Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 102 references

Janus MgAlB_2 MBene: a dipole-engineered anode for ultrafast Li-ion transport and exceptional lithium storage

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A permanent out-of-plane dipole lets Janus MgAlB2 store two full Li layers and diffuse Li with a 17.1 meV barrier.

desk verdict Solid incremental DFT anode paper: new Janus MgAlB2 with a clear residual-polarization story for double-layer Li, ultralow barrier, and thorough parent comparisons; second-layer window is thin but not fabricated. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.03823 v1 pith:KKLQEOW7 submitted 2026-07-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.other

Pritam Samanta , Sashank Kumar Pandey , Amit Kumar Jana , Prakash Parida This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.other
keywords JanusMBeneMgAlB2intrinsicpolarizationLi-iondiffusionbarriertheoreticalcapacitytwo-dimensionalanodedipoleengineering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper designs a Janus MBene by swapping one magnesium face of Mg2B2 for aluminum. That single substitution breaks inversion symmetry, creates a built-in out-of-plane dipole, and changes the electronic landscape of the boron sheet. First-principles calculations then show that the polarized monolayer remains dynamically, mechanically and thermally stable while offering an extremely flat Li diffusion path (17.1 meV barrier on the Mg face) and enough residual polarization after the first Li layer to stabilize a second complete layer. The result is a theoretical capacity of 1470 mAh g-1—roughly double that of either parent compound—together with only 3.7 % volume expansion. The authors present this as proof that intentional dipole engineering can simultaneously raise capacity and speed ion transport in light-element two-dimensional anodes.

What carries the argument

The built-in out-of-plane dipole (+0.39 Debye in the pristine sheet, still +0.15 Debye after first-layer lithiation) that arises from the Mg/Al electronegativity difference; residual polarization continues to favor Li binding after the first layer is full, while Li–Li repulsion eventually caps storage at two layers.

What would settle it

Synthesis of freestanding or substrate-supported MgAlB2 followed by measured Li capacity and room-temperature diffusivity; if the material cannot be made or stores only one Li layer with a barrier near the parent values (~25–33 meV), the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Replacing one Mg layer of centrosymmetric Mg2B2 with Al produces a Janus MgAlB2 monolayer whose permanent out-of-plane dipole modifies both the Li adsorption energy landscape and the migration barrier, enabling two complete Li layers (1470.24 mAh g-1) and an ultralow 17.1 meV diffusion barrier while the parent Mg2B2 and Al2B2 monolayers each support only a single stable layer.

Load-bearing premise

That a formation energy of only -0.067 eV per atom and short 10 ps molecular-dynamics runs at 500 K are enough to guarantee experimental accessibility and long-term cycling integrity of freestanding MgAlB2 under real electrolyte conditions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Janus substitution of light main-group metals becomes a systematic route to raise both capacity and rate of MBene anodes.
  • Residual surface polarization after first-layer lithiation can be used as a design metric for multilayer Li storage.
  • Non-transition-metal MBenes can rival or exceed transition-metal MBenes in gravimetric capacity while avoiding strongly localized d-states that trap ions.
  • Ultra-low barriers (~17 meV) place MgAlB2 among the fastest reported 2-D Li conductors, competitive with graphite kinetics at far higher capacity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Mg/Al asymmetry strategy could be applied to other alkaline-earth/group-III borides to generate a family of polarized light-element anodes.
  • If residual dipole is the key stabilizer of the second Li layer, intentional surface termination or heterostructure stacking that preserves that dipole may further extend capacity beyond two layers.
  • Phonon-band-center softening upon Li adsorption, already linked by the authors to barrier height, offers a cheap computational filter for screening other Janus candidates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a freestanding Janus MgAlB2 MBene (one Mg layer of Mg2B2 replaced by Al) as a Li-ion anode and studies it with PBE+D3 DFT. Symmetry breaking produces an out-of-plane dipole (~0.39 Debye) and a metallic electronic structure with hybridized B/Mg/Al states near EF. The authors report dynamical, mechanical, and thermal stability (phonons, Born–Huang elastic constants, 10 ps AIMD at 500 K), an ultralow Mg-face Li diffusion barrier of 17.1 meV (D ≈ 3.43×10−10 cm2 s−1 at 300 K), and—unlike parent Mg2B2 and Al2B2, which stabilize only one Li layer—stable double-layer lithiation (n = 16 on a 2×2 cell) giving a theoretical capacity of 1470.24 mAh g−1 with ~3.7% volume expansion. Residual polarization after first-layer lithiation is invoked as the mechanism that extends storage beyond the parents.

