Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 90 references

MKGR: Multimodal Knowledge-Graph Representation Learning for Cold-Start Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-03 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read MKGR combines protein sequence regions with four biomedical knowledge graphs to predict interactions for proteins absent from training data.

desk verdict MKGR combines region-aware sequences with four protein KGs, bridge reconstruction, and pair gating for cold-start PPI and claims outperformance on two datasets, but the abstract supplies almost no experimental details so the gains cannot be assessed yet. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.01627 v1 pith:Y53QEBEW submitted 2026-07-02 cs.LG cs.AI

Wenbo Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords protein-proteininteractioncold-startpredictionknowledgegraphmultimodalrepresentationattentionsequenceencodingbiomedicalnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops MKGR to address cold-start PPI prediction, where candidate proteins lack any observed interaction edges in the training graph. It encodes sequences by attending to structurally informed regions and learns separate embeddings from protein-drug, protein-disease, protein-miRNA, and protein-lncRNA graphs using attention. A bridge reconstruction loss ties the graph modalities together while a gating layer blends sequence and graph signals at the pair level. Experiments on two benchmarks show gains over sequence-only, network, and single-graph baselines under both novel-old and novel-novel splits.

What carries the argument

The MKGR multimodal framework fuses region-aware sequence encoding with graph attention on protein-drug, protein-disease, protein-miRNA and protein-lncRNA associations through bridge reconstruction and pair gating.

What would settle it

An ablation that removes the graph attention branches and bridge loss while retaining sequence encoding and shows no drop in AUC or AUPR on the novel-novel split would falsify the value of the multimodal components.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

MKGR learns cold-start protein representations by pairing region-aware sequence encoders with graph attention encoders on four protein-centered biomedical knowledge graphs, regularized by a bridge reconstruction objective that recovers shared protein-entity links and fused by a pair-level gating module that adaptively weights sequence versus graph evidence for each candidate pair.

Load-bearing premise

The four protein-centered knowledge graphs supply non-redundant signals that improve predictions for proteins with no training interactions beyond what sequence data alone can provide.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Higher accuracy on novel-old and novel-novel cold-start splits across ACC, F1, AUC, AUPR and MCC.
  • Consistent outperformance relative to sequence encoders, topology-based networks and single-modality graph models.
  • Potential to support downstream tasks such as disease mechanism discovery and drug target identification for under-annotated proteins.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If additional protein-centered graphs become available the same bridge reconstruction pattern could absorb them without retraining the sequence branch.
  • The gating module may reveal which modality dominates for particular protein classes, offering a diagnostic for when sequence data is already sufficient.
  • The same architecture could be tested on other sparse biological link prediction problems such as protein-RNA or drug-target interactions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents MKGR, a multimodal framework for cold-start PPI prediction. It integrates a region-aware protein sequence encoder with graph attention networks applied to four protein-centered biomedical KGs (protein-drug, protein-disease, protein-miRNA, protein-lncRNA associations), employs a bridge reconstruction objective to regularize graph learning, and uses a pair-level gating module to combine sequence and graph signals. Experiments on two benchmark datasets under novel-old and novel-novel cold-start splits report consistent outperformance versus sequence, network, and KG baselines on ACC, F1, AUC, AUPR, and MCC.

Significance. If the reported gains hold under rigorous controls, the work demonstrates that auxiliary biomedical KGs can supply non-redundant signal for cold-start proteins beyond sequence alone. This is relevant to functional genomics and drug development, where new proteins frequently appear. The explicit novel-novel setting and direct comparison to sequence baselines provide a clear test of the multimodal contribution.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states outperformance across five metrics but does not mention statistical significance testing, variance across runs, or ablation results; these should be added to the experimental section to support the central empirical claim.
  2. Baseline descriptions (e.g., how sequence-only and network-only models were re-implemented or re-trained on the same splits) are referenced only at a high level; explicit implementation details or citations to exact versions would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive summary and positive assessment of MKGR. The recommendation for minor revision is appreciated; we will incorporate any minor suggestions in the revised manuscript. No major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The provided abstract and description outline a standard multimodal architecture (region-aware sequence encoder, GAT on auxiliary KGs, bridge reconstruction, pair gating) evaluated empirically on benchmark datasets under explicit novel-old and novel-novel cold-start splits. No equations, self-referential objectives, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are present. The central claim reduces to comparative performance metrics against listed baselines, which is directly testable and independent of any internal construction that would force the result by definition. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all details are high-level.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MKGR: Multimodal Knowledge-Graph Representation Learning for Cold-Start Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y53QEBEW

