The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2607.06338 · v1 · pith:TA6TZGYU · submitted 2026-07-07 · astro-ph.HE

SN 2022erq: A Superluminous Thermonuclear Supernova with Escalating Pre-Explosion Mass Loss

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-07-08 09:18 UTCglm-5.2pith:TA6TZGYUrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification astro-ph.HE PACS 97.60.Bw98.38.Mz
keywords supernovaeType Iacircumstellar materialmass lossshock interactionprogenitor systemsSN 2022erqIa-CSM
0
0 comments X

The pith

Thermonuclear supernova's extreme luminosity traced to escalating pre-explosion mass loss

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents SN 2022erq, a superluminous thermonuclear supernova whose peak luminosity of roughly 8 × 10^43 erg/s — nearly ten times that of a typical Type Ia supernova — is overwhelmingly powered by the collision of supernova ejecta with a massive surrounding shell of circumstellar material (CSM), rather than by radioactive decay of nickel. The authors combine Hα emission-line diagnostics with bolometric light-curve modeling to reconstruct the progenitor's mass-loss history over the final decades before explosion. They find that the mass-loss rate escalated by roughly an order of magnitude, rising from about 0.04 to about 0.6 solar masses per year, producing a CSM shell of roughly 3 solar masses extending to about 3.5 × 10^16 cm. The spectroscopic phenotype — iron-group element dominance with weak intermediate-mass element lines — points to an underlying thermonuclear explosion from highly efficient nuclear burning, broadly similar to overluminous SNe Ia such as SN 1991T. The presence of hydrogen in the CSM, the young stellar environment (~100 Myr), and the extreme mass-loss rate together favor a progenitor system consisting of a near-Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarf and an intermediate-mass nondegenerate companion that underwent a brief, violent phase of mass loss immediately before explosion. The paper argues that the observed diversity among superluminous thermonuclear transients is primarily governed by the presence and properties of CSM, which can dominate the observed energetics even when the underlying explosion itself produces a substantial mass of iron-group elements.

Core claim

The central discovery is that SN 2022erq's extraordinary luminosity is not a product of an exotic explosion mechanism or an implausibly large nickel mass (which would require ~6 solar masses of 56Ni), but rather the efficient conversion of shock kinetic energy into radiation as supernova ejecta collide with a dense, massive, hydrogen-rich CSM shell. By inverting the bolometric luminosity equation L = 2π ε ρ_CSM r²_sh v³_sh — where ε ≈ 50% is the kinetic-to-radiative conversion efficiency — the authors derive a CSM density profile ρ_CSM ∝ r^{-3.66}, significantly steeper than the r^{-2} expected from a steady wind. This steepening directly encodes the escalating mass-loss history: the progen系

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the conversion of ejecta kinetic energy into radiation through interaction with circumstellar material (CSM). The paper inverts the shock-powered luminosity equation L = 2π ε ρ_CSM r²_sh v³_sh to recover the CSM density profile from the observed bolometric light curve, and independently constrains the outer CSM from narrow Hα emission. The steepness of the recovered density profile (ρ ∝ r^{-3.66}) relative to a steady-wind profile (ρ ∝ r^{-2}) is the signature of escalating mass loss.

If this is right

  • If CSM interaction can boost a thermonuclear supernova's luminosity by an order of magnitude, some events classified as 'super-Chandrasekhar' based on luminosity alone may in fact be ordinary Chandrasekhar-mass explosions surrounded by dense CSM, with implications for supernova cosmology and dark-energy measurements.
  • The reconstructed mass-loss escalation (0.04 to 0.6 solar masses per year over decades) places strong constraints on binary evolution channels, potentially requiring violent late-stage mass-transfer episodes that are not predicted by standard single-degenerate models.
  • The technique of combining Hα diagnostics (tracing outer, earlier CSM) with bolometric light-curve inversion (tracing inner, later CSM) provides a generalizable method for reconstructing pre-explosion mass-loss histories in other interacting supernovae.
  • If the CSM conversion efficiency ε varies with time or differs from the assumed ~50%, the inferred CSM density profile and mass-loss history would change, making time-dependent efficiency modeling a priority for future work.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If escalating mass loss is a generic feature of single-degenerate progenitor systems approaching explosion, the fraction of SNe Ia showing CSM interaction could serve as a diagnostic of the binary evolution channel, potentially distinguishing single-degenerate from double-degenerate populations statistically.
  • The ~3 solar mass CSM shell is at the upper boundary of what existing binary evolution models can produce, suggesting either an as-yet-unmodeled ejection mechanism or that CSM masses in Ia-CSM events may have been systematically underestimated.
  • If some super-Chandrasekhar candidates are actually Chandrasekhar-mass events with CSM interaction, the inferred nickel masses and ejecta masses for those events would need downward revision, affecting the luminosity calibration used in cosmological distance measurements.

Load-bearing premise

The entire mass-loss history reconstruction depends on a CDS (cold dense shell) velocity law derived from only two Hα FWHM measurements (at 77 and 147 days post-explosion), extrapolated as a power law across the full 40–330 day interaction phase. If the shock velocity deviated from this power law, or if the conversion efficiency ε was not constant at ~50%, the inferred CSM density profile and mass-loss rates would change substantially.

