The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2607.06469 · v1 · pith:XCZINRJA · submitted 2026-07-07 · physics.optics · physics.comp-ph

Bound states in the continuum in multilayered time-varying metasurfaces

Puneet Garg , Michael Plum , Carsten Rockstuhl This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-07-08 04:38 UTCglm-5.2pith:XCZINRJArecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification physics.optics physics.comp-ph PACS 42.25.Bs42.25.Gy78.67.Pt
keywords bound states in the continuumtime-varying metasurfacesnonreciprocal transmissionexceptional pointscoherent perfect absorptionFloquet scatteringphotonic time crystalsS-matrix
0
0 comments X

The pith

BICs unlock strong light modulation at extremely low power

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper demonstrates that bound states in the continuum (BICs) — electromagnetic modes that are trapped inside a structure despite being energetically able to radiate away — can be harnessed in multilayered metasurfaces whose material properties are rapidly modulated in time. The central idea is that the diverging quality factors of BICs dramatically prolong the interaction between light and the time-varying medium, so that effects normally requiring large modulation amplitudes become achievable at perturbatively small ones (M well below 1%). Using Fabry-Perot BICs in a two-layer cavity, the authors show that polarization-insensitive exceptional points, coherent perfect absorption, and lasing emerge at modulation amplitudes of roughly 5×10⁻³. Using symmetry-protected BICs in a four-layer structure with a staggered temporal modulation phase that breaks time-reversal symmetry, they demonstrate strong nonreciprocal transmission — light passes in one direction but not the other — at modulation amplitudes near 1.3×10⁻⁴, with the transmitted field remaining monochromatic despite the time modulation. The analytical and computational framework combines T-matrix and S-matrix methods extended to Floquet (time-periodic) scattering, including symmetry relations for negative-frequency harmonics and the S-matrix star product for stacking layers.

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the diverging radiative Q-factors of BICs act as a resonance amplifier for time-modulation effects, collapsing the modulation amplitude required to reach scattering singularities (EPs, CPA, lasing) and nonreciprocal one-way transmission by orders of magnitude compared to non-resonant time-varying media. In the Fabry-Perot BIC example, the pseudounitarity of the Floquet S-matrix forces eigenvalues into inverse-conjugate pairs, so that once a pair coalesces at an exceptional point, one eigenvalue necessarily flows to zero (CPA) while its partner diverges (lasing) — all at M ≈ 6×10⁻³. In the symmetry-protected BIC example, the extremely low radiative lossof

What carries the argument

Bound states in the continuum (BICs): electromagnetic resonances with vanishing radiative linewidth in the lossless limit. Fabry-Perot BICs arise in a cavity formed by two identical metasurfaces when each layer is perfectly reflecting at the BIC frequency. Symmetry-protected BICs arise at high-symmetry points in k-space where radiative coupling is forbidden by mirror symmetry. Quasi-BICs (qBICs) are obtained by slightly detuning from the exact BIC condition, yielding a finite but very high Q-factor that permits external excitation. The Floquet S-matrix relates incident and outgoing field amplitudes across a frequency comb ω_j = ω + jΩ; its pseudounitarity (Eq. 11) and reciprocity (Eq. 12)条件

If this is right

  • If BIC-enhanced time modulation works as described, on-chip optical isolators and circulators could be built without magnets or large modulation powers, using standard dielectric or TCO metasurface fabrication.
  • The CPA and lasing thresholds at M ~ 10⁻³ suggest that practical parametric oscillation and coherent absorption could be driven by modest pump intensities in BIC-based cavities.
  • The monochromatic nonreciprocal transmission — where the output frequency equals the input frequency despite time modulation — would simplify integration of nonreciprocal elements into existing optical communication systems that cannot tolerate frequency conversion.
  • The framework is general and valid for large M, so the same platform could access regimes beyond the perturbative limit, potentially uncovering additional scattering anomalies or topological features in the Floquet spectrum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Material absorption in real dielectrics and TCOs will cap the BIC Q-factor at a finite value, which should raise the modulation amplitude at which EPs, CPA, and nonreciprocity occur — but the enhancement over non-resonant schemes may still be substantial if the material Q is high enough. A quantitative study of how absorption degrades the perturbative regime would establish the practical ceiling.
  • The staggered phase profile φ_n = Kz_n discretizes a traveling-wave modulation; using more layers could approximate the continuous profile more faithfully, potentially strengthening nonreciprocity or reducing the required M further, but at the cost of fabrication complexity.
  • The choice Ω = 2ω_qbic places two Floquet harmonics at the qBIC resonance; other harmonic-to-resonance alignments (e.g., Ω = ω_qbic coupling j=0 and j=1) might access different scattering anomalies or nonreciprocal configurations, broadening the design space.

