pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00080 · v1 · pith:GWAC3M6Jnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.SR

White dwarf planets in star clusters: gravitational scattering versus mass-loss effects

Richard J. Parker (1) , Dimitri Veras (2) ((1) University of Sheffield , UK , (2) University of Warwick , UK) This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 17:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR
keywords white dwarfsexoplanetsstar clustersmass lossgravitational scatteringN-body simulationsfree-floating planetscaptured planets
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mass loss from evolving stars dominates changes to planetary orbits around white dwarfs, outweighing gravitational scattering in birth clusters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper runs N-body simulations of giant planets forming in star clusters and evolving with their host stars into white dwarfs over 1 Gyr. Scattering in dense regions ejects some planets and shifts orbits for up to 20 percent of the survivors, yet mass loss from the star during its post-main-sequence phase controls the orbital evolution more strongly. This dominance appears independent of the cluster's stellar density and largely independent of the planets' starting distances. The runs also generate captured planets and white-dwarf-plus-planet triple systems.

Core claim

Although scattering interactions in dense star-forming regions create free-floating planets and alter the orbital properties of up to 20 per cent of the surviving planets, the effects of mass-loss from the star dominate the dynamics; this behaviour is independent of the stellar density of the birth star-forming region and largely independent of the initial planet orbital properties.

What carries the argument

Self-consistent N-body simulations that couple gravitational star-planet interactions inside clusters with the host stars' evolution into white dwarfs over a full 1 Gyr timescale.

If this is right

  • Scattering produces free-floating planets but changes orbits for no more than 20 percent of survivors.
  • Mass-loss effects remain dominant across all tested cluster densities.
  • The same runs yield captured planets around white dwarfs and white-dwarf-planet triple systems.
  • A synthetic population of giant planets at 1-100 au is generated for comparison with Roman, Gaia and JWST data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • White-dwarf atmospheric pollution studies may treat birth-cluster density as a secondary factor.
  • Extending the runs to multi-planet systems could test whether planet-planet scattering adds measurable effects after mass loss.
  • The results suggest white dwarfs remain useful laboratories for post-main-sequence planet evolution even when birth environments differ.

Load-bearing premise

The simulations capture every important dynamical and evolutionary process without missing effects such as extra planet-planet interactions or incomplete modeling of stellar mass loss.

