Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Data-driven multi-objective optimization for alloy recycling using factorization machines and quantum annealing

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Factorization machines plus quantum annealing can find non-convex Pareto-optimal scrap alloy mixes, matching classical annealing up to 25 qubits.

desk verdict Solid first hardware demo of DDTS-enabled FM+QA for non-convex multi-objective scrap-alloy design; binary encoding matches SA up to 25 qubits, with model-proxy limits already owned by the authors. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.03208 v2 pith:JXUXBVQF submitted 2026-07-03 cond-mat.mtrl-sci quant-ph

Thomas Plehn , Katrin Bugelnig , Silvana Tumminello , Daniel Barragan-Yani , David Melching This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph
keywords QUBO-basedoptimizationmulti-objectiveTchebycheffscalarizationfactorizationmachinealloyrecyclingquantumannealingParetofrontbinaryencoding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a factorization-machine surrogate turned into a QUBO and solved on a quantum annealer can handle multi-objective alloy recycling design, not just single-objective black-box problems. The authors combine the machine with data-driven Tchebycheff scalarization so that each active-learning step can target different trade-offs between yield strength and thermal conductivity, including non-convex parts of the front that weighted-sum scalarization cannot reach. They discretize mixing ratios of up to five commercial aluminum scraps, encode them with binary or one-hot bits, and compare D-Wave Advantage sampling against classical simulated annealing under matched active-learning loops. Binary encoding consistently works better; with it, quantum and classical samplers perform similarly up to 25 logical qubits and both recover well-resolved Pareto fronts that include complex four-alloy mixes. The practical message is that the workflow already functions as a competitive data-driven Pareto sampler on present hardware, while one-hot encodings and larger clique sizes remain limited by embedding noise and constraints.

What carries the argument

Data-driven Tchebycheff scalarization (DDTS): a per-iteration preprocessing step that turns multi-objective property data into a single scalarized objective using randomized preference weights and a utopia point, so that the factorization machine produces a QUBO whose low-energy samples cover both convex and non-convex parts of the Pareto front.

What would settle it

Experimentally measure yield strength and thermal conductivity on a set of the reported Pareto-optimal scrap mixtures (especially the four-alloy non-convex points) under the same additive-manufacturing conditions; if those points are dominated by simpler binary or ternary mixes, or fail to appear on the experimental front, the computational Pareto claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

FM+QA combined with data-driven Tchebycheff scalarization extends QUBO-based active learning to non-convex multi-objective Pareto optimization of scrap-alloy mixtures. On the D-Wave Advantage system, binary-encoded instances up to 25 logical qubits match classical FM+SA performance and resolve non-convex front regions that weighted-sum scalarization misses, while one-hot encoding degrades earlier.

Load-bearing premise

The Thermo-Calc estimates of yield strength and thermal conductivity, tuned for rapid solidification and small grain size, are faithful enough proxies for the real scrap-based additive-manufacturing objectives that the discovered mixes remain meaningful once impurities, phase morphology, and processing history are present.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • QUBO-based active learning can now be applied to multi-objective materials design problems whose Pareto fronts contain non-convex regions.
  • Binary encoding of continuous mixture fractions is the practical default for FM+QA alloy problems; one-hot encodings become unattractive beyond roughly 45–60 logical qubits on present hardware.
  • For scrap-recycling design spaces of the size studied (up to five alloys, ~25 binary variables), quantum annealing is already a usable sampler inside the active-learning loop rather than a theoretical curiosity.
  • Expanding the same loop to more scrap streams or additional property objectives is limited mainly by sampler quality and calibration cost, not by the formulation itself.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Hybrid pipelines that keep QA as a global sampler and hand the returned candidates to classical local search or constraint repair would likely push usable problem sizes past the current 25-qubit binary ceiling without waiting for denser hardware graphs.
  • The same DDTS-FM loop could be reused for other circular-materials problems (e.g., multi-scrap steel or battery-cathode blends) where competing properties are known to produce non-convex fronts.
  • Because each Thermo-Calc evaluation is expensive, the workflow’s value will rise sharply once experimental or higher-fidelity feedback replaces the model oracle, provided sample efficiency remains high.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript assesses an FM+QA active-learning workflow combined with data-driven Tchebycheff scalarization (DDTS) for multi-objective Pareto optimization of Al-alloy scrap mixtures, maximizing model-based yield strength and thermal conductivity. Across SOO benchmarks of increasing scale (3–5 mixing alloys, binary vs one-hot encoding, 9–25 logical qubits) it reports that binary encoding is markedly more efficient, that FM+QA on D-Wave Advantage matches FM+SA under matched settings, and that DDTS recovers non-convex front regions missed by weighted-sum scalarization; a 500-iteration MOO demonstration and a brute-force grid check corroborate the latter. Scaling, embedding overhead, TTS and near-term practical utility of QA are discussed critically.

