Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 67 references

ConCeG grows dense, multi-cellular grey-matter phantoms from real neuron and glia shapes so diffusion MRI can be simulated with known ground truth.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 03:30 UTC pith:VI7DQLAI

load-bearing objection Useful GM phantom generator that actually packs multi-cell cortical tissue; dMRI suitability is still only structural, not signal-validated. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03286 v1 pith:VI7DQLAI submitted 2026-07-03 physics.med-ph physics.bio-ph

Contextual Cellular Growth (ConCeG) of neural cells for realistic grey matter tissue generation for diffusion MRI simulations

Charlie Aird-Rossiter , Kadir \c{S}im\c{s}ek , Ma\"eliss Jallais , Derek K. Jones , Lida Kanari , Marco Palombo This is my paper
classification physics.med-ph physics.bio-ph
keywords grey matterdiffusion MRInumerical phantomscellular morphologyMonte Carlo simulationtopological neuron synthesisextracellular spacecortical column
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Grey-matter tissue is a dense, heterogeneous mix of neurons and glia whose shapes strongly shape the diffusion MRI signal, yet most numerical phantoms still use simplified geometries that cannot capture that complexity. ConCeG is a generative pipeline that first extracts morphological and topological statistics from real cellular reconstructions, then grows synthetic cells inside a shared three-dimensional network that enforces spatial packing. The result is tunable, multi-cellular volumes that include both intracellular and extracellular compartments and can be meshed for Monte Carlo diffusion simulations. Validation shows that branch statistics, intracellular power spectra, and emergent packing laws match those of biological reference data, and that the meshes run cleanly in diffusion simulators. If the method holds, researchers gain controllable digital grey-matter tissue with which to test how cellular features drive MRI signals and to evaluate biophysical models that currently lack ground-truth substrates of this complexity.

Core claim

Contextual Cellular Growth (ConCeG) produces dense, heterogeneous three-dimensional grey-matter substrates whose cells preserve the branch-order, length, angle, tortuosity and low-frequency spatial-correlation statistics of real neurons and glia, while also generating extracellular geometry whose pore-size and tortuosity distributions are broadly consistent with electron-microscopy tissue; the resulting meshes are compatible with large-scale Monte Carlo diffusion MRI simulation.

What carries the argument

Contextual Cellular Growth: topological neuron synthesis (persistence barcodes plus attractor maps) combined with a spatially constrained Delaunay growth network and local chemoattraction/radius-preservation cost functions that force cells to grow around one another, followed by post-growth optimisation and metaball meshing.

Load-bearing premise

Matching the morphometric distributions and low-frequency power spectra of the same reconstructions used to parameterise growth, together with emergent packing statistics, is taken as sufficient evidence that the phantoms will produce realistic diffusion MRI signals, even though spines and other fine structures are missing and the growth rules remain local and static.

What would settle it

Monte Carlo signals computed on ConCeG cortical columns that systematically fail to reproduce established in-vivo or ex-vivo grey-matter dMRI signatures (time-dependent diffusivity/kurtosis, b-value dependence, or the behaviour of compartment models such as NODDI, SANDI or NEXI) when the same microstructural parameters are matched.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Researchers can generate cortical columns or arbitrary cell mixtures with controlled density, morphology and packing for Monte Carlo diffusion MRI experiments.
  • Biophysical models of grey-matter diffusion can be tested against known ground-truth cellular compositions rather than simplified geometries.
  • Microstructural changes linked to ageing or disease (neuronal loss, dendritic simplification, gliosis) can be introduced systematically and their effect on the MRI signal measured.
  • The same SWC skeletons can be meshed at larger scales or combined with future spine/vessel modules without restarting the growth process.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because growth is driven by barcodes and attractors rather than hand-crafted rules, the same pipeline can be re-parameterised from any new reconstruction library (different cortical areas, species, or pathology) without rewriting the core engine.
  • The observed fractal packing dimension near 1.5 emerges without being imposed, suggesting that local morphological constraints alone may be enough to produce the multi-scale organisation reported in real grey matter.
  • Adding modular spines or boutons after growth would allow controlled tests of which sub-cellular features are actually visible to practical diffusion acquisitions, closing the gap between morphometric fidelity and signal fidelity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces ConCeG, a generative pipeline that places somata by user-specified density and cell-type composition, then grows dendrites/axons on a static Delaunay navigation graph using topological persistence barcodes, attractor maps, and radius-constrained chemoattraction costs (Eqs. 1–4), with optional fibre collapse and post-growth sphere optimisation. Outputs are SWC skeletons converted to watertight meshes for Monte Carlo dMRI. Validation compares synthetic vs real branch order/length/angle/tortuosity (Fig. 6), intracellular power spectra (Fig. 7), composition scaling (fractal dim ~1.5; Fig. 8), and ECS pore size/tortuosity vs MICrONS (Fig. 9). An exemplar cortical column and PGSE simulations (Fig. 10) illustrate layer-wise signal differences driven by soma volume fraction. The central claim is that these substrates are biologically grounded and suitable for large-scale GM dMRI simulation.

