Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 70 references

A spherical expanding fireball with five parameters reproduces light-hadron pT spectra at RHIC BES energies and yields Gaussian rapidity distributions.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 21:03 UTC pith:J7QXXXTA

load-bearing objection Clean, low-parameter spherical blast-wave fit to STAR BES spectra that delivers usable freeze-out tables, with the expected limitations of the geometry assumption and unrestricted χ². the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.04191 v1 pith:J7QXXXTA submitted 2026-07-05 nucl-th

An expanding spherical fireball model for light hadron production at RHIC (sqrt{s_(rm NN)}=7.7--39 GeV)

Ashutosh Dwibedi , Anupam Panja , Sabyasachi Ghosh This is my paper
classification nucl-th PACS 25.75.-q25.75.Ld24.10.Nz
keywords spherical fireballblast-waveCooper-Fryekinetic freeze-outRHIC Beam Energy ScanpT spectrarapidity distributionsradial flow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that Au+Au collisions from 7.7 to 39 GeV can be described by a spherically expanding fireball whose radius grows according to a simple two-parameter law, with a blast-wave-like radial velocity profile fixed by that growth. Particle spectra are obtained from the Cooper–Frye formula on an instantaneous freeze-out surface. Kinetic freeze-out temperature, expansion parameters and freeze-out time are fixed once and for all by the mid-rapidity pion spectra; every other light hadron then requires only its own chemical potential. The resulting pT spectra match STAR data across centralities, while the same parameters automatically produce approximately Gaussian rapidity distributions. The practical payoff is a compact, hydrodynamics-inspired description that needs far fewer free parameters than full anisotropic blast-wave models yet still captures the bulk observables that do not depend on azimuthal anisotropies.

Core claim

An expanding spherical fireball whose surface velocity is identified with the time derivative of its radius, combined with a linear interior flow profile and Cooper–Frye freeze-out, simultaneously describes the measured mid-rapidity pT spectra of π±, K±, p and p-bar at RHIC Beam Energy Scan energies and predicts Gaussian-like rapidity distributions, using only five parameters fixed primarily by the pion spectra.

What carries the argument

The radius law rB(t)=r0+v∞[t-(1-e-At)/A] that sets both the surface velocity and the blast-wave-like radial rapidity profile vr=(r/rB)ṛB, inserted into the Cooper–Frye integral over a constant-time spherical freeze-out surface.

Load-bearing premise

Azimuthally integrated spectra and rapidity distributions stay essentially unchanged when the real initial elliptic geometry and anisotropic flow are replaced by an effective spherical fireball.

What would settle it

Measure the full rapidity distributions of identified light hadrons at the same BES energies and centralities; if they deviate systematically from the predicted Gaussians, or if the same five parameters fail to describe the pT spectra once resonance feed-down is removed, the model is ruled out.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Kinetic freeze-out temperature falls and lifetime rises from peripheral to central collisions, giving a quantitative map of cooling and expansion.
  • Radial flow develops faster in more central events, consistent with stronger pressure gradients.
  • Effective chemical potentials absorb missing resonance feed-down and can be read off species by species.
  • The same parameter set can be reused for electromagnetic or heavy-flavor probes that need an analytic medium evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the model already works with only azimuthally integrated data, it supplies a cheap baseline against which the necessity of elliptic or viscous corrections can be judged.
  • The two fitting windows (full versus STAR-restricted pT ranges) give a direct handle on how much the extracted freeze-out parameters are contaminated by hard or resonance contributions.
  • The same radius law can be exported to lower-energy fixed-target experiments where full hydrodynamics is still expensive.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript models the medium in Au+Au collisions at RHIC BES energies (√sNN = 7.7–39 GeV) as an expanding spherical fireball whose radius evolves as rB(t) = r0 + v∞[t − (1 − e−At)/A], with a linear radial flow profile vr = (r/rB)ṙB. Particle spectra for π±, K±, p and p̄ are obtained via the Cooper–Frye formula on an instantaneous freeze-out hypersurface. Common kinetic freeze-out parameters (Tkin, A, v∞, tf) are fixed from mid-rapidity pion pT spectra; only a species-dependent µkin is then adjusted for the remaining hadrons. The model is shown to describe STAR pT spectra across six centralities and is used to predict approximately Gaussian rapidity distributions.

