pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00528 · v1 · pith:JHMCNHFNnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· hep-th

Finite modular Coleman-Weinberg inflation

Yoshihiko Abe , Komei Goto , Tetsutaro Higaki , Junichiro Kawamura , Tatsuo Kobayashi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 10:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords modular symmetryColeman-Weinberg inflationmodulus fieldaxion cosmologyisocurvature perturbationsreheatingcosmological observations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A modular symmetric model generates inflation from a Coleman-Weinberg potential generated by heavy quarks coupled via modular forms, with the imaginary part of the modulus as inflaton and the real part as a heavy axion that can produce dete

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes an inflationary model based on modular symmetry where a Coleman-Weinberg potential arises from integrating out heavy vector-like quarks coupled to the modulus field through modular forms. In this setup the imaginary part of the complex modulus serves as the inflaton and accounts for current cosmological observations. The real part acts as a heavy axion that dominates the energy density after reheating but decays before Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. Its quantum fluctuations reach about one percent of the inflaton level and can produce isocurvature perturbations that future observations might detect. Reheating proceeds through modulus-dependent gauge kinetic functions.

Core claim

The model uses a Coleman-Weinberg potential generated by integrating out heavy vector-like quarks that couple to the complex modulus field τ through modular forms. The imaginary part of τ is the inflaton while the real part is a heavy axion. The model matches current cosmological observations. Reheating proceeds via modulus-dependent gauge kinetic functions. The axion oscillation dominates after inflaton decay and decays before Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. The axion quantum fluctuation is O(1)% of the inflaton fluctuation, inducing potentially detectable isocurvature perturbations.

What carries the argument

Coleman-Weinberg potential generated by integrating out heavy vector-like quarks coupled to the complex modulus τ through modular forms, with Im(τ) as inflaton and Re(τ) as heavy axion.

If this is right

  • The model accounts for current cosmological observations.
  • Reheating occurs through modulus-dependent gauge kinetic functions.
  • The axion dominates the universe after reheating via inflaton decay.
  • The axion decays before Big Bang Nucleosynthesis in the viable parameter region.
  • Axion quantum fluctuations at the O(1)% level can induce isocurvature perturbations detectable in future observations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The construction directly embeds inflation inside finite modular symmetry without extra scalar fields.
  • Precision measurements of isocurvature modes in the cosmic microwave background could bound the allowed modular forms.
  • The same mechanism may generate different inflationary potentials by varying the modular weight or the number of integrated-out quarks.
  • Axion domination after reheating offers a concrete link between modular symmetry and late-time cosmology before nucleosynthesis.

Load-bearing premise

Integrating out heavy vector-like quarks coupled to the complex modulus field through modular forms produces a viable Coleman-Weinberg potential in which the imaginary part of the modulus can serve as the inflaton while the real part remains a heavy axion.

What would settle it

Measurement showing axion quantum fluctuations far from O(1)% of the inflaton level or the axion failing to decay before Big Bang Nucleosynthesis in the parameter region that otherwise fits the inflationary observables.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00528 by Junichiro Kawamura, Komei Goto, Tatsuo Kobayashi, Tetsutaro Higaki, Yoshihiko Abe.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: We show the normalized CW potential with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Inflationary observables in the CW potential. The left panels show the predictions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a modular symmetric inflationary model based on a Coleman--Weinberg potential generated by integrating out heavy vector-like quarks that couple to the complex modulus field $\tau$ through modular forms. In this framework, the imaginary part of modulus $\tau$ plays the role of the inflaton, while the real part is identified with a heavy axion. We show that the model successfully explains the current cosmological observations. We further discuss reheating through modulus-dependent gauge kinetic functions and the cosmology of the axion. The axion oscillation dominates over the Universe after the reheating via inflaton decay, and then it decays before Big Bang Nucleosynthesis in the viable parameter region. The quantum fluctuation of the axion can be of order $\mathcal{O}(1)\% $ of that of the inflaton, which would induce isocurvature perturbations that may be detectable in future observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a modular symmetric inflationary model based on a Coleman-Weinberg potential generated by integrating out heavy vector-like quarks coupled to the complex modulus field τ through modular forms. The imaginary part of τ is identified as the inflaton and the real part as a heavy axion. The manuscript claims that the model successfully explains current cosmological observations, discusses reheating through modulus-dependent gauge kinetic functions, and analyzes the axion cosmology, including that axion oscillations dominate post-reheating, decay before BBN, and generate O(1)% isocurvature perturbations relative to the inflaton that may be detectable in future observations.

