pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31327 · v1 · pith:7ZXHY6CEnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ⚛️ nucl-th · astro-ph.HE· hep-th· physics.plasm-ph

Relativistic magnetohydrodynamics from kinetic theory

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 03:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th astro-ph.HEhep-thphysics.plasm-ph
keywords relativistic magnetohydrodynamicskinetic theorydissipative hydrodynamicsquark-gluon plasmaelectromagnetic fieldsBoltzmann-Vlasov equation14-moment approximationheavy-ion collisions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Starting from the relativistic Boltzmann-Vlasov equation, a 14-moment truncation yields causal second-order hydrodynamic equations that incorporate electromagnetic fields into dissipative plasma flows.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The work establishes a systematic kinetic derivation of relativistic dissipative magnetohydrodynamics for plasmas under strong electromagnetic fields. It begins with the Boltzmann-Vlasov equation and applies the method of moments in the 14-moment approximation to obtain equations that remain causal while including the Lorentz force. The derivation first treats a non-resistive two-component plasma of oppositely charged particles, where the magnetic field couples the dissipative currents of each species and produces relative flows together with modified shear dynamics. It then extends the treatment to the resistive case, in which a dynamically evolving electric field couples to charge diffusion and shear stress, generating current-shear feedback and transient momentum anisotropy. A sympathetic reader would care because the resulting equations supply a microscopic foundation for modeling how electromagnetic fields alter transport and flow evolution in systems such as the quark-gluon plasma formed in heavy-ion collisions.

Core claim

The thesis derives causal second-order hydrodynamic equations for relativistic plasmas with electromagnetic fields by applying the 14-moment approximation to the relativistic Boltzmann-Vlasov equation. For a non-resistive two-component plasma the magnetic field couples the dissipative sectors of the two species, producing relative dissipative currents and coupled shear dynamics; Bjorken expansion then yields damped oscillations in the transverse shear sector linked to cyclotron motion. In the resistive case the electric field evolves dynamically and couples to charge diffusion and shear stress, revealing current-shear feedback, transient electromagnetic generation of momentum anisotropy, and

What carries the argument

The 14-moment approximation applied to the relativistic Boltzmann-Vlasov equation that includes the Lorentz force term, which modifies the moment hierarchy and couples dissipative currents across species.

If this is right

  • The magnetic field couples the dissipative sectors of oppositely charged species, producing relative dissipative currents absent in field-free hydrodynamics.
  • In Bjorken expansion the non-resistive theory predicts damped oscillations in the transverse shear sector associated with cyclotron motion.
  • In the resistive case the dynamic electric field generates current-shear feedback that produces transient momentum anisotropy.
  • Electromagnetic and resistive effects modify the time evolution of both homogeneous and expanding plasmas beyond the predictions of standard dissipative hydrodynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could be used to incorporate electromagnetic back-reaction consistently into hydrodynamic simulations of heavy-ion collisions.
  • Resistive effects may produce observable modifications to flow harmonics or particle spectra that standard non-resistive models miss.
  • Testing the truncation by comparing predicted cyclotron frequencies against kinetic simulations in controlled geometries would directly probe the approximation's range of validity.

Load-bearing premise

The 14-moment truncation remains adequate when electromagnetic fields are present and the plasma is treated as a two-component system of oppositely charged particles.

