Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 85 references

The pyrenoid shows that living catalytic compartments can be captured by a few effective transport, reaction and design parameters.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 07:58 UTC pith:ABEEHKDX

load-bearing objection Solid, carefully caveated biophysics review that organizes the pyrenoid literature around effective low-dimensional descriptions; useful synthesis, modest novelty, no load-bearing flaws. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.05154 v1 pith:ABEEHKDX submitted 2026-07-06 physics.bio-ph

Biophysics of the Pyrenoid

classification physics.bio-ph PACS 87.15.Zg87.16.A-87.16.D-82.40.Ck87.15.R-
keywords pyrenoidbiomolecular condensatesreaction-diffusionsticker-and-spacercarbon-concentrating mechanismphase separationcatalytic compartmentalizationsoft matter biophysics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review argues that the pyrenoid—a liquid-like organelle that concentrates Rubisco and CO2 for photosynthesis—is unusually well suited to quantitative biophysics. Reaction–diffusion models of carbon supply, fixation and leakage can be reduced to a small set of effective fluxes and timescales; sticker-and-spacer and mean-field theories link Rubisco–linker interactions to condensate assembly through a handful of molecular design parameters and thermodynamic constraints. Because the organelle’s physiological output (carbon fixation) is measurable and its molecular parts are known, theory and experiment can be compared directly. The authors therefore present the pyrenoid as a model for how complex living compartments can still admit simple effective physical descriptions, and for testing general principles of catalytic compartmentalization and biomolecular self-organization.

Core claim

Despite molecular and architectural complexity, pyrenoid catalytic function can be described by a balance of a few effective transport and reaction processes, while condensate assembly is governed by a limited set of molecular design parameters (sticker number, interaction strength) and thermodynamic constraints. The organelle therefore offers a tractable system in which catalytic performance and self-organization can both be linked to reduced physical descriptions.

What carries the argument

The reduced constitutive balance of supply, fixation and leakage (dc/dt = R_supply(t) − R_fixation(c) − R_leakage(c)) and its frequency-response form, together with sticker-and-spacer / Flory–Huggins descriptions that coarse-grain multivalent Rubisco–linker binding into effective interaction strength and molecular size.

Load-bearing premise

That the match between the full reaction–diffusion model and the single-timescale toy equation reflects genuine coarse-graining rather than an accidental decoupling produced by the model’s rapid conversion rates.

What would settle it

Measure average carbon-fixation rate under controlled sinusoidal fluctuations of inorganic-carbon supply across a wide frequency range; if the response cannot be fitted by a single relaxation time (or if the low-frequency asymptote equals the steady-state rate at mean supply), the reduced constitutive description fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. This is a biophysics-focused review of the algal/hornwort pyrenoid as a tractable model for catalytic compartmentalization and biomolecular condensate self-organization. The authors argue that pyrenoid carbon-fixation performance can be cast as a balance of a few effective fluxes (supply, fixation, leakage; Eq. 1), that time-dependent reaction–diffusion models of the Fei type may admit a simple frequency-response constitutive form (Eq. 2, Fig. 2), and that condensate assembly is governed by a limited set of molecular design parameters (sticker number, spacer flexibility, effective χ) within sticker-and-spacer and mean-field Flory–Huggins frameworks (Figs. 3–5). They further survey cryo-ET, single-molecule and dilute-phase binding methods that parameterize these descriptions, and close by positioning the pyrenoid as a system in which reduced physical descriptions of living compartments can be tested.

Significance. If the synthesis holds, the paper provides a useful organizing framework for a community that has largely treated CCM physiology, condensate physics and structural cell biology separately. Its main value is not a new primary result but a carefully caveated argument that both catalytic function and assembly admit low-dimensional effective descriptions, with explicit links to primary literature (Fei, Mackinder, He, Payne-Dwyer, Kumar, etc.) and transparent illustrative calculations. Strengths include candid discussion of mean-field failures (dense-phase Rubisco concentration, single-sticker constructs), the authors’ own caveat that the single-timescale reduction of the Fei model may reflect parameter-driven decoupling rather than genuine coarse-graining (§2.3), and summary-point boxes that make the claims falsifiable in spirit. For a physics.bio-ph audience this is a timely and usable review.

