pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00900 · v1 · pith:RNAPMA23new · submitted 2026-07-01 · ⚛️ nucl-ex · nucl-th

Nuclear electromagnetic moments by spin-precession methods

Georgi Georgiev , Dimiter L. Balabanski , Andrew E.Stuchbery , Hideki Ueno This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 01:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex nucl-th
keywords nuclear electromagnetic momentsspin-precession methodstransient fieldexotic nucleishell model calculationsislands of inversionhigh-spin statesbeta-NMR
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spin-precession methods have supplied nuclear magnetic and quadrupole moments that test shell-model descriptions of exotic nuclei and high-spin states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews nuclear moment measurements performed with spin-precession techniques across roughly thirty years. It presents the common formalism for extracting moments and details five specific methods, with emphasis on their use for short-lived and exotic nuclei. The central claim is that these measurements have delivered concrete data on g-factors and quadrupole moments that allow direct comparison with large-basis shell-model calculations and have clarified the character of weakly collective nuclei, the onset of collectivity, and the structure inside the N=20, N=28 and N=40 islands of inversion. A reader would care because the moments give model-independent electromagnetic observables that anchor theoretical pictures of how protons and neutrons organize far from stability.

Core claim

Nuclear moment studies carried out with spin-precession methods at and after the turn of the millennium show that transient-field data on short-lived states, together with results from beta-NMR, TDPAD, recoil-in-vacuum and tilted-foils techniques, have supplied key electromagnetic observables that constrain shell-model calculations, reveal the nature of weakly collective nuclei, and map the electromagnetic properties inside islands of inversion and around doubly magic cores such as 68-78Ni and 132Sn.

What carries the argument

The transient-field method, which records the spin precession of nuclei traversing a polarized ferromagnetic layer and thereby yields g-factors of states with lifetimes down to a few picoseconds.

If this is right

  • Transient-field g-factor measurements enable direct, quantitative comparisons with large-basis shell-model wave functions for nuclei near closed shells.
  • The same data distinguish between different pictures of emerging collectivity away from closed shells and give electromagnetic properties of odd-A rotors.
  • High-spin studies using the same methods have characterized yrast and K isomers, superdeformed bands, and magnetic, anti-magnetic and chiral rotation.
  • In neutron-rich nuclei the moments illuminate the structure of the N=20, N=28 and N=40 islands of inversion and the regions around 68-78Ni and 132Sn.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same methods to nuclei produced at next-generation rare-isotope facilities would test whether the structural patterns observed near the current islands of inversion persist at still larger neutron excess.
  • Systematic discrepancies between measured moments and shell-model predictions in any one mass region could indicate where effective interactions need adjustment before they are applied to heavier systems.
  • Because the methods are largely model-independent, the accumulated data set could serve as a benchmark for ab-initio approaches once those calculations reach the same mass and spin ranges.

Load-bearing premise

The body of literature selected for review accurately and comprehensively represents the main developments in the field over the thirty-year period.

