Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 42 references

Phase-selective orbital-charge conversion in $\mathrm{MoTe_2}$

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-03 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read MoTe2 thin films exhibit orbital-charge conversion exclusively in the metallic 1T' phase below a 4.5 nm thickness threshold.

desk verdict The paper shows a clear thickness-driven phase switch in MoTe2 films that turns on an extra transverse voltage in spin pumping only for the 1T' phase, with the orbital assignment coming from DFT agreement rather than a direct experimental separation. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.01623 v1 pith:LWK2QW4O submitted 2026-07-02 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

J. L. Costa , E. Santos , G. R. Gallo , G. Rodrigues-Junior , R. O. Cunha , E. L. T. França , R. Cardias , T. G. Rappoport
show 2 more authors
J. B. S. Mendes A. Azevedo
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords MoTe21T'phase2HorbitalRashba-Edelsteinspinpumpingtransitionorbitronicsthinfilms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper demonstrates that orbitronic response in MoTe2 is controlled by a structural phase that depends on film thickness. Films thinner than about 4.5 nm stabilize in the metallic 1T' phase and produce an extra transverse charge signal under spin pumping, while thicker films enter the semiconducting 2H phase and lack this signal. Raman spectroscopy and scanning tunneling spectroscopy confirm the phase change, and first-principles calculations link the signal specifically to orbital Rashba-Edelstein conversion in the metallic phase. A sympathetic reader cares because the result shows how a simple thickness parameter can turn orbital-charge conversion on or off in a two-dimensional material.

What carries the argument

The orbital Rashba-Edelstein response, which produces a transverse charge current from orbital moments and operates only in the metallic 1T' phase of MoTe2.

What would settle it

Observation of the transverse charge-conversion signal in thick semiconducting 2H-MoTe2 films, or its absence in thin metallic 1T' films, would falsify the phase-selective orbital mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

MoTe2 thin films undergo a thickness-driven structural phase transition at approximately 4.5 nm, stabilizing in the metallic 1T' phase below this threshold and the semiconducting 2H phase above it. Spin-pumping measurements detect an additional transverse charge-conversion signal exclusively in metallic 1T'-MoTe2, in agreement with first-principles calculations that identify a dominant orbital Rashba-Edelstein response as the underlying conversion mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The extra transverse charge-conversion signal arises specifically from the orbital Rashba-Edelstein effect rather than spin-related or other mechanisms, and thickness fully determines which phase is present.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a thickness-driven structural phase transition in RF-sputtered MoTe₂ films at ~4.5 nm, from metallic 1T′ (gapless) below this thickness to semiconducting 2H (finite gap) above it, as confirmed by Raman spectroscopy and scanning tunneling spectroscopy. Spin-pumping experiments detect an additional transverse charge-conversion voltage exclusively in the 1T′ phase; first-principles calculations are invoked to attribute this signal to a dominant orbital Rashba–Edelstein effect rather than conventional spin-charge conversion.

Significance. If the phase assignment and orbital attribution hold after controls, the result would establish a concrete example of phase-selective orbitronics in a TMD, showing that the structural transition can switch on an orbital-charge channel. This would be of interest for orbitronic device concepts that exploit 2D phase engineering.

major comments (2)
  1. [Spin-pumping measurements and interpretation] The central attribution of the extra transverse signal to orbital Rashba–Edelstein conversion (rather than spin-related channels) rests solely on agreement with first-principles calculations. No experimental control is described that would distinguish orbital from spin mechanisms, e.g., via symmetry selection rules, thickness-dependent spin diffusion length, or magnetic-field dependence that would differ for orbital versus spin moments. This directly affects the load-bearing claim that the response is orbital in origin.
  2. [Experimental methods and results] The phase assignment (1T′ below 4.5 nm, 2H above) is used to explain the presence/absence of the signal, yet the manuscript does not report whether the spin-pumping data were acquired on the same films whose Raman/STS phase was verified, nor whether any thickness series shows the signal vanishing exactly at the Raman/STS crossover. This leaves open the possibility that the observed selectivity is not strictly phase-governed.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and text refer to 'first-principles calculations' without stating the exchange-correlation functional, pseudopotentials, or k-mesh convergence criteria used to identify the orbital Rashba–Edelstein response.
  2. No error bars, number of devices, or statistical criteria for the critical thickness (~4.5 nm) or the magnitude of the transverse voltage are provided.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and indicate revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central attribution of the extra transverse signal to orbital Rashba–Edelstein conversion (rather than spin-related channels) rests solely on agreement with first-principles calculations. No experimental control is described that would distinguish orbital from spin mechanisms, e.g., via symmetry selection rules, thickness-dependent spin diffusion length, or magnetic-field dependence that would differ for orbital versus spin moments. This directly affects the load-bearing claim that the response is orbital in origin.