Significance. If the effective-field-theory construction remains valid along the full trajectory, the work supplies a concrete realization of inflation within finite modular symmetry that matches observations while making a falsifiable prediction for isocurvature modes at the percent level. The reheating and axion-decay analysis also ties the model to post-inflationary cosmology in a parameter region that avoids BBN conflicts.

major comments (2)
  1. [Potential derivation and inflationary trajectory (near Eq. for the CW potential)] The central claim that the model explains cosmological observations rests on the validity of the Coleman-Weinberg potential obtained by integrating out the vector-like quarks. The manuscript must explicitly verify (e.g., in the section deriving the potential and the inflationary trajectory) that every quark mass eigenvalue remains ≫ H_inflation for the entire range of Im(τ) traversed during inflation, for the specific modular forms chosen; otherwise the integration-out step fails and the derived potential is invalid.
  2. [Axion cosmology and isocurvature section] The statement that the axion fluctuation is O(1)% of the inflaton fluctuation and may produce detectable isocurvature perturbations requires a quantitative calculation of the power spectra and the isocurvature fraction; the current claim appears to rest on an order-of-magnitude estimate rather than a full two-field perturbation analysis.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model setup] Notation for the modular forms and the precise definition of the vector-like quark mass matrix should be stated explicitly at first use rather than assumed from prior literature.
  2. [Figures] Figure showing the potential along the inflationary trajectory would benefit from an inset or separate panel displaying the quark mass eigenvalues versus Im(τ) to address the EFT-validity concern directly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Potential derivation and inflationary trajectory (near Eq. for the CW potential)] The central claim that the model explains cosmological observations rests on the validity of the Coleman-Weinberg potential obtained by integrating out the vector-like quarks. The manuscript must explicitly verify (e.g., in the section deriving the potential and the inflationary trajectory) that every quark mass eigenvalue remains ≫ H_inflation for the entire range of Im(τ) traversed during inflation, for the specific modular forms chosen; otherwise the integration-out step fails and the derived potential is invalid.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the validity of the effective-field-theory construction. The parameter region and modular forms in the manuscript were chosen such that the vector-like quark masses remain well above the inflationary Hubble scale along the entire trajectory. To make this fully transparent, we will add a dedicated paragraph and supporting figure in the potential derivation section of the revised manuscript that explicitly confirms m_q ≫ H_inflation for all eigenvalues over the relevant range of Im(τ). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Axion cosmology and isocurvature section] The statement that the axion fluctuation is O(1)% of the inflaton fluctuation and may produce detectable isocurvature perturbations requires a quantitative calculation of the power spectra and the isocurvature fraction; the current claim appears to rest on an order-of-magnitude estimate rather than a full two-field perturbation analysis.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a linearized two-field perturbation analysis provides greater rigor than an order-of-magnitude estimate. Our O(1)% figure follows from the relative field excursions and the large mass hierarchy that stabilizes the axion direction during inflation. In the revised manuscript we will include an explicit two-field calculation of the curvature and isocurvature power spectra, together with the resulting isocurvature fraction, to substantiate the estimate quantitatively. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper constructs an effective Coleman-Weinberg potential by integrating out vector-like quarks whose masses depend on modular forms of the complex modulus τ, then identifies Im(τ) as the inflaton and compares the resulting slow-roll predictions to cosmological data. No quoted equation or step reduces the output to the input by construction, nor does any load-bearing claim rest on a self-citation chain that itself lacks independent verification. Parameter choices to match n_s and r are standard fitting, not a redefinition of the observables themselves. The EFT validity along the trajectory is a correctness issue, not a circularity issue.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger reflects elements stated there. The model relies on standard effective field theory and cosmological assumptions rather than new axioms or entities; no explicit free parameters are named.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Coleman-Weinberg potential can be generated by integrating out heavy vector-like quarks coupled via modular forms to the modulus τ.
    This is the core mechanism proposed in the abstract for generating the inflationary potential.
  • domain assumption Standard cosmological observations can be used to validate the inflationary model and axion cosmology.
    Invoked when claiming the model explains current observations and predicts detectable isocurvature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5690 in / 1467 out tokens · 60505 ms · 2026-07-02T10:47:42.526948+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 25 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Are neutrino masses modular forms?