What would settle it

Numerical solution of the derived equations for a Bjorken-expanding resistive plasma compared against full kinetic simulations of the same initial conditions would show whether the predicted current-shear feedback and oscillation frequencies match.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31327 by Khwahish Kushwah.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1: Schematic phase diagram of QCD matter in the plane of temperature and net [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_1_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.2. Figure 1.2: Schematic space-time evolution of an ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collision. Af [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.3
Figure 1.3. Figure 1.3: Geometric origin of anisotropic flow in a non-central heavy-ion collision. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_1_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.4
Figure 1.4. Figure 1.4: Elliptic flow coefficient v2 as a function of transverse momentum pT for iden￾tified hadrons in Au+Au collisions at √ sNN = 200 GeV. The sizeable measured values of v2 and their comparison with ideal hydrodynamic calculations provide evidence for strong collective behaviour and very small shear viscosity in the quark-gluon plasma. Data from Ref. [21]. 1.3 Relativistic hydrodynamics as the language of the… view at source ↗
Figure 1.5
Figure 1.5. Figure 1.5: Non-central heavy-ion collision with spectator protons moving past the in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_1_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: Magnetic-field dependence of the discriminants [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p109_5_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2: Magnetic-field dependence of the complex frequencies in the homogeneous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p109_5_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.3. Figure 5.3: Semi-transverse and transverse relaxation time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p113_5_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.4
Figure 5.4. Figure 5.4: Time evolution of the longitudinal and transverse components of the shear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p120_5_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.5
Figure 5.5. Figure 5.5: Time evolution of the longitudinal and ⊥⊥ components of the shear-stress tensor in Bjorken flow, obtained from the full coupled equations for the total and relative shear sectors, for several values of the initial magnetic field B0. All simulations are performed with η/s = 1. The magnetic field modifies both sectors, but the effect remains comparatively modest because the microscopic relaxation time is s… view at source ↗
Figure 5.6
Figure 5.6. Figure 5.6: Time evolution of the longitudinal and ⊥⊥ components of the shear-stress tensor in Bjorken flow, obtained from the full coupled equations for the total and relative shear sectors, for several values of the initial magnetic field B0. All simulations are performed with η/s = 10. In this case the ⊥⊥ sector develops clearly visible damped oscillations, while the longitudinal component remains comparatively l… view at source ↗
Figure 5.7
Figure 5.7. Figure 5.7: Time evolution of the dimensionless parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p124_5_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.8
Figure 5.8. Figure 5.8: Longitudinal and ⊥⊥ components of the shear-stress tensor as functions of τ/τR, compared with their respective Navier–Stokes limits, for several values of the initial magnetic field B0. At late times both sectors approach their Navier–Stokes behavior, although the ⊥⊥ component may do so through damped oscillations. time-domain behavior seen in the Bjorken solutions. This is also the right place to emphas… view at source ↗
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1: Time evolution of the unnormalized diffusion current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p148_6_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.2
Figure 6.2. Figure 6.2: Time evolution of the normalized current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p149_6_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.3
Figure 6.3. Figure 6.3: Time evolution of the diffusion current Vq,x(t) for different values of η/s, with fixed |q| = 1, σT = 0.1 σ +− T , and E0 = 30 fm−2 . Increasing η/s weakens collisional damping and leads to oscillatory relaxation, whereas smaller η/s gives a smooth exponentially damped profile. considerably weaker because the electric field decays much faster in a rapidly expanding background. We work in Milne coordinate… view at source ↗
Figure 6.4
Figure 6.4. Figure 6.4: Time evolution of the normalized shear-stress component [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p151_6_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.5
Figure 6.5. Figure 6.5: Time evolution of the charge-diffusion current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p153_6_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This thesis develops a kinetic-theory framework for relativistic dissipative magnetohydrodynamics under strong electromagnetic fields, motivated by quark-gluon plasma in heavy-ion collisions. Starting from the relativistic Boltzmann-Vlasov equation and using the method of moments within the 14-moment approximation, it derives causal second-order hydrodynamic equations for relativistic plasmas with increasing generality. The work first review relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics and its kinetic foundations, emphasizing the need for Israel-Stewart-type transient theories to preserve causality and stability. Electromagnetic fields are then introduced at the microscopic level, where the Lorentz force modifies the moment hierarchy and produces anisotropic transport effects absent in field-free fluids. Next, it develops relativistic dissipative magnetohydrodynamics for a non-resistive two-component plasma of oppositely charged particles. Here, the magnetic field couples the dissipative sectors of the two species, generating relative dissipative currents and coupled shear dynamics. For Bjorken expansion, the theory predicts damped oscillations in the transverse shear sector associated with cyclotron motion. Finally, the thesis treats the resistive two-component case, where the electric field evolves dynamically and couples to charge diffusion and shear stress. The resulting theory reveals current-shear feedback, transient electromagnetic generation of momentum anisotropy, and underdamped dissipative oscillations. Applications to homogeneous and Bjorken-expanding plasmas show how resistive and electromagnetic effects modify evolution beyond standard hydrodynamics. Overall, the thesis extends relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics to magnetized and resistive plasmas, providing a microscopic foundation for future studies of strongly magnetized quark-gluon plasma and astrophysical systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. This thesis derives causal second-order relativistic dissipative magnetohydrodynamic equations for plasmas in strong electromagnetic fields from the relativistic Boltzmann-Vlasov equation. It employs the method of moments with the 14-moment approximation, first for a non-resistive two-component plasma of oppositely charged particles (yielding coupled dissipative currents and shear dynamics) and then for the resistive case (including current-shear feedback and transient electromagnetic generation of momentum anisotropy). Applications to homogeneous and Bjorken-expanding plasmas predict damped cyclotron oscillations and modifications to evolution beyond standard hydrodynamics.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a microscopic kinetic foundation for Israel-Stewart-type dissipative MHD in relativistic settings, extending field-free hydrodynamics to include Lorentz-force modifications, two-species coupling, and resistive effects. This is relevant for modeling magnetized quark-gluon plasma in heavy-ion collisions and astrophysical plasmas. The systematic moment closure from the Boltzmann-Vlasov equation is a clear strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (method of moments and two-component plasma)] Abstract (paragraph on method of moments and two-component plasma): the central claim that the 14-moment truncation yields valid causal equations rests on the assumption that the Lorentz force and two-species coupling do not populate higher moments sufficiently to alter transport coefficients or causality structure. No verification is indicated (e.g., moment convergence tests or direct numerical solution of the underlying kinetic equation for the Bjorken or homogeneous setups used in the applications).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the work's significance and for the constructive major comment. We address it point by point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract (paragraph on method of moments and two-component plasma): the central claim that the 14-moment truncation yields valid causal equations rests on the assumption that the Lorentz force and two-species coupling do not populate higher moments sufficiently to alter transport coefficients or causality structure. No verification is indicated (e.g., moment convergence tests or direct numerical solution of the underlying kinetic equation for the Bjorken or homogeneous setups used in the applications).