Significance. If the structural and packing fidelity hold under broader validation, ConCeG would fill a genuine gap: existing phantom generators are largely WM-centric or single-cell, whereas GM requires multi-cellular packing with realistic ECS. Strengths include explicit use of topological barcodes and attractor maps from open reconstructions, multi-scale checks (morphometry, structure factor, fractal composition, ECS metrics), near-linear compute scaling, and planned code release. The framework is parameterised for controlled perturbation of density, morphology, and composition, which is valuable for testing how neuronal loss, dendritic regression, or gliosis affect dMRI biomarkers. The missing piece is signal-level validation against real GM dMRI; structural match alone does not yet secure the suitability claim for diffusion physics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §3.7; Fig. 10; Discussion] The central claim that substrates are 'suitable for large scale diffusion MRI simulation' (Abstract; Conclusion) is not secured by the present evidence. Morphometric and low-frequency power-spectrum agreement (Figs. 6–7) is partly by construction: barcodes, attractors, diameters, and angles are taken from the same NeuroMorpho/Allen classes later used for comparison (§2.2–2.7). Emergent packing (Figs. 8–9) is more independent, but Monte Carlo results (§3.7, Fig. 10) are only exemplar PGSE curves (Δ=13 ms, δ=8 ms) showing layer differences driven by soma VF. There is no comparison to in-vivo/ex-vivo GM time-dependent diffusivity, kurtosis, or exchange-sensitive signatures (NODDI/SANDI/NEXI), which the Discussion itself flags as future work. Either add such a comparison or reframe the claim as a structural generator with demonstrated MC compatibility, not yet validated for realistic GM dMRI
  2. [§3.6; Fig. 9; Discussion] ECS validation (Fig. 9) shows mean pore size and tortuosity broadly similar to MICrONS, but ConCeG has an extended large-pore tail and lower tortuosity. The Discussion offers EM shrinkage or limited node density as explanations, yet no quantitative packing density, ECS volume fraction, or sensitivity to node density / cost weight f / collapse distance g0 is reported for the compared substrates. Without those numbers and a sensitivity analysis, it is unclear whether the ECS geometry is robust enough for diffusion and exchange modelling, which depend strongly on pore-size distribution and path tortuosity.
  3. [§4.2; Fig. 6] Distributional comparisons (Fig. 6) are described as 'strong agreement' / 'closely match' without quantitative statistics (KS distances, Wasserstein metrics, or confidence intervals) and without reporting sample sizes (number of real vs synthetic cells per type). Tortuosity for astrocytes is acknowledged as only broadly comparable. For a methods paper whose primary validation is morphometric fidelity, formal statistics and n are load-bearing and should be added.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.4–2.7; §3.1–3.2] Free parameters (λ in Eq. 4, cost weight f in Eq. 3, collapse backtrack g0, node density 2L³, 4:1 pyramidal:interneuron ratio) are introduced but not systematically listed or justified with defaults/sensitivity. A short parameter table would improve reproducibility.
  2. [§3.6] Tortuosity definition (§3.6) states 'Values less than one indicate increasingly convoluted pathways,' which is inverted relative to the usual path-length/Euclidean ≥ 1 convention. Clarify the formula.
  3. [Fig. 4] Figure 4 caption and text refer to layers 3/4/5 meshes from a 100×100×1200 µm column; panel labels and scale bars would help readers assess packing density visually.
  4. [Throughout; §7] Typos and notation: 'ral grey matter' (§3.5); 'segmentation's'; 'S ¸im¸ sek' encoding; arXiv id 2607.03286 looks nonstandard. Code URL is promised post-publication—consider a temporary archive for review.
  5. [Introduction] Related GM-oriented generators (Palombo et al. 2019 generative cells; Ianus et al. 2021; SpinDoctor neuron module; Caterpillar glia) are cited; a short explicit comparison table of capabilities (multi-cell packing, ECS, spines, scale) would sharpen the novelty claim.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Morphometric match (branch order/length/angle) is partly by construction from the same barcodes and angle distributions used to drive growth; emergent packing, ECS, and power-spectrum checks are more independent.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract; §2.2 Morphological Characterisation; §2.7 Branching criteria (Eq. 4); §3.3 Structural Comparison; Results 4.2 / Fig. 6]
    "Synthetic cells are generated using morphological and topological characteristics derived from biological reconstructions. We validate the framework through comparisons of structural features with real cellular data, demonstrating strong agreement in branch order, length, angle, and tortuosity distributions. ... Branching behavior is governed by the assigned persistence barcode. ... a branching angle is drawn from the cell-type specific distribution learned from real reconstructions ... P(bifurcation|pl)=e^λ(pl−ili)"

    Branch order, initiation/termination lengths and branching angles are taken directly from the real-cell barcodes and angle histograms that parameterize growth. Matching those same distributions on the synthetic cells is therefore expected by construction rather than an independent test of morphological fidelity. (Tortuosity and packing statistics remain freer and are not forced.)