    F. Feruglio,Are neutrino masses modular forms?, pp. 227–266. 2019. 1706.08749 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    Neutrino mixing from finite modular groups

    T. Kobayashi, K. Tanaka, and T. H. Tatsuishi,Neutrino mixing from finite modular groups, Phys. Rev. D98no. 1, (2018) 016004 [1803.10391 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Modular $A_4$ invariance and neutrino mixing

    T. Kobayashi, N. Omoto, Y. Shimizu, K. Takagi, M. Tanimoto, and T. H. Tatsuishi,Modular A4 invariance and neutrino mixing, JHEP11(2018) 196 [1808.03012 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    J. T. Penedo and S. T. Petcov,Lepton Masses and Mixing from ModularS 4 Symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B939(2019) 292–307 [1806.11040 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    P. P. Novichkov, J. T. Penedo, S. T. Petcov, and A. V. Titov,Modular A 5 symmetry for flavour model building, JHEP04(2019) 174 [1812.02158 [hep-ph]]. 21

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Feruglio, V

    F. Feruglio, V. Gherardi, A. Romanino, and A. Titov,Modular invariant dynamics and fermion mass hierarchies aroundτ=i, JHEP05(2021) 242 [2101.08718 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    P. P. Novichkov, J. T. Penedo, and S. T. Petcov,Fermion mass hierarchies, large lepton mixing and residual modular symmetries, JHEP04(2021) 206 [2102.07488 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    S. T. Petcov and M. Tanimoto,A 4 modular flavour model of quark mass hierarchies close to the fixed pointτ=ω, Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 7, (2023) 579 [2212.13336 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Y. Abe, T. Higaki, J. Kawamura, and T. Kobayashi,Quark masses and CKM hierarchies from S′ 4 modular flavor symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 12, (2023) 1140 [2301.07439 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Kikuchi, T

    S. Kikuchi, T. Kobayashi, K. Nasu, S. Takada, and H. Uchida,Quark hierarchical structures in modular symmetric flavor models at level 6, Phys. Rev. D107no. 5, (2023) 055014 [2301.03737 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Kikuchi, T

    S. Kikuchi, T. Kobayashi, K. Nasu, S. Takada, and H. Uchida,Quark mass hierarchies and CP violation in A 4 ×A 4 ×A 4 modular symmetric flavor models, JHEP07(2023) 134 [2302.03326 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Y. Abe, T. Higaki, J. Kawamura, and T. Kobayashi,Quark and lepton hierarchies from S4’ modular flavor symmetry, Phys. Lett. B842(2023) 137977 [2302.11183 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    S. T. Petcov and M. Tanimoto,A 4 modular flavour model of quark mass hierarchies close to the fixed pointτ= i∞, JHEP08(2023) 086 [2306.05730 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    de Medeiros Varzielas, M

    I. de Medeiros Varzielas, M. Levy, J. T. Penedo, and S. T. Petcov,Quarks at the modular S 4 cusp, JHEP09(2023) 196 [2307.14410 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Y. Abe, T. Higaki, J. Kawamura, and T. Kobayashi,Fermion hierarchies inSU(5)grand unification fromΓ ′ 6 modular flavor symmetry, JHEP08(2023) 097 [2307.01419 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Kobayashi and M

    T. Kobayashi and M. Tanimoto,Modular flavor symmetric models, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39 no. 09n10, (2024) 2441012 [2307.03384 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Ding and S