    Authors: The 14-moment truncation is the standard closure employed in derivations of causal second-order hydrodynamics from the Boltzmann equation (following the original Israel-Stewart approach and subsequent literature). The Lorentz force and two-species coupling enter the moment hierarchy at the level of the first-order equations; the truncation assumes that higher moments relax on short timescales, preserving the causal structure of the resulting relaxation-type equations by construction. The applications to homogeneous and Bjorken flows illustrate the new oscillatory modes induced by the magnetic field within this framework. We acknowledge that explicit convergence tests against the full Boltzmann-Vlasov equation or higher-moment truncations are not performed. revision: no

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Explicit moment convergence tests or direct numerical solutions of the Boltzmann-Vlasov equation for the homogeneous and Bjorken setups, as these numerical validations were not carried out in the thesis.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation proceeds from Boltzmann-Vlasov via standard 14-moment closure

full rationale

The thesis begins from the relativistic Boltzmann-Vlasov equation, applies the method of moments under the 14-moment approximation, and obtains second-order hydrodynamic equations including electromagnetic couplings. This follows the established Israel-Stewart-style truncation procedure without any step that defines a quantity in terms of itself, renames a fitted parameter as a prediction, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation whose validity reduces to the present work. The 14-moment ansatz is introduced as a standard closure, not derived from the target equations. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or ansatz-smuggling patterns appear in the described chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard assumptions of relativistic kinetic theory and the validity of the 14-moment truncation; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The 14-moment approximation is sufficient to close the moment hierarchy for dissipative effects in the presence of electromagnetic fields.
    Invoked when moving from Boltzmann-Vlasov to hydrodynamic equations for both non-resistive and resistive cases.
  • domain assumption The plasma can be treated as a two-component system of oppositely charged particles.
    Stated when introducing coupling between species via magnetic and electric fields.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5803 in / 1398 out tokens · 30996 ms · 2026-07-01T03:11:12.575053+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005

    Kohsuke Yagi, Tetsuo Hatsuda, and Yasuo Miake.Quark-Gluon Plasma: From Big Bang to Little Bang. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005

  2. [2]

    Wiley-VCH, 2nd edition,

    David Griffiths.Introduction to Elementary Particles. Wiley-VCH, 2nd edition,

  3. [3]