    Authors: We agree that the attribution relies primarily on first-principles calculations identifying a dominant orbital Rashba-Edelstein effect in the 1T' phase, with spin contributions calculated to be negligible. The phase-selective observation (signal present only in metallic 1T' and absent in 2H) provides supporting evidence, as both phases possess strong SOC yet differ structurally. Direct experimental separation of orbital versus spin channels is not reported here and would require additional controls not performed in this work. We have added a discussion paragraph on this limitation and possible future tests. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The phase assignment (1T′ below 4.5 nm, 2H above) is used to explain the presence/absence of the signal, yet the manuscript does not report whether the spin-pumping data were acquired on the same films whose Raman/STS phase was verified, nor whether any thickness series shows the signal vanishing exactly at the Raman/STS crossover. This leaves open the possibility that the observed selectivity is not strictly phase-governed.

    Authors: All spin-pumping, Raman, and STS measurements were performed on films from the same deposition batches. A full thickness series was acquired, with the transverse charge-conversion signal vanishing at the ~4.5 nm point matching the Raman/STS crossover. We have revised the methods and results sections to explicitly state this and added a supplementary figure showing the thickness dependence aligned with the structural transition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: experimental phase assignment and signal detection are independent of the orbital mechanism attribution

full rationale

The provided text shows the phase crossover established by Raman and STS (independent structural/electronic probes), with the transverse signal observed only in the 1T' phase via spin-pumping. The orbital Rashba-Edelstein attribution is stated as agreement with separate first-principles calculations; no equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains are quoted that would reduce the claim to its inputs by construction. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular paper.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no information on free parameters, axioms or invented entities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phase-selective orbital-charge conversion in $\mathrm{MoTe_2}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LWK2QW4O

@misc{pith2026260701623,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phase-selective orbital-charge conversion in $\mathrmMoTe_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LWK2QW4O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.01623}
}
abstract

Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have emerged as promising materials for spin--orbitronics owing to their strong spin--orbit coupling and rich electronic phases. However, their orbital transport properties remain largely unexplored. Here, we demonstrate that the orbitronic response of $\mathrm{MoTe_2}$ is governed by a thickness-driven structural phase transition. RF-sputtered $\mathrm{MoTe_2}$ thin films exhibit a crossover at a critical thickness of approximately $4.5\,\mathrm{nm}$, stabilizing in the metallic $1T^\prime$ phase below this threshold and in the semiconducting $2H$ phase above it. Raman spectroscopy and scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) confirm the structural and electronic transition, revealing gapless behavior in ultrathin films and a finite band gap in thicker samples. Spin-pumping measurements detect an additional transverse charge-conversion signal exclusively in metallic $1T^\prime$-$\mathrm{MoTe_2}$, in agreement with first-principles calculations that identify a dominant orbital Rashba--Edelstein response as the underlying conversion mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01623 by the authors.

Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V . Morozov, D. Jiang, Y . Zhang, S. V . Dubonos, I. V . Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 306, 666-669 (2004). 12

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov. The Rise of Graphene. Nat. Mater. 6, 183-191 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    M. C. Lemme, D. Akinwande, C. Huyghebaert, and C. Stampfer. 2D materials for future heterogeneous electronics. Nat. Commun. 13, 1392 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    K. P. O’Brien, C. H. Naylor, C. Dorow, K. Maxey, A. V . Penumatcha, A. Vyatskikh, and U. Avci. Process integration and future outlook of 2D transistors. Nat. Commun. 14, 6400 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    X. Wang, C. Liu, Y . Wei, S. Feng, D. Sun, and H. Cheng. Three-dimensional transistors and integration based on low-dimensional materials for the post-Moore’s law era. Mater. Today 63, 170-187 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    J.-H. Kang, H. Shin, K. S. Kim et al. Monolithic 3D integration of 2D materials -based electronics towards ultimate edge computing solutions. Nat. Mater. 22, 1470-1477 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    S. Das, A. Sebastian, E. Pop, C. J. McClellan, A. D. Franklin, T. Grasser, and R. Singh. Transistors based on two-dimensional materials for future integrated circuits. Nat. Electron. 4, 786-799 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    H. Yang, S. O. Valenzuela, M. Chshiev et al. Two-dimensional materials prospects for non- volatile spintronic memories. Nature 606, 663-673 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Z. Jia, M. Zhao, Q. Chen, Y . Tian et al. Spintronic Devices upon 2D Magnetic Materials and Heterojunctions. ACS Nano 19, 9452-9483 (2025)

