pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01075 · v2 · pith:F27HJD2Gnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Shedding light on the nature of φ(2170) with the parton and hadron cascade model PACIAE

Jian Cao , Wen-Chao Zhang , Bo Feng , Ya-Hui Hou , An-Ke Lei , Zhi-Lei She , Hua Zheng , Li-Lin Zhu
show 3 more authors
Dai-Mei Zhou Yu-Liang Yan Ben-Hao Sa
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 20:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords phi(2170)strangeoniumhybrid mesontetraquarkmolecular statecoalescence modele+e- annihilationPACIAE
0
0 comments X

The pith

φ(2170) interpretations as strangeonium, hybrid or tetraquark states yield different production rates and spectra in e+e- collisions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper simulates production of the φ(2170) particle in electron-positron collisions at 4.95 GeV energy using the PACIAE model. It examines several possible structures for this resonance, including an excited strange quark-antiquark pair, a hybrid with a gluon, tetraquarks with mixed quarks, and bound states of other hadrons. Each candidate is formed in the simulation either from partons or hadrons, and its orbital angular momentum is calculated to check if it matches the 1-- quantum numbers. The resulting yields vary by an order of magnitude depending on the assumed structure, and the rapidity and transverse momentum distributions differ significantly between candidates. These differences are suggested as observables that could identify which structure is correct.

Core claim

Given J^{PC}=1^{--}, φ(2170) can be interpreted as a D-wave s s-bar, a P-wave s s-bar g, a P-wave u u-bar s s-bar / d d-bar s s-bar / ss s-bar s-bar, an S-wave Lambda-bar Lambda, or an S-wave phi K+ K- state. The yields of the D-wave s s-bar, P-wave s s-bar g, u u-bar s s-bar and d d-bar s s-bar states are of order 10^{-4}; those for the S-wave Lambda-bar Lambda and phi K+ K- states are of order 10^{-5}; while the P-wave ss s-bar s-bar yield is of order 10^{-6}. Moreover, significant discrepancies are observed in the rapidity distributions and the pT spectra among the various candidates. These discrepancies could serve as valuable criteria for unraveling the nature of φ(2170).

What carries the argument

PACIAE 4.0 model generating final partonic state and final hadronic state, with dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence for parton-based candidates and recombination for hadron-based candidates, followed by calculation of orbital angular momentum in the rest frame for spectral classification.

If this is right

  • The yield of φ(2170) should be approximately 10^{-4} if it is a D-wave strangeonium or a P-wave tetraquark with two non-strange quarks.
  • If φ(2170) is a P-wave tetraquark with four strange quarks, its yield would be about 10^{-6}, an order of magnitude smaller.
  • Rapidity distributions of the different candidate states show significant differences that experiments could measure.
  • The transverse momentum spectra also differ substantially between interpretations, providing another experimental handle.
  • Data at sqrt(s)=4.95 GeV could therefore rule out some interpretations based on measured yields and shapes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar simulations could be performed for other vector mesons or exotic states to predict distinguishing features.
  • The inclusion of the d d-bar s s-bar configuration is motivated by U(1) anomaly effects, which might have broader implications for production of other mixed-flavor states.
  • If one candidate matches data, it would suggest that the formation mechanism in the model is realistic for that structure.
  • Extending the model to higher energies or different collision systems could test the robustness of these distinctions.