Significance. If the double-layer capacity and ultralow barrier hold under more stringent checks, the work supplies a concrete, non-transition-metal design rule: Janus polarity as a handle on both Li thermodynamics and kinetics in light MBenes. Strengths include a full parent comparison (Mg2B2, Al2B2), multi-path CI-NEB (barriers ~16.7–17.4 meV), phonon-band-center correlation with mobility, ICOHP/Bader/EDD analysis, convex-hull OCV, and small reported volume change. The numerical claims are direct DFT outputs rather than fitted targets. The result would be of interest for 2D anode design even if experimental synthesis remains open.

major comments (4)
  1. [§6, Fig. 13, Eq. (5)] §6 and Fig. 13: The central capacity claim (1470.24 mAh g−1 from two complete Li layers) rests on E_ave remaining only −0.12 eV at n = 16 and turning positive beyond, with residual dipole reduced to +0.15 ẑ Debye after first-layer saturation. These energies sit near the typical accuracy of PBE+D3 for alkali adsorption and Li–Li repulsion; a ~0.1–0.15 eV shift (functional, vdW, or finite-size) can close the second-layer window. Parents already jump to positive E_ave once the first layer is full (Fig. S12). Please add sensitivity tests (e.g., hybrid or meta-GGA single-points, alternative vdW, larger supercell, and explicit Li-cluster vs adsorbed second-layer comparisons) and report error bars or energy windows so the polarization-enabled double-layer claim is not over-determined by a single functional.
  2. [§8 Conclusions; cf. Abstract and §6] Conclusions vs body/abstract: The abstract and §6 state two complete Li layers (n = 16, capacity formula with four Li per unit cell), but the Conclusions assert that Al incorporation enables “adsorption of up to three Li layers per surface.” That is inconsistent with the reported energetics (third-layer E_ave ≈ +0.06 eV at n = 24) and with the capacity number. Correct the conclusions and any related claims so the storage limit matches the convex-hull and E_ave analysis.
  3. [§3.1.1, Eq. (1); Abstract] §3.1.1, Eq. (1): Formation energy is only −0.067 eV/atom relative to bulk elemental references. That is weak thermodynamic driving force and does not by itself establish “potential experimental accessibility.” Cohesive energy (−4.45 eV/atom) is more favorable but answers a different question. Soften synthesis claims, discuss competing phases (e.g., bulk borides, Mg/Al segregation), and avoid equating a small negative E_form plus short AIMD with experimental accessibility of a freestanding Janus monolayer.
  4. [§3.1.4; §7; Fig. 16 / Fig. S16] §3.1.4 and §7 AIMD: 10 ps NVT at 500 K without bond breaking is a useful screen but is short for asserting cycling-relevant thermal integrity of pristine and fully lithiated structures. Either extend trajectories (or use larger cells / multiple seeds) or clearly frame AIMD as a limited stability check rather than evidence of long-term cycling robustness under residual-dipole second-layer conditions.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Title page / SI] Author name inconsistency: title page “Sashank Kumar Pandey” vs SI “Shashank Pandey.” Harmonize.
  2. [Supporting Information] SI figure labels are scrambled (multiple panels labeled Fig. S5/S7; EDD captions for Mg2B2/Al2B2 overlap). Renumber and re-caption so each figure is unique and matches the main-text citations.
  3. [§3.3–§7, Eqs. (5), (11)–(13)] Eq. (5) uses r for the number of Li atoms in layer p; later text uses n and m for concentration. Define symbols once and keep notation consistent across adsorption energy, formation energy, and OCV equations.
  4. [Table 2; §3.3] Table 2: adsorption energy at S4 is listed as −0.64 eV in the table but −0.61 eV in the surrounding text; reconcile.
  5. [§5, Eq. (7)] Diffusion coefficient: state explicitly that ν0 = 10^13 Hz is a conventional attempt frequency (not computed from the Li-projected phonon band center), and note the sensitivity of D to that choice.
  6. [Throughout] Minor prose/typos: “alternati ve,” “perpetuation of LIBs,” “Al2B2” vs “AL2B2,” “mAhg⁻¹” spacing, and occasional repeated sentences in the introduction. A careful copy-edit would help.
  7. [Fig. 7] Fig. 7 caption swaps Mg/Al surface labels relative to the panel description in the text; verify top/side views against the defined +ẑ (Al→Mg) convention.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: capacity, barriers, and residual-dipole claims are direct DFT/NEB outputs, not fits or self-definitional reductions.

