pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02245 · v1 · pith:JPDZYKKVnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.CY· cs.HC

Copewell: A Multi-Agent Swarm Architecture for Equitable Mental Wellness Support

Seren Yenikent , Jack Vinijtrongjit , Katherine Ng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 13:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI cs.CYcs.HC
keywords multi-agent systemsmental wellnessalgorithmic biasemotion mappingAI ethicswellness interventionsswarm architectureresponsible AI
0
0 comments X

The pith

Copewell proposes a multi-agent swarm to deliver equitable mental wellness support by integrating multi-source data, emotion routing, and dual interventions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents Copewell as a multi-agent swarm system to address global gaps in mental health treatment caused by workforce shortages, costs, and stigma. It claims three innovations address shortcomings in existing single-mode AI tools: a framework that combines self-reported, physiological, and contextual data to reduce bias, valence-arousal mapping to direct users to specialized agents, and delivery that pairs conversation with sensory protocols. The architecture embeds privacy protections and an ethics supervisor agent, informed by practitioner input and early beta testing. If the design works as intended, it would operationalize equity and safety principles directly into the technical structure for broader access.

Core claim

Copewell is a novel multi-agent swarm system designed to expand access to mental wellness support through human-centered AI principles. Its architecture features a multi-source assessment framework integrating self-reported, physiological, and contextual data to mitigate algorithmic bias, valence-arousal emotion mapping using Russell's Circumplex Model of Affect to route users to specialized AI agents, and dual-mode intervention delivery combining conversational support with evidence-based sensory wellness protocols, all within a privacy-first architecture and with embedded ethical oversight through a dedicated Ethics Supervisor agent.

What carries the argument

The multi-agent swarm architecture that uses valence-arousal emotion mapping to route users to specialized agents and combines conversational and sensory intervention modes.

If this is right

  • Algorithmic bias decreases when assessments draw from multiple data sources rather than single inputs.
  • Users receive support matched to their current emotional state through specialized agent routing.
  • Relief occurs through combined conversational and sensory protocols calibrated to dynamic states.
  • Equity and safety principles become part of the system architecture from the initial design stage.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The routing mechanism could apply to other domains needing personalized emotional calibration, such as chronic illness management.
  • Real-world deployment data from low-resource settings would reveal whether the privacy and ethics features affect user retention.
  • Participatory input from practitioners suggests the design could scale to team-based care models that blend AI with human oversight.

Load-bearing premise

That the multi-source assessment, emotion mapping, and dual-mode delivery will mitigate algorithmic bias and deliver measurable immediate relief despite the paper offering only a design description without empirical validation.

What would settle it

A controlled comparison study measuring bias indicators and relief outcomes for users of the Copewell system versus standard single-mode conversational AI across diverse demographic groups.

read the original abstract

Mental health disorders affect nearly one billion people globally, yet 75% of individuals in low- and middle-income countries receive no treatment due to workforce shortages, cost barriers, and stigma. Current AI-powered wellness solutions predominantly rely on single-mode conversational interfaces that suffer high abandonment rates and fail to provide measurable, immediate relief calibrated to users' dynamic emotional states. This paper presents Copewell, a novel multi-agent swarm system designed to expand access to mental wellness support through human-centered AI principles. Our architecture introduces three technical innovations: (1) a multi-source assessment framework integrating self-reported, physiological, and contextual data to mitigate algorithmic bias; (2) valence-arousal emotion mapping using Russell's Circumplex Model of Affect to route users to specialized AI agents; and (3) dual-mode intervention delivery combining conversational support with evidence-based sensory wellness protocols. We examine the sociotechnical design considerations underlying Copewell's development, including a privacy-first architecture, embedded ethical oversight through a dedicated Ethics Supervisor agent, and participatory design informed by mental health practitioners. Early practitioner engagement and beta deployment inform design decisions and identify directions for future empirical evaluation. This work contributes to responsible AI discourse by demonstrating how technical architecture can operationalize equity and safety principles from inception.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Copewell, a multi-agent swarm architecture for equitable mental wellness support targeting global treatment gaps. It describes three innovations: (1) a multi-source assessment integrating self-reported, physiological, and contextual data to mitigate bias; (2) valence-arousal mapping via Russell's Circumplex Model to route users to specialized agents; and (3) dual-mode delivery of conversational and sensory interventions. The work also covers privacy-first design, an Ethics Supervisor agent, participatory input from practitioners, and early beta deployment as informing future evaluation.

