Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 7 minor 54 references

Effect of charge-imbalance potential relaxation on the high-frequency vortex dynamics and kinetic inductance of superconducting circuits

T0 review · 1 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-08 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Charge imbalance gives vortices a memory, reshaping superconducting circuits

desk verdict Clean TDGL derivation of retarded vortex viscosity kernel (1−iωτ_E)⁻¹, limited to the l_E≪ξ regime where many experiments sit in the opposite limit read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06390 v1 pith:4FQFPPPJ submitted 2026-07-07 cond-mat.supr-con

R. I. Kinzibaev , V. S. Stolyarov , A. S. Mel'nikov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords superconductingdynamicscharge-imbalancepotentialretardationvortexcircuitseffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives a modified equation of motion for Abrikosov vortices in a type-II superconductor driven by microwave currents, starting from the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) equations. The key physical object is the charge-imbalance potential — a gauge-invariant scalar potential that arises inside and around a moving vortex core as supercurrent converts to normal current. The authors show that this potential does not relax instantaneously; its finite relaxation time tau_E introduces a retarded kernel (1 - i*omega*tau_E)^{-1} into the Ohmic part of the vortex viscosity. This retardation has two distinct consequences depending on frequency. At low frequencies (omega*tau_E << 1), expanding the kernel produces a negative effective vortex mass m_eff = -eta_Ohm * tau_E, consistent with earlier TDGL results. At high frequencies (omega*tau_E >> 1), the retarded Ohmic contribution becomes purely reactive and acts like an additional pinning force, renormalizing the depinning frequency while the remaining viscosity becomes purely relaxational. The authors then connect this modified vortex dynamics to the complex impedance and kinetic inductance of superconducting circuits, deriving explicit expressions for the vortex contribution to impedance in both frequency regimes. The correction to kinetic inductance from the charge-imbalance mechanism is proportional to the ratio of Ohmic to total viscosity and to the vortex density, and it diverges near T_c because tau_E diverges there.

What carries the argument

TDGL equations (Eqs. 6-7); collective-coordinate perturbation theory for vortex displacement (Eq. 12); solvability condition from translational zero mode (Eq. 26); diffusion equation for charge-imbalance potential mu (Eq. A5) derived under assumption xi^2 >> l_E^2; Bardeen-Stephen step-function approximation for vortex core; modified Bessel function K_1 matching at core boundary (Eq. A12-A13); Bessel asymptotics yielding the retarded kernel (Eq. A15); two-fluid model relation lambda_eff^2(omega) = lambda^2 / (1 - i*omega*tau_E)

What would settle it

Measure the microwave impedance of a superconducting film with controlled vortex density as a function of frequency and temperature near T_c. If the retarded kernel (1 - i*omega*tau_E)^{-1} correctly describes the vortex dynamics, the impedance should show a crossover from dissipative (flux-flow) to reactive (pinning-like) behavior at omega ~ 1/tau_E, with the crossover frequency scaling as (1 - T/T_c). Absence of this crossover, or a crossover frequency that does not diverge near T_c, would contradict the predicted mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is the vortex equation of motion, Eq. (27)-(28): eta(omega) * v_tilde = F_tilde_L, where the frequency-dependent viscosity eta(omega) = eta_Rel + eta_Ohm / (1 - i*omega*tau_E) - eta_tot * omega_k / (i*omega). The retarded factor (1 - i*omega*tau_E)^{-1} multiplying the Ohmic viscosity is derived from the dynamics of the charge-imbalance potential mu, which obeys a diffusion-type equation (A5) with relaxation time tau_E = l_E^2 / D. This single kernel produces both a negative effective mass at low frequencies and a pinning-like reactive response at high frequencies, unifying two previously separate phenomena under one mechanism: the finite relaxation time of the charge-imb1

