Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 101 references

Motifs that give Koopman constants of motion turn a random Kuramoto network into a partially integrable system that can be reduced by operator methods.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 08:48 UTC pith:JHY6ZOTH

load-bearing objection Solid construction of partially integrable Kuramoto networks plus a clean operator derivation of WS; formal gaps on Magnus are flagged by the authors themselves. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.02617 v1 pith:JHY6ZOTH submitted 2026-07-01 math.DS math-phmath.MPnlin.AOnlin.SI

Operator-theoretic approach to the partial integration of randomly coupled phase oscillators

Vincent Thibeault , Benjamin Claveau , Antoine Allard , Patrick Desrosiers This is my paper
classification math.DS math-phmath.MPnlin.AOnlin.SI MSC 37N2534C1537C1005C80
keywords Kuramoto modelKoopman generatorpartial integrabilityWatanabe-Strogatz transformationnetwork motifsMagnus expansionBaker-Campbell-Hausdorff formulacross-ratios
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a modular random graph whose blocks are network motifs known to admit either monomial eigenfunctions of the Koopman generator or conserved cross-ratios. On that graph the Kuramoto equations split into three pieces: monomial parts, cross-ratio parts, and a residual non-integrable core. For the monomial blocks a linear change of variables produces m−1 independent constants of motion and lowers the dimension by that amount. For the cross-ratio blocks the Koopman generator is aligned, along each trajectory, with a non-autonomous Riccati generator; Magnus expansion plus Matone’s closed Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula then yields the Watanabe-Strogatz disk automorphism, reducing each such block of size nγ to three real equations. The net result is an exact closed system whose dimension is N minus the total number of independent constants of motion. The construction therefore supplies both a concrete family of partially integrable oscillator networks and an operator-theoretic route to the classical Watanabe-Strogatz transformation.

Core claim

A random graph assembled from motifs that admit monomial Koopman eigenfunctions and conserved cross-ratios defines a partially integrable Kuramoto model that can be reduced, by an operator-theoretic procedure based on Magnus expansion and Matone’s BCH formula, to a closed autonomous system of dimension N − (m − 1) − Σγ(nγ − 3).

What carries the argument

The alignment of each autonomous Koopman generator Kγ with a non-autonomous Riccati generator Rγ(t) along solution curves, followed by Magnus expansion and Matone’s closed-form BCH formula for PSU(1,1), which produces the Watanabe-Strogatz disk automorphism.

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the autonomous generator with the non-autonomous Riccati generator holds only along individual trajectories, and the Magnus series is assumed to converge without a proved radius of convergence or a specified function space for the coefficients.

What would settle it

Construct an instance of the random matrix model, integrate both the full N-dimensional Kuramoto system and the reduced system of Table II from identical initial data, and check whether the trajectories of the original oscillators coincide (up to the known constants of motion) for a finite time interval; any systematic divergence falsifies the claimed reduction.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a modular random graph of Kuramoto oscillators whose blocks are network motifs known (from the authors’ prior work) to admit monomial Koopman eigenfunctions or conserved cross-ratios. The resulting partially integrable model is reduced by an operator-theoretic procedure: a linear change of coordinates for the monomial blocks, and, for the cross-ratio blocks, an identification of the autonomous Koopman generator with a non-autonomous Riccati generator along solution curves, followed by Magnus expansion and a specialisation of Matone’s closed BCH formula to PSU(1,1). This yields an explicit operator derivation of the Watanabe–Strogatz (Möbius) transformation and a closed reduced system of dimension N-(m-1)-∑(nγ-3), summarised in Tables I–II.