What would settle it

A time-resolved measurement of CDS velocity across the full interaction phase that deviates significantly from v_sh ∝ t^0.15 would invalidate the derived CSM density profile and the reconstructed mass-loss history.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06338 by \'Ad\'am S\'odor, \'Agoston Horti-D\'avid, Alexei V. Filippenko, Andr\'as P\'al, A. Pastorello, A. Reguitti, Attila B\'odi, B\'alint Seli, Borb\'ala Cseh, Bo Wang, Chengyuan Wu, C. P. Guti\'errez, Csilla Kalup, D.-D Shi, E. Kankare, Fangzhou Guo, Gaici Li, G. Valerin, I. Salmaso, J. Craig Wheeler, Jialian Liu, Jianrong Shi, Jose L. Prieto, J\'ozsef Vink\'o, Jujia Zhang, J.-W. Zhao, Levente Kriskovics, Liping Li, M. D. Stritzinger, N. Elias Rosa, Peter Lundqvist, Qian Zhai, R\'eka K\"onyves-T\'oth, R\'obert Szak\'ats, Shengyu Yan, S. Moran, S. Williams, Tengfei Song, Thomas G. Brink, Weikang Zheng, Weili Lin, Xiangcun Meng, Xiaofeng Wang, Yi Yang, Yongyuan Xiang, Yongzhi Cai, Yunkun Han, Zeyi Zhao, Z.-H. Peng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Optical and NIR light curves of SN 2022erq. Dotted and dashed vertical lines mark the explosion epoch and the time of B- band maximum, respectively. The data presented in this work are supplemented with public photometry from ZTF and ATLAS. The early-time rise in the gri- bands is fitted with a power-law (fireball) model. In this work, we present SN 2022erq, a superlumi￾nous (Mr ≈ −21 mag) thermonuclear tr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spectral sequence of SN 2022erq. Epochs marked on the right side of each spectrum are relative to the adopted explosion date. Dashed and dotted lines mark the rest-frame wavelengths of features originating from the SN and the host galaxy, with identifications labeled above and below the spec￾trum, respectively. All spectra have been corrected for the host redshift and smoothed with bin sizes chosen accordi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The B-, g-, and r/R-band light curves of SN 2022erq compared with representative events: SNe Ia-CSM (SNe 2005gj, 2018evt; G. Aldering et al. 2006; J. L. Prieto et al. 2007; Y. Yang et al. 2023; L. Wang et al. 2024), SC candidates (SNe 2007if, 2009dc; R. A. Scalzo et al. 2010; S. Taubenberger et al. 2011; M. Hicken et al. 2012; J. M. Silverman et al. 2012; B. E. Stahl et al. 2019), 91T-like SNe (SNe 1991T, … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Peak r/R-band luminosity (M r/R max ) vs. duration above half-maximum luminosity (T1/2) in the rest frame. The sample includes normal, 91T-like, SC candidate, and CSM-interaction SNe Ia from J. M. Silverman et al. (2013); Y. Sharma et al. (2023). emission from the shocked CSM, e.g., Hα emission, (Y. Sharma et al. 2023) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spectral comparison of SN 2022erq near max￾imum brightness with SNe Ia-CSM (SNe 2002ic, 2005gj, 2018evt), SC candidates (SNe 2007if, 2009dc), 91T-like (SNe 1991T, 2011hr), normal SN Ia SN 2011fe (J. T. Parrent et al. 2012), and SN IIn SN 2010jl (N. Smith et al. 2012). Thin dotted lines mark rest-frame wavelengths; thick lines indi￾cate features at a blueshift of 10,000 km s−1 . All spectra are dereddened. … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spectral comparison of SN 2022erq with SNe 1991T, 2007if, and 2011hr. Luminosity scaling factors, where applied, are noted after the phase. Thin dotted lines indicate the rest-frame wavelengths of spectral lines, while thick lines show their positions at a blueshift of 10,000 km s−1 . 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 Rest-Frame Wavelength (Å) Log(L λ) + o ffset 22erq(31d) 22erq(36d) 22erq(64d) 22erq(71d) 22er… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: SN 2022erq compared with SN Ia-CSM SNe 2002ic, 2005gj, and 2018evt, following the same matching procedure applied in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: A comparison of the pre-explosion host-galaxy photometric SED, the SED-derived model spectrum of the stellar population, and the late-time spectrum of SN 2022erq at τ ≈ 488 d (continuum-corrected to match the host SED). Dashed lines mark rest-frame wavelengths of spectral lines. the local environment. Applying the R23 index (H. A. Kobulnicky & L. J. Kewley 2004), defined as ([O ii] λ3727 + [O iii] λλ4959,… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Multi-Gaussian fits to the Hα and Paα lines of SN 2022erq. The spectra with higher spectral resolution and S/N were selected to enable a robust decomposition of the line profiles. The instrumental FWHM is ∼ 210 km s−1 for the optical spectra and ∼ 150 km s−1 for the NIR spectrum. 2000 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Velocity relative to He I 10830 (km s 1 ) N o r m a liz e d F + o ffs e t 13d 35d 88d 103d… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Spectral features normalized and displayed in the velocity space at selected phases. The left panel shows the He I λ10, 830 and Paγ lines, while the right panel presents the Paα line. Vertical lines indicate velocities of 0 km s−1 (dashed) and −180 km s−1 (dash-dotted) relative to host galaxy. and Ca ii absorption. The prominent discrepancy lies in the strong gas emission lines (e.g., from O, S, N) presen… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: shows the bolometric light curve of SN 2022erq, derived from blackbody fits to the observed SED spanning the u–K bands. Light curves in individ￾ual filters were interpolated onto a common time grid, and blackbody fits were performed only when at least four filters had detections; no extrapolation was applied to epochs with missing bands. The figure also shows quasi-bolometric luminosities from direct flux… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: CSM density profile of SN 2022erq. Red stars show densities inferred from the bolometric light curve, with a power-law fit ρCSM ∝ r −s (black line). Black diamonds mark independent density estimates from the narrow Hα line flux. Coloured dash/dotted curves show steady-wind profiles ρ = M /˙ (4πr2 vwind) for different mass-loss rates, as￾suming a constant wind velocity vwind = 180 km s−1 . The top axis giv… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a photometric and spectroscopic study of the superluminous Type Ia supernova SN 2022erq. Its early spectra, dominated by iron-group elements with weak intermediate-mass features, might indicate highly efficient nuclear burning, broadly similar to that inferred for some overluminous SNe Ia. The rapid emergence and persistence of narrow Balmer emission lines superposed on this iron-rich spectrum provide clear evidence of long-lived interaction with a hydrogen-rich circumstellar medium (CSM), establishing SN 2022erq as a member of the rare Ia-CSM class. SN 2022erq reached a peak bolometric luminosity of about 8 x 10^43 erg/s and exhibited an exceptionally slow post-peak decline, indicating that its light curve is dominated by long-duration ejecta-CSM interaction. By combining H-alpha diagnostics with bolometric light-curve modeling, we reconstruct the pre-explosion mass-loss history of the progenitor. The mass-loss rate escalated by one order of magnitude over the final decades, rising from about 0.04 to about 0.6 solar masses per year. This surge produced a massive, extended CSM shell of about 3 solar masses out to about 3.5 x 10^16 cm. The young stellar environment (about 100 Myr) together with this substantial, extensive CSM points to a progenitor system consisting of a white dwarf and an intermediate-mass companion that underwent increasing mass loss prior to explosion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper presents a comprehensive photometric and spectroscopic study of SN 2022erq, a superluminous Type Ia supernova with circumstellar interaction (Ia-CSM). The authors argue that the extraordinary peak bolometric luminosity (~8 x 10^43 erg/s) is powered by ejecta-CSM shock interaction rather than radioactive decay, based on the implausibility of the implied ~6 solar mass nickel yield and the persistent narrow H-alpha emission. They reconstruct the pre-explosion mass-loss history by inverting the bolometric luminosity equation to derive the CSM density profile, finding that the mass-loss rate escalated from ~0.04 to ~0.6 solar masses per year over the final decades. The paper combines H-alpha diagnostics, bolometric light-curve modeling, and host-galaxy environment analysis to constrain the progenitor system. The dataset is extensive, with early spectroscopic coverage (within 2 days of explosion) and long-term monitoring to ~1350 days.