Load-bearing premise

The derivation requires the charge-imbalance length l_E to be much smaller than the coherence length xi, which enters when simplifying the equation for the charge-imbalance potential to a diffusion equation and when using Bessel function asymptotics. The authors note that many experimentally relevant superconductors likely have the opposite hierarchy (l_E >> xi), and the regime where the predicted effects are strongest is exactly where the derivation is not valid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Superconducting microwave resonators operating near T_c should exhibit a frequency-dependent kinetic inductance correction from vortex motion that cannot be captured by a simple mass-plus-viscosity model; the full retarded kernel must be used.
  • In the high-frequency regime omega*tau_E >> 1, trapped vortices contribute a reactive pinning-like term to impedance even without extrinsic pinning centers, renormalizing the depinning frequency upward by a factor involving eta_Ohm / (eta_Rel * tau_E).
  • The divergence of tau_E near T_c means the crossover frequency 1/tau_E shifts downward, making retardation effects accessible at lower microwave frequencies for devices operated close to the superconducting transition.
  • For multiband or nematic superconductors, the same retardation kernel (1 - i*omega*tau)^{-1} should appear with a modified relaxation time tau, potentially offering an additional tuning knob for kinetic inductance in complex order-parameter systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The regime where the authors predict the largest enhancement of the kinetic-inductance correction (l_E >> xi) is precisely the regime where their derivation breaks down (they assume xi >> l_E). An experimental test in materials with large l_E/xi ratio would simultaneously probe the physics and the limits of the TDGL gapless approximation.
  • If the charge-imbalance relaxation time tau_E depends on the order-parameter amplitude between vortices (as the authors hint for fields near H_c2), then in a dense vortex lattice the retardation effects could appear at even lower frequencies than the isolated-vortex estimate suggests, making them relevant for devices operating in moderate magnetic fields.
  • The negative effective mass m_eff = -eta_Ohm * tau_E implies that near T_c, the vortex response has an anti-inertial character: the vortex accelerates opposite to the applied force direction at low frequencies, which could produce unusual phase shifts in resonator S-parameters that are distinguishable from conventional pinning.
  • A direct experimental signature would be measuring the frequency-dependent crossover in the vortex impedance: below 1/tau_E the response is dissipative with a negative-mass correction, above 1/tau_E it becomes reactive with a renormalized depinning frequency. Mapping this crossover as a function of temperature (since tau_E ~ 1/(1 - T/T_c)) would test the predicted divergence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript derives a frequency-dependent vortex equation of motion within the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) framework for gapless superconductors. The central result is Eq. (27)-(28), in which the Ohmic component of the vortex viscosity acquires a retarded kernel (1−iωτ_E)^{-1} arising from the dynamics of the charge-imbalance potential μ. The authors show that this kernel produces a negative effective mass m_eff = −η_Ohm τ_E at low frequencies (ωτ_E ≪ 1) and a reactive, pinning-like response at high frequencies (ωτ_E ≫ 1). The vortex equation is then used to derive corrections to the microwave impedance and kinetic inductance of superconducting circuits (Eqs. 34, 36). The derivation proceeds via a collective-coordinate perturbation expansion around a static vortex, using the translational zero-mode solvability condition (Eq. 26), with the key technical steps relegated to Appendix A.

Significance. The paper addresses a well-defined problem in vortex dynamics — the intrinsic retardation of the Ohmic viscosity channel — and provides a self-contained derivation from standard TDGL equations. The connection between the charge-imbalance potential relaxation and the (1−iωτ_E)^{-1} kernel is physically transparent and the analogy with the two-frequency-dependent penetration depth (Eq. 5) is instructive. The prediction of a negative effective mass consistent with prior results (Ref. [38]) and the renormalization of the depinning frequency at high frequencies are concrete, falsifiable results. The derivation is internally consistent within its stated domain (gapless TDGL with u² ≫ 1).