full rationale

ConCeG is a data-informed generative method, not a first-principles derivation of dMRI signals. Persistence barcodes, attractor maps, branch-angle distributions, and diameters are extracted from NeuroMorpho/Allen reconstructions (§2.2) and then used to drive branching initiation/termination, angles, and target lengths (§2.4, §2.7, Eq. 4). The subsequent structural comparison (§3.3, Fig. 6, Results 4.2) therefore recovers, by design, the same branch-order, path-length and angle statistics that were supplied as inputs; only tortuosity is left free and still shows partial mismatch for astrocytes. Power spectra, composition power-law (vs external [59]), ECS pore/tortuosity (vs MICrONS), and exemplar Monte-Carlo curves are not forced by those inputs and constitute independent content. No uniqueness theorem, self-citation chain, or fitted constant is renamed as a prediction of the diffusion signal itself. The circularity is therefore limited to the expected tautology of generative-model morphometrics and does not collapse the central claim that the substrates are usable for Monte-Carlo dMRI simulation. Score 3 reflects one clear by-construction validation step without rendering the whole pipeline circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 4 axioms · 2 invented entities

The method rests on domain assumptions that simplified chemoattraction plus barcode-driven branching on a static Delaunay graph yields diffusion-relevant geometry; free weights control navigation and branching; morphological dictionaries from open reconstructions define targets. No new physical particles; the invented machinery is algorithmic (attractor maps, growth network, collapse rule).

free parameters (5)
  • bifurcation rate λ
    Controls P(bifurcation|pl)=exp(λ(pl−ili)); free parameter of the branching rule, not fixed by data uniqueness.
  • cost weight f
    Balances attractor term lt vs radius constraint lr in total cost l=lt+f lr; chosen to trade targeting vs radius preservation.
  • fibre-collapse backtrack distance g0
    Ad hoc recovery distance when projections trap on the static graph.
  • node density (e.g. 2L³)
    Hand-chosen graph resolution that trades fidelity vs compute; limits fine morphology especially for glia.
  • pyramidal:interneuron ratio 4:1
    Taken from literature estimates and imposed as composition prior for the column.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Topological persistence barcodes with path-length filtration plus empirical branch-angle/attractor maps suffice to reconstruct diffusion-relevant arbor statistics.
    Invoked throughout Morphological Characterisation and Branching criteria; inherits Kanari et al. synthesis assumptions.
  • ad hoc to paper Local chemoattraction and radius-constrained navigation on a static Delaunay graph, with optional collapse, adequately approximate biological packing constraints for ECS geometry.
    Network Navigation and Synthetic Growth; authors note growth is only locally informed.
  • domain assumption Periodic boundary re-entry preserves morphology and packing without distorting diffusion-relevant structure when tiled.
    Boundary conditions section; standard phantom practice but unvalidated for long-range GM arbors.
  • ad hoc to paper Matching morphometry and low-frequency structure factor implies suitability for Monte Carlo dMRI of GM.
    Stated aim and Discussion; paper itself flags that morphometry does not guarantee realistic DW signals.
invented entities (2)
  • ConCeG growth pipeline (contextual multi-cell GM generator) no independent evidence
    purpose: Produce tunable dense multi-cellular GM meshes with intra/extra-cellular compartments for dMRI simulation.
    Named framework combining barcode synthesis, constrained network growth, optimization, and meshing; algorithmic rather than physical entity.
  • Attractor-point maps from terminal projections on the unit sphere no independent evidence
    purpose: Drive directional growth of synthetic projections to mimic chemical gradients.
    Constructed from reconstructions; not independently measured guidance fields.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 20280 in / 3116 out tokens · 29775 ms · 2026-07-12T03:30:55.436611+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Accurate interpretation of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) signals in grey matter (GM) remains challenging due to the complex, heterogeneous, and densely packed cellular environment. Numerical phantoms provide a controlled framework for investigating the relationship between microstructure and diffusion signals, yet existing approaches often lack the morphological realism and multi-cellular organisation required to faithfully represent GM tissue. In this work, we introduce Contextual Cellular Growth (ConCeG), a generative framework for creating individual cells or constructing dense, three-dimensional, multi-cellular GM substrates informed by real neuronal and glial morphologies. The method combines topological neuron synthesis with a spatially constrained growth network, allowing for the controlled generation of heterogeneous cellular environments with realistic intra- and extracellular compartments. Synthetic cells are generated using morphological and topological characteristics derived from biological reconstructions. We validate the framework through comparisons of structural features with real cellular data, demonstrating strong agreement in branch order, length, angle, and tortuosity distributions. Power spectrum analysis further shows that both intracellular compartments reproduce the spatial correlations observed in biological tissue. Together, these results show ConCeG provides a biologically grounded framework for generating grey matter substrates suitable for large scale diffusion MRI simulation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03286 by Charlie Aird-Rossiter, Derek K. Jones, Kadir \c{S}im\c{s}ek, Lida Kanari, Ma\"eliss Jallais, Marco Palombo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Visualisation of ConCeG output. ConCeG uses a morphological dictionary to generate individual neuronal morphologies (A, example pyramidal (blue) and basket (red) cell) and user-defined cell compositions to generate heterogeneous substrates (B, a substrate containing pyramidal (blue) and basket (red) cells at a 4:1 ratio). Combining a cortical layer-specific morphological dictionary with a soma density prof… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Visualisation of boundary navigation. A. shows the initial voxel configuration with a branch starting from the bottom left, growing towards an attractor that lies beyond the voxel space. B.-D. depict how active branches navigate crossing boundary’s. When a boundary is met the active branch re￾entrees the voxel space via the corresponding mirrored boundary node. Active branches are free to cross boundaries … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Visualisation of topologically informed branching, A. Initial network configuration, with a soma on the left and the bar code for the projec￾tion is shown below. B. Initial growth, as the projection navigates the network its path length increases, increasing the probability of initiating the second branch seen in the bar code (when the current path length is equal to the initi￾ation length of a branch the … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualisation of complete cortical column, showing exemplar cells (one basket and one pyramidal cell for each cortical layer), and meshes generated for layers 3, 4, and 5 from the synthetic column. • Branch order distribution • Branch angle distribution • Branch tortuosity • Path length distribution Distributions from synthetic cells were compared against the corresponding dis￾tributions from biological re… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Computational scaling of synthetic substrate generation. A. Time required to generate synthetic substrates as a function of substrate volume, L 3 . B. Log–log representation of generation time versus substrate volume. The fitted power-law relationship yields a scaling exponent of 1.077, indicating near￾linear scaling with substrate volume. For astrocytes, the synthetic tortuosity exhibits a broader distrib… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of real and synthetic cellular characteristics. Exemplar synthetic cells of type pyramidal, basket, and astrocyte, and distri￾butions of branch order, branch length, tortuosity, and branch angle for both real and synthetic cells 4.4 Universal composition As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of real and synthetic intra-cellular power spec￾trum. A. Shows the cross sectional area variation perpendicular to the length of the branch and corresponding power spectrum for real (orange) and ConCeG generated (blue) branches. B. Shows the cross sectional area variation orthog￾onal to the skeleton of the branch and corresponding power spectrum for real (orange) and ConCeG generated (blue) bran… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Power law scaling of cellular composition. A. shows a visualisa￾tion of sub voxel samples (2, 10 and 50 µm side lengths) of the substrate (top) and the largest component contained with in the sub voxel (bottom). B. shows the relationship between largest component volume and sub voxel side length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of real and synthetic extra-cellular space. Visual comparison of real and synthetic extracellular space, alongside the corresponding pore size and tortuosity distributions. 4.6 Simulated signals The generated substrates were found to be fully compatible with Monte Carlo diffusion simulations, demonstrating that the generated cellular geometries can be used for diffusion MRI signal simulations. D… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Simulated signals, showing both intracellular and complete signals for the three meshes generated from the cortical colum seen in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Relationships between neuronal struc- ture and function