Significance. If the empirical findings hold, the work usefully extends QUBO-based active learning from single-objective to non-convex multi-objective materials-design problems and supplies concrete hardware benchmarks for a recycling-relevant use case. Strengths include 15-fold SOO repeats with mean/std, hypervolume tracking against FM+SA replicates, open-source code, explicit encoding and embedding details, and an honest appraisal of when current QA hardware remains competitive. These elements give the materials and quantum-optimization communities practical guidance even while true quantum advantage remains prospective.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 2.2 / Fig. 5d] Sec. 2.2 and Fig. 5d: the claim of comparable FM+QA vs FM+SA Pareto performance rests on a single FM+QA trajectory whose hypervolume lies inside the min–max envelope of five FM+SA runs. Given QA hardware stochasticity (embedding, noise, spin-reversal) and the 15-fold statistics used for SOO, additional independent FM+QA replicates are needed to place the MOO equivalence on the same footing; without them the central multi-objective claim remains only suggestive.
  2. [Sec. 2.1.4 / Eq. (1)] Sec. 2.1.4, Eq. (1) and Fig. 4b: TTS is computed under fixed, non-optimized SA schedules and workflow-specific QA anneal counts; the paper correctly notes that the observed QA advantage for N≤16 is therefore not a general solver benchmark. The abstract and conclusions nevertheless advertise a “critical perspective” on sizes at which QA “may become practically beneficial.” Either a limited SA annealing-time sweep on representative QUBOs or a sharper statement that no asymptotic crossover is claimed is required so that the TTS discussion does not over-reach the data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 1 / Sec. 2.1.3] Table 1 lists 3.1 % resolution for model L while Sec. 2.1.3 writes “3.2 %”; reconcile the numbers.
  2. [Fig. 2] Fig. 2 caption swaps “cold/warm colors” relative to the text description of binary vs one-hot; correct for consistency.
  3. [Sec. 2.1.2–2.1.3] The local-search spin-flip mechanism is introduced only for one-hot runs (Sec. 2.1.2) yet is later applied also to binary L (Sec. 2.1.3); state the policy uniformly.
  4. Minor typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., “F our alloy mixtures”, “3D spin glass”, missing spaces around units); a careful proof-read would remove them.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: empirical FM+QA/SA active-learning assessment with external Thermo-Calc labels; only minor methodological self-citation of DDTS.

  1. other [Abstract; Introduction (DDTS paragraph); Sec. 2.2; Methods 4.4; Ref. [23]]
    "To address the non-convex nature of the Pareto front, we employ the recently proposed data-driven Tchebycheff scalarization (DDTS) scheme. ... While the DDTS scheme for multi-objective optimization with FM+QA was developed in our previous work [23], its implementation on quantum annealing hardware has not yet been demonstrated."

    Methodological self-citation: DDTS is taken from the authors’ prior preprint rather than re-derived. This is not load-bearing circularity—the paper’s claims are empirical (QA vs SA, encodings, Pareto coverage vs weighted-sum) and are validated against Thermo-Calc labels and a brute-force grid, not by definition of DDTS. Included only as the single minor self-reference pattern present.