What would settle it

A large observational sample showing that the fraction of white-dwarf planets with altered orbits rises sharply with the density of their birth clusters would contradict the claim that mass loss dominates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00080 by (2) University of Warwick, Dimitri Veras (2) ((1) University of Sheffield, Richard J. Parker (1), UK, UK).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Dynamical evolution of one of our default simulations (‘A’). We show the positions of stars at 0 Myr, 10 Myr and 1 Gyr. The positions of white dwarf planetary systems where the progenitor has a mass in the range 2 – 2.5M⊙ are shown by the red triangles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mass distributions in our simulations (ten realisations of initial conditions summed together and normalised to numbers per cluster). The open histogram is the initial mass function of the stars. The grey histogram is the final mass function after 1 Gyr, following stellar evolution. The red hatched histogram is the mass distribution of white dwarfs after 1 Gyr (this includes stars initially 2.5 – 8 M⊙ that… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The number of encounters over time in a representative simulation from our default models (set ‘A’). The open histogram shows the number of encounters for all stars, and the red histogram shows the number of encounters for stars that will become white dwarfs after leaving the main sequence. forming region (e.g. Allison et al. 2010). A small number of planets (15 across all ten realisations of the simulatio… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The evolution of semimajor axis (panel a) and eccentricity (panel b) with time in one star cluster for planets orbiting stars with initial masses >2 M⊙. The pairs of vertical lines of the same colours as the points indicate the times of the first and last post-main sequence stellar evolution phases. The points represent values taken at snapshots of 10 Myr intervals during the simulation. The open circle ov… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Semimajor axes distributions of planets orbiting white dwarf progenitors versus the distributions for all planets in the simulations, for dense star-forming regions (ρ˜ ∼ 104 M⊙ pc−3 ) where the initial planet semimajor axes are drawn from a uniform distribution between 0.1 – 50 au (simulation set ‘A’). The final distributions are taken after 1 Gyr. Panel (a) shows the cumulative distributions of the semim… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: As [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Semimajor axes distributions of planets orbiting white dwarf progenitors versus the distributions for all planets in the simulations, for lower-density star-forming regions (ρ˜ ∼ 102 M⊙ pc−3 – simulation set ‘B’) where the initial planet semimajor axes are drawn from a uniform distribution between 0.1 – 50 au. The final distributions are taken after 1 Gyr. Panel (a) shows the cumulative distributions of th… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Semimajor axes distributions of planets in dense (ρ˜ ∼ 104 M⊙ pc−3 ) star-forming regions where the planets shown are those that orbit their original (parent) star. The initial semimajor axes are drawn from delta functions at 0.1 au (a), 1 au (b) and 30 au (c) – simulation sets ‘C’, ‘D’ and ‘E’, respectively. The distributions are taken at 1 Gyr. The cumulative distributions of the semimajor axes of all pl… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Eccentricity distributions in dense (ρ˜ ∼ 104 M⊙ pc−3 ) star￾forming regions after 1 Gyr of dynamical and stellar evolution. The black lines are white dwarf planets and the red lines are all planets. The planet semimajor axes are drawn from a uniform distribution between 0.1 – 50 au (simulation set ‘A’). We show the cumulative distributions of the semimajor axes of all planets (red) and white dwarf planets… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The distributions of periastron distances for white dwarf planets. Panel (a) shows the cumulative distributions of the periastron distances (solid lines) compared to the semimajor axes (dashed lines) after 1 Gyr in the default simulations of dense star-forming region where the initial planet semimajor axes are drawn from a uniform distribution between 0.1 – 50 au (simulation set ‘A’). Panel (b) shows the … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Semimajor axis distributions in our dense star-forming regions (simulation set ‘A’) after 1 Gyr. The black lines are white dwarf planets and the red lines are all planets. The distributions for the birth planets are shown by the dotted lines, and the dis￾tributions for the captured planets are shown by the dashed lines. The summed distributions (captured and birth systems) are shown by the solid lines. 3.… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Three examples of planetary systems in our default simulations (set ‘A’) where the host star is more massive than 1 M⊙ and the system forms a triple with either another star, or a free-floating planet. The lefthand panels (a,d,g) show the evolution (if any) of the mass with time, with the planet-host star shown in black, the planet shown in red, and the captured object shown in green. The middle panels (b… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

White dwarfs are unique laboratories for understanding the formation, evolution and survivability of planetary systems. Post-main sequence mass-loss will change planetary orbital properties and stir up debris discs, leading to the observed pollution of white dwarf atmospheres. However, to date, very few studies have investigated the impact of the stellar birth environment on white dwarf planetary systems. In this paper we simulate the evolution of giant planets around white dwarf progenitors from their formation in a star-forming region until 1Gyr, when the most massive stars ($>$2M$_\odot$) have left the main sequence. Our simulations self-consistently model $N$-body interactions between stars and planets while stars evolve into white dwarfs within the cluster lifetime. We find that although scattering interactions in dense star-forming regions create free-floating planets, and alter the orbital properties of up to 20 per cent of the surviving planets, the effects of mass-loss from the star dominate the dynamics. This behaviour is independent of the stellar density of the birth star-forming region, and largely independent of the initial planet orbital properties. Our simulations produce both captured planets around white dwarfs (potentially similar to WD 0806-661b), and triple systems with white dwarfs and planets (potentially similar to PSR B1620-26(AB)b), and our results yield a population synthesis of giant planets from 1 - 100au that may be relevant to Roman, Gaia and JWST observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents N-body simulations of giant planets around stars in clusters, evolved self-consistently from formation through 1 Gyr (when stars >2 M⊙ become white dwarfs). It reports that stellar encounters produce free-floating planets and alter orbital properties of up to 20% of surviving planets, yet stellar mass-loss dominates the dynamics; this dominance is independent of birth-cluster density and largely independent of initial planet orbits. The runs also generate captured planets and white-dwarf triples analogous to WD 0806-661b and PSR B1620-26(AB)b, yielding a population synthesis for 1–100 au planets.