major comments (2)
  1. §2.3, Eqs. (1)–(2) and Fig. 2: The abstract and §2 summary points present “a small number of effective transport and reaction processes” and “effective fluxes, parameters and timescales” as a central takeaway, yet the body correctly notes that agreement with the single-τ toy model “likely points at a decoupling of biochemical processes… rather than the emergence of a single effective timescale.” Please rebalance the abstract and summary points so that the coarse-graining claim is stated at the same level of caution as §2.3 (e.g., “may admit” / “illustrative under rapid-conversion assumptions”), and state explicitly which model ingredients (CA rates, passive LCIA, starch barriers) were held fixed when generating Fig. 2. Without that, readers may over-read Fig. 2b as evidence of universal reduction.
  2. §3.3.1, Fig. 5 and the dashed curve in Fig. 4b: The Flory–Huggins construction with χ = −4.5, Nrub = 348 and Nlink = 2S is used both to “reproduce” the sticker-number dependence of the lower binodal and to overlay sticker-spacer predictions. The text does not justify how χ was chosen or whether it is held fixed across S, nor how volume fractions map onto the experimental µM concentrations of Fig. 4. Because this overlay is the main bridge from molecular grammar to thermodynamics in the review, please either (i) document the parameter mapping and any fitting, or (ii) label Fig. 5 / the Fig. 4b dashed line clearly as a qualitative illustration and avoid language of quantitative agreement with the sticker-spacer binodals.
minor comments (8)
  1. Fig. 1 caption: “C. rheinhardtii” → “C. reinhardtii”.
  2. §2.3: typo “inoragnic” → “inorganic”; “specer flexibility” in Fig. 4 caption → “spacer flexibility”.
  3. Throughout: PDF ligatures render as “efficiency”, “affinity”, “sufficiently”, etc.; please normalize for the production version.
  4. §3.2: “binding addinities” → “binding affinities”; “dimerisation occures” → “dimerisation occurs”.
  5. §3.3.2 / Ref. 69: BST4 (RBMP1) is said not to be required for tubule formation; a one-sentence pointer to which alternative scaffold candidates remain open would help non-specialists.
  6. Several references carry 2025–2026 dates (preprints/in press). Please flag status (preprint / accepted) so readers can track versions.
  7. Fig. 2b axis label “Angular Frequency (s−1)” is fine; adding the corresponding period or a vertical mark at the fitted τ would make the toy-model comparison easier to read.
  8. Introduction: “C. rheinhardtii” spelling and the claim that pyrenoids are “unusually amenable to comparison between theory and experiment” would benefit from one sentence contrasting with better-studied condensates (e.g., P granules, nucleoli) so the uniqueness claim is scoped.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review synthesizes external primary results with transparent illustrative calculations, not closed-loop predictions.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [§2.3, Eq. 2 and Fig. 2b]
    "the resulting frequency-dependent average fixation rates (Figure 2b) are well described by the simple constitutive expression in Eq. 2 … The symbols were calculated using the full reaction-diffusion model; the solid curve is the toy model in Eq. 2 fitted to the symbols"

    The single-timescale form (Eq. 2) is fitted to the output of the authors’ own time-dependent extension of the Fei model; the ‘agreement’ is therefore a fit by construction rather than an independent prediction. The authors immediately caveat that the reduction may reflect decoupling from rapid conversion rates rather than genuine coarse-graining, so the step is minor and non-load-bearing for the review’s central claim.

full rationale

This is a review paper whose central claim—that pyrenoid catalytic dynamics and condensate assembly admit low-dimensional effective descriptions—is framed as a suggestion drawn from the primary literature (Fei reaction–diffusion models, Mackinder/He sticker-and-spacer work, Payne-Dwyer/Kumar statistical mechanics) rather than as a new first-principles derivation. The only original quantitative content consists of (i) a time-dependent extension of Fei et al. whose frequency response is fitted by the toy constitutive form Eq. 2 (Fig. 2b) and (ii) Flory–Huggins phase diagrams with an illustrative χ = −4.5 (Fig. 5). Both are presented as illustrations of coarse-graining, not as independent predictions that close a loop on the same data; the authors themselves flag that the single-timescale reduction may reflect parameter-driven decoupling rather than genuine emergence (§2.3). Self-citations to Payne-Dwyer et al. and Kumar et al. (overlapping authors) supply the molecular parameters used in Fig. 4, but those parameters were measured and validated against experiment in the cited primary papers; they are not re-fitted here and then re-predicted. Consequently the derivation chain does not reduce by construction to its inputs, and circularity burden is minimal (score 1).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review the paper inherits the modeling assumptions of the primary literature it surveys. The free parameters and domain assumptions listed below are those required for the illustrative calculations that support the central claim of effective low-dimensional descriptions.