    John P Miller and Gwen A Jacobs. Relationships between neuronal struc- ture and function. Technical report, 1984

    1984

  2. [2]

    oxford university press, 2002

    Irwin B Levitan and Leonard K Kaczmarek.The neuron: cell and molecular biology. oxford university press, 2002

    2002

  3. [3]

    Hongkui Zeng and Joshua R. Sanes. Neuronal cell-type classification: Chal- lenges, opportunities and the path forward, 8 2017

    2017

  4. [4]

    Normal aging induces changes in the brain and neurodegeneration progress: Review of the structural, biochemical, metabolic, cellular, and molecular changes, 6 2022

    Jiseon Lee and Hee Jin Kim. Normal aging induces changes in the brain and neurodegeneration progress: Review of the structural, biochemical, metabolic, cellular, and molecular changes, 6 2022

    2022

  5. [5]

    D. L. Dickstein, C. M. Weaver, J. I. Luebke, and P. R. Hof. Dendritic spine changes associated with normal aging, 10 2013

    2013

  6. [6]

    Dickstein, Doron Kabaso, Anne B

    Dara L. Dickstein, Doron Kabaso, Anne B. Rocher, Jennifer I. Luebke, Susan L. Wearne, and Patrick R. Hof. Changes in the structural complexity of the aged brain, 6 2007

    2007

  7. [7]

    Gill, Robert A

    Caren Nassif, Allegra Kawles, Ivan Ayala, Grace Minogue, Nathan P. Gill, Robert A. Shepard, Antonia Zouridakis, Rachel Keszycki, Hui Zhang, Qin- wen Mao, Margaret E. Flanagan, Eileen H. Bigio, M. Marsel Mesulam, Emily Rogalski, Changiz Geula, and Tamar Gefen. Integrity of neuronal size in the entorhinal cortex is a biological substrate of exceptional cogn...