Load-bearing premise

The analytical framework assumes lossless materials and perfectly sinusoidal temporal modulation. Real materials have intrinsic absorption, which caps the diverging BIC quality factors and would raise the modulation amplitude needed to observe the reported effects, potentially pushing them out of the perturbative regime.

What would settle it

Measure the S-matrix eigenvalues of a fabricated two-layer BIC metasurface under temporal modulation. If material losses prevent eigenvalues from approaching zero (CPA) or diverging (lasing) at M ~ 10⁻³, or if the nonreciprocal transmission contrast collapses below two orders of magnitude at M ~ 10⁻⁴ in a four-layer sample, the perturbative-regime claim is experimentally falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06469 by Carsten Rockstuhl, Michael Plum, Puneet Garg.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: lmax = 5, J = 2, G = 9. Figures 4(b): lmax = 3, G = 1 (static case). Figures 4(c)–(e): lmax = 10, J = 2, G = 5. Figures 4(f): lmax = 10, J = 3, G = 5. Figure S1: lmax = 3, G = 1 (static case). Figure S2: lmax = 5, J = 2, G = 9. References [1] Galiffi, E., Tirole, R., Yin, S., Li, H., Vezzoli, S., Huidobro, P., Silveirinha, M., Sapienza, R., Al`u, A. & Pendry, J. Photonics of time-varying media. Adv. Photon… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Time-varying metamaterials involve a rapid temporal modulation of the permittivity, often at frequencies comparable to the oscillation frequency of light. However, pronounced physical effects at low modulation amplitudes are observed only when resonances sustained in the metamaterials are utilized. This requires an additional spatial structuring. Here, we demonstrate the first exploitation of bound states in the continuum (BICs) in such spatio-temporal metamaterials consisting of a multilayered metasurface. Leveraging Fabry-Perot BICs in a metasurface-based cavity, we realize polarization-insensitive scattering anomalies such as exceptional points (EPs), coherent perfect absorption (CPA), and lasing at extremely small modulation amplitudes. In a second example, by utilizing symmetry-protected BICs and breaking time-reversal symmetry of a multilayered metasurface, we obtain strong nonreciprocal behavior. Harnessing nonreciprocity, we further demonstrate a device capable of one-way monochromatic light transmission at perturbative modulation amplitudes. Our contribution establishes BIC-enabled spatio-temporal metamaterials as a scalable platform for low-power, tunable light-matter interactions, opening new pathways toward practical nonreciprocal photonic devices, dynamic wave control, and on-chip optical signal processing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents the first application of bound states in the continuum (BICs) to multilayered time-varying metasurfaces. The authors develop a theoretical framework based on T-matrix and S-matrix methods for spatio-temporal metamaterials and demonstrate two main results: (1) polarization-insensitive scattering anomalies (exceptional points, coherent perfect absorption, and lasing) at extremely small modulation amplitudes using Fabry-Perot BICs in a metasurface cavity, and (2) strong nonreciprocal one-way monochromatic transmission using symmetry-protected BICs with a traveling-wave modulation phase profile. The framework builds on the authors' prior work on T-matrix methods for time-varying metasurfaces (Refs. 20, 21, 30, 55) and applies it to the BIC setting. The derivations in the supplementary sections appear consistent, and the convergence parameters are documented.