free parameters (4)
  • effective interaction parameter χ = −4.5
    Set to −4.5 in the Flory–Huggins free-energy density to produce the phase diagrams of Fig. 5; not independently measured in this work.
  • Rubisco degree of polymerization Nrub = 348
    Fixed at 348 (number of amino acids) for the mean-field calculation; standard but still a modeling choice.
  • linker size Nlink = 2S = 2S
    Assumed proportional to sticker number S to map engineered constructs onto the Flory–Huggins model.
  • relaxation time τ and coefficients α, β of the toy model
    Fitted to the frequency-response curve generated by the extended Fei model (Fig. 2b); not derived from first principles.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Pyrenoid carbon fixation is adequately described by the balance of three effective rates: supply, fixation and leakage (Eq. 1).
    Introduced in §2.3 as the constitutive equation that any pyrenoid must satisfy; taken from classical CCM literature but elevated to the central reduced description.
  • domain assumption Mean-field Flory–Huggins free energy with a single effective χ captures the essential thermodynamics of Rubisco–linker phase separation.
    Used throughout §3.3.1; the authors themselves note that it fails to keep dense-phase composition constant and incorrectly predicts phase separation for single-sticker linkers.
  • domain assumption Physiologically relevant pyrenoids lie far from the spinodal, so assembly proceeds by nucleation rather than spinodal decomposition.
    Stated in §3.3.2 on the basis of the calculated phase diagrams; underpins the scaffold-assisted nucleation hypothesis.
  • standard math Standard continuum reaction–diffusion equations and equilibrium statistical mechanics apply inside a living chloroplast.
    Background mathematical framework assumed throughout §§2–3.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 25684 in / 2613 out tokens · 24293 ms · 2026-07-11T07:58:04.267707+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Phase-separated liquid droplets organize molecules in cells, but the underlying physical principles differ from abiotic mixing and quantitative rules in living systems remain poorly understood. The pyrenoid -- a liquid-like organelle that enhances photosynthetic carbon fixation in algae and hornworts -- provides an unusually tractable model system. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of pyrenoids from the perspective of biophysics. We highlight how reaction-diffusion models connect compartment architecture to catalytic performance, how soft matter theories link molecular interactions to condensate assembly, and how modern experimental methods enable these predictions to be tested quantitatively. Recent studies suggest that pyrenoid function may be described by a small number of effective transport and reaction processes, while condensate assembly can be understood through molecular design parameters and thermodynamic constraints. Together, these findings establish the pyrenoid as a powerful system for investigating catalytic compartmentalization, biomolecular self-organization and the emergence of effective physical descriptions in living systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05154 by Charley Schaefer, Mark Leake.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: schematic representation of the organelles related to the pyrenoid in the green algae C. rheinhardtii. Right: carbon transport from and to the pyrenoid; the letters indicate: C=cytosol; S=stroma; L=lumen; M=matrix. 2 Biophysics of Catalytic Compartmentalization 2.1 The Pyrenoid as a Catalytic Microreactor The pyrenoid can be viewed as a catalytic microreactor[26] whose performance is determined not o… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Fixation rate in response to oscillations in supply as predicted by a time-dependent extension of the reaction–diffusion model of Fei et al.. (a) Transient fixation rate for fixed ω = 0.1 s−1 and amplitudes increasing from A = 0 to A = 1. For small amplitudes the response is approximately sinusoidal, whereas for larger amplitudes the peaks become increasingly sup￾pressed owing to saturation of uptake and/o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Rubisco protein structure (large and small subunits in dark and light blue, respectively) with bound EPYC1 peptides in orange (This cryo-EM structure was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 7JFO) [20]). (b) Schematic sticker-and-spacer representation of Rubisco:linker system. The sticker-and-spacer framework was first applied to the pyrenoid by Mackinder et al. [19], who proposed that EPYC1 ac… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a. Number of bound linkers per Rubisco monomer in the dilute phase, measured using SPR and Slimfield microscopy [57] for various numbers of stickers per linker. The curves repre￾sent statistical theory fitted to the experiment using the dissociation constant, binding constant Kd and the Kuhn length lk as a measure for the spacer flexibility (reproduced from Ref.23). b. The parameters determined in a were u… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Flory-Huggins phase diagram for the LLPS of Rubisco:linker:water systems with χ = −4.5, Nrub = 348 and Nlink = 2S. In (a) S = 5 represents EPYC1. In this ternary diagram, the solid and dashes curves are the binodal and spinodal, respectively. The straight lines are the tie lines, and the circles represent the critical points. (b) Same phase diagram as (a) but including sticker numbers S = 1−5; to focus on … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Quantitative binding of linker and Rubisco using Slimfield. (a),(b) Rubisco-Atto594 is equilibrated with linker at mutual concentrations insufficient for phase separation, and in￾troduced to a simple microscope chamber. (c) Slimfield reveals how assemblies of Rubisco (magenta, max projection) and/or linker GFP (green) adsorb transiently and nonspecifically to the cover glass. (d) Rapid molecular motion is … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Banani, Hyun O

    Salman F. Banani, Hyun O. Lee, Anthony A. Hyman, and Michael K. Rosen. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology , 18(5):285–298, May 2017. ISSN 1471-0080. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.7. URL https://doi. org/10.1038/nrm.2017.7. ; doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.7

  2. [2]

    Gladfelter

    Christine Roden and Amy S. Gladfelter. RNA contributions to the form and function of biomolecular condensates. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology , 22(3):183–195, March

  3. [3]

    doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0264-6

    ISSN 1471-0080. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0264-6. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41580-020-0264-6 . ; doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0264-6

  4. [4]

    Simon Alberti and Anthony A. Hyman. Biomolecular condensates at the nexus of cellular stress, protein aggregation disease and ageing. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology , 22(3):196–213, March 2021. ISSN 1471-0080. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00326-6. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-00326-6 . ; doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00326-6

  5. [5]

    Holehouse and Simon Alberti

    Alex S. Holehouse and Simon Alberti. Molecular determinants of condensate composition. Focus on patterns in molecular biology , 85(2):290–308, January 2025. ISSN 1097-2765. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.12.021. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2024.12.021. ; doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.12.021

  6. [6]

    Juan Carlos Villarreal and Susanne S. Renner. Hornwort pyrenoids, carbon-concentrating structures, evolved and were lost at least five times during the last 100 million years. Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 109(46):18873–18878, 2012. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1213498109. URL https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1213498109. ; doi:10.1073...

