Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 76 references

Disentangling Haldane Phase by Generalized Clifford Circuits

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Optimized Clifford disentanglers for the Haldane phase are the generalized Kramers–Wannier map, turning SPT order into Z2 symmetry breaking.

desk verdict Solid analytic result: sequential two-site Clifford disentangling of the Haldane phase recovers the generalized KW map, proved optimal for AKLT and shown to expose only a single Z2 of the hidden SSB, distinct from KT. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.03939 v1 pith:P6ANFLD5 submitted 2026-07-04 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el

Minsoo Kim , Changhun Oh , Donghoon Kim This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords HaldanephaseAKLTstateCliffordcircuitsCAMPSKramers-Wanniertransformationsymmetry-protectedtopologicalorderZ2spontaneoussymmetrybreakingmatrixproductstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Disentangling circuits make quantum many-body ground states cheaper to simulate classically by stripping out entanglement before a matrix-product-state representation is built. This paper asks what those circuits actually look like for the Haldane phase of spin-1 chains, a textbook symmetry-protected topological phase. Extending the Clifford-augmented DMRG method to qutrits, the authors find that the gates selected by the optimizer are precisely the successive factors of the generalized Kramers–Wannier transformation. For the exactly solvable AKLT point they prove that this choice is optimal among all two-site Clifford gates when the circuit is built sequentially from an open boundary. The same unitary maps the Haldane phase onto a phase with spontaneous Z2 symmetry breaking, revealing a hidden order that is distinct from the better-known Kennedy–Tasaki duality. The result therefore supplies both a practical speed-up for classical simulation and a new circuit-level bridge from topological order to ordinary symmetry breaking.

What carries the argument

The generalized Kramers–Wannier unitary U_KW formed by the ordered product of two-site gates U_j,j+1 = X_{j+1}^2 U_SUM; it simultaneously minimizes bipartite entanglement of the AKLT (and Haldane) MPS and conjugates the Haldane Hamiltonian into a local model whose only bulk on-site product symmetry is a spontaneously broken Z2.

What would settle it

Show that some other two-site Clifford gate (or a non-sequential arrangement of Clifford gates) yields strictly lower entanglement entropy than U_KW for the exact AKLT MPS under the same left-to-right sweep, or that the long-distance correlator of S^z after the KW map fails to approach 1/4.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within the sequential two-site Clifford disentangling ansatz, the product of gates U_j,j+1 = X_{j+1}^2 U_SUM is an optimal local disentangler for the Haldane phase; it is rigorously optimal for the AKLT state and maps that phase onto a Z2 spontaneous-symmetry-breaking phase generated by the global operator X = ∏ e^{iπ S^x_j}.

Load-bearing premise

The optimality claim holds only inside the restricted class of sequential two-site Clifford gates applied from an open boundary; no two-site Clifford gate can reduce entanglement between two bulk AKLT tensors.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends CAMPS-based DMRG to qutrit (spin-1) systems and shows that the optimized sequential two-site Clifford disentanglers for the Haldane phase of the Heisenberg and bilinear-biquadratic models implement the generalized Kramers–Wannier (KW) transformation U_KW = ∏ U_{j,j+1} with U_{j,j+1} = X_{j+1}^2 U_SUM_{j,j+1}. For the AKLT state the authors introduce a (u,v;a)-canonical form, prove that U_{j,j+1} preserves it while minimizing the Schmidt spectrum among the 90 inequivalent two-qutrit Cliffords whenever a lies in [4/9,2/3], and show that the recurrence a_{j+1}=(2-a_j)/3 keeps the parameter inside that interval (SM §S4, Prop. 1, Lem. 3, Thm. 1). They further demonstrate that the same unitary maps the Haldane SPT phase onto a phase with spontaneously broken Z_2 symmetry generated by X=∏ e^{iπ S^x_j}, distinct from the full Z_2×Z_2 breaking uncovered by the Kennedy–Tasaki transformation, and support the claim with order-parameter calculations and explicit edge-spin actions.