full rationale

The paper’s load-bearing claims are empirical performance assessments (SOO convergence across encodings/scales, TTS, MOO Pareto hypervolume, binary vs one-hot, QA vs SA), not first-principles derivations. The active-learning loop trains an FM on Thermo-Calc-labeled mixtures, solves the resulting QUBO, and re-labels candidates with the same external computational oracle; success metrics (global YS optimum of pure Alloy 1, hypervolume, brute-force grid confirmation of non-convex quaternary mixtures) are measured against those labels, not against the FM surrogate itself. DDTS is a preprocessing scalarization (utopia point and randomized weights refreshed each iteration) that does not force the front by construction—the paper contrasts it with weighted-sum scalarization, which fails on the non-convex region. The sole self-citation of note is reuse of the authors’ prior DDTS formulation [23] as a method; the present work’s contribution is hardware implementation and alloy-recycling assessment, independently demonstrated in Figs. 2–6. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported to forbid alternatives, and no ansatz is smuggled that equates output to input. Score 1 reflects only that minor non-load-bearing self-citation of the scalarization method.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard QUBO/Ising and factorization-machine mathematics, domain modeling choices for alloy properties and encodings, and a small set of free parameters (anneal counts, constraint penalties, FM rank, SA sweeps) that are calibrated rather than derived. No new physical entities are postulated; DDTS is reused from prior work by the same group.

free parameters (5)
  • QA anneal count and spin-reversal count = 20k–45k anneals; 40–45 transformations
    Chosen per sub-study (20k–45k anneals, 40–45 spin reversals) to match FM+SA progress; not derived from first principles.
  • Constraint penalty strength λ and annealing time = 2.5 µs annealing time (selected)
    Calibrated on three representative QUBOs drawn from prior FM+SA runs; annealing time fixed at 2.5 µs after scan.
  • FM factorization rank and regularization = rank=6; Optuna-tuned regs
    Rank fixed at 6; regularizers tuned by Optuna on validation split each iteration.
  • SA runs and sweeps = 1000 runs, 2000 sweeps
    Held fixed at 1000 runs / 2000 sweeps for all FM+SA baselines; schedule auto-set by Ocean default.
  • Mixture fraction resolution / qubit budget = 3–5 bits per fraction (binary)
    Coarse resolutions (14.3 %, 6.6 %, 3.1 %) chosen to keep QUBOs embeddable on Advantage hardware.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption A second-order factorization machine is an adequate surrogate for the scalarized objective over the discrete mixture space.
    Invoked throughout Sec. 4.4; FM expressivity is limited to pairwise interactions.
  • domain assumption Thermo-Calc TCAL7 property models (Deschamps precipitation, Walbrühl solid-solution, Hall–Petch, freeze-in TC) supply ground-truth labels for YS and TC under additive-manufacturing-like conditions.
    Sec. 4.1–4.2; paper acknowledges missing morphology and impurity effects.
  • domain assumption Soft quadratic constraints with tuned λ enforce sum-to-one mixture fractions (and one-hot feasibility when used).
    Eq. (7) and surrounding text in Sec. 4.4.
  • standard math QUBO/Ising ground-state sampling via quantum annealing or simulated annealing yields useful next candidates for active learning.
    Standard FM+QA premise (Kitai et al., Tamura et al.).
  • ad hoc to paper Data-driven Tchebycheff scalarization with refreshed utopia point and random weights recovers non-convex Pareto regions.
    Taken from authors' prior work [23]; applied as dataset preprocessing (Eqs. 5–6).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Data-driven multi-objective optimization for alloy recycling using factorization machines and quantum annealing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JXUXBVQF

@misc{pith2026260703208,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Data-driven multi-objective optimization for alloy recycling using factorization machines and quantum annealing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JXUXBVQF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03208}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum annealing has the potential to provide practical quantum advantage for complex optimization tasks. Here, we present a systematic assessment of an integrated factorization-machine and quantum-annealing workflow (FM+QA) for a technologically relevant application: multi-objective Pareto optimization in metal up-cycling through alloy design. To address the non-convex nature of the Pareto front, we employ the recently proposed data-driven Tchebycheff scalarization (DDTS) scheme. Our results show that FM+QA extends the applicability of QUBO-based optimization to data-driven materials discovery problems with multiple competing objectives. In particular, we analyze the scaling behavior of the approach and compare quantum annealing with classical simulated annealing using both regular binary encoding and one-hot encoding. Finally, we provide a critical perspective on the problem sizes and encoding strategies for which quantum-annealing-based optimization may become practically beneficial in the near future.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03208 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Factorization machine quantum-annealing (FM+QA) methodology with data-driven Tcheby [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Yield strength maximization in the 3 mixing alloy models S1 (left) and S2 (right). Accumu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Yield strength maximization in the 4 mixing alloy models M1 (left) and M2 (right). Accumu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) Yield strength maximization in the 5 mixing alloy model L1. Accumulated best mixtures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: MOO results with the FM+QA (a) and FM+SA (b) algorithms. Objective space is spanned [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Alloy recycling mixtures obtained by brute force grid search applying a search space resolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of the 0-1 encoding process of a recycling mixture of five mixing alloys ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Multi-objective active learning FM+QA method for optimizing recycling alloy mixtures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04501-x