Load-bearing premise

The dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence and hadron recombination correctly form states with the assigned orbital angular momentum L that satisfy J^{PC}=1^{--} for each candidate.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of the φ(2170) yield at sqrt(s)=4.95 GeV that falls outside the range of 10^{-6} to 10^{-4}, or rapidity and pT distributions that do not match any of the predicted shapes for the candidates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01075 by An-Ke Lei, Ben-Hao Sa, Bo Feng, Dai-Mei Zhou, Hua Zheng, Jian Cao, Li-Lin Zhu, Wen-Chao Zhang, Ya-Hui Hou, Yu-Liang Yan, Zhi-Lei She.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Similar as that in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The nature of $\phi(2170)$ remains open. We simulate its production in $e^+e^-$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=4.95$ GeV using PACIAE 4.0, which sequentially generates the final partonic state (FPS) and the final hadronic state (FHS). While previous studies have interpreted $\phi(2170)$ as an $ss\bar{s}\bar{s}$ or a $u\bar{u}s\bar{s}$ state, the $U(1)$ anomaly coupling allows non-strange quarks to couple to a vector $s\bar{s}$ component via soft-gluon interactions. This motivates us to also explore the $d\bar{d}s\bar{s}$ tetraquark configuration. In addition, we consider $\phi(2170)$ as an excited strangeonium state, an $s\bar{s}g$ hybrid state, a $\bar{\Lambda}\Lambda$ bound state, and a $\phi K^+K^-$ resonance state. The strangeonium, hybrid, and tetraquark candidates are formed by coalescing their constituent partons in the FPS using the dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence model. The $\bar{\Lambda}\Lambda$ and $\phi K^+K^-$ states are produced via recombination of their constituent hadrons in the FHS. We calculate the orbital angular momentum quantum number of each candidate in its rest frame and perform spectral classification. Given $J^{PC}=1^{--}$, $\phi(2170)$ can be interpreted as a $D$-wave $s\bar{s}$, a $P$-wave $s\bar{s}g$, a $P$-wave $u\bar{u}s\bar{s}/d\bar{d}s\bar{s}/ss\bar{s}\bar{s}$, an $S$-wave $\bar{\Lambda}\Lambda$, or an $S$-wave $\phi K^+K^-$ state. The yields of the $D$-wave $s\bar{s}$, $P$-wave $s\bar{s}g$, $u\bar{u}s\bar{s}$ and $d\bar{d}s\bar{s}$ states are of order $10^{-4}$; those for the $S$-wave $\bar{\Lambda}\Lambda$ and $\phi K^+K^-$ states are of order $10^{-5}$; while the $P$-wave $ss\bar{s}\bar{s}$ yield is of order $10^{-6}$. Moreover, significant discrepancies are observed in the rapidity distributions and the $p_T$ spectra among the various candidates. These discrepancies could serve as valuable criteria for unraveling the nature of $\phi(2170)$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript simulates φ(2170) production in e⁺e⁻ collisions at √s=4.95 GeV with PACIAE 4.0, generating final partonic (FPS) and hadronic (FHS) states. It forms candidate states for multiple interpretations (D-wave s s-bar, P-wave s s-bar g hybrid, P-wave u u-bar s s-bar / d d-bar s s-bar / s s s-bar s-bar tetraquarks, S-wave Λ-bar Λ, S-wave φ K⁺ K⁻) via dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence in FPS or hadron recombination in FHS. Orbital angular momentum L is computed in the rest frame for spectral classification to match J^{PC}=1^{--}. Yields are reported as O(10^{-4}) for D-wave s s-bar, P-wave hybrid, and u/d tetraquarks; O(10^{-5}) for Λ-bar Λ and φ K⁺ K⁻; O(10^{-6}) for s s s-bar s-bar. Differences in rapidity distributions and p_T spectra are proposed as experimental discriminants.

