Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 75 references

A one-band Hubbard model on the checkerboard lattice is already unstable to altermagnetism at weak coupling, and its magnons inherit an alternating chirality splitting that mirrors the electronic spin split.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 01:22 UTC pith:RZ73OGIJ

load-bearing objection Clean weak-coupling itinerant platform for altermagnetism on the checkerboard lattice, with a usable chiral-magnon fingerprint; solid textbook calculation, not a conceptual breakthrough.

arxiv 2607.06106 v1 pith:RZ73OGIJ submitted 2026-07-07 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall

Weak-coupling altermagnetism and chiral magnetic excitations in a checkerboard lattice

Abhigya Rangari , Manna Paul , Sayandip Ghosh This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords altermagnetismcheckerboard latticeHubbard modelweak-coupling instabilitychiral magnonsRPA spin susceptibilityspin-split bands
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the checkerboard lattice is a natural electronic host for altermagnetism. In a minimal one-band Hubbard model with hoppings up to third neighbors, the static altermagnetic susceptibility (built from sublattice-resolved spin operators) diverges at the zone center already at weak coupling, while the ordinary spin susceptibility stays smooth. A self-consistent Hartree–Fock treatment then produces a staggered magnetization that does not enlarge the unit cell; as the repulsion is raised the system passes from a normal semimetal through an altermagnetic semimetal into an altermagnetic insulator, with momentum-dependent spin splitting that is odd under C4 rotation. Random-phase-approximation spin-wave spectra remain positive throughout the Brillouin zone, confirming stability against fluctuations. Most strikingly, the two magnon chiralities split in an alternating pattern that tracks the electronic spin splitting, a direct consequence of anisotropic second-neighbor hopping. That alternating chiral split is offered as a spectroscopic fingerprint of altermagnetism that can be read by inelastic neutron scattering.

Core claim

Itinerant electrons on the checkerboard lattice develop a weak-coupling instability toward altermagnetic order (diverging altermagnetic susceptibility at q=0). Mean-field theory yields successive transitions into altermagnetic semimetallic and insulating phases with d-wave spin-split bands; the same order supports stable, chirality-split magnons whose alternating spectral densities mirror the electronic spin splitting and arise from anisotropic second-neighbor hopping.

What carries the argument

The altermagnetic susceptibility χ_AM built from the sublattice-odd spin operator S̃(q)= au_z, whose RPA divergence at q o0 signals the ordering tendency; once the order is established, the same symmetry (time-reversal composed with C4) is inherited by the RPA transverse spin susceptibilities, producing the alternating chirality splitting of the magnons.

Load-bearing premise

That the random-phase approximation for the dynamical spin susceptibility remains reliable in the intermediate-coupling window where the staggered moment is only partial and Stoner edges sit close to the magnon branches.

What would settle it

A measurement (or higher-order calculation) of the magnon spectral densities on a checkerboard-lattice Hubbard system that shows either no alternating chirality splitting or negative spin-wave energies in any part of the Brillouin zone would falsify the central claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The alternating chirality split of magnons becomes a concrete, direction-dependent fingerprint that inelastic neutron scattering can use to identify altermagnets.
  • Because the split survives Stoner damping and reaches tens of meV for realistic hoppings, THz-range chiral spin currents become experimentally accessible.
  • The same C4∘T symmetry that produces the electronic and magnonic splits can be engineered into cold-atom optical lattices realizing the Hubbard model on a checkerboard geometry.
  • Strong-coupling reduction of the model recovers a Heisenberg Hamiltonian whose linear spin-wave theory reproduces the same chiral splitting, linking itinerant and localized descriptions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism is generic for any lattice whose second-neighbor hoppings break PT while preserving C4∘T; the same construction should therefore work on related non-Bravais lattices.
  • Because the chiral anisotropy is already large at intermediate U, materials that sit near the semimetal–insulator boundary may offer the cleanest neutron-scattering window before charge fluctuations wash out the split.
  • The Goldstone-mode linearity and the absence of magnetic anisotropy imply that any real-material realization will require only weak spin-orbit coupling to open a small gap, leaving the alternating split intact at higher energies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a minimal one-band Hubbard model on the checkerboard lattice and shows that it is unstable to altermagnetic order already at weak coupling, as indicated by a diverging static altermagnetic susceptibility (defined via sublattice-resolved spin operators) at q=0. Self-consistent Hartree-Fock decoupling of the interaction produces successive transitions from a nonmagnetic semimetal to an altermagnetic semimetal and then to an altermagnetic insulator, with momentum-dependent spin splitting of the bands that respects the combined C4T symmetry of the lattice. Random-phase-approximation evaluation of the dynamical transverse spin susceptibilities then demonstrates that the ordered phases support stable, Goldstone-mode magnons whose spectral densities exhibit an alternating chirality splitting that tracks the electronic spin splitting; the same dispersion is recovered analytically in the strong-coupling Heisenberg limit (Appendices B–C).