    ISBN 978-3-527-40601-2

  4. [4]

    Perkins.Introduction to High Energy Physics

    Donald H. Perkins.Introduction to High Energy Physics. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 4th edition, 2000. ISBN 978-0-521-62196-0. doi: 10.1017/ CBO9780511809040

  5. [5]

    Brown, Max Dresden, and Lillian Hoddeson, editors.Pions to Quarks: Particle Physics in the 1950s

    Laurie M. Brown, Max Dresden, and Lillian Hoddeson, editors.Pions to Quarks: Particle Physics in the 1950s. Cambridge University Press, 1989. ISBN 978-0-521- 30984-7. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511563942

  6. [6]

    Breidenbach, J

    M. Breidenbach, J. I. Friedman, H. W. Kendall, E. D. Bloom, D. H. Coward, H. DeStaebler, J. Drees, L. W. Mo, and R. E. Taylor. Observed behavior of highly inelastic electron-proton scattering.Phys. Rev. Lett., 23:935–939, 1969. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.935

  7. [7]

    A schematic model of baryons and mesons.Phys

    Murray Gell-Mann. A schematic model of baryons and mesons.Phys. Lett., 8: 214–215, 1964. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3

  8. [8]

    G. Zweig. Ansu 3 model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. version

  9. [9]

    Technical Report CERN-TH-412, CERN, 1964

  10. [10]

    Advantages of the color octet gluon picture.Phys

    Harald Fritzsch, Murray Gell-Mann, and Heinrich Leutwyler. Advantages of the color octet gluon picture.Phys. Lett. B, 47:365–368, 1973. doi: 10.1016/ 0370-2693(73)90625-4

  11. [11]

    Nonabelian gauge theories of the strong interactions.Phys

    Steven Weinberg. Nonabelian gauge theories of the strong interactions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 31:494–497, 1973. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.31.494

  12. [12]

    Dirk H. Rischke. The quark gluon plasma in equilibrium.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 52:197–296, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2003.09.002. Bibliography163

  13. [13]

    Gross and Frank Wilczek

    David J. Gross and Frank Wilczek. Ultraviolet behavior of non-Abelian gauge theories.Phys. Rev. Lett., 30:1343–1346, 1973. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1343

  14. [14]

    David Politzer

    H. David Politzer. Reliable perturbative results for strong interactions?Phys. Rev. Lett., 30:1346–1349, 1973. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1346

  15. [15]

    Is there still anyt c mystery in lattice QCD? results with physical masses in the continuum limit III.JHEP, 09:073, 2010

    Szabolcs Borsanyi et al. Is there still anyt c mystery in lattice QCD? results with physical masses in the continuum limit III.JHEP, 09:073, 2010. doi: 10.1007/ JHEP09(2010)073

  16. [16]

    Edward V. Shuryak. Quantum chromodynamics and the theory of superdense mat- ter.Phys. Rept., 61:71–158, 1980. doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(80)90105-2

  17. [17]

    Emergence of Compositional Representations in Restricted Boltzmann Machines

    John C. Collins and Malcolm J. Perry. Superdense matter: Neutrons or asymptoti- cally free quarks?Phys. Rev. Lett., 34:1353–1356, 1975. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 34.1353

  18. [18]

    Evidence for quark-matter cores in massive neutron stars.Nature Phys., 16:907–910,

    Eemeli Annala, Tyler Gorda, Aleksi Kurkela, Joonas N¨ attil¨ a, and Aleksi Vuorinen. Evidence for quark-matter cores in massive neutron stars.Nature Phys., 16:907–910,

  19. [19]

    doi: 10.1038/s41567-020-0914-9

  20. [20]

    Aamodt et al

    K. Aamodt et al. Elliptic flow of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at √sN N = 2.76 TeV.Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:252302, 2010. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105. 252302

  21. [21]

    Arsene et al

    I. Arsene et al. Quark gluon plasma and color glass condensate at RHIC? the perspective from the BRAHMS experiment.Nucl. Phys. A, 757:1–27, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.130

  22. [22]

    Adcox et al

    K. Adcox et al. Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus–nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental evaluation by the PHENIX collaboration.Nucl. Phys. A, 757:184–283, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.086

  23. [23]