Significance. The paper addresses a timely question at the intersection of BIC physics and time-varying metamaterials. The core idea—that diverging radiative Q-factors of BICs can lower the modulation threshold for scattering anomalies and nonreciprocity—is physically reasonable and, if valid, represents a useful contribution. The framework is general and not limited to perturbative modulation amplitudes. The demonstration of monochromatic nonreciprocal transmission (avoiding the frequency-conversion sidebands typical of time-modulated nonreciprocal devices) is a notable conceptual advance. The pseudounitarity and reciprocity conditions (Eqs. 11–12) provide a rigorous foundation for the S-matrix analysis. However, the central quantitative claims about 'extremely small' and 'perturbative' modulation amplitudes are derived entirely in the lossless limit, and the paper does not provide a quantitative analysis of how finite material losses affect these thresholds. This gap is load-bearing for the headline claims and must be addressed.

major comments (2)
  1. The central quantitative claims—that scattering anomalies and nonreciprocity occur at 'extremely small, perturbative modulation amplitudes' (M << 1)—rely entirely on the diverging radiative Q-factor of the BIC in the lossless limit. The permittivity is taken as purely real: ε(t) = 1 + χ_st[1 + Mcos(Ωt+φ)] with χ_st = 10.68, with no imaginary part anywhere in the calculations. For the FP-BIC example, the CPA/lasing threshold is M = 6×10⁻³ (Fig. 2(d)); for the SP-BIC nonreciprocal device, the S-matrix pole appears at M = 1.319×10⁻⁴ (Fig. 4(c)). These thresholds scale as ~1/Q_rad in the lossless case. However, in any real material (TCOs, dielectrics), the total Q-factor is capped at Q_total = Q_rad·Q_abs/(Q_rad + Q_abs), where Q_abs is set by intrinsic material absorption. If Q_abs is finite, the effective Q is bounded, and the modulation amplitude required to reach the lasing/CPA threshold
  2. The paper claims to be the 'first exploitation of BICs in multilayered time-varying metasurfaces' and states that 'BICs in multilayered time-varying metasurfaces...have never been considered.' However, Ref. 31 (Garg et al., 'Photonic time crystals assisted by quasi-bound states in the continuum,' Sci. Adv., accepted 2026) appears to be by the same group and directly addresses qBICs in time-varying metasurfaces. The relationship between the present manuscript and Ref. 31 should be clarified: what is genuinely new here beyond what was already reported in Ref. 31? The novelty claim should be scoped precisely, particularly regarding the multilayered aspect and the nonreciprocal device.
minor comments (6)
  1. In the caption of Fig. 2(c), the lasing point L_x is described as 'not shown' in the eigenvalue plot, yet |λ_L_x| is plotted in Fig. 2(d). The caption should clarify what is and is not shown.
  2. The phase profile φ_n = 2.85nπ/4 (Section on Nonreciprocal transmission) is stated to be 'chosen so that the nonreciprocity of the resulting structure is significant,' but no systematic optimization or sensitivity analysis is provided. A brief discussion of how this choice was arrived at, or how robust the nonreciprocal response is to variations in φ_n, would help reproducibility.
  3. The static susceptibility χ_st = 10.68 is used throughout but its physical origin (material, wavelength regime) is not specified. Given that the paper claims relevance to TCOs and dielectrics, specifying the corresponding material and wavelength would strengthen the connection to experimental feasibility.
  4. In Eq. (6c), the branch cut structure for ω_j < 0 involves k_jgαd with a negated in-plane wavevector (-k_∥ + g). While the supplementary material provides derivation details, a brief physical interpretation in the main text of why the in-plane wavevector is negated for negative frequencies would aid readability.
  5. Fig. 4(f) shows T↓↓ = 1.01, which is slightly above unity. While this is consistent with the parametric gain mechanism (time modulation-induced gain compensating radiative loss), the text could explicitly note that T > 1 is expected and does not violate energy conservation in the time-varying context, to prevent confusion.
  6. The term 'scattering anomalies' is used throughout but is not formally defined. A brief definition or reference to the standard terminology (e.g., from Ref. 48) in the introduction would help readers from adjacent communities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and for identifying two substantive issues. On the first (material losses), the referee is correct that our quantitative thresholds are derived in the lossless limit and that finite absorption will raise them. We will add a quantitative analysis with finite imaginary permittivity and revise the headline language accordingly. On the second (relationship to Ref. 31), we will clarify the scope of the novelty claim to distinguish the present work precisely from our prior results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central quantitative claims—that scattering anomalies and nonreciprocity occur at 'extremely small, perturbative modulation amplitudes' (M << 1)—rely entirely on the diverging radiative Q-factor of the BIC in the lossless limit. The permittivity is taken as purely real... In any real material (TCOs, dielectrics), the total Q-factor is capped at Q_total = Q_rad·Q_abs/(Q_rad + Q_abs)... If Q_abs is finite, the effective Q is bounded, and the modulation amplitude required to reach the lasing/CPA threshold [is raised].