What would settle it

A new, independent compilation of all nuclear-moment results published in the same thirty-year window that finds systematic omissions or contradictory interpretations in the regions of the islands of inversion would show the assessment does not capture the actual state of knowledge.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00900 by Andrew E.Stuchbery, Dimiter L. Balabanski, Georgi Georgiev, Hideki Ueno.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows that irrespective of whether a Boltz￾mann or uniform initial distribution is chosen, for Na￾like ions three low-lying atomic states, 3s1/2 (0), 3p1/2 (1) and 3d5/2 (4), where the numbers in parentheses are the state labels in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p103_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIGURE 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p111_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIGURE 15. View of BareBall with 55 CsI(Tl) photodiode d tors arranged in rings around the beam axis. The figure is taken from Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p111_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Compilation of measured es [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p131_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nuclear moment studies carried out with spin-precession methods at and after the turn of the millennium are critically assessed. A period of about 30 years is covered, during which much of} the focus of nuclear structure research shifted from high-spin physics to studies of neutron-rich exotic nuclei. The formalism for the extraction of nuclear moments is described. The $\beta$-nuclear magnetic resonance/nuclear quadrupole resonance ($\beta$-NMR/NQR), the time-dependent perturbed angular distribution (TDPAD), the transient field, the recoil-in-vacuum (RIV), and the tilted-foils methods for measurements of nuclear magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole moments are described in detail, as well as the requirements for their application in studies of exotic nuclei. The impact of nuclear-moment measurements on the understanding of key topics of nuclear structure research is discussed. {Key results on short-lived states, mainly from transient-field measurements, are reviewed. Included are comparisons with large-basis shell model calculations, discussions on the nature of weakly-collective nuclei, insights into emerging collectivity away from closed shells, and electromagnetic properties of odd-$A$ rotors.} In the field of high-spin physics, research related to high-spin yrast and $\mathrm{K}$ isomers, superdeformation, magnetic, anti-magnetic, and chiral rotation is covered. In neutron-rich exotic nuclei, studies related to the $\mathrm{N=20}$, $\mathrm{N=28}$ and $\mathrm{N=40}$ ``islands of inversion'', the structure of nuclei around $^{68-78}$Ni and $^{132}$Sn, and in the $A \sim 100$ mass region are discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a critical review of nuclear electromagnetic moment measurements performed with spin-precession techniques over approximately 30 years. It describes the underlying formalism, details the β-NMR/NQR, TDPAD, transient-field, recoil-in-vacuum and tilted-foils methods together with their applicability to exotic nuclei, and surveys the impact of the resulting data on nuclear-structure topics including transient-field results on short-lived states, shell-model comparisons, islands of inversion (N=20, 28, 40), high-spin yrast and K isomers, superdeformation, and the structure of nuclei near 68-78Ni and 132Sn.

Significance. If the literature selection and summaries are representative, the review supplies a coherent synthesis of how moment measurements have informed key questions in nuclear structure, particularly the emergence of collectivity away from closed shells and the electromagnetic properties of weakly collective and odd-A systems. The explicit discussion of experimental requirements for short-lived exotic nuclei is a practical contribution that can guide future work.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the text contains apparent LaTeX artifacts (“much of} the focus” and an extraneous “{” before “Key results”) that should be removed prior to publication.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the manuscript and the recommendation to accept. The review is appreciated for recognizing the synthesis of spin-precession methods and their impact on nuclear structure studies.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no internal derivation chain

full rationale

This is a review article that critically assesses ~30 years of nuclear-moment measurements using spin-precession methods, describes existing formalisms (β-NMR/NQR, TDPAD, transient field, RIV, tilted-foils), and discusses their impact on nuclear structure topics via citations to prior literature. No new predictions, first-principles derivations, or parameter fits are introduced whose outputs reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. The load-bearing content is a curated narrative of external results; the sole assumption (representativeness of selected literature) is external to any internal chain and does not trigger any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the paper reviews established experimental methods and prior results in nuclear physics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5837 in / 1017 out tokens · 34945 ms · 2026-07-02T01:44:03.472930+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

292 extracted references · 203 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Oxford Science Publications

    Castel, B., Towner, I.S.: Modern Theories of Nuclear Moments. Oxford Science Publications. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1990). https://books.google.fr/books?id=os8XAAAAIAAJ

    1990

  2. [2]

    In: CERNY, J

    Recknagel, E.: VII.C - Magnetic Moments of Excited States. In: CERNY, J. (ed.) Nuclear Spectroscopy and Reactions, Part C. Pure and Applied Physics, vol. 40, pp. 93–141. Elsevier, Orlando, FL (1974). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-165203-6.50008-8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780121652036500088

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-165203-6.50008-8 1974

  3. [3]

    Blin-Stoyle, R.J.: The Magnetic Moments of Spin 1/2 Nuclei. Proc. Phys- ical Society. Section A66(12), 1158–1161 (1953). https://doi.org/10. 1088/0370-1298/66/12/312

    1953

  4. [4]

    John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ (1953)

    Ramsey, N.F.: Nuclear Moments. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ (1953)

    1953

  5. [5]

    Academic Press, New York (1958)

    Kopfermann, H.: Nuclear Moments. Academic Press, New York (1958)

    1958

  6. [6]