Significance. If the coalescence and recombination procedures reliably produce states with the assigned L values consistent with J^{PC}=1^{--}, the order-of-magnitude yield differences and the reported discrepancies in rapidity and p_T spectra would offer a concrete phenomenological handle for distinguishing among the listed interpretations of φ(2170). The systematic exploration of strangeonium, hybrid, tetraquark (including the d d-bar s s-bar case motivated by U(1) anomaly), and molecular configurations is a strength of the approach.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section on spectral classification and formation in FPS/FHS] Section on spectral classification and formation in FPS/FHS: The assignment of D-wave, P-wave, or S-wave character (and thus the J^{PC}=1^{--} classification) relies on post-formation calculation of orbital angular momentum L from constituent momenta. The dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence model applies position-momentum cuts but contains no explicit projection onto partial-wave content; no validation is provided that the formed clusters possess the intended L wave-function structure.
  2. [Abstract and results sections] Abstract and results sections: The quoted yields (O(10^{-4})–O(10^{-6})) and the claimed significant discrepancies in rapidity and p_T spectra are presented without statistical or systematic uncertainties, without variation of PACIAE parameters, and without variation of the coalescence phase-space cuts. Because these quantities are direct simulation outputs, the absence of such variations prevents assessment of whether the reported differences are robust enough to serve as distinguishing criteria.
minor comments (1)
  1. The motivation for including the d d-bar s s-bar tetraquark via U(1) anomaly coupling would be strengthened by citing the relevant literature on soft-gluon interactions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work's significance and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Section on spectral classification and formation in FPS/FHS: The assignment of D-wave, P-wave, or S-wave character (and thus the J^{PC}=1^{--} classification) relies on post-formation calculation of orbital angular momentum L from constituent momenta. The dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence model applies position-momentum cuts but contains no explicit projection onto partial-wave content; no validation is provided that the formed clusters possess the intended L wave-function structure.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence applies position-momentum cuts without an explicit partial-wave projection operator. The orbital angular momentum L is computed post-formation in the candidate rest frame solely for spectral classification to identify states consistent with J^{PC}=1^{--}. This is the standard procedure in such cascade models, but we agree it constitutes an approximation rather than a full wave-function validation. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit discussion of this limitation, clarifying that the L assignment provides a necessary consistency check but does not constitute a complete projection onto the desired partial wave. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Abstract and results sections: The quoted yields (O(10^{-4})–O(10^{-6})) and the claimed significant discrepancies in rapidity and p_T spectra are presented without statistical or systematic uncertainties, without variation of PACIAE parameters, and without variation of the coalescence phase-space cuts. Because these quantities are direct simulation outputs, the absence of such variations prevents assessment of whether the reported differences are robust enough to serve as distinguishing criteria.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of uncertainties and parameter variations limits the ability to judge robustness. The reported yields are direct Monte Carlo outputs from a baseline run with fixed PACIAE and coalescence parameters. In the revised manuscript we will (i) quote statistical uncertainties derived from the simulated event sample and (ii) present results from limited variations of the key coalescence phase-space cuts to demonstrate that the order-of-magnitude yield differences and the qualitative features of the rapidity and p_T spectra remain stable. Full systematic scans of all PACIAE parameters lie beyond the scope of the present exploratory study but can be noted as future work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Simulation yields and spectra are direct model outputs, not fitted or self-defined

full rationale

The paper runs PACIAE 4.0 to generate FPS and FHS, forms candidate clusters via the dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence model (or hadron recombination), then computes L from rest-frame momenta and classifies states by the resulting L to match J^{PC}=1^{--}. Yields (10^{-4} to 10^{-6}) and rapidity/p_T discrepancies are computed outputs for each candidate; no parameters are adjusted to φ(2170) data, and no equation reduces a claimed prediction to an input fit or self-citation by construction. Model citations are standard prior work and do not carry the distinction claim. This is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The simulation depends on the PACIAE cascade model whose parameters are taken from prior work, plus coalescence criteria chosen to enforce desired L values; no new entities are postulated beyond the candidate interpretations already discussed in the literature.

free parameters (2)
  • PACIAE model parameters
    Tuned parameters controlling parton and hadron cascades inherited from earlier PACIAE publications.
  • coalescence phase-space cuts
    Dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence parameters used to form the tetraquark, hybrid, and strangeonium candidates.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption PACIAE 4.0 accurately generates the final partonic and hadronic states in e+e- collisions at 4.95 GeV
    Invoked throughout the simulation of FPS and FHS.
  • domain assumption The coalescence model assigns correct orbital angular momentum L to each formed candidate in its rest frame
    Required for the subsequent spectral classification into D-wave, P-wave, S-wave states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6074 in / 1770 out tokens · 33965 ms · 2026-07-03T20:21:58.634644+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The con- stituent mesons of each accepted candidate are subse- quently removed from the list

