Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 148 references

A technology plan identifies the gaps and roadmaps that must reach TRL 5 so HWO can deliver 10^-10 contrast, picometer stability, and far-UV sensitivity before Mission Concept Review.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 07:07 UTC pith:2I53WMEL

load-bearing objection Clear, usable TMPO roadmap that turns prior LUVOIR/HabEx/Roman/USORT work into three prioritized tracks with concrete TRL-5 milestones; essential reference, not a discovery paper.

arxiv 2607.02773 v1 pith:2I53WMEL submitted 2026-07-02 astro-ph.IM

The Habitable Worlds Observatory Technology Development Plan

Matthew Bolcar , Feng Zhao , Paul Scowen , Lee Feinberg , Breann Sitarski , Alice Liu , J. Scott Smith , Josh Abel This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords Habitable Worlds Observatorytechnology developmentcoronagraphultra-stable opticsfar-ultravioletTRLexoplanet imagingdetectors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This document is NASA’s official technology development plan for the Habitable Worlds Observatory, the next large space telescope charged with imaging habitable exoplanets and doing transformative astrophysics. It identifies the critical technology gaps, classifies them as new technology or engineering, and organizes them into three tracks: coronagraph systems for starlight suppression, ultra-stable telescope systems for picometer wavefront control, and high-sensitivity ultraviolet and visible instruments. For each lane the plan defines TRL-5 milestones, verification methods, and roadmaps that must be completed before the end-of-decade Mission Concept Review. Gaps are further ranked on a 3-by-3 matrix of importance (threshold, baseline, enhancing) and urgency so resources can be focused where failure would stop the mission. A reader cares because these maturations are presented as the necessary condition for HWO to meet its Decadal Survey science goals.

Core claim

The paper claims that a systematic assessment organized into three technology tracks, each with explicit TRL-5 milestones, testbed roadmaps, and a prioritization matrix, supplies the concrete path for closing the enabling gaps—raw contrast near 10^-10, contrast stability near 10^-11, few-picometer wavefront stability, and far-UV reflectance and detector performance—before the Mission Concept Review.

What carries the argument

The three-track organization (Coronagraph System, Ultra-stable Telescope System, High-sensitivity UV/Visible Instrumentation) paired with the gap-classification flowchart and 3x3 prioritization matrix that ranks each gap by importance and urgency.

Load-bearing premise

The performance budgets and target numbers taken from earlier mission studies will remain the right targets as HWO science goals and architectures continue to evolve.

What would settle it

If the planned EPIC-5, HOST, or Mini-MUST testbeds fail to meet the stated raw-contrast, contrast-stability, or picometer-stability metrics under dynamic, flight-traceable disturbances before Mission Concept Review, the claim that the roadmaps close the enabling gaps is falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Threshold technologies reach TRL 5 in relevant environments before MCR, removing the largest technical show-stoppers from the critical path.
  • Flight system design can allocate error budgets assuming 10^-10 raw contrast and few-picometer wavefront stability are demonstrable.
  • Far-UV mirror coatings and detectors mature enough to support astrophysics down to ~100 nm.
  • Parallel vendor studies and staged testbeds compress the schedule for deformable mirrors, low-noise detectors, and starlight-suppression masks.
  • Emerging technologies remain available as enhancing options for later upgrades or servicing rather than baseline risks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A successful execution of this plan would become the template for co-developing science, architecture, and technology on subsequent Great Observatories.
  • Early testbed results that diverge sharply from the Roman CGI or Decadal heritage baselines would force rapid re-ranking of the lanes well before PDR.
  • The plan’s heavy dependence on simultaneous front-end telescope stability and back-end coronagraph control implies that interface mismanagement between tracks could undo progress in either alone.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is the HWO Technology Maturation Project Office technology development plan. It organizes critical technologies into three tracks (Coronagraph System, Ultra-stable Telescope System, High-sensitivity UV/Visible Instrumentation), classifies gaps via an explicit flowchart, prioritizes them on a 3x3 importance-urgency matrix, and supplies for each lane estimated TRL, driving factors, TRL-5 milestone metrics, verification methods, and development roadmaps grounded in existing or planned testbeds (EPIC-5, Mini-MUST, HOST, IRIS, Keck, etc.). The stated goal is to reach TRL 5 by Mission Concept Review while co-evolving science, architecture, and technology.