Significance. The paper provides a valuable dataset on a rare class of transients (Ia-CSM), with the earliest spectroscopic confirmation of an Ia-CSM event to date. The combined H-alpha and bolometric analysis approach, including the independent cross-check of the CSM density slope via the Moriya et al. (2013) analytic relation, is methodologically sound and represents a useful contribution. The reconstruction of a time-variable mass-loss history, while subject to significant uncertainties acknowledged by the authors, provides falsifiable quantitative predictions that can be tested against future Ia-CSM events and progenitor models.

major comments (2)
  1. §5.3, Eq. (2) and surrounding text: The CDS velocity law v_sh(t) = 2800 * t_d^0.15 km/s is calibrated to only two FWHM measurements (5400 km/s at 77d, 5900 km/s at 147d) but is extrapolated across the full 40-330 day interaction phase. Since rho_CSM is proportional to L/(v_sh^3 * r_sh^2) and r_sh = integral of v_sh dt, errors in v_sh propagate nonlinearly into both the density normalization and the radial mapping (hence the mass-loss timeline). The paper should explicitly quantify how uncertainties in the velocity law (e.g., from alternative power-law indices or functional forms consistent with the two data points) affect the derived absolute mass-loss rates and total CSM mass. Without this, the quantitative mass-loss reconstruction (0.04 to 0.6 M_sun/yr, ~3 M_sun CSM) lacks defensible error bars on its load-bearing inputs.
  2. §5.3: The radiative conversion efficiency epsilon ~ 50% is derived as a global ratio E_rad/E_kin assuming M_ej = 1.4 M_sun and v = 10^4 km/s. However, epsilon is then used as a constant in Eq. (2) to invert for rho_CSM at each epoch. If epsilon varies with time (e.g., due to changing optical depth or shock geometry), the shape of the density profile is distorted, not just rescaled. The paper should discuss whether time-varying epsilon is physically plausible for this system and, at minimum, state whether the density slope (s = 3.66) or the absolute normalization is more sensitive to this assumption. The Moriya et al. (2013) check validates the slope independently, but the absolute mass-loss rates depend on the normalization set by epsilon.
minor comments (7)
  1. §5.2: The H-alpha-based mass-loss rate of ~0.04 M_sun/yr is derived from two epochs (19d and 77d) and assumes a wind-density profile. It would help to state explicitly that this is an average over the outer CSM and does not capture the time variability inferred from the bolometric method.
  2. Figure 14: The density estimates from H-alpha (black diamonds) and from bolometric inversion (red stars) are described as 'broadly consistent,' but the H-alpha points probe the outer CSM while the bolometric points probe the inner region. The figure would benefit from clearer labeling of which radial regions each method constrains, to make the complementarity rather than direct overlap more apparent.
  3. §5.1: The SED-derived stellar metallicity (log(Z/Z_sun) = -2.13, ~0.7% solar) is described as typical of low-metallicity galaxies, but this seems extremely low even for a dwarf galaxy. The gas-phase metallicity (12 + log(O/H) = 8.45, ~58% solar) is more moderate. The large discrepancy between these two estimates deserves more discussion, as it may reflect SED fitting degeneracies rather than a genuine physical difference.
  4. §4.1: The statement that early H-alpha and H-beta emission 'originate from SN-CSM interaction rather than galactic contamination' is based on the relative weakness of other galactic emission lines. This argument is reasonable but should note that the early spectra have limited spectral resolution (FWHM ~ 700-1000 km/s), so a quantitative limit on any residual galactic H-alpha contribution would strengthen the conclusion.
  5. Table 2: The B-band comparison includes SN 2010jl (a Type IIn SN), which is not a thermonuclear event. While the comparison is useful for context, a footnote clarifying that SN 2010jl is included solely as a photometric benchmark (not a thermonuclear analog) would avoid confusion.
  6. §3.2: The text mentions that the u-band contribution to the total luminosity is negligible for t > 40 d, but the bolometric light curve in Figure 13 appears to use blackbody fits. It would help to state whether the blackbody temperature and radius evolution show any anomalies at epochs where the u-band data are missing.
  7. The paper uses both tau (days since explosion) and t (days since B-band maximum) as phase indicators. While defined in §2.2, the dual usage can be confusing when cross-referencing figures and text. A unified phase convention, or a more prominent reminder, would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report, and for recognizing the value of the dataset and methodology. Both major comments concern the systematic uncertainties in the CSM density reconstruction (§5.3). We agree that these deserve more explicit treatment and will revise the manuscript accordingly. Below we address each comment in turn.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: §5.3, Eq. (2): The CDS velocity law v_sh(t) = 2800 * t_d^0.15 km/s is calibrated to only two FWHM measurements (5400 km/s at 77d, 5900 km/s at 147d) but is extrapolated across the full 40–330 day interaction phase. Since rho_CSM is proportional to L/(v_sh^3 * r_sh^2) and r_sh = integral of v_sh dt, errors in v_sh propagate nonlinearly into both the density normalization and the radial mapping (hence the mass-loss timeline). The paper should explicitly quantify how uncertainties in the velocity law affect the derived absolute mass-loss rates and total CSM mass.

