Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 15 references

Morphology-Property Interplay in Chemo-Mechanics of Ion-Intercalation Active Particles

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Lithiation paths and stresses in battery particles are set by the coupled interaction of shape, anisotropy, and constraint—not any one factor alone.

desk verdict Solid within-program computational study: the three-geometry × symmetry × constraint matrix plus flux/correlation diagnostics cleanly show when constraint vs anisotropy dominates; idealizations are disclosed and do not break the internal claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.03893 v1 pith:TH3ATWCQ submitted 2026-07-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-ph

Rongyue Lin , Royal C. Ihuaenyi , Juner Zhu , Ruobing Bai This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph
keywords chemo-mechanicalcouplingion-intercalationparticlesanisotropicdiffusivitymechanicalconstraintsmorphologyoptimizationVegardstrainfluxdecompositionParetofront
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks which combination of particle shape, material symmetry, and external mechanical constraint best controls how lithium enters an active particle and how much stress builds up. Using a thermodynamically consistent single-particle model, analytical solutions for spheres and cylinders, and multiphysics simulations for ellipsoids, the authors show that the answer is always the interaction: isotropic particles change their lithiation pattern when the boundary conditions change, while transversely isotropic particles keep a strongly heterogeneous pattern set by anisotropic diffusivity. Flux decomposition shows that mechanical driving of lithium transport is negligible in spheres but dominant in ellipsoids; concentration and volumetric strain are strongly anti-correlated when free and weakly correlated when fully constrained. Bayesian multi-objective optimization then finds hollow-ellipsoid shapes and crystal orientations that trade average lithium uptake against peak tensile stress. A sympathetic reader cares because electrode lifetime is limited by particle-level fracture and heterogeneous intercalation; the work supplies a unified map of when mechanics can be ignored and when morphology and crystal alignment must be designed together.

What carries the argument

A thermodynamically consistent chemo-mechanical single-particle framework (Helmholtz free energy split into elastic plus ideal-solution chemical energy, linear elasticity with Vegard transformation strain, mobility-driven flux) that yields analytical flux and stress expressions for spheres and cylinders and numerical solutions for ellipsoids, plus flux-decomposition ratios and a Pearson concentration–volumetric-strain correlation used as cross-field diagnostics, culminating in Bayesian multi-objective optimization of hollow-ellipsoid geometry and crystal angle.

What would settle it

In-situ imaging of lithium concentration and strain inside hollow isotropic versus transversely isotropic ellipsoidal particles under controlled outer constraints: if isotropic particles do not become more homogeneous under full constraint, or if the mechanical flux contribution remains negligible in ellipsoids, the central coupling claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The transient lithiation pathway and the associated stress and strain fields are governed not by morphology, property, or constraint alone, but by their coupled interaction: isotropic particles are constraint-sensitive, whereas transversely isotropic particles exhibit persistent heterogeneous lithiation dominated by anisotropic diffusivity. The mechanical contribution to lithium flux is negligible in spheres yet dominant in ellipsoids, and concentration–strain correlation flips from strong anti-correlation (unconstrained) to weak correlation (fully constrained).

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes ideal lithium–vacancy mixing with no phase separation, concentration-independent properties, and small-strain linear elasticity that neglects grain-boundary incompatibility; if real particles phase-separate, soften, or crack along grains, both the predicted maps and the stress–capacity trade-off can change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For near-spherical isotropic particles, reaction–diffusion models without stress feedback remain adequate for lithiation kinetics.
  • For non-spherical or anisotropic particles, mechanical contributions to flux must be retained or the concentration field will be wrong.
  • Crystal orientation and void geometry can be co-optimized to raise capacity while lowering peak tensile stress along a Pareto front.
  • External mechanical constraint is a design lever: full constraint homogenizes isotropic particles but leaves anisotropic lithiation patterns largely intact.
  • Cross-field diagnostics (flux ratios, concentration–strain correlation) give quantitative tests for when deformation measurements can infer lithiation state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same framework could be re-run with concentration-dependent moduli or simple phase-field free energies to test how far the sphere-versus-ellipsoid flux dichotomy survives once soft modes or phase separation appear.
  • Pareto morphologies found for LCO-like Vegard tensors may shift for NMC or LFP, so material-specific re-optimization is a direct next experiment.
  • The strong free-particle anti-correlation suggests that optical or diffraction strain maps of isolated particles can serve as low-cost proxies for local state of charge, provided constraint is known.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a thermodynamically consistent single-particle chemo-mechanical model and applies it to hollow spherical, cylindrical, and ellipsoidal particles with isotropic or transversely isotropic stiffness, diffusivity, and Vegard tensors under fully constrained, inner-free, and unconstrained mechanical boundary conditions. Combining analytical solutions (spheres, cylinders) with multiphysics simulations (ellipsoids), the authors argue that transient lithiation pathways and stress/strain fields are controlled by the coupled interaction of morphology, material symmetry, and constraint: isotropic particles are constraint-sensitive, while transversely isotropic particles show persistent heterogeneous lithiation dominated by anisotropic diffusivity. Flux decomposition indicates that the mechanical contribution to Li flux is negligible in isotropic spheres but dominant in ellipsoids; Pearson correlation between concentration and volumetric strain is strong under free boundaries and weak under full constraint. Bayesian multi-objective optimization of hollow ellipsoids then yields Pareto morphologies trading average lithiation against peak tensile stress.