    Scheffler, M.et al.FAIR data enabling new horizons for materials research.Nature604, 635–642 (2022). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04501-x. 16

    doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04501-x 2022

  2. [2]

    The materials science behind sustainable metals and alloys.Chemical Reviews123, 2436–2608 (2023)

    Raabe, D. The materials science behind sustainable metals and alloys.Chemical Reviews123, 2436–2608 (2023). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00799. [3]https://www.iea.org/reports/aluminium. [Accessed 08-01-2024]

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00799 2023

  3. [3]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2023.2196242

    Gao, J.et al.Accelerated discovery of high-performance al-si-mg-sc casting alloys by integrating active learning with high-throughput calphad calculations.Science and Technology of Advanced Materials24, 2196242 (2023). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2023.2196242

    work page doi:10.1080/14686996.2023.2196242 2023

  4. [4]

    URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10115028/v1

    Bugelnig, K.et al.An al-si-cu-mg-ni alloy for additive manufacturing from scrap mixtures: A combined high-throughput computational and 4d experimental proof of concept (2026). URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10115028/v1. Preprint, posted June 23, 2026

    work page doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10115028/v1 2026

  5. [5]

    M., Galarraga, H., Marquez, I

    Sanchez, J. M., Galarraga, H., Marquez, I. & de Cortazar, M. G. High-throughput calphad-guided design and experimental study on the development of a novel multicomponent as-cast al-si-cu-zn-fe-mn-mg based alloy through the direct melting of post-consumer scrap.Journal of Alloys and Compounds1015, 178888 (2025). URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...

    2025

  6. [6]

    D.et al.Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation.Science388, 199–204 (2025)

    King, A. D.et al.Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation.Science388, 199–204 (2025). URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.ado6285

    doi:10.1126/science.ado6285 2025

  7. [7]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-025-01020-1

    Kim, S.et al.Quantum annealing for combinatorial optimization: a benchmarking study.npj Quantum Information11(2025). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-025-01020-1

    doi:10.1038/s41534-025-01020-1 2025

  8. [8]

    & Lidar, D

    Munoz-Bauza, H. & Lidar, D. Scaling advantage in approximate optimization with quantum anneal- ing.Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 160601 (2025). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134. 160601

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134 2025

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    & Nishimori, H

    Kadowaki, T. & Nishimori, H. Quantum annealing in the transverse ising model.Phys. Rev. E58, 5355–5363 (1998). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5355

    1998 doi

  2. [10]

    G., Lechner, W., Nishimori, H

    Hauke, P., Katzgraber, H. G., Lechner, W., Nishimori, H. & Oliver, W. D. Perspectives of quantum annealing: methods and implementations.Reports on Progress in Physics83, 054401 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ab85b8

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    & Schmitt, S

    Yarkoni, S., Raponi, E., B¨ ack, T. & Schmitt, S. Quantum annealing for industry applications: introduction and review.Reports on Progress in Physics85, 104001 (2022). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6633/ac8c54

    2022

  4. [12]

    Factorization machines

    Rendle, S. Factorization machines. In2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining(2010). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2010.127

    2010 doi

  5. [13]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0275450

    Tamura, R.et al.Black-box optimization using factorization and ising machines.Applied Physics Reviews 13, 021307 (2026). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0275450

    2026 doi

  6. [14]

    Kitai, K.et al.Designing metamaterials with quantum annealing and factorization machines.Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013319 (2020). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013319

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    URLhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01969

    Kim, S.et al.High-performance transparent radiative cooler designed by quantum computing.ACS Energy Letters7, 4134–4141 (2022). URLhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01969

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    & Luo, T

    Kim, S., Wu, S., Jian, R., Xiong, G. & Luo, T. Design of a high-performance titanium nitride metastructure-based solar absorber using quantum computing-assisted optimization.ACS Applied Mate- rials and Interfaces15, 40606–40613 (2023). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c08214

