pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20336 · v2 · pith:JSOJVPQUnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ✦ hep-ph

Gauged Flavour for Asymmetric Dark Matter

Mattias Blennow , Enrique Fernandez-Martinez , David Garcia-Garcia , Javier M. Lizana This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 18:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords gauged flavour symmetryasymmetric dark matterleptogenesisflavour sphaleronsfermion mass hierarchiesmirror fermionsSU(3) confinementmeson oscillations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A gauged SO(3) flavour symmetry generates both Standard Model fermion mass hierarchies and the dark matter asymmetry via leptogenesis and sphalerons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out a single mechanism in which a gauged SO(3) symmetry acts on visible and dark sectors alike. Spontaneous breaking of this symmetry produces the observed pattern of fermion masses. Right-handed neutrino decays create a lepton asymmetry that electroweak sphalerons convert into a baryon asymmetry while flavour sphalerons convert part of it into a dark matter asymmetry. Dark matter itself appears as bound states of a new confining SU(3) force. The construction automatically relates the visible and dark matter densities without additional tuning and predicts a set of flavour-violating signals that can be tested at colliders and in meson systems.

Core claim

Spontaneous breaking of a gauged SO(3) flavour symmetry that acts on both visible and dark sectors produces the hierarchical fermion masses of the Standard Model. Decays of right-handed neutrinos generate a primordial lepton asymmetry. Electroweak sphalerons convert part of this asymmetry into a baryon asymmetry while flavour sphalerons redistribute another part into a dark matter asymmetry. Dark matter consists of baryon-like bound states formed by a confining SU(3) gauge force. Anomaly cancellation requires mirror fermions whose seesaw-like mass suppression makes different generations sensitive to different flavour-breaking scales.

What carries the argument

Gauged SO(3) flavour symmetry whose spontaneous breaking generates fermion mass hierarchies and enables flavour sphalerons to redistribute lepton asymmetry into dark matter asymmetry.

If this is right

  • The similar mass scales of baryons and dark matter follow directly from their common origin in the lepton asymmetry.
  • Mirror fermions induce a seesaw suppression so that the highest flavour-breaking scale is probed by K-meson oscillations, the intermediate scale by B_s observables, and the lowest scale by flavour-violating B_s decays and electroweak precision data.
  • Flavour interactions must be sufficiently rapid to eliminate the symmetric dark matter component before the present epoch.
  • Some mirror fermions associated with the lowest breaking scale may lie within reach of future collider searches.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Precision measurements of electroweak observables could indirectly constrain the dark matter asymmetry generation mechanism.
  • The model suggests that searches for new flavour-violating processes at the LHC or future colliders might simultaneously test both the origin of fermion masses and the nature of dark matter.
  • If the lowest scale lies near the TeV range, dedicated searches for mirror fermions could provide a direct test independent of cosmological data.

Load-bearing premise

Flavour sphalerons efficiently convert the lepton asymmetry into a dark matter asymmetry while preserving the numerical relation between visible and dark matter densities without extra washout or entropy production.