Significance. If the reported coupling picture holds within the stated single-phase, small-strain setting, the work supplies a useful organizing framework for particle-level electrode design: when mechanical feedback on transport can be neglected (isotropic spheres), when constraint must be treated as a first-order control (isotropic ellipsoids), and when anisotropic diffusivity overrides constraint (TI ellipsoids). The analytical spherical/cylindrical solutions, Fickian cross-checks (Appendix A), explicit flux decomposition (Eqs. 39–42, Fig. 5), and correlation metric (Eq. 43) are concrete, reusable diagnostics rather than purely qualitative narrative. The Pareto morphology study is a clear step from mechanism to design, even if limited to one constraint/material case. The contribution is incremental relative to the Larché–Cahn tradition and prior particle stress models, but the systematic morphology–property–constraint matrix and the sphere-versus-ellipsoid mechanical-flux contrast are of genuine interest to the chemo-mechanics and battery-materials communities.

major comments (3)
  1. The abstract and §6 state a general dichotomy—isotropic particles are constraint-sensitive, TI particles are diffusivity-dominated—yet the full-field evidence for that dichotomy is essentially confined to ellipsoids (Figs. 3–4). Spheres are treated only as isotropic (§3.1); cylinders receive elastic-energy and axial stress/strain results (Figs. 2b–c, Table 2) but not concentration maps comparable to Figs. 3–4. Either provide cylinder concentration fields under the same BC suite or narrow the claim so it is explicitly ellipsoid-centered rather than morphology-general.
  2. §4.1 and Fig. 5 assert that mechanical flux dominance is an “intrinsic characteristic of the ellipsoidal morphology.” That conclusion is drawn from a single LCO parameter set (Table 1). Because Jm scales with Cijkl βmn and the chemical term with RT cmax/(cmax−c), the Cc/Cm balance can shift with |β|, stiffness, or temperature. A short sensitivity check (e.g., scaled |β| or isotropic β only) is needed before morphology-intrinsic language is retained; otherwise rephrase as “dominant for the LCO-like parameters studied.”
  3. Chemical BCs impose insertion only on the outer surface and zero flux on the inner surface (§3, before §3.1). For hollow particles this choice can itself drive radial heterogeneity and interact with the “inner-free” mechanical BC that produces the strongest isotropic anisotropy in Fig. 3b. The manuscript should justify the zero-inner-flux assumption against electrolyte access to the cavity (common in hollow secondary particles) and, at minimum, discuss how two-sided insertion would alter the constraint-sensitivity ranking.
minor comments (6)
  1. Table 2: state of charge / time at which axial stress and strain are reported is not specified; please add ⟨c⟩/cmax or t.
  2. Fig. 2 mixes total elastic energy (J) for spheres/ellipsoids with energy per unit length (J/m) for cylinders; a brief note in the caption would prevent over-comparison.
  3. §5 reports 400 trials in the text and 300 evaluations in Fig. 8; reconcile the computational budget.
  4. Notation: ˜c = c−c0 is used in free-energy/flux equations while figures use xLi = c/cmax and ⟨c⟩/cmax; a short symbol table or consistent usage would help.
  5. Eq. (25) and related isotropic flux expressions: confirm sign conventions for negative Ω/β (contraction on lithiation) are stated once near Table 1 so anti-correlation ρεc ≈ −1 is immediately readable.
  6. Typos/style: “intergranularfractureusuallyoccurs” and similar missing spaces in §2; “photochemical-inducedphasetransitions” in references—clean copyedit pass.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: lithiation pathways, flux ratios, correlations, and Pareto morphologies are outputs of stated PDEs with literature material constants, not fits or self-definitional predictions.