Significance. If the formal steps hold, the work supplies a systematic, motif-based route to partial integrability for heterogeneous Kuramoto networks beyond the classical all-to-all or star cases, and gives a transparent operator-theoretic derivation of the WS map that does not rely on an a-priori Ansatz. The construction is modular, the reduced equations are explicit, and reproducible code for the random-matrix ensemble is provided. The framework is also indicated to extend, at least formally, to other Riccati-type oscillator models. These features make the paper a useful contribution to the mathematical theory of synchronisation and dimension reduction on networks.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III B / Lemma S2 / Conclusion] Sec. III B and Lemma S2 (SI): the central identification Kγ = Rγ(t) holds only along individual solution curves. The subsequent Magnus series for exp(Lγ(t)) is written formally (low-order terms appear in SI) but no radius of convergence or function-space setting for the coefficients qγ(t) is supplied. Because the operator derivation of the WS map rests on this series, the claim that the transformation has been rigorously obtained remains conditional on an open analytic question that the Conclusion itself flags. A precise statement of the formal character of the argument, or a reference to known convergence results for the sl(2)-valued Magnus expansion under the present regularity, is needed for the derivation to be load-bearing.
  2. [Sec. III C / Table II] Sec. III C and Table II: after obtaining the Möbius form, the authors switch to an algebraic closure to produce the ODEs for (Zγ,ζγ). The passage from the infinite Magnus integrals to these closed ODEs is presented as immediate once the form is known; a short verification that the resulting vector field is indeed consistent with the original Kuramoto vector field on each block Cγ (beyond the two elementary examples in SI) would strengthen the reduction claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1] Fig. 1 caption and panels (c)–(d): the eigenvalue and singular-value plots are shown but never discussed in the text; either remove them or add a brief remark on what spectral features (if any) are expected from the block structure of Table I.
  2. [Eqs. (12), (23)] Notation: the same symbol hoγ is used both for the interaction sum (Eq. 12) and, later, for the time-dependent coefficient qγ(t). A consistent distinction would improve readability.
  3. [SI SII] SI, Remark S2: the sign discrepancy with Matone’s original formula is noted but not resolved; a one-line verification that the chosen sign yields the correct PSU(1,1) action would be helpful.
  4. [Introduction / Conclusion] References: the recent literature on higher-dimensional and non-Abelian WS transforms (Lohe, Cestnik–Martens, etc.) is cited, yet a short comparison of the present operator route with those geometric approaches would place the contribution more clearly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: sequential reuse of authors' prior motif conditions as model inputs, with independent operator derivation of the reduced system and WS map via external Magnus/Matone tools.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract; Sec. II (Construction); conditions 1.1-1.4 and 2.1-2.3]
    "In our previous work [arXiv:2504.06248], we adopted Koopman theory to link the existence of different constants of motion to the presence of specific network motifs of Kuramoto oscillators. ... Using these conditions, which we will recall and adapt in the following subsections, we aim to construct a modular random graph..."

    The existence conditions for monomial eigenfunctions and conserved cross-ratios are taken wholesale from the authors' own prior paper and used to define the random matrix A (Table I). This is a minor sequential self-citation that supplies the model's building blocks; it is not load-bearing for the subsequent operator derivation of the reduced dynamics or the WS map, which proceed independently via Magnus and Matone.

full rationale

The paper's central claims (construction of the random matrix model in Table I from motif conditions, linear change of variables for monomials in Eqs. 17-22, operator derivation of the WS/Möbius form via Magnus expansion + Matone BCH in Sec. III B, and the closed reduced ODEs of dimension N-(m-1)-Σ(nγ-3) in Table II) do not reduce by construction to their inputs. The motif conditions 1.1-1.4 and 2.1-2.3 are imported from the authors' prior arXiv:2504.06248 and used as black-box existence criteria to assemble the graph; this is ordinary sequential work, not a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or self-definitional loop that forces the integration result. Matone's closed BCH formula is an external 2015 result. There is no parameter fitting to data, no ansatz smuggled as prediction, and no renaming of a known empirical pattern. The only mild self-reference is the reuse of the prior motif theorems, which does not make the partial-integration procedure circular. Formal gaps (trajectory-wise Kγ=Rγ(t) identification and uncontrolled Magnus convergence) are correctness issues already flagged by the authors, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard operator-theoretic tools (Koopman generator, Magnus expansion, Matone’s closed BCH formula for sl(2)), on the motif conditions proved in the authors’ prior work, and on the modelling choice that the network is assembled precisely from those motifs. No numerical parameters are fitted to data; the free parameters of the random matrix are generative, not calibrated. The only invented objects are the modular random-graph ensemble itself and the associated partition into monomial, cross-ratio and non-integrable blocks.