    is accepted as a φ(2170) candidate. The con- stituent mesons of each accepted candidate are subse- quently removed from the list. The triple-loop process is repeated on the updated list until no mesons remain or no further valid candidates can be formed. The production of φ(2170) candidates with other configurations is per- formed in a similar manner, usin...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Different theoretical interpretations of φ(2170) lead to distinct P and C formulas

    leads to: L = round ( − 1 + √ 1 + 4|l∗|2/ ℏ2 2 ) , (7) where round(X) returns the integer nearest to X. Different theoretical interpretations of φ(2170) lead to distinct P and C formulas. If φ(2170) is interpreted as an excited s¯s state, the parity is P = Ps ·P¯s ·(− 1)L = (− 1)L+1, where L is the total orbital angular momen- tum of the system. For the te...

    work page

  3. [3]

    31 × 10− 4, and 7

    60 × 10− 4, 1. 31 × 10− 4, and 7. 89 × 10− 6 to 1. 61 × 10− 6,

    work page

  4. [4]

    91 × 10− 8, respectively

    21 × 10− 6, and 3 . 91 × 10− 8, respectively. In contrast, theS-wave ¯ΛΛ and φK +K − states show an opposite ten- dency with respect to the lower bound of R0. When the lower limit is decreased from 1.0 fm to 0.7 fm, their yields increase from 6. 58 × 10− 5 and 6. 43 × 10− 5 to 1. 30 × 10− 4 and 1. 46 × 10− 4, respectively. Moreover, further increas- ing t...

    work page

  5. [5]

    trunc(X)

    64 times the total width of φ(2170). Furthermore, we examined the sensitivity of the results to the method used for extracting the orbital angular momentum quantum number L in Eq. ( 7). An alternative procedure based 6 on “trunc(X)”, which discards the fractional part of X, was compared with the default “round( X)” method. Re- placing “round” with “trunc”...

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Amsler and N

    C. Amsler and N. A. T¨ ornqvist, Mesons beyond the naive quark model, Phys. Rep. 389, 61 (2004)

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Klempt and A

    E. Klempt and A. Zaitsev, Glueballs, hybrids, multi- quarks: Experimental facts versus QCD inspired con- cepts, Phys. Rep. 454, 1 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Crede and C

    V. Crede and C. Meyer, The experimental status of glue- balls, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 63, 74 (2009)

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    Brambilla, et al., QCD and strongly coupled gauge theories: challenges and perspectives, Eur

    N. Brambilla, et al., QCD and strongly coupled gauge theories: challenges and perspectives, Eur. Phys. J C 74, 2981 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Gell-Mann, A schematic model of baryons and mesons, Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, A schematic model of baryons and mesons, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964)

    work page 1964

  11. [11]

    Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symme- try and its breaking, CERN Report No

    G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symme- try and its breaking, CERN Report No. CERN-TH-401. 7

    work page

  12. [12]

    Choi et al

    S.-K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of a narrow charmoniumlike state in exclusive B± → K ± π +π − J/ψ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003)

    work page 2003

  13. [13]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, The hid- dencharm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept. 639, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Esposito, A

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Multiquark resonances, Phys. Rept. 668, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    A. Ali, J. S. Lange, and S. Stone, Exotics: heavy pen- taquarks and tetraquarks, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 123 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    R. F. Lebed, E. S. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Heavy- quark QCD exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, and D. Zieminska, Nonstan- dard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015003 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Brambilla et al

    N. Brambilla et al. The XYZ states: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rept. 873, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), A model- independent study of resonant structure in B+ → D+D− K + decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 242001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nature Physics 18, 751–754 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Liu et al

    Z.-Q. Liu et al. (Belle Collaboration), Study of e+e− → π +π − J/ψ and observation of a charged charmoniumlike state at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252002 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of structure in the J/ψ -pair mass spectrum, Sci. Bull. 65, 1983 (2020)

    work page 1983

  24. [24]