Significance. The work supplies a rare analytic understanding of why a particular Clifford circuit emerges as the optimal disentangler inside the CAMPS-DMRG ansatz, rather than treating the circuit as a purely numerical black box. The optimality proof for AKLT is self-contained (canonical-form propagation + majorization over the 90 Clifford classes) and the numerical recovery of the same circuit on Heisenberg and BLBQ is consistent. The partial Z_2 SSB characterization, verified both by long-range order of S^z and by the action of X and Z_R on edge spins, offers a new unitary route from SPT order to symmetry breaking that is distinct from the Kennedy–Tasaki map. These results strengthen the physical interpretability of hybrid Clifford–tensor-network methods and are of clear interest to the quantum many-body and tensor-network communities.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Discussion] The restriction of optimality to sequential two-site Clifford gates that must start from an open boundary is stated clearly in SM §S4 and the End Matter, but a short explicit sentence in the main-text Discussion would help readers who do not consult the supplement.
  2. [Fig. 2] Figure 2 insets showing E(N-1)=0 are useful; a brief cross-reference to Lemma 1 of the SM in the caption would make the vanishing immediately transparent.
  3. [Characterization of the KW-transformed Haldane phase] The comparison with the Kennedy–Tasaki transformation is accurate, yet a single sentence noting that U_KT is non-Clifford (already shown in SM §S6.C) would sharpen the contrast for readers of the main text.
  4. A few typographical inconsistencies appear in the arXiv version (e.g., “eH” versus “\tilde H”, occasional missing spaces around operators); a light copy-edit pass would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: AKLT optimality is a self-contained SVD/majorization proof inside an openly stated sequential two-site Clifford ansatz; KW identification and Z2-SSB mapping are independent calculations, not definitional renamings.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain does not reduce to its inputs by construction. Optimality of U_KW for the AKLT state is proved from first principles: (u,v;a)-canonical form is defined from the AKLT tensors, Proposition 1 shows U_j,j+1 propagates that form with a_{j+1}=(2-a_j)/3, the 90 inequivalent two-qutrit Cliffords are partitioned by characteristic polynomials of F(ν,a) (Table S2), and Lemma 3/Theorem 1 establish majorization of Schmidt spectra by the SUM-type gate for a∈[4/9,2/3], with the recurrence keeping a in that interval. No parameter is fitted and then re-predicted. The numerical CAMPS-DMRG recovery of the same circuit on Heisenberg/BLBQ is corroboration, not a circular premise. Mapping to Z2 SSB follows from explicit conjugation of local terms, classification of G_prod(ẽH), and transfer-matrix evaluation of ⟨S^z_j⟩ and ⟨S^z_j S^z_{j+r}⟩ on the KW-transformed AKLT state—none of which is defined in terms of the claimed SSB. Coincidence with the known generalized KW duality is noted after the optimality proof, not used as a uniqueness import. The sequential two-site, boundary-initiated ansatz is the CAMPS setting and is stated openly (including that bulk AKLT bonds cannot be disentangled by any two-site Clifford); that is a scope restriction, not circularity. Self-citations are methodological (CAMPS-DMRG) or comparative (KT) and are not load-bearing uniqueness theorems. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The work rests on standard definitions of the qutrit Clifford group, MPS representations of the AKLT state, and the known existence of the Haldane phase; no free parameters are fitted and no new physical entities are postulated. The only paper-specific construct is the (u,v;a)-canonical form used to track the Schmidt spectrum under successive gates.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math The two-qutrit Clifford group modulo local unitaries contains exactly 90 inequivalent gates that can affect bipartite entanglement (computed via |Sp(4,F3)|/|Sp(2,F3)|^2).
    Used throughout the optimality search; standard group-order formula.
  • domain assumption The AKLT state admits an exact bond-dimension-2 MPS representation whose bulk tensors are the standard projectors from two spin-1/2 virtual spins onto the spin-1 physical space.
    Standard VBS construction (Affleck et al. 1987); invoked for the analytic proof.
  • ad hoc to paper A sequential left-to-right (or right-to-left) sweep of two-site Clifford gates is a sufficient variational ansatz for the optimal local disentangler.
    The paper shows bulk bonds cannot be disentangled by any two-site Clifford, so the boundary-initiated sequential form is essential to the claim.
invented entities (1)
  • (u,v;a)-canonical form of a site tensor
    purpose: Tracks the Schmidt spectrum under successive application of U_j,j+1 and proves that the form is preserved with a simple recurrence a_{j+1}=(2-a_j)/3.
    Technical device introduced solely for the optimality proof; no independent physical status claimed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Disentangling Haldane Phase by Generalized Clifford Circuits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P6ANFLD5