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    & Tamura, R

    Urushihara, M., Karube, M., Yamaguchi, K. & Tamura, R. Optimization of core–shell nanoparticles using a combination of machine learning and ising machine.Advanced Photonics Research4, 2370029 (2023). URLhttps://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adpr.202370029

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    & Miura, Y

    Nawa, K., Suzuki, T., Masuda, K., Tanaka, S. & Miura, Y. Quantum annealing optimization method for the design of barrier materials in magnetic tunnel junctions.Physical Review Applied20(2023). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.024044

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.7566/ JPSJ.94.044802.https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.94.044802

    Couzini´ e, Y.et al.Machine learning supported annealing for prediction of grand canonical crystal struc- tures.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan94, 044802 (2025). URLhttps://doi.org/10.7566/ JPSJ.94.044802.https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.94.044802

    2025 doi

  12. [20]

    & Luo, T

    Xu, Z., Shang, W., Kim, S., Lee, E. & Luo, T. Quantum annealing-assisted lattice optimization.npj Computat. Mater.11, 4 (2025). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-024-01505-1

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    & Lee, E

    Hwang, S., Kim, S., Xu, Z., Luo, T. & Lee, E. Higher-order factorization machine for accurate sur- rogate modeling in material design.Scientific Reports15(2025). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-025-19270-6

    2025

  14. [22]

    & Melching, D

    Plehn, T., Barragan-Yani, D., Breitbarth, E., Requena, G. & Melching, D. Progress on data-driven, multi-objective quantum optimization (2025). URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11479.2512.11479. 17

    2025

  15. [23]

    D-Wave Systems Inc

    D-Wave Systems Inc.Ocean Sofware Documentation. D-Wave Systems Inc. URLhttps://docs.ocean. dwavesys.com/

  16. [24]

    D-wave advantage quantum computer (2024)

    D-Wave Systems Inc. D-wave advantage quantum computer (2024). URLhttps://www.dwavesys.com/. Accessed via the Leap quantum cloud service

    2024

  17. [25]

    & Sundman, B

    Andersson, J.-O., Helander, T., H¨ oglund, L., Shi, P. & Sundman, B. Thermo-Calc & DICTRA, compu- tational tools for materials science.CALPHAD26, 273–312 (2002). URLhttps://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0364591602000378

    2002

  18. [26]

    [Accessed 24-04-2026]

    Thermodynamic Databases - Thermo-Calc Software — thermocalc.com.https://thermocalc.com/ products/databases/. [Accessed 24-04-2026]

    2026

  19. [27]

    URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10

    Bugelnig, K.et al.Revealing the effect of local connectivity of rigid phases during deformation at high temperature of cast alsi12cu4ni(2, 3)mg alloys.Materials11, 1300 (2018). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 3390/ma11081300

    2018

  20. [28]

    URLhttps://advanced

    Bugelnig, K.et al.3d investigation of damage during strain-controlled thermomechanical fatigue of cast al–si alloys.Advanced Engineering Materials25, 2300339 (2023). URLhttps://advanced. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adem.202300339

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    A., Eskin, D

    Belov, N. A., Eskin, D. G. & Aksenov, A. A. Alloys of the al–mg–si–fe system. InMulticomponent Phase Diagrams: Applications for Commercial Aluminum Alloys, chap. 2, 83–164 (Elsevier Science, 2005)

    2005

  22. [30]

    A., Eskin, D

    Belov, N. A., Eskin, D. G. & Aksenov, A. A.Alloys of the Al-Cu-Mn-(Mg, Fe, Si) System, chap. 5, 159–192 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005). Analyzes phase compositions of important commercial alloys of the 2024-type

    2005

  23. [31]

    A., Eskin, D

    Belov, N. A., Eskin, D. G. & Aksenov, A. A.Multicomponent Phase Diagrams: Applications for Com- mercial Aluminum Alloys, chap. 1 and 5, 13–116, 219–276 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2005)

    2005

  24. [32]

    & Skuli´ c, A

    Miladinovic, S., Stojanovi´ c, B., Gajevi´ c, S., Ivanovi´ c, L. & Skuli´ c, A. A review of hypereutectic aluminum piston materials.IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering1271, 012011 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1271/1/012011

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    F.et al.Defining and detecting quantum speedup.Science345, 420–424 (2014)