    2022

  8. [8]

    James Surmeier, Jos´ e A

    D. James Surmeier, Jos´ e A. Obeso, and Glenda M. Halliday. Selective neuronal vulnerability in parkinson disease, 2 2017

    2017

  9. [9]

    Huntington’s disease: from molec- ular pathogenesis to clinical treatment.The Lancet Neurology, 10(1):83–98, 2011

    Christopher A Ross and Sarah J Tabrizi. Huntington’s disease: from molec- ular pathogenesis to clinical treatment.The Lancet Neurology, 10(1):83–98, 2011

    2011

  10. [10]

    S. J. Baloyannis. Dendritic pathology in alzheimer’s disease.Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 283:153–157, 8 2009

    2009

  11. [11]

    The cellular basis of dendrite pathology in neurodegenerative diseases.BMB Reports, 50:5–11, 2017

    Jung Hyun Kweon, Sunhong Kim, and Sung Bae Lee. The cellular basis of dendrite pathology in neurodegenerative diseases.BMB Reports, 50:5–11, 2017

    2017

  12. [12]

    Architecture and cellular composition of focal cortical dysplasia type ii: qualitative review of histological studies.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 19:1708220, 2025

    Reyes Casta˜ no-Mart´ ın, Alice Metais, Sorana Ciura, and Thomas Blauw- blomme. Architecture and cellular composition of focal cortical dysplasia type ii: qualitative review of histological studies.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 19:1708220, 2025

    2025

  13. [13]

    Clarendon press, 1993

    Paul T Callaghan.Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy. Clarendon press, 1993. 22

    1993

  14. [14]

    Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient.The journal of chemical physics, 42(1):288–292, 1965

    Edward O Stejskal and John E Tanner. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient.The journal of chemical physics, 42(1):288–292, 1965

    1965

  15. [15]

    Molecular diffusion, tissue microdynamics and microstruc- ture.NMR in Biomedicine, 8:375–386, 1995

    Denis Le Bihan. Molecular diffusion, tissue microdynamics and microstruc- ture.NMR in Biomedicine, 8:375–386, 1995

    1995

  16. [16]

    Alexander, Tim B

    Daniel C. Alexander, Tim B. Dyrby, Markus Nilsson, and Hui Zhang. Imag- ing brain microstructure with diffusion mri: practicality and applications, 4 2019

    2019

  17. [17]

    Quantifying brain microstructure with diffusion mri: Theory and parame- ter estimation.NMR in Biomedicine, 32(4):e3998, 2019

    Dmitry S Novikov, Els Fieremans, Sune N Jespersen, and Valerij G Kiselev. Quantifying brain microstructure with diffusion mri: Theory and parame- ter estimation.NMR in Biomedicine, 32(4):e3998, 2019

    2019

  18. [18]

    Noddi: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain.Neuroimage, 61(4):1000–1016, 2012

    Hui Zhang, Torben Schneider, Claudia A Wheeler-Kingshott, and Daniel C Alexander. Noddi: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain.Neuroimage, 61(4):1000–1016, 2012

    2012

  19. [19]

    Reproducibility of the standard model of diffusion in white matter on clinical mri systems.NeuroImage, 257:119290, 2022

    Santiago Coelho, Steven H Baete, Gregory Lemberskiy, Benjamin Ades- Aron, Genevieve Barrol, Jelle Veraart, Dmitry S Novikov, and Els Fiere- mans. Reproducibility of the standard model of diffusion in white matter on clinical mri systems.NeuroImage, 257:119290, 2022

    2022

  20. [20]

    Diffusion tensor imaging (dti)-based white matter mapping in brain research: A review, 1 2008

    Yaniv Assaf and Ofer Pasternak. Diffusion tensor imaging (dti)-based white matter mapping in brain research: A review, 1 2008

    2008

  21. [21]

    Noninvasive quantification of axon radii using diffusion mri.elife, 9:e49855, 2020

    Jelle Veraart, Daniel Nunes, Umesh Rudrapatna, Els Fieremans, Derek K Jones, Dmitry S Novikov, and Noam Shemesh. Noninvasive quantification of axon radii using diffusion mri.elife, 9:e49855, 2020

    2020

  22. [22]

    Hall and Daniel C

    Matt G. Hall and Daniel C. Alexander. Convergence and parameter choice for monte-carlo simulations of diffusion mri.IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 28:1354–1364, 2009

    2009

  23. [23]

    Orientationally invari- ant indices of axon diameter and density from diffusion mri.Neuroimage, 52(4):1374–1389, 2010

    Daniel C Alexander, Penny L Hubbard, Matt G Hall, Elizabeth A Moore, Maurice Ptito, Geoff JM Parker, and Tim B Dyrby. Orientationally invari- ant indices of axon diameter and density from diffusion mri.Neuroimage, 52(4):1374–1389, 2010

    2010

  24. [24]

    Novikov, Jens H

    Els Fieremans, Dmitry S. Novikov, Jens H. Jensen, and Joseph A. Helpern. Monte carlo study of a two-compartment exchange model of diffusion.NMR in Biomedicine, 23:711–724, 8 2010

    2010

  25. [25]

    Robust monte-carlo simulations in diffusion-mri: Effect of the substrate complexity and parameter choice on the reproducibility of results.Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 14, 3 2020

    Jonathan Rafael-Patino, David Romascano, Alonso Ramirez-Manzanares, Erick Jorge Canales-Rodr´ ıguez, Gabriel Girard, and Jean Philippe Thiran. Robust monte-carlo simulations in diffusion-mri: Effect of the substrate complexity and parameter choice on the reproducibility of results.Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 14, 3 2020. 23

    2020

  26. [26]