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a clean, minimal itinerant platform for weak-coupling altermagnetism and for the associated chiral magnon spectrum, complementing existing spin-model and first-principles studies. The explicit microscopic link between the electronic C4T symmetry and the alternating chirality splitting of the magnons, together with the sizable predicted splitting (tens of meV for realistic hoppings), constitutes a falsifiable fingerprint for inelastic neutron scattering and a potentially useful feature for spin-caloritronic applications. The analytic strong-coupling match and the transparent symmetry arguments are particular strengths that make the paper a useful reference for both theory and experiment.

minor comments (5)
  1. Section headings contain residual spacing artifacts from PDF extraction (e.g., “AL TERMAGNETIC INST ABILITY”, “HAR TREE-FOCK APPROXIMA TION”, “MAGNETIC EXCIT A TIONS”); these should be cleaned for the published version.
  2. Fig. 2(b) uses two different vertical scales for the spin and altermagnetic channels; a brief note in the caption would help the reader avoid misreading the relative magnitudes.
  3. The comparison with the related square-lattice RPA study of Maier et al. (Ref. 52) is mentioned only briefly; a short paragraph clarifying the distinct origin of the order (nesting-free q=0 instability versus orthorhombic anisotropy) would improve context.
  4. In Eq. (15) the order-parameter definition uses an alternating sign convention that is later restated in words; a single, explicit formula for the staggered magnetization would remove any ambiguity.
  5. Appendix A shows robustness to small changes in t2 and t3, but the main text never states the precise half-filling condition used for the chemical-potential adjustment; a one-sentence clarification would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: susceptibilities, Hartree–Fock order, and RPA magnons are computed from the microscopic Hubbard Hamiltonian without fitted targets or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The altermagnetic susceptibility is defined via the staggered (τ_z) channel and evaluated from the non-interacting checkerboard bands; its divergence at q→0 is a numerical result of that calculation, not an input. The Hartree–Fock order parameter m is the corresponding staggered magnetization; once m is solved self-consistently, spin-split bands and the AMSM/AMI sequence follow from the mean-field Hamiltonian by construction of the decoupling, which is standard Stoner/mean-field logic rather than circular re-labeling of a fitted quantity. Dynamical RPA transverse susceptibilities are built from the same mean-field eigenstates; positive magnon energies and alternating chirality splitting are outputs of those poles/spectral functions and track the C4T symmetry already present in the lattice Hamiltonian. The strong-coupling expansion (App. B) recovering the Heisenberg Holstein–Primakoff dispersion (App. C) is an internal consistency check expected from the Hubbard→Heisenberg reduction, not a prediction forced by fitting. Hopping ratios (t2/t1, t3/t1) are free model parameters, not adjusted to external altermagnetic data. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation; citations to prior altermagnet and checkerboard literature supply context, not the load-bearing steps. Mild application of the modern “altermagnet” label to Néel order on a C4-related bipartite lattice is classification, not renaming that substitutes for calculation. Score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the standard single-band Hubbard model, the Hartree-Fock and RPA approximations, half-filling, and a small set of chosen hoppings. No new particles or forces are postulated; the altermagnetic order parameter is the conventional staggered magnetization compatible with C4 symmetry.