Significance. If the description holds, the work supplies a compact, five-parameter alternative to more elaborate blast-wave or hydrodynamic parametrizations for azimuthally integrated spectra and rapidity distributions in the BES regime. The self-consistent link between surface velocity and radius evolution, the systematic centrality trends of the extracted parameters, and the explicit comparison of two fitting windows (full-range versus STAR-like restricted intervals) are useful for phenomenological surveys and as a baseline for more differential studies. The reduction relative to the eight-parameter elliptic fire-cylinder of Ref. [59] is a concrete practical advantage when only integrated observables are required.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II, Eqs. (1)–(8), Table I] Sec. II (paragraph following Eq. (5) and Eqs. (1)–(8)): The central claim of five-parameter economy rests on the assertion that azimuthally integrated pT spectra and rapidity distributions are largely insensitive to the initial elliptic geometry. This is least secure for the 40–80 % bins, where a0/b0 is large and Set-1 χ²/NDF reaches 4–7.3 (Table I). A quantitative estimate of residual anisotropy effects, or a direct side-by-side comparison with the elliptic model of Ref. [59] for at least one mid-central and one peripheral bin, is needed to substantiate that the spherical reduction does not degrade the description or bias the common flow parameters.
  2. [Sec. III, Figs. 5–7] Sec. III and Figs. 5–7: The rapidity distributions are presented as model predictions, yet only the mid-rapidity STAR points are shown. Because dN/dy|y=0 is simply the pT integral of the already-fitted spectrum, agreement at that single point is largely by construction once the pT description is acceptable. The Gaussian shape itself therefore remains untested; either a comparison to existing full-rapidity data (SPS/GSI or RHIC) or a clear statement that no such data exist for these energies/centralities is required to support the predictive claim.
  3. [Table I, Sec. III] Table I and the accompanying discussion of fitting ranges: The main rapidity results are generated with Parameter Set-1 (full pT range), whose χ²/NDF values are systematically higher than both Set-2 and the STAR blast-wave fits. While the text attributes the excess to resonance and hard-process contributions, it is not demonstrated that the extracted (A, v∞, tf) remain stable enough under this contamination to justify their use for the unmeasured rapidity shapes. A short robustness check (e.g., propagating Set-2 parameters into the rapidity distributions) would clarify which set underpins the central claims.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1, Sec. II] Fig. 1 caption and the paragraph defining angles: the dual conventions for ϕ (position space in the reaction plane versus momentum-space ϕp in the XY plane) are easy to misread; a single clarifying sentence or a small inset would help.
  2. [Table II] Table II: several µ entries for peripheral bins at low energy appear with large magnitude and opposite sign for particles and antiparticles; a brief remark on whether these remain within the expected range of effective chemical potentials (after feed-down absorption) would be useful.
  3. Throughout: the notation switches between Tkin/µkin and T/µ; consistent subscripts would improve readability.
  4. [Introduction] References: the recent spherical/spheroidal works [29–32] are cited, but a one-sentence contrast with the present radial-velocity prescription would better locate the novelty.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Pion pT fits fix common flow parameters that are then reused (plus free µkin) for other species and for rapidity distributions whose mid-rapidity points match data by construction of the integral.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract; Sec. III (paragraphs on parameter extraction and rapidity distributions); Eq. (10) and surrounding text]
    "The model parameters are fixed from the midrapidity pT spectra of pions at kinetic freeze-out for different centralities. The same parameters are then used for the other hadron species, with the kinetic freeze-out chemical potential as the only additional free parameter. The model provides a good description of the STAR collaboration data for the pT spectra of light hadrons and predicts Gaussian-like rapidity distributions"

    Common flow parameters are fitted solely to pion pT spectra (with explicit low-pT weighting “to ensure a reliable description of the experimentally measured mid-rapidity yields”). The rapidity distributions are then obtained by integrating those same fitted spectra via Eq. (10); the mid-rapidity points that match STAR data are therefore forced by construction of the integral, not independent predictions. Other-species spectra are likewise fits with one free µkin each.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sec. III, discussion of mid-rapidity yields and Figs. 5–7]
    "Greater weight was assigned to the low-pT region during the fitting procedure to ensure a reliable description of the experimentally measured mid-rapidity yields. … It is obvious from the expression, dN/dyp|yp=0=∫(d2N/2πpT dpT dyp)yp=0 2πpT dpT that the calculated mid-rapidity yield, obtained by integrating the fitted pT spectrum, agrees well with the experimental data, only if the integrand agrees with the experimental data."

    The authors themselves note that mid-rapidity yields are integrals of the fitted pT spectra. Presenting the full rapidity curves (whose only data comparison is the forced mid-rapidity point) as model “predictions” therefore re-labels a fit output as an independent result.