Significance. As the official TMPO deliverable for NASA's next flagship, the plan provides a transparent, NASA-standard framework (SP-20205003605 TRL definitions, fidelity tables, gap classification) that the community and agency can use to allocate resources and track progress. Strengths include concrete, falsifiable TRL-5 metrics (e.g., Tables 6-9, 14), explicit recognition of track interfaces, parallel-path risk retirement, and continuous model-validation loops. If executed, it will systematically close the gaps for ~10^-10 contrast, few-picometer stability, and FUV sensitivity to ~100 nm.

minor comments (5)
  1. Several tables and figures are referenced before full definition or appear incomplete in the source (e.g., Table 1 lanes, Fig. 5 prioritization summary, Table 10 detector SOA). Ensure all are complete and self-contained in the final version.
  2. Estimated current TRLs are given as ranges (e.g., 3-5) without a short justification paragraph or citation to the prior roadmap assessments (CTR, USORT, UV SIG). A brief appendix or footnote would improve auditability.
  3. Section 5.7 Deployable Systems is still a placeholder (TRL TBD). Either expand with the current EAC findings or explicitly mark it as deferred until architecture down-select.
  4. Minor inconsistencies in notation (e.g., 10-10 vs 10^{-10}, IW A vs IWA) and a few typographical issues ("L/MOWFS", "mi- crothrusters") should be cleaned for publication.
  5. The dual-use / spin-off paragraph (1.2) is useful but could be shortened or moved to an appendix so the technical plan begins more directly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: a programmatic TRL roadmap that imports notional targets from external prior studies and does not claim first-principles predictions.