What would settle it

Observation that the ratio of dark matter to baryon density deviates from the value fixed by the shared lepton asymmetry, or non-observation of the mirror fermions required by anomaly cancellation at the scales needed for the flavour-breaking pattern.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20336 by David Garcia-Garcia, Enrique Fernandez-Martinez, Javier M. Lizana, Mattias Blennow.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Relevant contributions from the flavour gauge bosons to four-quark operators affecting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Compilation of the bounds on the three scalar VEVs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a framework that links the origin of the Standard Model flavour hierarchies to the generation of asymmetric dark matter via leptogenesis. The key new ingredient is a gauged $SO(3)$ flavour symmetry acting on both the visible and dark sectors, whose spontaneous breaking generates fermion mass hierarchies. Right-handed neutrino decays produce a primordial lepton asymmetry, which is redistributed into baryon and dark matter asymmetries by electroweak and flavour sphalerons respectively. Dark matter arises as baryon-like bound states of a confining $SU(3)$, providing a natural rationale for the similar mass scales of visible and dark matter. We analyze flavour, collider, electroweak, and cosmological constraints. Anomaly cancellation requires the presence of mirror fermions, inducing a seesaw-like suppression of new physics effects in the lighter generations, such that different observables are sensitive to different flavour-breaking scales. Meson oscillations provide the dominant constraints, with $K$ and $B_s$ observables constraining the highest and intermediate scales, while the lowest scale may place some mirror fermions potentially within reach of future collider searches and is currently probed by flavour violating $B_s$ decays and electroweak observables. Flavour interactions are also bounded from below by the requirement of a sufficiently fast decay of the symmetric dark matter component, leading to a tightly constrained and predictive scenario testable through several complementary probes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a framework linking Standard Model flavour hierarchies to asymmetric dark matter generation via leptogenesis. A gauged SO(3) flavour symmetry acts on both visible and dark sectors; its spontaneous breaking produces fermion mass hierarchies. Right-handed neutrino decays generate a lepton asymmetry that electroweak and flavour sphalerons redistribute into baryon and dark-matter asymmetries, with dark matter realized as baryon-like bound states under a confining SU(3). Anomaly cancellation requires mirror fermions whose effects are suppressed in lighter generations by a seesaw-like mechanism. The model is subjected to flavour, collider, electroweak and cosmological constraints, with meson oscillations providing the dominant bounds and the lowest flavour-breaking scale potentially accessible at future colliders.

Significance. If the sphaleron redistribution operates quantitatively as claimed, the construction would supply a unified dynamical origin for both the flavour structure and the observed Ω_DM/Ω_b ratio, with the confining SU(3) furnishing a natural explanation for the comparable mass scales. The mirror-fermion sector with scale-dependent suppression is a distinctive feature that renders the scenario testable across multiple complementary probes.

major comments (3)
  1. [cosmological constraints section] The central claim that flavour sphalerons efficiently transfer the lepton asymmetry into a dark-sector asymmetry while preserving Ω_DM/Ω_b ≈ 5 without significant washout or entropy dilution is load-bearing, yet the cosmological-constraints section supplies no Boltzmann-equation solutions, sphaleron-rate estimates, or numerical integration demonstrating that the three flavour-breaking scales and mirror fermions do not induce additional washout channels.
  2. [asymmetry redistribution discussion] The assertion that the confining SU(3) dynamics and flavour sphalerons together produce the required asymmetry matching rests on the introduction of these processes within the model rather than on independent prior results or explicit rate calculations; this circularity risk affects the quantitative viability of the density relation.
  3. [anomaly cancellation and mirror fermions paragraph] Anomaly cancellation is stated to require mirror fermions whose seesaw-like suppression protects lighter generations, but the manuscript does not quantify how these states modify the sphaleron equilibrium conditions or introduce new washout processes, which is essential for the asymmetry-matching claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [phenomenological constraints] Notation for the three distinct flavour-breaking scales is introduced without a compact table or explicit numerical example relating each scale to the constrained observables (K, B_s, electroweak).
  2. [cosmological constraints] The abstract states that flavour interactions are bounded from below by the decay of the symmetric dark-matter component, but the corresponding lower bound is not displayed as a numerical range or inequality in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will be made to strengthen the presentation of the cosmological aspects of the model.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [cosmological constraints section] The central claim that flavour sphalerons efficiently transfer the lepton asymmetry into a dark-sector asymmetry while preserving Ω_DM/Ω_b ≈ 5 without significant washout or entropy dilution is load-bearing, yet the cosmological-constraints section supplies no Boltzmann-equation solutions, sphaleron-rate estimates, or numerical integration demonstrating that the three flavour-breaking scales and mirror fermions do not induce additional washout channels.

    Authors: We agree that the cosmological-constraints section would benefit from more explicit support. The current text relies on analytical estimates of the sphaleron rates and equilibrium conditions based on the hierarchy of the three flavour-breaking scales. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection containing order-of-magnitude sphaleron-rate calculations (following standard methods in the leptogenesis literature) and a brief discussion showing that the mirror fermions, being decoupled below the highest breaking scale, do not open new washout channels or induce entropy dilution that would alter the Ω_DM/Ω_b ratio. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [asymmetry redistribution discussion] The assertion that the confining SU(3) dynamics and flavour sphalerons together produce the required asymmetry matching rests on the introduction of these processes within the model rather than on independent prior results or explicit rate calculations; this circularity risk affects the quantitative viability of the density relation.