free parameters (2)
  • block sizes dτ, nγ, p and number of blocks m, c
    Chosen by the modeller to set the desired number of constants of motion; they are free generative parameters of the random ensemble, not fitted to external data.
  • entries of the random matrices B, β, C, χ, ω
    Drawn from arbitrary distributions (subject only to the algebraic constraints of Table I); again generative, not calibrated.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Magnus expansion converges for the time-dependent Riccati generator Rγ(t) on a positive time interval
    Invoked without a radius-of-convergence estimate (Conclusion and Sec. SIII); required for the exponential map that yields the disk automorphism.
  • standard math Matone’s closed BCH formula holds for the generators of PSU(1,1)
    Taken from Matone (2015) and specialised in Sec. SII; the paper notes that a fully rigorous functional-analytic justification is still needed.
  • domain assumption Necessary and sufficient conditions for monomial eigenfunctions and conserved cross-ratios (Theorems 1 and 3 of arXiv:2504.06248)
    Used as black-box input to construct the blocks of the random matrix (Sec. II).
  • ad hoc to paper The autonomous Koopman generator Kγ coincides with the non-autonomous Riccati generator Rγ(t) along each individual solution curve (Lemma S2)
    The alignment is trajectory-wise only; it is essential for transferring the Magnus expansion back to the original Kuramoto system.
invented entities (1)
  • modular random graph ensemble of Table I (partition into Mτ, Cγ, P blocks with prescribed algebraic constraints) no independent evidence
    purpose: to realise a prescribed number of monomial eigenfunctions and conserved cross-ratios inside a single Kuramoto network
    The ensemble is defined by the authors; no independent empirical or mathematical existence proof outside the construction is given.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 33683 in / 2925 out tokens · 30603 ms · 2026-07-12T08:48:51.255959+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In our previous work [arXiv:2504.06248], we adopted Koopman theory to link the existence of different constants of motion to the presence of specific network motifs of Kuramoto oscillators. Yet, it remains to be shown how the partial integration can be carried out using the Koopman generator and its eigenfunctions. In this paper, we construct a random graph from network motifs that admit Koopman eigenfunctions and conserved quantities, and use it to define a partially integrable Kuramoto model. We perform the partial integration of the introduced model when there are monomial eigenfunctions and conserved cross-ratios, while providing an operator-theoretic derivation of the Watanabe-Strogatz transformation based on Magnus expansion and a recent result on closed forms of the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula [arXiv:1502.06589].

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02617 by Antoine Allard, Benjamin Claveau, Patrick Desrosiers, Vincent Thibeault.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of (a) a modular, directed, weighted, and signed graph of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Summary of the procedure to get the partially integrated system from the model admitting monomial eigenfunctions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Thibeault, B

    V. Thibeault, B. Claveau, A. Allard, and P. Desrosiers, Kuramoto meets Koopman: Constants of motion, sym- metries, and network motifs, arXiv:2504.06248 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Matone, An algorithm for the Baker-Campbell- Hausdorff formula, J

    M. Matone, An algorithm for the Baker-Campbell- Hausdorff formula, J. High Energy Phys.2015, 1

    2015

  3. [3]

    A. T. Winfree,The Geometry of Biological Time (Springer, 2000)

    2000

  4. [4]

    Pikovsky, M

    A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths,Synchroniza- tion: a Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences(Cam- bridge university press, 2003)

    2003

  5. [5]