major comments (1)
  1. §IV, Eqs. (34), (36), and (37): The quantitative predictions for impedance and kinetic inductance depend on the kernel (1−iωτ_E)^{-1}, whose derivation in Appendix A requires ξ² ≫ l_E² (i.e., u² ≫ 1) at two distinct steps: (1) the reduction of Eq. (A3) to the diffusion equation (A4) by dropping terms containing ∇|ψ|², and (2) the evaluation of the integral (A14) using large-argument Bessel asymptotics K₀(z)≈K₁(z)≈(π/2z)^{1/2}e^{-z} for z = ξγ/l_E ≫ 1, which forces the ratio in (A14) to unity. The authors transparently acknowledge (Section IV, final paragraphs) that 'in many experimentally relevant superconducting systems one can expect the opposite hierarchy l_E ≫ ξ,' which would invalidate both steps. This is load-bearing because for general u² ~ 1, the full expression (A14) yields a more complex frequency-dependent kernel that does not factorize as (1−iωτ_E)^{-1}, and the regime where
minor comments (7)
  1. Eq. (5): The heuristic argument relating η_Ohm(ω) to λ²_eff(ω) is appealing but the logical flow is slightly circular — the proportionality η_Ohm ∝ l²_E/ξ² is stated as a known result and then used to motivate the (1−iωτ_E)^{-1} factor before the TDGL derivation. A brief clarifying sentence noting that this is a physical motivation, not a derivation, would help the reader.
  2. Eq. (29): The viscosity expressions contain α_Rel and α_Ohm, which are stated as numerical constants (α_Rel ≈ 0.279, α_Ohm ≈ 0.159 for u² = 12). It would help to state explicitly whether these specific numerical values are used in the subsequent impedance formulas or whether the general α_Ohm ≈ 2u^{-2} scaling is employed.
  3. Eq. (30): The depinning frequency for a vortex pinned by a cavity is given as ω_k τ_E = 2αu²/(3f'(0)²a²), but the notation f'(0) is not immediately defined at the point of use (it is stated as f'(0) ≈ 0.583/ξ only parenthetically). A forward reference or brief definition would improve readability.
  4. §IV, Eq. (34): The simplifying approximation j̃_{s,∞} = j̃_tr is noted as a limitation. The authors should briefly comment on the magnitude of the error introduced by neglecting the normal component of the transport current at finite frequency, particularly for the high-frequency regime ωτ_E ≫ 1.
  5. Appendix A, Eq. (A2): The transition from Eq. (A1) to (A2) involves using the continuity equation (9) together with Eq. (11), but the algebraic steps are compressed. A brief intermediate expression would aid verification.
  6. References: The paper by Kogan and Nakagawa (Ref. [43]) is cited for the two-fluid penetration depth, but the specific result λ²_eff(ω) = λ²(1−iωτ_E)^{-1} should be more precisely attributed or derived, as this is a standard result but the specific form with τ_E may differ from the conventional two-fluid expression.
  7. Typo in §IV: 'can also affect affect the dynamics' — duplicated 'affect'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and for identifying the precise technical steps in Appendix A where the u² ≫ 1 assumption enters. The referee's assessment of our central results and their physical significance is appreciated. Below we address the major comment point by point.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §IV, Eqs. (34), (36), (37): The quantitative predictions depend on the kernel (1−iωτ_E)^{-1}, whose derivation requires ξ² ≫ l_E² at two steps in Appendix A: (1) dropping ∇|ψ|² terms in going from (A3) to (A4), and (2) using large-argument Bessel asymptotics in (A14). The authors acknowledge that experimentally l_E ≫ ξ may hold, invalidating both steps. For general u² ~ 1, the full (A14) yields a more complex kernel that does not factorize as (1−iωτ_E)^{-1}.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the factorized kernel (1−iωτ_E)^{-1} relies on the u² ≫ 1 limit at the two steps identified, and we agree that this should be stated more explicitly in the main text rather than being implicit from the Appendix. We note the following points in response. First, the manuscript already presents the full expression (A14) before taking the large-u limit, so the general-case result is available to the reader. The ratio of Bessel functions in (A14) is the exact kernel within the Bardeen–Stephen approximation for the vortex core, and it reduces to (1−iωτ_E)^{-1} only when ξ ≫ l_E. For u² ~ 1, this ratio deviates from the simple Lorentzian form, and the referee is right that the factorization no longer holds. Second, we agree that the manuscript should more clearly delineate which results are exact within the stated TDGL framework and which additionally require u² ≫ 1. Specifically, Eqs. (34), (36), and (37) inherit the u² ≫ 1 assumption from Eq. (24), and this dependency should be flagged at the point where those equations are introduced, not only in the final paragraphs of Section IV. Third, regarding the experimentally relevant regime l_E ≫ ξ: we already note in the final paragraphs of Section IV that in this regime the spatial distributions of E and μ extend beyond the vortex core, which can enhance both η_Ohm and τ_E, and that a quantitative treatment requires solving for μ and E without the short-l_E approximation. We believe the physical mechanism — retardation of the Ohmic viscosity channel due to charge-imbalance relaxation — is robust beyond the strict u² ≫ 1 limit, since it originates from the finite relaxation time τ_E of the gauge-invariant potential μ, which is a general feature of the TDGL model. However, the specific Lorentzian form of revision: no