Significance. If the described mechanisms were shown to function as intended, the architecture could contribute to responsible AI for mental health by embedding equity and safety considerations into system design from the outset, leveraging established models like Russell's Circumplex. The participatory and privacy-focused elements represent standard strengths in sociotechnical proposals, but the manuscript supplies no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or falsifiable predictions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the multi-source assessment framework 'mitigate[s] algorithmic bias' and that dual-mode delivery provides 'measurable, immediate relief' is load-bearing for the equity contribution, yet the manuscript provides only design descriptions with no fairness metrics, simulation results, comparative baselines, or outcome data to support these effects rather than intentions.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and closing paragraph: the statement that the work 'demonstrat[es] how technical architecture can operationalize equity and safety principles' is unsupported, as the text contains no evaluation of the three innovations against any bias or efficacy criteria despite referencing unspecified 'early practitioner engagement and beta deployment.'

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We agree that the abstract uses language implying demonstrated effects and evaluations that are not present in the manuscript, which is a design proposal for the Copewell architecture. We will revise the abstract (and closing paragraph) to align claims with the paper's scope as a systems description rather than an empirical study.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the multi-source assessment framework 'mitigate[s] algorithmic bias' and that dual-mode delivery provides 'measurable, immediate relief' is load-bearing for the equity contribution, yet the manuscript provides only design descriptions with no fairness metrics, simulation results, comparative baselines, or outcome data to support these effects rather than intentions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract phrasing presents these as achieved outcomes rather than design intentions. The multi-source assessment integrates self-reported, physiological, and contextual data specifically to address single-source bias risks, and dual-mode delivery combines conversational and sensory protocols drawn from established wellness literature. However, the manuscript contains no quantitative fairness metrics, simulations, or outcome data. As this is a proposal paper, we will revise the abstract to state that the framework is 'designed to mitigate algorithmic bias' and 'intended to provide measurable, immediate relief' to accurately reflect the contribution. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and closing paragraph: the statement that the work 'demonstrat[es] how technical architecture can operationalize equity and safety principles' is unsupported, as the text contains no evaluation of the three innovations against any bias or efficacy criteria despite referencing unspecified 'early practitioner engagement and beta deployment.'

    Authors: We agree that 'demonstrates' implies formal evaluation against bias or efficacy criteria, which is absent. The manuscript describes how the architecture incorporates equity and safety via the three innovations, the Ethics Supervisor agent, privacy-first design, and participatory input from practitioners; the beta deployment is referenced only as informing design decisions. No evaluation data or criteria-based assessment is provided. We will revise the abstract and closing paragraph to state that the architecture 'is designed to operationalize equity and safety principles' and clarify that empirical evaluation remains future work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: architecture description with no derivations, fits, or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is a design paper that outlines three architectural innovations (multi-source assessment, valence-arousal mapping via Russell's model, dual-mode delivery) and sociotechnical considerations without any equations, parameter estimation, predictive claims, or load-bearing self-citations. All claims are presented as intended design features rather than derived results that reduce to the inputs by construction; the absence of any quantitative evaluation or fitted quantities means there is no derivation chain to inspect for circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As this is an architecture proposal without mathematical models or empirical fitting, there are no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities identified from the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5756 in / 1290 out tokens · 43479 ms · 2026-07-03T13:50:40.363246+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    State of the World's Nursing 2020: Investing in Education, Jobs and Leadership; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020

    Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2030. https://www.who.int/ publications/i/item/9789240031029. Accessed 3 June 2026

    work page arXiv 2013

  2. [3]

    Lancet 392:1553–1598

    Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, Thornicroft G, Baingana F, Bolton P, Chisholm D, Collins PY, Cooper JL, Eaton J, Herrman H, Herzallah MM, Huang Y, Jor- dans MJD, Kleinman A, Medina-Mora ME, Morgan E, Niaz U, Omigbodun O, Prince M, Rahman A, Saraceno B, Sarkar BK, De Silva M, Singh I, Stein DJ, Sunkel C, Un ¨Utzer J¨ u (2018) The Lancet Commission on global men...