@misc{pith2026260701627,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MKGR: Multimodal Knowledge-Graph Representation Learning for Cold-Start Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y53QEBEW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.01627}
}
read the original abstract

Accurate protein-protein interaction (PPI) prediction is central to functional genomics, disease mechanism discovery, and drug development. A difficult setting arises when candidate interactions include proteins that have no observed PPI edges during training, where models relying on network topology alone often lose useful context. This paper presents \method, a multimodal representation framework for cold-start PPI prediction. \method\ combines region-aware protein sequence encoding with four protein-centered biomedical knowledge graphs, including protein-drug, protein-disease, protein-miRNA, and protein-lncRNA associations. The sequence branch extracts contextual representations from structurally informed sequence regions, while graph attention encoders learn modality-specific protein embeddings from sparse biomedical associations. A bridge reconstruction objective regularizes graph learning by recovering shared protein-entity associations, and a pair-level gating module adaptively integrates sequence and graph evidence for each candidate protein pair. Experiments on two benchmark datasets under novel-old and novel-novel cold-start settings show that \method\ consistently outperforms competitive sequence, network, and knowledge-graph baselines across ACC, F1, AUC, AUPR, and MCC.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01627 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of MKGR. The model combines a region-aware protein sequence branch, multimodal knowledge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Learning spatial structures of proteins improves protein–protein interaction prediction.Briefings in Bioinformatics, 23(2):bbab558, 2022

    Bosheng Song, Xiaoyan Luo, Xiaoli Luo, Yuansheng Liu, Zhangming Niu, and Xiangxiang Zeng. Learning spatial structures of proteins improves protein–protein interaction prediction.Briefings in Bioinformatics, 23(2):bbab558, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Hnsppi: a hybrid computational model combing network and sequence information for predicting protein–protein interaction

    Shijie Xie, Xiaojun Xie, Xin Zhao, Fei Liu, Yiming Wang, Jihui Ping, and Zhiwei Ji. Hnsppi: a hybrid computational model combing network and sequence information for predicting protein–protein interaction. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 24(5):bbad261, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Prediction of protein-protein interactions based on ensemble residual convolutional neural network.Computers in Biology and Medicine, 152:106471, 2023

    Hongli Gao, Cheng Chen, Shuangyi Li, Congjing Wang, Weifeng Zhou, and Bin Yu. Prediction of protein-protein interactions based on ensemble residual convolutional neural network.Computers in Biology and Medicine, 152:106471, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Anti-symmetric framework for balanced learning of protein–protein interactions.Bioinformatics, 40(10):btae603, 2024

    Tao Tang, Tianyang Li, Weizhuo Li, Xiaofeng Cao, Yuansheng Liu, and Xiangxiang Zeng. Anti-symmetric framework for balanced learning of protein–protein interactions.Bioinformatics, 40(10):btae603, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Ju, Guangyu Zhou, Xiangnan Chen, Tianran Zhang, Kai-Wei Chang, Carlo Zaniolo, and Wei Wang

    Muhao Chen, Chelsea J.-T. Ju, Guangyu Zhou, Xiangnan Chen, Tianran Zhang, Kai-Wei Chang, Carlo Zaniolo, and Wei Wang. Multifaceted protein-protein interaction prediction based on siamese residual rcnn.Bioinformatics, 35(14):i305–i314, 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    D-script translates genome to phenome with sequence-based, structure-aware, genome-scale predictions of protein-protein interactions.Cell Systems, 12(10):969–982.e6, 2021

    Samuel Sledzieski, Rohit Singh, Lenore Cowen, and Bonnie Berger. D-script translates genome to phenome with sequence-based, structure-aware, genome-scale predictions of protein-protein interactions.Cell Systems, 12(10):969–982.e6, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Uniprot: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021.Nucleic Acids Research, 49(D1):D480–D489, 2021

    The UniProt Consortium. Uniprot: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021.Nucleic Acids Research, 49(D1):D480–D489, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Lawrence Zitnick, Jerry Ma, and Rob Fergus

    Alexander Rives, Joshua Meier, Tom Sercu, Siddharth Goyal, Zeming Lin, Jason Liu, Demi Guo, Myle Ott, C. Lawrence Zitnick, Jerry Ma, and Rob Fergus. Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15):e2016239118, 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 90 references
  1. [9]

    Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model.Science, 379(6637):1123–1130, 2023

    Zeming Lin, Halil Akin, Roshan Rao, Brian Hie, Zhongkai Zhu, Wenting Lu, Nikita Smetanin, Robert Verkuil, Ori Kabeli, Yaniv Shmueli, et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model.Science, 379(6637):1123–1130, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold.Nature, 596(7873):583–589, 2021

    John Jumper, Richard Evans, Alexander Pritzel, Tim Green, Michael Figurnov, Olaf Ronneberger, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Russ Bates, Augustin Zidek, Anna Potapenko, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold.Nature, 596(7873):583–589, 2021. 6 MKGR for Col...