full rationale

The load-bearing quantities (E_ave vs n from Eq. 5, CI-NEB barriers of 17.1 meV, residual dipole +0.15 ẑ Debye after first-layer lithiation, capacity via Eq. 8 with x_max = 4, D from Arrhenius with conventional ϑ0 = 10^13 Hz) are computed ab initio on the Janus structure and its parents; none is obtained by fitting a parameter to the target capacity/barrier and then re-labeling it a prediction. Parent monolayers are taken from independent literature (Sun et al., Zou et al.), not from an author uniqueness theorem that forbids alternatives. Self-citations supply background on related 2D anodes or methods and do not close a definitional loop. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no self-definitional, fitted-input, or load-bearing self-citation circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central electrochemical claims rest on standard DFT approximations and a few conventional numerical choices (attempt frequency, elemental chemical potentials, vacuum thickness, supercell size). The only invented entity is the proposed freestanding Janus MgAlB2 monolayer itself. No parameters are fitted to battery performance data; multilayer stability is read off average adsorption energies remaining negative.

free parameters (2)
  • attempt_frequency_nu0
    Diffusion coefficient uses Arrhenius form with ν0 fixed at 10^13 Hz (stated as typical 10–100 THz order). D scales linearly with this choice; not fitted but conventional and load-bearing for the quoted 3.43×10−10 cm2/s.
  • elemental_chemical_potentials_for_Eform
    Formation energy uses bulk hcp Mg, fcc Al, rhombohedral B energies (Table S1). Choice of reference phases sets the sign/magnitude of the near-zero Eform = −0.067 eV/atom used to argue synthesizability.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption GGA-PBE plus DFT-D3(BJ) is sufficiently accurate for relative Li adsorption energies, multilayer stability, and CI-NEB barriers on MgAlB2.
    All thermodynamics and kinetics of storage are computed at this level without hybrid or beyond-DFT checks (Computational methods; §§3–6).
  • domain assumption Negative average adsorption energy Eave (Eq. 5) up to n=16 implies stable double-layer lithiation without metallic Li clustering under battery conditions.
    Maximum capacity and the two-layer claim are defined by Eave remaining negative and formation-energy convex hull (§6, Fig. 13).
  • domain assumption OCV ≈ −Eave / e with PΔV and TΔS neglected (Eqs. 10–11).
    Standard solid-electrode approximation used for the voltage profile (§7).
  • standard math Born–Huang criteria for 2D hexagonal elastic constants and absence of imaginary phonons establish mechanical/dynamical stability of the freestanding monolayer.
    Invoked in §§3.1.2–3.1.3 with computed Cij and phonon dispersions.
  • ad hoc to paper 10 ps NVT AIMD at 500 K without bond breaking demonstrates thermal stability relevant to cycling.
    Short trajectory used as evidence for both pristine and fully lithiated sheets (§3.1.4, §7); duration is a paper-level choice, not a theorem.
invented entities (1)
  • Janus MgAlB2 freestanding MBene monolayer
    purpose: Provide a polarized non-transition-metal boride host that enables double-layer Li storage and ultralow diffusion barriers relative to Mg2B2/Al2B2.
    Material is proposed and characterized only computationally; no experimental structure or synthesis report is given. independent_evidence is false within the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Janus MgAlB_2 MBene: a dipole-engineered anode for ultrafast Li-ion transport and exceptional lithium storage." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KKLQEOW7

@misc{pith2026260703823,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Janus MgAlB_2 MBene: a dipole-engineered anode for ultrafast Li-ion transport and exceptional lithium storage},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KKLQEOW7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03823}
}
read the original abstract

In this work, we propose a group II/IIIA-based Janus MBene, MgAlB_2, and investigate its electrochemical properties using first-principles calculations. The substitution of one Mg layer in Mg_2B_2 MBene by an Al layer breaks the structural symmetry and generates a permanent out-of-plane polarization, giving rise to a distinct electronic environment compared with the parent Mg_2B_2 and Al_2B_2 monolayers. Electronic-structure analysis reveals enhanced orbital hybridization among B, Mg, and Al states near the Fermi level, resulting in improved electronic delocalization across the monolayer. The Janus MgAlB_2 monolayer is found to possess excellent dynamical, mechanical, and thermal stability. Owing to its polarization-modified energy landscape, Li ions migrate with an exceptionally low diffusion barrier of 17.1 meV, corresponding to a room-temperature diffusion coefficient of 3.43x10^-10 cm^2/s. Unlike the pristine Mg_2B_2 and Al_2B_2 monolayers, which support only a single stable adsorption layer, MgAlB_2 accommodates two complete Li layers. Detailed analysis shows that the residual polarization retained after first-layer lithiation continues to promote Li adsorption, whereas increasing Li-Li electrostatic interactions eventually limit further storage. As a result, the Janus monolayer delivers a high theoretical specific capacity of 1470.24 mAh/g together with a small volume expansion of only 3.7% during maximum lithiation. The present study demonstrates that intrinsic polarization can be utilized to regulate both the thermodynamics and kinetics of Li storage, providing a design strategy for high-rate and high-capacity two-dimensional electrode materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03823 by the authors.