    2018

  3. [4]

    OECD Health Policy Stud

    OECD (2026) The Economic Case for Preventing Mental Ill Health. OECD Health Policy Stud. https://doi.org/10.1787/16668f16-en

    work page doi:10.1787/16668f16-en 2026

  4. [5]

    Health Glance 2025:

    OECD (2025) Health at a Glance 2025: OECD Indicators. Health Glance 2025:. https://doi.org/10.1787/8f9e3f98-en

    work page doi:10.1787/8f9e3f98-en 2025

  5. [6]

    Curr Treat Options Psychiatry 1–15

    King DR, Emerson MR, Tartaglia J, Nanda G, Tatro NA (2023) Methods for Navigating the Mobile Mental Health App Landscape for Clinical Use. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-023-00288-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s40501-023-00288-4 2023

  6. [7]

    Acta Psychiatr Scand 144:201–210

    Lagan S, D’Mello R, Vaidyam A, Bilden R, Torous J (2021) Assessing mental health apps marketplaces with objective metrics from 29,190 data points from 278 apps. Acta Psychiatr Scand 144:201–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13306

    work page doi:10.1111/acps.13306 2021

  7. [8]

    Front Digit Health 7:

    Schlicher M, Li Y, Murthy SMK, Sun Q, Schuller BW (2025) Emotionally adap- tive support: a narrative review of affective computing for mental health. Front Digit Health 7:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1657031 21

    work page doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1657031 2025

  8. [9]

    https://www.2minutemedicine.com/ mental-health-apps-improve-well-being-mental-health-and-emotional-regulation/

    Liblik K (2021) Mental health apps improve well-being, mental health, and emotional regulation|2 Minute Medicine. https://www.2minutemedicine.com/ mental-health-apps-improve-well-being-mental-health-and-emotional-regulation/. Accessed 5 June 2026

    2021

  9. [10]

    J Med Internet Res 21:e14567

    Baumel A, Muench F, Edan S, Kane JM (2019) Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis. J Med Internet Res 21:e14567. https://doi.org/10.2196/14567

    work page doi:10.2196/14567 2019

  10. [11]

    Biol Psychia- try Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 6:856–864

    Lee EE, Torous J, De Choudhury M, Depp CA, Graham SA, Kim H-C, Paulus MP, Krystal JH, Jeste DV (2021) Artificial Intelligence for Mental Healthcare: Clinical Applications, Barriers, Facilitators, and Artificial Wisdom. Biol Psychia- try Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 6:856–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2021. 02.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2021 2021

  11. [12]

    In: Headspace

    About Us. In: Headspace. https://www.headspace.com/about-us. Accessed 22 June 2026

    2026

  12. [13]

    JMIR Hum Factors 9:e35668

    Malik T, Ambrose AJ, Sinha C (2022) Evaluating User Feedback for an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Based Mental Health App (Wysa): Qualitative Thematic Analysis. JMIR Hum Factors 9:e35668. https:// doi.org/10.2196/35668

    work page doi:10.2196/35668 2022

  13. [14]

    JMIR Ment Health 4:e7785

    Fitzpatrick KK, Darcy A, Vierhile M (2017) Delivering Cognitive Behavior Ther- apy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Ment Health 4:e7785. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7785

    work page doi:10.2196/mental.7785 2017

  14. [15]

    Child Youth Serv Rev 77:164–176

    Anderson JK, Howarth E, Vainre M, Jones PB, Humphrey A (2017) A scoping literature review of service-level barriers for access and engagement with mental health services for children and young people. Child Youth Serv Rev 77:164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.04.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.04.017 2017

  15. [16]

    J Pers Med 12:1376

    Koh J, Tng GYQ, Hartanto A (2022) Potential and Pitfalls of Mobile Mental Health Apps in Traditional Treatment: An Umbrella Review. J Pers Med 12:1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091376

    work page doi:10.3390/jpm12091376 2022

  16. [17]

    Int J Human–Computer Interact 36:1354–1367

    Ha SW, Kim J (2020) Designing a Scalable, Accessible, and Effective Mobile App Based Solution for Common Mental Health Problems. Int J Human–Computer Interact 36:1354–1367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1750792

    work page doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1750792 2020

  17. [18]