full rationale

The paper is a standard phenomenological blast-wave-style fit, not a first-principles derivation. Common parameters (A, v∞, tf, Tkin) are extracted exclusively from pion mid-rapidity pT spectra (with low-pT weighting chosen to reproduce yields). Those parameters plus one free µkin per species then describe the remaining pT spectra; the rapidity distributions are obtained by pT-integrating the same fitted spectra, so the mid-rapidity data points shown in Figs. 5–7 necessarily agree once the pT fits succeed. The Gaussian shapes away from mid-rapidity and the simultaneous multi-species description with only five parameters retain independent content, and the spherical-geometry assumption is an explicit modeling choice rather than a circular reduction. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem or self-citation chain forces the result. The circularity is therefore partial and of the “fitted-input-called-prediction” type, scoring 5 rather than higher.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a standard Cooper–Frye freeze-out plus a handful of free parameters that are fitted to pion spectra and then reused. The spherical geometry and the particular functional form of rB(t) are modeling choices without independent experimental handles beyond the spectra themselves. No new particles or forces are invented.

free parameters (5)
  • T_kin (kinetic freeze-out temperature) = 117–144 MeV (Tables I)
    Fitted independently for each energy and centrality from pion pT spectra; values range 117–144 MeV across the two sets.
  • v_∞ (asymptotic surface velocity) = 0.24–0.65 (Tables I)
    Fitted from pion spectra; controls the final radial flow strength.
  • A (radial-flow development rate) = 0.20–0.90 fm⁻¹ (Tables I)
    Fitted from pion spectra; sets how quickly the surface velocity approaches v_∞.
  • t_f (freeze-out time) = 5–19 fm (Tables I)
    Fitted from pion spectra; determines the hypersurface volume.
  • µ_kin (species-dependent chemical potential) = values in Table II (MeV)
    Only free parameter left after pion fit; adjusted separately for p, p̄, K⁺, K⁻ to match yields; absorbs missing resonance feed-down.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Local thermal equilibrium distribution on an instantaneous lab-time freeze-out hypersurface (Cooper–Frye with Bose/Fermi statistics).
    Standard in blast-wave phenomenology; invoked in Eq. (9)–(10).
  • ad hoc to paper Spherical symmetry of the fireball and linear radial velocity profile vr = (r/rB)ṙB are sufficient for azimuthally integrated spectra.
    Explicitly adopted in Sec. II despite known elliptic geometry of non-central collisions; justified by the claim that integrated spectra are insensitive to anisotropy.
  • ad hoc to paper Radius evolution rB(t) = r0 + v∞ [t - (1-e^{-At})/A] with r0 fixed by geometric overlap.
    Specific functional form chosen in Eq. (1); not derived from hydro equations of motion.
  • domain assumption Resonance feed-down can be absorbed into effective kinetic chemical potentials without explicit calculation.
    Stated in Sec. III; follows common practice in default blast-wave analyses.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 24836 in / 3053 out tokens · 28792 ms · 2026-07-11T21:03:05.975038+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the transverse momentum ($p_T$) spectra and rapidity distributions of the light hadrons $\pi^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$, $p$, and $\bar{p}$ produced in Au+Au collisions at RHIC for $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 7.7$--39 GeV and different collision centralities. The produced medium is modeled as an expanding spherical fireball, with the radial expansion velocity determined from the rate of increase of the fireball radius. The particle spectra are calculated using the Cooper--Frye freeze-out prescription with a local equilibrium distribution function and a blast-wave-like flow profile. The model parameters are fixed from the midrapidity $p_T$ spectra of pions at kinetic freeze-out for different centralities. The same parameters are then used for the other hadron species, with the kinetic freeze-out chemical potential as the only additional free parameter. The model provides a good description of the STAR collaboration data for the $p_{T}$ spectra of light hadrons and predicts Gaussian-like rapidity distributions over the considered energy range across different centralities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.04191 by Anupam Panja, Ashutosh Dwibedi, Sabyasachi Ghosh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Geometry of the expanding spherical fireball used in the present work. The freeze-out occurs on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (Color online) Calculated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (Color online) Calculated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (Color online) Calculated transverse momentum ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (Color online) Calculated rapidity distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (Color online) Calculated rapidity distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (Color online) Calculated rapidity distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Roland, K

    G. Roland, K. Safarik, and P. Steinberg. Heavy-ion col- lisions at the LHC.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 77:70–127, 2014.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2014.05.001

    doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2014.05.001 2014

  2. [2]

    An overview of experimental results from ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions at the CERN LHC: Bulk proper- ties and dynamical evolution.Rev

    Panagiota Foka and Ma lgorzata Anna Janik. An overview of experimental results from ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions at the CERN LHC: Bulk proper- ties and dynamical evolution.Rev. Phys., 1:154–171, 2016.arXiv:1702.07233,doi:10.1016/j.revip.2016. 11.002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.revip.2016 2016

  3. [3]

    Adamczyk et al

    L. Adamczyk et al. Bulk Properties of the Medium Pro- duced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program.Phys. Rev. C, 96(4):044904, 2017. arXiv:1701.07065,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044904

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.044904 2017

  4. [4]

    Properties of the QCD matter: re- view of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collider beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program.Nucl

