pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29588 · v1 · pith:YPYH4UBQnew · submitted 2026-06-28 · ⚛️ nucl-th · astro-ph.HE· nucl-ex

Nuclear equation-of-state at high density and multi-messenger astronomy: contribution of heavy-ion collisions

A. Le F\`evre This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 01:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th astro-ph.HEnucl-ex
keywords nuclear equation of stateheavy-ion collisionssymmetry energyneutron starsgravitational wavesmulti-messenger astronomytransport modelsflow observables
0
0 comments X

The pith

Heavy-ion collision constraints on the nuclear equation of state predict neutron-star pressure up to 2.5 times saturation density in agreement with gravitational-wave and pulsar data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energies probe the nuclear equation of state for symmetric and asymmetric matter through observables such as flow. Combining the resulting constraints on symmetry energy and symmetric nuclear matter yields a predicted pressure-versus-density relation inside neutron stars that matches independent astronomical determinations up to roughly 2.5 times saturation density, with comparable accuracy to the astronomical data up to 1.5 times saturation density. The work stresses that reliable extraction of these constraints requires accurate knowledge of the density profiles actually sampled by the experimental observables. Future higher-energy experiments and improved transport-model simulations are presented as necessary to extend the reach and reduce uncertainties.

Core claim

Combining the symmetry energy and the symmetric nuclear matter constraints of the EoS from HIC allowed to predict a density dependence of the pressure in a neutron star, up to about 2.5 times saturation density (n_sat), which agrees with recent astronomical measurements deduced from gravitational waves and pulsar observations.

What carries the argument

Flow observables in heavy-ion collisions that constrain the nuclear equation of state, together with the determination of the density profiles they probe.

If this is right

  • New experiments such as ASY-EOS at higher incident energies and better accuracy will extend knowledge of the symmetry energy to higher densities.
  • Reliable uncertainty determination tied to transport-model reliability is required for conclusive HIC contributions.
  • Improvements in transport-model simulations and nuclear theory are needed to incorporate strangeness and QCD phase-transition effects into neutron-star physics.
  • The accuracy of HIC-based predictions is already comparable to astronomical data up to 1.5 n_sat and can be extended further with the above advances.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If transport models carry larger hidden dependencies than currently quantified, the reported agreement between HIC-derived and astronomical pressures may weaken at higher densities.
  • Tighter HIC constraints could help discriminate among competing models of neutron-star interiors that currently fit the same multi-messenger data.
  • Extending the HIC reach beyond 2.5 n_sat would provide an independent test for the onset of strangeness or deconfined matter inside the densest neutron stars.

Load-bearing premise

Transport models used to interpret heavy-ion collision observables accurately determine both the density profiles probed by the data and the associated uncertainties without large unquantified model dependencies.

What would settle it

A new astronomical measurement or refined heavy-ion analysis that shows the predicted pressure-density curve from combined HIC constraints deviates measurably from gravitational-wave or pulsar results above 1.5 n_sat.

read the original abstract

In the past decades, heavy-ion collisions (HIC) at intermediate energies have allowed to probe the nuclear equation-of-state (EoS) of both symmetric and asymmetric nuclear matter over a broad range of densities. In particular, flow has proven to be a powerful observable. Combining the symmetry energy and the symmetric nuclear matter constraints of the EoS from HIC allowed to predict a density dependence of the pressure in a neutron star, up to about 2.5 times saturation density ($n_{sat}$), which agrees with recent astronomical measurements deduced from gravitational waves and pulsar observations. So far, the accuracy from HIC expectations is comparable to the latter up to 1.5 $n_{sat}$. In these studies, a fundamental aspect is the determination of the profile of densities that are probed by experimental observables used to constrain the EoS. In the near future, new experiments like ASY-EOS performed at higher incident energy and with better accuracy will push further the frontier of the knowledge of the symmetry energy at higher density. These efforts cannot be conclusive without a reliable uncertainty determination, which is related to the reliability of transport model dependencies. Improvements and breakthroughs in transport model simulations and nuclear theory are therefore expected in a joint effort towards HIC contributions to the field of neutron-star physics, including the contribution of strangeness and of the QCD phase transition.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews how heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energies constrain the nuclear equation-of-state (EoS) via flow observables for both symmetric and asymmetric matter. It asserts that combining these symmetry energy and symmetric nuclear matter constraints enables a prediction of the pressure-density relation in neutron stars up to approximately 2.5 n_sat that agrees with gravitational wave and pulsar observations, with HIC providing comparable accuracy up to 1.5 n_sat. The text stresses the importance of determining the density profiles probed by observables and notes that reliable uncertainty quantification depends on transport model reliability. It calls for new experiments such as ASY-EOS and joint improvements in transport simulations and nuclear theory to advance contributions to neutron-star physics, including strangeness and QCD phase transitions.