    2025

  2. [10]

    C. Wang, X. Liu, Z. Yao, W. Hong, and T. Jiao. Recent Advances in MoTe2 Thin Films: Synthesis, Material Properties, and Emerging Applications. ACS Mater. Lett. 8, 76-98 (2026)

    2026

  3. [11]

    T. P. Cysne, L. M. Canonico, M. Costa et al. Orbitronics in two-dimensional materials. npj Spintronics 3, 39 (2025)

    2025

  4. [12]

    Q. Shao, G. Yu, Y .-W. Lan, Y . Shi et al. Strong Rashba-Edelstein Effect-Induced Spin-Orbit Torques in Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenide/Ferromagnet Bilayers. Nano Lett. 16, 7514-7520 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    S. Shi, X. Wang, Y . Zhao, and W. Zhao. Recent progress in strong spin-orbit coupling van der Waals materials and their heterostructures for spintronic applications. Mater. Today Electron. 6, 100060 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Husain, R

    S. Husain, R. Gupta, A. Kumar et al. Emergence of spin -orbit torques in 2D transition metal dichalcogenides: A status update. Appl. Phys. Rev. 7, 041312 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Tamai, Q

    A. Tamai, Q. S. Wu, I. Cucchi, F. Y . Bruno et al. Fermi Arcs and Their Topological Character in the Candidate Type-II Weyl Semimetal MoTe2. Phys. Rev. X 6, 031021 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Jiang, Z

    J. Jiang, Z. K. Liu, Y . Sun, H. F. Yang et al. Signature of type-II Weyl semimetal phase in MoTe2. Nat. Commun. 8, 13973 (2017). 13

    2017

  9. [17]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three - dimensional solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Z. Wang, D. Gresch, A. A. Soluyanov, W. Xie, S. Kushwaha, X. Dai, and B. A. Bernevig. MoTe2: a type-II Weyl topological metal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 056805 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Bihlmayer, P

    G. Bihlmayer, P. Noël, D. V . Vyalikh et al. Rashba-like physics in condensed matter. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 642-659 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    J. E. Abrão, E. Gomes da Silva, G. Rodrigues -Junior, J. B. Mendes, and A. Azevedo. Probing the Spin-Momentum Locking on Rashba Surfaces via Spin Current. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 17, 13162-13169 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    H. C. Koo, S. B. Kim, H. Kim, T. E. Park et al. Rashba Effect in Functional Spintronic Devices. Adv. Mater. 32, 2002117 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Gomes da Silva, J

    E. Gomes da Silva, J. E. Abrão, E. S. Santos et al. Surface-state mediated spin-to-charge conversion in Sb films via bilateral spin current injection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 202402 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    S. Paul, S. Talukdar, R. S. Singh, and S. Saha. Topological phase transition in MoTe 2: A review. Phys. Status Solidi RRL 17, 2200420 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    A. N. Berger, E. Andrade, A. Kerelsky, D. Edelberg, J. Li, Z. Wang, and A. N. Pasupathy. Temperature-driven topological transition in 1T′-MoTe2. npj Quantum Mater. 3, 2 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Saito, Y

    R. Saito, Y . Tatsumi, S. Huang, X. Ling, and M. S. Dresselhaus. Raman spectroscopy of transition metal dichalcogenides. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28, 353002 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Zhang, X

    X. Zhang, X. F. Qiao, W. Shi, J. B. Wu, D. S. Jiang, and P. H. Tan . Phonon and Raman scattering of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides from monolayer, multilayer to bulk material. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2757-2785 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Grzeszczyk, K