Significance. If robust, the result would indicate that the stellar birth environment is secondary to post-main-sequence mass-loss in shaping white-dwarf planetary systems, with direct implications for debris-disc stirring, atmospheric pollution, and the interpretation of future Roman, Gaia and JWST detections of wide-orbit giants and captured planets.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the simulations 'self-consistently model N-body interactions between stars and planets' (and the production of captured planets plus triples) is consistent with single-planet-per-star initial conditions and an integrator that omits mutual planet–planet gravity. Under that restriction the quoted 'up to 20 per cent' scattering fraction is necessarily a lower bound; any additional planet–planet ejections or instabilities would increase the dynamical role of scattering relative to mass-loss and could alter the claim that mass-loss 'dominate[s] the dynamics' independently of stellar density.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments. We address the single major comment below, agreeing where the observation is correct and clarifying the implications for our conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the simulations 'self-consistently model N-body interactions between stars and planets' (and the production of captured planets plus triples) is consistent with single-planet-per-star initial conditions and an integrator that omits mutual planet–planet gravity. Under that restriction the quoted 'up to 20 per cent' scattering fraction is necessarily a lower bound; any additional planet–planet ejections or instabilities would increase the dynamical role of scattering relative to mass-loss and could alter the claim that mass-loss 'dominate[s] the dynamics' independently of stellar density.

    Authors: We agree that our simulations adopt single-planet-per-star initial conditions and do not include mutual planet–planet gravitational forces. The reported scattering fraction of up to 20 per cent is therefore a lower bound, and additional planet–planet instabilities could increase the contribution of scattering. Nevertheless, the dominance of stellar mass-loss remains robust because mass-loss induces adiabatic orbital expansion on all planets uniformly and on a timescale set by stellar evolution, independent of cluster density. Scattering, by contrast, is a stochastic, density-dependent process whose maximum effect in our densest models is still only 20 per cent. We will revise the abstract and add a dedicated paragraph in the methods and discussion sections to state the single-planet assumption explicitly, quantify the lower-bound nature of the scattering fraction, and note that multi-planet systems would likely enhance scattering but are unlikely to reverse the mass-loss dominance given the separation of timescales. These changes will be incorporated in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; conclusions from forward N-body integration

full rationale

The paper derives its central claims (mass-loss dominating scattering effects, independence from cluster density, up to 20% orbital alteration) directly from the outputs of N-body simulations initialized with star-forming region conditions and evolved self-consistently to 1 Gyr. No parameters are fitted to white dwarf planet observations, no self-citations underpin uniqueness theorems or ansatzes, and no equations reduce the result to its inputs by construction. The simulation setup (star-planet N-body plus stellar evolution) is independent of the target conclusions, making the derivation self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described. Simulations implicitly rely on standard N-body assumptions and stellar evolution tracks, but none are detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5811 in / 1093 out tokens · 18134 ms · 2026-07-02T17:36:09.837906+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 196 canonical work pages · 42 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S. J. Aarseth and M. H\'enon and R. Wielen. A comparison of numerical methods for the study of star cluster dynamics. A&A. 1974

    1974

  2. [2]

    S. J. Aarseth. From NBODY 1 to NBODY 6: T he G rowth of an I ndustry. PASP. 1999

    1999

  3. [3]

    S. J. Aarseth. N BODY2: A direct N -body integration code. New A. 2001

    2001

  4. [4]

    Gravitational N-Body Simulations, by Sverre J

    Gravitational N-Body Simulations. Gravitational N-Body Simulations, by Sverre J. Aarseth, pp. 430. ISBN 0521432723. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, November 2003. , year = 2003, month = nov, editor =

    2003

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    The Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. , keywords =

  6. [6]

    H. A. Abt and A. E. Gomez and S. G. Levy. The Frequency and Formation Mechanism of B2--B5 Main-Sequence Binaries. ApJS. 1990

    1990

  7. [7]

    Observed Orbital Eccentricities. II. Late-Type Stars. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/507457 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/507457

  8. [8]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Spectral Evolution of Young Stellar Objects. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/164924 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/164924

  9. [9]

