Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 55 references

In phantom DBI gravity the regular black-hole photon sphere stays exactly at the Schwarzschild coordinate radius, so eikonal modes, shadows, grey-body factors and strong lensing all reduce to one function of core size.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-07-01 03:55 UTC pith:K4HELUH5

load-bearing objection The paper's main point is that this phantom DBI regular metric keeps the photon sphere fixed at r=3M with exact Schwarzschild orbital frequency and Lyapunov exponent, collapsing eikonal QNMs, shadows, GBFs, and strong lensing to one core-size function. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.31710 v1 pith:K4HELUH5 submitted 2026-06-30 gr-qc

Eikonal Ringing, Shadows, Lensing, Grey-Body Factors, and Binding Energy of Asymptotically Flat Regular Black Holes in Phantom Dirac-Born-Infeld Gravity

classification gr-qc
keywords regular black holesphantom DBI gravityeikonal quasinormal modesblack hole shadowsstrong lensinggrey-body factorsgeodesic optics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a geodesic-optics analysis for the asymptotically flat regular black-hole metric that arises in phantom Dirac-Born-Infeld gravity. It establishes that the unstable null circular orbit remains fixed at the Schwarzschild-like coordinate radius for the entire black-hole branch, while the orbital frequency and Lyapunov exponent match the Schwarzschild values exactly. This identity collapses the eikonal quasinormal modes, the shadow radius, the grey-body factors and the strong-deflection observables to a single dimensionless function of the core-size parameter. Exact expressions are also derived for the specific energy and angular momentum of massive circular orbits together with an implicit ISCO condition whose binding efficiency falls as the regular core enlarges.

Core claim

The null-orbit structure admits an especially compact analytic treatment. The unstable photon orbit remains at the Schwarzschild-like coordinate radius throughout the black-hole branch, while the orbital frequency and Lyapunov exponent coincide exactly. Consequently, eikonal quasinormal modes (QNMs), shadow radius, GBFs, and strong-deflection observables are all governed by a single dimensionless function of the core-size parameter.

What carries the argument

The fixed unstable photon orbit at the Schwarzschild coordinate radius, which forces the orbital frequency and Lyapunov exponent to match the Schwarzschild case and thereby reduces every eikonal observable to a single function of the core-size parameter.

Load-bearing premise

The specific asymptotically flat regular metric obtained in phantom DBI gravity keeps the photon sphere radius exactly at the Schwarzschild value independent of the core-size parameter.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of the effective potential for null geodesics in the given metric that shows the location of the unstable circular orbit shifting away from the Schwarzschild coordinate radius.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Eikonal quasinormal mode frequencies and damping times are completely determined by the single core-size function.
  • The shadow radius equals the Schwarzschild expression evaluated at the same function.
  • Grey-body factors for all spins follow the same reduced description.
  • Strong-deflection lensing observables are likewise controlled by that one function.
  • The binding energy at the innermost stable circular orbit decreases monotonically as the regular core grows.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same fixed-orbit simplification may appear in other regular black-hole families that preserve the same null-geodesic symmetry.
  • High-resolution shadow measurements could directly bound the core-size parameter without needing the full quasinormal-mode spectrum.
  • The construction supplies an exact one-parameter family that can be used to test whether observed deviations from Schwarzschild geodesics are consistent with a regular core.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a geodesic-optics analysis for eikonal quasinormal modes, shadows, strong lensing, grey-body factors, and timelike binding energy of the asymptotically flat regular black-hole metric arising in phantom Dirac-Born-Infeld gravity. It asserts that the unstable photon orbit remains fixed at the Schwarzschild coordinate radius r=3M for the entire black-hole branch, with the orbital frequency Ω and Lyapunov exponent λ exactly matching their Schwarzschild values; consequently all listed observables are controlled by a single dimensionless function of the core-size parameter. Exact expressions are also given for the specific energy and angular momentum of timelike circular orbits, together with an implicit ISCO condition whose binding efficiency decreases with core size.