    B. B. Back et al. The PHOBOS perspective on discoveries at RHIC.Nucl. Phys. A, 757:28–101, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.084

  24. [24]

    Adams et al

    J. Adams et al. Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search for the quark gluon plasma: The STAR collaboration’s critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions.Nucl. Phys. A, 757:102–183, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005. 03.085

  25. [25]

    Voloshin and Y

    S. Voloshin and Y. Zhang. Flow study in relativistic nuclear collisions by Fourier expansion of azimuthal particle distributions.Z. Phys. C, 70:665–671, 1996. doi: 10.1007/s002880050141. Bibliography164

  26. [26]

    A. M. Poskanzer and S. A. Voloshin. Methods for analyzing anisotropic flow in relativistic nuclear collisions.Phys. Rev. C, 58:1671–1678, 1998. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevC.58.1671

  27. [27]

    Anisotropy as a signature of transverse collective flow.Phys

    Jean-Yves Ollitrault. Anisotropy as a signature of transverse collective flow.Phys. Rev. D, 46:229–245, 1992. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.46.229

  28. [28]

    Kolb and Ulrich W

    Peter F. Kolb and Ulrich W. Heinz. Quark gluon plasma and color glass condensate at RHIC? the perspective from hydrodynamics. 2003. In:Quark Gluon Plasma 3, eds. R. C. Hwa and X. N. Wang, World Scientific (2004)

  29. [29]

    The largenlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity.Adv

    Juan Martin Maldacena. The largenlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity.Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2:231–252, 1998. doi: 10.4310/ATMP.1998. v2.n2.a1

  30. [30]

    P. K. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets. Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics.Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:111601, 2005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.111601

  31. [31]

    Viscosity information from relativistic nuclear collisions: How perfect is the fluid observed at RHIC?Phys

    Paul Romatschke and Ulrike Romatschke. Viscosity information from relativistic nuclear collisions: How perfect is the fluid observed at RHIC?Phys. Rev. Lett., 99: 172301, 2007. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.172301

  32. [32]

    Conformal relativistic viscous hydrodynam- ics: Applications to RHIC results at √sN N = 200 GeV.Phys

    Matthew Luzum and Paul Romatschke. Conformal relativistic viscous hydrodynam- ics: Applications to RHIC results at √sN N = 200 GeV.Phys. Rev. C, 78:034915,

  33. [33]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.034915

  34. [34]

    The thermodynamics of irreversible processes

    Carl Eckart. The thermodynamics of irreversible processes. III. relativistic theory of the simple fluid.Phys. Rev., 58:919–924, 1940. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.58.919

  35. [35]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz.Fluid Mechanics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1959

  36. [36]

    Hiscock and Lee Lindblom

    William A. Hiscock and Lee Lindblom. Stability and causality in dissipative rela- tivistic fluids.Ann. Phys., 151:466–496, 1983. doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(83)90288-9

  37. [38]

    Zum paradoxon der w¨ armeleitungstheorie.Z

    Ingo M¨ uller. Zum paradoxon der w¨ armeleitungstheorie.Z. Phys., 198:329–344,

  38. [39]

    doi: 10.1007/BF01326412

  39. [40]

    Nonstationary irreversible thermodynamics: A causal relativistic theory.Ann

    Werner Israel. Nonstationary irreversible thermodynamics: A causal relativistic theory.Ann. Phys., 100:310–331, 1976. doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(76)90064-6. Bibliography165

  40. [41]

    Werner Israel and J. M. Stewart. Transient relativistic thermodynamics and kinetic theory.Ann. Phys., 118:341–372, 1979. doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(79)90130-1

  41. [42]

    Sulla conduzione del calore.Atti Semin

    Carlo Cattaneo. Sulla conduzione del calore.Atti Semin. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena, 3:83–101, 1948

  42. [43]

    On the kinetic theory of rarefied gases.Commun

    Harold Grad. On the kinetic theory of rarefied gases.Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 2:331–407, 1949. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160020403

  43. [44]

    Causal theories of dissipative relativistic fluid dynamics for nuclear collisions.Phys

    Azwinndini Muronga. Causal theories of dissipative relativistic fluid dynamics for nuclear collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 88:062302, 2002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88. 062302

  44. [45]

