pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29533 · v1 · pith:ROADVAY5new · submitted 2026-06-28 · 💻 cs.GT · cs.LG

Improved Multi-Dimensional Forecasting for Swap Regret

Joey Rivkin , Ramiro N. Deo-Campo Vuong , Robert Kleinberg , Chido Onyeze , Erald Sinanaj , Eva Tardos This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 01:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.GT cs.LG
keywords swap regretforecastingbest responseonline algorithmsmulti-agent systemssublinear regretpolynomial time
0
0 comments X

The pith

A polynomial-time algorithm guarantees Õ(√(kT)) swap regret for any downstream agent with k actions in two-dimensional outcome spaces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a single forecasting procedure that works against any number of downstream agents whose objectives are unknown and who best-respond to the issued predictions. In two-dimensional outcome spaces the procedure runs in polynomial time and keeps swap regret at Õ(√(kT)) for every agent that has at most k actions. This removes both the worse T^{5/8} dependence of earlier polynomial algorithms and the exponential-in-T runtime of previous methods that achieved the square-root bound. The same construction extends to other low-dimensional spaces while preserving the square-root dependence on T, with the exponents on k and on the runtime scaling with the dimension. In arbitrary dimension the algorithm yields Õ(d√(kT)) swap regret once an upper bound k on the number of downstream actions is supplied.

Core claim

For two-dimensional outcome spaces, there exists a polynomial-time algorithm that guarantees Õ(√(kT)) swap regret for any downstream agent with k actions. This improves over the previously known bound of Õ(kT^{5/8}) and avoids the exponential-in-T runtime of prior algorithms in this setting. The algorithm extends to other low-dimensional environments while retaining Õ(√T) downstream swap regret (with the exponent of k and the runtime exponent both growing with dimension). For arbitrary dimension d it guarantees Õ(d√(kT)) swap regret assuming the forecaster knows an upper bound k on the number of actions available to any downstream agent.

What carries the argument

A polynomial-time forecasting algorithm that produces predictions guaranteeing sublinear swap regret for all best-responding downstream agents simultaneously in low-dimensional outcome spaces.

If this is right

  • Efficient (polynomial-time) computation suffices to reach the square-root swap-regret scaling in two dimensions.
  • The same technique yields Õ(√T) swap regret in any fixed low dimension, with only the polynomial degree and the power of k depending on dimension.
  • In full dimension the regret bound improves from Õ(T^{2/3}) to Õ(d√(kT)) once a bound k is known.
  • A single forecast sequence works simultaneously for every downstream agent without knowledge of their individual objectives.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the polynomial runtime is practical, the method could support repeated forecasting in vector-payoff environments such as repeated auctions or multi-outcome games.
  • Removing the requirement that k be known in advance would require an adaptive version that learns the action bound on the fly.
  • The dimension-dependent exponents suggest that computational cost and regret scale separately with the geometry of the outcome space.

Load-bearing premise

The forecaster knows an upper bound k on the number of actions available to any downstream agent.

What would settle it

An explicit two-dimensional instance together with a downstream agent possessing k actions on which the algorithm produces swap regret that grows faster than any constant times √(kT) for sufficiently large T.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29533 by Chido Onyeze, Erald Sinanaj, Eva Tardos, Joey Rivkin, Ramiro N. Deo-Campo Vuong, Robert Kleinberg.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Best-response regions partitioning a prediction space (with the dual graph of the partition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the problem of forecasting for an arbitrary number of downstream agents with unknown objectives, each of whom best responds to the forecaster's predictions. We seek a single forecaster that guarantees sublinear swap regret for all downstream agents simultaneously. For two-dimensional outcome spaces, we give a polynomial time algorithm that guarantees $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{kT})$ swap regret for any downstream agent with $k$ actions. This improves over the previously known bound of $\tilde{O}(kT^{5/8})$ and avoids the exponential in $T$ runtime of prior algorithms in this setting. Our algorithm extends nicely to other low dimensional environments, retaining $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ downstream swap regret while the exponent of $k$ in the regret bound and the exponent of $T$ in the running time both grow with dimension. For arbitrary dimension $d$, we give a forecasting algorithm that guarantees $\tilde{O}(d\sqrt{kT})$ swap regret, assuming the forecaster knows an upper bound $k$ on the number of actions available to any downstream agent, albeit with a much longer runtime. This improves upon previous high dimensional guarantees that had $\tilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ dependence and required additional behavioral assumptions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper studies forecasting for an arbitrary number of downstream agents with unknown objectives who best-respond to predictions. It seeks a single forecaster guaranteeing sublinear swap regret simultaneously for all agents. For two-dimensional outcome spaces it claims a polynomial-time algorithm achieving Õ(√(kT)) swap regret for any downstream agent with k actions (improving the prior Õ(kT^{5/8}) bound and avoiding exponential-in-T runtime). The approach extends to other low-dimensional settings while retaining Õ(√T) regret (with dimension-dependent exponents on k and T). For arbitrary dimension d it gives an algorithm achieving Õ(d√(kT)) swap regret when an upper bound k on the number of downstream actions is known (improving prior T^{2/3} dependence).