full rationale

This document is an engineering technology-development plan, not a derivation of scientific results. Performance targets (e.g., raw contrast ~10^-10, contrast stability ~10^-11, few-picometer WFE, FUV reflectance >60% at 102 nm) are explicitly taken from Roman CGI, LUVOIR, HabEx, Astro2020, CTR, USORT and UV-SIG roadmaps and treated as provisional, iterative inputs that will be refined as science and architectures evolve (Sections 1.1, 2.1, 3, 4.1, 5.1). TRL definitions follow NASA SP-20205003605; prioritization uses a standard importance/urgency matrix; milestones are forward-looking demonstration criteria, not fitted parameters re-labeled as predictions. Self-citations (Feinberg et al. 2026, Scowen et al. 2026) supply architecture context or state-of-the-art summaries and are not load-bearing uniqueness theorems that force the plan’s conclusions. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, or ansatz-smuggling reduction exists. Score 0 is therefore the correct, proportionate finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The plan rests on NASA TRL definitions, heritage performance numbers from Roman CGI/LUVOIR/HabEx, and the assumption that the three-track organization plus parallel development will close gaps before MCR. No free parameters are fitted to new data; the numerical targets are adopted from prior literature. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • notional raw contrast target = ~1e-10 / 1e-11
    Adopted ~10^-10 static raw contrast and ~10^-11 stability (Tables 6–7, Fig. 7) from Roman CGI and large-mission studies; treated as provisional until HWO error budgets freeze.
  • picometer wavefront stability allocation = few pm
    Few-picometer WFE stability over minutes-to-hours (Sections 2.1, 5.2) taken from earlier industry studies and USORT; exact allocation still under development.
  • FUV reflectance thresholds = >60% at 102 nm
    Table 14 values (>60% at 102 nm, >75% at 103 nm, etc.) set by GOMAP TAG community analysis; not re-derived here.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption NASA Technology Readiness Level definitions and fidelity-of-analysis/build criteria from SP-20205003605 apply unchanged to HWO components and systems.
    Tables 2–4 and Section 3.1 explicitly adopt and tailor the NASA Best Practices Guide.
  • domain assumption Heritage performance and lessons from Roman CGI, JWST, LUVOIR, HabEx, and prior roadmaps (CTR, USORT, Cosmic Origins UV SIG) correctly bound the technology gaps for a ~6 m segmented HWO.
    Sections 1.1, 3, 4.1, 5.1 repeatedly cite these studies as the foundation for gap identification and TRL estimates.
  • ad hoc to paper Parallel development of multiple candidate technologies per lane, followed by down-select, will retire risk faster than serial development given the MCR schedule.
    Stated as the general philosophy in Section 4.1.1 and applied across DM, detector, and coating lanes.
  • domain assumption Picometer-level stability and 10^-10 contrast remain necessary and sufficient once science requirements and architectures are finalized.
    Driving factors in Tables 5 and 12 and the notional performance budget (Fig. 7) treat these numbers as fixed targets for TRL-5 planning.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 55200 in / 3216 out tokens · 35772 ms · 2026-07-12T07:07:19.022408+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) is NASA's next large space telescope, selected by the 2020 Decadal Survey in Astronomy and Astrophysics to search for and characterize habitable exoplanets while enabling a broad range of transformative astrophysics. In August 2024, the HWO Technology Maturation Project Office (TMPO) was formed to begin exploring the HWO science, technology, and mission architectures toward a Mission Concept Review (MCR) at the end of the decade. A primary deliverable of this effort is this technology development plan that identifies critical technologies that enable the mission, defines a process for assessing the readiness of those technologies, and outlines a strategy for developing those technologies to a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of 5 before the MCR. This document covers technologies organized along three tracks: Coronagraph System technologies, Ultra-stable Telescope System technologies, and High-sensitivity Ultraviolet and Visible Instrumentation technologies. Additional emerging and enhancing technologies are also discussed.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

148 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s: Highlights of a Decadal Survey

    National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s: Highlights of a Decadal Survey

  2. [2]

    2026 , eprint=

    Habitable Worlds Observatory's Concept and Technology Maturation: Initial Feasibility and Trade Space Exploration , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  3. [3]

    Lawson, P. R. , publisher =. 2000 , version =. doi:2014/16245 , url =

    2000

  4. [4]

    Brown and Kenneth R

    Marc Postman and Thomas M. Brown and Kenneth R. Sembach and Jason Tumlinson and C. Matt Mountain and R. Optical Engineering , number =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  5. [5]

    2019 , eprint=

    The LUVOIR Mission Concept Study Final Report , author=. 2019 , eprint=

    2019

  6. [6]

    2020 , eprint=

    The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory (HabEx) Mission Concept Study Final Report , author=. 2020 , eprint=

    2020

  7. [7]

    Pueyo and Nicholas Siegler , title =

    Pin Chen and Laurent A. Pueyo and Nicholas Siegler , title =. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , editor =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  8. [8]

    2023 , url=

    Ultrastable Observatory Roadmap Team (USORT) Status , author=. 2023 , url=

    2023

  9. [9]

    2024 , eprint=

    Ultraviolet Technology To Prepare For The Habitable Worlds Observatory , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  10. [10]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2016, editor =

    Low order wavefront sensing and control for WFIRST coronagraph. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2016, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2234226 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2234226 2016

  11. [11]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2016, editor =

    Low-signal, coronagraphic wavefront estimation with Kalman filtering in the high contrast imaging testbed. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2016, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2233909 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2233909 2016

  12. [12]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =

    Implementation of a dark zone maintenance algorithm for speckle drift correction in a high contrast space coronagraph. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.8.3.035001 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.8.3.035001

  13. [13]

    Groff and Duncan Liu and Eduardo Bendek and Nicholas Siegler , title =

    Tyler D. Groff and Duncan Liu and Eduardo Bendek and Nicholas Siegler , title =. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , editor =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  14. [14]