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • The referee's comment appears to be truncated mid-sentence ('and the regime where'), so we cannot fully determine whether there is an additional specific request beyond what we have addressed above. If the referee intended to ask for a quantitative treatment of the u² ~ 1 or l_E ≫ ξ regime, we note that this would require numerical solution of Eq. (A9) with the full Bessel-function ratio in (A14) and, for l_E ≫ ξ, abandoning the Bardeen–Stephen core approximation altogether. This is a substantial extension beyond the scope of the present work, which is explicitly framed within the gapless TDGL model with u² ≫ 1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the retarded kernel (1−iωτ_E)⁻¹ is derived from TDGL equations via Appendix A, with numerical constants from independent prior work.

full rationale

The paper derives the vortex equation of motion (Eqs. 27–28) starting from the standard TDGL equations (Eqs. 6–7), which are attributed to Gor'kov–Eliashberg and Kopnin (Refs. [29, 44, 45]) — external, well-established sources. The central result, the retarded viscosity kernel (1−iωτ_E)⁻¹ in Eq. (24), is obtained through a perturbative calculation detailed in Appendix A: the charge-imbalance potential μ is shown to satisfy a diffusion equation (A5) under the assumption ξ²≫l_E², and the integral (A14) is evaluated using Bessel function asymptotics to yield Eq. (24) = Eq. (A15). The numerical constants α_Rel≈0.279 and α_Ohm≈0.159 are taken from independent prior calculations by Kupriyanov–Likharev (Ref. [47]) and Hu (Refs. [48, 49]). The heuristic argument in Eq. (5) — relating the kernel to the two-fluid model's frequency-dependent penetration depth — is presented as physical motivation, not as the derivation itself; the actual derivation in Appendix A proceeds independently from the TDGL equations. The self-citations (Refs. [42, 50]) are to prior work by one of the authors (Mel'nikov) on related but distinct topics (anisotropic vortex motion, vortex pinning) and are not load-bearing for the central kernel derivation. The assumption u²≫1 is a stated limitation, not a circularity: the paper transparently acknowledges in Section IV that 'in many experimentally relevant superconducting systems one can expect the opposite hierarchy l_E≫ξ' and that quantitative predictions require further work in that regime. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities are postulated. The charge-imbalance potential μ is a known quantity in nonequilibrium superconductivity (Kopnin, Ref. [29]). The retardation time τ_E = l_E²/D is a standard TDGL timescale. All free parameters (α_Rel, α_Ohm, ω_k) are either imported from prior calculations or treated as external inputs.