Figure 4
Figure 4. Furthermore, the Li-projected phonon band centers are found to be 4.32 THz and 7.36 THz on the Mg and Al surfaces, respectively. The reduction in both the total and Li-projected phonon band centers relative to the pristine monolayer indicates a softening of the vibrational spectrum and a decrease in the average vibrational frequency. Such phonon softening is generally associated with weaker restoring forces acting o… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. (a) Average adsorption energies (b) relative formation energies as a function of number of Li atoms adsorbed on the 2 × 2 × 1 supercell of Janus MgAlB2 monolayer. Here ‘n’ represents the number of Li atoms adsorbed on the monolayer. Notably, for the formation energy calculation we have considered nmax= 16 corresponds to m = 1.0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_14.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Open circuit voltage (OCV) profile against Li/Li+ of MgAlB2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Snapshots of fully lithium adsorbed MgAlB2 monolayer after AIMD simulations for 10 ps with NVT ensemble at 500K. During the initial stage of the simulation, the free energy exhibits relatively large fluctuations as the system approaches thermal equilibrium. After equi…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Snapshots of pristine MgAlB2 monolayer after AIMD simulations for 10 ps with NVT ensemble at 500K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references

  1. [1]

    de Oliveira Matias, J.C. and T.C. Devezas, Consumption dynamics of primary-energy sources: The century of alternative energies. Applied Energy, 2007. 84(7-8): p. 763-770

    2007

  2. [2]

    Cui, and N

    Chu, S., Y. Cui, and N. Liu, The path towards sustainable energy. Nature Materials, 2017. 16(1): p. 16- 22

    2017

  3. [3]

    Energy Strategy Reviews, 2022

    Ang, T.-Z., et al., A comprehensive study of renewable energy sources: Classifications, challenges and suggestions. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2022. 43: p. 100939

    2022

  4. [4]

    Nature Communications, 2022

    Gulagi, A., et al., The role of renewables for rapid transitioning of the power sector across states in India. Nature Communications, 2022. 13(1): p. 5499

    2022

  5. [6]

    Samanta, and P

    Kumar, A., P. Samanta, and P. Parida, Electrochemical performance of gold monolayers for lithium-ion batteries: A first-principles study. Journal of Energy Storage, 2026. 163: p. 122132

    2026

  6. [7]

    Science, 2012

    Miller, J.R., Valuing reversible energy storage. Science, 2012. 335(6074): p. 1312-1313

    2012

  7. [8]

    Nature communications, 2016

    Kim, S., et al., Electrochemically driven mechanical energy harvesting. Nature communications, 2016. 7(1): p. 10146

    2016

  8. [9]

    Nature communications, 2014

    Song, Z., et al., Origami lithium-ion batteries. Nature communications, 2014. 5(1): p. 3140

    2014

Show all 102 references
  1. [10]

    Kumar, and P

    Samanta, P., A. Kumar, and P. Parida, Two-Dimensional Antiferromagnetic Fe2As2 as an Anode Material for Rechargeable Li-Ion Batteries: A DFT Study. Advanced Theory and Simulations, 2026. 9(1): p. e01068

    2026

  2. [11]

    Kumar, A. and P. Parida, Theoretical study of δ-5 boron monolayer as an anode material for Li- and non-Li-ion batteries. Journal of Materials Research, 2022. 37(20): p. 3384-3393

    2022

  3. [12]

    Kumar, A. and P. Parida, Iron-arsenide monolayers as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries: a first-principles study. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2024. 26(15): p. 12060-12069

    2024

  4. [13]

    Nano letters, 2021

    Kato, K., et al., Light-assisted rechargeable lithium batteries: organic molecules for simultaneous energy harvesting and storage. Nano letters, 2021. 21(2): p. 907-913

    2021

  5. [14]

    and K.-S

    Goodenough, J.B. and K.-S. Park, The Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery: A Perspective. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013. 135(4): p. 1167-1176

    2013

  6. [15]

    Larcher, D. and J.M. Tarascon, Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. Nature Chemistry, 2015. 7(1): p. 19-29

    2015

  7. [16]

    Scrosati, and J.M

    Bruce, P.G., B. Scrosati, and J.M. Tarascon, Nanomaterials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2008. 47(16): p. 2930-2946

    2008

  8. [17]

    Song, and X

    Guo, P., H. Song, and X. Chen, Electrochemical performance of graphene nanosheets as anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochemistry Communications, 2009. 11(6): p. 1320-1324

    2009

  9. [18]

    Materials today chemistry, 2019

    Al Hassan, M., et al., Emergence of graphene as a promising anode material for rechargeable batteries: a review. Materials today chemistry, 2019. 11: p. 225-243

    2019

  10. [19]

    Nature Reviews Clean Technology,

    Jiang, T., et al., Battery technologies for grid-scale energy storage. Nature Reviews Clean Technology,