    Groff and A

    Tyler D. Groff and A. J. Eldorado Riggs and Brian Kern and N. Jeremy Kasdin , title =. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , number =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  15. [15]

    Subedi and Roser Juanola-Parramon and Tyler D

    Hari B. Subedi and Roser Juanola-Parramon and Tyler D. Groff , title =. Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets IX , editor =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  16. [16]

    Subedi and Roser Juanola-Parramon and Tyler D

    Hari B. Subedi and Roser Juanola-Parramon and Tyler D. Groff and John Hagopian , title =. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , editor =. 2021 , doi =

    2020

  17. [17]

    Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II , year = 2008, editor =

    SPHERE IFS: the spectro differential imager of the VLT for exoplanets search. Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II , year = 2008, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.788366 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1117/12.788366 2008

  18. [18]

    The Keck Planet Imager and Characterizer: A dedicated single-mode fiber injection unit for high resolution exoplanet spectroscopy

    Keck Planet Imager and Characterizer: a dedicated single-mode fiber injection unit for high-resolution exoplanet spectroscopy. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.7.3.035006 , archivePrefix =. 2107.12556 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1117/1.jatis.7.3.035006

  19. [19]

    Detecting Biosignatures in Nearby Rocky Exoplanets using High-Contrast Imaging and Medium-Resolution Spectroscopy with Extremely Large Telescope

    Detecting Biosignatures in Nearby Rocky Exoplanets Using High-contrast Imaging and Medium-resolution Spectroscopy with the Extremely Large Telescope , journal =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad109e , archivePrefix =. 2311.18117 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad109e

  20. [20]

    Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2019, series =

    Development of the WFIRST CGI integral field spectrograph. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2019, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2530731 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2530731 2019

  21. [21]

    Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets VII , year = 2015, editor =

    The CHARIS IFS for high contrast imaging at Subaru. Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets VII , year = 2015, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2188465 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1117/12.2188465 2015

  22. [22]

    High-Contrast Observations with an Integral Field Spectrograph

  23. [23]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2016, editor =

    PISCES: an integral field spectrograph technology demonstration for the WFIRST coronagraph. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2016, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2231671 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2231671 2016

  24. [24]

    Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2017, editor =

    Wavefront control methods for high-contrast integral field spectroscopy. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2017, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2274709 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2274709 2017

  25. [25]

    Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2017, editor =

    Shaped pupil coronagraphy for WFIRST: high-contrast broadband testbed demonstration. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2017, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2272834 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1117/12.2272834 2017

  26. [26]

    Astrobiology , keywords =

    Exoplanet Biosignatures: Understanding Oxygen as a Biosignature in the Context of Its Environment. Astrobiology , keywords =. doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1727 , archivePrefix =. 1705.07560 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1727 2017

  27. [27]

    Prospects for Detecting Oxygen, Water, and Chlorophyll on an Exo-Earth

    Prospects for detecting oxygen, water, and chlorophyll on an exo-Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , keywords =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1407296111 , archivePrefix =. 1404.5337 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1073/pnas.1407296111

  28. [28]

    Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    Characterizing Earth Analogs in Reflected Light: Atmospheric Retrieval Studies for Future Space Telescopes. Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aab95c , archivePrefix =. 1803.06403 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aab95c

  29. [29]

    Reflected spectroscopy of small exoplanets II: characterization of terrestrial exoplanets

    Reflected Spectroscopy of Small Exoplanets II: Characterization of Terrestrial Exoplanets. Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac6b97 , archivePrefix =. 2204.13816 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac6b97

  30. [30]

    Astrobiology , keywords =

    Remote Sensing of Planetary Properties and Biosignatures on Extrasolar Terrestrial Planets. Astrobiology , keywords =. doi:10.1089/15311070260192246 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1089/15311070260192246