free parameters (4)
  • t2/t1 = 0.4
    Second-neighbor hopping fixed at 0.4 (and varied slightly in App. A); controls the strength of the anisotropic spin splitting and chiral magnon dispersion.
  • t3/t1 = 0.1
    Third-neighbor hopping fixed at 0.1; enters the strong-coupling J3 and the high-energy magnon shape.
  • temperature T = 0.01
    Fixed at 0.01 t1 for all self-consistent and susceptibility calculations.
  • broadening δ = 0.001
    Analytic-continuation infinitesimal set to 0.001; affects peak widths but not qualitative conclusions.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Single-band Hubbard model with hoppings up to third neighbors on the checkerboard lattice is an adequate microscopic description.
    Stated in Sec. II; multi-orbital or longer-range Coulomb terms are neglected.
  • domain assumption Hartree-Fock decoupling captures the essential altermagnetic order parameter and band splitting.
    Sec. IV; used to obtain the phase diagram and spin-split bands.
  • domain assumption Random-phase approximation for the transverse spin susceptibility yields reliable magnon dispersions and spectral weights.
    Sec. V; standard for intermediate-coupling itinerant magnets but uncontrolled when Stoner continuum approaches the magnon branch.
  • domain assumption Half-filling and absence of spin-orbit coupling.
    Chemical potential tuned to n=1 throughout; non-relativistic splitting is emphasized.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 22346 in / 2372 out tokens · 29474 ms · 2026-07-11T01:22:41.761409+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Altermagnets, characterized by spin-split electronic bands with compensated magnetic moments, have emerged as a new class of magnetic materials garnering attention in recent years. Here, using a minimal one-band Hubbard model, we show that the checkerboard lattice serves as a natural platform for altermagnetism for electrons. The instability towards altermagnetic order is denoted by diverging altermagnetic susceptibility at weak-coupling. Carrying out mean-field treatment of the Hubbard repulsion, we show phase transitions from the nonmagnetic to altermagnetic semimetal and then to altermagnetic insulating phase, allowing clear identification of spin-split states. We then examine magnetic excitations in the altermagnetic phases using a random-phase approximation treatment of the dynamical spin susceptibility. The altermagnetic order is found to be stable against spin-fluctuations with the excitation spectra showing well-defined magnon excitations, which decay into single-particle excitations with decreasing interaction strength. Remarkably, the magnetic excitations exhibit strong dependence on both chirality and direction, showing an alternating chirality splitting, similar to the alternating spin splitting of the electronic bands, which serves as a salient feature of altermagnetism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06106 by Abhigya Rangari, Manna Paul, Sayandip Ghosh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The checkerboard lattice with sublattices [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) The static bare altermagnetic susceptibil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The order parameter (red) and exchange field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Spin-resolved band structure from Eq. (2) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Imaginary part of RPA transverse susceptibilities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (a) The order parameter from the self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculation for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X14, 031039 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representa- tion theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Z.-F. Gao, S. Qu, B. Zeng, Y. Liu, J.-R. Wen, H. Sun, P.- J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, AI-accelerated discovery of alter- magnetic materials, Natl. Sci. Rev.12, nwaf066 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Qu, Z.-F

    S. Qu, Z.-F. Ouyang, Z.-F. Gao, H. Sun, K. Liu, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Extremely strong spin-orbit coupling effect in light-element altermagnetic materials, Front. Phys.21, 045203 (2026)

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    Newly discovered magnetic phase: A brief review on Altermagnets

    R. Tamang, S. Gurung, D. P. Rai, S. Brahimi, and S. Lou- nis, Newly discovered magnetic phase: A brief review on altermagnets, arXiv:2412.05377

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Beida, E

    W. Beida, E. S ¸a¸ sıo˘ glu, C. Friedrich, G. Bihlmayer, Y. Mokrousov, and S. Bl¨ ugel, Chiral split magnons in metallic g-wave altermagnets: insights from many- body perturbation theory, npj Quantum Materials10, 97 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Fedchenkoet al., Observation of time-reversal sym- metry breaking in the band structure of altermagnetic RuO2, Sci

    O. Fedchenkoet al., Observation of time-reversal sym- metry breaking in the band structure of altermagnetic RuO2, Sci. Adv.10, eadj4883 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Guoet al., Direct and inverse spin splitting effects in altermagnetic RuO2, Adv

    Y. Guoet al., Direct and inverse spin splitting effects in altermagnetic RuO2, Adv. Sci.11, 2400967 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Zantiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Ferroically ordered mag- netic octupoles ind-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. X14, 011019 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. ˇSmejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in alter- magnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. B109, 115102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Krempask` y, L

    J. Krempask` y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. D’souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. Constanti- nou, V. Strocov, and D. Usanov, Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy, Nature626, 517 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, and A. Chakraborty, Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nat. Commun.15, 2116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Dinget al., Large band splitting ing-wave altermagnet CrSb, Phys

    J. Dinget al., Large band splitting ing-wave altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    C. Li, M. Hu, Z. Li, Y. Wang, W. Chen, B. Thiagarajan, M. Leandersson, C. Polley, T. Kim, and H. Liu, Topo- logical weyl altermagnetism in CrSb, Commun. Phys.8, 311 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, and L.ˇSmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118(2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Naget al., GdAlSi: An antiferromagnetic topological weyl semimetal with nonrelativistic spin splitting, Phys

    J. Naget al., GdAlSi: An antiferromagnetic topological weyl semimetal with nonrelativistic spin splitting, Phys. Rev. B110, 224436 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Y. Guo, H. Liu, O. Janson, I. C. Fulga, J. van den Brink, and J. I. Facio, Spin-split collinear antiferromag- nets: A large-scale ab-initio study, Mater. Today Phys. 32, 100991 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Attias, A