    Hayrapetyan et al

    A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), New struc- tures in the J/ψJ/ψ mass spectrum in proton-proton col- lisions at √ s = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 111901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of an excess of dicharmonium events in the four-muon final state with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151902 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, B. Barsbay, and H. Sundu, Fully charmed resonance X(6900) and its beauty counterpart, Nucl. Phys. A 1041, 122768 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    J. Z. Wang, D. Y. Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Pro- ducing fully charm structures in the J/ψ -pair invariant mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 103, 071503 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    M. A. Bedolla, J. Ferretti, C. D. Roberts, and E. San- topinto, Spectrum of fully-heavy tetraquarks from a di- quark+antidiquark perspective, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1004 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Liu, F.-X

    M.-S. Liu, F.-X. Liu, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Fully heavy tetraquark states and their evidences in LHC ob- servations, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076017 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    J. F. Giron and R. F. Lebed, Simple spectrum of c¯cc¯c states in the dynamical diquark model, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of an axial-vector state in the study of the decay ψ (3686) → φηη ′, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 191901 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of a structure in e+e− → φη ′ at √ s from 2.05 to 3.08 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 102, 012008 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Aubert et al

    B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Structure at 2175 MeV in e+e− → φf 0(980) observed via initial-state radiation, Phys. Rev. D 74, 091103(R) (2006)

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    C. P. Shen et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of the φ (1680) and the Y (2175) in e+e− → φπ +π − , Phys. Rev. D 80, 031101(R) (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BES Collaboration), Observation of Y (2175) in J/ψ → ηφf 0(980), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 102003 (2008)

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of J/ψ → ηφπ +π − at BESIII, Phys. Rev. D 91, 052017 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of e+e− → ηY (2175) at center-of-mass energies above 3.7 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 99, 012014 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of the process e+e− → φη at center-of-mass energies between 2.00 and 3.08 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 104, 032007 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Measurement of e+e− → φπ +π − cross sections at center-of-mass ener- gies from 2.00 to 3.08 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 108, 032011 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Aubert et al

    B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collaboration), The e+e− → K +K − π +π − ,K +K − π 0π 0, and K +K − K +K − cross sec- tions measured with initial-state radiation, Phys. Rev. D 76, 012008 (2007)

    work page 2007

  41. [41]

    J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Cross Sections for the Reactions e+e− → K +K − π +π − , K +K − π 0π 0, andK +K − K +K − measured using initial-state radiation events, Phys. Rev. D 86, 012008 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    Pang, Excited states of φ meson, Phys

    C.-Q. Pang, Excited states of φ meson, Phys. Rev. D 99, 074015 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Barnes, N

    T. Barnes, N. Black, and P. R. Page, Strong decays of strange quarkonia, Phys. Rev. D 68, 054014 (2003)

    work page 2003

  44. [44]

    S. S. Afonin and I. V. Pusenkov, Universal description of radially excited heavy and light vector mesons, Phys. Rev. D 90, 094020 (2014)

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    Li, L.-C

    Q. Li, L.-C. Gui, M.-S. Liu, Q.-F. L¨ u, and X.-H. Zhong, Mass spectrum and strong decays of strangeonium in a constituent quark model, Chin. Phys. C 45, 023116 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Wang, Z.-F

    X. Wang, Z.-F. Sun, D.-Y. Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Nonstrange partner of strangeonium-like state Y (2175), Phys. Rev. D 85, 074024 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Ding and M.-L

    G.-J. Ding and M.-L. Yan, A candidate for 1 − strangeo- nium hybrid, Phys. Lett. B 650, 390 (2007)

    work page 2007

  48. [48]

    P. R. Page, E. S. Swanson, and A. P. Szczepaniak, Hybrid meson decay phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 59, 034016 (1999)

    work page 1999

  49. [49]

    Li, Z.-R

    S.-H. Li, Z.-R. Huang, W. Chen, and H.-Y. Jin, Revising the mass of light hybrid mesons: NLO QCD sum rules point to φ (2170) as a prime candidate, JHEP 03, 087 (2026)

    work page 2026

  50. [50]

    Wang, Analysis of the Y (2175) as a tetraquark state with QCD sum rules, Nucl

    Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the Y (2175) as a tetraquark state with QCD sum rules, Nucl. Phys. A 791 106 (2007)