    IEEE Access 8:111141–111158

    Oyebode O, Alqahtani F, Orji R (2020) Using Machine Learning and Thematic Analysis Methods to Evaluate Mental Health Apps Based on User Reviews. IEEE Access 8:111141–111158. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002176

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2020.3002176 2020

  18. [19]

    Child Adolesc 22 Ment Health 18:165–170

    Bowers H, Manion I, Papadopoulos D, Gauvreau E (2013) Stigma in school-based mental health: perceptions of young people and service providers. Child Adolesc 22 Ment Health 18:165–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2012.00673.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1475-3588.2012.00673.x 2013

  19. [20]

    (2022) Help-Seeking Tendencies and Subjective Well-Being: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the United States and Japan

    Lua VYQ, Majeed NM, Hartanto A, Leung AK -y. (2022) Help-Seeking Tendencies and Subjective Well-Being: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the United States and Japan. Soc Psychol Q 85:164–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 01902725221077075

    2022

  20. [21]

    World Psychiatry 18:

    Linardon J, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P, Messer M, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M (2019) The efficacy of app-supported smartphone interventions for mental health problems: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry 18:. https:// doi.org/10.1002/wps.20673

    work page doi:10.1002/wps.20673 2019

  21. [22]

    World Psychiatry 16:

    Firth J, Torous J, Nicholas J, Carney R, Pratap A, Rosenbaum S, Sarris J (2017) The efficacy of smartphone-based mental health interventions for depres- sive symptoms: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry 16:. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20472

    work page doi:10.1002/wps.20472 2017

  22. [23]

    A meta-analysis of 176 randomized controlled trials

    Linardon J, Torous J, Firth J, Cuijpers P, Messer M, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M (2024) Current evidence on the efficacy of mental health smartphone apps for symptoms of depression and anxiety. A meta-analysis of 176 randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry 23:. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21183

    work page doi:10.1002/wps.21183 2024

  23. [24]

    JMIR Ment Health 9:

    Lu S-C, Xu M, Wang M, Hardi A, Cheng A, Chang S-H, Yen P-Y (2022) Effectiveness and Minimum Effective Dose of App-Based Mobile Health Interven- tions for Anxiety and Depression Symptom Reduction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Ment Health 9:. https://doi.org/10.2196/39454

    work page doi:10.2196/39454 2022

  24. [25]

    JMIR Ment Health 11:

    Lam LT, Lam MK (2024) A Web-Based and Mobile Intervention Program Using a Spaced Education Approach for Workplace Mental Health Literacy: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Ment Health 11:. https://doi.org/10.2196/ 51791

    2024

  25. [26]

    JMIR Ment Health 8:

    Eisenstadt M, Liverpool S, Infanti E, Ciuvat R, Carlsson C (2021) Mobile Apps That Promote Emotion Regulation, Positive Mental Health, and Well-being in the General Population: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JMIR Ment Health 8:. https://doi.org/10.2196/31170

    work page doi:10.2196/31170 2021

  26. [27]

    JMIR Ment Health 5:

    Mak WWS, Tong ACY, Yip SY, Lui WW, Chio FHN, Chan A, Wong C (2018) Efficacy and Moderation of Mobile App–Based Programs for Mindfulness-Based Training, Self-Compassion Training, and Cognitive Behavioral Psychoeducation on Mental Health: Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial. JMIR Ment Health 5:. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.8597

    work page doi:10.2196/mental.8597 2018

  27. [28]

    JMIR MHealth UHealth 9:e29689

    Lau N, O’Daffer A, Yi-Frazier JP, Rosenberg AR (2021) Popular Evidence- Based Commercial Mental Health Apps: Analysis of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information Quality. JMIR MHealth UHealth 9:e29689. https: //doi.org/10.2196/29689 23

    work page doi:10.2196/29689 2021

  28. [29]

    BMJ Open 11:

    Lagan S, Sandler L, Torous J (2021) Evaluating evaluation frameworks: a scoping review of frameworks for assessing health apps. BMJ Open 11:. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047001

    work page doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047001 2021

  29. [30]

    Front Psychiatry 10:

    Marshall JM, Dunstan DA, Bartik W (2019) The Digital Psychiatrist: In Search of Evidence-Based Apps for Anxiety and Depression. Front Psychiatry 10:. https: //doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00831

    work page doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00831 2019

  30. [31]