Significance. If the claimed metric identities hold, the construction supplies an exact analytic bridge between the regular core and its leading geodesic observables, which is a genuine strength for regular black-hole models. The exact (non-numerical) expressions for timelike energy, angular momentum, and the ISCO condition are particularly useful and should be retained.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (null geodesics and effective potential): the central simplification—that r_ph remains exactly 3M and that both Ω and λ coincide with Schwarzschild—requires explicit verification that the specific f(r) obtained from the phantom DBI action satisfies V'(3M)=0 and yields the same V''(3M) (where V=f/r²). The manuscript asserts the cancellation but does not display the algebraic steps or the explicit f(r) that would confirm the identity holds independently of the core-size parameter.
  2. [§4] §4 (eikonal QNMs, shadows, GBFs): because the one-function reduction rests on the two exact statements in §3, the subsequent formulae for the shadow radius, grey-body factors, and strong-deflection observables inherit the same unverified dependence; an explicit check against the DBI-derived f(r) is therefore load-bearing for the headline claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] The definition of the single dimensionless function of the core-size parameter should be stated once, with a clear equation number, in the introduction or §2 so that later sections can refer to it unambiguously.
  2. Figure captions for the grey-body profiles and binding-energy curves should explicitly note the range of the core-size parameter shown and whether the curves are analytic or numerical.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, the positive assessment of the analytic utility of the results, and the recommendation for major revision. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (null geodesics and effective potential): the central simplification—that r_ph remains exactly 3M and that both Ω and λ coincide with Schwarzschild—requires explicit verification that the specific f(r) obtained from the phantom DBI action satisfies V'(3M)=0 and yields the same V''(3M) (where V=f/r²). The manuscript asserts the cancellation but does not display the algebraic steps or the explicit f(r) that would confirm the identity holds independently of the core-size parameter.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit algebraic verification strengthens the presentation. Although the manuscript states that the identities follow directly from the DBI-derived f(r), the steps were not displayed. In the revised manuscript we will insert the explicit form of f(r) together with the direct evaluation of V'(3M) and V''(3M), confirming that both conditions hold independently of the core-size parameter. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (eikonal QNMs, shadows, GBFs): because the one-function reduction rests on the two exact statements in §3, the subsequent formulae for the shadow radius, grey-body factors, and strong-deflection observables inherit the same unverified dependence; an explicit check against the DBI-derived f(r) is therefore load-bearing for the headline claim.

    Authors: We concur that the derivations in §4 rest on the identities of §3. Adding the explicit verification requested above will place the subsequent formulae on a secure footing. The analytic expressions themselves remain unchanged; we will simply add a cross-reference to the new explicit check in §3. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Photon-sphere coincidence is a derived metric property; no load-bearing circularity

full rationale

The paper obtains a specific asymptotically flat regular metric from the phantom DBI action and then demonstrates that this metric satisfies V'(3M)=0 and yields Ω and λ identical to Schwarzschild at that radius. This exact cancellation is a non-generic feature of the solved f(r), allowing all listed observables to be expressed via one function of the core parameter. No self-definitional reduction, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain is exhibited; the parameter dependence is the ordinary consequence of a one-parameter family rather than a definitional loop. The derivation from action to metric to geodesic invariants remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central simplifications rest on the explicit form of the phantom DBI regular metric and the standard assumption of geodesic motion; the core-size parameter is the sole free parameter controlling all listed observables.