    Authors: We agree that the velocity law is a load-bearing input calibrated to only two direct measurements, and that the manuscript should be more transparent about the resulting uncertainties. We will add a dedicated discussion in §5.3 quantifying the sensitivity of the derived CSM properties to the assumed velocity law. Specifically, we will present the results of repeating the density inversion with: (i) a constant velocity v_sh = 5600 km/s (the mean of the two measurements), (ii) alternative power-law indices bracketing the range consistent with the two data points within their measurement uncertainties (the FWHM values carry ~10% uncertainty from the multi-Gaussian decomposition), and (iii) a steeper power-law to test the effect of stronger deceleration. Because v_sh enters as v_sh^3 in the density and as the integrand for r_sh, the dominant effect is on the absolute normalization of rho_CSM (and hence the mass-loss rates), while the radial mapping is less sensitive given the shallow index (0.15). We will show that the density slope s changes by <0.2 across these alternatives, consistent with the independent Moriya et al. (2013) check (s = 3.59 vs. 3.66), and that the total CSM mass varies by approximately ±30–40%. The absolute mass-loss rates (0.04–0.6 M_sun/yr) carry comparable fractional uncertainties. We will state these ranges explicitly in the revised text and add a note that the two-point calibration is a limitation inherent to the available spectroscopic resolution. revision_made = 'yes' revision: yes

  2. Referee: §5.3: The radiative conversion efficiency epsilon ~ 50% is derived as a global ratio E_rad/E_kin assuming M_ej = 1.4 M_sun and v = 10^4 km/s. However, epsilon is then used as a constant in Eq. (2) to invert for rho_CSM at each epoch. If epsilon varies with time (e.g., due to changing optical depth or shock geometry), the shape of the density profile is distorted, not just rescaled. The paper should discuss whether time-varying epsilon is physically plausible for this system and, at a minimum, state whether the density slope (s = 3.66) or the absolute normalization is more sensitive to this assumption.

    Authors: This is a well-taken point. We will add a paragraph in §5.3 discussing the assumption of constant epsilon. Physically, time-varying epsilon is plausible: the optical depth of the CSM, the shock geometry, and the fraction of the shock surface that is radiative can all evolve as the shock propagates outward through a density gradient. However, we can make two statements that bound the impact. First, the density slope s is largely insensitive to epsilon: the Moriya et al. (2013) analytic relation between the light-curve decline rate (alpha = -1.46) and s does not involve epsilon at all, and it yields s = 3.59, in close agreement with the numerical value of 3.66 obtained with constant epsilon. This agreement suggests that any time variation of epsilon over the interaction phase is either modest or approximately degenerate with the density slope in a way that does not significantly distort the profile shape. Second, the absolute normalization of rho_CSM (and hence the mass-loss rates and total CSM mass) scales linearly with epsilon, so a factor-of-two variation in epsilon would rescale the mass-loss rates by the same factor. We will state explicitly that the density slope is robust to the epsilon assumption, while the absolute normalization carries a systematic uncertainty comparable to the fractional variation of epsilon, which we cannot independently constrain. We will also note that epsilon ~ 50% is already at the high end of physically expected values, which limits the plausible range of variation. revision_made = 'yes' revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the bolometric density inversion is a legitimate forward inversion, not a tautology. The only concern is a minor parameter-fitting dependency in the CDS velocity law.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation in Section 5.3 inverts the standard shock interaction luminosity equation (Eq. 2: L = 2π ε ρ_CSM r²_sh v³_sh) to solve for the CSM density ρ_CSM(r) as a function of the observed bolometric luminosity L(t). This is a standard physical inversion, not a circular definition: the luminosity is an independent observational input, and the density is the unknown output. The key inputs (ε ≈ 0.5, v_sh(t) = 2800 t_d^0.15 km/s) are calibrated from independent quantities (the ratio of total radiated to kinetic energy, and Hα FWHM measurements at two epochs, respectively). While the two-point CDS velocity law is a significant modeling assumption (a correctness risk, not circularity), it is not defined in terms of the output density. The mass-loss rates are then computed from the density assuming a steady-wind profile and a wind velocity (180 km/s) derived independently from the Hα P-Cygni absorption. The paper provides an important independent cross-check: the Moriya et al. (2013) analytic relation yields a density slope s = 3.59 from the light-curve decline rate α = -1.46, consistent with the numerical s = 3.66. This validates the density profile shape without using the fitted v_sh or ε. The Hα-based density estimates provide a further independent cross-check for the outer CSM. No self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central physical result. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks and observational inputs. The score of 2 reflects the minor concern that the CDS velocity parameterization is fit from a small subset of data and then used to derive the density normalization, but this is a standard modeling assumption, not a circularity where the prediction is forced by the fit by construction (the density is not the fitted quantity).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or entities. The free parameters are standard in CSM interaction modeling but are underconstrained (epsilon assumed, v_1 from two points). The axioms are domain assumptions standard in the literature but each represents a simplification (constant epsilon, constant wind velocity, single-zone CDS velocity).