    2021

  3. [11]

    Kipf and Max Welling

    Thomas N. Kipf and Max Welling. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Hamilton, Rex Ying, and Jure Leskovec

    William L. Hamilton, Rex Ying, and Jure Leskovec. Inductive representation learning on large graphs. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1024–1034, 2017

    2017

  5. [13]

    Graph attention networks

    Petar Velickovic, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Lio, and Yoshua Bengio. Graph attention networks. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    How powerful are graph neural networks? In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019

    Keyulu Xu, Weihua Hu, Jure Leskovec, and Stefanie Jegelka. How powerful are graph neural networks? In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    Open graph benchmark: Datasets for machine learning on graphs

    Weihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong, Hongyu Ren, Bowen Liu, Michele Catasta, and Jure Leskovec. Open graph benchmark: Datasets for machine learning on graphs. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 22118–22133, 2020

    2020

  8. [16]

    Gable, David Lyon, Alexander Junge, Stefan Wyder, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Milan Simonovic, Nadezhda T

    Damian Szklarczyk, Annika L. Gable, David Lyon, Alexander Junge, Stefan Wyder, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Milan Simonovic, Nadezhda T. Doncheva, John H. Morris, Peer Bork, et al. String v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery...

    2019

  9. [17]

    Wishart, Yannick D

    David S. Wishart, Yannick D. Feunang, An C. Guo, Elvis J. Lo, Ana Marcu, Jason R. Grant, Tanvir Sajed, Daniel Johnson, Carin Li, Zinat Sayeeda, et al. Drugbank 5.0: a major update to the drugbank database for 2018.Nucleic Acids Research, 46(D1):D1074–D1082, 2018

    2018

  10. [18]

    Wiegers, Robin J

    Allan Peter Davis, Thomas C. Wiegers, Robin J. Johnson, Daniela Sciaky, Jolene Wiegers, and Carolyn J. Mattingly. Comparative toxicogenomics database (ctd): update 2021.Nucleic Acids Research, 49(D1):D1138–D1143, 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    mirtarbase 2020: updates to the experimentally validated microrna- target interaction database.Nucleic Acids Research, 48(D1):D148–D154, 2020

    Hsi-Yuan Huang, Yu-Chen-Da Lin, Jing Li, Kai-Yao Huang, Sirjana Shrestha, Hsin-Chang Hong, Yi Tang, Yu-Gang Chen, Chun-Nan Jin, Yang Yu, et al. mirtarbase 2020: updates to the experimentally validated microrna- target interaction database.Nucleic Acids Research, 48(D1):D148–D154, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    Lnctard: a manually-curated database of experimentally-supported functional lncrna-target regulations in human diseases.Nucleic Acids Research, 48(D1):D118–D126, 2020

    Hongqiang Zhao, Jing Shi, Yijie Zhang, Aimei Xie, Liang Yu, Chunquan Zhang, Jianjun Lei, Huixiao Xu, Zhiguang Leng, Tianqi Li, et al. Lnctard: a manually-curated database of experimentally-supported functional lncrna-target regulations in human diseases.Nucleic Acids Research,...

    2020

  13. [21]

    Campbell, Gayatri Chavali, Carol Chen, Noemi del Toro, et al

    Sandra Orchard, Mais Ammari, Bruno Aranda, Lionel Breuza, Leonardo Briganti, Fiona Broackes-Carter, Nancy H. Campbell, Gayatri Chavali, Carol Chen, Noemi del Toro, et al. The mintact project–intact as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases.Nucleic Ac...

