pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30760 · v1 · pith:ORC7NU3Bnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Rich Phenomenology from Simple Ingredients: A Review of Confining Dark Sectors

Pouya Asadi , Austin Batz , Graham D. Kribs This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 01:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords confining dark sectorscomposite dark matternon-Abelian gauge theoriesdark mesonsdark baryonsabundance similaritydark matter phenomenologycosmology
0
0 comments X

The pith

Confining dark sectors built from new non-Abelian gauge forces produce composite dark matter candidates and mechanisms that generate the observed similarity between dark and visible matter densities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews models in which a new strongly-coupled gauge interaction confines at low energies, forming a dark sector separate from the Standard Model. These models yield stable dark matter particles in the form of dark mesons, baryons, and glueballs, whose properties arise from the same strong dynamics that govern ordinary hadrons. The review shows how such sectors supply both production mechanisms for the dark matter abundance and discrete symmetries that protect its stability. It maps out correlated signals across direct detection, indirect detection, astrophysical observations, and collider searches. A reader would care because these constructions address the abundance similarity puzzle while opening multiple experimental avenues from a small number of new ingredients.

Core claim

The central claim is that theories with confining dark sectors—new non-Abelian gauge interactions that become strong at low energies—lead to a variety of stable dark matter candidates including dark mesons, baryons, and glueballs, along with mechanisms for generating their abundance and explaining the similarity between dark and visible matter densities. These models also predict correlated signals in multiple experimental channels.

What carries the argument

Confining dark sectors realized by new strongly-coupled non-Abelian gauge interactions, which produce composite states (dark mesons, baryons, glueballs) and discrete symmetries that ensure stability while supplying abundance-generating processes.

If this is right

  • Dark matter need not be elementary but can be composite bound states whose spectrum is calculable from the new gauge dynamics.
  • The similarity between visible and dark matter densities can arise from shared production mechanisms or symmetry relations without additional tuning.
  • Signals in direct detection, colliders, and indirect searches become correlated, so a signal in one channel predicts the strength of signals in others.
  • The same framework can address multiple Standard Model puzzles simultaneously through the new gauge sector.
  • Calculational tools developed for ordinary QCD can be adapted to predict dark sector observables in different coupling regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the framework holds, precision measurements of the dark matter density ratio could directly constrain the new gauge coupling and confinement scale.
  • Hidden valley scenarios at colliders would then be reinterpreted as concrete realizations of confining dark sectors rather than generic hidden sectors.
  • Astrophysical probes of dark matter self-interactions could test the composite nature of the candidates without requiring direct production.
  • The approach suggests that solving the abundance similarity puzzle may simultaneously resolve questions about dark matter stability and detection rates.

Load-bearing premise

That unifying features and calculational techniques apply across the various regimes of the theoretical landscape of confining dark sectors.