Significance. If substantiated, the claimed consistency between HIC-derived EoS and multi-messenger astronomical data would provide valuable independent validation of the high-density nuclear EoS, helping to bridge terrestrial experiments and astrophysical observations. The explicit identification of transport model dependencies as a key limitation is a strength, as it correctly identifies a critical area for future work.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the combined HIC constraints 'allowed to predict a density dependence of the pressure in a neutron star, up to about 2.5 times saturation density (n_sat), which agrees with recent astronomical measurements' lacks any visible supporting analysis, such as explicit EoS parametrizations, uncertainty bands, or comparison metrics. Since the full manuscript text is limited to the abstract, it is unclear if the derivation or comparison is detailed elsewhere in the paper.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript acknowledges that 'these efforts cannot be conclusive without a reliable uncertainty determination, which is related to the reliability of transport model dependencies,' but does not provide any bounds or sensitivity analysis on how variations in transport models affect the extracted EoS or the resulting pressure prediction. This is load-bearing for the agreement claim, as unquantified systematics could shift the HIC pressure curve and undermine the reported consistency with astronomical data.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including specific references to the 'these studies' that produced the HIC constraints and the agreement, or by citing the relevant prior works on flow observables and transport models.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the positive evaluation of the manuscript's significance. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions to the abstract.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the combined HIC constraints 'allowed to predict a density dependence of the pressure in a neutron star, up to about 2.5 times saturation density (n_sat), which agrees with recent astronomical measurements' lacks any visible supporting analysis, such as explicit EoS parametrizations, uncertainty bands, or comparison metrics. Since the full manuscript text is limited to the abstract, it is unclear if the derivation or comparison is detailed elsewhere in the paper.

    Authors: This short manuscript is a concise review abstract summarizing results established in the prior literature on heavy-ion collision constraints. The explicit EoS parametrizations, uncertainty bands, and direct comparisons with gravitational-wave and pulsar data appear in the original studies that this abstract reviews. We will revise the abstract to cite the key references that contain those supporting analyses and metrics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript acknowledges that 'these efforts cannot be conclusive without a reliable uncertainty determination, which is related to the reliability of transport model dependencies,' but does not provide any bounds or sensitivity analysis on how variations in transport models affect the extracted EoS or the resulting pressure prediction. This is load-bearing for the agreement claim, as unquantified systematics could shift the HIC pressure curve and undermine the reported consistency with astronomical data.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of quantitative bounds on transport-model systematics is a limitation of the present text. The abstract already flags this as essential for future conclusiveness. In revision we will add references to recent transport-model uncertainty studies and note how they affect the extracted pressure-density relation up to the quoted densities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: HIC EoS constraints applied to NS pressure is a standard forward prediction compared to external data