    2014

  14. [22]

    The gene ontology resource: enriching a gold mine.Nucleic Acids Research, 49(D1):D325–D334, 2021

    The Gene Ontology Consortium. The gene ontology resource: enriching a gold mine.Nucleic Acids Research, 49(D1):D325–D334, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Chen, Dexter Hadley, Ari Green, Pouya Khankhanian, and Sergio E

    Daniel Scott Himmelstein, Antoine Lizee, Christine Hessler, Leo Brueggeman, Sabrina L. Chen, Dexter Hadley, Ari Green, Pouya Khankhanian, and Sergio E. Baranzini. Systematic integration of biomedical knowledge prioritizes drugs for repurposing.eLife, 6:e26726, 2017

    2017

  16. [24]

    A knowledge graph to interpret clinical proteomics data

    Payal Chandak, Kexin Huang, and Marinka Zitnik. A knowledge graph to interpret clinical proteomics data. Nature Biotechnology, 41:754–764, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data

    Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Oksana Yakhnenko. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 2787–2795, 2013

    2013

  18. [26]

    Kipf, Peter Bloem, Rianne van den Berg, Ivan Titov, and Max Welling

    Michael Schlichtkrull, Thomas N. Kipf, Peter Bloem, Rianne van den Berg, Ivan Titov, and Max Welling. Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. InThe Semantic Web, pages 593–607. Springer, 2018

    2018

  19. [27]

    Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolu- tional networks.Bioinformatics, 34(13):i457–i466, 2018

    Marinka Zitnik, Monica Agrawal, and Jure Leskovec. Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolu- tional networks.Bioinformatics, 34(13):i457–i466, 2018

    2018

  20. [28]

    Jie Yang, Yapeng Li, Guoyin Wang, Zhong Chen, and Di Wu. An end-to-end knowledge graph fused graph neural network for accurate protein-protein interactions prediction.IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 21(6):2518–2530, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Jie Yang, Xijie Lan, Guoyin Wang, Zhong Chen, Yuwen Chen, and Di Wu. A hybrid ensemble end-to-end neural network for accurate protein-protein interactions prediction.IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 22(6):2540–2553, 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    Mkg-fenn: A multimodal knowledge graph fused end-to-end neural network for accurate drug-drug interaction prediction

    Di Wu, Wu Sun, Yi He, Zhong Chen, and Xin Luo. Mkg-fenn: A multimodal knowledge graph fused end-to-end neural network for accurate drug-drug interaction prediction. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 10216–10224, 2024. 7 MKGR for ...

    2024

  23. [31]

    Federated latent factor learning for privacy-preserving spatio-temporal signal recovery

    Chengjun Yu, Di Wu, Yi He, Jia Chen, and Xin Luo. Federated latent factor learning for privacy-preserving spatio-temporal signal recovery. InWWW, pages 2905–2916, 2026

    2026

  24. [32]

    A data-characteristic-aware latent factor model for web service qos prediction.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34(6):2525–2538, 2022

    Di Wu, Xin Luo, Mingsheng Shang, Yi He, Guoyin Wang, and Xindong Wu. A data-characteristic-aware latent factor model for web service qos prediction.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34(6):2525–2538, 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    A differential evolution-enhanced position-transitional approach to latent factor analysis.IEEE Trans

    Jia Chen, Renfang Wang, Di Wu, and Xin Luo. A differential evolution-enhanced position-transitional approach to latent factor analysis.IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell., 7(2):389–401, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Recursion-and-fuzziness reinforced online sparse streaming feature selection

    Ruiyang Xu, Di Wu, and Xin Luo. Recursion-and-fuzziness reinforced online sparse streaming feature selection. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 33(8):2574–2586, 2025

    2025

  27. [35]

    Mma: Multi-metric-autoencoder for analyzing high-dimensional and incomplete data

    Cheng Liang, Di Wu, Yi He, Teng Huang, Zhong Chen, and Xin Luo. Mma: Multi-metric-autoencoder for analyzing high-dimensional and incomplete data. InECML/PKDD (5), pages 3–19, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    A highly-accurate three-way decision-incorporated online sparse streaming features selection model.IEEE Trans

    Ruiyang Xu, Di Wu, Renfang Wang, and Xin Luo. A highly-accurate three-way decision-incorporated online sparse streaming features selection model.IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 55(6):4258–4272, 2025

    2025

  29. [37]

    Adaptive regularization-incorporated latent factor analysis

    Xin Luo, Ye Yuan, and Di Wu. Adaptive regularization-incorporated latent factor analysis. InICKG, pages 481–488, 2020

    2020

  30. [38]

    Algorithms of unconstrained non-negative latent factor analysis for recommender systems.IEEE Trans