free parameters (1)
  • core-size parameter
    Dimensionless parameter that sets the scale of the regular core and enters every derived geodesic quantity.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Null and timelike geodesics govern light and massive particle motion in the given spacetime
    Standard GR assumption used to define the photon sphere, Lyapunov exponent, ISCO, and eikonal QNMs.
  • domain assumption The spacetime is the asymptotically flat regular black-hole solution of phantom DBI gravity
    The geometry is taken as given; all analytic coincidences follow from its explicit form.
invented entities (1)
  • Phantom DBI regular black hole no independent evidence
    purpose: Singularity-free black-hole solution with a smooth core
    Postulated within the modified gravity theory; no independent falsifiable evidence supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5778 in / 1547 out tokens · 58126 ms · 2026-07-01T03:55:59.060325+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop a geodesic-optics description of eikonal quasinormal ringing, blackhole shadows, strong lensing, grey-body factors (GBFs), and the binding energy of massive particles for the asymptotically flat regular black-hole geometry obtained in phantom Dirac-Born-Infeld (DBI) gravity. The null-orbit structure admits an especially compact analytic treatment. The unstable photon orbit remains at the Schwarzschild-like coordinate radius throughout the black-hole branch, while the orbital frequency and Lyapunov exponent coincide exactly. Consequently, eikonal quasinormal modes (QNMs), shadow radius, GBFs, and strong-deflection observables are all governed by a single dimensionless function of the core-size parameter. For timelike circular motion, we derive exact expressions for the specific energy and angular momentum, obtain the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) condition in closed implicit form, and show that the ISCO binding efficiency decreases as the regular core grows. We present illustrative plots for the exact geodesic invariants, the corresponding grey-body profiles, and the timelike binding-energy curves. The resulting construction provides an exact one-parameter bridge between the regular black-hole metric and its leading geodesic observables.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31710 by Diyorbek Rashidov, Gumisbek Allambergenov, Javlon Rayimbaev, Mardon Abdullaev, Pakhlavon Jamolov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Exact geodesic-optics observables for the asymptotically flat regular metric, compared with the leading small-core approximation. Top-left: MΩph = Mλph as a function of u = a/(3M). Top-right: normalized shadow radius Rsh/(3√ 3M). Bottom panels: corresponding relative errors of the O(u 2 ) truncation. 4. Eikonal Quasinormal Modes For test perturbations, the radial equation takes the Schrodinger-like form ¨ … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: illustrates both the binding-energy profiles along stable circular orbits and the monotonic decrease of the ISCO efficiency as the regular core grows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: displays the effective potentials for the same parameter choices used in the GBF analysis, namely u = a/(3M) = 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.4 and ℓ = 3, 4. The peak remains pinned at rph = 3M for all core sizes, while its height decreases monotonically with increasing u through the factor Ξ(u). This directly explains why the transmission threshold in Equation (48) moves to lower frequency as the regular core grows. By… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Exact eikonal GBFs for the asymptotically flat regular metric, computed from Equation (47) for moderate multipoles ℓ = 3, 4 and four representative core parameters u = a/(3M). Larger u shifts the transition to lower frequencies, while a larger ℓ steepens the profile. 8. Strong Lensing and The Stefanov Map For a general static spherical metric, the strong-deflection observables can be expressed in terms of … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singularities.Phys

    Penrose, R. Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singularities.Phys. Rev. Lett.1965,14, 57–59

  2. [2]

    The Singularities of Gravitational Collapse and Cosmology.Proc

    Hawking, S.W.; Penrose, R. The Singularities of Gravitational Collapse and Cosmology.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A1970, 314, 529–548

  3. [3]

    Non-singular general-relativistic gravitational collapse

    Bardeen, J.M. Non-singular general-relativistic gravitational collapse. In Proceedings of the International Conference GR5, Tbilisi, Georgia, USSR, 9–16 September 1968; p. 174

  4. [4]

    Vacuum nonsingular black hole.Gen

    Dymnikova, I. Vacuum nonsingular black hole.Gen. Relativ. Gravit.1992,24, 235–242

  5. [5]

    Formation and evaporation of non-singular black holes.Phys

    Hayward, S.A. Formation and evaporation of non-singular black holes.Phys. Rev. Lett.2006,96, 031103

  6. [6]

    Black Holes in Asymptotic Safety: A Review of Solutions and Phenomenology.Int

    Spina, A. Black Holes in Asymptotic Safety: A Review of Solutions and Phenomenology.Int. J. Grav. Theor . Phys.2025, 1, 8

  7. [7]

    Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics.Phys

    Ayon-Beato, E.; Garcia, A. Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics.Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998,80, 5056–5059

  8. [8]

    Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics.Phys

    Bronnikov, K.A. Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics.Phys. Rev. D2001, 63, 044005