  11. [21]

    Advanced Energy Materials, 2016

    Zhao, Y., et al., Recent developments and understanding of novel mixed transition‐metal oxides as anodes in lithium-ion batteries. Advanced Energy Materials, 2016. 6(8): p. 1502175

    2016

  12. [22]

    Ji, and Y

    Yang, E., H. Ji, and Y. Jung, Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers as promising sodium ion battery anodes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015. 119(47): p. 26374- 26380

    2015

  13. [23]

    Advanced Materials, 2020

    Yun, Q., et al., Layered transition metal dichalcogenide‐based nanomaterials for electrochemical energy storage. Advanced Materials, 2020. 32(1): p. 1903826

    2020

  14. [24]

    Chemistry of Materials, 2010

    Xiao, J., et al., Exfoliated MoS2 nanocomposite as an anode material for lithium ion batteries. Chemistry of Materials, 2010. 22(16): p. 4522-4524

    2010

  15. [25]

    Ionics, 2024

    Wang, K., et al., development status and modification strategies of nano-MoS2-based anode materials. Ionics, 2024. 30(8): p. 4387-4415

    2024

  16. [26]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013

    Jing, Y., et al., Metallic VS2 monolayer: a promising 2D anode material for lithium ion batteries. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013. 117(48): p. 25409-25413

    2013

  17. [27]

    Liu, and N.V

    Deng, J., J.Z. Liu, and N.V. Medhekar, Enhanced lithium adsorption and diffusion on silicene nanoribbons. RSC Advances, 2013. 3(43): p. 20338-20344

    2013

  18. [28]

    Kazeminezhad, and J

    Seyed-Talebi, S.M., I. Kazeminezhad, and J. Beheshtian, Theoretical prediction of silicene as a new candidate for the anode of lithium-ion batteries. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2015. 17(44): p. 29689-29696

    2015

  19. [29]

    Journal of Energy Storage, 2024

    Regragui, N., et al., Unlocking the potential of a chemically modified blue phosphorene as anode materials for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024. 97: p. 112886

    2024

  20. [30]

    Bat‐Erdene, and J.G

    Batmunkh, M., M. Bat‐Erdene, and J.G. Shapter, Phosphorene and phosphorene‐based materials– prospects for future applications. Advanced Materials, 2016. 28(39): p. 8586-8617

    2016

  21. [31]

    Nanoscale, 2016

    Zhang, X., et al., Borophene as an extremely high-capacity electrode material for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries. Nanoscale, 2016. 8(33): p. 15340-15347

    2016

  22. [32]

    Zhou, and P

    Tang, Q., Z. Zhou, and P. Shen, Are MXenes promising anode materials for Li ion batteries? Computational studies on electronic properties and Li storage capability of Ti3C2 and Ti3C2X2 (X= F, OH) monolayer. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012. 134(40): p. 16909-16916

    2012

  23. [33]

    Barg, and M.A

    Greaves, M., S. Barg, and M.A. Bissett, MXene‐based anodes for metal‐ion batteries. Batteries & Supercaps, 2020. 3(3): p. 214-235

    2020

  24. [34]

    Zhou, and Z

    Zhang, B., J. Zhou, and Z. Sun, MBenes: progress, challenges and future. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2022. 10(30): p. 15865-15880

    2022

  25. [35]

    Physical Review Materials, 2022

    Li, Y., et al., Computational evaluation of ScB and TiB MBenes as promising anode materials for high- performance metal-ion batteries. Physical Review Materials, 2022. 6(4): p. 045801

    2022

  26. [36]

    Computational Materials Science, 2024

    Wang, Y., et al., On two-dimensional metal borides (MBenes) as anode materials for metal-ion batteries: A first-principles study. Computational Materials Science, 2024. 233: p. 112710

    2024

  27. [37]

    Zhou, and Z

    Guo, Z., J. Zhou, and Z. Sun, New two-dimensional transition metal borides for Li ion batteries and electrocatalysis. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017. 5(45): p. 23530-23535

    2017

  28. [38]

    Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials,

    Ramezanzadeh, M., et al., 2D-Transition Metal Borides (MBenes): a comprehensive review of the materials, chemistry, advances, and novel applications. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials,

  29. [39]

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2018

    Bo, T., et al., Hexagonal Ti 2 B 2 monolayer: a promising anode material offering high rate capability for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2018. 20(34): p. 22168-22178

    2018

  30. [40]

    npj 2D Materials and Applications, 2021

    Bhat, A., et al., Prospects challenges and stability of 2D MXenes for clean energy conversion and storage applications. npj 2D Materials and Applications, 2021. 5(1): p. 61

    2021

  31. [41]