What would settle it

A dark matter particle discovered whose mass, spin, and interaction strengths cannot be realized as any composite state of a confining non-Abelian gauge theory, while the cosmic density ratio between dark and visible matter remains unexplained by other means.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30760 by Austin Batz, Graham D. Kribs, Pouya Asadi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of motivations and common features of confining dark sectors. They can be used to solve a variety of theoretical puzzles, and the rich dark hadron spectrum leads to opportunities in theory modeling, exciting experimental signatures, and various naturally stable DM candidates. While the space of theories and applications is vast, commonalities in analysis methods and correlations among experimental… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of some portal interactions that can connect the dark partons to the SM. Crossed dots denote where there may be higher-dimensional operators or mixings inserted. remainder of this section, we focus on the DM candidate as the categorization principle, and each of the other aforementioned schemes is addressed in the following sections. 2.1 Dark Baryons One of the few things we know about the nature … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Different phases of heavy dark quarks (black dots) being trapped in pockets of the deconfined phase (light purple) as the phase transition to the confined phase (dark purple) proceeds. In every single pocket (second row), dark quarks eventually recouple and the pocket shrinks, go through both annihilation and dark baryon DM (orange) formation. Eventually, only a small fraction of quarks in each pocket surv… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic examples of common mediators enabling confined DM to scatter off SM nuclei. scalar technibaryon DM first occurs through the charge-radius interaction. A general low￾energy framework for constraining electromagnetic form factors of DM was developed in Ref. [246]. This analysis provided phenomenological estimates for the electromagnetic form factors for magnetic and electric dipoles, anapole moment… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overview of some portal interactions that can connect dark hadrons either directly or indirectly to the SM, focusing on those relevant to collider phenomenology. Crossed dots denote where there may be higher-dimensional operators or mixings inserted. a chiral anomaly being produced via gluon-gluon or vector boson fusion [47, 91, 337, 338]. A chiral anomaly can also produce a single πD in association with a… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Sketch of mass scale regimes for collider phenomenology in terms of the dark quark mass mq and the dark sector confinement scale ΛD. The characteristic scale of the hard interaction Q is held fixed in the plot, though it can vary event-by-event due to parton distribution functions. The boundaries between regions are blurry and carry some implicit dependence on details such as flavor structure. When mq and … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sketches of how various exotic/long-lived particle collider signatures would look inside the detector, similar to those in Refs. [481, 482]. Solid blue lines denote visible particles (which in some cases must be charged when tracking is essential), dashed black lines denote invisible particles, and dots denote decay vertices. 7 Calculating at Strong Coupling One of the major difficulties in theories involv… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We review theories with confining dark sectors and their implications for dark matter, cosmology, phenomenology, and unsolved Standard Model puzzles. Models with new strongly-coupled non-Abelian gauge interactions can lead to a variety of dark matter candidates (dark mesons, baryons, glueballs, etc.), as well as mechanisms to generate its abundance and symmetries that explain its stability. There are also many potential discovery channels, including direct detection, indirect detection, astrophysical observables, and colliders, as well as correlations between different experiments. We compile a broad conceptual overview of the literature on this topic, aimed at both theorists looking for which questions remain unanswered and experimentalists looking for novel search opportunities. While the theoretical landscape is vast, there are both unifying features and calculational techniques that apply to various regimes. We particularly highlight applications to explaining the similarity of visible and dark matter energy densities, i.e. the $abundance~similarity~puzzle$. We advocate further exploration of this class of theories in the effort to uncover physics beyond the Standard Model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This manuscript reviews theories with confining dark sectors arising from new strongly-coupled non-Abelian gauge interactions. It surveys dark matter candidates including dark mesons, baryons, and glueballs; mechanisms for generating the dark matter abundance; symmetries ensuring stability; and discovery channels spanning direct detection, indirect detection, astrophysical observables, and colliders. The review compiles existing literature, notes correlations between observables, and particularly emphasizes applications to the visible-dark matter abundance similarity puzzle, while identifying unifying features and calculational techniques across regimes.

Significance. If the literature compilation is accurate and reasonably comprehensive, the review provides a useful conceptual map for theorists seeking open questions and for experimentalists identifying novel search strategies. It consolidates a broad class of models under a common framework without introducing new primary calculations.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, final paragraph: the claim that 'unifying features and calculational techniques' apply across regimes is stated at a high level; a brief illustrative example or reference to a specific section would strengthen the point for readers.
  2. [Abstract] The manuscript title and abstract use 'Rich Phenomenology from Simple Ingredients'; consider adding a short footnote or sentence clarifying the scope of 'simple ingredients' (e.g., minimal gauge groups and matter content) to avoid ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including the recognition of its value as a conceptual map for theorists and experimentalists, and for the recommendation to accept. We are pleased that the review is viewed as consolidating the literature on confining dark sectors without introducing new primary calculations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

This is a review paper that compiles and surveys existing literature on confining dark sectors, without presenting original derivations, predictions, equations, or fitted results. The abstract explicitly frames the work as a 'broad conceptual overview of the literature' aimed at highlighting open questions and search opportunities, with no load-bearing claims that reduce to self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains. No derivation chain exists to inspect, so the paper is self-contained as a literature compilation against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review the paper introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it summarizes models already present in the cited literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5714 in / 998 out tokens · 31133 ms · 2026-07-01T01:50:42.759981+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 163 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Dark Matter,

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, “Dark Matter,”arXiv:2406.01705 [hep-ph]. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Cosmological Lower Bound on Heavy Neutrino Masses,