    Authors: The asymmetry redistribution follows from the standard equilibrium conditions of electroweak sphalerons together with flavour sphalerons whose rates are determined by the gauged SO(3) interactions; these rates are independent of the confining SU(3) dynamics that only set the DM mass scale. We will strengthen the discussion by adding explicit references to existing calculations of flavour sphaleron rates in gauged-flavour models and by including a short appendix derivation of the equilibrium relations that yield the observed density ratio. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [anomaly cancellation and mirror fermions paragraph] Anomaly cancellation is stated to require mirror fermions whose seesaw-like suppression protects lighter generations, but the manuscript does not quantify how these states modify the sphaleron equilibrium conditions or introduce new washout processes, which is essential for the asymmetry-matching claim.

    Authors: The mirror fermions are required for anomaly cancellation and their contributions are suppressed by the seesaw-like mechanism for the lighter generations. In the revision we will expand the relevant paragraph with a quantitative estimate demonstrating that, owing to their masses being above the sphaleron decoupling temperature, they neither shift the equilibrium conditions nor generate additional washout processes at the temperatures relevant for asymmetry transfer. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model construction is self-contained

full rationale

The provided abstract and description present a new model-building proposal that introduces gauged SO(3) flavour symmetry, mirror fermions for anomaly cancellation, and a confining SU(3) for DM as model ingredients. The lepton asymmetry generation and redistribution via sphalerons are stated as consequences of these dynamics, with subsequent constraint analysis. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains are exhibited that reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. The derivation chain does not loop; it is a standard proposal of new physics with external constraints applied.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 3 invented entities

The model introduces a gauged SO(3) flavour symmetry, a confining SU(3) for dark matter, and mirror fermions required by anomaly cancellation; these are postulated rather than derived from prior literature. The redistribution of asymmetry via flavour sphalerons is an additional domain assumption.

free parameters (1)
  • flavour-breaking scales
    Multiple scales at which the SO(3) symmetry breaks are chosen to satisfy meson oscillation constraints and to place some mirror fermions within collider reach.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Anomaly cancellation requires the presence of mirror fermions.
    Stated in the abstract as a necessary condition for the gauged symmetry.
  • domain assumption Flavour sphalerons redistribute the lepton asymmetry into a dark matter asymmetry.
    Central to the asymmetry generation mechanism described in the abstract.
invented entities (3)
  • Gauged SO(3) flavour symmetry no independent evidence
    purpose: Generates fermion mass hierarchies and acts on both visible and dark sectors.
    New symmetry postulated to link flavour and dark matter.
  • Confining SU(3) for dark matter no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides baryon-like bound states as dark matter candidates with mass scale similar to visible baryons.
    Introduced to explain the similar mass scales of visible and dark matter.
  • Mirror fermions no independent evidence
    purpose: Cancel anomalies induced by the gauged flavour symmetry.
    Required for mathematical consistency; induce seesaw-like suppression.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5776 in / 1757 out tokens · 27219 ms · 2026-06-30T18:01:50.555834+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Anatomy and Phenomenology of Minimal Flavor Deconstruction in the Lepton Sector

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Next-to-leading order spurion effects in a minimal lepton flavor deconstruction model induce observable charged lepton flavor violation, lepton flavor universality violation, and electric dipole moments at multi-10 Te...

  2. Rich Phenomenology from Simple Ingredients: A Review of Confining Dark Sectors

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Review of confining dark sectors summarizing dark matter candidates, abundance mechanisms, discovery channels, and applications to the abundance similarity puzzle.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 32 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of10 9 Muon Decays?,Phys

    P. Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of10 9 Muon Decays?,Phys. Lett. B67(1977) 421–428

    1977

  2. [2]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation,Phys. Rev. Lett.44(1980) 912

    1980

  3. [3]

    Yanagida,Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos,Conf

    T. Yanagida,Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos,Conf. Proc. C7902131 (1979) 95–99

    1979

  4. [4]

    Complex Spinors and Unified Theories

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky,Complex Spinors and Unified Theories,Conf. Proc. C790927(1979) 315–321, [arXiv:1306.4669]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1979

  5. [5]