    G.-J. Ding and S. F. King,Neutrino mass and mixing with modular symmetry, Rept. Prog. Phys.87no. 8, (2024) 084201 [2311.09282 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Ferrara, D

    S. Ferrara, D. Lust, A. D. Shapere, and S. Theisen,Modular Invariance in Supersymmetric Field Theories, Phys. Lett. B225(1989) 363

    1989

  19. [19]

    A. Font, L. E. Ibanez, D. Lust, and F. Quevedo,Supersymmetry Breaking From Duality Invariant Gaugino Condensation, Phys. Lett. B245(1990) 401–408

    1990

  20. [20]

    Cvetic, A

    M. Cvetic, A. Font, L. E. Ibanez, D. Lust, and F. Quevedo,Target space duality, supersymmetry breaking and the stability of classical string vacua, Nucl. Phys. B361(1991) 194–232

    1991

  21. [21]

    Ferrara, N

    S. Ferrara, N. Magnoli, T. R. Taylor, and G. Veneziano,Duality and supersymmetry breaking in string theory, Phys. Lett. B245(1990) 409–416

    1990

  22. [22]

    Ishiguro, T

    K. Ishiguro, T. Kobayashi, and H. Otsuka,Landscape of Modular Symmetric Flavor Models, JHEP03(2021) 161 [2011.09154 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Ishiguro, H

    K. Ishiguro, H. Okada, and H. Otsuka,Residual flavor symmetry breaking in the landscape of modular flavor models, JHEP09(2022) 072 [2206.04313 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Kobayashi, Y

    T. Kobayashi, Y. Shimizu, K. Takagi, M. Tanimoto, and T. H. Tatsuishi,A 4 lepton flavor model and modulus stabilization fromS 4 modular symmetry, Phys. Rev. D100no. 11, (2019) 115045 [1909.05139 [hep-ph]]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 101, 039904 (2020)]. 22

    work page arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Kobayashi, Y

    T. Kobayashi, Y. Shimizu, K. Takagi, M. Tanimoto, T. H. Tatsuishi, and H. Uchida,CP violation in modular invariant flavor models, Phys. Rev. D101no. 5, (2020) 055046 [1910.11553 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    P. P. Novichkov, J. T. Penedo, and S. T. Petcov,Modular flavour symmetries and modulus stabilisation, JHEP03(2022) 149 [2201.02020 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Knapp-Perez, X.-G

    V. Knapp-Perez, X.-G. Liu, H. P. Nilles, S. Ramos-Sanchez, and M. Ratz,Matter matters in moduli fixing and modular flavor symmetries, Phys. Lett. B844(2023) 138106 [2304.14437 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Kobayashi, K

    T. Kobayashi, K. Nasu, R. Sakuma, and Y. Yamada,Radiative correction on moduli stabilization in modular flavor symmetric models, Phys. Rev. D108no. 11, (2023) 115038 [2310.15604 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Y. Abe, K. Goto, T. Higaki, T. Kobayashi, and K. Nasu,Modulus Stabilization in Finite Modular Symmetric Models, PTEP2025no. 2, (2025) 023B02 [2405.08316 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Higaki, T

    T. Higaki, T. Kobayashi, K. Nasu, and H. Otsuka,Spontaneous CP violation and partially broken modular flavor symmetries, JHEP09(2024) 024 [2405.18813 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Higaki, J

    T. Higaki, J. Kawamura, and T. Kobayashi,Finite modular axion and radiative moduli stabilization, JHEP04(2024) 147 [2402.02071 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Funakoshi, J

    S. Funakoshi, J. Kawamura, T. Kobayashi, K. Nasu, and H. Otsuka,Moduli stabilization and light axion by Siegel modular forms, JHEP03(2025) 093 [2409.19261 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Modular invariant inflation

    T. Kobayashi, D. Nitta, and Y. Urakawa,Modular invariant inflation, JCAP08(2016) 014 [1604.02995 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Elliptic Inflation: Interpolating from natural inflation to $R^2$-inflation