    Jinhui Chen et al. Properties of the QCD matter: re- view of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collider beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program.Nucl. Sci. Tech., 35(12):214, 2024.arXiv:2407.02935,doi: 10.1007/s41365-024-01591-2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01591-2 2024

  5. [5]

    Why does the quark gluon plasma at RHIC behave as a nearly ideal fluid?Prog

    Edward Shuryak. Why does the quark gluon plasma at RHIC behave as a nearly ideal fluid?Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 53:273–303, 2004.arXiv:hep-ph/0312227,doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2004.02.025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2004.02.025 2004

  6. [6]

    Viscosity Information from Relativistic Nuclear Collisions: How Perfect is the Fluid Observed at RHIC?Phys

    Paul Romatschke and Ulrike Romatschke. Viscosity Information from Relativistic Nuclear Collisions: How Perfect is the Fluid Observed at RHIC?Phys. Rev. Lett., 99:172301, 2007.arXiv:0706.1522,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.99.172301

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  7. [7]

    Kolb and Ulrich W

    Peter F. Kolb and Ulrich W. Heinz. Hydrodynamic de- scription of ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. pages 634–714, 5 2003.arXiv:nucl-th/0305084

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.Ann

    Ulrich Heinz and Raimond Snellings. Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 63:123–151, 2013.arXiv:1301.2826, doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102212-170540

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102212-170540 2013

  9. [9]

    Hy- drodynamic Modeling of Heavy-Ion Collisions.Int

    Charles Gale, Sangyong Jeon, and Bjoern Schenke. Hy- drodynamic Modeling of Heavy-Ion Collisions.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 28:1340011, 2013.arXiv:1301.5893, doi:10.1142/S0217751X13400113

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217751x13400113 2013

  10. [10]

    Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics

    Paul Romatschke and Ulrike Romatschke.Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 5 2019.arXiv:1712.05815,doi:10.1017/ 9781108651998

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    A. De, J. I. Kapusta, M. Singh, and T. Welle. Com- prehensive simulation of heavy-ion collisions at nonzero baryon chemical potential.Phys. Rev. C, 106(5):054906, 2022.arXiv:2206.02655,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106. 054906

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.106 2022

  12. [12]

    Mahammad Sabir Ali, Deeptak Biswas, Amaresh Jaiswal, and Sushant K. Singh. Hadron momentum spec- tra from analytical solutions of relativistic hydrodynam- ics.Eur. Phys. J. C, 85(1):30, 2025.arXiv:2403.00624, 13 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13751-8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13751-8 2025

  13. [13]

    Chiho Nonaka and Masayuki Asakawa. Mod- eling a realistic dynamical model for high en- ergy heavy ion collisions.Progress of Theoreti- cal and Experimental Physics, 2012(1):01A208, 09 2012.arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/ptep/ article-pdf/2012/1/01A208/4456796/pts014.pdf, doi:10.1093/ptep/pts014

    doi:10.1093/ptep/pts014 2012

  14. [14]

    Siemens and John O

    Philip J. Siemens and John O. Rasmussen. Evidence for a blast wave from compressed nuclear matter.Phys. Rev. Lett., 42:880–883, Apr 1979. URL:https:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.880,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.880

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.42.880 1979

  15. [16]

    Ex- planation of the RHIC p(T) spectra in a ther- mal model with expansion.Phys

    Wojciech Broniowski and Wojciech Florkowski. Ex- planation of the RHIC p(T) spectra in a ther- mal model with expansion.Phys. Rev. Lett., 87:272302, 2001.arXiv:nucl-th/0106050,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.87.272302

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  16. [17]

    Strange particle production at RHIC in a single freezeout model

    Wojciech Broniowski and Wojciech Florkowski. Strange particle production at RHIC in a single freezeout model. Phys. Rev. C, 65:064905, 2002.arXiv:nucl-th/0112043, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.65.064905

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.65.064905 2002

  17. [18]

    Huovinen, P

    P. Huovinen, P. F. Kolb, Ulrich W. Heinz, P. V. Ruuska- nen, and S. A. Voloshin. Radial and elliptic flow at RHIC: Further predictions.Phys. Lett. B, 503:58–64, 2001. arXiv:hep-ph/0101136,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01) 00219-2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(01 2001

  18. [19]

    Hydro- inspired parameterizations of freeze-out in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.Acta Phys

    Wojciech Florkowski and Wojciech Broniowski. Hydro- inspired parameterizations of freeze-out in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.Acta Phys. Polon. B, 35:2895–2910, 2004.arXiv:nucl-th/0410081

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  19. [20]

    Adler et al

    C. Adler et al. Identified particle elliptic flow in Au + Au collisions at √sNN = 130-GeV.Phys. Rev. Lett., 87:182301, 2001.arXiv:nucl-ex/0107003,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.182301