    Hong-Hsi Lee, Els Fieremans, and Dmitry S Novikov. Realistic mi- crostructure simulator (rms): Monte carlo simulations of diffusion in three- dimensional cell segmentations of microscopy images.Journal of neuro- science methods, 350:109018, 2021

    2021

  27. [27]

    On the effects of a varied diffusion time in vivo: is the diffusion in white matter restricted?Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 27:176–187, 2 2009

    Markus Nilsson, Jimmy L¨ att, Emil Nordh, Ronnie Wirestam, Freddy St˚ ahlberg, and Sara Brockstedt. On the effects of a varied diffusion time in vivo: is the diffusion in white matter restricted?Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 27:176–187, 2 2009

    2009

  28. [28]

    Nilsson, E

    M. Nilsson, E. Alerstam, R. Wirestam, F. St˚ ahlberg, S. Brockstedt, and J. L¨ att. Evaluating the accuracy and precision of a two-compartment k¨ arger model using monte carlo simulations.Journal of Magnetic Reso- nance, 206:59–67, 9 2010

    2010

  29. [29]

    Neurite beading is sufficient to decrease the apparent diffusion coefficient after ischemic stroke.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(32):14472–14477, 2010

    Matthew D Budde and Joseph A Frank. Neurite beading is sufficient to decrease the apparent diffusion coefficient after ischemic stroke.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(32):14472–14477, 2010

    2010

  30. [30]

    Bennett A Landman, Jonathan AD Farrell, Seth A Smith, Daniel S Reich, Peter A Calabresi, and Peter CM Van Zijl. Complex geometric models of diffusion and relaxation in healthy and damaged white matter.NMR in Biomedicine: An International Journal Devoted to the Development and Application of Magnetic Resonance In vivo, 23(2):152–162, 2010

    2010

  31. [31]

    Time-dependent diffusion in undulating thin fibers: Impact on axon diameter estimation.NMR in Biomedicine, 33, 3 2020

    Jan Brabec, Samo Lasiˇ c, and Markus Nilsson. Time-dependent diffusion in undulating thin fibers: Impact on axon diameter estimation.NMR in Biomedicine, 33, 3 2020

    2020

  32. [32]

    The importance of axonal undulation in diffusion mr measurements: A monte carlo simulation study.NMR in Biomedicine, 25:795–805, 5 2012

    Markus Nilsson, Jimmy L¨ att, Freddy St˚ ahlberg, Danielle van Westen, and H˚ akan Hagsl¨ att. The importance of axonal undulation in diffusion mr measurements: A monte carlo simulation study.NMR in Biomedicine, 25:795–805, 5 2012

    2012

  33. [33]

    Marwan Abdellah, Juan Hernando, Stefan Eilemann, Samuel Lapere, Nico- las Antille, Henry Markram, and Felix Sch¨ urmann. Neuromorphovis: a collaborative framework for analysis and visualization of neuronal mor- phology skeletons reconstructed from microscopy stacks.Bioinformatics, 34(13):i574–i582, 2018

    2018

  34. [34]

    A time-dependent diffusion mri signature of axon caliber variations and beading.Communications biology, 3(1):354, 2020

    Hong-Hsi Lee, Antonios Papaioannou, Sung-Lyoung Kim, Dmitry S Novikov, and Els Fieremans. A time-dependent diffusion mri signature of axon caliber variations and beading.Communications biology, 3(1):354, 2020

    2020

  35. [35]

    Novikov, and Els Fiere- mans

    Hong Hsi Lee, Antonios Papaioannou, Dmitry S. Novikov, and Els Fiere- mans. In vivo observation and biophysical interpretation of time-dependent diffusion in human cortical gray matter.NeuroImage, 222, 11 2020. 24

    2020

  36. [36]

    Scattering approach to dif- fusion quantifies axonal damage in brain injury.Nature Communications, 16(1):9808, 2025

    Ali Abdollahzadeh, Ricardo Coronado-Leija, Hong-Hsi Lee, Alejandra Sierra, Els Fieremans, and Dmitry S Novikov. Scattering approach to dif- fusion quantifies axonal damage in brain injury.Nature Communications, 16(1):9808, 2025

    2025

  37. [37]

    Alexander, Marco Palombo, and Hui Zhang

    Ross Callaghan, Daniel C. Alexander, Marco Palombo, and Hui Zhang. Config: Contextual fibre growth to generate realistic axonal packing for diffusion mri simulation.NeuroImage, 220, 10 2020

    2020

  38. [38]

    K´ evin Ginsburger, Fabrice Poupon, Justine Beaujoin, Delphine Estournet, Felix Matuschke, Jean Fran¸ cois Mangin, Markus Axer, and Cyril Poupon. Improving the realism of white matter numerical phantoms: A step toward a better understanding of the influence of structural disorders in diffusion mri.Frontiers in Physics, 5, 2 2018

    2018

  39. [39]

    Canales-Rodr´ ıguez, Elda Fischi-Gomez, Gabriel Girard, Jean Philippe Thiran, and Jonathan Rafael- Pati˜ no