    Inf Syst Front 24:923–943

    Ahmad R, Siemon D, Gnewuch U, Robra-Bissantz S (2022) Designing Personality-Adaptive Conversational Agents for Mental Health Care. Inf Syst Front 24:923–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10254-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10254-9 2022

  31. [32]

    mHealth 10:

    Chaudhry B, Debi HR (2023) User perceptions and experiences of an AI-driven conversational agent for mental health support. mHealth 10:. https://doi.org/10. 21037/mhealth-23-55

    2023

  32. [33]

    Int J Med Inf 185:

    Martins A, Londral A, Nunes IL, Lap˜ ao L (2024) Unlocking human-like con- versations: Scoping review of automation techniques for personalized healthcare interventions using conversational agents. Int J Med Inf 185:. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105385

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [34]

    https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000785

    Parrish EM, Filip T, Torous J, Nebeker C, Moore R, Depp C (2021) Are Mental Health Apps Adequately Equipped to Handle Users in Crisis? Crisis 43:289–298. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000785

    work page doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000785 2021

  34. [35]

    BMC Med 17:

    Martinengo L, Galen LV van, Lum E, Kowalski M, Subramaniam M, Car J (2019) Suicide prevention and depression apps’ suicide risk assessment and management: a systematic assessment of adherence to clinical guidelines. BMC Med 17:. https: //doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1461-z

    work page doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1461-z 2019

  35. [36]

    JMIR Ment Health 8:

    Gooding P, Kariotis T (2021) Ethics and Law in Research on Algorithmic and Data-Driven Technology in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review. JMIR Ment Health 8:. https://doi.org/10.2196/24668

    work page doi:10.2196/24668 2021

  36. [37]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100844

    Svensson E, Osika W, Carlbring P (2025) Commentary: Trustworthy and ethical AI in digital mental healthcare – wishful thinking or tangible goal? Internet Interv 41:100844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100844

    work page doi:10.1016/j.invent.2025.100844 2025

  37. [38]

    Comput 14:

    Fanarioti AK, Karpouzis K (2025) Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Mental Health in a Digitally Transformed World. Comput 14:. https://doi.org/10.3390/ computers14070259

    2025

  38. [39]

    J Med Internet Res 25:

    Chin H, Song H, Baek G, Shin M, Jung C, Cha M, Choi J, Cha C (2023) The Potential of Chatbots for Emotional Support and Promoting Mental Well-Being in Different Cultures: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 25:. https:// doi.org/10.2196/51712 24

    work page doi:10.2196/51712 2023

  39. [40]

    JMIR Ment Health 12:

    Boit S, Patil R (2025) A Prompt Engineering Framework for Large Language Model–Based Mental Health Chatbots: Conceptual Framework. JMIR Ment Health 12:. https://doi.org/10.2196/75078

    work page doi:10.2196/75078 2025

  40. [41]

    JMIR Ment Health 12:

    Meadi MR, Sillekens T, Metselaar S, Balkom A van, Bernstein J, Batelaan N (2025) Exploring the Ethical Challenges of Conversational AI in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review. JMIR Ment Health 12:. https://doi.org/10.2196/60432

    work page doi:10.2196/60432 2025

  41. [42]

    The MIT Press

    Picard RW (1997) Affective Computing. The MIT Press

    1997

  42. [43]

    Front Comput Sci 7:

    Farsadaki V, Griffy-Brown C (2026) AI affective computing and behavioral health. Front Comput Sci 7:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1692728

    work page doi:10.3389/fcomp.2025.1692728 2026

  43. [44]

    Wang Y, Song W, Tao W, Liotta A, Yang D, Li X, Gao S, Sun Y, Ge W, Zhang W, Zhang W (2022) A Systematic Review on Affective Computing: Emotion Models, Databases, and Recent Advances

    2022

  44. [45]

    Cogn Emot 6:169–200

    Ekman P (1992) An argument for basic emotions. Cogn Emot 6:169–200. https: //doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068

    work page doi:10.1080/02699939208411068 1992

  45. [46]

    T Affect Comput 1:18–37

    Calvo R, D’Mello S (2010) Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications. T Affect Comput 1:18–37. https: //doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2010.1

    work page doi:10.1109/t-affc.2010.1 2010

  46. [47]