    T. Higaki and F. Takahashi,Elliptic inflation: interpolating from natural inflation to R2-inflation, JHEP03(2015) 129 [1501.02354 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    Modular Inflation Observables and $j$-Inflation Phenomenology

    R. Schimmrigk,Modular Inflation Observables andj-Inflation Phenomenology, JHEP09(2017) 043 [1612.09559 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    Schimmrigk,Large and small field inflation from hyperbolic sigma models, Phys

    R. Schimmrigk,Large and small field inflation from hyperbolic sigma models, Phys. Rev. D105 no. 6, (2022) 063541 [2108.05400 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Y. Abe, T. Higaki, F. Kaneko, T. Kobayashi, and H. Otsuka,Moduli inflation from modular flavor symmetries, JHEP06(2023) 187 [2303.02947 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    G. F. Casas and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez,Modular invariant Starobinsky inflation and the Species Scale, JHEP04(2025) 041 [2407.12081 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    S. Aoki, H. Otsuka, and R. Yanagita,Higgs-modular inflation, Phys. Rev. D112no. 4, (2025) 043505 [2504.01622 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Ding, S.-Y

    G.-J. Ding, S.-Y. Jiang, and W. Zhao,Modular invariant slow roll inflation, JCAP10(2024) 016 [2405.06497 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    S. F. King and X. Wang,Modular invariant hilltop inflation, JCAP07(2024) 073 [2405.08924 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Ding, S.-Y

    G.-J. Ding, S.-Y. Jiang, Y. Xu, and W. Zhao,Modular invariant inflation and reheating, JHEP 11(2025) 141 [2411.18603 [hep-ph]]. 23

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Jiang, W

    S.-Y. Jiang, W. Zhao, and G.-J. Ding,Sp(4,Z) modular inflation, JCAP05(2026) 090 [2512.21597 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    Kikuchi, T

    S. Kikuchi, T. Kobayashi, and K. Nasu,CP phase in modular flavor models and discrete Froggatt-Nielsen models, Phys. Rev. D109no. 11, (2024) 115018 [2312.11809 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Double exponents in SL(2,Z) cosmology, JCAP07(2025) 062 [2412.19324 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,SL(2,Z) cosmological attractors, JCAP04(2025) 045 [2408.05203 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo, and I. Zavala,String cosmology: From the early universe to today, Phys. Rept.1059(2024) 1–155 [2303.04819 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Recent progress on inflation and dark energy from string theory

    M. Cicoli,Recent progress on inflation and dark energy from string theory, Gen. Rel. Grav.58 no. 4, (2026) 33 [2604.16281 [hep-th]]. [49]PlanckCollaboration, Y. Akramiet al.,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A10 [1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]]. [50]PlanckCollaboration, N. Aghanimet al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmol...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    T. H. Jung and J. Kawamura,Finite modular majoron, JHEP07(2024) 145 [2405.03996 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Higaki, J

    T. Higaki, J. Kawamura, T. Kobayashi, K. Nasu, and R. Sakuma,Large and small hierarchies from finite modular symmetries, JHEP05(2025) 111 [2412.18435 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    De Sitter Vacua from Matter Superpotentials

    O. Lebedev, H. P. Nilles, and M. Ratz,De Sitter vacua from matter superpotentials, Phys. Lett. B636(2006) 126–131 [hep-th/0603047]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  52. [52]

    H. Abe, T. Higaki, T. Kobayashi, and Y. Omura,Moduli stabilization, F-term uplifting and soft supersymmetry breaking terms, Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 025019 [hep-th/0611024]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  53. [53]

    Moduli stabilization and uplifting with dynamically generated F-terms

    E. Dudas, C. Papineau, and S. Pokorski,Moduli stabilization and uplifting with dynamically generated F-terms, JHEP02(2007) 028 [hep-th/0610297]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Locally stable non-supersymmetric Minkowski vacua in supergravity

    M. Gomez-Reino and C. A. Scrucca,Locally stable non-supersymmetric Minkowski vacua in supergravity, JHEP05(2006) 015 [hep-th/0602246]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  55. [55]

    O'KKLT

    R. Kallosh and A. D. Linde,O’KKLT, JHEP02(2007) 002 [hep-th/0611183]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  56. [56]