    J. D. Adams and J. R. Stauffer and D. G. Monet and M. F. Skrutskie and C. A. Beichman. The Mass and Structure of the Pleiades Star Cluster from 2MASS. AJ. 2001

    2001

  10. [10]

    F. C. Adams. Theoretical Models of Young Open Star Clusters: Effects of a Gaseous Component and Gas Removal. ApJ. 2000

    2000

  11. [11]

    F. C. Adams and G. Laughlin. Constraints of the birth aggregate of the Solar system. Icarus. 2001

    2001

  12. [12]

    F. C. Adams and D. Hollenbach and G. Laughlin and U. Gorti. Photoevaporation of Circumstellar Disks Due to External Far-Ultraviolet Radiation in Stellar Aggregates. ApJ. 2004

    2004

  13. [13]

    F. C. Adams and E. M Proszkow and M. Fatuzzo and P. C. Myers. Early evolution on stellar groups and clusters: environmental effects on forming planetary systems. ApJ. 2006

    2006

  14. [14]

    F. C. Adams. The Birth Environment of the Solar System. ARA&A. 2010

    2010

  15. [15]

    ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Distributions of Short-lived Radioactive Nuclei Produced by Young Embedded Star Clusters. ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/86 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/789/1/86

  16. [16]

    2002 , month =

    Brown dwarf populations in open clusters. MNRAS , eprint =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05413.x , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05413.x 2002

  17. [17]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Probing the role of the galactic environment in the formation of stellar clusters, using M83 as a test bench. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1203 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1203

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Testing the accretion scenario of Boo stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243058 , archivePrefix =. 2202.05066 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243058

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    Searching for Boo stars in binary systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553969 , archivePrefix =. 2503.07241 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553969

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    On the mass segregation of cores and stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2646 , archivePrefix =. 1909.07982 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2646 1909

  21. [21]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Looking for phase-space structures in star-forming regions: an MST-based methodology. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2822 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2822

  22. [22]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Primordial mass and density segregation in a young molecular cloud. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly075 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly075

  23. [23]

    The Dispersal of Protoplanetary Disks

    The Dispersal of Protoplanetary Disks. arXiv: 1311.1819 , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    R. L. Allen and G. M. Berstein and R. Malhotra. The Edge of the Solar System. ApJ. 2001

    2001

  25. [25]

    The Structure and Evolution of Young Stellar Clusters

    The Structure and Evolution of Young Stellar Clusters. Protostars and Planets V , year = 2007, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0603096 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0603096 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0603096 2007

  26. [26]

    R. J. Allison and S. P. Goodwin and R. J. Parker and S. F. Portegies Zwart and R. de Grijs and M. B. N. Kouwenhoven. Using the minimum spanning tree to trace Mass Segregation. MNRAS. 2009

    2009

  27. [27]

    R. J. Allison and S. P. Goodwin and R. J. Parker and R. de Grijs and S. F. Portegies Zwart and M. B. N. Kouwenhoven. Dynamical Mass Segregation on a Very Short Timescale. ApJ. 2009

    2009

  28. [28]

    R. J. Allison and S. P. Goodwin and R. J. Parker and S. F. Portegies Zwart and R. de Grijs. The early dynamical evolution of cool, clumpy star clusters. MNRAS. 2010

    2010

  29. [29]

    R. J. Allison and S. P. Goodwin. The formation of Trapezium systems. MNRAS. 2011

    2011

  30. [30]

    R. J. Allison. Testing the initial conditions and dynamical evolution of star clusters using Gaia- I. MNRAS. 2012

    2012

  31. [31]

    , eprint =

    The mass function of dense molecular cores and the origin of the IMF. , eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066389 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066389

  32. [32]

    A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Spectroscopy of new brown dwarf members of Ophiuchi and an updated initial mass function. A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118230 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118230

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    A Case of Simultaneous Star and Planet Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abc550 , archivePrefix =. 2010.15135 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abc550 2041

  34. [34]

    , year = 1937, month = jan, volume =

    On the Statistics of Double Stars. , year = 1937, month = jan, volume =

    1937

  35. [35]

    Anders and H

    P. Anders and H. Baumgardt snd N. Bissantz and S. Portegies Zwart. How well to Starlab and NBODY4 compare? I. Simple models. MNRAS. 2009