    Juan Luis Villarreal-Haro, Remy Gardier, Erick J. Canales-Rodr´ ıguez, Elda Fischi-Gomez, Gabriel Girard, Jean Philippe Thiran, and Jonathan Rafael- Pati˜ no. Cactus: a computational framework for generating realistic white matter microstructure substrates.Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 17, 2023

    2023

  40. [40]

    Winther, H

    S. Winther, H. Lundell, J. Rafael-Pati˜ no, M. Andersson, J. P. Thiran, and T. B. Dyrby. Susceptibility-induced internal gradients reveal axon mor- phology and cause anisotropic effects in the diffusion-weighted mri signal. Scientific Reports, 14, 12 2024

    2024

  41. [41]

    Caterpillar: a flexible framework for generating white matter nu- merical substrates with incorporated glial cells.Medical Image Analysis, page 103946, 2026

    Jasmine Nguyen-Duc, Malte Brammerloh, Melina Cherchali, In` es De Ried- matten, Jean-Baptiste P´ erot, Jonathan Rafael-Pati˜ no, and Ileana O Je- lescu. Caterpillar: a flexible framework for generating white matter nu- merical substrates with incorporated glial cells.Medical Image Analysis, page 103946, 2026

    2026

  42. [42]

    Ali Abdollahzadeh, Ricardo Coronado-Leija, Hong Hsi Lee, Alejandra Sierra, Els Fieremans, and Dmitry S. Novikov. Scattering approach to dif- fusion quantifies axonal damage in brain injury.Nature Communications, 16, 12 2025

    2025

  43. [43]

    Jelescu and Matthew D

    Ileana O. Jelescu and Matthew D. Budde. Design and validation of diffusion mri models of white matter, 11 2017

    2017

  44. [44]

    Challenges for biophysical modeling of microstructure.Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 344:108861, 2020

    Ileana O Jelescu, Marco Palombo, Francesca Bagnato, and Kurt G Schilling. Challenges for biophysical modeling of microstructure.Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 344:108861, 2020

    2020

  45. [45]

    Medusa: A gpu-based tool to create realistic phantoms of the brain microstructure using tiny spheres.Neu- roImage, 193:10–24, 6 2019

    K´ evin Ginsburger, Felix Matuschke, Fabrice Poupon, Jean Fran¸ cois Man- gin, Markus Axer, and Cyril Poupon. Medusa: A gpu-based tool to create realistic phantoms of the brain microstructure using tiny spheres.Neu- roImage, 193:10–24, 6 2019

    2019

  46. [46]

    What does fexi measure in neurons? arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20657, 2026

    Valerij G Kiselev and Jing-Rebecca Li. What does fexi measure in neurons? arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20657, 2026. 25

    arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    Diffusion mri simulation of realistic neurons with spindoctor and the neuron module.NeuroImage, 222, 11 2020

    Chengran Fang, Van Dang Nguyen, Demian Wassermann, and Jing Re- becca Li. Diffusion mri simulation of realistic neurons with spindoctor and the neuron module.NeuroImage, 222, 11 2020

    2020

  48. [48]

    A generative model of realistic brain cells with application to numerical simulation of the diffusion-weighted mr signal.NeuroImage, 188:391–402, 2019

    Marco Palombo, Daniel C Alexander, and Hui Zhang. A generative model of realistic brain cells with application to numerical simulation of the diffusion-weighted mr signal.NeuroImage, 188:391–402, 2019

    2019

  49. [49]

    Map- ping complex cell morphology in the grey matter with double diffusion encoding mr: A simulation study.Neuroimage, 241:118424, 2021

    Andrada Ianus, Daniel C Alexander, Hui Zhang, and Marco Palombo. Map- ping complex cell morphology in the grey matter with double diffusion encoding mr: A simulation study.Neuroimage, 241:118424, 2021

    2021

  50. [50]

    Neuromorpho

    Giorgio A Ascoli, Duncan E Donohue, and Maryam Halavi. Neuromorpho. org: a central resource for neuronal morphologies.Journal of Neuroscience, 27(35):9247–9251, 2007

    2007

  51. [51]

    Morpholog- ical diversity of single neurons in molecularly defined cell types.Nature, 598(7879):174–181, 2021

    Hanchuan Peng, Peng Xie, Lijuan Liu, Xiuli Kuang, Yimin Wang, Lei Qu, Hui Gong, Shengdian Jiang, Anan Li, Zongcai Ruan, et al. Morpholog- ical diversity of single neurons in molecularly defined cell types.Nature, 598(7879):174–181, 2021

    2021

  52. [52]

    Decoding gray matter, large-scale analysis of brain cell morphometry to inform microstructural modeling of diffusion mr signals

    Charlie Aird-Rossiter, Hui Zhang, Daniel C Alexander, Derek K Jones, and Marco Palombo. Decoding gray matter, large-scale analysis of brain cell morphometry to inform microstructural modeling of diffusion mr signals. Communications Biology, 2026

    2026

  53. [53]

    A topological representation of branching neuronal morphologies.Neuroinformatics, 16:3–13, 2018

    Lida Kanari, Pawe l D lotko, Martina Scolamiero, Ran Levi, Julian Shill- cock, Kathryn Hess, and Henry Markram. A topological representation of branching neuronal morphologies.Neuroinformatics, 16:3–13, 2018