free parameters (4)
  • epsilon (radiative conversion efficiency) = 0.5
    Assumed constant at 50% based on the ratio of total radiated energy to total shock kinetic energy; not independently constrained.
  • v_1 (CDS velocity normalization) = 2800 km/s
    Parameterized from two H-alpha FWHM measurements at 77d and 147d to define v_sh(t) = v_1 * t_d^0.15.
  • v_wind (CSM wind velocity) = 180 km/s
    Derived from the P-Cygni absorption minimum in H-alpha at 77d; assumed constant for all mass-loss rate calculations.
  • n (ejecta power-law index) = 10
    Assumed canonical value for SN Ia ejecta (Matzner & McKee 1999) used in the analytic light-curve slope relation.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The narrow H-alpha emission arises from unshocked, photoionized CSM ahead of the forward shock and traces the outer CSM density via the Ofek et al. (2013) relation.
    Section 5.2: This assumption underlies the mass-loss rate derivation from H-alpha luminosity.
  • domain assumption The bolometric luminosity is dominated by shock interaction energy converted to radiation with a single time-independent efficiency epsilon.
    Section 5.3, Eq. 2: The CSM density inversion assumes L = epsilon * dE_kin/dt with constant epsilon.
  • domain assumption The CDS velocity measured from the broad H-alpha component traces the forward shock velocity.
    Section 5.3: v_sh is identified with the FWHM of the broad H-alpha component and used to compute the shock radius.
  • domain assumption The CSM was formed by a steady wind with constant velocity v_wind = 180 km/s.
    Section 5.2-5.3: Used to convert CSM density to mass-loss rate and to compute timescales.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 45254 in / 2486 out tokens · 448417 ms · 2026-07-08T09:18:56.398764+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 111 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2006, title Nearby Supernova Factory Observations of SN 2005gj: Another Type Ia Supernova in a Massive Circumstellar Envelope , , 650, 510, 10.1086/507020

    Aldering , G., Antilogus , P., Bailey , S., et al. 2006, title Nearby Supernova Factory Observations of SN 2005gj: Another Type Ia Supernova in a Massive Circumstellar Envelope , , 650, 510, 10.1086/507020

  2. [2]

    A., Kasen , D., et al

    Arcavi , I., Howell , D. A., Kasen , D., et al. 2017, title Energetic eruptions leading to a peculiar hydrogen-rich explosion of a massive star , , 551, 210, 10.1038/nature24030

  3. [3]

    Arnett , W. D. 1982, title Type I supernovae. I - Analytic solutions for the early part of the light curve , , 253, 785, 10.1086/159681

  4. [4]

    J., & Scott , P

    Asplund , M., Grevesse , N., Sauval , A. J., & Scott , P. 2009, title The Chemical Composition of the Sun , Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 47, 481, 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

  5. [5]

    C., Kulkarni , S

    Bellm , E. C., Kulkarni , S. R., Graham , M. J., et al. 2019, title The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results , , 131, 018002, 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

  6. [6]

    Blondin , S., Dessart , L., & Hillier , D. J. 2015, title A one-dimensional Chandrasekhar-mass delayed-detonation model for the broad-lined Type Ia supernova 2002bo , , 448, 2766, 10.1093/mnras/stv188

  7. [7]

    Blondin , S., Dessart , L., & Hillier , D. J. 2018, title The detonation of a sub-Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarf at the origin of the low-luminosity Type Ia supernova 1999by , , 474, 3931, 10.1093/mnras/stx3058

  8. [8]

    S., Kasen , D., Shen , K

    Bloom , J. S., Kasen , D., Shen , K. J., et al. 2012, title A Compact Degenerate Primary-star Progenitor of SN 2011fe , , 744, L17, 10.1088/2041-8205/744/2/L17

  9. [9]

    J., Huang , C., Chevalier , R

    Borish , H. J., Huang , C., Chevalier , R. A., et al. 2015, title Near-infrared Spectroscopy of the Type IIn SN 2010jl: Evidence for High Velocity Ejecta , , 801, 7, 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/7

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, title Stellar Population Synthesis at the Resolution of 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 344, 1000, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

  11. [11]

    , Conroy, C., & Johnson, B

    Byler, N., Dalcanton, J. ., Conroy, C., & Johnson, B. . 2017, title Nebular Continuum and Line Emission in Stellar Population Synthesis Models , apj, 840, 44, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c66

  12. [12]

    , et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. ., et al. 2000, title The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies , apj, 533, 682, 10.1086/308692

  13. [13]

    A., & Fransson , C

    Chevalier , R. A., & Fransson , C. 1994, title Emission from Circumstellar Interaction in Normal Type II Supernovae , , 420, 268, 10.1086/173557

  14. [14]

    2011, title Keck Observations of the Young Metal-poor Host Galaxy of the Super-Chandrasekhar-mass Type Ia Supernova SN 2007if , , 733, 3, 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/3

    Childress , M., Aldering , G., Aragon , C., et al. 2011, title Keck Observations of the Young Metal-poor Host Galaxy of the Super-Chandrasekhar-mass Type Ia Supernova SN 2007if , , 733, 3, 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/3

  15. [15]

    J., Scalzo , R

    Childress , M. J., Scalzo , R. A., Sim , S. A., et al. 2013, title Spectroscopic Observations of SN 2012fr: A Luminous, Normal Type Ia Supernova with Early High-velocity Features and a Late Velocity Plateau , , 770, 29, 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/29