    S. H. Strogatz,SYNC: How Order Emerges from Chaos in the Universe, Nature, and Daily Life(Hachette Books, 2003)

    2003

  6. [6]

    E. M. Izhikevich,Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience (MIT Press, 2007)

    2007

  7. [7]

    Boccaletti, A

    S. Boccaletti, A. N. Pisarchik, C. I. Del Genio, and A. Amann,Synchronization: From Coupled Systems to Complex Networks(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    A. T. Winfree, Biological rhythms and the behavior of populations of coupled oscillators, J. Theoret. Biol.16, 15 (1967)

    1967

  9. [9]

    Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of cou- pled non-linear oscillators, inInternational Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics(1975) p

    Y. Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of cou- pled non-linear oscillators, inInternational Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics(1975) p. 420

    1975

  10. [10]

    G. B. Ermentrout and N. Kopell, Parabolic bursting in an excitable system coupled with a slow oscillation, SIAM J. Appl. Math.46, 233 (1986)

    1986

  11. [11]

    Watanabe and S

    S. Watanabe and S. H. Strogatz, Integrability of a glob- ally coupled oscillator array, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2391 (1993)

    1993

  12. [12]

    Watanabe and S

    S. Watanabe and S. H. Strogatz, Constants of motion for superconducting Josephson arrays, Physica D74, 197 (1994)

    1994

  13. [13]

    Constants of motion for su- perconductor arrays

    C. J. Goebel, Comment on “Constants of motion for su- perconductor arrays”, Physica D80, 18 (1995)

    1995

  14. [14]

    S. A. Marvel, R. E. Mirollo, and S. H. Strogatz, Identical phase oscillators with global sinusoidal coupling evolve by M¨ obius group action, Chaos19, 043104 (2009)

    2009

  15. [15]

    Stewart, Phase oscillators with sinusoidal coupling in- terpreted in terms of projective geometry, Int

    I. Stewart, Phase oscillators with sinusoidal coupling in- terpreted in terms of projective geometry, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos21, 1795 (2011)

    2011

  16. [16]

    B. Chen, J. R. Engelbrecht, and R. Mirollo, Hyperbolic geometry of Kuramoto oscillator networks, J. Phys. A Math. Theor.50, 355101 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    B. Chen, J. R. Engelbrecht, and R. Mirollo, Dynamics of the kuramoto-sakaguchi oscillator network with asym- metric order parameter, Chaos29, 013126 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    Lipton, R

    M. Lipton, R. Mirollo, and S. H. Strogatz, The Kuramoto model on a sphere: Explaining its low-dimensional dy- namics with group theory and hyperbolic geometry, Chaos31, 093113 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    Pikovsky and M

    A. Pikovsky and M. Rosenblum, Partially integrable dy- namics of hierarchical populations of coupled oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 264103 (2008)

    2008

  20. [20]

    Pikovsky and M

    A. Pikovsky and M. Rosenblum, Dynamics of heteroge- neous oscillator ensembles in terms of collective variables, Physica D240, 872 (2011)

    2011

  21. [21]

    Vlasov, M

    V. Vlasov, M. Rosenblum, and A. Pikovsky, Dynamics of weakly inhomogeneous oscillator populations: Perturba- tion theory on top of Watanabe-Strogatz integrability, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.49, 31LT02 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    M. A. Lohe, The WS transform for the Kuramoto model with distributed amplitudes, phase lag and time delay, J. Phys. A Math. Theor.50, 505101 (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    M. A. Lohe, Higher-dimensional generalizations of the Watanabe-Strogatz transform for vector models of syn- chronization, J. Phys. A Math. Theor.51, 225101 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    M. A. Lohe, Systems of matrix Riccati equations, lin- ear fractional transformations, partial integrability and synchronization, J. Math. Phys.60, 072701 (2019)

    2019

  25. [25]