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.182301 2001

  20. [22]

    Spectra and radial flow at RHIC with Tsallis statistics in a Blast-Wave descrip- tion.Phys

    Zebo Tang, Yichun Xu, Lijuan Ruan, Gene van Buren, Fuqiang Wang, and Zhangbu Xu. Spectra and radial flow at RHIC with Tsallis statistics in a Blast-Wave descrip- tion.Phys. Rev. C, 79:051901, 2009.arXiv:0812.1609, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.051901

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.051901 2009

  21. [23]

    Fries, and Ralf Rapp

    Min He, Rainer J. Fries, and Ralf Rapp. Scaling of Elliptic Flow, Recombination and Sequential Freeze- Out of Hadrons in Heavy-Ion Collisions.Phys. Rev. C, 82:034907, 2010.arXiv:1006.1111,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.82.034907

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  22. [24]

    X. Sun, H. Masui, A. M. Poskanzer, and A. Schmah. Blast Wave Fits to Elliptic Flow Data at √sNN = 7.7– 2760 GeV.Phys. Rev. C, 91(2):024903, 2015.arXiv: 1410.1947,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.024903

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.024903 2015

  23. [25]

    Reconstructing the fi- nal state of Pb+Pb collisions at √sN N = 2.76 TeV.J

    Ivan Melo and Boris Tomasik. Reconstructing the fi- nal state of Pb+Pb collisions at √sN N = 2.76 TeV.J. Phys. G, 43(1):015102, 2016.arXiv:1502.01247,doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/43/1/015102

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/1/015102 2016

  24. [26]

    On elliptic flow and the blast-wave model

    Boris Tomasik. On elliptic flow and the blast-wave model. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 40(21):2542006, 2025.arXiv:2409. 19758,doi:10.1142/S0217751X25420060

    doi:10.1142/s0217751x25420060 2025

  25. [27]

    Higher-order anisotropies in the Blast- Wave Model - disentangling flow and density field anisotropies.Eur

    Jakub Cimerman, Boris Tomasik, Mate Csanad, and Sandor Lokos. Higher-order anisotropies in the Blast- Wave Model - disentangling flow and density field anisotropies.Eur. Phys. J. A, 53(8):161, 2017.arXiv: 1702.01735,doi:10.1140/epja/i2017-12349-7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2017-12349-7 2017

  26. [28]

    Kinetic freeze-out in central heavy-ion collisions between 7.7 and 2760 GeV per nucleon pair

    Ivan Melo and Boris Tom´ aˇ sik. Kinetic freeze-out in cen- tral heavy-ion collisions between 7.7 and 2760 GeV per nucleon pair.J. Phys. G, 47(4):045107, 2020.arXiv: 1908.03023,doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab5f03

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab5f03 2020

  27. [29]

    Sta- tistical hadronization model for low-energy heavy-ion collisions.Journal of Subatomic Particles and Cosmology, 4:100249, 2025

    Wojciech Florkowski and Radoslaw Ryblewski. Sta- tistical hadronization model for low-energy heavy-ion collisions.Journal of Subatomic Particles and Cosmology, 4:100249, 2025. URL:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S3050480525002298, doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2025.100249

    doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2025.100249 2025

  28. [30]

    Statistical hadronization model for heavy-ion collisions in a few GeV energy regime

    Szymon Harabasz, Wojciech Florkowski, Tetyana Galatyuk,‡. Ma Lgorzata Gumberidze, Radoslaw Ry- blewski, Piotr Salabura, and Joachim Stroth. Statisti- cal hadronization model for heavy-ion collisions in the few-GeV energy regime.Phys. Rev. C, 102(5):054903, 2020.arXiv:2003.12992,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102. 054903

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.102 2020

  29. [31]

    Spheroidal expansion and freeze-out geometry of heavy-ion collisions in the few-GeV energy regime

    Szymon Harabasz, Jedrzej Ko la´ s, Rados law Ryblewski, Wojciech Florkowski, Tetyana Galatyuk, Ma lgorzata Gumberidze, Piotr Salabura, Joachim Stroth, and Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk. Spheroidal expansion and freeze-out geometry of heavy-ion collisions in the few- GeV energy regime.Phys. Rev. C, 107(3):034917, 2023.arXiv:2210.07694,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107. 034917

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.107 2023

  30. [32]

    3H and 3He nu- clei production in a combined thermal and coalescence framework for heavy-ion collisions in the few-GeV en- ergy regime*.Chin

    Zbigniew Drogosz, Wojciech Florkowski, Nikodem Witkowski, and Radoslaw Ryblewski. 3H and 3He nu- clei production in a combined thermal and coalescence framework for heavy-ion collisions in the few-GeV en- ergy regime*.Chin. Phys., 50(1):014104, 2026.arXiv: 2504.00283,doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ae099a

    doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ae099a 2026

  31. [34]