    B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg, “Cosmological Lower Bound on Heavy Neutrino Masses,”Phys. Rev. Lett.39(1977) 165–168. 3

    1977

  3. [3]

    Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, “Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,”Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 127–132. 3

    1983

  4. [4]

    The Waning of the WIMP: Endgame?,

    G. Arcadi, D. Cabo-Almeida, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, J. P. Neto, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, “The Waning of the WIMP: Endgame?,”Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no. 2, 152,arXiv:2403.15860 [hep-ph]. 3

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Searching for the QCD Dark Matter Axion,

    M. Baryakhtar, L. Rosenberg, and G. Rybka, “Searching for the QCD Dark Matter Axion,”arXiv:2504.10607 [hep-ex]. 3

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    TECHNOCOSMOLOGY: COULD A TECHNIBARYON EXCESS PROVIDE A ’NATURAL’ MISSING MASS CANDIDATE?,

    S. Nussinov, “TECHNOCOSMOLOGY: COULD A TECHNIBARYON EXCESS PROVIDE A ’NATURAL’ MISSING MASS CANDIDATE?,”Phys. Lett. B165 (1985) 55–58. 3, 8

    1985

  7. [7]

    TECHNICOLOR COSMOLOGY,

    R. S. Chivukula and T. P. Walker, “TECHNICOLOR COSMOLOGY,”Nucl. Phys. B329(1990) 445–463. 3, 16

    1990

  8. [8]

    Electroweak Fermion Number Violation and the Production of Stable Particles in the Early Universe,

    S. M. Barr, R. S. Chivukula, and E. Farhi, “Electroweak Fermion Number Violation and the Production of Stable Particles in the Early Universe,”Phys. Lett. B241 (1990) 387–391. 3

    1990

  9. [9]

    Detecting technibaryon dark matter,

    J. Bagnasco, M. Dine, and S. D. Thomas, “Detecting technibaryon dark matter,” Phys. Lett. B320(1994) 99–104,arXiv:hep-ph/9310290. 3, 9, 20

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  10. [10]

    Towards working technicolor: Effective theories and dark matter,

    S. B. Gudnason, C. Kouvaris, and F. Sannino, “Towards working technicolor: Effective theories and dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 115003, arXiv:hep-ph/0603014. 3, 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  11. [11]

    Dark Matter from new Technicolor Theories,

    S. B. Gudnason, C. Kouvaris, and F. Sannino, “Dark Matter from new Technicolor Theories,”Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 095008,arXiv:hep-ph/0608055. 3, 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  12. [12]

    Ultra Minimal Technicolor and its Dark Matter TIMP,

    T. A. Ryttov and F. Sannino, “Ultra Minimal Technicolor and its Dark Matter TIMP,”Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 115010,arXiv:0809.0713 [hep-ph]. 3, 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  13. [13]

    Technicolor Dark Matter,

    R. Foadi, M. T. Frandsen, and F. Sannino, “Technicolor Dark Matter,”Phys. Rev. D 80(2009) 037702,arXiv:0812.3406 [hep-ph]. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  14. [14]

    Secluded WIMP Dark Matter,

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, “Secluded WIMP Dark Matter,”Phys. Lett. B662(2008) 53–61,arXiv:0711.4866 [hep-ph]. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  15. [15]

    Atomic Dark Matter,

    D. E. Kaplan, G. Z. Krnjaic, K. R. Rehermann, and C. M. Wells, “Atomic Dark Matter,”JCAP05(2010) 021,arXiv:0909.0753 [hep-ph]. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    LargeN-ightmare Dark Matter,

    L. Morrison, S. Profumo, and D. J. Robinson, “LargeN-ightmare Dark Matter,” JCAP05(2021) 058,arXiv:2010.03586 [hep-ph]. 4, 14, 15, 45 50

    arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Composite Scalar Dark Matter,

    M. Frigerio, A. Pomarol, F. Riva, and A. Urbano, “Composite Scalar Dark Matter,” JHEP07(2012) 015,arXiv:1204.2808 [hep-ph]. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  18. [18]