  7. [7]

    James Barrett, Philipp Girr, and Luke C. M. Mackinder. Pyrenoids: CO2-fixing phase separated liquid organelles. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Re- search, 1868(5):118949, 2021. ISSN 0167-4889. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.118949. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.118949. ; doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.118949

  8. [8]

    The pyrenoid: the eukaryotic co2-concentrating organelle

    Shan He, Victoria L Crans, and Martin C Jonikas. The pyrenoid: the eukaryotic co2-concentrating organelle. The Plant Cell , 35(9):3236–3259, 09 2023. ISSN 1040-

  9. [9]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koad157

    doi: 10.1093/plcell/koad157. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koad157. ; doi:10.1093/plcell/koad157

  10. [10]

    The Eukaryotic CO(2)-Concentrating Organelle Is Liquid- like and Exhibits Dynamic Reorganization

    Elizabeth S Freeman Rosenzweig, Bin Xu, Luis Kuhn Cuellar, Antonio Martinez-Sanchez, Miroslava Schaffer, Mike Strauss, Heather N Cartwright, Pierre Ronceray, Jürgen M Plitzko, Friedrich Förster, Ned S Wingreen, Benjamin D Engel, Luke C M Mackinder, and Martin C Jonikas. The Eukaryotic CO(2)-Concentrating Organelle Is Liquid- like and Exhibits Dynamic Reor...

  11. [11]

    Walker, Luke C.M

    Ella Catherall, Sabina Musial, Nicky Atkinson, Charlotte E. Walker, Luke C.M. Mackinder, and Alistair J. McCormick. From algae to plants: understanding pyrenoid-based co<sub>2</sub>-concentrating mechanisms. Trends in Biochemical Sciences , 50(1):33– 45, Jan 2025. ISSN 0968-0004. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2024.10.010. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tibs.2024.10...

  12. [12]

    Lacoste-Royal and S

    G. Lacoste-Royal and S. P. Gibbs. Immunocytochemical localization of ribulose-1,5- bisphosphate carboxylase in the pyrenoid and thylakoid region of the chloroplast of chlamy- domonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiology , 83(3):602–606, 1987. doi: 10.1104/pp.83.3.602. URL https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.83.3.602. ; doi:10.1104/pp.83.3.602. 16

  13. [13]

    O. N. Borkhsenious, C. B. Mason, and J. V. Moroney. The intracellular localiza- tion of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiology , 116(4):1585–1591, 1998. doi: 10.1104/pp.116.4.1585. URL https: //doi.org/10.1104/pp.116.4.1585. ; doi:10.1104/pp.116.4.1585

  14. [14]

    R. M. L. McKay, S. P. Gibbs, and K. C. Vaughn. Rubisco activase is present in the pyrenoid of green algae. Protoplasma, 162(1):38–45, 1991. doi: 10.1007/BF01403899. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01403899. ; doi:10.1007/BF01403899

  15. [15]

    Moromizato and et al

    R. Moromizato and et al. Pyrenoid proteomics reveals independent evolution of the co2- concentrating organelle in chlorarachniophytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(10):e2318542121, 2024. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2318542121. URL https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.2318542121. ; doi:10.1073/pnas.2318542121

  16. [16]

    Diatom pyrenoids are encased in a protein shell that enables efficient co2 fixation

    Ginga Shimakawa, Manon Demulder, Serena Flori, Akihiro Kawamoto, Yoshinori Tsuji, Hermanus Nawaly, Atsuko Tanaka, Rei Tohda, Tadayoshi Ota, Hiroaki Matsui, Natsumi Morishima, and et al. Diatom pyrenoids are encased in a protein shell that enables efficient co2 fixation. Cell, 187(21):5919–5934.e19, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.013. URL https://doi.org...

  17. [17]

    Yamano, T

    T. Yamano, T. Tsujikawa, K. Hatano, S. Ozawa, Y. Takahashi, and H. Fukuzawa. Light and low-co2-dependent lcib–lcic complex localization in the chloroplast supports the carbon- concentrating mechanism in chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant and Cell Physiology , 51 (9):1453–1468, 2010. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq105. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/ pcq105. ; doi:10....

  18. [18]

    Mackinder, Chris Chen, Ryan D

    Luke C.M. Mackinder, Chris Chen, Ryan D. Leib, Weronika Patena, Sean R. Blum, Matthew Rodman, Silvia Ramundo, Christopher M. Adams, and Martin C. Jonikas. A Spatial Interactome Reveals the Protein Organization of the Algal CO2- Concentrating Mechanism. Cell, 171(1):133–147.e14, September 2017. ISSN 0092-8674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.044. URL https://d...

  19. [19]

    Blaza, Benjamin D

    Onyou Nam, Sabina Musiał, Manon Demulder, Caroline McKenzie, Adam Dowle, Matthew Dowson, James Barrett, James N. Blaza, Benjamin D. Engel, and Luke C.M. Mackinder. A protein blueprint of the diatom co<sub>2</sub>-fixing organelle. Cell, 187(21):5935– 5950.e18, Oct 2024. ISSN 0092-8674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.025. URL https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cell.2...