Significance. If the stated algorithmic guarantees, runtime bounds, and regret improvements hold, the work would constitute a meaningful advance in online learning and forecasting for games, by tightening the dependence on T and k in low dimensions and removing restrictive behavioral assumptions in the high-dimensional case.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claims rest on the existence and correctness of a new polynomial-time algorithm for the 2D case and its regret analysis. However, the full manuscript text (including algorithm description, pseudocode, runtime analysis, and proofs) is not provided; only the abstract is available. Without access to these sections it is impossible to verify whether the claimed Õ(√(kT)) bound and polynomial runtime are achieved or whether unstated assumptions beyond knowledge of k are required. This is load-bearing for the primary contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for highlighting the importance of verifying the algorithmic claims. The full manuscript (beyond the abstract excerpt) contains the complete algorithm description, pseudocode, runtime analysis, and proofs for the 2D case as well as the higher-dimensional extensions. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claims rest on the existence and correctness of a new polynomial-time algorithm for the 2D case and its regret analysis. However, the full manuscript text (including algorithm description, pseudocode, runtime analysis, and proofs) is not provided; only the abstract is available. Without access to these sections it is impossible to verify whether the claimed Õ(√(kT)) bound and polynomial runtime are achieved or whether unstated assumptions beyond knowledge of k are required. This is load-bearing for the primary contribution.

    Authors: The complete manuscript submitted for review includes dedicated sections on the 2D algorithm (with pseudocode), its polynomial-time runtime analysis (via reduction to a suitable convex program solvable in poly(k,T) time), and the full regret proof establishing the Õ(√(kT)) bound. These sections follow the abstract and are not limited to the excerpt shown in the referee summary. The algorithm requires only the stated knowledge of an upper bound k on downstream actions and makes no additional behavioral assumptions. The same sections also contain the extensions to other low-dimensional settings and the high-dimensional result with Õ(d√(kT)) regret. If the review platform displayed only the abstract, we are happy to supply the relevant sections or the full PDF directly. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; claims rest on new algorithmic constructions

full rationale

The provided abstract and description present new polynomial-time algorithms for multi-dimensional forecasting that achieve improved swap-regret bounds (Õ(√(kT)) in 2D, Õ(d√(kT)) in d dimensions). No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are exhibited that reduce these guarantees to inputs by construction. The derivation chain consists of algorithmic innovations rather than self-definitional or load-bearing self-citation steps, making the result self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed from abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5768 in / 1073 out tokens · 35690 ms · 2026-06-30T01:47:49.890947+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2024 , isbn =

    Roth, Aaron and Shi, Mirah , title =. 2024 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3670865.3673622 , booktitle =

    work page doi:10.1145/3670865.3673622 2024

  2. [2]

    Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning , pages =

    High-Dimensional Prediction for Sequential Decision Making , author =. Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning , pages =. 2025 , editor =

    2025

  3. [3]

    Proceedings of Thirty Sixth Conference on Learning Theory , pages =

    U-Calibration: Forecasting for an Unknown Agent , author =. Proceedings of Thirty Sixth Conference on Learning Theory , pages =. 2023 , editor =

    2023

  4. [4]

    Optimal Multiclass U-Calibration Error and Beyond , url =

    Luo, Haipeng and Senapati, Spandan and Sharan, Vatsal , booktitle =. Optimal Multiclass U-Calibration Error and Beyond , url =. doi:10.52202/079017-0241 , editor =

    work page doi:10.52202/079017-0241

  5. [5]