full rationale

The abstract states that HIC-derived constraints on symmetry energy and symmetric nuclear matter EoS are combined to predict the density dependence of pressure in a neutron star up to 2.5 n_sat, with the result agreeing with independent astronomical measurements from GW and pulsars. This is a conventional use of an EoS extracted from one domain (HIC) to compute a quantity in another domain (NS), followed by external validation; no equation or step is shown to reduce to its own inputs by construction. The text explicitly flags transport-model uncertainties as a prerequisite for conclusiveness rather than assuming them away, and no self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked. The provided abstract contains no derivation chain that can be inspected for self-definition or fitted-input renaming.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; full details on transport-model assumptions, fitted parameters, and density-profile extraction methods are unavailable. No explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5751 in / 1240 out tokens · 38646 ms · 2026-06-30T01:41:56.956517+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Li, B.-A., Chen, L.-W. & Ko, C. M. Recent progress and new challenges in isospin physics with heavy-ion reactions.Physics Reports464, 113–281 (2008). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157308001269

    2008

  2. [2]

    Burgio, G. F. & Vida˜ na, I. The equation of state of nuclear matter: From finite nuclei to neutron stars.Universe6(2020). URL https://www.mdpi.com/ 2218-1997/6/8/119

    2020

  3. [3]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/878/1/012031

    Hanauske, M.et al.Concluding remarks: Connecting relativistic heavy ion colli- sions and neutron star mergers by the equation of state of dense hadron- and quark matter as signalled by gravitational waves.Journal of Physics: Conference Series 878, 012031 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/878/1/012031

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/878/1/012031 2017

  4. [4]

    D., Lang, R

    Hinderer, T., Lackey, B. D., Lang, R. N. & Read, J. S. Tidal deformability of neutron stars with realistic equations of state and their gravitational wave signatures in binary inspiral.Phys. Rev. D81, 123016 (2010). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.123016 2010

  5. [5]

    & Aichelin, J

    Le F` evre, A., Leifels, Y., Hartnack, C. & Aichelin, J. Origin of elliptic flow and its dependence on the equation of state in heavy ion reactions at intermediate energies.Phys. Rev. C98, 034901 (2018). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevC.98.034901

    2018

  6. [6]

    Y., Tsang, M

    Tsang, C. Y., Tsang, M. B., Lynch, W. G., Kumar, R. & Horowitz, C. J. Deter- mination of the equation of state from nuclear experiments and neutron star observations.Nature Astronomy8, 328–336 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41550-023-02161-z. 30

    2024

  7. [7]

    B.et al.Isospin diffusion and the nuclear symmetry energy in heavy ion reactions.Phys

    Tsang, M. B.et al.Isospin diffusion and the nuclear symmetry energy in heavy ion reactions.Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 062701 (2004). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.062701

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.062701 2004

  8. [8]

    B.et al.Constraints on the density dependence of the symmetry energy.Phys

    Tsang, M. B.et al.Constraints on the density dependence of the symmetry energy.Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 122701 (2009). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.102.122701

    2009

  9. [9]

    Tamii, A.et al.Complete electric dipole response and the neutron skin in 208Pb. Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 062502 (2011). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.107.062502

    2011

  10. [10]

    Piekarewicz, J.et al.Electric dipole polarizability and the neutron skin.Phys. Rev. C85, 041302 (2012). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.85. 041302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.85 2012

  11. [11]

    URL https:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319307671

    Morfouace, P.et al.Constraining the symmetry energy with heavy-ion collisions and bayesian analyses.Physics Letters B799, 135045 (2019). URL https:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319307671

    2019

  12. [12]

    Adhikari, D.et al.Accurate determination of the neutron skin thickness of 208Pb through parity-violation in electron scattering.Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 172502 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.172502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.172502 2021

  13. [13]

    & Warda, M

    Roca-Maza, X., Centelles, M., Vi˜ nas, X. & Warda, M. Neutron skin of 208Pb, nuclear symmetry energy, and the parity radius experiment.Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 252501 (2011). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.252501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.252501 2011

  14. [14]

    & Lee, J

    Danielewicz, P. & Lee, J. Symmetry energy II: Isobaric analog states.Nuclear Physics A922, 1–70 (2014). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0375947413007872

    2014

  15. [15]

    Brown, B. A. Constraints on the skyrme equations of state from properties of doubly magic nuclei.Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 232502 (2013). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.232502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.232502 2013