  31. [31]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2016, editor =

    Data processing and algorithm development for the WFIRST coronagraph: comparison of RDI and ADI strategies and impact of spatial sampling on post-processing. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2016, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2231581 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2231581 2016

  32. [32]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =

    Toward a near-ultraviolet coronagraph instrument for the Habitable Worlds Observatory. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.12.1.015005 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.12.1.015005

  33. [33]

    Van Gorkom and Ramya M

    Kyle J. Van Gorkom and Ramya M. Anche and Christopher B. Mendillo and Jessica A. Gersh-Range and Justin Hom and Tyler D. Robinson and Mamadou N'Diaye and Nikole K. Lewis and Bruce A. Macintosh and Ewan S. Douglas , title =. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , number =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  34. [34]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2024, editor =

    Achieved maturation of key component-level technologies to enable large, segmented apertures in an ultra-stable optical architecture. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2024, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3014539 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3014539 2024

  35. [35]

    UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts XII , year = 2025, editor =

    Progress on STABLE: development of technologies for ultra-stable systems. UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts XII , year = 2025, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3062173 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3062173 2025

  36. [36]

    UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts XII , year = 2025, editor =

    ULTRA-CT: status report. UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts XII , year = 2025, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3062308 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3062308 2025

  37. [37]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2024, editor =

    Mission architecture trades for the Habitable Worlds Observatory. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2024, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3020201 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1117/12.3020201 2024

  38. [38]

    Applied Optics , year = 2017, month = aug, volume =

    Measurement of picometer-scale mirror dynamics. Applied Optics , year = 2017, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1364/ao.56.006457 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.56.006457 2017

  39. [39]

    Applied Optics , year = 2019, month = apr, volume =

    Sub-picometer dynamic measurements of a diffuse surface. Applied Optics , year = 2019, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1364/AO.58.003156 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.58.003156 2019

  40. [40]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2018, editor =

    JWST optical telescope element center of curvature test. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2018, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2313029 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2313029 2018

  41. [41]

    Tribute to James C

    High-speed interferometry for James Webb Space Telescope testing. Tribute to James C. Wyant: The Extraordinaire in Optical Metrology and Optics Education , year = 2021, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2570872 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2570872 2021

  42. [42]

    doi:10.1364/AO.47.000737 , adsurl =

    Measurement of large cryogenic structures using a spatially phase-shifted digital speckle pattern interferometer , journal =. doi:10.1364/AO.47.000737 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.47.000737

  43. [43]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.02547 , archivePrefix =

    Habitable World Discovery and Characterization: Coronagraph Concept of Operations and Data Post-Processing , journal =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.02547 , archivePrefix =. 2510.02547 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02547

  44. [44]

    Coyle and J

    Laura E. Coyle and J. Scott Knight and Laurent Pueyo and Jonathan Arenberg and Marcel Bluth and Matthew East and Kevin Patton and Matthew R. Bolcar , title =. UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts IX , editor =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  45. [45]

    Eisenhower and Lester M

    Michael J. Eisenhower and Lester M. Cohen and Lee D. Feinberg and Gary W. Matthews and Joel A. Nissen and Sang C. Park and Hume L. Peabody , title =. UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts VII , editor =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  46. [46]

    2016 , url=

    Apertures for Segmented Coronagraph Design and Analysis (SCDA) , author=. 2016 , url=

    2016

  47. [47]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2024, editor =

    Leveraging the Roman coronagraph approach for the HWO error budget. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2024, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3021198 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3021198 2024

  48. [48]

    Harding and Nathan L

    Patrick Morrissey and Leon K. Harding and Nathan L. Bush and Michael Bottom and Bijan Nemati and Andrew Daniel and Bongim Jun and Luz Maria Martinez-Sierra and Niyati Desai and Dave Barry and Rhonda-Topaz Davis and Richard T. Demers and David J. Hall and Andrew Holland and Pete Turner and Brian Shortt , title =. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instrum...