    L. Attias, A. Levchenko, and M. Khodas, Intrinsic anomalous hall effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 094425 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Fenget al., An anomalous hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat

    Z. Fenget al., An anomalous hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron.5, 735 (2022). 11

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Q. Cui, B. Zeng, P. Cui, T. Yu, and H. Yang, Efficient spin seebeck and spin nernst effects of magnons in alter- magnets, Phys. Rev. B108, 180401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Crystal thermal transport in altermagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 056701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    I. V. Solovyev, Magneto-optical effect in the weak ferro- magnets LaMO 3 (M = Cr, Mn, and Fe), Phys. Rev. B 55, 8060 (1997)

    work page 1997

  29. [29]

    Vakili, E

    H. Vakili, E. Schwartz, and A. A. Kovalev, Spin-transfer torque in altermagnets with magnetic textures, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 176401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneˇ s, Antifer- romagnetism in RuO2 asd-wave pomeranchuk instability, Phys. Rev. B99, 184432 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. c. v. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Pre- diction of low-Zcollinear and noncollinear antiferro- magnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 014409 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Egorov and E

    S. Egorov and E. Robert, Colossal spin splitting in the monolayer of the collinear antiferromagnet MnF 2, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 2363 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    P. Das, V. Leeb, J. Knolle, and M. Knap, Realizing al- termagnetism in Fermi-Hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 263402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    J. Li, J. Liu, X. Yang, and H.-K. Tang, Enhancement ofd-wave pairing in strongly correlated altermagnet, arXiv:2505.12342

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Ma and J.-F

    H.-Y. Ma and J.-F. Jia, Altermagnetic topological insu- lator with⌋-paired spin-valley locking, Quantum Front. 3, 22 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    S. He, J. Zhao, H.-G. Luo, and S. Hu, Altermagnetism and beyond in thet−t ′ −δFermi-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B112, 035108 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    A. Bose, S. Vadnais, and A. Paramekanti, Altermag- netism and superconductivity in a multiorbitalt-J model, Phys. Rev. B110, 205120 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Y. Che, H. Lv, X. Wu, and J. Yang, Engineering alter- magnetic states in two-dimensional square tessellations, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 036701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Q. Wang, R. Wu, and J. Hu, Spin-biased quantum spin hall effect in altermagnetic Lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 113, 161101 (2026)

    work page 2026

  41. [41]

    Kaushal and M

    N. Kaushal and M. Franz, Altermagnetism in modi- fied Lieb lattice Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 156502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Biswas, Achintyaa, and P

    S. Biswas, Achintyaa, and P. Dutta, Altermagnetic phases and phase transitions in Lieb-5 Hubbard model, arXiv:2601.14200

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Ferrari and R

    F. Ferrari and R. Valent´ ı, Altermagnetism on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice, Phys. Rev. B110, 205140 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    T. Sato, S. Haddad, I. C. Fulga, F. F. Assaad, and J. van den Brink, Altermagnetic anomalous hall effect emerging from electronic correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 086503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Minimal models for altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B110, 144412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O. c. v. ˇSipr, J. Sinova, and T. c. v. Jungwirth, Chiral magnons in altermagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 256703 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    P. M. Cˆ onsoli and M. Vojta, SU(n) altermagnetism: Lat- tice models, magnon modes, and flavor-split bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 196701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    K. V. Yershov, V. P. Kravchuk, M. Daghofer, and J. van den Brink, Fluctuation-induced piezomagnetism in local moment altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 144421 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Quantum effects in the magnon spectrum of 2D altermagnets via continuous similarity transformations

    R. Wiedmann, D.-B. Hering, V. Sulaiman, M. R. Walther, K. P. Schmidt, and G. S. Uhrig, Quantum ef- fects in the magnon spectrum of 2D altermagnets via continuous similarity transformations, arXiv:2511.03528

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    X. Zhu, X. Huo, S. Feng, S.-B. Zhang, S. A. Yang, and H. Guo, Design of altermagnetic models from spin clus- ters, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 166701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Vijayvargia, E

    A. Vijayvargia, E. Day-Roberts, A. S. Botana, and O. Erten, Altermagnets with topological order in kitaev bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 166701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    T. A. Maier and S. Okamoto, Weak-coupling theory of neutron scattering as a probe of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B108, L100402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    E. H. Lieb and P. Schupp, Ground state properties of a fully frustrated quantum spin system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5362 (1999)

    work page 1999

  54. [54]