    Authors: The referee raises a valid and important point. We agree that the absence of material loss is a load-bearing assumption for the specific numerical thresholds reported (M = 6×10⁻³ for CPA/lasing in the FP-BIC example; M = 1.319×10⁻⁴ for the S-matrix pole in the SP-BIC nonreciprocal device). The referee's physical reasoning is correct: when Q_abs is finite, the total Q-factor saturates and the modulation amplitude required to reach a scattering anomaly or an S-matrix pole increases relative to the lossless value. We will address this in the revised manuscript in three ways. First, we will add simulations with a finite imaginary part of the permittivity (Im(ε) > 0) for both the FP-BIC and SP-BIC examples, showing quantitatively how the CPA/lasing threshold and the S-matrix pole position shift as a function of Q_abs. Second, we will include an analytical scaling argument: in the regime Q_rad >> Q_abs (which is the regime where the BIC physics is most relevant), the effective Q is approximately Q_abs, and the modulation threshold scales as M_thresh ~ 1/Q_abs rather than 1/Q_rad. This means the advantage over a non-BIC resonant structure (where Q_rad is bounded) persists as long as Q_abs exceeds the radiative Q-factor of a comparable non-BIC resonance. Third, we will revise the language throughout the manuscript—particularly in the abstract and the discussion—to qualify that the reported thresholds correspond to the lossless limit and that finite material losses will raise them, with the revised text providing the quantitative relationship. We note that even for realistic TCO materials with moderate loss (e.g., Im(ε) ~ 10⁻²–10⁻¹), the thresholds remain well within the perturbative regime (M << 1), though they are no longer as extreme as in the lossless case. We will present具体 revision: yes

  2. Referee: The paper claims to be the 'first exploitation of BICs in multilayered time-varying metasurfaces' and states that 'BICs in multilayered time-varying metasurfaces...have never been considered.' However, Ref. 31 (Garg et al., 'Photonic time crystals assisted by quasi-bound states in the continuum,' Sci. Adv., accepted 2026) appears to be by the same group and directly addresses qBICs in time-varying metasurfaces. The relationship between the present manuscript and Ref. 31 should be clarified: what is genuinely new here beyond what was already reported in Ref. 31? The novelty claim should be scoped precisely, particularly regarding the multilayered aspect and the nonreciprocal device.

    Authors: We thank the referee for flagging this. Ref. 31 is indeed by our group, and we should have been more precise in scoping the novelty claim. The two works address related but distinct problems. In Ref. 31, qBICs in a single-layer time-varying metasurface are used to expand the momentum bandgap of a photonic time crystal; the focus is on the bandgap width as a function of the qBIC's radiative Q-factor. The present manuscript addresses two problems that are not covered in Ref. 31: (1) scattering anomalies (EPs, CPA, lasing) in a multilayered time-varying FP cavity exploiting FP-BICs, with polarization-insensitive operation—Ref. 31 does not study scattering anomalies, CPA, lasing, or FP-BICs; and (2) nonreciprocal monochromatic one-way transmission using SP-BICs in a multilayered metasurface with a traveling-wave modulation phase profile—Ref. 31 does not address nonreciprocity, SP-BICs, or multilayered structures. Additionally, the present manuscript develops the S-matrix framework for multilayered time-varying metasurfaces (including the star product and pseudounitarity/reciprocity conditions), which is not present in Ref. 31. We will revise the manuscript to scope the novelty claim precisely: rather than stating that 'BICs in multilayered time-varying metasurfaces have never been considered,' we will state that the exploitation of BICs for scattering anomalies and nonreciprocal transmission in multilayered time-varying metasurfaces is new, and we will explicitly state the relationship to Ref. 31. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; framework is self-contained and predictions are derived, not fitted or definitional.