@misc{pith2026260703939,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Disentangling Haldane Phase by Generalized Clifford Circuits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P6ANFLD5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03939}
}
abstract

Disentangling transformations play a central role in the classical simulation of quantum many-body systems, yet their analytic structure and underlying mechanism remain largely unexplored. Here, we study the structure of the disentangler in the Haldane phase of spin-1 systems using generalized Clifford circuits. To this end, we extend the Clifford-circuit-augmented matrix product states (CAMPS)-based density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method to spin-1 systems. Within this framework, we find that the local disentanglers optimized for the Haldane phase implement the generalized Kramers--Wannier (KW) transformation, and we analytically verify its optimality for the Affleck--Kennedy--Lieb--Tasaki (AKLT) state. Beyond reducing entanglement, the KW transformation maps the Haldane phase to a phase with spontaneously broken $\mathbb{Z}_{2}$ symmetry. This mapping is distinct from the Kennedy--Tasaki transformation and provides a new unitary route from symmetry-protected topological order to symmetry breaking.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03939 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the CAMPS-based DMRG method. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The CAMPS-based DMRG results for the Heisen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Numerical results of the two-point correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entan- gled quantum computations, Phys

    G. Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entan- gled quantum computations, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 147902 (2003)

    2003

  2. [2]

    Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quan- tum many-body systems, Phys

    G. Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quan- tum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 040502 (2004)

    2004

  3. [3]

    Verstraete and J

    F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product states rep- resent ground states faithfully, Phys. Rev. B73, 094423 (2006)

    2006

  4. [4]

    M. B. Hastings, An area law for one-dimensional quan- tum systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P08024

    2007

  5. [5]

    Verstraete, V

    F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix prod- uct states, projected entangled pair states, and varia- tional renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems, Adv. Phys.57, 143 (2008)

    2008

  6. [6]

    Schuch, M

    N. Schuch, M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, En- tropy scaling and simulability by matrix product states, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 030504 (2008)

    2008

  7. [7]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio,Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010)

    2010

  8. [8]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys.326, 96 (2011)

    2011

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Or´ us, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann

    R. Or´ us, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann. Phys.349, 117 (2014)

    2014

  2. [10]

    Vidal, Entanglement renormalization, Phys

    G. Vidal, Entanglement renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 220405 (2007)

    2007

  3. [11]

    Vidal, Class of quantum many-body states that can be efficiently simulated, Phys

    G. Vidal, Class of quantum many-body states that can be efficiently simulated, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 110501 6 (2008)

    2008

  4. [12]

    Evenbly and G

    G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Algorithms for entanglement renormalization, Phys. Rev. B79, 144108 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Evenbly and G

    G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Entanglement renormalization in two spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 180406 (2009)

    2009

  6. [14]

    R. N. C. Pfeifer, G. Evenbly, and G. Vidal, Entanglement renormalization, scale invariance, and quantum critical- ity, Phys. Rev. A79, 040301(R) (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    Vidal, Entanglement renormalization: An intro- duction, inUnderstanding Quantum Phase Transitions, edited by L

    G. Vidal, Entanglement renormalization: An intro- duction, inUnderstanding Quantum Phase Transitions, edited by L. D. Carr (Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton,

