pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31841 · v1 · pith:D6IY6XJ5new · submitted 2026-06-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Universal Spectral Mirage Gaps in Superconductors with Time-Reversal-Symmetric Spin-Orbit Coupling

Xusheng Wang , Gaomin Tang , Shuai-Hua Ji This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords mirage gapsspin-orbit couplingsuperconductorstime-reversal symmetryRashba SOCZeeman splittingspectral featuresmagnetic field orientation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Any time-reversal-symmetric spin-orbit coupling generates mirage gaps in superconductors under perpendicular magnetic fields

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that superconductors with any time-reversal-symmetric spin-orbit coupling produce spectral mirage gaps near the spin-orbit energy scale whenever the magnetic field has a component perpendicular to the spin-orbit texture. The parallel component instead creates Zeeman-split features close to the superconducting gap. This extends earlier work on Ising spin-orbit coupling to a general case and is illustrated explicitly for Rashba and Rashba-Ising forms. A sympathetic reader would care because the orientation-dependent signatures turn superconducting spectroscopy into a direct probe of spin-orbit textures and their strengths in real materials.

Core claim

Superconductors with any time-reversal-symmetric SOC generate mirage gaps near the SOC energy scale when the applied magnetic field has a perpendicular component to the SOC texture, while the parallel component produces Zeeman-split spectral features near the superconducting gap. The principle is demonstrated in Rashba SOC and Rashba-Ising SOC.

What carries the argument

The directional texture of time-reversal-symmetric spin-orbit coupling, which sets whether a magnetic-field component is perpendicular or parallel and thereby selects between mirage-gap and Zeeman-split spectral responses.

If this is right

  • Mirage gaps become a general signature of finite-energy pairing correlations across all time-reversal-symmetric SOC types rather than only Ising SOC.
  • Spectroscopy distinguishes the orientation of the SOC texture relative to the crystal axes by rotating the applied field.
  • The same field-orientation rule applies to both pure Rashba and mixed Rashba-Ising SOC.
  • Parallel-field data yield Zeeman-split features near the gap that can be used to calibrate SOC strength independently.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Rotating the magnetic field in a single device could map the local SOC direction without changing samples.
  • The distinction between perpendicular and parallel responses may help separate SOC effects from other orbital or paramagnetic pair-breaking mechanisms.
  • The result suggests that any microscopic model preserving time-reversal symmetry in the SOC term will exhibit the same field-orientation rule.

Load-bearing premise

The spin-orbit coupling possesses a well-defined directional texture that lets perpendicular and parallel magnetic-field components be distinguished.

What would settle it

Tunneling spectroscopy or density-of-states measurements on a Rashba superconductor that show mirage gaps near the SOC energy only when the field is oriented perpendicular to the expected Rashba texture, and no such gaps when the field is parallel.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31841 by Gaomin Tang, Shuai-hua Ji, Xusheng Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic spin texture of a general TRS SOC at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Magnetic-field-dependent spectral features of a Rashba superconductor with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Magnetic-field-dependent spectral features of a superconductor with coexisting Rashba and Ising SOC with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Field-dependent overall anomalous Green’s function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spectral mirage gaps, regarded as evidence of finite-energy pairing correlations, have so far been mainly studied in superconductors with Ising spin-orbit coupling (SOC). Here, we show that superconductors with any time-reversal-symmetric SOC can generate mirage gaps near the SOC energy scale when the applied magnetic field has a component perpendicular to the SOC texture, whereas the parallel component produces Zeeman-split spectral features near the superconducting gap. We demonstrate this general principle in superconductors with Rashba and Rashba-Ising SOC. These universal field-dependent signatures establish superconducting spectroscopy as a powerful probe of SOC textures and strengths.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that superconductors with any time-reversal-symmetric spin-orbit coupling (SOC) exhibit spectral mirage gaps near the SOC energy scale when the applied magnetic field has a component perpendicular to the SOC texture, while the parallel component produces Zeeman-split features near the superconducting gap. This general principle is demonstrated explicitly in models with Rashba and Rashba-Ising SOC, positioning superconducting spectroscopy as a probe of SOC textures.