  9. [9]

    Dark matter halo as a source of regular black-hole geometries.Phys

    Konoplya, R.A.; Zhidenko, A. Dark matter halo as a source of regular black-hole geometries.Phys. Rev. D2026, 113, 043011

  10. [10]

    Noncommutative geometry inspired Schwarzschild black hole.Phys

    Nicolini, P.; Smailagic, A.; Spallucci, E. Noncommutative geometry inspired Schwarzschild black hole.Phys. Lett. B2006, 632, 547–551

  11. [12]

    Measurement of the Kerr spin parameter by observation of a compact object’s shadow.Phys

    Hioki, K.; Maeda, K.I. Measurement of the Kerr spin parameter by observation of a compact object’s shadow.Phys. Rev. D 2009,80, 024042

  12. [13]

    Calculating black hole shadows: review of analytical studies.Phys

    Perlick, V .; Tsupko, O.Y . Calculating black hole shadows: review of analytical studies.Phys. Rep.2022,947, 1–39

  13. [14]

    Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit.Phys

    Bozza, V . Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit.Phys. Rev. D2002,66, 103001

  14. [15]

    Connection between black-hole quasinormal modes and lensing in the strong deflection limit.Phys

    Stefanov, I.Z.; Yazadjiev, S.S.; Gyulchev, G.G. Connection between black-hole quasinormal modes and lensing in the strong deflection limit.Phys. Rev. Lett.2010,104, 251103

  15. [16]

    Correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal modes.JCAP2024,2024, 068

    Konoplya, R.A.; Zhidenko, A. Correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal modes.JCAP2024,2024, 068

  16. [17]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments.Ann

    Carr, B.; K ¨uhnel, F. Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments.Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.2020, 70, 355–394

  17. [18]

    Exact, nonsingular black holes from a phantom DBI field as primordial dark matter.Phys

    Parvez, T.; Shankaranarayanan, S. Exact, nonsingular black holes from a phantom DBI field as primordial dark matter.Phys. Rev. D2026,113, L101503

  18. [19]

    Foundations of the New Field Theory.Proc

    Born, M.; Infeld, L. Foundations of the New Field Theory.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A1934,144, 425–451

  19. [20]

    An extensible model of the electron.Proc

    Dirac, P.A.M. An extensible model of the electron.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A1962,268, 57–67

  20. [21]

    k-Inflation.Phys

    Armendariz-Picon, C.; Damour, T.; Mukhanov, V .F. k-Inflation.Phys. Lett. B1999,458, 209–218

  21. [22]

    Hamilton-Jacobi and Schr ¨odinger Separable Solutions of Einstein’s Equations.Commun

    Carter, B. Hamilton-Jacobi and Schr ¨odinger Separable Solutions of Einstein’s Equations.Commun. Math. Phys.1968, 10, 280–310

  22. [23]

    Global Structure of the Kerr Family of Gravitational Fields.Phys

    Carter, B. Global Structure of the Kerr Family of Gravitational Fields.Phys. Rev.1968,174, 1559–1571

  23. [24]

    Axisymmetric black holes allowing for separation of variables in the Klein- Gordon and Hamilton-Jacobi equations.Phys

    Konoplya, R.A.; Stuchl´ık, Z.; Zhidenko, A. Axisymmetric black holes allowing for separation of variables in the Klein- Gordon and Hamilton-Jacobi equations.Phys. Rev. D2018,97, 084044

  24. [25]

    Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes.Living Rev

    Kokkotas, K.D.; Schmidt, B.G. Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes.Living Rev. Relativ.1999,2, 2

  25. [26]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory.Rev

    Konoplya, R.A.; Zhidenko, A. Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory.Rev. Mod. Phys. 2011,83, 793–836

  26. [27]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes.Class

    Berti, E.; Cardoso, V .; Starinets, A.O. Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes.Class. Quantum Grav.2009, 26, 163001

  27. [28]

    Review of analytic results on quasinormal modes of black holes.Grav

    Bolokhov, S.V .; Skvortsova, M. Review of analytic results on quasinormal modes of black holes.Grav. Cosmol.2025, 31, 423–446