  20. [20]

    Robison, Zhen Guo Oh, Declan Lafferty, Xia Xu, Juan Carlos A

    Tanner A. Robison, Zhen Guo Oh, Declan Lafferty, Xia Xu, Juan Carlos A. Villarreal, Laura H. Gunn, and Fay-Wei Li. Hornworts reveal a spatial model for pyrenoid-based co2-concentrating mechanisms in land plants. Nature Plants , 11(1):63–73, Jan 2025. ISSN 2055-0278. doi: 10.1038/s41477-024-01871-0. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41477-024-01871-0 . ; doi:1...

  21. [21]

    Luke C. M. Mackinder, Moritz T. Meyer, Tabea Mettler-Altmann, Vijay K. Chen, Michael C. Mitchell, Odile Caspari, Erika S. Freeman Rosenzweig, Lone Pallesen, Gra- ham Reeves, Akira Itakura, Ryan Roth, Florian Sommer, Stefan Geimer, Michael Melko- nian, Michael Schroda, Ursula Goodenough, Matteo Pellegrini, and Martin C. Jonikas. A repeat protein links rubi...

  22. [22]

    Meyer, Nicky Atkin- son, Antonio Martinez-Sanchez, Philip D

    Shan He, Hui-Ting Chou, Doreen Matthies, Tobias Wunder, Moritz T. Meyer, Nicky Atkin- son, Antonio Martinez-Sanchez, Philip D. Jeffrey, Sarah A. Port, Weronika Patena, Guan- hua He, Vivian K. Chen, Frederick M. Hughson, Alistair J. McCormick, Oliver Mueller- Cajar, Benjamin D. Engel, Zhiheng Yu, and Martin C. Jonikas. The structural ba- sis of Rubisco pha...

  23. [23]

    Holehouse, and Rohit V

    Jeong-Mo Choi, Alex S. Holehouse, and Rohit V. Pappu. Physical Princi- ples Underlying the Complex Biology of Intracellular Phase Transitions. An- nual Review of Biophysics , 49(Volume 49, 2020):107–133, 2020. ISSN 1936-

  24. [24]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-biophys-121219-081629

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-121219-081629. URL https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-biophys-121219-081629 . ; doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-121219-081629

  25. [25]

    Trevor GrandPre, Yaojun Zhang, Andrew G. T. Pyo, Benjamin Weiner, Je-Luen Li, Mar- tin C. Jonikas, and Ned S. Wingreen. Impact of Linker Length on Biomolecular Condensate Formation. PRX Life , 1(2):023013, December 2023. doi: 10.1103/PRXLife.1.023013. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXLife.1.023013. ; doi:10.1103/PRXLife.1.023013

  26. [26]

    Gherman, Michael Hodgkin- son, Michael Plevin, Luke Mackinder, Mark C

    Alex Payne-Dwyer, Gaurav Kumar, James Barrett, Laura K. Gherman, Michael Hodgkin- son, Michael Plevin, Luke Mackinder, Mark C. Leake, and Charley Schaefer. Pre- dicting Rubisco-Linker Condensation from Titration in the Dilute Phase. Phys. Rev. Lett., 132(21):218401, May 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.218401. URL https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13...

  27. [27]

    Hodgkinson, Ralf P

    Gaurav Kumar, James Barrett, Philippe Van der Stappen, Alex Payne-Dwyer, Onyou Nam, Jack Shepherd, Lewis Frame, Jamieson Howard, Vuk Malis, Clément Dégut, Michael R. Hodgkinson, Ralf P. Richter, Charley Schaefer, Michael J. Plevin, Maria Hondele, Mark C. Leake, Benjamin D. Engel, and Luke C.M. Mackinder. Sticker number modulates pyrenoid condensate assemb...

  28. [28]

    URL https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.27.701992. URL https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27. 701992. ; doi:10.64898/2026.01.27.701992

  29. [29]

    Brangwynne, Peter Tompa, and Rohit V

    Clifford P. Brangwynne, Peter Tompa, and Rohit V. Pappu. Polymer physics of intracel- lular phase transitions. Nature Physics , 11(11):899–904, 2015. doi: 10.1038/nphys3532. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3532. ; doi:10.1038/nphys3532

  30. [30]

    Greber and Cheryl A

    Brandon J. Greber and Cheryl A. Kerfeld. Bacterial microcompartments: Metabolism- enhancing organelles. Nature Reviews Microbiology , 18:677–692, 2020. doi: 10.1038/ s41579-020-0413-0. ; doi:10.1038/s41579-020-0413-0

  31. [31]

    Rethinking pattern formation in reaction– diffusion systems

    Jakob Halatek, Felix Brauns, and Erwin Frey. Rethinking pattern formation in reaction– diffusion systems. Nature Physics , 14:507–514, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41567-017-0040-5. ; doi:10.1038/s41567-017-0040-5

  32. [32]

    Structure and function of rubisco

    Inger Andersson and Anders Backlund. Structure and function of rubisco. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry , 46(3):275–291, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.01.001. ; doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.01.001

  33. [33]

    Evans, Graham S

    Susanne von Caemmerer, John R. Evans, Graham S. Hudson, and T. John Andrews. The kinetics of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in vivo inferred from measure- ments of photosynthesis in leaves of transgenic tobacco. Planta, 195(1):88–97, November

  34. [34]

    doi: 10.1007/BF00206296

    ISSN 1432-2048. doi: 10.1007/BF00206296. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00206296. ; doi:10.1007/BF00206296. 18