    Composite Dark Matter and LHC Interplay,

    D. Marzocca and A. Urbano, “Composite Dark Matter and LHC Interplay,”JHEP 07(2014) 107,arXiv:1404.7419 [hep-ph]. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    The Unnatural Composite Higgs,

    J. Barnard, T. Gherghetta, T. S. Ray, and A. Spray, “The Unnatural Composite Higgs,”JHEP01(2015) 067,arXiv:1409.7391 [hep-ph]. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [20]

    A Dark matter candidate with new strong interactions,

    T. Banks, J. D. Mason, and D. O’Neil, “A Dark matter candidate with new strong interactions,”Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 043530,arXiv:hep-ph/0506015. 4, 46

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  21. [21]

    Composite messenger baryon as a cold dark matter,

    K. Hamaguchi, S. Shirai, and T. T. Yanagida, “Composite messenger baryon as a cold dark matter,”Phys. Lett. B654(2007) 110–112,arXiv:0707.2463 [hep-ph]. 4, 46

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  22. [22]

    Decaying Dark Matter Baryons in a Composite Messenger Model,

    K. Hamaguchi, E. Nakamura, S. Shirai, and T. T. Yanagida, “Decaying Dark Matter Baryons in a Composite Messenger Model,”Phys. Lett. B674(2009) 299–302, arXiv:0811.0737 [hep-ph]. 4, 46

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  23. [23]

    Cosmic Signals from the Hidden Sector,

    J. Mardon, Y. Nomura, and J. Thaler, “Cosmic Signals from the Hidden Sector,” Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 035013,arXiv:0905.3749 [hep-ph]. 4, 46

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  24. [24]

    Low-Scale Gauge Mediation and Composite Messenger Dark Matter,

    K. Hamaguchi, E. Nakamura, S. Shirai, and T. T. Yanagida, “Low-Scale Gauge Mediation and Composite Messenger Dark Matter,”JHEP04(2010) 119, arXiv:0912.1683 [hep-ph]. 4, 46

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    A COMPOSITE INVISIBLE AXION,

    J. E. Kim, “A COMPOSITE INVISIBLE AXION,”Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 1733. 4

    1985

  26. [26]

    Composite axion models and Planck scale physics,

    L. Randall, “Composite axion models and Planck scale physics,”Phys. Lett. B284 (1992) 77–80. 4

    1992

  27. [27]

    The Strong CP problem versus Planck scale physics,

    B. A. Dobrescu, “The Strong CP problem versus Planck scale physics,”Phys. Rev. D 55(1997) 5826–5833,arXiv:hep-ph/9609221. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  28. [28]

    Warped axions,

    T. Flacke, B. Gripaios, J. March-Russell, and D. Maybury, “Warped axions,”JHEP 01(2007) 061,arXiv:hep-ph/0611278. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  29. [29]

    Composite Accidental Axions,

    M. Redi and R. Sato, “Composite Accidental Axions,”JHEP05(2016) 104, arXiv:1602.05427 [hep-ph]. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry protected to arbitrary order,

    L. Di Luzio, E. Nardi, and L. Ubaldi, “Accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry protected to arbitrary order,”Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) no. 1, 011801,arXiv:1704.01122 [hep-ph]. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    A Composite Axion from a Supersymmetric Product Group,

    B. Lillard and T. M. P. Tait, “A Composite Axion from a Supersymmetric Product Group,”JHEP11(2017) 005,arXiv:1707.04261 [hep-ph]. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    A High Quality Composite Axion,

    B. Lillard and T. M. P. Tait, “A High Quality Composite Axion,”JHEP11(2018) 199,arXiv:1811.03089 [hep-ph]. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    A Holographic Perspective on the Axion Quality Problem,

    P. Cox, T. Gherghetta, and M. D. Nguyen, “A Holographic Perspective on the Axion Quality Problem,”JHEP01(2020) 188,arXiv:1911.09385 [hep-ph]. 4

    arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    A Composite Higgs with a Heavy Composite Axion,

    T. Gherghetta and M. D. Nguyen, “A Composite Higgs with a Heavy Composite Axion,”JHEP12(2020) 094,arXiv:2007.10875 [hep-ph]. 4 51

    arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Chiral models of composite axions and accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry,