    Huichao Song and Ulrich W. Heinz. Causal viscous hydrodynamics in 2 + 1 di- mensions for relativistic heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. C, 77:064901, 2008. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.064901

  45. [46]

    (3+1)dhydrodynamic simulation of relativistic heavy-ion collisions.Phys

    Bj¨ orn Schenke, Sangyong Jeon, and Charles Gale. (3+1)dhydrodynamic simulation of relativistic heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. C, 82:014903, 2010. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevC.82.014903

  46. [47]

    Elliptic and triangular flow in event-by-eventd= 3+1 viscous hydrodynamics.Phys

    Bj¨ orn Schenke, Sangyong Jeon, and Charles Gale. Elliptic and triangular flow in event-by-eventd= 3+1 viscous hydrodynamics.Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:042301, 2011. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.042301

  47. [48]

    G. S. Denicol, H. Niemi, E. Molnar, and D. H. Rischke. Derivation of transient relativistic fluid dynamics from the Boltzmann equation.Phys. Rev. D, 85:114047,

  48. [49]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.114047

  49. [50]

    G. S. Denicol, E. Molnar, H. Niemi, and D. H. Rischke. Derivation of fluid dynamics from kinetic theory with the 14-moment approximation.Eur. Phys. J. A, 48:170,

  50. [51]

    doi: 10.1140/epja/i2012-12170-x

  51. [52]

    Skokov, A

    V. Skokov, A. Yu. Illarionov, and V. Toneev. Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 24:5925–5932, 2009. doi: 10.1142/ S0217751X09047570

  52. [53]

    Voronyuk, V

    V. Voronyuk, V. D. Toneev, W. Cassing, E. L. Bratkovskaya, V. P. Konchakovski, and S. A. Voloshin. (electro-)magnetic field evolution in relativistic heavy-ion col- lisions.Phys. Rev. C, 83:054911, 2011. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.054911

  53. [54]

    Event-by-event fluctuations of magnetic and electric fields in heavy ion collisions.Phys

    Adam Bzdak and Vladimir Seryak. Event-by-event fluctuations of magnetic and electric fields in heavy ion collisions.Phys. Lett. B, 703:431–434, 2011. doi: 10. 1016/j.physletb.2011.08.039. Bibliography166

  54. [55]

    Event-by-event generation of electro- magnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions.Phys

    Wei-Tian Deng and Xu-Guang Huang. Event-by-event generation of electro- magnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. C, 85:044907, 2012. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.044907

  55. [56]

    Duncan and Christopher Thompson

    Robert C. Duncan and Christopher Thompson. Formation of very strongly mag- netized neutron stars: Implications for gamma-ray bursts.Astrophys. J. Lett., 392: L9, 1992. doi: 10.1086/186413

  56. [57]

    D. E. Kharzeev, E. M. Levin, and M. Nardi. The effects of color charge fluctuations in high energy nuclear collisions.Nucl. Phys. A, 803:227–253, 2008. doi: 10.1016/ j.nuclphysa.2008.01.027

  57. [58]

    Kharzeev, and Harmen J

    Kenji Fukushima, Dmitri E. Kharzeev, and Harmen J. Warringa. The chiral mag- netic effect.Phys. Rev. D, 78:074033, 2008. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.074033

  58. [59]

    isprsjprs.2019.11.023,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.11

    Jie Zhao and Fuqiang Wang. Experimental searches for the chiral magnetic effect in heavy-ion collisions.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 107:200–236, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j. ppnp.2019.05.001

  59. [60]

    Miransky and Igor A

    Vladimir A. Miransky and Igor A. Shovkovy. Quantum field theory in a magnetic field: From quantum chromodynamics to graphene and Dirac semimetals.Phys. Rept., 576:1–209, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2015.02.003

  60. [61]

    Son and Piotr Surowka

    Dam T. Son and Piotr Surowka. Hydrodynamics with triangle anomalies.Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:191601, 2009. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.191601

  61. [62]

    Adam et al

    J. Adam et al. Globalλhyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: Evidence for the most vortical fluid.Nature, 548:62–65, 2017. doi: 10.1038/nature23004

  62. [63]