    Rønnow, T. F.et al.Defining and detecting quantum speedup.Science345, 420–424 (2014). URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1252319

    2014 doi

  26. [34]

    King, A. D. & Bernoudy, W. Performance benefits of increased qubit connectivity in quantum annealing 3-dimensional spin glasses (2020). URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2009.12479.2009.12479

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Emmerich, M. T. M. & Deutz, A. H. A tutorial on multiobjective optimization: fundamentals and evolutionary methods.Natural Computing17, 585–609 (2018). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11047-018-9685-y

    2018

  28. [36]

    M., Zilinskas, A

    Pardalos, P. M., Zilinskas, A. & Zilinskas, J.Non-Convex Multi-Objective Optimization(Springer Inter- national Publishing, 2017). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61007-8

    2017 doi

  29. [37]

    Pereira, J. a. L. J., Oliver, G. A., Francisco, M. B., Cunha, S. a. S. o. & Gomes, G. F. A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and algorithms in mechanical engineering problems.Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering29, 2285–2308 (2021). URLhttp://dx.doi.o...

    2021

  30. [38]

    & Yamazaki, T

    Ikeda, H. & Yamazaki, T. Multi-objective optimization technique based on qubo and an ising machine. IEEE Access12, 8957–8969 (2024). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3353222

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    & Nishimori, H

    Arai, S., Oshiyama, H. & Nishimori, H. Effectiveness of quantum annealing for continuous-variable optimization.Physical Review A108(2023). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.042403

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    & Jippo, H

    Imanaka, Y., Anazawa, T., Kumasaka, F. & Jippo, H. Optimization of the composition in a composite material for microelectronics application using the ising model.Scientific Reports11(2021). URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81243-2

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    & Aurich, J

    Schworm, P., Wu, X., Klar, M., Glatt, M. & Aurich, J. C. Multi-objective quantum annealing approach for solving flexible job shop scheduling in manufacturing.Journal of Manufacturing Systems72, 142–153 (2024). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.11.015

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    [Accessed 24-04-2026]

    Client Challenge — de.scribd.com.https://de.scribd.com/document/929927790/ TC-Python-API-Programmer-Guide. [Accessed 24-04-2026]

    2026

  35. [43]

    [Accessed 24-04-2026]

    About the Yield Strength Property Model — help.thermocalc.com.https://help.thermocalc.com/ 2026a/content/property_models-gen/yieldstrength-about.htm?{H}ighlight=yield%20strength% 20model. [Accessed 24-04-2026]. 18

    2026

  36. [44]

    & Borgenstam, A

    Walbr¨ uhl, M., Linder, D., ˚Agren, J. & Borgenstam, A. Modelling of solid solution strengthening in multicomponent alloys.Materials Science and Engineering: A700, 301–311 (2017). URLhttps://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921509317307530

    2017

  37. [45]

    & Brechet, Y

    Deschamps, A. & Brechet, Y. Influence of predeformation and ageing of an al–zn–mg alloy—ii. mod- eling of precipitation kinetics and yield stress.Acta Materialia47, 293–305 (1998). URLhttps: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359645498002961

    1998

  38. [46]

    [Accessed 24-04- 2026]

    Thermal Conductivity Model — help.thermocalc.com.https://help.thermocalc.com/2026a/content/ properties/db_thermconduct_model.htm?{H}ighlight=thermal%20conductivity. [Accessed 24-04- 2026]

    2026

  39. [47]

    & Wiedemann, G

    Franz, R. & Wiedemann, G. ¨Uber die W¨ arme-Leitungsf¨ ahigkeit der Metalle.Annalen der Physik165, 497–531 (1853). URLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.18531650802

    doi

  40. [48]

    Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology2(2023)

    Dominguez, F.et al.Encoding-independent optimization problem formulation for quantum computing. Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology2(2023). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frqst.2023. 1229471

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    fastfm: A library for factorization machines.Journal of Machine Learning Research17, 1–5 (2016)

    Bayer, I. fastfm: A library for factorization machines.Journal of Machine Learning Research17, 1–5 (2016). URLhttp://jmlr.org/papers/v17/15-355.html

    2016

  42. [50]

    & Koyama, M

    Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T. & Koyama, M. Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework (2019). URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10902. 19

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.