full rationale

The paper’s load-bearing chain is: (i) a thermodynamically consistent free-energy and flux law (Eqs. 1–17, 39–41) with ideal mixing and linear elasticity; (ii) literature material constants (Table 1: E, ν, Cijkl, D, β from Wiedemann, Reimers & Dahn, Mücke, Yamakawa, Uxa, etc.); (iii) analytical spherical/cylindrical solutions and COMSOL ellipsoidal multiphysics under three BC classes; (iv) post-processed diagnostics (global flux ratios Cα, Pearson ρεc) and TPE multi-objective search over geometry/orientation. None of the central claims—constraint-sensitivity of isotropic ellipsoids, diffusivity-dominated TI heterogeneity, mechanical flux negligible in spheres but dominant in ellipsoids, anti-correlation under free BCs—are obtained by fitting those same quantities to data and renaming the fit a prediction. Sphere mechanical-flux cancellation follows algebraically from isotropic volumetric strain tracking Ωc/3 under spherical symmetry (explicitly shown vs Fickian, Fig. A.10), which is a model consequence, not a circular definition. Self-citations (Bai elastic-energy form; Ihuaenyi TPE/specimen-design and cross-field diagnostics) supply methods and motivation; they do not import a uniqueness theorem that forces the morphology–constraint conclusions. Optimization maximizes model-computed c̄ave and minimizes model-computed σ1,max—Pareto points are design outputs of the same PDE system, not external targets fitted then “predicted.” Scope limits (no phase separation, concentration-independent properties, no GB incompatibility) are disclosed assumptions, not circular reductions. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on a reduced continuum chemo-mechanical model with standard continuum axioms plus domain idealizations that deliberately exclude phase separation, plasticity, fracture, and grain boundaries. Material numbers are taken from cited experiments rather than fitted here; geometric and rate choices are modeling conventions. No new physical entities are postulated—only analysis metrics (flux ratio, Pearson correlation) and optimized design vectors.

free parameters (5)
  • Hollow radius ratio r0/R0
    Fixed at 0.6 for sphere/cylinder baselines without a data-driven selection; shapes the stress and energy curves in §3.
  • Ellipsoid outer aspect ratio aout/cout and baseline void geometry
    Baseline aout/cout=0.5, ain=cin=2 µm, py=0 chosen as representative irregular morphology before optimization; affects reported concentration fields.
  • Boundary flux form j=j0·2√(c̄(1−c̄)) at 1C
    Reduced site-availability surrogate for intercalation kinetics (Allen et al. style), not full Butler–Volmer; sets the charging protocol for all comparisons.
  • LCO anisotropic Vegard and diffusivity components (βa, βc, Da, Dc)
    Taken from cited XRD/diffusion literature (Table 1); not refit here, but the TI vs isotropic contrast and mechanical-flux dominance claims depend on these numerical values.
  • Optimization bounds tmin, Vin/Vout range, trial budget
    tmin=0.1 µm, void volume 0.01–95%, 300–400 TPE trials define the admissible design space and search depth for Pareto results.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Small-strain linear elasticity throughout lithiation; no plasticity or fracture.
    Stated in §2 mechanical assumptions; justified by ~5% deformation in layered oxides and intergranular fracture before bulk plasticity.
  • domain assumption Ideal Li–vacancy solution: no phase separation, no short-range order, mixing entropy only.
    §2 electrochemical assumptions; enables closed-form chemical potential (Eq. 16) and isolates morphology–property coupling.
  • domain assumption Quasi-static mechanical equilibrium; isopotential particle (electron transport much faster than Li diffusion).
    §2 timescale estimate τe≪τLi; drops electric potential from bulk equations.
  • domain assumption Linear Vegard transformation strain εchem=β(c−c0); concentration-independent C and D.
    Eqs. 13–20 and Table 1; standard but known to be approximate for real LCO lattice evolution.
  • standard math Flux linear in ∇μ with positive-definite mobility (Nernst–Einstein).
    Eq. 10; ensures dW/dt≤0 under mechanical equilibrium.
  • ad hoc to paper Idealized mechanical BCs (fully constrained / inner-free / unconstrained) represent electrode environments.
    §3 opening; real porous-electrode constraints are heterogeneous; these three cases are modeling surrogates.
  • domain assumption Polycrystalline secondary particle treated as effective continuum without grain-boundary incompatibility.
    Explicit limitation in §2; enables analytical/semi-analytical focus on morphology–property interplay.
invented entities (2)
  • Global flux ratio Cα (chemical vs mechanical contribution)
    purpose: Scalar diagnostic to quantify signed mechanical vs Fickian share of total Li flux over the particle volume.
    Defined in §4.1 Eq. 42; analysis tool, not a new physical field. Independent evidence is definitional only.
  • Pearson metric ρεc between volumetric strain and Li concentration
    purpose: Quantify spatial co-variation of deformation and lithiation under different constraints.
    §4.2 Eq. 43; standard statistic applied as a cross-field diagnostic, not a new material entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Morphology-Property Interplay in Chemo-Mechanics of Ion-Intercalation Active Particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TH3ATWCQ