    ACM Comput Surv CSUR 47:43:1-43:36

    D’mello SK, Kory J (2015) A Review and Meta-Analysis of Multimodal Affect Detection Systems. ACM Comput Surv CSUR 47:43:1-43:36. https://doi.org/10. 1145/2682899

    2015

  47. [48]

    Soc Sci Inf 21:529–

    Plutchik R (1982) A psychoevolutionary theory of emotions. Soc Sci Inf 21:529–

    1982

  48. [49]

    https://doi.org/10.1177/053901882021004003

    work page doi:10.1177/053901882021004003

  49. [50]

    J Pers Soc Psychol 39:1161–1178

    Russell JA (1980) A circumplex model of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol 39:1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714

    work page doi:10.1037/h0077714 1980

  50. [51]

    Trans Jpn Soc Kansei Eng

    Egawa S, Sejima Y, Sato Y (2019) Proposal of an Estimation Method of Emotional Centroid Based on the Russell’s Circumplex Model for Quantitative Evaluation of Affect. Trans Jpn Soc Kansei Eng. https://doi.org/10.5057/jjske. tjske-d-18-00069

    work page doi:10.5057/jjske 2019

  51. [52]

    Nat Mach Intell 3:42–50

    Toisoul A, Kossaifi J, Bulat A, Tzimiropoulos G, Pantic M (2021) Estimation of continuous valence and arousal levels from faces in naturalistic conditions. Nat Mach Intell 3:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-00280-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00280-0 2021

  52. [53]

    GUILFORD PUBN, New York London

    Beck JS, Beck AT (2021) Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Third Edition: Basics and Beyond. GUILFORD PUBN, New York London

    2021

  53. [54]

    In: Wiley.com

    An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems, 2nd Edi- tion|Wiley. In: Wiley.com. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/ 25 an-introduction-to-multiagent-systems-2nd-edition-p-9780470519462. Accessed 2 June 2026

    2026

  54. [55]

    Cell Rep Med 6:102374

    Liu F, Niu Y, Zhang Q, Wang K, Dong Z, Wong IN, Cheng L, Li T, Duan L, Li K, Li G, Hou TW, Fok M, Luo H, Chen X, Zhang K, Yin Y (2025) A foundational architecture for AI agents in healthcare. Cell Rep Med 6:102374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102374

    work page doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102374 2025

  55. [56]

    SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Porto, Portugal, pp 46–57

    Silva F, Santos P, Dias J (2025) MentalRAG: Developing an Agentic Framework for Therapeutic Support Systems: In: Proceedings of the 11th International Con- ference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Porto, Portugal, pp 46–57

    2025

  56. [57]

    Lee Y, Park S, Cho K, Bak J (2024) MentalAgora: A Gateway to Advanced Personalized Care in Mental Health through Multi-Agent Debating and Attribute Control

    2024

  57. [58]

    In: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2026

    Wang F, Yang J, Chen J, Liu Y, Li K, Wei Y, Guo D, Wang M (2026) XInsight: Integrative Stage-Consistent Psychological Counseling Support Agents for Digital Well-Being. In: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2026. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 9297–9308

    2026

  58. [59]

    Appl Sci

    Garc´ ıa-Oc´ on M, Herrero-Mart´ ın P (2025) Towards Intelligent Care: Computa- tional Multi-Agent Architectures for Digital Management of Anxiety Episodes and Personal Well-Being. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910544

    work page doi:10.3390/app151910544 2025

  59. [60]

    In: Aldinhas Ferreira MI, Silva Sequeira J, Singh Virk G, Tokhi MO, E

    Chatila R, Havens JC (2019) The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. In: Aldinhas Ferreira MI, Silva Sequeira J, Singh Virk G, Tokhi MO, E. Kadar E (eds) Robotics and Well-Being. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 11–16

    2019

  60. [61]

    (2024) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amend- ing Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Inte...