Significance. If the claimed universality holds, the result would extend mirage-gap phenomenology beyond Ising SOC and supply field-orientation-dependent spectroscopic signatures that could serve as falsifiable tests for SOC strength and texture in a broad class of materials. The absence of free parameters in the stated principle and the explicit demonstrations in two SOC classes are positive features.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The universality claim for 'any time-reversal-symmetric SOC' requires a consistent definition of the reference 'SOC texture' direction against which the magnetic-field components are classified as parallel or perpendicular. For general TRS SOC of the form α(k)·σ the direction is k-dependent (e.g., Rashba SOC has α(k) = α(ky, −kx, 0) that rotates with momentum). The manuscript demonstrates the effect only for Rashba and Rashba-Ising cases; no general construction, local averaging, or projection procedure is supplied that would preserve a global parallel/perp distinction for arbitrary textures. This directly affects the central claim of universality.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the universality claim.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The universality claim for 'any time-reversal-symmetric SOC' requires a consistent definition of the reference 'SOC texture' direction against which the magnetic-field components are classified as parallel or perpendicular. For general TRS SOC of the form α(k)·σ the direction is k-dependent (e.g., Rashba SOC has α(k) = α(ky, −kx, 0) that rotates with momentum). The manuscript demonstrates the effect only for Rashba and Rashba-Ising cases; no general construction, local averaging, or projection procedure is supplied that would preserve a global parallel/perp distinction for arbitrary textures. This directly affects the central claim of universality.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from an explicit definition of the SOC texture direction to support the universality statement. In the revised version we will add the following clarification: for a general TRS SOC term α(k)·σ the local texture direction at momentum k is the unit vector in the direction of α(k). Parallel and perpendicular components of the applied field B are defined locally with respect to this direction. The mirage-gap phenomenology then follows from the structure of the Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamiltonian at each k, with the perpendicular component generating avoided crossings near the SOC energy scale. This local construction is already implicit in the Rashba and Rashba-Ising calculations; we will make it explicit in a new paragraph in the introduction and update the abstract accordingly. A short general argument based on the anticommuting structure of the perpendicular Zeeman term with the SOC will also be included to justify why the result holds beyond the two explicit models. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper states a general principle for mirage gaps under TRS SOC and demonstrates it explicitly in Rashba and Rashba-Ising models. No equations or steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the distinction between perpendicular and parallel field components is introduced as an external physical criterion applied to the SOC texture, not derived from the result itself. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks with no reduction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5633 in / 1016 out tokens · 50839 ms · 2026-07-01T02:39:56.680542+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Fulde, High field superconductivity in thin films, Adv

    P. Fulde, High field superconductivity in thin films, Adv. Phys.22, 667 (1973)

    1973

  2. [2]

    A. M. Clogston, Upper limit for the critical field in hard superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.9, 266 (1962)

    1962

  3. [3]

    Chandrasekhar, A note on the maximum critical field of high-field superconductors, Appl

    B. Chandrasekhar, A note on the maximum critical field of high-field superconductors, Appl. Phys. Lett.1, 7 (1962)

    1962

  4. [4]

    Sarma, On the influence of a uniform exchange field acting on the spins of the conduction electrons in a su- perconductor, J

    G. Sarma, On the influence of a uniform exchange field acting on the spins of the conduction electrons in a su- perconductor, J. Phys. Chem. Solids.24, 1029 (1963)

    1963

  5. [5]

    Maki, Effect of Pauli paramagnetism on magnetic properties of high-field superconductors, Phys

    K. Maki, Effect of Pauli paramagnetism on magnetic properties of high-field superconductors, Phys. Rev.148, 362 (1966)

    1966

  6. [6]

    Meservey, P

    R. Meservey, P. Tedrow, and P. Fulde, Magnetic field splitting of the quasiparticle states in superconducting aluminum films, Phys. Rev. Lett25, 1270 (1970)

    1970

  7. [7]

    Meservey, P

    R. Meservey, P. Tedrow, and R. C. Bruno, Tunneling measurements on spin-paired superconductors with spin- orbit scattering, Phys. Rev. B11, 4224 (1975)

    1975

  8. [8]