    Plasmonics, 2025

    Jalaludeen, S.A., et al., An Overview of Two-Dimensional Nanomaterial—MXene in Energy Storage and Sensing Application. Plasmonics, 2025. 20(10): p. 9083-9097

    2025

  32. [42]

    Agarwal, and S

    Tripathy, D.B., P. Agarwal, and S. Pradhan, MBenes: emerging two-dimensional metal borides for multifunctional energy storage and conversion technologies. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2026. 14(11): p. 6217-6241

    2026

  33. [43]

    ACS Omega, 2025

    Rahman, A.U., et al., Unveiling the Structural Stability and Optoelectronic Properties of Pristine and Janus Monolayers. ACS Omega, 2025. 10(19): p. 19574-19584

    2025

  34. [44]

    Vinod, and R.K

    Choudhary, T., S. Vinod, and R.K. Biswas, Thermoelectric performance of Janus monolayers embedded in MX2-based superlattices: a computational insight. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics,

  35. [45]

    Senapati, and P

    Kumar, A., P. Senapati, and P. Parida, Unravelling the potential of a hybrid borocarbonitride biphenylene 2D network for thermoelectric applications: a first principles study. Nanoscale, 2025. 17(7): p. 4015-4029

    2025

  36. [46]

    Senapati, and P

    Kumar, A., P. Senapati, and P. Parida, Theoretical insights into the structural, electronic and thermoelectric properties of the inorganic biphenylene monolayer. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2024. 26(3): p. 2044-2057

    2024

  37. [47]

    Kumar, and P

    Senapati, P., A. Kumar, and P. Parida, Enhanced thermopower in two-dimensional ruthenium dichalcogenides RuX2 (X = S, Se): a first-principles study. Physica Scripta, 2025. 100(6): p. 065923

    2025

  38. [48]

    Senapati, P. and P. Parida, Thermoelectric performance of quantum dots embedded in an Aharonov- Bohm ring: a Pauli master equation approach. Scientific Reports, 2025. 15(1): p. 13232

    2025

  39. [49]

    Xiong, F. and Y. Chen, A first-principles study of Janus monolayer TiSSe and VSSe as anode materials in alkali metal ion batteries. Nanotechnology, 2021. 32(2): p. 025702

    2021

  40. [50]

    Alfurhud, S. and U. Schwingenschlögl, Engineering of Janus transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers as absorber materials for solar cells. Scientific Reports, 2025. 15(1): p. 14863

    2025

  41. [51]

    Physical Review B, 2025

    Yan, L., et al., Janus $M\text{SH}$ ($M$ = Sc, Y, V, Nb, Ta) monolayers: Promising candidates for photocatalytic water splitting and out-of-plane piezoelectricity. Physical Review B, 2025. 112(24): p. 245427

    2025

  42. [52]

    Physical Review Materials, 2024

    Wang, F., et al., Insight into Janus ${\mathrm{V}}_{2}\mathrm{COS}$ as anode material of high- performance alkali metal ion battery: Diffusion barrier, recyclability, specific capacity, and open-circuit voltage. Physical Review Materials, 2024. 8(8): p. 085801

    2024

  43. [53]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018

    Shang, C., et al., Theoretical prediction of Janus MoSSe as a potential anode material for lithium-ion batteries. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018. 122(42): p. 23899-23909

    2018

  44. [54]

    Computational Materials Science, 2022

    Wang, J., et al., Ordered double transition metal MBene: the hexagonal ScTiB2 monolayer as a superior anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Computational Materials Science, 2022. 214: p. 111736

    2022

  45. [55]

    ACS Nano, 2015

    Anasori, B., et al., Two-Dimensional, Ordered, Double Transition Metals Carbides (MXenes). ACS Nano, 2015. 9(10): p. 9507-9516

    2015

  46. [56]

    RSC Advances, 2024

    Han, Y., et al., Exploring the potential of MB2 MBene family as promising anodes for Li-ion batteries. RSC Advances, 2024. 14(16): p. 11112-11120

    2024

  47. [57]

    Nanoscale, 2024

    Sun, Y., et al., Hexagonal Mg2B2 and Ca2B2 monolayers as promising anode materials for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries. Nanoscale, 2024. 16(33): p. 15699-15712

    2024

  48. [58]

    Materials Today Communications, 2024

    Ma, S., et al., The superconducting Dirac AlB6 monolayer as an excellent anode material for Li/Na ion batteries. Materials Today Communications, 2024. 39: p. 109325

    2024

  49. [59]

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2023

    Zou, R.-F., et al., Two-dimensional AlB4/Al2B2: high-performance Dirac anode materials for sodium- ion batteries. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2023. 25(42): p. 28814-28823

    2023

  50. [60]

    Nanoscale, 2022

    Abedi, S., et al., Prediction of novel two-dimensional Dirac nodal line semimetals in Al2B2 and AlB4 monolayers. Nanoscale, 2022. 14(31): p. 11270-11283