  16. [16]

    Chugai , N. N. 2001, title Broad emission lines from the opaque electron-scattering environment of SN 1998S , , 326, 1448, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2001.04717.x

  17. [17]

    J., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08310.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.355..147F 355, 147

    Chugai , N. N., Chevalier , R. A., & Lundqvist , P. 2004, title Circumstellar interaction of the type Ia supernova 2002ic , , 355, 627, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08347.x

  18. [18]

    N., & Yungelson , L

    Chugai , N. N., & Yungelson , L. R. 2004, title Type-Ia Supernovae in Dense Circumstellar Gas , Astronomy Letters, 30, 65, 10.1134/1.1646691

  19. [19]

    S., Ohyama , Y., et al

    Deng , J., Kawabata , K. S., Ohyama , Y., et al. 2004, title Subaru Spectroscopy of the Interacting Type Ia Supernova SN 2002ic: Evidence of a Hydrogen-rich, Asymmetric Circumstellar Medium , , 605, L37, 10.1086/420698

  20. [20]

    2015, title Rapid instrument exchanging system for the Cassegrain focus of the Lijiang 2.4-m Telescope , RAA, 15, 918, 10.1088/1674-4527/15/6/014

    Fan , Y.-F., Bai , J.-M., Zhang , J.-J., et al. 2015, title Rapid instrument exchanging system for the Cassegrain focus of the Lijiang 2.4-m Telescope , RAA, 15, 918, 10.1088/1674-4527/15/6/014

  21. [21]

    Filippenko , A. V. 1982, title The importance of atmospheric differential refraction in spectrophotometry. , , 94, 715, 10.1086/131052

  22. [22]

    V., Richmond , M

    Filippenko , A. V., Richmond , M. W., Matheson , T., et al. 1992, title The Peculiar Type IA SN 1991T: Detonation of a White Dwarf? , , 384, L15, 10.1086/186252

  23. [23]

    E., Sullivan , M., Gal-Yam , A., et al

    Firth , R. E., Sullivan , M., Gal-Yam , A., et al. 2015, title The rising light curves of Type Ia supernovae , , 446, 3895, 10.1093/mnras/stu2314

  24. [24]

    J., et al

    Fransson , C., Ergon , M., Challis , P. J., et al. 2014, title High-density Circumstellar Interaction in the Luminous Type IIn SN 2010jl: The First 1100 Days , , 797, 118, 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/118

  25. [25]

    J., Kulkarni , S

    Graham , M. J., Kulkarni , S. R., Bellm , E. C., et al. 2019, title The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives , , 131, 078001, 10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c

  26. [26]

    1999, title A Wide Symbiotic Channel to Type IA Supernovae , , 522, 487, 10.1086/307608

    Hachisu , I., Kato , M., & Nomoto , K. 1999, title A Wide Symbiotic Channel to Type IA Supernovae , , 522, 487, 10.1086/307608

  27. [27]

    M., Suntzeff , N

    Hamuy , M., Phillips , M. M., Suntzeff , N. B., et al. 2003, title An asymptotic-giant-branch star in the progenitor system of a type Ia supernova , , 424, 651, 10.1038/nature01854

  28. [28]

    Z., Bai , J.-M., & Han , Z

    Han , Y., Fan , L., Zheng , X. Z., Bai , J.-M., & Han , Z. 2023, title BayeSED-GALAXIES. I. Performance Test for Simultaneous Photometric Redshift and Stellar Population Parameter Estimation of Galaxies in the CSST Wide-field Multiband Imaging Survey , , 269, 39, 10.3847/1538-4365/acfc3a

  29. [29]

    J., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08310.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.355..147F 355, 147

    Han , Z., & Podsiadlowski , P. 2004, title The single-degenerate channel for the progenitors of Type Ia supernovae , , 350, 1301, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07713.x

  30. [30]

    L., & Bonnell, I

    Han , Z., & Podsiadlowski , P. 2006, title A single-degenerate model for the progenitor of the Type Ia supernova 2002ic , , 368, 1095, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10185.x

  31. [31]

    M., Prieto , J

    Hicken , M., Garnavich , P. M., Prieto , J. L., et al. 2007, title The Luminous and Carbon-rich Supernova 2006gz: A Double Degenerate Merger? , , 669, L17, 10.1086/523301

  32. [32]

    P., et al

    Hicken , M., Challis , P., Kirshner , R. P., et al. 2012, title CfA4: Light Curves for 94 Type Ia Supernovae , , 200, 12, 10.1088/0067-0049/200/2/12

  33. [33]

    A., & R \"o pke , F

    Hillebrandt , W., Sim , S. A., & R \"o pke , F. K. 2007, title Off-center explosions of Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarfs: an explanation of super-bright type Ia supernovae? , , 465, L17, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077100

  34. [34]

    Howell , D. A. 2011, title Type Ia supernovae as stellar endpoints and cosmological tools , Nature Communications, 2, 350, 10.1038/ncomms1344

  35. [35]

    A., Sullivan , M., Nugent , P

    Howell , D. A., Sullivan , M., Nugent , P. E., et al. 2006, title The type Ia supernova SNLS-03D3bb from a super-Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarf star , , 443, 308, 10.1038/nature05103

  36. [36]

    Y., Conley , A., Howell , D

    Hsiao , E. Y., Conley , A., Howell , D. A., et al. 2007, title K-Corrections and Spectral Templates of Type Ia Supernovae , , 663, 1187, 10.1086/518232

  37. [37]

    2022, title Spectroscopic Studies of Type Ia Supernovae Using LSTM Neural Networks , , 930, 70, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5c48

    Hu , L., Chen , X., & Wang , L. 2022, title Spectroscopic Studies of Type Ia Supernovae Using LSTM Neural Networks , , 930, 70, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5c48

  38. [38]