    M. Grzeszczyk, K. Gołasa, M. Zinkiewicz, K. Nogajewski, M. R. Molas, M. Potemski, and A. Babiński. Raman scattering of few-layers MoTe2. 2D Mater. 3, 025010 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Y . Wang, J. Xiao, H. Zhu, Y . Li, Y . Alsaid, K. Y . Fong, Y . Zhou, S. Wang, W. Shi, Y . Wang, A. Zettl, E. J. Reed, and X. Zhang. Structural phase transition in monolayer MoTe2 driven by electrostatic doping. Nature 550, 487-491 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Supplemental Material

  22. [30]

    S. S. Awate, K. Xu, J. Liang, B. Katz, R. Muzzio, V . H. Crespi, J. Katoch, and S. K. Fullerton-Shirey. Strain-Induced 2H to 1T′ Phase Transition in Suspended MoTe2 Using Electric Double Layer Gating. ACS Nano 17, 22388-22398 (2023). 14

    2023

  23. [31]

    Azevedo, L

    A. Azevedo, L. H. Vilela-Leão, R. L. Rodríguez-Suárez, A. F. Lacerda Santos, and S. M. Rezende. Spin pumping and anisotropic magnetoresistance voltages in magnetic bilayers: Theory and experiment. Phys. Rev. B 83, 144402 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    Azevedo, L

    A. Azevedo, L. H. Vilela-Leão, R. L. Rodríguez-Suárez, A. B. Oliveira, and S. M. Rezende. dc effect in ferromagnetic resonance: Evidence of the spin -pumping effect? J. Appl. Phys. 97, 10C715 (2005)

    2005

  25. [33]

    Saitoh, M

    E. Saitoh, M. Ueda, H. Miyajima, and G. Tatara . Conversion of spin current into charge current at room temperature: Inverse spin-Hall effect. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 182509 (2006)

    2006

  26. [34]

    K. Ando, S. Takahashi, J. Ieda, Y . Kajiwara, H. Nakayama, T. Yoshino, and E. Saitoh . Inverse spin-Hall effect induced by spin pumping in metallic system. J. Appl. Phys. 109, 103913 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    J. C. Rojas Sánchez, L. Vila, G. Desfonds, S. Gambarelli, J. P. Attané, J. M. De Teresa, C. Magén, and A. Fert. Spin-to-charge conversion using Rashba coupling at the interface between non-magnetic materials. Nat. Commun. 4, 2944 (2013)

    2013

  28. [36]

    E. S. Santos, J. E. Abrão, J. L. Costa, J. G. S. Santos, K. R. Mello, A. S. Vieira, T. C. R. Rocha, T. J. A. Mori, R. O. R. Cunha, J. B. S. Mendes, and A. Azevedo. Bulk and Interface Effects Based on Rashba- like States in Ti and Ru Nanoscale-Thick Films: Implications for Orb...

    2025

  29. [37]

    Santos, J

    E. Santos, J. E. Abrão, D. Go, L. K. De Assis, Y . Mokrousov, J. B. S. Mendes, and A. Azevedo. Inverse orbital torque via spin -orbital intertwined states . Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 014069 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    J. L. Costa, E. Santos, J. B. S. Mendes, and A. Azevedo . Dominance of the orbital Hall effect over spin in transition metal heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 112, 054443 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    J. E. Abrão, E. Santos, J. L. Costa, J. G. S. Santos, J. B. S. Mendes, and A. Azevedo . Anomalous Spin and Orbital Hall Phenomena in Antiferromagnetic Systems . Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 026702 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    P. Wang, Z. Feng, Y . Yang, D. Zhang, Q. Liu, Z. Xu, Z. Jia, Y . Wu, G. Yu, X. Xu, and Y . Jiang. Inverse orbital Hall effect and orbitronic terahertz emission observed in materials with weak spin-orbit coupling. npj Quantum Mater. 8, 28 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Santos, J

    E. Santos, J. L. Costa, R. L. Rodriguez-Suarez, J. B. S. Mendes, and A. Azevedo. Probing orbital currents through inverse orbital Hall and Rashba effects. Commun. Phys. 9, 98 (2026). 15

    2026

  34. [42]

    Santos, J

    E. Santos, J. E. Abrão, A. Vieira, J. Mendes, R. Rodríguez -Suárez, and A. Azevedo . Exploring orbital -charge conversion mediated by interfaces with CuO x through spin -orbital pumping. Phys. Rev. B 109, 014420 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed July 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.