    K. B. Gubbels and H. T. Stoof, Imbalanced fermi gases at unitarity, Phys. Rep.525, 255 (2013)

    2013

  9. [9]

    Meservey and P

    R. Meservey and P. Tedrow, Spin-polarized electron tun- neling, Phys. Rep.238, 173 (1994)

    1994

  10. [10]

    Amundsen, J

    M. Amundsen, J. Linder, J. W. Robinson, I. ˇZuti´ c, and N. Banerjee, Colloquium: Spin-orbit effects in supercon- ducting hybrid structures, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 021003 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    R. A. Klemm, A. Luther, and M. Beasley, Theory of the upper critical field in layered superconductors, Phys. Rev. B12, 877 (1975)

    1975

  12. [12]

    Tedrow and R

    P. Tedrow and R. Meservey, Critical magnetic field of very thin superconducting aluminum films, Phys. Rev. B 25, 171 (1982)

    1982

  13. [13]

    Alexander, T

    J. Alexander, T. Orlando, D. Rainer, and P. Tedrow, Theory of Fermi-liquid effects in high-field tunneling, Phys. Rev. B31, 5811 (1985)

    1985

  14. [14]

    A. G. Swartz, A. K. Cheung, H. Yoon, Z. Chen, Y. Hikita, S. Raghu, and H. Y. Hwang, Superconducting tunneling spectroscopy of spin-orbit coupling and orbital depairing in Nb: SrTiO 3, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 167003 (2018)

    2018

  15. [15]

    L. P. Gor’kov and E. I. Rashba, Superconducting 2d sys- tem with lifted spin degeneracy: mixed singlet-triplet state, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 037004 (2001)

    2001

  16. [16]

    Barzykin and L

    V. Barzykin and L. P. Gor’kov, Inhomogeneous stripe phase revisited for surface superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 227002 (2002)

    2002

  17. [17]

    Olde Olthof, J

    L. Olde Olthof, J. Weggemans, G. Kimbell, J. Robinson, and X. Montiel, Tunable critical field in Rashba super- conductor thin films, Phys. Rev. B103, L020504 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    Ili´ c, J

    S. Ili´ c, J. S. Meyer, and M. Houzet, Enhancement of the upper critical field in disordered transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 117001 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    M¨ ockli and M

    D. M¨ ockli and M. Khodas, Ising superconductors: In- terplay of magnetic field, triplet channels, and disorder, Phys. Rev. B101, 014510 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    Tewari, T

    S. Tewari, T. D. Stanescu, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Topologically non-trivial superconductivity in spin– orbit-coupled systems: bulk phases and quantum phase 6 transitions, New J. Phys.13, 065004 (2011)

    2011

  21. [21]

    B. T. Zhou, N. F. Yuan, H.-L. Jiang, and K. T. Law, Ising superconductivity and Majorana fermions in transition-metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev, B93, 180501 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    Schirmer, J

    J. Schirmer, J. Jain, and C.-X. Liu, Topological super- conductivity induced by spin-orbit coupling, perpendicu- lar magnetic field, and superlattice potential, Phys. Rev. B109, 134518 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    S. K. Ghosh, M. Smidman, T. Shang, J. F. Annett, A. D. Hillier, J. Quintanilla, and H. Yuan, Recent progress on superconductors with time-reversal symmetry breaking, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter33, 033001 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    Z. Y. Zhu, Y. C. Cheng, and U. Schwingenschl¨ ogl, Gi- ant spin-orbit-induced spin splitting in two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenide semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B84, 153402 (2011)

    2011

  25. [25]

    N. F. Yuan, B. T. Zhou, W.-Y. He, and K. Law, Ising superconductivity in transition metal dichalcogenides, arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.01847 (2016)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    Liu, Unconventional superconductivity in bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys

    C.-X. Liu, Unconventional superconductivity in bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 087001 (2017)

    2017

  27. [27]

    J. Lu, O. Zheliuk, I. Leermakers, N. F. Yuan, U. Zeitler, K. T. Law, and J. Ye, Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS2, Science350, 1353 (2015)

    2015

  28. [28]