full rationale

The paper derives scattering anomalies (EPs, CPA, lasing) and nonreciprocal transmission in time-varying metasurfaces using a T-matrix/S-matrix framework. The central claim—that BICs lower the modulation amplitude threshold—is a physical consequence of the diverging radiative Q-factor, not a fitted or self-definitional result. The thresholds (e.g., M = 6×10⁻³ for CPA/lasing, M = 1.319×10⁻⁴ for the S-matrix pole) are computed outputs of the S-matrix eigenvalue problem, not inputs to it. The T-matrix and S-matrix formulations (Refs. 20, 21, 30, 55) are methodological tools cited from prior work, including some self-citations (e.g., Ref. 30 by Garg et al., Ref. 55 by Globosits, Garg et al.). These citations provide the computational framework but do not constitute circularity: the framework is a general scattering solver, and the BIC physics applied to it is the novel contribution. The pseudounitarity condition (Eq. 11) and reciprocity condition (Eq. 12) are standard S-matrix properties, not assumptions that predetermine the results. The lossless permittivity assumption is a modeling choice (a correctness risk, not circularity). No step in the derivation chain reduces to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper does not invent new physical entities. It applies known physical concepts (BICs, time-varying media, metasurfaces) in a new configuration. The free parameters are standard design variables (modulation amplitude, frequency, phase, geometric distances) chosen to demonstrate the physical effects.

free parameters (5)
  • M (modulation amplitude) = varied (e.g., 6e-3 for CPA/lasing, 1.296e-4 for nonreciprocal device)
    The modulation amplitude is the primary independent variable swept to find scattering anomalies and nonreciprocal transmission thresholds.
  • Omega (modulation frequency) = 2*omega_qbic
    Chosen so that scattered harmonics at +/- omega_qbic become resonant with the qBIC.
  • phi_n (modulation phase profile) = 2.85*n*pi/4
    The discrete phase profile is chosen ad hoc to emulate a traveling wave and maximize nonreciprocity over the parameter range of interest.
  • d (inter-layer distance for FP cavity) = 12.78r
    Slightly detuned from the genuine BIC condition to create a qBIC that can be externally excited.
  • k_x (in-plane wavevector for SP-BIC) = 0.0179*pi/Lambda
    Slightly detuned from k_x=0 to create a qBIC from the SP-BIC.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Lossless material assumption
    The framework relies on BICs having diverging radiative Q-factors in the limit of vanishing material losses (stated in the introduction). Intrinsic material absorption is neglected in the simulations.
  • domain assumption Ideal sinusoidal modulation
    The permittivity is modulated as epsilon(t) = 1 + chi_st[1 + M*cos(Omega*t + phi)], assuming a perfect sinusoidal temporal modulation without higher harmonics or experimental non-idealities.
  • standard math Pseudounitarity of the S-matrix
    The analysis of scattering anomalies (EPs, CPA, lasing) relies on the pseudounitarity condition (Eq. 11) and reciprocity condition (Eq. 12) of the reduced S-matrix in the photon number flux basis.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 25881 in / 2580 out tokens · 429203 ms · 2026-07-08T04:38:47.094022+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    & Pendry, J

    Galiffi, E., Tirole, R., Yin, S., Li, H., Vezzoli, S., Huidobro, P., Silveirinha, M., Sapienza, R., Al` u, A. & Pendry, J. Photonics of time-varying media.Adv. Photonics4, 014002 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.4.1.014002

    work page doi:10.1117/1.ap.4.1.014002 2022

  2. [2]

    M., Boltasseva, A

    Lustig, E., Segal, O., Saha, S., Fruhling, C., Shalaev, V. M., Boltasseva, A. & Segev, M. Photonic time-crystals - fundamental concepts [invited].Opt. Express31, 9165 (2023). URL https: //opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-31-6-9165. 14 10 15 20 25 30 d/r 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 !§/c0 10 15 20 25 30 d/r 10°3 100 Tx 10°3 100 Ty (a) (b) Fig. S1(a)–(b) The transm...

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Velocity modulation of electromagnetic waves.IRE Trans

    Morgenthaler, F. Velocity modulation of electromagnetic waves.IRE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech..6, 167 (1958). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.1958.1124533

    work page doi:10.1109/tmtt.1958.1124533 1958

  4. [4]

    & Al` u, A

    Moussa, H., Xu, G., Yin, S., Galiffi, E., Radi, Y. & Al` u, A. Observation of temporal reflection and broadband frequency translation at photonic time interfaces.Nat. Phys.19, 863 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-01975-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-023-01975-y 2023

  5. [5]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2023-0126

    Lustig, E.et al.Time-refraction optics with single cycle modulation.Nanophotonics12, 2221 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2023-0126

    work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2023-0126 2023

  6. [6]