  8. [16]

    Evenbly and G

    G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Tensor network renormaliza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 180405 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Evenbly and G

    G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Tensor network renormaliza- tion yields the multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 200401 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Evenbly and G

    G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Local scale transformations on the lattice with tensor network renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 040401 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Evenbly, Algorithms for tensor network renormaliza- tion, Phys

    G. Evenbly, Algorithms for tensor network renormaliza- tion, Phys. Rev. B95, 045117 (2017)

    2017

  12. [21]

    Raussendorf and H

    R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, A one-way quantum computer, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5188 (2001)

    2001

  13. [22]

    M. Hein, J. Eisert, and H.-J. Briegel, Multiparty entan- glement in graph states, Phys. Rev. A69, 062311 (2004)

    2004

  14. [23]

    Aaronson and D

    S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. A70, 052328 (2004)

    2004

  15. [24]

    Hostens, J

    E. Hostens, J. Dehaene, and B. De Moor, Stabilizer states and Clifford operations for systems of arbitrary dimen- sions and modular arithmetic, Phys. Rev. A71, 042315 (2005)

    2005

  16. [25]

    J. M. Farinholt, An ideal characterization of the Clifford operators, J. Phys. A47, 305303 (2014)

    2014

  17. [26]

    X. Qian, J. Huang, and M. Qin, Augmenting density ma- trix renormalization group with Clifford circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 190402 (2024)

    2024

  18. [27]

    Huang, X

    J. Huang, X. Qian, and M. Qin, Clifford circuits aug- mented matrix product states for fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 205106 (2025)

    2025

  19. [28]

    A. F. Mello, A. Santini, and M. Collura, Hybrid stabilizer matrix product operator, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 150604 (2024)

    2024

  20. [29]

    Masot-Llima and A

    S. Masot-Llima and A. Garcia-Saez, Stabilizer tensor net- works: Universal quantum simulator on a basis of stabi- lizer states, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 230601 (2024)

    2024

  21. [30]

    A. F. Mello, A. Santini, G. Lami, J. De Nardis, and M. Collura, Clifford dressed time-dependent variational principle, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 150403 (2025)

    2025

  22. [31]

    Masot-Llima, P

    S. Masot-Llima, P. Sierant, P. Stornati, and A. Garcia- Saez, Limits of Clifford disentangling in tensor network states, arXiv:2602.15942

  23. [32]

    Liu and B

    Z. Liu and B. K. Clark, Classical simulability of Clifford+Tcircuits with Clifford-augmented matrix product states, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023116 (2026)

    2026

  24. [33]

    S. M. Li, M. Mosca, N. J. Ross, J. van de Wetering, and Y. Zhao, A complete and natural rule set for multi-qutrit Clifford circuits, arXiv:2508.14670

  25. [34]

    Harper, A

    B. Harper, A. C. Nakhl, T. Quella, M. Sevior, and M. Us- man, GCAMPS: A scalable classical simulator for qudit systems, inProceedings of the Supercomputing Asia and International Conference on High Performance Comput- ing in Asia Pacific Region(Association for Computing Machin...

    2026

  26. [35]

    Kabir, S

    A. Kabir, S. Nguyen, S. Ghosh, J. Keppens, T. Kiran, I. H. Kim, Y. Huang, and B. Sor´ ee, Sdim: A qudit sta- bilizer simulator, arXiv:2511.12777

    arXiv

  27. [36]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2863 (1992)

    1992

  28. [37]

    S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. B48, 10345 (1993)

    1993

  29. [38]

    X. Qian, J. Huang, and M. Qin, Clifford circuits aug- mented time-dependent variational principle, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 150404 (2025)

    2025

  30. [39]

    Yosprakob, W.-L

    A. Yosprakob, W.-L. Tu, T. Okubo, K. Okunishi, and D. Kim, Clifford circuits augmented Grassmann matrix product states, arXiv:2510.04164

    arXiv

  31. [41]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Nonlinear field theory of large-spin Heisenberg antiferromagnets: Semiclassically quantized solitons of the one-dimensional easy-axis N´ eel state, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1153 (1983)