    M. A. Lohe, On the double sphere model of synchroniza- tion, Physica D412, 132642 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    M. A. Lohe, Exact reduction of synchronized systems in higher-dimensional spaces, Chaos35, 023144 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    M. A. Lohe, Exact linearization and stability of fixed points in synchronization models, J. Phys. Complex.6, 045015 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    Th¨ umler, S

    M. Th¨ umler, S. G. M. Srinivas, M. Schr¨ oder, and M. Timme, Synchrony for weak coupling in the com- plexified Kuramoto model, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 187201 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Cestnik and E

    R. Cestnik and E. A. Martens, Integrability of a globally coupled complex Riccati array: Quadratic integrate-and- fire neurons, phase oscillators, and all in between, Phys. 11 Rev. Lett.132, 057201 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Ott and T

    E. Ott and T. M. Antonsen, Low dimensional behavior of large systems of globally coupled oscillators, Chaos18, 037113 (2008)

    2008

  31. [31]

    D. M. Abrams, R. Mirollo, S. H. Strogatz, and D. A. Wiley, Solvable model for chimera states of coupled os- cillators, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 084103 (2008)

    2008

  32. [32]

    H. Chen, Y. Sun, J. Gao, C. Xu, and Z. Zheng, Order parameter analysis of synchronization transitions on star networks, Front. Phys.12, 120504 (2017)

    2017

  33. [33]

    C. Bick, M. Goodfellow, C. R. Laing, and E. A. Martens, Understanding the dynamics of biological and neural os- cillator networks through exact mean-field reductions: a review, J. Math. Neurosc.10, 1 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    J. R. Engelbrecht and R. Mirollo, Is the Ott-Antonsen manifold attracting?, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023057 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    Cestnik and A

    R. Cestnik and A. Pikovsky, Exact finite-dimensional re- duction for a population of noisy oscillators and its link to Ott-Antonsen and Watanabe-Strogatz theories, Chaos 32, 113126 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    Cestnik and A

    R. Cestnik and A. Pikovsky, Hierarchy of exact low- dimensional reductions for populations of coupled oscil- lators, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 054101 (2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    I. V. Tyulkina, D. S. Goldobin, L. S. Klimenko, and A. Pikovsky, Dynamics of noisy oscillator populations beyond the Ott-Antonsen Ansatz, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 264101 (2018)

    2018

  38. [38]

    D. S. Goldobin, I. V. Tyulkina, L. S. Klimenko, and A. Pikovsky, Collective mode reductions for populations of coupled noisy oscillators, Chaos28, 101101 (2018)

    2018

  39. [39]

    D. S. Goldobin, Relationships between the distribution of Watanabe-Strogatz variables and circular cumulants for ensembles of phase elements, Fluct. Noise Lett.18, 1 (2019)

    2019

  40. [40]

    D. S. Goldobin and A. V. Dolmatova, Ott-Antonsen ansatz truncation of a circular cumulant series, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 033139 (2019)

    2019

  41. [41]

    D. S. Goldobin, M. D. Volo, and A. Torcini, Reduction methodology for fluctuation driven population dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Buend´ ıa, Mesoscopic theory for coupled stochastic os- cillators, Phys

    V. Buend´ ıa, Mesoscopic theory for coupled stochastic os- cillators, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 197201 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    G. A. Gottwald, Model reduction for networks of coupled oscillators, Chaos25, 053111 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    G. A. Gottwald, Finite-size effects in a stochastic Ku- ramoto model, Chaos27, 101103 (2017)

    2017

  45. [45]

    Gfeller and P

    D. Gfeller and P. De Los Rios, Spectral coarse graining of complex networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 038701 (2007)

    2007

  46. [46]

    Gfeller and P

    D. Gfeller and P. De Los Rios, Spectral coarse graining and synchronization in oscillator networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 174104 (2008)

    2008

  47. [47]

    A. C. Kalloniatis, From incoherence to synchronicity in the network Kuramoto model, Phys. Rev. E82, 066202 (2010)

    2010

  48. [48]