    Topics in Current Physics

    Christiansen, J.: Hyperfine Interactions of Radioactive Nuclei. Topics in Current Physics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (1983). https://books.google.com.au/books?id=rWcsAAAAYAAJ

    1983

  7. [7]

    Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics49(1), 91–154 (2002)

    Speidel, K.-H., Kenn, O., Nowacki, F.: Magnetic moments and nuclear structure. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics49(1), 91–154 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6410(02)00144-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0146-6410(02)00144-8 2002

  8. [8]

    Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics34(9), 321 (2007) Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 218 CONTENTS

    Benczer-Koller, N., Kumbartzki, G.J.: Magnetic moments of short-lived excited nuclear states: measurements and challenges. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics34(9), 321 (2007) Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 218 CONTENTS

    2007

  9. [9]

    Reports on Progress in Physics66(4), 633 (2003)

    Neyens, G.: Nuclear magnetic and quadrupole moments for nuclear struc- ture research on exotic nuclei. Reports on Progress in Physics66(4), 633 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/66/4/205

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/66/4/205 2003

  10. [10]

    In: Bock, R

    Goldring, G.: Hyperfine Interactions in Isoated Ions. In: Bock, R. (ed.) Heavy Ion Collisions vol. 3, p. 483. North Holland, Amsterdam (1982)

    1982

  11. [11]

    in: ”Treaties on Heavy-Ion Science”, vol

    Goldring, G., Hass, M.: Magnetic Moments of Short-Lived Nuclear Levels. in: ”Treaties on Heavy-Ion Science”, vol. 3, p. 539. Ed: D. Allan Bromley, Plenum Press, New York (1985)

    1985

  12. [12]

    Berry, H.G., Hass, M.: Beam-foil spectroscopy. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 32, 1–34 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ns.32.120182.000245

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.32.120182.000245 1982

  13. [13]

    (eds.) Nuclear Moments, pp

    Neugart, R., Neyens, G.: In: Al-Khalili, J., Roeckl, E. (eds.) Nuclear Moments, pp. 135–189. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi. org/10.1007/3-540-33787-3 4

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-33787-3 2006

  14. [14]

    (ed.) Nuclear Radii and Moments of Unstable Isotopes, pp

    Otten, E.W.: In: Bromley, D.A. (ed.) Nuclear Radii and Moments of Unstable Isotopes, pp. 517–638. Springer, Boston, MA (1989)

    1989

  15. [15]

    Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 129, 104005 (2023)

    Yang, X.F., Wang, S.J., Wilkins, S.G., Ruiz, R.F.G.: Laser spectroscopy for the study of exotic nuclei. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 129, 104005 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.104005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.104005 2023

  16. [16]

    The Euro- pean Physical JournalA 60, 20 (2024)

    Koszor´ us, A., de Groote, R.P., Cheal, B., Campbell, P., Moore, I.D.: Nuclear structure studies by collinear laser spectroscopy. The Euro- pean Physical JournalA 60, 20 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/ s10050-024-01230-9

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/ 2024

  17. [17]

    The European Physical Journal Special Topics233, 1133–1149 (2024)

    Koszor´ us, A., Cheal, B.: Laser spectroscopy of isomers. The European Physical Journal Special Topics233, 1133–1149 (2024). https://doi.org/ 10.1140/epjs/s11734-024-01130-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-024-01130-5 2024

  18. [18]

    Brown, B.A., Chung, W., Wildenthal, B.H.: Electromagnetic multipole moments of ground states of stable odd-mass nuclei in the sd shell. Phys. Rev. C22, 774–786 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.22.774

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.22.774 1980

  19. [19]

    de Groote, R.P., Kujanp¨ a¨ a, S., Koszor´ us, A., Li, J.G., Moore, I.D.: Magnetic octupole moment of 173Yb using collinear laser spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A103, 032826 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA. 103.032826

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva 2021

  20. [20]

    Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables159, 101672 (2024)

    Bofos, S., Mertzimekis, T.J.: Revisiting the nuclear magnetic octupole moment. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables159, 101672 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2024.101672 Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template CONTENTS 219

    work page doi:10.1016/j.adt.2024.101672 2024

  21. [21]

    Naturwissenschaften12, 741–743 (1924)