    2009

  36. [36]

    Andersen and M

    M. Andersen and M. R. Meyer and J. Greissl and A. Aversa. Evidence for a turnover in the Initial Mass Function of low-mass stars and substellar objects: analysis from an ensemble of young clusters. ApJL. 2008

    2008

  37. [37]

    A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The low-mass initial mass function in the Orion nebula cluster based on HST/NICMOS III imaging. A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117062 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117062

  38. [38]

    Andre and D

    P. Andre and D. Ward-Thompson and M. Barsony. Submillimeter continuum observations of Rho Ophiuchi A - The candidate protostar VLA 1623 and prestellar clumps. ApJ. 1993

    1993

  39. [39]

    Andre and T Montmerle

    P. Andre and T Montmerle. From T Tauri stars to protostars: Circumstellar material and young stellar objects in the rho Ophiuchi cloud. ApJ. 1994

    1994

  40. [40]

    Andre and D

    P. Andre and D. Ward-Thompson and M. Barsony. From Prestellar Cores to Protostars: the Initial Conditions of Star Formation. Protostars and Planets IV. 2000

    2000

  41. [41]

    A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    From filamentary clouds to prestellar cores to the stellar IMF: Initial highlights from the Herschel Gould Belt Survey. A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014666 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014666

  42. [42]

    Protostars and Planets VI , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    From Filamentary Networks to Dense Cores in Molecular Clouds: Toward a New Paradigm for Star Formation. Protostars and Planets VI , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002

  43. [43]

    ApJL , eprint =

    Submillimeter Array Observations of Disks in the SR 24 Multiple Star System. ApJL , eprint =. doi:10.1086/427325 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/427325

  44. [44]

    Protoplanetary Disk Structures in Ophiuchus. II. Extension to Fainter Sources. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/723/2/1241 , archivePrefix =. 1007.5070 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/723/2/1241

  45. [45]

    The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). I. Motivation, Sample, Calibration, and Overview. ApJL , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 , archivePrefix =. 1812.04040 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 2041

  46. [46]

    Big Fish in Small Ponds: Massive Stars in the Low Mass Clusters of M83

    Big Fish in Small Ponds: Massive Stars in the Low-mass Clusters of M83. ApJ , keywords =. 2014. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/793/1/4 , archivePrefix =. 1407.4547 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/793/1/4 2014

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    On the possible origin of Boo stars. , keywords =

  48. [48]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    An ALMA Survey of Protoplanetary Disks in the Orionis Cluster. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa69c0 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa69c0

  49. [49]

    ALMA Survey of Lupus Protoplanetary Disks. II. Gas Disk Radii. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab890 , archivePrefix =. 1803.05923 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab890

  50. [50]

    Mixing of metals during star cluster formation: statistics and implications for chemical tagging

    Mixing of metals during star cluster formation: statistics and implications for chemical tagging. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2625 , archivePrefix =. 1807.01712 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2625

  51. [51]

    A&A , eprint =

    Suppression of giant planet formation in stellar clusters. A&A , eprint =

  52. [52]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    How do binary clusters form?. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1719 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1719

  53. [53]

    A method to analyse velocity structure

    A method to analyse velocity structure. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3409 , archivePrefix =. 1812.05628 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3409

  54. [54]

    Artigau and D

    \'E . Artigau and D. Lafreni \`e re and R. Doyon and L. Albert and D. Nadeau and J. Robert. Discovery of the Widest Very Low Mass Binary. ApJ. 2007

    2007

  55. [55]

    A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Characterizing interstellar filaments with Herschel in IC 5146. A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116596 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116596

  56. [56]

    A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    No evidence of mass segregation in massive young clusters. A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200809886 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200809886

  57. [57]

    R. E. Attwood and S. P. Goodwin and D. Stamatellos and A. P. Whitworth. Simulating star formation in molecular cloud cores. IV. The role of turbulence and thermodynamics. A&A. 2009

    2009

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    Isolating Dust and Free-Free Emission in ONC Proplyds with ALMA Band 3 Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace901 , archivePrefix =. 2308.07369 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace901

  59. [59]