free parameters (3)
  • α_Rel = ≈0.279
    Dimensionless relaxational viscosity coefficient, taken from prior numerical calculations (Refs. [47-49]) under u²=12. Not fitted in this paper but imported.
  • α_Ohm = ≈0.159 (for u²=12); ≈2u⁻² (general)
    Dimensionless Ohmic viscosity coefficient, taken from prior works and generalized as α_Ohm ≈ 2u⁻² for u² ≫ 1.
  • ω_k = Not specified; depends on pinning center
    Depinning frequency treated as an external parameter characterizing the pinning potential, not derived from first principles in this work.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption TDGL equations (6)-(7) describe gapless superconductors near T_c
    Standard result from Gor'kov-Eliashberg (Ref. [44]) and Kramer-Watts-Tobin (Refs. [45,46]). Invoked in Section II as the starting model.
  • domain assumption ξ² ≫ l_E² (equivalently u² ≫ 1)
    Used in Appendix A to drop ∇|ψ|² terms in Eq. (A3) and to apply Bessel asymptotics. The authors note this is violated in many experimentally relevant systems.
  • domain assumption Single isolated vortex limit (vortex density well below H_c2)
    Stated in Section III title and Section V conclusions. Overlap of charge-imbalance regions is neglected.
  • domain assumption Linear response in vortex velocity v
    Perturbation expansion to first order in v, Eq. (12). Nonlinear corrections are of order (|j_s,∞|/j_crit)³ as noted after Eq. (30).
  • domain assumption Bardeen-Stephen step-function approximation for f_0 and χ_1 inside the core
    Used in Appendix A to solve for μ inside and outside the core, matching at ρ=ξ. Standard approximation in vortex theory.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effect of charge-imbalance potential relaxation on the high-frequency vortex dynamics and kinetic inductance of superconducting circuits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4FQFPPPJ

@misc{pith2026260706390,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effect of charge-imbalance potential relaxation on the high-frequency vortex dynamics and kinetic inductance of superconducting circuits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4FQFPPPJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06390}
}
abstract

We show that relaxation of the charge-imbalance potential plays a key role in the retarded dynamics of Abrikosov vortices in a type-II superconducting sample carrying a microwave current. Starting from the time-dependent Ginzburg--Landau equations we derive the vortex equation of motion accounting both the dissipation and retardation effects. The retardation is governed by the dynamics of the charge-imbalance potential and reveals itself at characteristic timescales diverging near the superconducting critical temperature $T_{c}$. These retardation effects in vortex dynamics strongly affect the kinetic inductance of superconducting circuits being, thus, responsible for the magnetic field dependence of characteristics of different superconducting devices in the high frequency range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06390 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of a moving vortex with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [38]

    van Otterlo, M

    A. van Otterlo, M. Feigel’man, V. Geshkenbein, and G. Blatter, Vortex dynamics and the hall anomaly: A microscopic analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3736 (1995)

    work page 1995

  2. [1]

    and parametric amplifiers [21–25]. One can distinguish two basic mechanisms underlying the effect of applied magnetic field on the kinetic induc- tance: (i) first, the field-induced supercurrents suppress the superconducting order parameter and, thus, cause the increase in the London penetration depth according to Eq. (1); (ii) second, rather strong magne...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  3. [2]

    G¨ oppl, A

    M. G¨ oppl, A. Fragner, M. Baur, R. Bianchetti, S. Filipp, J. M. Fink, P. J. Leek, G. Puebla, L. Steffen, and A. Wall- raff, Coplanar waveguide resonators for circuit quantum electrodynamics, Journal of Applied Physics104, 113904 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [3]

    Zmuidzinas, Superconducting microresonators: Physics and applications, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics3, 169 (2012)

    J. Zmuidzinas, Superconducting microresonators: Physics and applications, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics3, 169 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [4]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gus- tavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits, Applied Physics Reviews6, 021318 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [5]

    Bakurskiy, M

    S. Bakurskiy, M. Kupriyanov, N. V. Klenov, I. Soloviev, A. Schegolev, R. Morari, Y. Khaydukov, and A. S. Sidorenko, Controlling the proximity effect in a co/nb multilayer: the properties of electronic transport, Beil- stein Journal of Nanotechnology11, 1336 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [6]