    2018

  54. [54]

    Computational synthesis of cortical dendritic morphologies.Cell Reports, 39(1), 2022

    Lida Kanari, Hugo Dictus, Athanassia Chalimourda, Alexis Arnaudon, Werner Van Geit, Benoit Coste, Julian Shillcock, Kathryn Hess, and Henry Markram. Computational synthesis of cortical dendritic morphologies.Cell Reports, 39(1), 2022

    2022

  55. [55]

    Mariam Andersson, Hans Martin Kjer, Jonathan Rafael-Patino, Alexan- dra Pacureanu, Bente Pakkenberg, Jean-Philippe Thiran, Maurice Ptito, Martin Bech, Anders Bjorholm Dahl, Vedrana Andersen Dahl, et al. Axon morphology is modulated by the local environment and impacts the non- invasive investigation of its structure–function relationship.Proceedings of th...

    2020

  56. [56]

    Tsai, John P

    Philbert S. Tsai, John P. Kaufhold, Pablo Blinder, Beth Friedman, Patrick J. Drew, Harvey J. Karten, Patrick D. Lyden, and David Kleinfeld. Correlations of neuronal and microvascular densities in murine cortex re- vealed by direct counting and colocalization of nuclei and vessels.Journal of Neuroscience, 29:14553–14570, 11 2009

    2009

  57. [57]

    Ascoli, Duncan E

    Giorgio A. Ascoli, Duncan E. Donohue, and Maryam Halavi. Neuromor- pho.org: A central resource for neuronal morphologies, 8 2007. 26

    2007

  58. [58]

    Gouwens, Staci A

    Nathan W. Gouwens, Staci A. Sorensen, Jim Berg, Changkyu Lee, Tim Jarsky, Jonathan Ting, Susan M. Sunkin, David Feng, Costas A. Anas- tassiou, Eliza Barkan, Kris Bickley, Nicole Blesie, Thomas Braun, Krissy Brouner, Agata Budzillo, Shiella Caldejon, Tamara Casper, Dan Castelli, Peter Chong, Kirsten Crichton, Christine Cuhaciyan, Tanya L. Daigle, Rachel Da...

    2019

  59. [59]

    Ansell and Istv´ an A

    Helen S. Ansell and Istv´ an A. Kov´ acs. Unveiling universal aspects of the cellular anatomy of the brain.Communications Physics, 7, 12 2024

    2024

  60. [60]

    A note on two problems in connexion with graphs

    Edsger W Dijkstra. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. In Edsger Wybe Dijkstra: his life, work, and legacy, pages 287–290. 2022

    2022

  61. [61]

    Nature, 640(8058):435–447, 2025

    Functional connectomics spanning multiple areas of mouse visual cortex. Nature, 640(8058):435–447, 2025

    2025

  62. [62]

    Microns: Machine intelligence from cortical net- works, December 2021

    MICrONS Consortium. Microns: Machine intelligence from cortical net- works, December 2021

    2021

  63. [63]

    Disimpy: A mas- sively parallel monte carlo simulator for generating diffusion-weighted mri data in python.Journal of Open Source Software, 5:2527, 8 2020

    Leevi Kerkel¨ a, Fabio Nery, Matt Hall, and Chris Clark. Disimpy: A mas- sively parallel monte carlo simulator for generating diffusion-weighted mri data in python.Journal of Open Source Software, 5:2527, 8 2020

    2020

  64. [64]

    Sandi: a compartment-based model for non-invasive apparent soma and neurite imaging by diffusion mri

    Marco Palombo, Andrada Ianus, Michele Guerreri, Daniel Nunes, Daniel C Alexander, Noam Shemesh, and Hui Zhang. Sandi: a compartment-based model for non-invasive apparent soma and neurite imaging by diffusion mri. Neuroimage, 215:116835, 2020

    2020

  65. [65]

    Neurite exchange imaging (nexi): A minimal model of diffusion in gray matter with inter-compartment water exchange.NeuroImage, 256:119277, 2022

    Ileana O Jelescu, Alexandre de Skowronski, Fran¸ coise Geffroy, Marco Palombo, and Dmitry S Novikov. Neurite exchange imaging (nexi): A minimal model of diffusion in gray matter with inter-compartment water exchange.NeuroImage, 256:119277, 2022. 27

    2022

  66. [66]

    The role of dendritic spines in water exchange mea- surements with diffusion mri: Double diffusion encoding and free-waveform mri.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21537, 2025

    Arthur Chakwizira, Kadir S ¸im¸ sek, Filip Szczepankiewicz, Marco Palombo, and Markus Nilsson. The role of dendritic spines in water exchange mea- surements with diffusion mri: Double diffusion encoding and free-waveform mri.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21537, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    The role of dendritic spines in water exchange measurements with diffu- sion mri: Time-dependent single diffusion encoding mri.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18229, 2025

    Kadir S ¸im¸ sek, Arthur Chakwizira, Markus Nilsson, and Marco Palombo. The role of dendritic spines in water exchange measurements with diffu- sion mri: Time-dependent single diffusion encoding mri.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18229, 2025. 28

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025