    2022

  51. [61]

    Kresse, G. and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. 54(16): p. 11169

  52. [62]

    Journal of computational chemistry, 2008

    Hafner, J., Ab‐initio simulations of materials using VASP: Density‐functional theory and beyond. Journal of computational chemistry, 2008. 29(13): p. 2044-2078

    2008

  53. [63]

    Monkhorst, H.J. and J.D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Physical Review B,

  54. [64]

    5188-5192

    13(12): p. 5188-5192

  55. [65]

    Burke, and M

    Perdew, J.P., K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Physical Review Letters, 1996. 77(18): p. 3865-3868

    1996

  56. [66]

    Non-covalent interactions in quantum chemistry and physics, 2017: p

    Goerigk, L., A comprehensive overview of the DFT-D3 London-dispersion correction. Non-covalent interactions in quantum chemistry and physics, 2017: p. 195-219

    2017

  57. [67]

    Fluckey, S. and W. Vandenberghe, Diamond two-phonon infrared absorption spectrum calculated from first principles using the finite displacement method. Applied Physics Letters, 2024. 124. 152203

    2024

  58. [68]

    Burke, and Y

    Perdew, J.P., K. Burke, and Y. Wang, Generalized gradient approximation for the exchange-correlation hole of a many-electron system. Physical Review B, 1996. 54(23): p. 16533-16539

    1996

  59. [69]

    Scientific Data,

    Naik, A.A., et al., A Quantum-Chemical Bonding Database for Solid-State Materials. Scientific Data,

  60. [70]

    Uberuaga, and H

    Henkelman, G., B.P. Uberuaga, and H. Jónsson, A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. The Journal of chemical physics, 2000. 113(22): p. 9901-9904

    2000

  61. [71]

    Sidler, D. and S. Riniker, Fast Nosé–Hoover thermostat: molecular dynamics in quasi-thermodynamic equilibrium. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2019. 21(11): p. 6059-6070

    2019

  62. [72]

    Kumar, A. and P. Parida, Unveiling the potential of a BCN-biphenylene monolayer as a high- performance anode material for alkali metal ion batteries: a first-principles study. Nanoscale, 2024. 16(27): p. 13131-13147

    2024

  63. [73]

    Jona, F. and P.M. Marcus, Magnesium under pressure: structure and phase transition. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2003. 15(45): p. 7727

    2003

  64. [74]

    Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, 1967

    Witt, W., Absolute Präzisionsbestimmung von Gitterkonstanten an Germanium- und Aluminium- Einkristallen mit Elektroneninterferenzen. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, 1967. 22(1): p. 92-95

    1967

  65. [75]

    Shirai, and H

    Masago, A., K. Shirai, and H. Katayama-Yoshida, Crystal stability of $\ensuremath{\alpha}$- and $\ensuremath{\beta}$-boron. Physical Review B, 2006. 73(10): p. 104102

    2006

  66. [76]

    ACS Omega, 2025

    Majid, A., et al., First-Principles Investigation of Lithium Titanate Oxide as an Anode Material in Li-, Na-, Mg-, Ca-, and K-Ion Batteries. ACS Omega, 2025. 10(30): p. 33645-33661

    2025

  67. [77]

    Nano Letters,

    Zhang, H., et al., Dirac State in the FeB2 Monolayer with Graphene-Like Boron Sheet. Nano Letters,

  68. [78]

    6124-6129

    16(10): p. 6124-6129

  69. [79]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012

    Zhang, Z., et al., Two-Dimensional Tetragonal TiC Monolayer Sheet and Nanoribbons. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012. 134(47): p. 19326-19329

    2012

  70. [80]

    Physical Review Letters, 2009

    Cahangirov, S., et al., Two- and One-Dimensional Honeycomb Structures of Silicon and Germanium. Physical Review Letters, 2009. 102(23): p. 236804

    2009

  71. [81]

    Molina-Sánchez, A. and L. Wirtz, Phonons in single-layer and few-layer MoS${}_{2}$ and WS${}_{2}$. Physical Review B, 2011. 84(15): p. 155413

    2011

  72. [82]

    Energy & Environmental Science, 2018

    Muy, S., et al., Tuning mobility and stability of lithium ion conductors based on lattice dynamics. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018. 11(4): p. 850-859

    2018

  73. [83]

    and F.-X

    Mouhat, F. and F.-X. Coudert, Necessary and sufficient elastic stability conditions in various crystal systems. Physical Review B, 2014. 90(22): p. 224104

    2014

  74. [84]

    Nano Letters, 2014

    Liu, K., et al., Elastic Properties of Chemical-Vapor-Deposited Monolayer MoS2, WS2, and Their Bilayer Heterostructures. Nano Letters, 2014. 14(9): p. 5097-5103