    Fukugita and T

    M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida,Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification,Phys. Lett. B174 (1986) 45–47

    1986

  6. [6]

    Nussinov,TECHNOCOSMOLOGY: COULD A TECHNIBARYON EXCESS PROVIDE A ’NATURAL’ MISSING MASS CANDIDATE?,Phys

    S. Nussinov,TECHNOCOSMOLOGY: COULD A TECHNIBARYON EXCESS PROVIDE A ’NATURAL’ MISSING MASS CANDIDATE?,Phys. Lett. B165(1985) 55–58

    1985

  7. [7]

    S. M. Barr, R. S. Chivukula, and E. Farhi,Electroweak Fermion Number Violation and the Production of Stable Particles in the Early Universe,Phys. Lett. B241(1990) 387–391

    1990

  8. [8]

    S. M. Barr,Baryogenesis, sphalerons and the cogeneration of dark matter,Phys. Rev. D44 (1991) 3062–3066

    1991

  9. [9]

    D. B. Kaplan,A Single explanation for both the baryon and dark matter densities,Phys. Rev. Lett.68(1992) 741–743

    1992

  10. [10]

    On Relating the Genesis of Cosmic Baryons and Dark Matter

    H. Davoudiasl and R. N. Mohapatra,On Relating the Genesis of Cosmic Baryons and Dark Matter,New J. Phys.14(2012) 095011, [arXiv:1203.1247]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    Review of asymmetric dark matter

    K. Petraki and R. R. Volkas,Review of asymmetric dark matter,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28 (2013) 1330028, [arXiv:1305.4939]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    K. M. Zurek,Asymmetric Dark Matter: Theories, Signatures, and Constraints,Phys. Rept. 537(2014) 91–121, [arXiv:1308.0338]. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    P.-H. Gu, U. Sarkar, and X. Zhang,Visible and Dark Matter Genesis and Cosmic Positron/Electron Excesses,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 076003, [arXiv:0906.3103]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  14. [14]

    Common Origin of Visible and Dark Universe

    P.-H. Gu and U. Sarkar,Common Origin of Visible and Dark Universe,Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 033001, [arXiv:0909.5463]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    Leptogenesis as a Common Origin for Matter and Dark Matter

    H. An, S.-L. Chen, R. N. Mohapatra, and Y. Zhang,Leptogenesis as a Common Origin for Matter and Dark Matter,JHEP03(2010) 124, [arXiv:0911.4463]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    E. J. Chun,Leptogenesis origin of Dirac gaugino dark matter,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 053004, [arXiv:1009.0983]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    Aidnogenesis via Leptogenesis and Dark Sphalerons

    M. Blennow, B. Dasgupta, E. Fernandez-Martinez, and N. Rius,Aidnogenesis via Leptogenesis and Dark Sphalerons,JHEP03(2011) 014, [arXiv:1009.3159]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    Asymmetric Dark Matter from Leptogenesis

    A. Falkowski, J. T. Ruderman, and T. Volansky,Asymmetric Dark Matter from Leptogenesis, JHEP05(2011) 106, [arXiv:1101.4936]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    Dark matter assisted Dirac leptogenesis and neutrino mass

    N. Narendra, N. Sahoo, and N. Sahu,Dark matter assisted Dirac leptogenesis and neutrino mass,Nucl. Phys. B936(2018) 76–90, [arXiv:1712.02960]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Narendra, S

    N. Narendra, S. Patra, N. Sahu, and S. Shil,Baryogenesis via Leptogenesis from Asymmetric Dark Matter and radiatively generated Neutrino mass,Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 9 095016, [arXiv:1805.04860]

    work page arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Narendra, S

    N. Narendra, S. Patra, N. Sahu, and S. Shil,Baryogenesis via Leptogenesis from Asymmetric Dark Matter Using Higher Dimension Operator,Springer Proc. Phys.234(2019) 335–340

    2019

  22. [22]

    Dutta, N

    M. Dutta, N. Narendra, N. Sahu, and S. Shil,Asymmetric self-interacting dark matter via Dirac leptogenesis,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 9 095017, [arXiv:2202.04704]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Mahapatra, P