    Pauli, W.: Zur Frage der theoretischen Deutung der Satelliten einiger Spektrallinien und ihrer Beeinflussung durch magnetische Felder. Naturwissenschaften12, 741–743 (1924). https://doi.org/10. 1007/BF01504828

    1924

  22. [22]

    Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei106, 358–361 (1937)

    Schmidt, T.: ¨Uber die magnetischen Momente der Atomkerne. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei106, 358–361 (1937). https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF01338744

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01338744 1937

  23. [23]

    (eds.) Spins and Electromagnetic Moments of Nuclei, pp

    de Groote, R.P., Neyens, G.: In: Tanihata, I., Toki, H., Kajino, T. (eds.) Spins and Electromagnetic Moments of Nuclei, pp. 1–36. Springer, Singapore (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8818-1 42-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-15-8818-1 2020

  24. [24]

    Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables7(5), 495–564 (1970)

    L¨ obner, K.E.G., Vetter, M., H¨ onig, V.: Nuclear intrinsic quadrupole moments and deformation parameters. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables7(5), 495–564 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-640X(18) 30059-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0092-640x(18 1970

  25. [25]

    Physics Letters B202(1), 15–20 (1988)

    Sagawa, H., Arima, A.: Static and dynamic quadrupole moments of high- spin isomers in the Pb-region. Physics Letters B202(1), 15–20 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(88)90845-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90845-3 1988

  26. [26]

    Christiansen, J., Mahnke, H.-E., Recknagel, E., Riegel, D., Schatz, G., Weyer, G., Witthuhn, W.: Stroboscopic Observation of Nuclear Larmor Precession. Phys. Rev. C1, 613–618 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.1.613

    1970

  27. [27]

    (eds.): Low-Temperature Nuclear Orientation

    Postma, H., Stone, N.J. (eds.): Low-Temperature Nuclear Orientation. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1986)

    1986

  28. [28]

    Bohr, A., Mottelson, B.R.: Nuclear Structure Volume II Nuclear Defor- mations vol. II. Addison-Wesley/W A Benjamin, Inc, Boston, MA (1975)

    1975

  29. [29]

    Mayer, M.G.: On Closed Shells in Nuclei. Phys. Rev.74, 235–239 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.74.235

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.74.235 1948

  30. [30]

    Arima, A., Horie, H.: Configuration Mixing and Magnetic Moments of Odd Nuclei. Prog. Theor. Phys.12(5), 623–641 (1954). https://doi.org/ 10.1143/PTP.12.623

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.12.623 1954

  31. [31]

    Physics Reports155(5), 263–377 (1987)

    Towner, I.S.: Quenching of spin matrix elements in nuclei. Physics Reports155(5), 263–377 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(87) 90138-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(87 1987

  32. [32]

    Arima, A., Shimizu, K., Bentz, W., Hyuga, H.: Nuclear Magnetic Properties and Gamow-Teller Transitions. Adv. Nucl. Phys.18, 1–106 Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 220 CONTENTS (1987)

    2021

  33. [33]

    Richter, W.A., Mkhize, S., Brown, B.A.:sd-shell observables for the USDA and USDB Hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. C78, 064302 (2008). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.064302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.78.064302 2008

  34. [34]

    Brown, B.A., Wildenthal, B.H.: Empirically optimum M1 operator for sd-shell nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A474(2), 290–306 (1987). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0375-9474(87)90619-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(87)90619-1 1987

  35. [35]

    Nuclear Physics A183(2), 289–297 (1972)

    Maier, K.H., Nakai, K., Leigh, J.R., Diamond, R.M., Stephens, F.S.: Effective single-particle magnetic moments around 208Pb. Nuclear Physics A183(2), 289–297 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0375-9474(72)90660-4

    1972

  36. [36]

    Gysbers, P., Hagen, G., Holt, J.D., Jansen, G.R., Morris, P. T. D. Navr´ atil, Papenbrock, T., Quaglioni, S., Schwenk, A., Stroberg, S.R., Wendt, K.A.: Discrepancy between experimental and theoreticalβ- decay rates resolved from first principles. Nature Physics15(5), 428–431 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7 2019

  37. [37]

    Nature607, 260–265 (2022)

    Vernon, A.R., Garcia Ruiz, R.F., Miyagi, T., Binnersley, C.L., Billowes, J., Bissell, M.L., Bonnard, J., Cocolios, T.E., Dobaczewski, J., Farooq- Smith, G.J., Flanagan, K.T., Georgiev, G., Gins, W., de Groote, R.P., Heinke, R., Holt, J.D., Hustings, J., Koszor´ us, A., Leimbach, D., Lynch, K.M., Neyens, G., Stroberg, S.R., Wilkins, S.G., Yang, X.F., Yorda...