  35. [35]

    Despite slow catalysis and confused substrate specificity, all ribulose bisphosphate carboxylases may be nearly perfectly optimized

    Guillaume G B Tcherkez, Graham D Farquhar, and T John Andrews. Despite slow catalysis and confused substrate specificity, all ribulose bisphosphate carboxylases may be nearly perfectly optimized. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 103(19):7246–7251, April

  36. [36]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600605103

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600605103. URL https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600605103. ; doi:10.1073/pnas.0600605103

  37. [37]

    Microalgal carbon-dioxide-concentrating mechanisms: Chlamy- domonas inorganic carbon transporters

    Martin H Spalding. Microalgal carbon-dioxide-concentrating mechanisms: Chlamy- domonas inorganic carbon transporters. J. Exp. Bot. , 59(7):1463–1473, 2008. doi: 10.1093/ jxb/erm128. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm128. ; doi:10.1093/jxb/erm128

  38. [38]

    Moroney and Rosa A

    James V. Moroney and Rosa A. Ynalvez. Proposed carbon dioxide concentrating mecha- nism in chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryotic Cell , 6(8):1251–1259, 2007. doi: 10.1128/ EC.00064-07. URL https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00064-07. ; doi:10.1128/EC.00064-07

  39. [39]

    The chlamydomonas reinhardtii cia3 mutant lacking a thylakoid lumen-localized car- bonic anhydrase is limited by CO2 supply to rubisco and not photosystem II function in vivo

    David Thomas Hanson, Linda A Franklin, Goran Samuelsson, and Murray R Badger. The chlamydomonas reinhardtii cia3 mutant lacking a thylakoid lumen-localized car- bonic anhydrase is limited by CO2 supply to rubisco and not photosystem II function in vivo. Plant Physiol. , 132(4):2267–2275, August 2003. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.023481. ; doi:10.1104/pp.103.023481

  40. [40]

    Acclimation to very low CO2: contribu- tion of limiting CO2 inducible proteins, LCIB and LCIA, to inorganic carbon up- take in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

    Yingjun Wang and Martin H Spalding. Acclimation to very low CO2: contribu- tion of limiting CO2 inducible proteins, LCIB and LCIA, to inorganic carbon up- take in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. , 166(4):2040–2050, December

  41. [41]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.248294

    doi: 10.1104/pp.114.248294. URL https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.248294. ; doi:10.1104/pp.114.248294

  42. [42]

    S. Jin, J. Sun, T. Wunder, D. Tang, A. B. Cousins, S. K. Sze, O. Mueller-Cajar, and Y.-G. Gao. Structural insights into the lcib protein family reveals a new group of β)- carbonic anhydrases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 113(51):14716–14721, 2016. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616294113. URL https: //doi.org/10.10...

  43. [43]

    Wilson, Niall M

    Chenyi Fei, Alexandra T. Wilson, Niall M. Mangan, Ned S. Wingreen, and Martin C. Jonikas. Modelling the pyrenoid-based CO2-concentrating mechanism provides insights into its operating principles and a roadmap for its engineering into crops. Nature Plants , 8(5):583–595, May 2022. ISSN 2055-0278. doi: 10.1038/s41477-022-01153-7. URL https: //doi.org/10.103...

  44. [44]

    Reaction-diffusion modeling provides insights into biophysical carbon-concentrating mechanisms in land plants

    Joshua A M Kaste, Berkley J Walker, and Yair Shachar-Hill. Reaction-diffusion modeling provides insights into biophysical carbon-concentrating mechanisms in land plants. Plant Physiology, 196(2):1374–1390, June 2024. ISSN 0032-0889. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiae324. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiae324. ; doi:10.1093/plphys/kiae324

  45. [45]

    A pyrenoid-based CO2- concentrating mechanism can be effective and efficient even under scenarios of high mem- brane CO2 permeability

    Chenyi Fei, Ned S Wingreen, and Martin C Jonikas. A pyrenoid-based CO2- concentrating mechanism can be effective and efficient even under scenarios of high mem- brane CO2 permeability. Plant Physiology , 198(4):kiaf316, August 2025. ISSN 0032-

  46. [46]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaf316

    doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiaf316. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaf316. ; doi:10.1093/plphys/kiaf316

  47. [47]

    Goldstein

    Raymond E. Goldstein. Green algae as model organisms for biological fluid dynam- ics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics , 47(Volume 47, 2015):343–375, 2015. ISSN 1545-4479. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141426. URL https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-fluid-010313-141426 . ; doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141426

  48. [48]

    Ronald G. Larson. The Structure and Rheology of Complex Fluids . Topics in Chemical Engineering. Oxford University Press, New York, 1999. ISBN 0-19-512197-X. 19

  49. [49]

    T. C. B. McLeish. Tube theory of entangled polymer dynamics. Advances in Physics , 51 (6):1379–1527, 2002. doi: 10.1080/00018730210153216. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00018730210153216. ; doi:10.1080/00018730210153216

  50. [50]

    Chaikin and Tom C

    Paul M. Chaikin and Tom C. Lubensky. Principles of Condensed Mat- ter Physics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. URL https: //www.cambridge.org/core/books/principles-of-condensed-matter-physics/ 70C3D677A9B5BEC4A77CBBD0A8A23E64. ; link