    Thibeault, G

    V. Thibeault, G. St-Onge, L. J. Dub´ e, and P. Desrosiers, Threefold way to the dimension reduction of dynamics on networks: An application to synchronization, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043215 (2020)

    2020

  49. [49]

    Timofeyev and A

    T. Timofeyev and A. Patania, Cluster synchronization via graph Laplacian eigenvectors, arXiv:2503.18978v1 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Hong and S

    H. Hong and S. H. Strogatz, Conformists and contrarians in a Kuramoto model with identical natural frequencies, Phys. Rev. E84, 046202 (2011)

    2011

  51. [51]

    Vlasov, Y

    V. Vlasov, Y. Zou, and T. Pereira, Explosive synchroniza- tion is discontinuous, Phys. Rev. E92, 012904 (2015)

    2015

  52. [52]

    Vlasov, A

    V. Vlasov, A. Pikovsky, and E. E. N. Macau, Star-type oscillatory networks with generic Kuramoto-type cou- pling: A model for ”Japanese drums synchrony”, Chaos 25, 123120 (2015)

    2015

  53. [53]

    Vlasov and A

    V. Vlasov and A. Bifone, Hub-driven remote synchro- nization in brain networks, Sci. Rep.7, 10403 (2017)

    2017

  54. [54]

    C. Xu, Y. Sun, J. Gao, W. Jia, and Z. Zheng, Phase transition in coupled star networks, Nonlinear Dyn.94, 1267 (2018)

    2018

  55. [55]

    C. Xu, J. Gao, S. Boccaletti, Z. Zheng, and S. Guan, Synchronization in starlike networks of phase oscillators, Phys. Rev. E100, 012212 (2019)

    2019

  56. [56]

    Z. Chen, Y. Zou, S. Guan, Z. Liu, and J. Kurths, Fully solvable lower dimensional dynamics of Cartesian prod- uct of Kuramoto models, New J. Phys.21, 123019 (2019)

    2019

  57. [57]

    B. O. Koopman, Hamiltonian systems and transforma- tions in Hilbert Space, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A17, 315 (1931)

    1931

  58. [58]

    B. O. Koopman and J. von Neumann, Dynamical systems of continuous spectra, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.18, 301 (1932)

    1932

  59. [59]

    von Neumann, Zur operatorenmethode in der klassis- chen mechanik, Ann

    J. von Neumann, Zur operatorenmethode in der klassis- chen mechanik, Ann. Math.33, 587 (1932)

    1932

  60. [60]

    Carleman, Application de la th´ eorie des ´ equations int´ egrales lin´ eaires aux syst` emes d’´ equations diff´ erentielles non lin´ eaires, Acta Math.59, 63 (1932)

    T. Carleman, Application de la th´ eorie des ´ equations int´ egrales lin´ eaires aux syst` emes d’´ equations diff´ erentielles non lin´ eaires, Acta Math.59, 63 (1932)

    1932

  61. [61]

    Budiˇ si´ c, R

    M. Budiˇ si´ c, R. Mohr, and I. Mezi´ c, Applied koopmanism, Chaos22, 047510 (2012)

    2012

  62. [62]

    S. L. Brunton, M. Budiˇ si´ c, E. Kaiser, and J. N. Kutz, Modern Koopman theory for dynamical systems, SIAM Rev.64, 229 (2022)

    2022

  63. [63]

    Mezi´ c and A

    I. Mezi´ c and A. Banaszuk, Comparison of systems with complex behavior, Physica D197, 101 (2004)

    2004

  64. [64]

    Mezic, Spectral properties of dynamical systems, model reduction and decompositions, Nonlinear Dyn.41, 309 (2005)

    I. Mezic, Spectral properties of dynamical systems, model reduction and decompositions, Nonlinear Dyn.41, 309 (2005)

    2005

  65. [65]