    A viscous blast-wave model for relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    Amaresh Jaiswal and Volker Koch. A viscous blast-wave model for relativistic heavy-ion collisions. 8 2015.arXiv: 1508.05878

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [35]

    Yang and Rainer J

    Z. Yang and Rainer J. Fries. A Blast Wave Model With Viscous Corrections.J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 832(1):012056, 2017.arXiv:1612.05629,doi:10.1088/1742-6596/832/ 1/012056

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1742-6596/832/ 2017

  33. [37]

    Zhidong Yang and Rainer J. Fries. Parameterizing smooth viscous fluid dynamics with a viscous blast wave. J. Phys. G, 51(1):015102, 2024.arXiv:2007.11777, doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ad0914

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ad0914 2024

  34. [38]

    Bayesian Inference of the Specific Shear and Bulk Viscosities of the Quark-Gluon Plasma at Crossover from $\phi$ and $\Omega$ Observables

    Zhidong Yang and Lie-Wen Chen. Bayesian inference of the specific shear and bulk viscosities of the quark-gluon plasma at crossover fromϕand Ω observables.Phys. Rev. C, 107(6):064910, 2023.arXiv:2207.13534,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.064910. 14

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.064910 2023

  35. [39]

    Baryon density dependence of viscosities of the quark-gluon plasma at hadronization

    Zhidong Yang, Yifeng Sun, and Lie-Wen Chen. Baryon- density dependence of viscosities of the quark-gluon plasma at hadronization.Phys. Rev. C, 109(5):054907, 2024.arXiv:2310.17444,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109. 054907

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.109 2024

  36. [40]

    Kinetic freeze out conditions in nuclear collisions with $2A$ - $158A$ GeV beam energy within a non-boost-invariant blast-wave model

    Sudhir Pandurang Rode, Partha Pratim Bhaduri, Amaresh Jaiswal, and Ankhi Roy. Kinetic freeze-out con- ditions in nuclear collisions with 2A- 158AGeV beam energy within a non-boost-invariant blast-wave model. Phys. Rev. C, 98(2):024907, 2018.arXiv:1805.11463, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.024907

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.98.024907 2018

  37. [41]

    Hierarchy of kinetic freeze-out parameters in low energy heavy-ion collisions

    Sudhir Pandurang Rode, Partha Pratim Bhaduri, Amaresh Jaiswal, and Ankhi Roy. Hierarchy of kinetic freeze-out parameters in low energy heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 102(5):054912, 2020.arXiv:2004.04703, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.054912

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.054912 2020

  38. [42]

    Freezeout hypersurface at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider from particle spec- tra: Flavor and centrality dependence.Phys

    Sandeep Chatterjee, Bedangadas Mohanty, and Ranbir Singh. Freezeout hypersurface at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider from particle spec- tra: Flavor and centrality dependence.Phys. Rev. C, 92(2):024917, 2015.arXiv:1411.1718,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.92.024917

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [43]

    Event topology and global observables in heavy-ion collisions at the Large Hadron Collider

    Suraj Prasad, Neelkamal Mallick, Debadatta Behera, Raghunath Sahoo, and Sushanta Tripathy. Event topol- ogy and global observables in heavy-ion collisions at the Large Hadron Collider.Sci. Rep., 12(1):3917, 2022. arXiv:2112.03892,doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07547-z

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07547-z 2022

  40. [44]

    Dominance of electric fields in the charge splitting of elliptic flow.J

    Ankit Kumar Panda. Dominance of electric fields in the charge splitting of elliptic flow.J. Phys. G, 52(5):055102, 2025.arXiv:2501.07240,doi:10.1088/ 1361-6471/adce1b

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [45]

    A. S. Parvan, A. A. Aparin, and E. V. Nedorezov. Fi- nite Volume Effects on Transverse Momentum Spectra at LHC and RHIC Using a Blast-Wave Model with Planck Transformed Temperatures. 4 2026.arXiv:2604.07410

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [46]

    Kinetic Freeze-Out Con- ditions and Net Baryon Density in Au+Au Collisions at√sN N = 7.7–39 GeV within a Collective Flow Fireball Model

    Sk Noor Alam and Victor Roy. Kinetic Freeze-Out Con- ditions and Net Baryon Density in Au+Au Collisions at√sN N = 7.7–39 GeV within a Collective Flow Fireball Model. 3 2026.arXiv:2603.07160

    arXiv 2026

  43. [47]

    Low mass dileptons at the CERN SPS: Evidence for chiral restoration?Eur

    Ralf Rapp and Jochen Wambach. Low mass dileptons at the CERN SPS: Evidence for chiral restoration?Eur. Phys. J. A, 6:415–420, 1999.arXiv:hep-ph/9907502, doi:10.1007/s100500050364