    H. Abe, T. Higaki, and T. Kobayashi,More about F-term uplifting, Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 105003 [0707.2671 [hep-th]]. [59]ACTCollaboration, T. Louiset al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods andΛCDM Parameters, 2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  57. [57]

    Tristramet al.,Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck data, Phys

    M. Tristramet al.,Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck data, Phys. Rev. D105no. 8, (2022) 083524 [2112.07961 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    TASI Lectures on Inflation

    D. Baumann,Inflation, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Physics of the Large and the Small, pp. 523–686. 2011. 0907.5424 [hep-th]. 24

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest,Atacama Cosmology Telescope, South Pole Telescope, and Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 16, (2025) 161001 [2503.21030 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    S. T. Petcov and M. Tanimoto,S ′ 4 Quark Flavour Model in the Vicinity of the Fixed Point τ=i∞, 2601.04529 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  61. [61]

    V. S. Kaplunovsky,One Loop Threshold Effects in String Unification, Nucl. Phys. B307(1988) 145–156 [hep-th/9205068]. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 382, 436–438 (1992)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  62. [62]

    L. J. Dixon, V. Kaplunovsky, and J. Louis,Moduli dependence of string loop corrections to gauge coupling constants, Nucl. Phys. B355(1991) 649–688

    1991

  63. [63]

    Feruglio, A

    F. Feruglio, A. Strumia, and A. Titov,Modular invariance and the QCD angle, JHEP07(2023) 027 [2305.08908 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Feruglio, M

    F. Feruglio, M. Parriciatu, A. Strumia, and A. Titov,Solving the strong CP problem without axions, JHEP08(2024) 214 [2406.01689 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Feruglio, A

    F. Feruglio, A. Marrone, A. Strumia, and A. Titov,Solving the strong CP problem in string-inspired theories with modular invariance, 2505.20395 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    J. P. Derendinger, S. Ferrara, C. Kounnas, and F. Zwirner,On loop corrections to string effective field theories: Field dependent gauge couplings and sigma model anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B372(1992) 145–188

    1992

  67. [67]

    L. E. Ibanez and D. Lust,Duality anomaly cancellation, minimal string unification and the effective low-energy Lagrangian of 4-D strings, Nucl. Phys. B382(1992) 305–361 [hep-th/9202046]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  68. [68]

    Dark Radiation in LARGE Volume Models

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, and F. Quevedo,Dark radiation in LARGE volume models, Phys. Rev. D87no. 4, (2013) 043520 [1208.3562 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  69. [69]

    Dark Radiation and Dark Matter in Large Volume Compactifications

    T. Higaki and F. Takahashi,Dark Radiation and Dark Matter in Large Volume Compactifications, JHEP11(2012) 125 [1208.3563 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  70. [70]

    Moduli-Induced Axion Problem

    T. Higaki, K. Nakayama, and F. Takahashi,Moduli-Induced Axion Problem, JHEP07(2013) 005 [1304.7987 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    D. H. Lyth, C. Ungarelli, and D. Wands,The Primordial density perturbation in the curvaton scenario, Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 023503 [astro-ph/0208055]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  72. [72]

    Non-Gaussianity of the primordial perturbation in the curvaton model

    M. Sasaki, J. Valiviita, and D. Wands,Non-Gaussianity of the primordial perturbation in the curvaton model, Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 103003 [astro-ph/0607627]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  73. [73]

    Non-Gaussianity from Curvatons Revisited

    M. Kawasaki, T. Kobayashi, and F. Takahashi,Non-Gaussianity from Curvatons Revisited, Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 123506 [1107.6011 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  74. [74]

    H. Abe, T. Higaki, and T. Kobayashi,Remark on integrating out heavy moduli in flux compactification, Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 045012 [hep-th/0606095]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  75. [75]

    I. Bena, J. Bl˚ ab¨ ack, M. Gra˜ na, and S. L¨ ust,The tadpole problem, JHEP11(2021) 223 [2010.10519 [hep-th]]. 25

    work page arXiv 2021