@misc{pith2026260703893,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Morphology-Property Interplay in Chemo-Mechanics of Ion-Intercalation Active Particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TH3ATWCQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03893}
}
read the original abstract

Morphology, material property, and mechanical constraint jointly govern the chemo-mechanical behavior of ion-intercalation particles, yet their coupled effects remain insufficiently understood. Here we establish a thermodynamically consistent single-particle framework and combine analytical solutions with multiphysics simulations to determine how these factors regulate lithiation and stress generation. We study hollow spherical, cylindrical, and ellipsoidal particles with isotropic or transversely isotropic material properties under fully constrained, inner-free, or unconstrained boundary conditions. We show that the transient lithiation pathway and the associated stress and strain fields are governed not by morphology, property, or constraint alone, but by their coupled interaction: isotropic particles are sensitive to the mechanical constraint, whereas transversely isotropic particles exhibit persistent heterogeneous lithiation dominated by anisotropic diffusivity. Flux decomposition analysis reveals that the mechanical contribution to Li flux is negligible in spheres but dominant in ellipsoids. Correlation analysis further shows that Li concentration and volumetric strain exhibit strong anti-correlation in unconstrained particles but weak correlation under full constraints. Bayesian optimization of hollow ellipsoids identifies Pareto-optimal morphologies that balance lithiation capacity against peak tensile stress. These results provide a unified framework for the morphology-property interplay in intercalation particles and offer morphology design principles for chemo-mechanical stability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03893 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of a representative electrode particle subjected to a mechanical load [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Evolution of elastic energy as a function of normalized volume-averaged Li concentration, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Full fields of normalized Li concentration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Full fields of normalized Li concentration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution of global flux ratio Cα as a function of normalized volume-averaged Li concentration, ⟨c⟩/cmax, in (a) fully constrained, (b) inner-free, and (c) unconstrained isotropic ellipsoidal particles, as well as (d) fully constrained, (e) inner-free, and (f) unconstr…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Pearson correlation metric to quantify spatial co-variation between the volumetric strain field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Representative fields of volumetric strain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Sequential trial histories of morphology optimization of the inner-free transversely isotropic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Multi-objective optimization results from Pareto analysis and the corresponding morphologies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chan, C.K., Peng, H., Liu, G., McIlwrath, K., Zhang, X.F., Huggins, R.A., Cui, Y.,

    URL:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020768314004259, doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.11.006. Chan, C.K., Peng, H., Liu, G., McIlwrath, K., Zhang, X.F., Huggins, R.A., Cui, Y.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.11.006 2014

  2. [2]

    Nature Nan- otechnology 3, 31–35

    High-performance lithium battery anodes using silicon nanowires. Nature Nan- otechnology 3, 31–35. URL:https://www.nature.com/articles/nnano.2007.411, doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.411. Cho, J., Kim, Y.J., Park, B., 2001. LiCoO[sub 2] Cathode Material That Does Not Show a Phase Transition from Hexagonal to Monoclinic Phase. Journal of The Electrochem- ical Socie...

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.411 2007

  3. [3]

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 23, 8200–8221

    Lithium ion battery degradation: what you need to know. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 23, 8200–8221. URL:http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D1CP00359C, doi:10.1039/D1CP00359C. Fang, R., Li, W., Jiao, J., Zhao, L., Yao, Y., Zhu, J., 2024. Modeling the electro-chemo-mechanical failure at the lithium-solid electrolyte interface: Void evolution and lithium penet...

    doi:10.1039/d1cp00359c 2024

  4. [4]

    InternationalJournalofSolidsandStructures184, 24–39

    Electro-chemo-mechanical simulation for lithium ion batteries across the scales. InternationalJournalofSolidsandStructures184, 24–39. URL:https://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020768319302239, doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019. 05.002. Hu, B., Zhao, Y., 2025. Evaluating the Effects of Grain Anisotropy on the Effective Chemo-Mechanical Properties of Se...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019 2019

  5. [5]

    Acta Materialia 238, 118229

    Tuning of surface morphology in Li layered oxide cathode materials. Acta Materialia 238, 118229. URL:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S1359645422006097, doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118229. Kang, H., Lee, J., Rodgers, T., Shim, J.H., Lee, S., 2019. Electrical Conductivity of Delithiated Lithium Cobalt Oxides: Conductive Atomic Force Microscopy ...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118229 2022