    2010, title Seeing the Collision of a Supernova with Its Companion Star , , 708, 1025, 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1025

    Kasen , D. 2010, title Seeing the Collision of a Supernova with Its Companion Star , , 708, 1025, 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1025

  39. [39]

    R., Chennamangalam J., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19498.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.418..477B 418, 477

    Kashi , A., & Soker , N. 2011, title A circumbinary disc in the final stages of common envelope and the core-degenerate scenario for Type Ia supernovae , , 417, 1466, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19361.x

  40. [40]

    A., & Kewley , L

    Kobulnicky , H. A., & Kewley , L. J. 2004, title Metallicities of 0.3<z<1.0 Galaxies in the GOODS-North Field , , 617, 240, 10.1086/425299

  41. [41]

    Landolt , A. U. 1992, title UBVRI Photometric Standard Stars in the Magnitude Range 11.5 < V < 16.0 Around the Celestial Equator , , 104, 340, 10.1086/116242

  42. [42]

    S., Hill , G

    Lee , H., Chonis , T. S., Hill , G. J., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean , S. K. Ramsay , & H. Takami , 77357H, 10.1117/12.857201

  43. [43]

    Leonard , D. C. 2007, title Constraining the Type Ia Supernova Progenitor: The Search for Hydrogen in Nebular Spectra , , 670, 1275, 10.1086/522367

  44. [44]

    2022, title LiONS Transient Classification Report for 2022-03-13 , Transient Name Server Classification Report, 2022-701, 1

    Li , L., Zhai , Q., Zhang , J., & Wang , X. 2022, title LiONS Transient Classification Report for 2022-03-13 , Transient Name Server Classification Report, 2022-701, 1

  45. [45]

    2018, title The double-degenerate model for the progenitors of Type Ia supernovae , , 473, 5352, 10.1093/mnras/stx2756

    Liu , D., Wang , B., & Han , Z. 2018, title The double-degenerate model for the progenitors of Type Ia supernovae , , 473, 5352, 10.1093/mnras/stx2756

  46. [46]

    2009, title Subaru and Keck Observations of the Peculiar Type Ia Supernova 2006GZ at Late Phases , , 690, 1745, 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1745

    Maeda , K., Kawabata , K., Li , W., et al. 2009, title Subaru and Keck Observations of the Peculiar Type Ia Supernova 2006GZ at Late Phases , , 690, 1745, 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1745

  47. [47]

    A., Schlafly , E

    Magnier , E. A., Schlafly , E. F., Finkbeiner , D. P., et al. 2020, title Pan-STARRS Photometric and Astrometric Calibration , , 251, 6, 10.3847/1538-4365/abb82a

  48. [48]

    2014, title Observational Clues to the Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae , , 52, 107, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141031

    Maoz , D., Mannucci , F., & Nelemans , G. 2014, title Observational Clues to the Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae , , 52, 107, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141031

  49. [49]

    D., & McKee, C

    Matzner, C. D., & McKee, C. F. 1999, title The Expulsion of Stellar Envelopes in Core-Collapse Supernovae, The Astrophysical Journal, 510, 379, 10.1086/306571

  50. [50]

    2018, title Do SN 2002cx-like and SN Ia-CSM Objects Share the Same Origin? , , 861, 127, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac81f

    Meng , X., & Podsiadlowski , P. 2018, title Do SN 2002cx-like and SN Ia-CSM Objects Share the Same Origin? , , 861, 127, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac81f

  51. [51]

    2009, title WD+MS Systems as Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae with Different Metallicities , , 61, 1251, 10.1093/pasj/61.6.1251

    Meng , X., Yang , W., & Geng , X. 2009, title WD+MS Systems as Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae with Different Metallicities , , 61, 1251, 10.1093/pasj/61.6.1251

  52. [52]

    1994, title Lick Obs, , Tech

    Miller, J., & Stone, R. 1994, title Lick Obs, , Tech. rep., Tech. Rep. 66. Lick Obs., Santa Cruz

  53. [53]

    J., Maeda , K., Taddia , F., et al

    Moriya , T. J., Maeda , K., Taddia , F., et al. 2013, title An analytic bolometric light curve model of interaction-powered supernovae and its application to Type IIn supernovae , , 435, 1520, 10.1093/mnras/stt1392

  54. [54]

    2013, title BVRI lightcurves of supernovae SN 2011fe in M101, SN 2012aw in M95, and SN 2012cg in NGC 4424 , , 20, 30, 10.1016/j.newast.2012.09.003

    Munari , U., Henden , A., Belligoli , R., et al. 2013, title BVRI lightcurves of supernovae SN 2011fe in M101, SN 2012aw in M95, and SN 2012cg in NGC 4424 , , 20, 30, 10.1016/j.newast.2012.09.003

  55. [55]

    2013, title Nucleosynthesis in Stars and the Chemical Enrichment of Galaxies , , 51, 457, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140956

    Nomoto , K., Kobayashi , C., & Tominaga , N. 2013, title Nucleosynthesis in Stars and the Chemical Enrichment of Galaxies , , 51, 457, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140956

  56. [56]

    E., Sullivan , M., Cenko , S

    Nugent , P. E., Sullivan , M., Cenko , S. B., et al. 2011, title Supernova SN 2011fe from an exploding carbon-oxygen white dwarf star , , 480, 344, 10.1038/nature10644

  57. [57]

    O., Lin , L., Kouveliotou , C., et al

    Ofek , E. O., Lin , L., Kouveliotou , C., et al. 2013, title SN 2009ip: Constraints on the Progenitor Mass-loss Rate , The Astrophysical Journal, 768, 47, 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/47

  58. [58]

    O., Sullivan , M., Shaviv , N

    Ofek , E. O., Sullivan , M., Shaviv , N. J., et al. 2014, title Precursors Prior to Type IIn Supernova Explosions are Common: Precursor Rates, Properties, and Correlations , , 789, 104, 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/104