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s100500050364 1999

  44. [48]

    Ralf Rapp and Edward V. Shuryak. Thermal dilepton radiation at intermediate masses at the CERN - SPS. Phys. Lett. B, 473:13–19, 2000.arXiv:hep-ph/9909348, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01367-2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)01367-2 2000

  45. [49]

    R. Rapp. Signatures of thermal dilepton radiation at RHIC.Phys. Rev. C, 63:054907, 2001.arXiv:hep-ph/ 0010101,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.054907

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.63.054907 2001

  46. [51]

    Heavy-quark probes of the quark-gluon plasma and in- terpretation of recent data taken at the BNL Rela- tivistic Heavy Ion Collider.Phys

    Hendrik van Hees, Vincenzo Greco, and Ralf Rapp. Heavy-quark probes of the quark-gluon plasma and in- terpretation of recent data taken at the BNL Rela- tivistic Heavy Ion Collider.Phys. Rev. C, 73:034913, 2006.arXiv:nucl-th/0508055,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC. 73.034913

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc 2006

  47. [52]

    Comprehensive in- terpretation of thermal dileptons at the SPS.Phys

    Hendrik van Hees and Ralf Rapp. Comprehensive in- terpretation of thermal dileptons at the SPS.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97:102301, 2006.arXiv:hep-ph/0603084, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.102301

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.102301 2006

  48. [54]

    Thermal Photons and Collective Flow at the Relativistic Heavy- Ion Collider.Phys

    Hendrik van Hees, Charles Gale, and Ralf Rapp. Thermal Photons and Collective Flow at the Relativistic Heavy- Ion Collider.Phys. Rev. C, 84:054906, 2011.arXiv: 1108.2131,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.84.054906

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.84.054906 2011

  49. [55]

    The Influence of bulk evolution models on heavy-quark phenomenology

    Pol Bernard Gossiaux, Sascha Vogel, Hendrik van Hees, Joerg Aichelin, Ralf Rapp, Min He, and Marcus Bluhm. The Influence of bulk evolution models on heavy-quark phenomenology. 2 2011.arXiv:1102.1114

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  50. [56]

    Pseudo- critical enhancement of thermal photons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions?Nucl

    Hendrik van Hees, Min He, and Ralf Rapp. Pseudo- critical enhancement of thermal photons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions?Nucl. Phys. A, 933:256–271, 2015. arXiv:1404.2846,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.09. 009

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.09 2015

  51. [58]

    J. P. Bondorf, S. I. A. Garpman, and J. Zimanyi. A Sim- ple Analytic Hydrodynamic Model for Expanding Fire- balls.Nucl. Phys. A, 296:320–332, 1978.doi:10.1016/ 0375-9474(78)90076-3

    1978

  52. [59]

    Spectra and elliptic flow of light hadrons in an expanding fire-cylinder model for the RHIC Beam Energy Scan

    Anand Rai, Ashutosh Dwibedi, and Sabyasachi Ghosh. Spectra and elliptic flow of light hadrons in an expand- ing fire-cylinder model for the RHIC Beam Energy Scan. Nucl. Phys. A, 1073:123440, 2026.arXiv:2602.17241, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2026.123440

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2026.123440 2026

  53. [60]

    Comment on the Single Particle Distribution in the Hydrodynamic and Statisti- cal Thermodynamic Models of Multiparticle Production

    Fred Cooper and Graham Frye. Comment on the Single Particle Distribution in the Hydrodynamic and Statisti- cal Thermodynamic Models of Multiparticle Production. Phys. Rev. D, 10:186, 1974.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10. 186

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.10 1974

  54. [61]

    S. V. Afanasiev et al. Energy dependence of pion and kaon production in central Pb + Pb collisions.Phys. Rev. C, 66:054902, 2002.arXiv:nucl-ex/0205002,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.66.054902

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.66.054902 2002

  55. [62]

    Adamczewski-Musch et al

    J. Adamczewski-Musch et al. Charged-pion production inAu+Aucollisions at √sNN = 2.4GeV: HADES Collaboration.Eur. Phys. J. A, 56(10):259, 2020.arXiv: 2005.08774,doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00237-2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00237-2 2020

  56. [63]

    Rapidity Dependence of Charged Particle Yields for Au+Au at sqrt(sNN) = 200 GeV

    Djamel Ouerdane. Rapidity dependence of charged par- ticle yields for Au+Au at √sNN = 200-GeV.Nucl. Phys. A, 715:478–481, 2003.arXiv:nucl-ex/0212001, doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01454-9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(02)01454-9 2003

  57. [64]

    I. G. Bearden, D. Beavis, C. Besliu, B. Budick, H. Bøggild, C. Chasman, C. H. Christensen, P. Chris- tiansen, J. Cibor, R. Debbe, E. Enger, J. J. Gaardhøje, M. Germinario, K. Hagel, O. Hansen, A. Holm, A. K. Holme, H. Ito, A. Jipa, F. Jundt, J. I. Jørdre, C. E. Jørgensen, R. Karabowicz, E. J. Kim, T. Kozik, T. M. Larsen, J. H. Lee, Y. K. Lee, G. Løvhøiden...