    Mauroy, I

    A. Mauroy, I. Mezi´ c, and J. Moehlis, Isostables, isochrons, and Koopman spectrum for the action-angle representation of stable fixed point dynamics, Physica D 261, 19 (2013)

    2013

  66. [66]

    Mauroy and I

    A. Mauroy and I. Mezi´ c, Global stability analysis us- ing the eigenfunctions of the Koopman operator, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control61, 3356 (2016)

    2016

  67. [67]

    Mezi´ c, Spectrum of the Koopman operator, spectral expansions in functional spaces, and state-space geome- try, J

    I. Mezi´ c, Spectrum of the Koopman operator, spectral expansions in functional spaces, and state-space geome- try, J. Nonlinear Sci.30, 2091 (2019)

    2091

  68. [68]

    Joseph, Koopman-von Neumann approach to quantum simulation of nonlinear classical dynamics, Phys

    I. Joseph, Koopman-von Neumann approach to quantum simulation of nonlinear classical dynamics, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043102 (2020)

    2020

  69. [69]

    Ashwin and J

    P. Ashwin and J. W. Swift, The dynamics ofnweakly coupled identical oscillators, J. Nonlinear Sci.2, 69 (1992)

    1992

  70. [70]

    Golubitsky, I

    M. Golubitsky, I. Stewart, P.-L. Buono, and J. J. Collins, Symmetry in locomotor central pattern generators and animal gaits, Nature401, 693 (1999); M. Golubitsky and I. Stewart,The Symmetry Perspective : From Equi- librium to Chaos in Phase Space and Physical Space (Springer Basel AG, 2002); Nonlinear dynamics on net- works: The groupoid formalism, Bull....

    1999

  71. [71]

    R. Milo, S. Shen-Orr, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, D. Chklovskii, and U. Alon, Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks, Science298, 824 (2002)

    2002

  72. [72]

    Moreno, M

    Y. Moreno, M. V´ azquez-Prada, and A. F. Pacheco, Fit- ness for synchronization of network motifs, Phys. A343, 279 (2004)

    2004

  73. [73]

    Lodato, S

    I. Lodato, S. Boccaletti, and V. Latora, Synchronization properties of network motifs, EPL78, 28001 (2007)

    2007

  74. [74]

    D’Huys, R

    O. D’Huys, R. Vicente, T. Erneux, J. Danckaert, and I. Fischer, Synchronization properties of network mo- tifs: Influence of coupling delay and symmetry, Chaos 18(2008)

    2008

  75. [75]

    Morone and H

    F. Morone and H. A. Makse, Symmetry group factoriza- tion reveals the structure-function relation in the neural connectome of Caenorhabditis elegans, Nat. Commun. 10, 1 (2019); F. Morone, I. Leifer, and H. A. Makse, Fibration symmetries uncover the building blocks of bio- logical networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.117, 8306 (2020); H. A. Makse, P. Bol...

    2019

  76. [76]

    M. T. Angulo, Y. Y. Liu, and J.-J. Slotine, Network mo- tifs emerge from interconnections that favour stability, Nat. Phys.11, 848 (2015)

    2015

  77. [77]

    M. T. Schaub, N. O’Clery, Y. N. Billeh, J. C. Delvenne, R. Lambiotte, and M. Barahona, Graph partitions and cluster synchronization in networks of oscillators, Chaos 26(2016)

    2016

  78. [78]

    M. A. D. Aguiar and A. P. S. Dias, Synchronization and equitable partitions in weighted networks, Chaos28, 073105 (2018)

    2018

  79. [79]

    Sakaguchi and Y

    H. Sakaguchi and Y. Kuramoto, A soluble active rotator model showing phase transitions via mutual entrainment, Prog. Theor. Phys.76, 576 (1986)

    1986

  80. [80]

    F. A. Rodrigues, T. Peron, P. Ji, and J. Kurths, The Kuramoto model in complex networks, Phys. Rep.610, 1 (2016)

    2016

Showing first 80 references.