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    H.-X. Chen, X. Liu, A. Hosaka, and S.-L. Zhu, The Y (2175) state in the QCD sum rule, Phys. Rev. D 78, 034012 (2008)

    work page 2008

  52. [52]

    Drenska, R

    N.V. Drenska, R. Faccini, and A.D. Polosa, Higher tetraquark particles, Phys. Lett. B 669, 160 (2008)

    work page 2008

  53. [53]

    Ke and X.-Q

    H.-W. Ke and X.-Q. Li, Study of the strong decays of φ (2170) and the future charm-tau factory, Phys. Rev. D 99, 036014 (2019). 8

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    Liu, M.-S

    F.-X. Liu, M.-S. Liu, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Fully strange tetraquark ss¯s¯s spectrum and possible experi- mental evidence, Phys. Rev. D 103, 016016 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, H. Sundu, Nature of the vector resonance Y (2175), Phys. Rev. D 101, 074012 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    L. Zhao, N. Li, S.-L. Zhu, and B.-S. Zou, Meson-exchange model for the Λ ¯Λ interaction, Phys. Rev. D 87, 054034 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    C. Deng, J. Ping, Y. Yang, and F. Wang, Baryonia and near-threshold enhancements, Phys. Rev. D 88, 074007 (2013)

    work page 2013

  58. [58]

    Y. Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, Q. L¨ u, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Selected strong decays of η(2225) and φ (2170) as Λ ¯Λ bound states, Phys. Rev. D 96, 074027 (2017)

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    Martinez Torres, K

    A. Martinez Torres, K. P. Khemchandani, L. S. Geng, M. Napsuciale, and E. Oset, X(2175) as a resonant state of the φK ¯K system, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074031 (2008)

    work page 2008

  60. [60]

    Gomez-Avila, M

    S. Gomez-Avila, M. Napsuciale and E. Oset, φK +K − production in electron-positron annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 79, 034018 (2009)

    work page 2009

  61. [61]

    She, Y.-L

    A.-K Lei, Z.-L. She, Y.-L. Yan, D.-M. Zhou, L. Zheng, W.-C. Zhang, H. Zheng, L. V. Bravina, E. E. Zabrodin, and B.-H. Sa, A brief introduction to PACIAE 4.0, Com- put. Phys. Commun., 310, 109520 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Y.-L. Yan, G. Chen, X.-M. Li, D.-M. Zhou, M.-J. Wang, S.-Y. Hu, L. Ye, and B.-H. Sa, Predictions for the pro- duction of light nuclei in pp collisions at √ s = 7 and 14 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 85, 024907 (2012)

    work page 2012

  63. [63]

    B. R. Martin and G. Shaw, Particle Physics (Third edi- tion), (John Wiley and Sons Ltd, West Sussex, 2008)

    work page 2008

  64. [64]

    Cao, W.-C

    J. Cao, W.-C. Zhang, J.-P. Zhang, B. Feng, A.-K. Lei, Z.- L. She, H. Zheng, D.-M. Zhou, Y.-L. Yan, B.-H. Sa, Deci- phering the nature of X(2300) with the PACIAE model, Phys. Rev. D 113, L031501 (2026)

    work page 2026

  65. [65]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, J. High Energy Phys. 05, 026 (2006)

    work page 2006

  66. [66]

    B. L. Combridge, J. Kripfganz, and J. Ranft, Hadron pro- duction at large transverse momentum and QCD, Phys. Lett. B 70, 234 (1977)

    work page 1977

  67. [67]

    R. D. Field, Applications of perturbative QCD (Addison - Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, 1989)

    work page 1989

  68. [68]

    Baldini, et al., Total cross section for reactions of high energy particles, (Spring-veslay, Berlin, 1988)

    A. Baldini, et al., Total cross section for reactions of high energy particles, (Spring-veslay, Berlin, 1988)

    work page 1988

  69. [69]