    Xin Luo, Mengchu Zhou, Shuai Li, Di Wu, Zhigang Liu, and Mingsheng Shang. Algorithms of unconstrained non-negative latent factor analysis for recommender systems.IEEE Trans. Big Data, 7(1):227–240, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    A generalized and fast-converging non-negative latent factor model for predicting user preferences in recommender systems

    Ye Yuan, Xin Luo, Mingsheng Shang, and Di Wu. A generalized and fast-converging non-negative latent factor model for predicting user preferences in recommender systems. InWWW, pages 498–507, 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Neural nonnegative latent factorization of tensors model with acceleration and unconstraint.IEEE Trans

    Wenqiang Li, Mingwei Lin, Xiuqin Xu, Ling Lin, Zeshui Xu, and Xin Luo. Neural nonnegative latent factorization of tensors model with acceleration and unconstraint.IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 56(1):164–178, 2026

    2026

  33. [41]

    A sampling-neighborhood-regularized latent factorization of tensor for dynamic qos estimation.IEEE Trans

    Xiuqin Xu, Mingwei Lin, Zeshui Xu, and Xin Luo. A sampling-neighborhood-regularized latent factorization of tensor for dynamic qos estimation.IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag., 23:1707–1722, 2026

    2026

  34. [42]

    Online sparse streaming feature selection via decision risk

    Ruiyang Xu, Di Wu, and Xin Luo. Online sparse streaming feature selection via decision risk. InSMC, pages 4190–4195, 2023

    2023

  35. [43]

    Di Wu, Xin Luo, Yi He, and MengChu Zhou. A prediction-sampling-based multilayer-structured latent factor model for accurate representation to high-dimensional and sparse data.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 35(3):3845–3858, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    An error correction mid-term electricity load forecasting model based on seasonal decomposition

    Liping Zhang, Di Wu, and Xin Luo. An error correction mid-term electricity load forecasting model based on seasonal decomposition. InSMC, pages 2415–2420, 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    A double-space and double-norm ensembled latent factor model for highly accurate web service qos prediction.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 16(2):802–814, 2023

    Di Wu, Peng Zhang, Yi He, and Xin Luo. A double-space and double-norm ensembled latent factor model for highly accurate web service qos prediction.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 16(2):802–814, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    Adaptive tucker decomposition-based progressive model compression for convolutional neural networks.Expert Syst

    Yaping He, Hao Wu, and Xin Luo. Adaptive tucker decomposition-based progressive model compression for convolutional neural networks.Expert Syst. Appl., 308:131153, 2026

    2026

  39. [47]

    Tensor low-rank orthogonal compression for convolutional neural networks.IEEE CAA J

    Yaping He and Xin Luo. Tensor low-rank orthogonal compression for convolutional neural networks.IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 13(1):227–229, 2026

    2026

  40. [48]

    Neural tucker factorization.IEEE CAA J

    Peng Tang and Xin Luo. Neural tucker factorization.IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 12(2):475–477, 2025

    2025

  41. [49]

    Multi-aspect self-attending neural tucker factorization for spatiotemporal representation learning.IEEE CAA J

    Yikai Hou, Peng Tang, and Xin Luo. Multi-aspect self-attending neural tucker factorization for spatiotemporal representation learning.IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 13(4):986–988, 2026

    2026

  42. [50]

    Mpsant: A novel multi-projection self-attending neural tucker factorization model for high-dimensional and incomplete data representation learning.Inf

    Peng Tang, Yikai Hou, and Xin Luo. Mpsant: A novel multi-projection self-attending neural tucker factorization model for high-dimensional and incomplete data representation learning.Inf. Fusion, 135:104449, 2026

    2026

  43. [51]

    Dual channel graph convolutional networks via personalized pagerank.IEEE CAA J

    Longlong Lin and Xin Luo. Dual channel graph convolutional networks via personalized pagerank.IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 13(1):221–223, 2026

    2026

  44. [52]

    Modularized graph convolutional network.IEEE CAA J

    Tiantian He, Zhixuan Duan, and Xin Luo. Modularized graph convolutional network.IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 13(3):737–739, 2026

    2026

  45. [53]

    Advanced high-order graph convolutional networks with assorted time- frequency transforms.IEEE CAA J

    Ling Wang, Ye Yuan, and Xin Luo. Advanced high-order graph convolutional networks with assorted time- frequency transforms.IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 13(2):394–408, 2026

    2026

  46. [54]

    A graph-incorporated latent factor analysis model for high-dimensional and sparse data.IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 11(4):907–917, 2023