    Foster and Rakesh V

    Dean P. Foster and Rakesh V. Vohra , journal =. Asymptotic Calibration , urldate =

  6. [6]

    2025 , isbn =

    Dagan, Yuval and Daskalakis, Constantinos and Fishelson, Maxwell and Golowich, Noah and Kleinberg, Robert and Okoroafor, Princewill , title =. 2025 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3717823.3718178 , booktitle =

    work page doi:10.1145/3717823.3718178 2025

  7. [7]

    2025 , eprint=

    High dimensional online calibration in polynomial time , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  8. [8]

    Predict to Minimize Swap Regret for All Payoff-Bounded Tasks , year=

    Hu, Lunjia and Wu, Yifan , booktitle=. Predict to Minimize Swap Regret for All Payoff-Bounded Tasks , year=

  9. [9]

    2013 , publisher=

    Lectures on discrete geometry , author=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  10. [10]

    Handbook of discrete and computational geometry , pages=

    Subdivisions and triangulations of polytopes , author=. Handbook of discrete and computational geometry , pages=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  11. [11]

    Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , articleno =

    Lee, Daniel and Noarov, Georgy and Pai, Mallesh and Roth, Aaron , title =. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , articleno =. 2022 , isbn =

    2022

  12. [12]

    2011 , eprint=

    Freedman's inequality for matrix martingales , author=. 2011 , eprint=

    2011

  13. [13]

    Provably good mesh generation , journal =

    Marshall Bern and David Eppstein and John Gilbert , abstract =. Provably good mesh generation , journal =. 1994 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0000(05)80059-5 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-0000(05)80059-5 1994

  14. [14]

    Uncertain:

    Roth, Aaron , year=. Uncertain:

  15. [15]

    1998 , publisher =

    Statistical Learning Theory , author =. 1998 , publisher =

    1998

  16. [16]

    On the density of families of sets

    On the density of families of sets , journal =. 1972 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0097-3165(72)90019-2 , author =

    work page doi:10.1016/0097-3165(72)90019-2 1972

  17. [17]

    Pacific Journal of Mathematics , volume =

    A combinatorial problem; stability and order for models and theories in infinitary languages , author =. Pacific Journal of Mathematics , volume =

  18. [18]

    Mathematika , author=

    The maximum numbers of faces of a convex polytope , volume=. Mathematika , author=. 1970 , pages=. doi:10.1112/S0025579300002850 , number=

    work page doi:10.1112/s0025579300002850 1970

  19. [19]

    Courant on his 60th Birthday, January 8, 1948 , author=

    Extremum problems with inequalities as subsidiary conditions, Studies and Essays Presented to R. Courant on his 60th Birthday, January 8, 1948 , author=. 1948 , publisher=

    1948

  20. [20]

    , author=

    From external to internal regret. , author=. Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

  21. [21]

    Proceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing , pages=

    Fast swap regret minimization and applications to approximate correlated equilibria , author=. Proceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing , pages=

  22. [22]

    From external to swap regret 2.0:

    Dagan, Yuval and Daskalakis, Constantinos and Fishelson, Maxwell and Golowich, Noah , booktitle=. From external to swap regret 2.0:

  23. [23]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

    Fishelson, Maxwell and Golowich, Noah and Mohri, Mehryar and Schneider, Jon , title =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

  24. [24]

    Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing , pages=

    Stronger calibration lower bounds via sidestepping , author=. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing , pages=

  25. [25]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    A tight lower bound and efficient reduction for swap regret , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  26. [26]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    On the generalization ability of online strongly convex programming algorithms , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  27. [27]

    Geometric Combinatorics , volume=

    An introduction to hyperplane arrangements , author=. Geometric Combinatorics , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  28. [28]

    Freedman , journal =

    David A. Freedman , journal =. On Tail Probabilities for Martingales , urldate =

  29. [29]

    2015 , isbn =

    Nekipelov, Denis and Syrgkanis, Vasilis and Tardos, Eva , title =. 2015 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/2764468.2764522 , booktitle =

    work page doi:10.1145/2764468.2764522 2015

  30. [30]

    Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages=

    Optimization of scoring rules , author=. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages=

  31. [31]

    Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 , pages=

    Bid prediction in repeated auctions with learning , author=. Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 , pages=

    2021