    2014

  75. [85]

    Materials Today Energy, 2020

    Abbas, G., et al., Two-dimensional B3P monolayer as a superior anode material for Li and Na ion batteries: a first-principles study. Materials Today Energy, 2020. 17: p. 100486

    2020

  76. [86]

    Computational Condensed Matter, 2017

    Zhang, Y., First principles prediction of two-dimensional tungsten carbide (W2C) monolayer and its Li storage capability. Computational Condensed Matter, 2017. 10: p. 35-38

    2017

  77. [87]

    Physical Review Research, 2024

    Lin, S., et al., Ultrahigh energy density BeN monolayer: A nodal-line semimetal anode for Li-ion batteries. Physical Review Research, 2024. 6(1): p. 013028

    2024

  78. [88]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2023

    Gao, S., et al., Twin-Graphene: A Promising Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries with Ultrahigh Specific Capacity. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2023. 127(29): p. 14065-14074

    2023

  79. [89]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012

    Tritsaris, G.A., et al., Diffusion of Lithium in Bulk Amorphous Silicon: A Theoretical Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012. 116(42): p. 22212-22216

    2012

  80. [90]

    Physical Review B, 2010

    Persson, K., et al., Thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the Li-graphite system from first- principles calculations. Physical Review B, 2010. 82(12): p. 125416

    2010

  81. [91]

    Electrochimica Acta, 2021

    He, Q., et al., Computational investigation of 2D 3d/4d hexagonal transition metal borides for metal-ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta, 2021. 384: p. 138404

    2021

  82. [92]

    Applied Surface Science, 2019

    Yuan, G., et al., Monolayer Zr2B2: A promising two-dimensional anode material for Li-ion batteries. Applied Surface Science, 2019. 480: p. 448-453

    2019

  83. [93]

    Applied Surface Science, 2021

    Wang, S.-F., et al., Theoretical investigation of Ti2B monolayer as powerful anode material for Li/Na batteries with high storage capacity. Applied Surface Science, 2021. 538: p. 148048

    2021

  84. [94]

    ChemPhysChem, 2017

    Lv, X., et al., Sc2C as a promising anode material with high mobility and capacity: a first‐principles study. ChemPhysChem, 2017. 18(12): p. 1627-1634

    2017

  85. [95]

    Applied Surface Science, 2020

    Zhang, X., et al., Mn2C monolayer: A superior anode material offering good conductivity, high storage capacity and ultrafast ion diffusion for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries. Applied Surface Science, 2020. 503: p. 144091

    2020

  86. [96]

    Applied Surface Science, 2020

    Wu, Y.-Y., et al., Two-dimensional tetragonal Ti2BN: A novel potential anode material for Li-ion batteries. Applied Surface Science, 2020. 513: p. 145821

    2020

  87. [97]

    RSC advances, 2016

    Hu, J., et al., Investigations on Nb 2 C monolayer as promising anode material for Li or non-Li ion batteries from first-principles calculations. RSC advances, 2016. 6(33): p. 27467-27474

    2016

  88. [98]

    Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 2020

    Belasfar, K., et al., First-principles study of BC3 monolayer as anodes for lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries applications. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 2020. 139: p. 109319

    2020

  89. [99]

    2D Materials,

    Rajput, K., et al., Ca2C MXene monolayer as a superior anode for metal-ion batteries. 2D Materials,

  90. [100]

    The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2016

    Sun, Q., et al., Ab initio prediction and characterization of Mo2C monolayer as anodes for lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries. The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2016. 7(6): p. 937-943

    2016

  91. [101]

    Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015

    Pan, H., Electronic properties and lithium storage capacities of two-dimensional transition-metal nitride monolayers. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015. 3(43): p. 21486-21493

    2015

  92. [102]

    J Phys Chem Lett, 2013

    Liu, Y., et al., Feasibility of Lithium Storage on Graphene and Its Derivatives. J Phys Chem Lett, 2013. 4(10): p. 1737-42

    2013

  93. [103]

    ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2023

    Patel, P., et al., Two-Dimensional α-SiX (X = N, P) Monolayers as Efficient Anode Material for Li-Ion Batteries: A First-Principles Study. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2023. 6(3): p. 2103-2115

    2023

  94. [104]

    Physical Review Applied, 2021

    Abdullahi, Y.Z., et al., Theoretical Screening of Metal Borocarbide Sheets for High-Capacity and High- Rate $\mathrm{Li}$- and $\mathrm{Na}$-Ion Batteries. Physical Review Applied, 2021. 16(2): p. 024031. Supporting Information (SI) Janus 𝐌𝐠𝐀𝐥𝐁𝟐 MBene: a dipole-engineered anod...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.