    2023

  49. [49]

    Mann and Christian Marois and William Thompson and Olivier Lardi

    Christopher R. Mann and Christian Marois and William Thompson and Olivier Lardi. Adaptive Optics Systems IX , editor =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  50. [50]

    Will and James R

    Natalia Sanchez-Soria and Scott D. Will and James R. Fienup , title =. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , number =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  51. [51]

    Bush and Patrick Morrissey and Michael Hoenk and Gillian Kyne and Christophe Basset and Andrew U

    Nathan L. Bush and Patrick Morrissey and Michael Hoenk and Gillian Kyne and Christophe Basset and Andrew U. Lamborn and Jocelyn S. Letona and Weibo Chen and David V. Aldrich and Bijan Nemati and Guillermo Gonzalez and Peter Williams and Olivier Daigle and James J. Veilleux and Frederic Doyon and Brian Shortt and Ross Mackie , title =. Journal of Astronomi...

    2025

  52. [52]

    Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation IV , editor =

    Ralf Jedamzik and Peter Hartmann and Thomas Westerhoff , title =. Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation IV , editor =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  53. [53]

    Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation , year = 2022, series =

    Roman Space Telescope: demonstration of integrated thermal control system test for the optical telescope assembly. Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation , year = 2022, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2633215 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2633215 2022

  54. [54]

    J. Scott Smith and Lisa Bartusek and Tom Casey and Dave Content and Christine Cottingham and Rob Egerman and Joe Marzouk and James Mondello and Bonnie Patterson and Perry Voyer and Dave Smith Jr. and Tony Whitman and Timothy Wilson , title =. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , editor =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  55. [55]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2022, editor =

    Roman optical telescope assembly (OTA) build and integration progress. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2022, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2630105 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2630105 2022

  56. [56]

    High-contrast imager for complex aperture telescopes (HiCAT): 11. System-level demonstration of the Apodized Pupil Lyot Coronagraph with a segmented aperture in air

    High-contrast imager for complex aperture telescopes (HiCAT): 11. System-level demonstration of the apodized pupil Lyot coronagraph with a segmented aperture in air. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2024, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3018037 , archivePrefix =. 2409.12931 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1117/12.3018037 2024

  57. [57]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2026: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2026, series =

    Integral field spectroscopy with a Habitable Worlds Observatory coronagraph instrument: design concepts and technology demonstrations. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2026: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2026, series =

    2026

  58. [58]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation I: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter , editor =

    Marc Albanese and Allan Wirth and Andrew Jankevics and Tom Gonsiorowski and Catherine Ohara and Fang Shi and Mitchell Troy and Gary Chanan and Scott Acton , title =. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation I: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter , editor =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  59. [59]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Keck Observatory as an HWO Testbed: validating wavefront sensing and control schemes on a large segmented aperture in parallel with high-contrast science. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.01585 , archivePrefix =. 2511.01585 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.01585

  60. [60]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , editor =

    David Redding and Scott Basinger and Siddarayappa Bikkannavar and Brandon Dube and Andrew Kee and John Lou and Carl Nissly and Catherine Ohara and Philip Poon and Erkin Sidick and Jonathan Tesch and Mitchell Troy , title =. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , editor =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  61. [61]

    2026 , URL =

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2026: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , editor =. 2026 , URL =

    2026

  62. [62]

    Scott Knight and Laura Coyle , title =

    Benjamin Cromey and Brian Hicks and Jeremy Shugrue and Joseph Ho and Courtney Owen and Austin Grossman and Natalie Fan and Brooke Walters and J. Scott Knight and Laura Coyle , title =. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , editor =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  63. [63]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , editor =

    Jacob Wirth and James Mason and Alison Nordt , title =. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , editor =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  64. [64]

    American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , year = 2026, series =

    Disturbance-Free Payload Advancements: Next-Generation Vibration Isolation Technology for HWO. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , year = 2026, series =

    2026

  65. [65]