    1983

  32. [42]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Rig- orous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 799 (1987)

    1987

  33. [43]

    den Nijs and K

    M. den Nijs and K. Rommelse, Preroughening transitions in crystal surfaces and valence-bond phases in quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B40, 4709 (1989)

    1989

  34. [45]

    Kennedy and H

    T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, HiddenZ 2 ×Z 2 symmetry breaking in Haldane-gap antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 45, 304 (1992)

    1992

  35. [46]

    Pollmann, A

    F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa, Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one di- mension, Phys. Rev. B81, 064439 (2010)

    2010

  36. [47]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B83, 035107 (2011)

    2011

  37. [48]

    Pollmann, E

    F. Pollmann, E. Berg, A. M. Turner, and M. Os- hikawa, Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. B85, 075125 (2012)

    2012

  38. [49]

    Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Qudits and high-dimensional quantum computing, Front. Phys. 8, 589504 (2020)

    2020

  39. [50]

    ¨Ostlund and S

    S. ¨Ostlund and S. Rommer, Thermodynamic limit of den- sity matrix renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3537 (1995)

    1995

  40. [51]

    J. I. Cirac, D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, N. Schuch, and F. Ver- straete, Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 045003 (2021)

    2021

  41. [52]

    Supplemental Material

  42. [53]

    L¨ auchli, G

    A. L¨ auchli, G. Schmid, and S. Trebst, Spin nematics cor- relations in bilinear-biquadraticS= 1 spin chains, Phys. Rev. B74, 144426 (2006)

    2006

  43. [54]

    Sinha, F

    M. Sinha, F. Yan, L. Grans-Samuelsson, A. Roy, and H. Saleur, Lattice realizations of topological defects in the critical (1 + 1)-d three-state Potts model, J. High 7 Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 225

    2024

  44. [56]

    Kennedy, Exact diagonalisations of open spin-1 chains, J

    T. Kennedy, Exact diagonalisations of open spin-1 chains, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter2, 5737 (1990)

    1990

  45. [57]

    L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Zheng, Noninvertible duality transformation between symmetry-protected topological and spontaneous symmetry breaking phases, Phys. Rev. B108, 214429 (2023)

    2023

  46. [58]

    Okunishi, Topological disentangler for the valence- bond-solid chain, Phys

    K. Okunishi, Topological disentangler for the valence- bond-solid chain, Phys. Rev. B83, 104411 (2011)

    2011

  47. [59]

    Parayil Mana, Y

    A. Parayil Mana, Y. Li, H. Sukeno, and T.-C. Wei, Kennedy-Tasaki transformation and noninvertible sym- metry in lattice models beyond one dimension, Phys. Rev. B109, 245129 (2024)

    2024

  48. [60]

    Disentangling Haldane Phase by Generalized Clifford Circuits

    L. Lootens, C. Delcamp, and F. Verstraete, Entangle- ment and the density matrix renormalization group in the generalized Landau paradigm, Nat. Phys.21, 1657 (2025). END MA TTER Detailed form of AKLT MPSHere, we provide the MPS description of the AKLT state and the KW- transfo...

    2025

  49. [61]

    As a result of Lemma 2, the KW transformation result ofS j ·S j+1 is still local since [S j ·S j+1, ZjZj+1] = 0

    Conversely, if (Z jZj+1)Oj,j+1(ZjZj+1)† =O j,j+1, the condition holds: This follows because such conjugation multiplies each coefficient byω aj+aj+1, forcing all coefficients withω aj+aj+1 ̸= 1 to vanish. As a result of Lemma 2, the KW transformation result ofS j ·S j+1 is sti...