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.102301 2004

  58. [65]

    I. G. Bearden, D. Beavis, C. Besliu, B. Budick, H. Bøggild, C. Chasman, C. H. Christensen, P. Chris- tiansen, J. Cibor, R. Debbe, E. Enger, J. J. Gaardhøje, M. Germinario, K. Hagel, O. Hansen, A. Holm, A. K. Holme, H. Ito, A. Jipa, F. Jundt, J. I. Jørdre, C. E. Jørgensen, R. Karabowicz, E. J. Kim, T. Kozik, T. M. Larsen, J. H. Lee, Y. K. Lee, G. Løvhøiden...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.162301 2005

  59. [66]

    Cleymans and K

    J. Cleymans and K. Redlich. Unified description of freezeout parameters in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:5284–5286, 1998.arXiv:nucl-th/ 9808030,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5284

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5284 1998

  60. [67]

    Cleymans and K

    J. Cleymans and K. Redlich. Chemical and ther- mal freezeout parameters from 1-A/GeV to 200-A/GeV. Phys. Rev. C, 60:054908, 1999.arXiv:nucl-th/9903063, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.60.054908

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.60.054908 1999

  61. [68]

    Becattini, J

    F. Becattini, J. Cleymans, A. Keranen, E Suhonen, and K. Redlich. Features of particle multiplicities and strangeness production in central heavy ion collisions between 1.7A-GeV/c and 158A-GeV/c.Phys. Rev. C, 64:024901, 2001.arXiv:hep-ph/0002267,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.64.024901

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  62. [69]

    Particle production in heavy ion collisions

    Peter Braun-Munzinger, Krzysztof Redlich, and Johanna Stachel. Particle production in heavy ion collisions. pages 491–599, 4 2003.arXiv:nucl-th/0304013,doi: 10.1142/9789812795533_0008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789812795533_0008 2003

  63. [70]

    Cleymans, H

    J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich, and S. Wheaton. Comparison of chemical freeze-out criteria in heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. C, 73:034905, 2006.arXiv:hep-ph/ 0511094,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.034905

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.73.034905 2006

  64. [71]

    Wheaton, J

    S. Wheaton, J. Cleymans, and M. Hauer. Thermus—a thermal model package for root.Computer Physics Communications, 180(1):84–106, January 2009. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2008.08.001,doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2008.08.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.08.001 2009

  65. [72]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, and J. Stachel. Hadron production in central nucleus-nucleus colli- sions at chemical freeze-out.Nucl. Phys. A, 772:167– 199, 2006.arXiv:nucl-th/0511071,doi:10.1016/j. nuclphysa.2006.03.012

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j 2006

  66. [73]

    Decoding the phase struc- ture of QCD via particle production at high energy

    Anton Andronic, Peter Braun-Munzinger, Krzysztof Redlich, and Johanna Stachel. Decoding the phase struc- ture of QCD via particle production at high energy. Nature, 561(7723):321–330, 2018.arXiv:1710.09425, doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0491-6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0491-6 2018

  67. [74]

    Mishra, Bedangadas Mohanty, Raghunath Sahoo, and Natasha Sharma

    Sandeep Chatterjee, Sabita Das, Lokesh Kumar, D. Mishra, Bedangadas Mohanty, Raghunath Sahoo, and Natasha Sharma. Freeze-Out Parameters in Heavy-Ion Collisions at AGS, SPS, RHIC, and LHC Energies.Adv. High Energy Phys., 2015:349013, 2015.doi:10.1155/ 2015/349013

    2015

  68. [75]

    Freezeout systematics due to the hadron spectrum

    Sandeep Chatterjee, Debadeepti Mishra, Bedangadas Mohanty, and Subhasis Samanta. Freezeout systematics due to the hadron spectrum.Phys. Rev. C, 96(5):054907, 2017.arXiv:1708.08152,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96. 054907

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.96 2017

  69. [76]

    J. D. Bjorken. Highly Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Col- lisions: The Central Rapidity Region.Phys. Rev. D, 27:140–151, 1983.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.27.140

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.27.140 1983

  70. [77]

    B. I. Abelev et al. Systematic Measurements of Identified Particle Spectra inpp, d + Au and Au+Au Collisions from STAR.Phys. Rev. C, 79:034909, 2009.arXiv:0808.2041, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.034909

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.034909 2009