    2022

  38. [38]

    Arima, A., Horie, H.: Configuration Mixing and Magnetic Moments of Nuclei. Prog. Theor. Phys.11(4-5), 509–511 (1954). https://doi.org/10. 1143/PTP.11.509

    1954

  39. [39]

    Noya, H., Arima, A., Horie, H.: Nuclear Moments and Configuration Mixing. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.8, 33–112 (1958). https://doi.org/10. 1143/PTPS.8.33

    1958

  40. [40]

    North- Holland Publ

    Morinaga, H., Yamazaki, T.: In-beam Gamma-ray Spectroscopy. North- Holland Publ. Co, Amsterdam (1976)

    1976

  41. [41]

    Nagamiya, S.: Summary of magnetic moments of high-spin states in the Pb region. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. Suppl.34, 230 (1973)

    1973

  42. [42]

    Yamazaki, Y., Hashimoto, O., Ikezoe, H., Nagamiya, S., Nakai, K., Yamazaki, T.: Blocking Effect of theM1 Core Polarization Studied from thegFactor of the 8 + State in 214Ra. Phys. Rev. Lett.33, 1614–1617 Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template CONTENTS 221 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1614

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.33.1614 2021

  43. [43]

    Nuclear Physics A555(2), 355–368 (1993)

    Stuchbery, A.E., Byrne, A.P., Dracoulis, G.D., Fabricius, B., Kib´ edi, T.: Multiparticle-octupole coupling and magnetic moments ofh n 9/2 isomers in N = 126 isotones. Nuclear Physics A555(2), 355–368 (1993). https: //doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(93)90291-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(93)90291-5 1993

  44. [44]

    Ueno, H., Asahi, K., Izumi, H., Nagata, K., Ogawa, H., Yoshimi, A., Sato, H., Adachi, M., Hori, Y., Mochinaga, K., Okuno, H., Aoi, N., Ishihara, M., Yoshida, A., Liu, G., Kubo, T., Fukunishi, N., Shimoda, T., Miyatake, H., Sasaki, M., Shirakura, T., Takahashi, N., Mitsuoka, S., Schmidt-Ott, W.-D.: Magnetic moments of 17N and 17B. Phys. Rev. C 53, 2142–215...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.53.2142 1996

  45. [45]

    Villars, F.: The magnetic exchange moments for 3H and 3He. Helv. Phys. Acta20, 476 (1947). https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-111814

    work page doi:10.5169/seals-111814 1947

  46. [46]

    Miyazawa, H.: Deviations of Nuclear Magnetic Moments from the Schmidt Lines. Prog. Theor. Phys.6(5), 801–814 (1951). https://doi. org/10.1143/ptp/6.5.801

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp/6.5.801 1951

  47. [47]

    Yamazaki, T., Nomura, T., Nagamiya, S., Katou, T.: Anomalous orbital magnetism of proton deduced from the magnetic moment of the 11 − state of 210Po. Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 547–550 (1970). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.25.547

    1970

  48. [48]

    Nagamiya, S., Yamazaki, T.: Evidence for anomalousg l factors of the nucleons and the mesonic-exchange effect. Phys. Rev. C4, 1961–1964 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.4.1961

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.4.1961 1961

  49. [49]

    Ichimura, M., Yazaki, K.: The magnetic moments of nuclei with a closed shell plus or minus one nucleon. Nucl. Phys.63(3), 401–424 (1965). https: //doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(65)90472-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0029-5582(65)90472-4 1965

  50. [50]