  16. [16]

    & Chen, L.-W

    Zhang, Z. & Chen, L.-W. Constraining the symmetry energy at subsatura- tion densities using isotope binding energy difference and neutron skin thickness. Physics Letters B726, 234–238 (2013). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S037026931300628X

    2013

  17. [17]

    Roca-Maza, X.et al.Giant quadrupole resonances in 208P b, the nuclear symmetry energy, and the neutron skin thickness.Phys. Rev. C87, 034301 (2013). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.034301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.87.034301 2013

  18. [18]

    Nuclear compressibilities.Physics Reports64, 171–248 (1980)

    Blaizot, J. Nuclear compressibilities.Physics Reports64, 171–248 (1980). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370157380900010. 31

    work page arXiv 1980

  19. [19]

    H., Clark, H

    Youngblood, D. H., Clark, H. L. & Lui, Y.-W. Incompressibility of nuclear matter from the giant monopole resonance.Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 691–694 (1999). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.691

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.691 1999

  20. [20]

    & Margueron, J

    Khan, E. & Margueron, J. Determination of the density dependence of the nuclear incompressibility.Phys. Rev. C88, 034319 (2013). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.034319

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.034319 2013

  21. [21]

    St¨ ocker, H., Maruhn, J. A. & Greiner, W. Collective sideward flow of nuclear matter in violent high-energy heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett.44, 725–728 (1980). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.725

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.44.725 1980

  22. [22]

    Probing the high density behavior of the nuclear symmetry energy with high energy heavy-ion collisions.Phys

    Li, B.-A. Probing the high density behavior of the nuclear symmetry energy with high energy heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 192701 (2002). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.192701

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.192701 2002

  23. [23]

    & Zuo, W

    Li, B.-A., Yong, G.-C. & Zuo, W. Near-threshold pion production with radioactive beams.Phys. Rev. C71, 014608 (2005). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.71.014608

    2005

  24. [24]

    Estee, J.et al.Probing the symmetry energy with the spectral pion ratio. Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 162701 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.126.162701

    2021

  25. [25]

    Aichelin, J. & Ko, C. M. Subthreshold kaon production as a probe of the nuclear equation of state.Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 2661–2663 (1985). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2661

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.2661 1985

  26. [26]

    Hartnack, C., Oeschler, H., Leifels, Y., Bratkovskaya, E. L. & Aichelin, J. Strangeness production close to the threshold in proton–nucleus and heavy-ion collisions.Physics Reports510, 119–200 (2012). URL https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S037015731100247X. Strangeness production close to the threshold in proton–nucleus and heavy-ion collisions

    2012

  27. [27]

    Sturm, C.et al.Evidence for a soft nuclear equation-of-state from kaon production in heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 39–42 (2001). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.39

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.39 2001

  28. [28]

    Lopez, X.et al.Isospin dependence of relative yields ofK + andK 0 mesons at 1.528A GeV.Phys. Rev. C75, 011901 (2007). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevC.75.011901

    2007

  29. [29]

    & Lynch, W

    Danielewicz, P., Lacey, R. & Lynch, W. G. Determination of the equation of state of dense matter.Science298, 1592–1596 (2002). URL https://www.science.org/ doi/abs/10.1126/science.1078070. 32

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1078070 2002

  30. [30]

    & Hartnack, C

    Le F` evre, A., Leifels, Y., Reisdorf, W., Aichelin, J. & Hartnack, C. Constraining the nuclear matter equation of state around twice saturation density.Nuclear Physics A945, 112–133 (2016). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0375947415002225

    2016

  31. [31]

    Hartnack, C.et al.Modeling the many body dynamics of heavy ion collisions: Present status and future perspective.Eur. Phys. J. A1, 151–169 (1998). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s100500050045

    work page doi:10.1007/s100500050045 1998

  32. [32]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/28/7/313

    Fuchs, C.et al.The nuclear equation of state probed byK + production in heavy ion collisions.Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics28, 1615 (2002). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/28/7/313