    Quijada, Manuel , title =

  66. [66]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =

    Far-ultraviolet optical properties and performance of physical vapor deposited aluminum mirrors protected with XeLiF and XeMgF _ 2. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.11.4.042209 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1117/1.jatis.11.4.042209

  67. [67]

    Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation VI , year = 2024, editor =

    Stability of XeF _ 2 passivated Al plus LiF as possible coating for HWO. Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation VI , year = 2024, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3018471 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3018471 2024

  68. [68]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , year = 2024, editor =

    Enhanced far ultra-violet optical properties of physical vapor deposited aluminum mirrors through fluorination. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , year = 2024, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3021592 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3021592 2024

  69. [69]

    Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation , year = 2022, series =

    Advanced Al mirrors protected with LiF overcoat to realize stable mirror coatings for astronomical telescopes. Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation , year = 2022, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2630585 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1117/12.2630585 2022

  70. [70]

    UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXIV , year = 2025, editor =

    INFUSE II: science and upgrades for the second launch of the far ultraviolet integral field spectrograph. UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXIV , year = 2025, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3064748 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3064748 2025

  71. [71]

    UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXIV , year = 2026, editor =

    Exposure of highly reflective Far-Ultraviolet Coatings to LEO environment for TRL advancement for the Habitable Worlds Observatory. UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXIV , year = 2026, editor =

    2026

  72. [72]

    Applied Optics , year = 2000, month = apr, volume =

    Correction Masks for Thickness Uniformity in Large-Area Thin Films. Applied Optics , year = 2000, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1364/AO.39.001602 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.39.001602 2000

  73. [73]

    Astronomische Nachrichten , year = 2023, month = oct, volume =

    Fully depleted charge - coupled device design and technology development. Astronomische Nachrichten , year = 2023, month = oct, volume =. doi:10.1002/asna.20230072 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1002/asna.20230072 2023

  74. [74]

    PRL , keywords =

    Single-Electron and Single-Photon Sensitivity with a Silicon Skipper CCD. PRL , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.131802 , archivePrefix =. 1706.00028 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.131802

  75. [75]

    IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices , keywords =

    Single-Quantum Measurement With a Multiple-Amplifier Sensing Charge-Coupled Device. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices , keywords =. doi:10.1109/TED.2024.3392711 , archivePrefix =. 2308.09822 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.1109/ted.2024.3392711 2024

  76. [76]

    Sixteen Multiple-Amplifier Sensing Charge-Coupled Devices and Characterization Techniques Targeting the Next Generation of Astronomical Instruments

    Sixteen multiple-amplifier sensing charge-coupled devices and characterization techniques targeting the next generation of astronomical instruments. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.11.1.011203 , archivePrefix =. 2405.19505 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1117/1.jatis.11.1.011203

  77. [77]

    Multi-Amplifier Sensing Charge-coupled Devices for Next Generation Spectroscopy

    Multi-amplifier Sensing Charge-coupled Devices for Next Generation Spectroscopy. PASP , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad716c , archivePrefix =. 2406.06472 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad716c

  78. [78]

    IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices , keywords =

    Design and Simulation of a Highly Sensitive Charge Detector With Nondestructive Readout Mode for Fully Depleted Thick CCDs. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices , keywords =. doi:10.1109/TED.2022.3233288 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1109/ted.2022.3233288 2022

  79. [79]

    First results on SiSeRO (Single electron Sensitive Read Out) devices -- a new X-ray detector for scientific instrumentation

    First results on SiSeRO devices: a new x-ray detector for scientific instrumentation. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.8.2.026006 , archivePrefix =. 2112.05033 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1117/1.jatis.8.2.026006

  80. [80]

    Hoenk and Todd J

    Michael E. Hoenk and Todd J. Jones and Matthew R. Dickie and Frank Greer and Thomas J. Cunningham and Edward R. Blazejewski and Shouleh Nikzad , title =. Infrared Systems and Photoelectronic Technology IV , editor =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

Showing first 80 references.