    S. E. Palmer and J. T. Chalker, Order induced by dipolar interactions in a geometrically frustrated antiferromag- net, Phys. Rev. B62, 488 (2000)

    work page 2000

  55. [55]

    S. E. Palmer and J. T. Chalker, Quantum disorder in the two-dimensional pyrochlore heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B64, 094412 (2001)

    work page 2001

  56. [56]

    O. A. Starykh, R. R. P. Singh, and G. C. Levine, Spinons in a crossed-chains model of a 2D spin liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 167203 (2002)

    work page 2002

  57. [57]

    Canals, From the square lattice to the checkerboard lattice: Spin-wave and large-nlimit analysis, Phys

    B. Canals, From the square lattice to the checkerboard lattice: Spin-wave and large-nlimit analysis, Phys. Rev. B65, 184408 (2002)

    work page 2002

  58. [58]

    Fouet, M

    J.-B. Fouet, M. Mambrini, P. Sindzingre, and C. Lhuil- lier, Planar pyrochlore: A valence-bond crystal, Phys. Rev. B67, 054411 (2003)

    work page 2003

  59. [59]

    E. Berg, E. Altman, and A. Auerbach, Singlet excitations in pyrochlore: A study of quantum frustration, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 147204 (2003)

    work page 2003

  60. [60]

    Tchernyshyov, O

    O. Tchernyshyov, O. A. Starykh, R. Moessner, and A. G. Abanov, Bond order from disorder in the planar py- rochlore magnet, Phys. Rev. B68, 144422 (2003)

    work page 2003

  61. [61]

    Bernier, C.-H

    J.-S. Bernier, C.-H. Chung, Y. B. Kim, and S. Sachdev, Planar pyrochlore antiferromagnet: A large-nanalysis, Phys. Rev. B69, 214427 (2004)

    work page 2004

  62. [62]

    Moessner, O

    R. Moessner, O. Tchernyshyov, and S. L. Sondhi, Planar pyrochlore, quantum ice and sliding ice, J. Stat. Phys. 116, 755–772 (2004)

    work page 2004

  63. [63]

    Daghofer, K

    M. Daghofer, K. Wohlfeld, and J. van den Brink, Alter- magnetic polarons: The fate of altermagnetic band split- tings at strong coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 146502 (2026)

    work page 2026

  64. [64]

    N. A. Spaldin, S.-W. Cheong, and S. Griffin, Why are there so few non-altermagnetic antiferromagnets?, 12 arXiv:2602.17181

    work page arXiv

  65. [65]

    Auerbach,Interacting Electrons and Quantum Mag- netism, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer New York, 1994)

    A. Auerbach,Interacting Electrons and Quantum Mag- netism, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer New York, 1994)

    work page 1994

  66. [66]

    Zhang, X.-S

    Y.-F. Zhang, X.-S. Ni, K. Chen, and K. Cao, Chiral magnon splitting in altermagnetic CrSb from first prin- ciples, Phys. Rev. B111, 174451 (2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    J. W. Gonz´ alez, R. A. Gallardo, N. Vidal-Silva, and A. M. Le´ on, Topological chiral magnons in the alter- magnet AgF 2 monolayer, Chin. Phys. Lett.43, 020705 (2026)

    work page 2026

  68. [68]

    Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Masuda, Chiral split magnon in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 156702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Q. Sun, J. Guo, D. Wang, D. L. Abernathy, W. Tian, and C. Li, Observation of chiral magnon band splitting in altermagnetic hematite, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 186703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Hoyer, P

    R. Hoyer, P. P. Stavropoulos, A. Razpopov, R. Valent´ ı, L. ˇSmejkal, and A. Mook, Altermagnetic splitting of magnons in hematiteα-Fe 2O3, Phys. Rev. B112, 064425 (2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    A. T. Costa, J. C. G. Henriques, and J. Fern´ andez- Rossier, Giant spatial anisotropy of magnon Landau damping in altermagnets, SciPost Phys.18, 125 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    We assume typical hopping parameter value oft 1 ∼200 meV for transition metals

    work page

  73. [73]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakat- suji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous hall antiferromagnets, Nat. Rev. Mater.7, 482 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    Y. Liu, R. Shrestha, K. Denisov, D. Ayala, M. van Schilf- gaarde, W. Nie, and I. ˇZuti´ c, Unconventional spintronics from chiral perovskites, Advanced Functional Materials 35, e09127 (2025)

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    Altermagnetic spintronics

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, P. Wadley, D. Kriegner, H. Re- ichlova, F. Krizek, H. Ohno, and L. Smejkal, Altermag- netic spintronics, arXiv:2508.09748

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv