328T 74, 328

    Taub A. H., 1948, @doi [Physical Review] 10.1103/PhysRev.74.328 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1948PhRv...74..328T 74, 328

    1948 doi

  101. [213]

    arXiv:2307.16885

    Turisini M., Amati G., Cestari M., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2307.16885 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230716885T p. arXiv:2307.16885

    2023 doi

  102. [214]

    Upreti N., Vaidya B., Shukla A., 2024, @doi [Journal of High Energy Astrophysics] 10.1016/j.jheap.2024.09.007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024JHEAp..44..146U 44, 146

    2024 doi

  103. [215]

    S., Van Speybroeck L., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500288 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...640..691V 640, 691

    Vikhlinin A., Kravtsov A., Forman W., Jones C., Markevitch M., Murray S. S., Van Speybroeck L., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500288 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...640..691V 640, 691

    2006 doi

  104. [216]

    M., Aharonian F

    Wang J.-S., Reville B., Mizuno Y., Rieger F. M., Aharonian F. A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3616 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.1872W 519, 1872

    2023 doi

  105. [217]

    G., Strom R

    Willis A. G., Strom R. G., Wilson A. S., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1038/250625a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974Natur.250..625W 250, 625

    1974 doi

  106. [218]

    Yang X., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab4811 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..245...17Y 245, 17

    2019 doi

  107. [219]

    M., Shabala S

    Yates-Jones P. M., Shabala S. S., Krause M. G. H., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2917 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508.5239Y 508, 5239

    2021 doi

  108. [220]

    P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A...2V 556, A2

    van Haarlem M. P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A...2V 556, A2

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.