  51. [51]

    A guide to understanding and measuring photosynthetic induction: considerations and recommendations

    Liana G Acevedo-Siaca and Lorna McAusland. A guide to understanding and measuring photosynthetic induction: considerations and recommendations. New Phytologist , 247(2): 450–469, 2025. doi: 10.1111/nph.70218. ; doi:10.1111/nph.70218

  52. [52]

    Abu-Ghosh, D

    S. Abu-Ghosh, D. Fixler, Z. Dubinsky, and D. Iluz. Flashing light in microalgae biotech- nology. Bioresource Technology, 203:357–363, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.057. ; doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.057

  53. [53]

    Schulze, Rui Guerra, Hugo Pereira, Lisa M

    Peter S.C. Schulze, Rui Guerra, Hugo Pereira, Lisa M. Schüler, and João C.S. Varela. Flashing leds for microalgal production. Trends in Biotechnol- ogy, 35(11):1088–1101, 2017. ISSN 0167-7799. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tibtech.2017.07.011. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0167779917301919. ; doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.07.011

  54. [54]

    P. L. Silveston and R. R. Hudgins, editors. Periodic Operation of Chemi- cal Reactors . Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2013. ISBN 978-0-12-391854-3. doi: 10.1016/C2010-0-67302-0. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/C2010-0-67302-0 . ; doi:10.1016/C2010-0-67302-0

  55. [55]

    Harry Walter and Donald E. Brooks. Phase separation in cytoplasm, due to macromolecular crowding, is the basis for microcompartmentation. FEBS Letters, 361(2-3):135–139, March

  56. [56]

    doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00159-7

    ISSN 0014-5793. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00159-7. URL https://doi.org/10. 1016/0014-5793(95)00159-7. ; doi:10.1016/0014-5793(95)00159-7

  57. [57]

    Tanja Mittag and Rohit V. Pappu. A conceptual framework for understanding phase separation and addressing open questions and challenges. Molecular Cell , 82(12):2201– 2214, June 2022. ISSN 1097-2765. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.018. URL https://doi. org/10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.018. ; doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.018

  58. [58]

    Lyon, William B

    Alexis S. Lyon, William B. Peeples, and Michael K. Rosen. A framework for understanding the functions of biomolecular condensates across scales. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 22:215–235, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00303-z. URL https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41580-020-00303-z . ; doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00303-z

  59. [59]

    Associations leading to formation of reversible networks and gels

    Michael Rubinstein and Audrey V Dobrynin. Associations leading to formation of reversible networks and gels. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science , 4(1):83–87, 1999. ISSN 1359-0294. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0294(99)00013-8. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1359-0294(99)00013-8. ; doi:10.1016/S1359-0294(99)00013-8

  60. [60]

    Michael Rubinstein and Ralph H. Colby. Polymer Physics . Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003. ISBN 9780198520597. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198520597.001.0001. ; doi:10.1093/oso/9780198520597.001.0001

  61. [61]

    Glotzer and Michael J

    Sharon C. Glotzer and Michael J. Solomon. Anisotropy of building blocks and their assem- bly into complex structures. Nature Materials , 6:557–562, 2007. doi: 10.1038/nmat1949. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1949. ; doi:10.1038/nmat1949. 20

  62. [62]

    Emanuela Bianchi, Ronald Blaak, and Christos N. Likos. Patchy colloids: state of the art and perspectives. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , 13:6397–6410, 2011. doi: 10.1039/ C0CP02296A. URL https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CP02296A. ; doi:10.1039/C0CP02296A

  63. [63]

    The molecular basis for cellular function of intrinsically disordered protein regions

    Alex S Holehouse and Birthe B Kragelund. The molecular basis for cellular function of intrinsically disordered protein regions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. , 25(3):187–211, March

  64. [64]

    doi:10.1038/s41580-023-00673-0

    doi: 10.1038/s41580-023-00673-0. ; doi:10.1038/s41580-023-00673-0

  65. [65]

    Pyo, Andrej Košmrlj, and Ned S

    Qiwei Yu, Trevor GrandPre, Andrew G.T. Pyo, Andrej Košmrlj, and Ned S. Wingreen. Membrane-anchored mobile tethers modulate condensate wetting, localization, and migra- tion. bioRxiv, 2025. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.04.626804. URL https://doi.org/10.1101/ 2024.12.04.626804. ; doi:10.1101/2024.12.04.626804

  66. [66]

    Jonikas, Ned S

    Guanhua He, Trevor GrandPre, Hugh Wilson, Yaojun Zhang, Martin C. Jonikas, Ned S. Wingreen, and Quan Wang. Phase-separating pyrenoid proteins form complexes in the dilute phase. Communications Biology , 6(1):19, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04373-x. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-04373-x . ; doi:10.1038/s42003-022-04373- x

  67. [67]

    Wadhams, and Mark C

    Michael Plank, George H. Wadhams, and Mark C. Leake. Millisecond timescale slimfield imaging and automated quantification of single fluorescent protein molecules for use in probing complex biological processes. Integrative Biology, 1(10):602–612, 2009. doi: 10. 1039/B907837A. ; doi:10.1039/B907837A

  68. [68]