    Di Wu, Yi He, and Xin Luo. A graph-incorporated latent factor analysis model for high-dimensional and sparse data.IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 11(4):907–917, 2023

    2023

  47. [55]

    Graph tensor convolutional network.IEEE Trans

    Ling Wang, Ye Yuan, and Xin Luo. Graph tensor convolutional network.IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 56(5):3008–3024, 2026. 8 MKGR for Cold-Start PPI Prediction

    2026

  48. [56]

    Mmlf: multi-metric latent feature analysis for high-dimensional and incomplete data.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 17(2):575–588, 2024

    Di Wu, Peng Zhang, Yi He, and Xin Luo. Mmlf: multi-metric latent feature analysis for high-dimensional and incomplete data.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 17(2):575–588, 2024

    2024

  49. [57]

    A survey of latent factorization of tensor-based model compression: Algorithms, toolboxes and future directions.Neurocomputing, 682:133455, 2026

    Yaping He, Hao Wu, Weibo Liu, and Xin Luo. A survey of latent factorization of tensor-based model compression: Algorithms, toolboxes and future directions.Neurocomputing, 682:133455, 2026

    2026

  50. [58]

    A novel tensor causal convolution network model for highly-accurate representa- tion to spatio-temporal data.IEEE Trans Autom

    Xin Liao, Hao Wu, and Xin Luo. A novel tensor causal convolution network model for highly-accurate representa- tion to spatio-temporal data.IEEE Trans Autom. Sci. Eng., 22:19525–19537, 2025

    2025

  51. [59]

    Latent-factorization-of-tensors-incorporated battery cycle life prediction.IEEE CAA J

    Minzhi Chen, Li Tao, Jungang Lou, and Xin Luo. Latent-factorization-of-tensors-incorporated battery cycle life prediction.IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 12(3):633–635, 2025

    2025

  52. [60]

    Cm-cgns: Cross-modal clustering-guided negative sampling for self-supervised joint learning from medical images and reports.Expert Syst

    Libin Lan, Hongxing Li, Zunhui Xia, Juan Zhou, Xiaofei Zhu, Yongmei Li, Eugene Yu-Dong Zhang, and Xin Luo. Cm-cgns: Cross-modal clustering-guided negative sampling for self-supervised joint learning from medical images and reports.Expert Syst. Appl., 325:132577, 2026

    2026

  53. [61]

    Layer-wise correlation and attention discrepancy distillation for semantic segmentation.Pattern Recognit., 172:112438, 2026

    Jianping Gou, Kaijie Chen, Cheng Chen, Weihua Ou, Xin Luo, and Zhang Yi. Layer-wise correlation and attention discrepancy distillation for semantic segmentation.Pattern Recognit., 172:112438, 2026

    2026

  54. [62]

    A scalable multichannel sentiment analysis model with enhanced semantic understanding and redundancy reduction.IEEE Trans

    Jun Liu, Xiang Li, Mingwei Lin, and Xin Luo. A scalable multichannel sentiment analysis model with enhanced semantic understanding and redundancy reduction.IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst., 13(2):1513–1528, 2026

    2026

  55. [63]

    Fuzzy mixture-of-experts aggregation for organoid identification with multiscale state space features.IEEE Trans

    Xun Deng, Pengwei Hu, Thomas Herget, Feng Tan, Xiaobo Zhu, Jun Zhang, Yuan Huang, Lun Hu, Zhuhong You, and Xin Luo. Fuzzy mixture-of-experts aggregation for organoid identification with multiscale state space features.IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 34(1):324–335, 2026

    2026

  56. [64]

    Ncsac: Effective neural community search via attribute-augmented conductance.IEEE Trans

    Longlong Lin, Quanao Li, Miao Qiao, Zeli Wang, Jin Zhao, Rong-Hua Li, Xin Luo, and Tao Jia. Ncsac: Effective neural community search via attribute-augmented conductance.IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 38(2):1221–1235, 2026

    2026

  57. [65]

    An intelligent optimization-based residual negative magnitude shaping scheme for vibration control.IEEE Trans

    Weiyi Yang, Shuai Li, and Xin Luo. An intelligent optimization-based residual negative magnitude shaping scheme for vibration control.IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 73(2):3349–3360, 2026

    2026

  58. [66]

    A robust approach to electricity theft detection via tensor representation- driven contrastive distillation.IEEE Trans

    Wen Qin, Yuting Ding, and Xin Luo. A robust approach to electricity theft detection via tensor representation- driven contrastive distillation.IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics, 22(5):4561–4570, 2026