    R. Contino, A. Podo, and F. Revello, “Chiral models of composite axions and accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry,”JHEP04(2022) 180,arXiv:2112.09635 [hep-ph]. 4

    arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    High-quality composite Pati-Salam axion,

    T. Gherghetta, H. Murayama, and P. Qu´ ılez, “High-quality composite Pati-Salam axion,”Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no. 9, 095036,arXiv:2505.08866 [hep-ph]. 4

    arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    A High-Quality Axion from Exact SUSY Chiral Dynamics,

    T. Gherghetta, H. Murayama, B. Noether, and P. Qu´ ılez, “A High-Quality Axion from Exact SUSY Chiral Dynamics,”arXiv:2508.21813 [hep-ph]. 4, 46

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    Axion quality problem: keep calm and baryon,

    P. Agrawal, A. Hook, V. Loladze, and M. Reig, “Axion quality problem: keep calm and baryon,”JHEP03(2026) 041,arXiv:2510.07366 [hep-ph]. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Towards a post-inflationary composite axion model,

    A. Azatov, M. Mahdi Khalil, and M. Suzuki, “Towards a post-inflationary composite axion model,”JHEP03(2026) 143,arXiv:2510.18538 [hep-ph]. 4

    arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Axiverse Baryogenesis,

    P. Asadi, D. Cyncynates, and S. Gori, “Axiverse Baryogenesis,”arXiv:2511.15794 [hep-ph]. 4

    arXiv

  41. [41]

    Hierarchies without symmetries from extra dimensions,

    N. Arkani-Hamed and M. Schmaltz, “Hierarchies without symmetries from extra dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 033005,arXiv:hep-ph/9903417. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  42. [42]

    Fermion masses, mixings and proton decay in a Randall-Sundrum model,

    S. J. Huber and Q. Shafi, “Fermion masses, mixings and proton decay in a Randall-Sundrum model,”Phys. Lett. B498(2001) 256–262, arXiv:hep-ph/0010195. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  43. [43]

    A Model of Lepton Masses from a Warped Extra Dimension,

    C. Csaki, C. Delaunay, C. Grojean, and Y. Grossman, “A Model of Lepton Masses from a Warped Extra Dimension,”JHEP10(2008) 055,arXiv:0806.0356 [hep-ph]. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  44. [44]

    Implications of a Light Higgs in Composite Models,

    M. Redi and A. Tesi, “Implications of a Light Higgs in Composite Models,”JHEP10 (2012) 166,arXiv:1205.0232 [hep-ph]. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  45. [45]

    Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,

    A. D. Sakharov, “Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,”Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5(1967) 32–35. 5

    1967

  46. [46]

    Confined hidden vector dark matter,

    T. Hambye and M. H. G. Tytgat, “Confined hidden vector dark matter,”Phys. Lett. B683(2010) 39–41,arXiv:0907.1007 [hep-ph]. 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    Accidental Composite Dark Matter,

    O. Antipin, M. Redi, A. Strumia, and E. Vigiani, “Accidental Composite Dark Matter,”JHEP07(2015) 039,arXiv:1503.08749 [hep-ph]. 7, 11, 16, 22, 24, 33, 45

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Thermal history of composite dark matter,

    N. A. Dondi, F. Sannino, and J. Smirnov, “Thermal history of composite dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D101(2020) no. 10, 103010,arXiv:1905.08810 [hep-ph]. 7, 31

    arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Surveying the theory space of pion dark matter,

    A. Alfano, N. Evans, S. Kulkarni, and W. Porod, “Surveying the theory space of pion dark matter,”arXiv:2509.04892 [hep-ph]. 7

    arXiv

  50. [50]

    Echoes of a hidden valley at hadron colliders,

    M. J. Strassler and K. M. Zurek, “Echoes of a hidden valley at hadron colliders,” Phys. Lett. B651(2007) 374–379,arXiv:hep-ph/0604261. 7, 32

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  51. [51]

    Light Asymmetric Dark Matter on the Lattice: SU(2) Technicolor with Two Fundamental Flavors,