    Saito, Y

    Y. Saito, Y. Nakamura, M. S. Bahramy, Y. Kohama, J. Ye, Y. Kasahara, Y. Nakagawa, M. Onga, M. Toku- naga, T. Nojima,et al., Superconductivity protected by spin–valley locking in ion-gated MoS2, Nat. Phys.12, 144 (2016)

    2016

  29. [29]

    X. Xi, Z. Wang, W. Zhao, J.-H. Park, K. T. Law, H. Berger, L. Forr´ o, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Ising pair- ing in superconducting NbSe 2 atomic layers, Nat. Phys. 12, 139 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    E. Sohn, X. Xi, W.-Y. He, S. Jiang, Z. Wang, K. Kang, J.-H. Park, H. Berger, L. Forr´ o, K. T. Law,et al., An unusual continuous paramagnetic-limited superconduct- ing phase transition in 2D NbSe 2, Nat. Mater.17, 504 (2018)

    2018

  31. [31]

    Yi, L.-H

    H. Yi, L.-H. Hu, Y. Wang, R. Xiao, J. Cai, D. R. Hickey, C. Dong, Y.-F. Zhao, L.-J. Zhou, R. Zhang,et al., Crossover from Ising- to Rashba-type superconductivity in epitaxial Bi 2Se3/monolayer NbSe 2 heterostructures, Nat. Mater.21, 1366 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    S. C. De la Barrera, M. R. Sinko, D. P. Gopalan, N. Sivadas, K. L. Seyler, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. W. Tsen, X. Xu, D. Xiao,et al., Tuning Ising super- conductivity with layer and spin–orbit coupling in two- dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Com- mun.9, 1427 (2018)

    2018

  33. [33]

    C.-w. Cho, J. Lyu, L. An, T. Han, K. T. Lo, C. Y. Ng, J. Hu, Y. Gao, G. Li, M. Huang,et al., Nodal and ne- matic superconducting phases in NbSe2 monolayers from competing superconducting channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 087002 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    W. Li, J. Huang, X. Li, S. Zhao, J. Lu, Z. V. Han, and H. Wang, Recent progresses in two-dimensional Ising su- perconductivity, Mater. Today Phys.21, 100504 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    P. Wan, O. Zheliuk, N. F. Yuan, X. Peng, L. Zhang, M. Liang, U. Zeitler, S. Wiedmann, N. E. Hussey, T. T. Palstra,et al., Orbital Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-ovchinnikov state in an Ising superconductor, Nature619, 46 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    J.-Y. Ji, Y. Hu, T. Bao, Y. Xu, M. Huang, J. Chen, Q.- K. Xue, and D. Zhang, Continuous tuning of spin-orbit coupled superconductivity in NbSe 2, Phys. Rev. B110, 104509 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Volavka, J

    D. Volavka, J. Kaˇ cmarˇ c´ ık, T. Moˇ sko, Z. Pribulov´ a, B. Stropkai, J. Bednarˇ c´ ık, Y. Gao, O. Moulding, M.-A. M´ easson, C. Marcenat,et al., Ising superconductivity in noncentrosymmetric bulk NbSe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 016002 (2026)

    2026

  38. [38]

    H. Liu, H. Liu, D. Zhang, and X. Xie, Microscopic theory of in-plane critical field in two-dimensional Ising super- conducting systems, Phys. Rev. B102, 174510 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    G. Tang, C. Bruder, and W. Belzig, Magnetic field- induced “mirage” gap in an Ising superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 237001 (2021)

    2021

  40. [40]

    Ili´ c, J

    S. Ili´ c, J. S. Meyer, and M. Houzet, Spectral properties of disordered Ising superconductors with singlet and triplet pairing in in-plane magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B108, 214510 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    Wang, D.-K

    Z. Wang, D.-K. Ki, H. Chen, H. Berger, A. H. MacDon- ald, and A. F. Morpurgo, Strong interface-induced spin- orbit interaction in graphene on WS 2, Nat. Commun.6, 8339 (2015)

    2015

  42. [42]

    Masseroni, M

    M. Masseroni, M. Gull, A. Panigrahi, N. Jacob- sen, F. Fischer, C. Tong, J. D. Gerber, M. Niese, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe,et al., Spin-orbit proximity in MoS 2/bilayer graphene heterostructures, Nat. Com- mun.15, 9251 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    P. A. Frigeri, D. F. Agterberg, A. Koga, and M. Sigrist, Superconductivity without inversion symmetry: MnSi versus CePt3Si, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 097001 (2004)