    S. Mahapatra, P. K. Paul, N. Sahu, and P. Shukla,Asymmetric long-lived dark matter and leptogenesis from the type-III seesaw framework,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 1 015043, [arXiv:2305.11138]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, P. K. Paul, N. Sahu, and P. Shukla,Asymmetric self-interacting dark matter with a canonical seesaw model,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 3 035033, [arXiv:2404.14912]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Takahashi and J

    H. Takahashi and J. Wada,Asymmetric Dark Matter from Low-Scale Spontaneous Leptogenesis,arXiv:2601.01849

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Li and E

    X. Li and E. Ma,Gauge Model of Generation Nonuniversality,Phys. Rev. Lett.47(1981) 1788

    1981

  27. [27]

    A three-site gauge model for flavor hierarchies and flavor anomalies

    M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martin, and G. Isidori,A three-site gauge model for flavor hierarchies and flavor anomalies,Phys. Lett. B779(2018) 317–323, [arXiv:1712.01368]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    Fern´ andez Navarro and S

    M. Fernández Navarro and S. F. King,Tri-hypercharge: a separate gauged weak hypercharge for each fermion family as the origin of flavour,JHEP08(2023) 020, [arXiv:2305.07690]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Capdevila, A

    B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, J. M. Lizana, and S. Pokorski,SU(2)L deconstruction and flavour (non)-universality,JHEP08(2024) 031, [arXiv:2401.00848]. 20

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Fuentes-Martín and J

    J. Fuentes-Martín and J. M. Lizana,Deconstructing flavor anomalously,JHEP07(2024) 117, [arXiv:2402.09507]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Covone, J

    S. Covone, J. Davighi, G. Isidori, and M. Pesut,Flavour deconstructing the composite Higgs, JHEP01(2025) 041, [arXiv:2407.10950]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Fabri, G

    N. Fabri, G. Isidori, and D. Racco,Probing Flavour Deconstruction via Primordial Gravitational Waves,arXiv:2509.12414

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Davighi and G

    J. Davighi and G. Isidori,A Composite Theory of Higgs and Flavour,arXiv:2512.19650

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    D. B. Kaplan,Flavor at SSC energies: A New mechanism for dynamically generated fermion masses,Nucl. Phys. B365(1991) 259–278

    1991

  35. [35]

    Neutrino masses and mixings in non-factorizable geometry

    Y. Grossman and M. Neubert,Neutrino masses and mixings in nonfactorizable geometry, Phys. Lett. B474(2000) 361–371, [hep-ph/9912408]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  36. [36]

    Bulk Fields and Supersymmetry in a Slice of AdS

    T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol,Bulk fields and supersymmetry in a slice of AdS,Nucl. Phys. B586(2000) 141–162, [hep-ph/0003129]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  37. [37]

    Z. G. Berezhiani and R. Rattazzi,Inverse hierarchy approach to fermion masses,Nucl. Phys. B407(1993) 249–270, [hep-ph/9212245]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  38. [38]

    Fermion masses and mixings in a flavour symmetric GUT

    R. Barbieri, G. R. Dvali, and A. Strumia,Fermion masses and mixings in a flavor symmetric GUT,Nucl. Phys. B435(1995) 102–114, [hep-ph/9407239]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  39. [39]

    Flavor hierarchies from dynamical scales

    G. Panico and A. Pomarol,Flavor hierarchies from dynamical scales,JHEP07(2016) 097, [arXiv:1603.06609]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    Fuentes-Martin, G

    J. Fuentes-Martin, G. Isidori, J. M. Lizana, N. Selimovic, and B. A. Stefanek,Flavor hierarchies, flavor anomalies, and Higgs mass from a warped extra dimension,Phys. Lett. B 834(2022) 137382, [arXiv:2203.01952]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen,Hierarchy of Quark Masses, Cabibbo Angles and CP Violation,Nucl. Phys. B147(1979) 277–298

    1979

  42. [42]

    S. F. King and G. G. Ross,Fermion masses and mixing angles from SU (3) family symmetry and unification,Phys. Lett. B574(2003) 239–252, [hep-ph/0307190]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  43. [43]

    R. T. D’Agnolo and D. M. Straub,Gauged flavour symmetry for the light generations,JHEP 05(2012) 034, [arXiv:1202.4759]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  44. [44]