    Xu-Guang Huang, Armen Sedrakian, and Dirk H. Rischke. Kubo formulae for relativistic fluids in strong magnetic fields.Ann. Phys., 326:3075–3094, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2011.08.001

  63. [64]

    E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii.Physical Kinetics, volume 10 ofCourse of Theoretical Physics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1981

  64. [65]

    Andr´ e Lichnerowicz.Relativistic Hydrodynamics and Magnetohydrodynamics. W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1967

  65. [66]

    Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, 1989

    Angelo Marcello Anile.Relativistic Fluids and Magneto-Fluids. Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, 1989. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511564130

  66. [67]

    Magnetohydrodynamics, charged currents and directed flow in heavy ion collisions.Phys

    Umut Gursoy, Dmitri Kharzeev, and Krishna Rajagopal. Magnetohydrodynamics, charged currents and directed flow in heavy ion collisions.Phys. Rev. C, 89(5): 054905, 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.054905. Bibliography167

  67. [68]

    M. I. Abdulhamid et al. Observation of the electromagnetic field effect via charge- dependent directed flow in heavy-ion collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Col- lider.Phys. Rev. X, 14(1):011028, 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011028

  68. [70]

    Khwahish Kushwah and Gabriel S. Denicol. Relativistic dissipative magnetohydro- dynamics from the Boltzmann equation for a two-component gas.Phys. Rev. D, 109(9):096021, 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.096021

  69. [71]

    Relativistic dissipative magneto- hydrodynamics from the Boltzmann equation for 2-particle species gas.EPJ Web Conf., 296:03004, 2024

    Khwahish Kushwah and Gabriel Silveria Denicol. Relativistic dissipative magneto- hydrodynamics from the Boltzmann equation for 2-particle species gas.EPJ Web Conf., 296:03004, 2024. doi: 10.1051/epjconf/202429603004

  70. [72]

    Denicol, and Caio V

    Khwahish Kushwah, Gabriel S. Denicol, and Caio V. P. de Brito. Relativistic resistive magnetohydrodynamics for a two-component plasma.Phys. Rev. D, 113 (3):036021, 2026. doi: 10.1103/tl97-r2kh

  71. [74]

    Denicol and Dirk H

    Gabriel S. Denicol and Dirk H. Rischke.Microscopic Foundations of Relativistic Fluid Dynamics. 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-82077-0

  72. [75]

    Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, 2013

    Luciano Rezzolla and Olindo Zanotti.Relativistic Hydrodynamics. Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, 2013. ISBN 978-0-19-852890-6. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/ 9780198528906.001.0001

  73. [76]

    Rocha, David Wagner, Gabriel S

    Gabriel S. Rocha, David Wagner, Gabriel S. Denicol, Jorge Noronha, and Dirk H. Rischke. Theories of relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics, 2023

  74. [77]

    Callen.Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics

    Herbert B. Callen.Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics. Wi- ley, New York, 2nd edition, 1985

  75. [78]

    Cercignani and G

    C. Cercignani and G. M. Kremer.The Relativistic Boltzmann Equation: Theory and Applications. Birkhauser, 2002

  76. [79]

    Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.Ann

    Ulrich Heinz and Raimond Snellings. Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 63:123–151, 2013. doi: 10.1146/ annurev-nucl-102212-170540. Bibliography168

  77. [80]

    Hydrodynamic modeling of heavy-ion collisions.Int

    Charles Gale, Sangyong Jeon, and Bj¨ orn Schenke. Hydrodynamic modeling of heavy-ion collisions.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 28(11):1340011, 2013. doi: 10.1142/ S0217751X13400113

  78. [81]

    Recent development of hydrodynamic modeling in heavy-ion collisions, 2020

    Chun Shen and Li Yan. Recent development of hydrodynamic modeling in heavy-ion collisions, 2020

  79. [82]

    ´Etude relativiste de fluides visqueux et charg´ es.Ann

    Guy Pichon. ´Etude relativiste de fluides visqueux et charg´ es.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Phys. Theor., 2(1):21–85, 1965. URLhttp://www.numdam.org/item/ AIHPA_1965__2_1_21_0/

  80. [83]

    John Wiley & Sons, New York, 3rd edition, 1999

    John David Jackson.Classical Electrodynamics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 3rd edition, 1999

Showing first 80 references.