    , keywords =

    Long-term stability of planets in and around binary stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2324 , archivePrefix =. 2108.07815 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2324

  60. [60]

    A&A , eprint =

    Evolutionary models for solar metallicity low-mass stars: mass-magnitude relationships and color-magnitude diagrams. A&A , eprint =

  61. [61]

    Evolutionary models for low-mass stars and brown dwarfs: uncertainties and limits at very young ages

    Evolutionary models for low-mass stars and brown dwarfs: Uncertainties and limits at very young ages. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011638 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0111385 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011638

  62. [62]

    A Substellar Mass Function for Alpha Per

    A substellar mass function for Alpha Persei. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021262 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0209032 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021262

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    Stellar Flybys Interrupting Planet-Planet Scattering Generates Oort Planets. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab2d2a , archivePrefix =. 1905.07044 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab2d2a 1905

  64. [64]

    Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. V. Geometric and Photogeometric Distances to 1.47 Billion Stars in Gaia Early Data Release 3. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 , archivePrefix =. 2012.05220 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 2012

  65. [65]

    New evolutionary models for pre-main sequence and main sequence low-mass stars down to the hydrogen-burning limit

    New evolutionary models for pre-main sequence and main sequence low-mass stars down to the hydrogen-burning limit. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 , archivePrefix =. 1503.04107 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425481

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    The second data release of the INT Photometric H Survey of the Northern Galactic Plane (IPHAS DR2). , keywords =

  67. [67]

    Optical spectroscopy of isolated planetary mass objects in the sigma Orionis cluster

    Optical spectroscopy of isolated planetary mass objects in the Orionis cluster. A&A , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011152 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0108249 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011152

  68. [68]

    Basri and A

    G. Basri and A. Reiners. A survey for spectroscopic binaries among very low mass stars. AJ. 2006

    2006

  69. [69]

    Bastian and S

    N. Bastian and S. P. Goodwin. Evidence for the strong effect of gas removal on the internal dynamics of young stellar clusters. MNRAS. 2006

    2006

  70. [70]

    2007 , month =

    Hierarchical star formation in M33: fundamental properties of the star-forming regions. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12064.x , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12064.x 2007

  71. [71]

    Bastian and M

    N. Bastian and M. Gieles and S. P. Goodwin and G. Trancho and L. J. Smith and I. Konstantopoulos and Yu . Efremov. The early expansion of cluster cores. MNRAS. 2008

    2008

  72. [72]

    2008 , month =

    On the star formation rate - brightest cluster relation: estimating the peak star formation rate in post-merger galaxies. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13775.x , archivePrefix =. 0807.4687 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13775.x 2008

  73. [73]

    Bastian and M

    N. Bastian and M. Gieles and B. Ercolano and R. Gutermuth. The spatial evolution of stellar structures in the LArge Magellanic Cloud. MNRAS. 2009

    2009

  74. [74]

    Bastian and K

    N. Bastian and K. R. Covey and M. R. Meyer. A Universal Stellar Initial Mass Function? A Critical Look at Variations. ARA&A. 2010

    2010

  75. [75]

    Stellar Clusters & Associations: A RIA Workshop on Gaia , year = 2011, pages =

    Cluster Disruption: From Infant Mortality to Long Term Survival. Stellar Clusters & Associations: A RIA Workshop on Gaia , year = 2011, pages =

    2011

  76. [76]

    MNRAS , eprint =

    Modelling accretion in protobinary systems. MNRAS , eprint =

  77. [77]

    M. R. Bate. Collapse of a Molecular Cloud Core to Stellar Densities: the First Three-dimensional Calculations. ApJ. 1998

    1998

  78. [78]

    M. R. Bate and C. J. Clarke and M. J. McCaughrean. Interpreting the mean surface density of companions in star forming regions. MNRAS. 1998

    1998

  79. [79]

    M. R. Bate and I. A. Bonnell and V. Bromm. The formation mechanism of brown dwarfs. MNRAS. 2002

    2002

  80. [80]

    M. R. Bate and I. A. Bonnell and V. Bromm. The formation of a star cluster: predicting the properties of stars and brown dwarfs. MNRAS. 2003

    2003

Showing first 80 references.