    Lei, Y.-L

    A.-K. Lei, Y.-L. Yan, D.-M. Zhou, Z.-L. She, L. Zheng, G.-C. Yong, X.-M. Li, G. Chen, X. Cai, and B.-H. Sa, Introduction to the parton and hadron cascade model PACIAE 3.0, Phys. Rev. C 108, 064909 (2023)

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    Xu, Z.-L

    H.-G. Xu, Z.-L. She, D.-M. Zhou, L. Zheng, X.-L. Kang, G. Cheng, and B.-H. Sa, Investigation of exotic state X(3872) in pp collisions at √ s = 7, 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 784 (2021)

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    Wu, Z.-L

    C.-T. Wu, Z.-L. She, X.-Y. Peng, X.-L. Kang, H.-G. Xu, D.-M. Zhou, G. Chen, and B.-H. Sa, Study on the struc- ture of exotic states χ c1(3872) via beauty-hadron decays in pp collisions at √ s = 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114022 (2023)

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    She, A.-K

    Z.-L. She, A.-K. Lei, Y.-L. Yan, D.-M. Zhou, W.-C. Zhang, H. Zheng, L. Zheng, Y.-L. Xie, G. Chen, and B.-H. Sa, Identifying an X(3872) tetraquark state versus a molecular state by formation time, velocity, and tem- perature in relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 110, 014910 (2024)

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    Zhang, L

    Z. Zhang, L. Zheng, G. Chen, H.-G. Xu, D.-M. Zhou, Y.- L. Yan, and B.-H. Sa, The study of exotic state Z± c (3900) decaying to J/ψπ ± in the pp collisions at √ s= 1.96, 7, and 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 198 (2021)

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    Cao, W.-C

    J. Cao, W.-C. Zhang, Z.-L. She, A.-K. Lei, J.-P. Zhang, H. Zheng, D.-M. Zhou, Y.-L. Yan, Z.-Q. Wang, and B.-H. Sa, Charmonium-like exotic hadron productions in e+e− collisions at the BESIII energy with the PACIAE model, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014033 (2025)

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    Chen, Y.-L

    C.-H. Chen, Y.-L. Xie, H.-G. Xu, Z. Zhang, D.-M. Zhou, Z.-L. She, and G. Chen, Exotic states Pc(4312),Pc(4440), and Pc(4457) in pp collisions at √ s = 7, 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054013 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    H.-G. Xu, G. Chen, Y.-L. Yan, D.-M. Zhou, L. Zheng, Y.-L. Xie, Z.-L. She, and B.-H. Sa, Study on the Ω 0 c states decaying to Ξ + cK − in pp collisions at √ s = 7, 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 102, 054319 (2020)

    work page 2020

  77. [77]

    Wang, Z.-L

    Q. Wang, Z.-L. She, A.-K. Lei, D.-M. Zhou, W.-C. Zhang, H. Zheng, Y.-L. Yan, B.-H. Sa, Investigation of T ∗ cs0(2870)0 in pp collisions at √ s = 7 TeV with the PA- CIAE model, Phys. Lett. B 872, 140068 (2026)

    work page 2026

  78. [78]

    Cao, Z.-L

    J. Cao, Z.-L. She, J.-P. Zhang, J.-H. Shi, Z.-Y. Qin, W.- C. Zhang, H. Zheng, A.-K. Lei, D.-M. Zhou, Y.-L. Yan, and B.-H. Sa, X(2370) glueball-like particle productions in e+e− collisions at the BESIII energy and in pp colli- sions at the LHC energy with the PACIAE model, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054046 (2024)

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    Kubo, Statistical mechanics (North-Holland Publis h- ing Company, Amsterdam, 1965)

    R. Kubo, Statistical mechanics (North-Holland Publis h- ing Company, Amsterdam, 1965)

    work page 1965

  80. [80]

    Stowe, An introduction to thermodynamics and statis - tical mechanics (Cambridge University, Cambridge, Eng- land, 2007)

    K. Stowe, An introduction to thermodynamics and statis - tical mechanics (Cambridge University, Cambridge, Eng- land, 2007)

    work page 2007

Showing first 80 references.