    R. Lewis, C. Pica, and F. Sannino, “Light Asymmetric Dark Matter on the Lattice: SU(2) Technicolor with Two Fundamental Flavors,”Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 014504, arXiv:1109.3513 [hep-ph]. 9, 43 52

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  52. [52]

    The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  53. [53]

    Anti de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291,arXiv:hep-th/9802150. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  54. [54]

    Holography and phenomenology,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati, and L. Randall, “Holography and phenomenology,” JHEP08(2001) 017,arXiv:hep-th/0012148. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  55. [55]

    Warped unification, proton stability and dark matter,

    K. Agashe and G. Servant, “Warped unification, proton stability and dark matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 231805,arXiv:hep-ph/0403143. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  56. [56]

    Electroweak symmetry breaking and cold dark matter from strongly interacting hidden sector,

    T. Hur, D.-W. Jung, P. Ko, and J. Y. Lee, “Electroweak symmetry breaking and cold dark matter from strongly interacting hidden sector,”Phys. Lett. B696(2011) 262–265,arXiv:0709.1218 [hep-ph]. 9, 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  57. [57]

    Dynamical generation of the weak and Dark Matter scale,

    T. Hambye and A. Strumia, “Dynamical generation of the weak and Dark Matter scale,”Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 055022,arXiv:1306.2329 [hep-ph]. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    Phenomenology of Induced Electroweak Symmetry Breaking,

    S. Chang, J. Galloway, M. Luty, E. Salvioni, and Y. Tsai, “Phenomenology of Induced Electroweak Symmetry Breaking,”JHEP03(2015) 017,arXiv:1411.6023 [hep-ph]. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Quirky Composite Dark Matter,

    G. D. Kribs, T. S. Roy, J. Terning, and K. M. Zurek, “Quirky Composite Dark Matter,”Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 095001,arXiv:0909.2034 [hep-ph]. 9, 16, 23, 31, 39, 41

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  60. [60]

    Weakly Interacting Stable Pions,

    Y. Bai and R. J. Hill, “Weakly Interacting Stable Pions,”Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 111701,arXiv:1005.0008 [hep-ph]. 9, 10 [61]Lattice Strong Dynamics (LSD)Collaboration, T. Appelquistet al., “Lattice Calculation of Composite Dark Matter Form Factors,”Phys. Rev. D88(2013) no. 1, 014502,arXiv:1301.1693 [hep-ph]. 9, 22, 42 [62]LSDCollaboration, T. Appelquistet al...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  61. [61]

    Dynamical generation of the weak and Dark Matter scales from strong interactions,

    O. Antipin, M. Redi, and A. Strumia, “Dynamical generation of the weak and Dark Matter scales from strong interactions,”JHEP01(2015) 157,arXiv:1410.1817 [hep-ph]. 9, 11, 14, 45

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  62. [62]

    Detecting Stealth Dark Matter Directly through Electromagnetic Polarizability,

    T. Appelquistet al., “Detecting Stealth Dark Matter Directly through Electromagnetic Polarizability,”Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) no. 17, 171803, arXiv:1503.04205 [hep-ph]. 9, 22, 43

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [63]

    Stealth Dark Matter: Dark scalar baryons through the Higgs portal,

    T. Appelquistet al., “Stealth Dark Matter: Dark scalar baryons through the Higgs portal,”Phys. Rev. D92(2015) no. 7, 075030,arXiv:1503.04203 [hep-ph]. 9, 14, 23, 33, 42

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  64. [64]

    A scenario of heavy but visible baryonic dark matter,

    R. Huo, S. Matsumoto, Y.-L. Sming Tsai, and T. T. Yanagida, “A scenario of heavy but visible baryonic dark matter,”JHEP09(2016) 162,arXiv:1506.06929 [hep-ph]. 9, 10 53

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    Dark Matter as a weakly coupled Dark Baryon,

    A. Mitridate, M. Redi, J. Smirnov, and A. Strumia, “Dark Matter as a weakly coupled Dark Baryon,”JHEP10(2017) 210,arXiv:1707.05380 [hep-ph]. 9, 10, 11, 14, 23, 24, 30, 42, 45

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  66. [66]