    Brangwynne

    Yongdae Shin and Clifford P. Brangwynne. Liquid phase condensation in cell phys- iology and disease. Science, 357(6357):eaaf4382, 2017. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4382. ; doi:10.1126/science.aaf4382

  69. [69]

    Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics

    Pierre-Gilles de Gennes. Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics . Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1979. ISBN 9780801412035. URL https://www.cornellpress.cornell. edu/book/9780801412035/scaling-concepts-in-polymer-physics/ . ; link

  70. [70]

    Lemma, Alejandro Martinez-Calvo, Guanhua He, Jessica H

    Shan He, Linnea M. Lemma, Alejandro Martinez-Calvo, Guanhua He, Jessica H. Hen- nacy, Lianyong Wang, Sabrina L. Ergun, Ashwani K. Rai, Colton Wang, Luke Bunday, Angelo Kayser-Browne, Quan Wang, Clifford P. Brangwynne, Ned S. Wingreen, and Mar- tin C. Jonikas. Kinase key1 controls pyrenoid condensate size throughout the cell cycle by disrupting phase separ...

  71. [71]

    Schaefer, Jasper J

    C. Schaefer, Jasper J. Michels, and Paul van der Schoot. Structuring of thin-film poly- mer mixtures upon solvent evaporation. Macromolecules, 49:6858–6870, 2016. doi: 10. 1021/acs.macromol.6b00537. URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00537. ; doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00537

  72. [72]

    Holdsworth

    R.H. Holdsworth. The presence of a crystalline matrix in pyrenoids of the diatom, achnan- thes brevipes. The Journal of cell biology , 37(3):831 – 837, 1968. doi: 10.1083/jcb.37.3.831. URL https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.37.3.831. ; doi:10.1083/jcb.37.3.831

  73. [73]

    Kowallik

    K. Kowallik. The crystal lattice of the pyrenoid matrix of prorocentrum micans. Journal of Cell Science , 5(1):251–269, 07 1969. ISSN 0021-9533. doi: 10.1242/jcs.5.1.251. URL https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.5.1.251. ; doi:10.1242/jcs.5.1.251

  74. [74]

    B. L. Bertagnolli and M. J. Nadakavukaren. An ultrastructural study of pyrenoids from chlorella pyrenoidosa. Journal of Cell Science , 7(3):623–630, 11 1970. ISSN 0021-9533. doi: 10.1242/jcs.7.3.623. URL https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.7.3.623. ; doi:10.1242/jcs.7.3.623. 21

  75. [75]

    Engel, Miroslava Schaffer, Luis Kuhn Cuellar, Elizabeth Villa, Jürgen M

    Benjamin D. Engel, Miroslava Schaffer, Luis Kuhn Cuellar, Elizabeth Villa, Jürgen M. Plitzko, and Wolfgang Baumeister. Native architecture of the chlamydomonas chloroplast revealed by in situ cryo-electron tomography. eLife, 2015(4), 2015. doi: 10.7554/eLife. 04889. URL https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04889. ; doi:10.7554/eLife.04889

  76. [76]

    Griffiths

    Dilwyn J. Griffiths. The pyrenoid. The Botanical Review, 36(1):29 – 58, 1970. doi: 10.1007/ BF02859154. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859154. ; doi:10.1007/BF02859154

  77. [77]

    M. T. Meyer, H. Griffiths, et al. The pyrenoid is the site of co 2-concentrating mechanism in chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Journal of Experimental Botany , 63:1859–1869, 2012. doi: 10. 1093/jxb/err399. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err399. ; doi:10.1093/jxb/err399

  78. [78]

    Hennacy, Nicky Atkinson, Angelo Kayser-Browne, Sabrina L

    Jessica H. Hennacy, Nicky Atkinson, Angelo Kayser-Browne, Sabrina L. Ergun, Eric Franklin, Lianyong Wang, Simona Eicke, Yana Kazachkova, Moshe Kafri, Friedrich Fauser, Josep Vilarrasa-Blasi, Robert E. Jinkerson, Samuel C. Zeeman, Alistair J. McCormick, and Martin C. Jonikas. Saga1 and mith1 produce matrix-traversing membranes in the co2-fixing pyrenoid. N...

  79. [79]

    Bestrophin-like protein 4 is involved in photosynthetic acclimation to light fluctuations in chlamydomonas

    Liat Adler, Chun Sing Lau, Kashif M Shaikh, Kim A van Maldegem, Alex L Payne-Dwyer, Cecile Lefoulon, Philipp Girr, Nicky Atkinson, James Barrett, Tom Z Emrich-Mills, Emilija Dukic, Michael R Blatt, Mark C Leake, Gilles Peltier, Cornelia Spetea, Adrien Burlacot, Al- istair J McCormick, Luke C M Mackinder, and Charlotte E Walker. Bestrophin-like protein 4 i...

  80. [80]

    Perilla, and Peijun Zhang

    Nadav Elad, Zhen Hou, Maud Dumoux, Alireza Ramezani, Juan R. Perilla, and Peijun Zhang. In-cell structure and variability of pyrenoid rubisco. Nature Communications , 16(1):7763, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62998-y. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-025-62998-y . ; doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62998-y

Showing first 80 references.