  28. [29]

    Quasinormal spectra of higher dimensional regular black holes in theories with infinite curvature corrections

    Arbelaez, J.P. Quasinormal spectra of higher dimensional regular black holes in theories with infinite curvature corrections. arXiv2025,preprint, arXiv:2509.25141

  29. [30]

    Analytic expressions for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors in the eikonal limit and beyond.Class

    Konoplya, R.A.; Zhidenko, A. Analytic expressions for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors in the eikonal limit and beyond.Class. Quantum Grav.2023,40, 245005

  30. [31]

    Long-lived quasinormal modes and overtones’ behavior of holonomy-corrected black holes.Phys

    Bolokhov, S.V . Long-lived quasinormal modes and overtones’ behavior of holonomy-corrected black holes.Phys. Rev. D 2024,110, 024010

  31. [32]

    Analytic Expressions for Quasinormal Modes of a Regular Black Hole Sourced by a Dehnen-Type Halo.Int

    Malik, Z. Analytic Expressions for Quasinormal Modes of a Regular Black Hole Sourced by a Dehnen-Type Halo.Int. J. Grav. Theor . Phys.2026,2, 3

  32. [33]

    Analytical QNMs of fields of various spin in the Hayward spacetime.EPL2024,147, 69001

    Malik, Z. Analytical QNMs of fields of various spin in the Hayward spacetime.EPL2024,147, 69001

  33. [34]

    Quasinormal modes of the Mannheim-Kazanas black holes.Z

    Malik, Z. Quasinormal modes of the Mannheim-Kazanas black holes.Z. Naturforsch. A2024,79, 1063–1073

  34. [35]

    Quasinormal Modes of Dilaton Black Holes: Analytic Approximations.Int

    Malik, Z. Quasinormal Modes of Dilaton Black Holes: Analytic Approximations.Int. J. Theor . Phys.2024,63, 128

  35. [36]

    Analytic quasinormal frequencies of the Casadio-Fabbri-Mazzacurati black hole.Can

    Malik, Z. Analytic quasinormal frequencies of the Casadio-Fabbri-Mazzacurati black hole.Can. J. Phys.2025,103, 800–811

  36. [37]

    Analytic expressions for quasinormal modes of the general parametrized spherically symmetric black holes and the Hod’s proposal.Phys

    Dubinsky, A. Analytic expressions for quasinormal modes of the general parametrized spherically symmetric black holes and the Hod’s proposal.Phys. Lett. B2025,861, 139251

  37. [38]

    Analytic expressions for grey-body factors of the general parametrized spherically symmetric black holes.EPL2025,149, 69004

    Dubinsky, A.; Zinhailo, A.F. Analytic expressions for grey-body factors of the general parametrized spherically symmetric black holes.EPL2025,149, 69004

  38. [39]

    Black Holes Immersed in Galactic Dark Matter Halo.Int

    Dubinsky, A. Black Holes Immersed in Galactic Dark Matter Halo.Int. J. Grav. Theor . Phys.2025,1, 2

  39. [40]

    Further clarification on quasinormal modes/circular null geodesics correspondence.Phys

    Konoplya, R.A. Further clarification on quasinormal modes/circular null geodesics correspondence.Phys. Lett. B2023, 838, 137674

  40. [41]

    Black holes in Starobinsky-Bel-Robinson gravity and the breakdown of quasinormal modes/null geodesics correspondence.Phys

    Bolokhov, S.V . Black holes in Starobinsky-Bel-Robinson gravity and the breakdown of quasinormal modes/null geodesics correspondence.Phys. Lett. B2024,856, 138879

  41. [42]

    Eikonal instability of Gauss-Bonnet—(anti-)—de Sitter black holes.Phys

    Konoplya, R.A.; Zhidenko, A. Eikonal instability of Gauss-Bonnet—(anti-)—de Sitter black holes.Phys. Rev. D2017, 95, 104005

  42. [43]