    2026

  59. [67]

    Knowledge-driven multiple instance learning with hierarchi- cal cluster-incorporated aware filtering for larynx pathological grading.IEEE J

    Chentao Li, Pan Huang, Harry Qin, and Xin Luo. Knowledge-driven multiple instance learning with hierarchi- cal cluster-incorporated aware filtering for larynx pathological grading.IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informatics, 30(4):2973–2985, 2026

    2026

  60. [68]

    Dynamic stochastic reorientation particle swarm optimization for adaptive latent factor analysis in high-dimensional sparse matrices.IEEE Trans

    Chao Lyu, Ziwen Ma, Xin Luo, and Yuhui Shi. Dynamic stochastic reorientation particle swarm optimization for adaptive latent factor analysis in high-dimensional sparse matrices.IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 38(1):222–234, 2026

    2026

  61. [69]

    Genetic algorithm-based two-step optimization for precise latent factor analysis.IEEE Trans

    Chao Lyu, Jingna Cheng, Xin Luo, and Yuhui Shi. Genetic algorithm-based two-step optimization for precise latent factor analysis.IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 37(5):2294–2306, 2026

    2026

  62. [70]

    Multi-scale collaborative distillation graph neural networks for session-based recommendation.IEEE Trans

    Jianping Gou, Youhui Cheng, Benteng Ma, Lan Du, Xin Luo, and Zhang Yi. Multi-scale collaborative distillation graph neural networks for session-based recommendation.IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., 19(1):504–517, 2026

    2026

  63. [71]

    Tracehg: An unsupervised dual-view framework for microservice anomaly detection.IEEE Trans

    Ningning Han, Siyang Lu, Zaichao Lin, Bin Li, Nan Wang, and Xin Luo. Tracehg: An unsupervised dual-view framework for microservice anomaly detection.IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., 19(2):1633–1646, 2026

    2026

  64. [72]

    Clorg: A contrastive learning-based framework for morphological representation and classification of organoids.Array, 27:100446, 2025

    Yafang Wei, Pengwei Hu, Xun Deng, Feng Tan, Thomas Herget, Mei Gao, Lun Hu, and Xin Luo. Clorg: A contrastive learning-based framework for morphological representation and classification of organoids.Array, 27:100446, 2025

    2025

  65. [73]

    Yantong Qiao, Lun Hu, Jun Zhang, Pengwei Hu, and Xin Luo. Identifying novel therapeutic targets of natural compounds in traditional chinese medicine herbs with hypergraph representation learning.Briefings Bioinform., 26(Supplement_1), 2025

    2025

  66. [74]

    Local search-based anytime algorithms for continuous distributed constraint optimization problems.IEEE CAA J

    Xin Liao, Khoi Hoang, and Xin Luo. Local search-based anytime algorithms for continuous distributed constraint optimization problems.IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 12(1):288–290, 2025

    2025

  67. [75]

    Analysis of students’ positive emotion and smile intensity using sequence-relative key-frame labeling and deep-asymmetric convolutional neural network

    Zhenzhen Luo, Xiaolu Jin, Yong Luo, Qiangqiang Zhou, and Xin Luo. Analysis of students’ positive emotion and smile intensity using sequence-relative key-frame labeling and deep-asymmetric convolutional neural network. IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 12(4):806–820, 2025

    2025

  68. [76]

    A proportional integral controller-enhanced non-negative latent factor analysis model.IEEE CAA J

    Ye Yuan, Siyang Lu, and Xin Luo. A proportional integral controller-enhanced non-negative latent factor analysis model.IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 12(6):1246–1259, 2025

    2025

  69. [77]

    Data-driven calibration of industrial robots: A comprehensive survey.IEEE CAA J

    Tinghui Chen, Weiyi Yang, Shuai Li, and Xin Luo. Data-driven calibration of industrial robots: A comprehensive survey.IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 12(8):1544–1567, 2025. 9 MKGR for Cold-Start PPI Prediction

    2025

  70. [78]

    A 3d convolution-incorporated dimension preserved decomposition model for traffic data prediction.IEEE Trans

    Mingwei Lin, Jiaqi Liu, Hong Chen, Xiuqin Xu, Xin Luo, and Zeshui Xu. A 3d convolution-incorporated dimension preserved decomposition model for traffic data prediction.IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 26(1):673– 690, 2025

    2025

  71. [79]