  59. [59]

    2013, title Helium-ignited Violent Mergers as a Unified Model for Normal and Rapidly Declining Type Ia Supernovae , , 770, L8, 10.1088/2041-8205/770/1/L8

    Pakmor , R., Kromer , M., Taubenberger , S., & Springel , V. 2013, title Helium-ignited Violent Mergers as a Unified Model for Normal and Rapidly Declining Type Ia Supernovae , , 770, L8, 10.1088/2041-8205/770/1/L8

  60. [60]

    T., Howell , D

    Parrent , J. T., Howell , D. A., Friesen , B., et al. 2012, title Analysis of the Early-time Optical Spectra of SN 2011fe in M101 , , 752, L26, 10.1088/2041-8205/752/2/L26

  61. [61]

    2007, title Detection of Circumstellar Material in a Normal Type Ia Supernova , Science, 317, 924, 10.1126/science.1143005

    Patat , F., Chandra , P., Chevalier , R., et al. 2007, title Detection of Circumstellar Material in a Normal Type Ia Supernova , Science, 317, 924, 10.1126/science.1143005

  62. [62]

    1999, title Measurements of and from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae , , 517, 565, 10.1086/307221

    Perlmutter , S., Aldering , G., Goldhaber , G., et al. 1999, title Measurements of and from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae , , 517, 565, 10.1086/307221

  63. [63]

    Phillips , M. M. 1993, title The Absolute Magnitudes of Type IA Supernovae , , 413, L105, 10.1086/186970

  64. [64]

    M., Wells , L

    Phillips , M. M., Wells , L. A., Suntzeff , N. B., et al. 1992, title SN 1991T: Further Evidence of the Heterogeneous Nature of Type IA Supernovae , , 103, 1632, 10.1086/116177

  65. [65]

    M., Ashall , C., Brown , P

    Phillips , M. M., Ashall , C., Brown , P. J., et al. 2024, title 1991T-like Supernovae , , 273, 16, 10.3847/1538-4365/ad4f7e

  66. [66]

    A Study of the Type Ia/IIn Supernova 2005gj from X-ray to the Infrared: Paper I

    Prieto , J. L., Garnavich , P. M., Phillips , M. M., et al. 2007, title A Study of the Type Ia/IIn Supernova 2005gj from X-ray to the Infrared: Paper I , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:0706.4088, 10.48550/arXiv.0706.4088

  67. [67]

    G., Filippenko , A

    Riess , A. G., Filippenko , A. V., Challis , P., et al. 1998, title Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant , , 116, 1009, 10.1086/300499

  68. [68]

    G., Yuan , W., Macri , L

    Riess , A. G., Yuan , W., Macri , L. M., et al. 2022, title A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s ^ -1 Mpc ^ -1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team , , 934, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b

  69. [69]

    A., Pian , E., et al

    Sasdelli , M., Mazzali , P. A., Pian , E., et al. 2014, title Abundance stratification in Type Ia supernovae - IV. The luminous, peculiar SN 1991T , , 445, 711, 10.1093/mnras/stu1777

  70. [70]

    A., Aldering , G., Antilogus , P., et al

    Scalzo , R. A., Aldering , G., Antilogus , P., et al. 2010, title Nearby Supernova Factory Observations of SN 2007if: First Total Mass Measurement of a Super-Chandrasekhar-Mass Progenitor , , 713, 1073, 10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/1073

  71. [71]

    F., & Finkbeiner , D

    Schlafly , E. F., & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, title Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD , , 737, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

  72. [72]

    P., Kirshner , R

    Schmidt , B. P., Kirshner , R. P., Leibundgut , B., et al. 1994, title SN 1991T: Reflections of Past Glory , , 434, L19, 10.1086/187562

  73. [73]

    2023, title A Systematic Study of Ia-CSM Supernovae from the ZTF Bright Transient Survey , , 948, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/acbc16

    Sharma , Y., Sollerman , J., Fremling , C., et al. 2023, title A Systematic Study of Ia-CSM Supernovae from the ZTF Bright Transient Survey , , 948, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/acbc16

  74. [74]

    J., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17325.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.409..619K 409, 619

    Silverman , J. M., Ganeshalingam , M., Li , W., et al. 2011, title Fourteen months of observations of the possible super-Chandrasekhar mass Type Ia Supernova 2009dc , , 410, 585, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17474.x

  75. [75]

    MNRAS , author =

    Silverman , J. M., Foley , R. J., Filippenko , A. V., et al. 2012, title Berkeley Supernova Ia Program - I. Observations, data reduction and spectroscopic sample of 582 low-redshift Type Ia supernovae , , 425, 1789, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21270.x

  76. [76]

    M., Nugent , P

    Silverman , J. M., Nugent , P. E., Gal-Yam , A., et al. 2013, title Type Ia Supernovae Strongly Interacting with Their Circumstellar Medium , , 207, 3, 10.1088/0067-0049/207/1/3

  77. [77]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie , M. F., Cutri , R. M., Stiening , R., et al. 2006, title The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) , , 131, 1163, 10.1086/498708

  78. [78]

    W., Smartt , S

    Smith , K. W., Smartt , S. J., Young , D. R., et al. 2020, title Design and Operation of the ATLAS Transient Science Server , , 132, 085002, 10.1088/1538-3873/ab936e

  79. [79]

    2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed

    Smith , N. 2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed. A. W. Alsabti & P. Murdin , 403, 10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_38

  80. [80]

    M., Filippenko , A

    Smith , N., Silverman , J. M., Filippenko , A. V., et al. 2012, title Systematic Blueshift of Line Profiles in the Type IIn Supernova 2010jl: Evidence for Post-shock Dust Formation? , , 143, 17, 10.1088/0004-6256/143/1/17

Showing first 80 references.