    A. A. Neilo, S. V. Bakurskiy, N. V. Klenov, I. I. Soloviev, and M. Y. Kupriyanov, Magnetic control of the kinetic inductance in elements of superconducting electronics, 9 JETP Letters121, 58 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [7]

    I. A. Nazhestkin, S. V. Bakurskiy, A. A. Neilo, I. E. Tarasova, N. G. Ismailov, V. L. Gurtovoi, S. V. Egorov, S. A. Lisitsyn, V. S. Stolyarov, V. N. Antonov, V. V. Ryazanov, M. Y. Kupriyanov, I. I. Soloviev, N. V. Klenov, and D. S. Yakovlev, High kinetic inductance in platinum-coated aluminum nanobridge interferometers, Advanced Engineering Materials27, 2...

    work page 2025

Show all 54 references
  1. [8]

    A. D. Semenov, G. N. Gol’tsman, and A. A. Korneev, Quantum detection by current carrying superconducting film, Physica C: Superconductivity351, 349 (2001)

    2001

  2. [9]

    D. Y. Vodolazov, Nonlinear kinetic inductance sensor, JETP Letters118, 773 (2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    P. K. Day, H. G. LeDuc, B. A. Mazin, A. Vayonakis, and J. Zmuidzinas, A broadband superconducting detector suitable for use in large arrays, Nature425, 817 (2003)

    2003

  4. [11]

    Roitman, C

    A. Roitman, C. Pfaff, T. Hauet, A. Shaulov, and Y. Yeshurun, Microwave kinetic inductance detector made of molecular beam epitaxy (mbe)-grown mgb2 film, Nanomaterials14, 1731 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    Roitman, L

    A. Roitman, L. Burlachkov, A. Sharoni, A. Shaulov, and Y. Yeshurun, Suppression of magnetic vortex losses in submicron nbn coplanar waveguide resonators, Sci. Rep. 14, 26444 (2024)

    2024

  6. [13]

    D. C. Moore, B. A. Mazing, S. Golwala, B. Bumble, J. Gao, B. A. Young, S. McHugth, P. K. Day, H. G. LeDuc, and J. Zmuidzinas, Quasiparticle trapping in mi- crowave kinetic inductance strip detectors, AIP Confer- ence Proceedings1185, 168 (2009)

    2009

  7. [14]

    Vardulakis, S

    G. Vardulakis, S. Withington, D. J. Goldie, and D. M. Glowacka, Superconducting kinetic inductance detectors for astrophysics, Measurement Science and Technology 19, 015509 (2007)

    2007

  8. [15]

    M. R. Vissers, J. Hubmayr, M. Sandberg, S. Chaudhuri, C. Bockstiegel, and J. Gao, Frequency-tunable supercon- ducting resonators via nonlinear kinetic inductance, Ap- plied Physics Letters107, 062601 (2015)

    2015

  9. [16]

    Boissonneault, A

    M. Boissonneault, A. C. Doherty, F. R. Ong, P. Bertet, D. Vion, D. Esteve, and A. Blais, Back-action of a driven nonlinear resonator on a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. A85, 022305 (2012)

    2012

  10. [17]

    Krantz, A

    P. Krantz, A. Bengtsson, M. Simoen, S. Gustavsson, V. Shumeiko, W. Oliver, C. Wilson, P. Delsing, and J. Bylander, Single-shot read-out of a superconducting qubit using a josephson parametric oscillator, Nature communications7, 11417 (2016)

    2016

  11. [18]

    S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, Engineering the quan- tum states of light in a kerr-nonlinear resonator by two- photon driving, npj Quantum Information3, 10 (2017)

    2017

  12. [19]

    Stockklauser, P

    A. Stockklauser, P. Scarlino, J. V. Koski, S. Gasparinetti, C. K. Andersen, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, and A. Wallraff, Strong coupling cavity qed with gate-defined double quantum dots enabled by a high impedance resonator, Phys. Rev. X7, 011030 (2017)