    Composite Dark Matter from Strongly-Interacting Chiral Dynamics,

    R. Contino, A. Podo, and F. Revello, “Composite Dark Matter from Strongly-Interacting Chiral Dynamics,”JHEP02(2021) 091,arXiv:2008.10607 [hep-ph]. 9, 10

    arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Hyperstealth dark matter and long-lived particles,

    G. T. Fleming, G. D. Kribs, E. T. Neil, D. Schaich, and P. M. Vranas, “Hyperstealth dark matter and long-lived particles,”Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no. 7, 075004, arXiv:2412.14540 [hep-ph]. 9, 14, 24, 45

    arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Composite Dark Matter and a horizontal symmetry,

    A. Carvunis, D. Guadagnoli, M. Reboud, and P. Stangl, “Composite Dark Matter and a horizontal symmetry,”JHEP02(2021) 056,arXiv:2007.11931 [hep-ph]. 9

    arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Gauged Flavour for Asymmetric Dark Matter,

    M. Blennow, E. Fernandez-Martinez, D. Garcia-Garcia, and J. M. Lizana, “Gauged Flavour for Asymmetric Dark Matter,”arXiv:2605.20336 [hep-ph]. 9, 32

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    Challenges for models with composite states,

    J. M. Cline, W. Huang, and G. D. Moore, “Challenges for models with composite states,”Phys. Rev. D94(2016) no. 5, 055029,arXiv:1607.07865 [hep-ph]. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  71. [71]

    Colored Dark Matter,

    V. De Luca, A. Mitridate, M. Redi, J. Smirnov, and A. Strumia, “Colored Dark Matter,”Phys. Rev. D97(2018) no. 11, 115024,arXiv:1801.01135 [hep-ph]. 9, 25, 30

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  72. [72]

    Baryons, multihadron systems, and composite dark matter in nonrelativistic QCD,

    B. Assi and M. L. Wagman, “Baryons, multihadron systems, and composite dark matter in nonrelativistic QCD,”Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no. 9, 096004, arXiv:2305.01685 [hep-ph]. 10, 42

    arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    TeV symmetry and the little hierarchy problem,

    H.-C. Cheng and I. Low, “TeV symmetry and the little hierarchy problem,”JHEP 09(2003) 051,arXiv:hep-ph/0308199. 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  74. [74]

    KK Parity in Warped Extra Dimension,

    K. Agashe, A. Falkowski, I. Low, and G. Servant, “KK Parity in Warped Extra Dimension,”JHEP04(2008) 027,arXiv:0712.2455 [hep-ph]. 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  75. [75]

    Probing Dark Forces and Light Hidden Sectors at Low-Energy e+e- Colliders,

    R. Essig, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, “Probing Dark Forces and Light Hidden Sectors at Low-Energy e+e- Colliders,”Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 015003,arXiv:0903.3941 [hep-ph]. 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  76. [76]

    Pionic Dark Matter,

    S. Bhattacharya, B. Meli´ c, and J. Wudka, “Pionic Dark Matter,”JHEP02(2014) 115,arXiv:1307.2647 [hep-ph]. 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  77. [77]

    Composite strongly interacting dark matter,

    J. M. Cline, Z. Liu, G. D. Moore, and W. Xue, “Composite strongly interacting dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D90(2014) no. 1, 015023,arXiv:1312.3325 [hep-ph]. 10, 32

    arXiv 2014

  78. [78]

    Model for Thermal Relic Dark Matter of Strongly Interacting Massive Particles,

    Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, H. Murayama, T. Volansky, and J. G. Wacker, “Model for Thermal Relic Dark Matter of Strongly Interacting Massive Particles,”Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) no. 2, 021301,arXiv:1411.3727 [hep-ph]. 10, 14

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  79. [79]

    Light Chiral Dark Sector,

    K. Harigaya and Y. Nomura, “Light Chiral Dark Sector,”Phys. Rev. D94(2016) no. 3, 035013,arXiv:1603.03430 [hep-ph]. 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  80. [80]

    Impeded Dark Matter,

    J. Kopp, J. Liu, T. R. Slatyer, X.-P. Wang, and W. Xue, “Impeded Dark Matter,” JHEP12(2016) 033,arXiv:1609.02147 [hep-ph]. 10 54

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.