    The portrait of eikonal instability in Lovelock theories.JCAP2017,05, 050

    Konoplya, R.A.; Zhidenko, A. The portrait of eikonal instability in Lovelock theories.JCAP2017,05, 050

  43. [44]

    The Escape of Photons from Gravitationally Intense Stars.Mon

    Synge, J.L. The Escape of Photons from Gravitationally Intense Stars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.1966,131, 463–466

  44. [46]

    Optical properties of black hole in the presence of plasma: Shadow.Phys

    Atamurotov, F.; Ahmedov, B. Optical properties of black hole in the presence of plasma: Shadow.Phys. Rev. D2015, 92, 084005

  45. [47]

    Horizon structure of rotating Einstein-Born-Infeld black holes and shadow.Eur

    Atamurotov, F.; Ghosh, S.G.; Ahmedov, B. Horizon structure of rotating Einstein-Born-Infeld black holes and shadow.Eur . Phys. J. C2016,76, 273

  46. [48]

    Exploring black hole shadows in axisymmetric spacetimes with coordinate-independent methods and neural networks.Eur

    Mirzaev, T.; Ahmedov, B.; Bambi, C. Exploring black hole shadows in axisymmetric spacetimes with coordinate-independent methods and neural networks.Eur . Phys. J. C2025,85, 1194

  47. [49]

    Shadows of parametrized axially symmetric black holes allowing for separation of variables

    Konoplya, R.A.; Zhidenko, A. Shadows of parametrized axially symmetric black holes allowing for separation of variables. Phys. Rev. D2021,103, 104033

  48. [50]

    Concerns regarding the use of black hole shadows as standard rulers.Class

    Vagnozzi, S.; Bambi, C.; Visinelli, L. Concerns regarding the use of black hole shadows as standard rulers.Class. Quantum Grav.2020,37, 087001

  49. [51]

    Black Hole Shadows, Photon Rings, and Lensing Rings.Phys

    Gralla, S.E.; Holz, D.E.; Wald, R.M. Black Hole Shadows, Photon Rings, and Lensing Rings.Phys. Rev. D2019, 100, 024018

  50. [52]

    Photon Regions and Shadows of Kerr-Newman-NUT Black Holes with a Cosmological Constant.Phys

    Grenzebach, A.; Perlick, V .; L¨ammerzahl, C. Photon Regions and Shadows of Kerr-Newman-NUT Black Holes with a Cosmological Constant.Phys. Rev. D2014,89, 124004

  51. [53]

    Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically symmetric black hole.Phys

    Perlick, V .; Tsupko, O.Y .; Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G.S. Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically symmetric black hole.Phys. Rev. D2015,92, 104031

  52. [54]

    A First-Order Eikonal Framework for Quasinormal Modes, Shadows, Strong Lensing, and Grey-Body Factors in a Scalarized Black-Hole Metric.Annals Phys.2026,491, 170514

    L¨utf¨uo˘glu, B.C.; Rayimbaev, J.; Murodov, S.; et al. A First-Order Eikonal Framework for Quasinormal Modes, Shadows, Strong Lensing, and Grey-Body Factors in a Scalarized Black-Hole Metric.Annals Phys.2026,491, 170514

  53. [55]

    Correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal frequencies for rotating black holes.Phys

    Konoplya, R.A.; Zhidenko, A. Correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal frequencies for rotating black holes.Phys. Lett. B2025,861, 139288

  54. [56]

    An Efficient Higher-Order WKB Code for Quasinormal Modes and Greybody Factors.Int

    Matyjasek, J.; Konoplya, R.A.; Zhidenko, A. An Efficient Higher-Order WKB Code for Quasinormal Modes and Greybody Factors.Int. J. Grav. Theor . Phys.2026,2, 5

  55. [57]

    Late time behavior of stellar collapse and explosions: 1

    Gundlach, C.; Price, R.H.; Pullin, J. Late time behavior of stellar collapse and explosions: 1. Linearized perturbations.Phys. Rev. D1994,49, 883–889. https://doi.org/10.53941/ijgtp.2026.200003 14 of 14