    Shimizu, K., Ichimura, M., A., A.: Magnetic moments and GT-typeβ- decay matrix elements in nuclei with a LS doubly closed shell plus or minus one nucleon. Nucl. Phys. A226(2), 282–318 (1974). https://doi. org/10.1016/0375-9474(74)90407-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(74)90407-2 1974

  51. [51]

    Towner, I.S., Khanna, F.C.: Corrections to the single-particle M1 and Gamow−Teller matrix elements. Nucl. Phys. A399(2), 334–364 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(83)90252-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(83)90252-x 1983

  52. [52]

    Hyuga, H., Arima, A., Shimizu, K.: Exchange magnetic moments. Nucl. Phys. A336(3), 363–406 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(80) 90216-X Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 222 CONTENTS

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(80 1980

  53. [53]

    Wildenthal, B.H.: Empirical strengths of spin operators in nuclei. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.11, 5–51 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0146-6410(84)90011-5

    1984

  54. [54]

    Pudliner, B.S., Pandharipande, V.R., Carlson, J., Pieper, S.C., Wiringa, R.B.: Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of nuclei withA≤7. Phys. Rev. C56, 1720–1750 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.56. 1720

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.56 1997

  55. [55]

    Wiringa, R.B., Pieper, S.C., Carlson, J., Pandharipande, V.R.: Quantum monte carlo calculations of A = 8 nuclei. Phys. Rev. C62, 014001 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.62.014001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.62.014001 2000

  56. [56]

    Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W., Meißner, U.-G.: Modern theory of nuclear forces. Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1773–1825 (2009). https://doi.org/ 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1773

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1773 2009

  57. [58]

    Wiringa, R.B., Stoks, V.G.J., Schiavilla, R.: Accurate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge-independence breaking. Phys. Rev. C51, 38–51 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.51.38

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.51.38 1995

  58. [59]

    Pieper, S.C., Pandharipande, V.R., Wiringa, R.B., Carlson, J.: Realistic models of pion-exchange three-nucleon interactions. Phys. Rev. C64, 014001 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.64.014001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.64.014001 2001

  59. [60]

    AIP Conf

    Pieper, S.C.: The Illinois Extension to the Fujita-Miyazawa Three- Nucleon Force. AIP Conf. Proc.1011, 143 (2008)

    2008

  60. [61]

    Marcucci, L.E., Pervin, M., Pieper, S.C., Schiavilla, R., Wiringa, R.B.: Quantum monte carlo calculations of magnetic moments and M1 transi- tions in A⩽7 nuclei including meson-exchange currents. Phys. Rev. C 78, 065501 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.065501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.78.065501 2008

  61. [62]

    Pastore, S., Pieper, S.C., Schiavilla, R., Wiringa, R.B.: Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of electromagnetic moments and transitions inA≤ 9 nuclei with meson-exchange currents derived from chiral effective field theory. Phys. Rev. C87, 035503 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.87.035503

    2013

  62. [63]

    Miyagi, T., Cao, X., Seutin, R., Bacca, S., Ruiz, R.F.G., Hebeler, K., Holt, J.D., Schwenk, A.: Impact of two-body currents on magnetic dipole moments of nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 232503 (2024). https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.232503 Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template CONTENTS 223

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.232503 2024

  63. [64]

    Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics49(11), 11–01 (2022)

    Sassarini, P.L., Dobaczewski, J., Bonnard, J., Ruiz, R.F.G.: Nuclear DFT analysis of electromagnetic moments in odd near doubly magic nuclei. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics49(11), 11–01 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ac900a

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac900a 2022

  64. [65]

    Physics Letters B 847, 138268 (2023)

    Gray, T.J., Stuchbery, A.E., Dobaczewski, J., Blazhev, A., Alsham- mari, H.A., Bignell, L.J., Bonnard, J., Coombes, B.J., Dowie, J.T.H., Gerathy, M.S.M., Kib´ edi, T., Lane, G.J., McCormick, B.P., Mitchell, A.J., Nicholls, C., Pope, J.G., Reinhard, P.-G., Spinks, N.J., Zhong, Y.: Shape polarization in the tin isotopes near N = 60 from precisiong- factor m...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138268 2023

  65. [66]

    Physics Letters B843, 138014 (2023)