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/7/313 2002

  33. [33]

    & Aichelin, J

    Hartnack, C., Oeschler, H. & Aichelin, J. Hadronic matter is soft.Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 012302 (2006). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96. 012302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96 2006

  34. [34]

    & Trautmann, W

    Andronic, A., Lukasik, J., Reisdorf, W. & Trautmann, W. Systematics of stopping and flow in Au+Au collisions.European Physical Journal A30, 31–46 (2006). URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2006-10101-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2006-10101-2 2006

  35. [35]

    URL https://www

    Reisdorf, W.et al.Systematics of azimuthal asymmetries in heavy ion collisions in the 1A GeV regime.Nuclear Physics A876, 1–60 (2012). URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947411006877

    2012

  36. [36]

    Physics Letters B778, 207–212 (2018)

    Wang, Y.et al.Determination of the nuclear incompressibility from the rapidity- dependent elliptic flow in heavy-ion collisions at beam energies 0.4A–1.0A GeV. Physics Letters B778, 207–212 (2018). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0370269318300431

    2018

  37. [37]

    Cozma, M. D. Equation of state of nuclear matter from collective flows and stopping in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. C110, 064911 (2024). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.064911

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.064911 2024

  38. [38]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/31/11/ 016

    Li, Q.et al.Probing the density dependence of the symmetry potential in intermediate-energy heavy ion collisions.Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Par- ticle Physics31, 1359 (2005). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/31/11/ 016

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/31/11/ 2005

  39. [39]

    Cozma, M. D. The impact of energy conservation in transport models on the π−/π+ multiplicity ratio in heavy-ion collisions and the symmetry energy.Phys. Lett. B753, 166–172 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12. 015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12 2016

  40. [40]

    A., Mohs, J., Andronic, A., Elfner, H

    Tarasovicov´ a, L. A., Mohs, J., Andronic, A., Elfner, H. & Kampert, K.-H. Flow and equation of state of nuclear matter ate kin/a= 0.25–1.5 GeV with the SMASH transport approach.Eur. Phys. J. A60, 232 (2024). URL https: 33 //doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01445-w

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01445-w 2024

  41. [41]

    St¨ ocker, H.et al.Jets of nuclear matter from high energy heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C25, 1873–1876 (1982). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.25.1873

    1982

  42. [42]

    Andronic, A.et al.Directed flow in Au+Au, Xe+CsI, and Ni+Ni collisions and the nuclear equation of state.Phys. Rev. C67, 034907 (2003). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.034907

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.67.034907 2003

  43. [43]

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14255

    Zhou, Y.et al.Probing of EoS with clusters and hypernuclei (2025). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14255. arXiv:2507.14255

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    J.et al.A way forward in the study of the symmetry energy: experiment, theory, and observation.J

    Horowitz, C. J.et al.A way forward in the study of the symmetry energy: experiment, theory, and observation.J. Phys. G41, 093001 (2014)

    2014

  45. [45]

    Russotto, P.et al.Results of the ASY-EOS experiment at GSI: The symmetry energy at suprasaturation density.Phys. Rev. C94, 034608 (2016). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.034608

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.94.034608 2016

  46. [46]

    Lynch, W. G. & Tsang, M. B. Decoding the density dependence of the nuclear symmetry energy.Phys. Lett. B830, 137098 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    High density behaviour of nuclear symmetry energy and high energy heavy-ion collisions.Nuclear Physics A708, 365–390 (2002)

    Li, B.-A. High density behaviour of nuclear symmetry energy and high energy heavy-ion collisions.Nuclear Physics A708, 365–390 (2002). URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947402010187

    2002

  48. [48]

    Nuovo Cim.46, 1–70 (2023)

    Russotto, P.et al.Studies of the equation-of-state of nuclear matter by heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energy in the multi-messenger era: A review focused on GSI results.Riv. Nuovo Cim.46, 1–70 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40766-023-00039-4