    Latent factor analysis model with temporal regularized constraint for road traffic data imputation.IEEE Trans

    Hengshuo Yang, Mingwei Lin, Hong Chen, Xin Luo, and Zeshui Xu. Latent factor analysis model with temporal regularized constraint for road traffic data imputation.IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 26(1):724–741, 2025

    2025

  72. [80]

    Regulation-aware graph learning for drug repositioning over heterogeneous biological network.Inf

    Bo-Wei Zhao, Xiao-Rui Su, Yue Yang, Dong-Xu Li, Guo-Dong Li, Peng-Wei Hu, Zhu-Hong You, Xin Luo, and Lun Hu. Regulation-aware graph learning for drug repositioning over heterogeneous biological network.Inf. Sci., 686:121360, 2025

    2025

  73. [81]

    Fdts: A feature disentangled transformer for interpretable squamous cell carcinoma grading.IEEE CAA J

    Pan Huang and Xin Luo. Fdts: A feature disentangled transformer for interpretable squamous cell carcinoma grading.IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 12(11):2365–2367, 2025

    2025

  74. [82]

    Advancing healthcare with large language models: Techniques and application.IEEE CAA J

    Zhenlin Hu, Zhizhi Peng, Zhen Bi, Qing Shen, Zhenfang Liu, Jungang Lou, and Xin Luo. Advancing healthcare with large language models: Techniques and application.IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 12(12):2371–2398, 2025

    2025

  75. [83]

    A comprehensive review of parallel optimization algorithms for high- dimensional and incomplete matrix factorization.IEEE CAA J

    Qicong Hu, Hao Wu, and Xin Luo. A comprehensive review of parallel optimization algorithms for high- dimensional and incomplete matrix factorization.IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, 12(12):2399–2426, 2025

    2025

  76. [84]

    A deep latent factor model for high-dimensional and sparse matrices in recommender systems.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(7):4285–4296, 2021

    Di Wu, Xin Luo, Mingsheng Shang, Yi He, Guoyin Wang, and MengChu Zhou. A deep latent factor model for high-dimensional and sparse matrices in recommender systems.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(7):4285–4296, 2021

    2021

  77. [85]

    Enhancing graph convolutional networks with an efficient k-hop neighborhood approach.Inf

    Jiufang Chen, Xin Luo, Ye Yuan, and Zidong Wang. Enhancing graph convolutional networks with an efficient k-hop neighborhood approach.Inf. Fusion, 124:103297, 2025

    2025

  78. [86]

    Searching for an accurate robot calibration via improved levenberg-marquardt and radial basis function system.J

    Zhibin Li, Xun Deng, Tinghui Chen, Yuhang Yang, Linlin Chen, Xiwen Yang, Zhenzhen Hu, Lun Hu, Pengwei Hu, Shuai Li, and Xin Luo. Searching for an accurate robot calibration via improved levenberg-marquardt and radial basis function system.J. Field Robotics, 42(6):2691–2700, 2025

    2025

  79. [87]

    A posterior-neighborhood-regularized latent factor model for highly accurate web service qos prediction.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 15(2):793–805, 2022

    Di Wu, Qiang He, Xin Luo, Mingsheng Shang, Yi He, and Guoyin Wang. A posterior-neighborhood-regularized latent factor model for highly accurate web service qos prediction.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 15(2):793–805, 2022

    2022

  80. [88]

    Learning error refinement in stochastic gradient descent-based latent factor analysis via diversified pid controllers.IEEE Trans

    Jinli Li, Ye Yuan, and Xin Luo. Learning error refinement in stochastic gradient descent-based latent factor analysis via diversified pid controllers.IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell., 9(5):3582–3597, 2025

    2025

  81. [89]

    Di Wu, Shihui Li, Yi He, Xin Luo, and Xinbo Gao. Non-gradient hash factor learning for high-dimensional and incomplete data representation learning.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 48(5):5811–5826, 2026

    2026

  82. [90]

    Esm2_amp: an interpretable framework for protein–protein interactions prediction and biological mechanism discovery.Briefings in Bioinformatics, 26(4):bbaf434, 2025

    Yawen Sun, Rui Wang, Zeyu Luo, Lejia Tan, Junhao Liu, Ruimeng Li, Dongqing Wei, and Yu-Juan Zhang. Esm2_amp: an interpretable framework for protein–protein interactions prediction and biological mechanism discovery.Briefings in Bioinformatics, 26(4):bbaf434, 2025. 10

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.