    2024

  61. [62]

    In: OECD

    AI principles. In: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/ai-principles.html. Accessed 11 June 2026

    2026

  62. [63]

    World Psychiatry Off J World Psychiatr Assoc 23:444–445

    Golden A, Aboujaoude E (2024) The Framework for AI Tool Assessment in Mental Health (FAITA - Mental Health): a scale for evaluating AI-powered men- tal health tools. World Psychiatry Off J World Psychiatr Assoc 23:444–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21248 26

    work page doi:10.1002/wps.21248 2024

  63. [64]

    Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Dignum V (2019) Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    2019

  64. [65]

    Friedman B, Hendry D (2019) Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination

    2019

  65. [66]

    Rev Sa´ ude P´ ublica 56:101–101

    J´ unior JPB (2022) Vi´ es de desejabilidade social na pesquisa qualitativa em sa´ ude. Rev Sa´ ude P´ ublica 56:101–101. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787. 2022056004164

    work page doi:10.11606/s1518-8787 2022

  66. [67]

    Proc IEEE 111:1287–

    Can YS, Mahesh B, Andr´ e E (2023) Approaches, Applications, and Challenges in Physiological Emotion Recognition—A Tutorial Overview. Proc IEEE 111:1287–

    2023

  67. [68]

    https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2023.3286445

    work page doi:10.1109/jproc.2023.3286445 2023

  68. [69]

    Annu Rev Clin Psychol 4:1–32

    Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR (2008) Ecological momentary assess- ment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 4:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3. 022806.091415

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3 2008

  69. [70]

    J Context Behav Sci 20:172–183

    Hayes SC, Merwin RM, McHugh L, Sandoz EK, A-Tjak JGL, Ruiz FJ, Barnes- Holmes D, Bricker JB, Ciarrochi J, Dixon MR, Fung KP-L, Gloster AT, Gobin RL, Gould ER, Hofmann SG, Kasujja R, Karekla M, Luciano C, McCracken LM (2021) Report of the ACBS Task Force on the strategies and tactics of contextual behavioral science research. J Context Behav Sci 20:172–183...

    2021

  70. [71]

    use: our words, our selves

    Pennebaker JW, Mehl MR, Niederhoffer KG (2003) Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves. Annu Rev Psychol 54:547–577. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041 2003

  71. [72]

    Annu Rev Psychol 55:1–22

    Mischel W (2004) Toward an integrative science of the person. Annu Rev Psychol 55:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.042902.130709

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.042902.130709 2004

  72. [73]

    Brain Res 1079:98–105

    Beer JS, Ochsner KN (2006) Social cognition: a multi level analysis. Brain Res 1079:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.002 2006

  73. [74]

    PLOS ONE 13:e0196645

    Poerio GL, Blakey E, Hostler TJ, Veltri T (2018) More than a feeling: Autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR) is characterized by reliable changes in affect and physiology. PLOS ONE 13:e0196645. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0196645

    2018

  74. [75]

    Tada K, Ezaki T, Kondo HM (2021) The Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response Activates the Parasympathetic Nervous System

    2021

  75. [76]

    2023.10.25.563865 27

    Frohlich J, Simonian N, Hanada G, Kothe C, Reggente N (2023) Neural entrain- ment induced by periodic audiovisual stimulation: A large-sample EEG study. 2023.10.25.563865 27

    2023

  76. [77]

    Xu N, Smith DM, Jeno G, Seeburger DT, Schumacher EH, Keilholz SD (2023) The interaction between random and systematic visual stimulation and infraslow quasi-periodic spatiotemporal patterns of whole-brain activity. 1:

    2023

  77. [78]

    Taylor RP The Potential of Biophilic Fractal Designs to Promote Health and Performance: A Review of Experiments and Applications

  78. [79]

    Adv Neurobiol 36:907–934

    Taylor RP, Viengkham C, Smith JH, Rowland C, Moslehi S, Stadlober S, Lesjak A, Lesjak M, Spehar B (2024) Fractal Fluency: Processing of Fractal Stimuli Across Sight, Sound, and Touch. Adv Neurobiol 36:907–934. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-031-47606-8 45

    2024

  79. [80]

    Psychon Bull Rev 32:1457–1486

    Jonauskaite D, Mohr C (2025) Do we feel colours? A systematic review of 128 years of psychological research linking colours and emotions. Psychon Bull Rev 32:1457–1486. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02615-z

    work page doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02615-z 2025

  80. [81]

    PLOS ONE 18:e0286023

    Ingendoh RM, Posny ES, Heine A (2023) Binaural beats to entrain the brain? A systematic review of the effects of binaural beat stimulation on brain oscillatory activity, and the implications for psychological research and intervention. PLOS ONE 18:e0286023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286023

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286023 2023

Showing first 80 references.