    2023

  49. [49]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-022-04750-w

    Huth, S.et al.Constraining neutron-star matter with microscopic and macro- scopic collisions.Nature606, 276–280 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-022-04750-w

    2022

  50. [50]

    & Schwenk, A

    Drischler, C., Hebeler, K. & Schwenk, A. Chiral interactions up to next-to-next- to-next-to-leading order and nuclear saturation.Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 042501 (2019). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.042501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.042501 2019

  51. [51]

    Trautmann, W.et al.The symmetry energy in nuclear reactions.Int. J. Mod. Phys. E19, 1653–1663 (2010). URL https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218301310016077

    2010

  52. [52]

    URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S037026931100178X

    Russotto, P.et al.Symmetry energy from elliptic flow in 197Au+ 197 Au.Physics Letters B697, 471–476 (2011). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S037026931100178X. 34

    2011

  53. [53]

    Cozma, M. D. Neutron–proton elliptic flow difference as a probe for the high den- sity dependence of the symmetry energy.Physics Letters B700, 139–144 (2011). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269311004837

    2011

  54. [54]

    D., Leifels, Y., Trautmann, W., Li, Q

    Cozma, M. D., Leifels, Y., Trautmann, W., Li, Q. & Russotto, P. Toward a model-independent constraint of the high-density dependence of the symmetry energy.Phys. Rev. C88, 044912 (2013). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.88.044912

    2013

  55. [55]

    & Rizzo, J

    Giordano, V., Colonna, M., Di Toro, M., Greco, V. & Rizzo, J. Isospin emission and flow at high baryon density: A test of the symmetry potential.Phys. Rev. C 81, 044611 (2010). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.044611

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.81.044611 2010

  56. [56]

    Leifels, Y.et al.Exclusive studies of neutron and charged particle emission in collisions of 197Au + 197Au at 400 MeV/nucleon.Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 963–966 (1993). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.963

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.963 1993

  57. [57]

    Lambrecht, D.et al.Energy dependence of collective flow of neutrons and protons in 197Au+ 197 Aucollisions.Z. Phys. A350, 115–120 (1994). URL https://doi. org/10.1007/BF01290679

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01290679 1994

  58. [58]

    & Wolter, H

    Fuchs, C. & Wolter, H. H. Modelization of the EOS.Eur. Phys. J. A30, 5–21 (2006). URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2005-10313-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2005-10313-x 2006

  59. [59]

    URL https://www

    Reisdorf, W.et al.Systematics of pion emission in heavy ion collisions in the 1A GeV regime.Nuclear Physics A781, 459–508 (2007). URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947406007676

    2007

  60. [60]

    Xu, J.et al.Understanding transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions at 100A and 400AMeV: Comparison of heavy-ion transport codes under controlled con- ditions.Phys. Rev. C93, 044609 (2016). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.93.044609

    2016

  61. [61]

    Zhang, Y.-X.et al.Comparison of heavy-ion transport simulations: Collision integral in a box.Phys. Rev. C97, 034625 (2018). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034625

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.034625 2018

  62. [62]

    Ono, A.et al.Comparison of heavy-ion transport simulations: Collision integral with pions and ∆ resonances in a box.Phys. Rev. C100, 044617 (2019). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.044617

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.100.044617 2019

  63. [63]

    Colonna, M.et al.Comparison of heavy-ion transport simulations: Mean-field dynamics in a box.Phys. Rev. C104, 024603 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024603

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.024603 2021

  64. [64]

    35 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641022000230

    Wolter, H.et al.Transport model comparison studies of intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions.Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics125, 103962 (2022). 35 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641022000230

    2022

  65. [65]

    Cozma, M. D. Relevance of non-resonant contributions to pion pro- duction in heavy-ion reactions close to threshold. Oral presenta- tion at theXIII th International Symposium on Nuclear Symmetry Energy (2025). URL https://indico2.riken.jp/event/5134/contributions/26802/ attachments/14110/21202/cozma nusym25.pdf. Kobe, Japan, 8–13 September 2025

    2025

  66. [66]