  50. [62]

    After the KT transformation, the Heisenberg and BLBQ models exhibit aZ 2 ×Z 2 symmetry generated by{X,Z}, whereZ= QN j=1 eiπS z j

    (S132) This resulting operator is not a Pauli string. After the KT transformation, the Heisenberg and BLBQ models exhibit aZ 2 ×Z 2 symmetry generated by{X,Z}, whereZ= QN j=1 eiπS z j . This follows from the fact that bothXandZcommute withU KT. In contrast to the KW-transforme...

  51. [63]

    Gottesman, Fault-tolerant quantum computation with higher-dimensional systems, Chaos Solitons Fractals10, 1749 (1999)

    D. Gottesman, Fault-tolerant quantum computation with higher-dimensional systems, Chaos Solitons Fractals10, 1749 (1999)

    1999

  52. [64]

    Hostens, J

    E. Hostens, J. Dehaene, and B. De Moor, Stabilizer states and Clifford operations for systems of arbitrary dimensions and modular arithmetic, Phys. Rev. A71, 042315 (2005)

    2005

  53. [65]

    Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Qudits and high-dimensional quantum computing, Front. Phys.8, 589504 (2020)

    2020

  54. [66]

    Harper, A

    B. Harper, A. C. Nakhl, T. Quella, M. Sevior, and M. Usman, GCAMPS: A scalable classical simulator for qudit systems, inProceedings of the Supercomputing Asia and International Conference on High Performance Computing in Asia Pacific Region(Association for Computing Machinery,...

    2026

  55. [67]

    Sinha, F

    M. Sinha, F. Yan, L. Grans-Samuelsson, A. Roy, and H. Saleur, Lattice realizations of topological defects in the critical (1 + 1)-d three-state Potts model, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 225

    2024

  56. [68]

    Zhang and G

    H.-C. Zhang and G. Sierra, Kramers-Wannier self-duality and non-invertible translation symmetry in quantum chains: A wave-function perspective, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 157

    2025

  57. [69]

    C. Fan, X. Qian, H.-C. Zhang, R.-Z. Huang, M. Qin, and T. Xiang, Disentangling critical quantum spin chains with Clifford circuits, Phys. Rev. B111, 085121 (2025)

    2025

  58. [70]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov and V. A. Fateev, Nonlocal (parafermion) currents in two-dimensional conformal quantum field theory and self-dual critical points inZ N-symmetric statistical systems, Sov. Phys. JETP62, 215 (1985)

    1985

  59. [71]

    V. S. Dotsenko, Critical behavior and associated conformal algebra of theZ 3 potts model, J. Stat. Phys.34, 781 (1984)

    1984

  60. [72]

    V. S. Dotsenko and V. A. Fateev, Conformal algebra and multipoint correlation functions in 2D statistical models, Nucl. Phys. B240, 312 (1984)

    1984

  61. [73]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Rigorous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 799 (1987)

    1987

  62. [74]

    Tasaki,Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Many-Body Systems(Springer, New York, 2020)

    H. Tasaki,Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Many-Body Systems(Springer, New York, 2020)

    2020

  63. [75]

    P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, M

    D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, M. M. Wolf, M. Sanz, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, String order and symmetries in quantum spin lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 167202 (2008)

    2008

  64. [76]

    Pollmann, A

    F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa, Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B81, 064439 (2010)

    2010

  65. [77]

    Pollmann and A

    F. Pollmann and A. M. Turner, Detection of symmetry-protected topological phases in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B86, 125441 (2012)

    2012

  66. [78]

    Pollmann, inTopological Aspects of Condensed Matter Physics: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School 2014, Vol

    F. Pollmann, inTopological Aspects of Condensed Matter Physics: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School 2014, Vol. 103 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017)

    2014

  67. [79]

    Kennedy and H

    T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, Hidden symmetry breaking and the Haldane phase inS= 1 quantum spin chains, Commun. Math. Phys.147, 431 (1992)

    1992

  68. [80]

    Kennedy and H

    T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, HiddenZ 2 ×Z 2 symmetry breaking in Haldane-gap antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B45, 304 (1992)

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.