    Bonnard, J., Dobaczewski, J., Danneaux, G., Kortelainen, M.: Nuclear DFT electromagnetic moments in heavy deformed open-shell odd nuclei. Physics Letters B843, 138014 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.physletb.2023.138014

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [67]

    Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics (2025)

    Wibowo, H., Backes, B.C., Dobaczewski, J.J., de Groote, R.P., Nag- pal, A., S´ anchez-Fern´ andez, A., Sun, X., Wood, J.L.: Electromagnetic moments in the Sn−Gd region determined within nuclear DFT. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics (2025)

    2025

  67. [68]

    https:// arxiv.org/abs/2503.15738

    Wibowo, H., Backes, B.C., Dobaczewski, J., de Groote, R.P., Nagpal, A., S´ anchez-Fern´ andez, A., Sun, X., Wood, J.L.: Electromagnetic moments in the Sn-Gd region determined within nuclear DFT (2025). https:// arxiv.org/abs/2503.15738

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [69]

    Dobaczewski, J., Stuchbery, A.E., Danneaux, G., Nagpal, A., Sassarini, P.L., Wibowo, H.: Electromagnetic moments of ground and excited states calculated in heavy odd-nopen-shell nuclei. Phys. Rev. C113, 024306 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1103/4q99-rv67

    work page doi:10.1103/4q99-rv67 2026

  69. [70]

    Electromagnetic moments of ground and excited states calculated in heavy odd-Nopen-shell nuclei

    Dobaczewski, J., Stuchbery, A.E., Danneaux, G., Nagpal, A., Sassarini, P.L., Wibowo, H.: Addendum to “Electromagnetic moments of ground and excited states calculated in heavy odd-Nopen-shell nuclei”. Phys. Rev. C113, 044312 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1103/nznj-xmw6

    work page doi:10.1103/nznj-xmw6 2026

  70. [71]

    Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science (2026)

    Dobaczewski, J., Backes, B.C., de Groote, R.P., Restrepo-Giraldo, A., Sun, X., Wibowo, H.: Electromagnetic and exotic moments in nuclear DFT. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science (2026). To be published

    2026

  71. [72]

    North Holland, Amster- dam (1987) Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 224 CONTENTS

    Eisenberg, J.M., Greiner, W.: Nuclear Models. North Holland, Amster- dam (1987) Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 224 CONTENTS

    1987

  72. [73]

    Physics Letters B107(4), 249–252 (1981)

    Sambataro, M., Dieperink, A.E.L.:g-factors in the neutron-proton inter- acting boson approximation. Physics Letters B107(4), 249–252 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(81)90822-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90822-4 1981

  73. [74]

    Nuclear Physics A423(2), 333–349 (1984)

    Sambataro, M., Scholten, O., Dieperink, A.E.L., Piccitto, G.: On magnetic dipole properties in the neutron-proton IBA model. Nuclear Physics A423(2), 333–349 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0375-9474(84)90593-1

    1984

  74. [75]

    Nuclear Physics A314(1), 27–36 (1979)

    Bengtsson, R., Frauendorf, S.: An interpretation of backbending in terms of the crossing of the ground state band with an aligned two-quasiparticle band. Nuclear Physics A314(1), 27–36 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0375-9474(79)90552-9

    1979

  75. [76]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Ragnarsson, I., Nilsson, S.G.: Shapes and Shells in Nuclear Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    1995

  76. [77]

    Physica Scripta93(4), 043003 (2018)

    Frauendorf, S.: Beyond the unified model. Physica Scripta93(4), 043003 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/aaa2e9

    work page doi:10.1088/1402-4896/aaa2e9 2018

  77. [78]

    Springer, New York, NY (2004)

    Ring, P., Schuck, P.: The Nuclear Many-body Problem. Springer, New York, NY (2004)

    2004

  78. [79]

    de-Shalit, A.: Core Excitations in Nondeformed, Odd-A, Nuclei. Phys. Rev.122, 1530–1536 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.122. 1530

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.122 1961

  79. [80]

    Bohr, A. Mat . Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk.26(16) (1952)

    1952

  80. [81]

    Bohr, A., Mottelson, B. Mat . Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk.27(16) (1953)

    1953

Showing first 80 references.