    & Chen, L.-W

    Li, B.-A. & Chen, L.-W. Neutron–proton effective mass splitting in neutron- rich matter and its impacts on nuclear reactions.Modern Physics Letters A30, 1530010 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732315300104

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732315300104 2015

  67. [67]

    Coupland, D. D. S.et al.Probing effective nucleon masses with heavy-ion col- lisions.Phys. Rev. C94, 011601(R) (2016). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevC.94.011601

    2016

  68. [68]

    High density with elliptic flows.AIP Conference Proceedings 2127, 020003 (2019)

    Trautmann, W. High density with elliptic flows.AIP Conference Proceedings 2127, 020003 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5117793

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5117793 2019

  69. [69]

    & Schaffner-Bielich, J

    Ghosh, S., Chatterjee, D. & Schaffner-Bielich, J. Imposing multi-physics con- straints at different densities on the neutron Star Equation of State.Eur. Phys. J. A58, 37 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00679-w

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00679-w 2022

  70. [70]

    URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641023000613

    Sorensen, A.et al.Dense nuclear matter equation of state from heavy-ion col- lisions.Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics134, 104080 (2024). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641023000613

    2024

  71. [71]

    Cozma, M. D. & Trautmann, W. Neutron star radii from laboratory experi- ments.Int. J. Mod. Phys. E34, 2530001 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218301325300012

    2025

  72. [72]

    106.063503

    Legred, I., Chatziioannou, K., Essick, R., Han, S. & Landry, P. Impact of the PSR J0740 + 6620 radius constraint on the properties of high-density matter.Phys. Rev. D104, 063003 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD. 104.063003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2021

  73. [73]

    A.et al.Motivations for Early High-Profile FRIB Experiments (2024)

    Brown, B. A.et al.Motivations for Early High-Profile FRIB Experiments (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06144. arXiv:2410.06144

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    FRIB400: The Scientific Case for the 400 MeV/u Energy Upgrade of FRIB (2019)

    FRIB Science Community. FRIB400: The Scientific Case for the 400 MeV/u Energy Upgrade of FRIB (2019). URL https://frib.msu.edu/ files/pdfs/frib400 final.pdf. Updated February 2023, accessed 2023-07-16

    2019

  75. [75]

    & Wolter, H

    Greco, V., Colonna, M., Di Toro, M. & Wolter, H. H. Probing the symmetry energy at high baryon density with heavy ion collisions.Int. J. Mod. Phys. E19, 1664 (2010). URL https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301310016089. 36

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218301310016089 2010

  76. [76]

    & Zhang, M

    Xiao, Z., Li, B.-A., Chen, L.-W., Yong, G.-C. & Zhang, M. Circumstantial evi- dence for a soft nuclear symmetry energy at suprasaturation densities.Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 062502 (2009). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 102.062502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2009

  77. [77]

    & Wolter, H

    Ferini, G., Gaitanos, T., Colonna, M., Di Toro, M. & Wolter, H. H. Isospin effects on subthreshold kaon production at intermediate energies.Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 202301 (2006). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.202301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.202301 2006

  78. [78]

    & Lin, Z.-W

    Yong, G.-C., Li, B.-A., Xiao, Z.-G. & Lin, Z.-W. Probing the high-density nuclear symmetry energy with the Ξ −/Ξ0 ratio in heavy-ion collisions at √sN N ≈3 GeV.Phys. Rev. C106, 024902 (2022). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.106.024902

    2022

  79. [79]

    Collision dynamics at medium and relativistic energies.Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics113, 103775 (2020)

    Colonna, M. Collision dynamics at medium and relativistic energies.Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics113, 103775 (2020). URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641020300223

    2020

  80. [80]

    C.et al.Dynamical phase trajectories for relativistic nuclear colli- sions.Phys

    Arsene, I. C.et al.Dynamical phase trajectories for relativistic nuclear colli- sions.Phys. Rev. C75, 034902 (2007). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.75.034902

    2007

Showing first 80 references.