    2017

  13. [20]

    A. J. Landig, J. V. Koski, P. Scarlino, U. Mendes, A. Blais, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, A. Wallraff, K. En- sslin, and T. Ihn, Coherent spin–photon coupling using a resonant exchange qubit, Nature560, 179 (2018)

    2018

  14. [21]

    Luomahaara, V

    J. Luomahaara, V. Vesterinen, L. Gr¨ onberg, and J. Has- sel, Kinetic inductance magnetometer, Nat. Commun.5, 10.1038/ncomms5872

    doi

  15. [22]

    M. A. Castellanos-Beltran and K. W. Lehnert, Widely tunable parametric amplifier based on a superconduct- ing quantum interference device array resonator, Applied Physics Letters91, 083509 (2007)

    2007

  16. [23]

    Ho Eom, P

    B. Ho Eom, P. T. Day, H. G. LeDuc, and J. Zmuidzinas, A wideband, low-noise superconducting amplifier with high dynamic range, Nature Phys8, 623 (2012)

    2012

  17. [24]

    Siddiqi, R

    I. Siddiqi, R. Vijay, F. Pierre, C. M. Wilson, M. Met- calfe, C. Rigetti, L. Frunzio, and M. H. Devoret, Rf- driven josephson bifurcation amplifier for quantum mea- surement, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 207002 (2004)

    2004

  18. [25]

    Malnou, M

    M. Malnou, M. Vissers, J. Wheeler, J. Aumentado, J. Hubmayr, J. Ullom, and J. Gao, Three-wave mixing kinetic inductance traveling-wave amplifier with near- quantum-limited noise performance, PRX Quantum2, 010302 (2021)

    2021

  19. [26]

    Chien, Y.-H

    W.-C. Chien, Y.-H. Chang, C. X. Lu, Y.-Y. Ting, C.-S. Wu, S.-D. Lin, and W. Kuo, Large parametric amplifi- cation in kinetic inductance dominant resonators based on 3 nm-thick epitaxial superconductors, Materials for Quantum Technology3, 025005 (2023)

    2023

  20. [27]

    M. J. Stephen and J. Bardeen, Viscosity of type-ii super- conductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 112 (1965)

    1965

  21. [28]

    Bardeen and M

    J. Bardeen and M. J. Stephen, Theory of the motion of vortices in superconductors, Phys. Rev.140, A1197 (1965)

    1965

  22. [29]

    L. P. Gor’kov and N. B. Kopnin, Vortex motion and resis- tivity of type-ll superconductors in a magnetic field, Usp. Fiz. Nauk116, 413 (1975), [Sov. Phys. Usp. 18, 496-513 (1975)]

    1975

  23. [30]

    Kopnin,Theory of Nonequilibrium Superconductivity, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Claren- don Press, Oxford, 2001)

    N. Kopnin,Theory of Nonequilibrium Superconductivity, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Claren- don Press, Oxford, 2001)

    2001

  24. [31]

    Golosovsky, M

    M. Golosovsky, M. Tsindlekht, H. Chayet, and D. Davi- dov, Vortex depinning frequency in YBa 2Cu3O7−x su- perconducting thin films: Anisotropy and temperature dependence, Phys. Rev. B50, 470 (1994)

    1994

  25. [32]

    M. W. Coffey and J. R. Clem, Unified theory of effects of vortex pinning and flux creep upon the rf surface impedance of type-ii superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 386 (1991)

    1991

  26. [33]

    Suhl, Inertial mass of a moving fluxoid, Phys

    H. Suhl, Inertial mass of a moving fluxoid, Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 226 (1965)

    1965

  27. [34]

    J. I. Gittleman and B. Rosenblum, Radio-frequency re- sistance in the mixed state for subcritical currents, Phys. Rev. Lett.16, 734 (1966)

    1966

  28. [35]

    N. B. Kopnin, Frequency singularities of the dissipation in the mixed state of pure type-ii superconductors at low temperatures, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.27, 417 (1978), [JETP Lett. 27, 390 (1978)]