  6. [6]

    ACS Omega 6, 21255–21264

    Intrinsic Defects in LiMn 2O4: First-Principles Calculations. ACS Omega 6, 21255–21264. URL:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.1c01162, doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c01162. publisher: American Chemical Society (ACS). Liu, S., West, P.J., Zhong, H., Bai, J., Stavitski, E., Leshchev, D., Marschilok, A.C., Takeuchi, E.S., Bock, D.C., Takeuchi, K.J., 2023. Or...

    work page doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c01162 2023

  7. [7]

    Malavé, V., Berger, J., Zhu, H., Kee, R.J., 2014

    URL:http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D1EE01388B, doi:10.1039/D1EE01388B. Malavé, V., Berger, J., Zhu, H., Kee, R.J., 2014. A Computational Model of the Mechan- ical Behavior within Reconstructed LixCoO2 Li-ion Battery Cathode Particles. Elec- trochimica Acta 130, 707–717. URL:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0013468614006264, doi:10.1016/j.electact...

    work page doi:10.1039/d1ee01388b 2014

  8. [8]

    Mikami, M., Saito, J., Ochiai, T., Takahashi, M., Takahashi, T., Momma, Y., Kuriki, K., Wada, R., Yokomizo, K., Kobayashi, G., Komaba, S., Yamazaki, S., 2024

    URL:https://www.nature.com/articles/s43246-023-00418-8, doi:10.1038/ s43246-023-00418-8. Mikami, M., Saito, J., Ochiai, T., Takahashi, M., Takahashi, T., Momma, Y., Kuriki, K., Wada, R., Yokomizo, K., Kobayashi, G., Komaba, S., Yamazaki, S., 2024. Controlling 42 lithium cobalt oxide phase transition using molten fluoride salt for improved lithium- ion bat...

    work page doi:10.1038/s43246-024-00543-y 2024

Show all 15 references
  1. [9]

    Shishvan, S., Fleck, N., McMeeking, R., Deshpande, V., 2020

    URL:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0013468615307180, doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.135. Shishvan, S., Fleck, N., McMeeking, R., Deshpande, V., 2020. Dendrites as climb- ing dislocations in ceramic electrolytes: Initiation of growth. Journal of Power Sources 45...

    2015 doi

  2. [10]

    Tukamoto, H., West, A.R., 1997

    URL:https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C8EE00001H, doi:10.1039/C8EE00001H. Tukamoto, H., West, A.R., 1997. Electronic Conductivity of LiCoO2 and Its Enhance- ment by Magnesium Doping. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 144, 3164–3168. URL:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149...

    1997 doi

  3. [11]

    45 Chemical Reviews 122, 13043–13107

    Chemomechanics of Rechargeable Batteries: Status, Theories, and Perspectives. 45 Chemical Reviews 122, 13043–13107. URL:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ acs.chemrev.2c00002, doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00002. Wang, X., Loa, I., Kunc, K., Syassen, K., Amboage, M., 2005. Effect o...

    2005 doi

  4. [12]

    Xu, X., Huo, H., Jian, J., Wang, L., Zhu, H., Xu, S., He, X., Yin, G., Du, C., Sun, X., 2019b

    URL:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022509619303126, doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2019.05.003. Xu, X., Huo, H., Jian, J., Wang, L., Zhu, H., Xu, S., He, X., Yin, G., Du, C., Sun, X., 2019b. Radially Oriented Single-Crystal Primary Nanosheets Enable Ul- trahigh Rate and Cy...

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    Yan, P., Zheng, J., Gu, M., Xiao, J., Zhang, J.G., Wang, C.M., 2017

    URL:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167273817309761, doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2018.02.013. Yan, P., Zheng, J., Gu, M., Xiao, J., Zhang, J.G., Wang, C.M., 2017. Intragranular cracking as a critical barrier for high-voltage usage of layer-structured cathode for lithium-i...

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    Yasuhara, S., Yasui, S., Teranishi, T., Yoshikawa, Y., Taniyama, T., Itoh, M., 2019

    URL:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378775319303234, doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.076. Yasuhara, S., Yasui, S., Teranishi, T., Yoshikawa, Y., Taniyama, T., Itoh, M., 2019. The effect of relative permittivity of surface supporting materials for high-speed recha...

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    Zhao, Y., Wang, R., Martínez-Pañeda, E., 2022

    URL:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378775318313624, doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.011. Zhao, Y., Wang, R., Martínez-Pañeda, E., 2022. A phase field electro-chemo- mechanical formulation for predicting void evolution at the Li–electrolyte in- terface in all-sol...

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.