    Greljo and A

    A. Greljo and A. E. Thomsen,Rising through the ranks: flavor hierarchies from a gauged SU(2) symmetry,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024), no. 2 213, [arXiv:2309.11547]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Greljo, A

    A. Greljo, A. E. Thomsen, and H. Tiblom,Flavor hierarchies from SU(2) flavor and quark-lepton unification,JHEP08(2024) 143, [arXiv:2406.02687]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Low Scale Flavor Gauge Symmetries

    B. Grinstein, M. Redi, and G. Villadoro,Low Scale Flavor Gauge Symmetries,JHEP11 (2010) 067, [arXiv:1009.2049]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    Gauged Lepton Flavour

    R. Alonso, E. Fernandez Martinez, M. B. Gavela, B. Grinstein, L. Merlo, and P. Quilez, Gauged Lepton Flavour,JHEP12(2016) 119, [arXiv:1609.05902]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Antusch, A

    S. Antusch, A. Greljo, B. A. Stefanek, and A. E. Thomsen,U(2) Is Right for Leptons and Left for Quarks,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024), no. 15 151802, [arXiv:2311.09288]. 21

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    J. M. Lizana,A common origin of the Higgs boson and the flavor hierarchies,JHEP05 (2025) 176, [arXiv:2412.14243]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    On The Potential of Minimal Flavour Violation

    R. Alonso, M. B. Gavela, L. Merlo, and S. Rigolin,On the scalar potential of minimal flavour violation,JHEP07(2011) 012, [arXiv:1103.2915]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  51. [51]

    Celis, J

    A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martín, A. Vicente, and J. Virto,DsixTools: the standard model effective field theory toolkit,The European Physical Journal C77(2017)

    2017

  52. [52]

    Fuentes-Martín, P

    J. Fuentes-Martín, P. Ruiz-Femenía, A. Vicente, and J. Virto,DsixTools 2.0: the effective field theory toolkit,The European Physical Journal C81(2021)

    2021

  53. [53]

    Model-independent constraints on Delta F=2 operators and the scale of New Physics

    “Flavor Constraints on new physics.”https://agenda.infn.it/event/14377/ contributions/24434/attachments/17481/19830/silvestriniLaThuile.pdf. La Thuile 2018. [54]UTfitCollaboration, M. Bona et al.,Model-independent constraints on∆F= 2operators and the scale of new physics,JHEP03(2008) 049, [arXiv:0707.0636]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Weak Decays Beyond Leading Logarithms

    G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher,Weak Decays beyond Leading Logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys.68(1996) 1125–1144, [hep-ph/9512380]. [56]LHCbCollaboration, R. Aaij et al.,Precise determination of theB 0 s–B 0 s oscillation frequency,Nature Phys.18(2022), no. 1 1–5, [arXiv:2104.04421]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  55. [55]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Kirk, A. Lenz, and T. Rauh,∆Ms theory precision confronts flavour anomalies,JHEP12(2019) 009, [arXiv:1909.11087]

    work page arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Detailed calculation of lepton flavor violating muon-electron conversion rate for various nuclei

    R. Kitano, M. Koike, and Y. Okada,Detailed calculation of lepton flavor violating muon electron conversion rate for various nuclei,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 096002, [hep-ph/0203110]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 76, 059902 (2007)]. [59]SINDRUM IICollaboration, W. H. Bertl et al.,A Search for muon to electron conversion in muonic gold,Eur. Phys. J. C47(2006) 337–346. [...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  57. [57]

    Bresó-Pla, A

    V. Bresó-Pla, A. Falkowski, and M. González-Alonso,AF B in the SMEFT: precision Z physics at the LHC,JHEP08(2021) 021, [arXiv:2103.12074]. [65]ATLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Climbing to the Top of the ATLAS 13 TeV data,Phys. Rept.1116(2025) 127–183, [arXiv:2404.10674]. 22

    work page arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Cornet-Gomez, V

    F. Cornet-Gomez, V. Miralles, M. Miralles López, M. Moreno Llácer, and M. Vos,Future collider constraints on top-quark operators,JHEP10(2025) 156, [arXiv:2503.11518]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott,Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence,JHEP01(2014) 035, [arXiv:1310.4838]

    work page arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP1 and LEP2

    R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi, and A. Strumia,Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2,Nucl. Phys. B703(2004) 127–146, [hep-ph/0405040]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  61. [61]