    1978

  29. [36]

    N. B. Kopnin and V. M. Vinokur, Dynamic vortex mass in clean fermi superfluids and superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3952 (1998)

    1998

  30. [37]

    Blatter, M

    G. Blatter, M. V. Feigel’man, V. B. Geshkenbein, A. I. Larkin, and V. M. Vinokur, Vortices in high-temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.66, 1125 (1994)

    1994

  31. [39]

    M. Y. Kupriyanov and K. K. Likharev, Microwave impedance of superconductors in the mixed state, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.68, 1506 (1975), [JETP 41, 755 (1975)]

    1975

  32. [40]

    Wang and S

    C.-Y. Wang and S. M. Anlage, Microwave microscope studies of trapped vortex dynamics in superconductors, Phys. Rev. B111, 214524 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Al Luhaibi, A

    A. Al Luhaibi, A. Glatz, and J. B. Ketterson, Vortex- antivortex states in nanopatterned superconducting 10 films, Phys. Rev. Applied23, 054005 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Tinkham,Introduction to superconductivity(Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford, MA, 2004)

    M. Tinkham,Introduction to superconductivity(Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford, MA, 2004)

    2004

  35. [43]

    V. M. Genkin and A. S. Mel’nikov, Motion of abrikosov vortices in anisotropic superconductors, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.95, 2170 (1989), [JETP 68, 1254 (1989)]

    1989

  36. [44]

    V. G. Kogan and N. Nakagawa, Moving vortices in anisotropic superconductors, Phys. Rev. B104, 094523 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    L. P. Gor’kov and G. M. Eliashberg, Generalization of the ginzburg-landau equations for non-stationary problems in the case of alloys with paramagnetic impurities, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.54, 612 (1968), [Sov. Phys. JETP 27, 328 (1968)]

    1968

  38. [46]

    Kramer and R

    L. Kramer and R. J. Watts-Tobin, Theory of dissipa- tive current-carrying states in superconducting filaments, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 1041 (1978)

    1978

  39. [47]

    R. J. Watts-Tobin, Y. Kr¨ ahenb¨ uhl, and L. Kramer, Nonequilibrium theory of dirty, current-carrying super- conductors: phase-slip oscillators in narrow filaments near tc, Journal of Low Temperature Physics42, 459 (1981)

    1981

  40. [48]

    M. Y. Kupriyanov and K. K. Likharev, Viscous motion of vortices in the type ii superconductors, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.15, 349 (1972), [JETP Lett. 15 247 (1972)]

    1972

  41. [49]

    Hu, Numerical constants for isolated vortices in superconductors, Phys

    C.-R. Hu, Numerical constants for isolated vortices in superconductors, Phys. Rev. B6, 1756 (1972)

    1972

  42. [50]

    Hu and R

    C.-R. Hu and R. S. Thompson, Impurity effect on flux- flow resistivity in gapless superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.31, 217 (1973)

    1973

  43. [51]

    A. A. Bespalov and A. S. Mel’nikov, Abrikosov vortex pinning on a cylindrical cavity inside the vortex core: for- mation of a bound state and depinning, Superconductor Science and Technology26, 085014 (2013)

    2013

  44. [52]

    A. M. Gulian and G. F. Zharkov,Nonequilibrium Elec- trons and Phonons in Superconductors: Selected Topics in Superconductivity(Springer, Berlin, 2002)

    2002

  45. [53]

    Silaev and A

    M. Silaev and A. Vargunin, Vortex motion and flux- flow resistivity in dirty multiband superconductors, Phys. Rev. B94, 224506 (2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    Castillo Menegotto, R

    F. Castillo Menegotto, R. S. Severino, P. D. Mininni, E. Fradkin, V. Bekeris, G. Pasquini, and G. S. Lozano, Vortex flow anisotropy in nematic superconductors, Phys. Rev. B112, 134506 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.