    2004

  44. [44]

    Harms, M

    J. Harms, M. Hein, and W. Belzig, Collapse of the superconducting order parameter in Ising superconduc- tors with Rashba spin-orbit coupling, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.01910 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Patil, G

    S. Patil, G. Tang, and W. Belzig, Spectral properties of a mixed singlet-triplet Ising superconductor, Front. Elec- tron. Mater.3, 1254302 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    X. Wang, G. Tang, and S.-h. Ji, First-order transitions in weak Ising spin-orbit-coupled superconductors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.03774 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    A. V. Balatsky, I. Vekhter, and J.-X. Zhu, Impurity- induced states in conventional and unconventional su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 373 (2006)

    2006

  48. [48]

    R. C. Dynes, V. Narayanamurti, and J. P. Garno, Di- rect measurement of quasiparticle-lifetime broadening in a strong-coupled superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.41, 1509 (1978)

    1978

  49. [49]

    See Supplemental Material for details on the coherence- peak positions of the mirage and superconducting gaps, the free-energy derivation and computational methods, self-consistent gap calculations for different SOC con- figurations, angle-dependent pairing correlations in the Rashba superconductor, and pairing correlations in the superconductor with coex...

  50. [50]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Cou- pled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS 2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 196802 (2012)

    2012

  51. [51]

    N. F. Yuan, K. F. Mak, and K. Law, Possible topological superconducting phases of MoS 2, Phys. Rev. Lett113, 097001 (2014)

    2014

  52. [52]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. D. Simons,Condensed matter field theory(Cambridge university press, 2010). 7

    2010

  53. [53]

    X. Wang, L. He, and S. Ji, Unified description for reen- trance and Tc enhancement in ferromagnetic supercon- ductors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.06889 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    X. Wang, L. He, and S.-h. Ji, Temperature-induced su- perconductivity enhancement under large exchange field, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19030 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Y.-M. Xie, B. T. Zhou, and K. T. Law, Spin-orbit- parity-coupled superconductivity in topological mono- layer WTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 107001 (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    Chakraborty and A

    D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Interplay of finite-energy and finite-momentum superconducting pair- ing, Phys. Rev. B106, 024511 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    Bahari, S.-B

    M. Bahari, S.-B. Zhang, and B. Trauzettel, Intrinsic finite-energy cooper pairing in j= 3/2 superconductors, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L012017 (2022)

    2022

  58. [58]

    R¨ ußmann, M

    P. R¨ ußmann, M. Bahari, S. Bl¨ ugel, and B. Trauzettel, Interorbital Cooper pairing at finite energies in Rashba surface states, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043181 (2023)

    2023

  59. [59]

    Kornich, Emergence of a condensate with finite-energy Cooper pairing in hybrid exciton/superconductor sys- tems, Phys

    V. Kornich, Emergence of a condensate with finite-energy Cooper pairing in hybrid exciton/superconductor sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B110, L060511 (2024)

    2024

  60. [60]

    Bahari, S.-B

    M. Bahari, S.-B. Zhang, C.-A. Li, S.-J. Choi, P. R¨ ußmann, C. Timm, and B. Trauzettel, Helical topo- logical superconducting pairing at finite excitation ener- gies, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 266201 (2024)

    2024

  61. [61]

    M. Wei, L. Xiang, F. Xu, L. Zhang, G. Tang, and J. Wang, Gapless superconducting state and mirage gap in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, L201404 (2024)

    2024

  62. [62]

    Y. Liu, Z. Wang, X. Zhang, C. Liu, Y. Liu, Z. Zhou, J. Wang, Q. Wang, Y. Liu, C. Xi,et al., Interface-induced Zeeman-protected superconductivity in ultrathin crys- talline lead films, Phys. Rev. X8, 021002 (2018)

    2018

  63. [63]

    C. Wang, Y. Xu, and W. Duan, Ising superconductivity and its hidden variants, Acc. Mater. Res.2, 526 (2021)

    2021