    Bagnaschi, J

    E. Bagnaschi, J. Ellis, M. Madigan, K. Mimasu, V. Sanz, and T. You,SMEFT analysis of mW,JHEP08(2022) 308, [arXiv:2204.05260]

    work page arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    B. A. Erdelyi, R. Gröber, and N. Selimovic,How large can the light quark Yukawa couplings be?,JHEP05(2025) 189, [arXiv:2410.08272]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Allwicher, C

    L. Allwicher, C. Cornella, G. Isidori, and B. A. Stefanek,New physics in the third generation. A comprehensive SMEFT analysis and future prospects,JHEP03(2024) 049, [arXiv:2311.00020]. [72]Mu3eCollaboration, G. Hesketh, S. Hughes, A.-K. Perrevoort, and N. Rompotis,The Mu3e Experiment, inSnowmass 2021, 4, 2022.arXiv:2204.00001

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    The Sphaleron Rate in the Minimal Standard Model

    M. D’Onofrio, K. Rummukainen, and A. Tranberg,Sphaleron Rate in the Minimal Standard Model,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014), no. 14 141602, [arXiv:1404.3565]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  65. [65]

    J. A. Harvey and M. S. Turner,Cosmological Baryon and Lepton Number in the Presence of Electroweak Fermion Number Violation,Phys. Rev. D42(1990) 3344–3349. [75]PlanckCollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1990

  66. [66]

    Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis and Hadronic Decay of Long-Lived Massive Particles

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and T. Moroi,Big-Bang nucleosynthesis and hadronic decay of long-lived massive particles,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 083502, [astro-ph/0408426]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  67. [67]

    Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure

    S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu,Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure,Phys. Rept. 730(2018) 1–57, [arXiv:1705.02358]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  68. [68]

    Adhikari et al.,Astrophysical tests of dark matter self-interactions,Rev

    S. Adhikari et al.,Astrophysical tests of dark matter self-interactions,Rev. Mod. Phys.97 (2025), no. 4 045004, [arXiv:2207.10638]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    de Blas et al

    J. de Blas et al.,Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics,arXiv:2511.03883. [80]BNLCollaboration, D. Ambrose et al.,New limit on muon and electron lepton number violation from K0(L) —>mu+- e-+ decay,Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 5734–5737, [hep-ex/9811038]

    work page arXiv 2026

  70. [70]

    Low-energy signatures of the $\mathrm{PS}^3$ model: from $B$-physics anomalies to LFV

    M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martín, and G. Isidori,Low-energy signatures of thePS3 model: fromB-physics anomalies to LFV,JHEP10(2018) 148, [arXiv:1805.09328]. [82]LHCbCollaboration, R. Aaij et al.,Search for the lepton-flavour-violating decays B0 s →τ ±µ∓ andB 0 →τ ±µ∓,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019), no. 21 211801, [arXiv:1905.06614]. 23 [83]Belle, Bel...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    Lepton Flavor Violation in the Standard Model with general Dimension-Six Operators

    A. Crivellin, S. Najjari, and J. Rosiek,Lepton Flavor Violation in the Standard Model with general Dimension-Six Operators,JHEP04(2014) 167, [arXiv:1312.0634]. [85]HFLAVCollaboration, Y. S. Amhis et al.,Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, andτ-lepton properties as of 2018,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021), no. 3 226, [arXiv:1909.12524]. [86]SINDRUMCollaboration, U. Bel...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  72. [72]

    Isidori, Z

    G. Isidori, Z. Polonsky, and A. Tinari,Semi-inclusive b→sℓ¯ℓtransitions at high q2,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 9 093008, [arXiv:2305.03076]. [88]Particle Data GroupCollaboration, S. Navas et al.,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 3 030001

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Czaja and M

    M. Czaja and M. Misiak,Current Status of the Standard Model Prediction for the Bs → µ+µ− Branching Ratio,Symmetry16(2024), no. 7 917, [arXiv:2407.03810]. 24

    work page arXiv 2024