    R., Halevi, P

    Zurita-S´ anchez, J. R., Halevi, P. & Cervantes-Gonz´ alez, J. C. Reflection and transmission of a wave incident on a slab with a time-periodic dielectric functionε(t).Phys. Rev. A79, 053821 (2009). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.053821

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.79.053821 2009

  7. [7]

    & Segev, M

    Lyubarov, M., Lumer, Y., Dikopoltsev, A., Lustig, E., Sharabi, Y. & Segev, M. Amplified emission and lasing in photonic time crystals.Science377, 425 (2022). URL https://www. science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abo3324

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abo3324 2022

  8. [8]

    & Shalaev, V

    Shaltout, A., Kildishev, A. & Shalaev, V. Time-varying metasurfaces and lorentz non-reciprocity. Opt. Mater. Express5, 2459 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.5.002459

    work page doi:10.1364/ome.5.002459 2015

  9. [9]

    S., Mirmoosa, M

    Asadchy, V. S., Mirmoosa, M. S., D´ ıaz-Rubio, A., Fan, S. & Tretyakov, S. A. Tutorial on electromagnetic nonreciprocity and its origins.Proc. IEEE108, 1684 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    # S-matrixcolumn 𝐀!

    Amra, C., Passian, A., Tchamitchian, P., Ettorre, M., Alwakil, A., Zapien, J. A., Rouquette, P., Abautret, Y. & Zerrad, M. Linear-frequency conversion with time-varying metasurfaces.Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013002 (2024). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013002. 15 Eqs. (S5) and (S11) Eq. (S12) Eqs. (S13)—(S21) unit PW 𝐀!"# S-matrixcolumn 𝐀...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.013002 2024

  11. [11]

    & Segev, M

    Dikopoltsev, A., Sharabi, Y., Lyubarov, M., Lumer, Y., Tsesses, S., Lustig, E., Kaminer, I. & Segev, M. Light emission by free electrons in photonic time-crystals.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.119, e2119705119 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2119705119

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2119705119 2022

  12. [12]

    S., Asadchy, V

    Wang, X., Mirmoosa, M. S., Asadchy, V. S., Rockstuhl, C., Fan, S. & Tretyakov, S. A. Metasurface-based realization of photonic time crystals.Sci. Adv.9, eadg7541 (2023). URL http://science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adg7541

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg7541 2023

  13. [13]

    Reyes-Ayona, J. R. & Halevi, P. Observation of genuine wave vector (k orβ) gap in a dynamic transmission line and temporal photonic crystals.Appl. Phys. Lett.107, 074101 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4928659

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4928659 2015

  14. [14]

    & Shapiro, B

    Li, H., Yin, S., He, H., Xu, J., Al` u, A. & Shapiro, B. Stationary charge radiation in anisotropic photonic time crystals.Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 093803 (2023). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.130.093803

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    C., Vezzoli, S., Raziman, T

    Harwood, A. C., Vezzoli, S., Raziman, T. V., Hooper, C., Tirole, R., Wu, F., Maier, S. A., Pendry, J. B., Horsley, S. A. R. & Sapienza, R. Space-time optical diffraction from synthetic motion. Nat. Commun.16, 5147 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60159-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60159-9 2025

  16. [16]

    C., Vezzoli, S., Tirole, R., Al` u, A

    Galiffi, E., Harwood, A. C., Vezzoli, S., Tirole, R., Al` u, A. & Sapienza, R. Optical coherent perfect absorption and amplification in a time-varying medium.Nat. Photon.20, 163 (2026). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-025-01833-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-025-01833-8 2026

  17. [17]

    A., Ha, S

    Shilkin, D. A., Ha, S. T., Paniagua-Dom´ ınguez, R. & Kuznetsov, A. I. Ultrafast modulation of a nonlocal semiconductor metasurface under spatially selective optical pumping.Nano Letters 24, 14229 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03392

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03392 2024

  18. [18]

    & Engheta, N

    Liberal, I. & Engheta, N. Near-zero refractive index photonics.Nat. Photon.11, 149–158 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.13. 16

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.13 2017

  19. [19]

    & Segev, M

    Sharabi, Y., Dikopoltsev, A., Lustig, E., Lumer, Y. & Segev, M. Spatiotemporal photonic crystals.Optica9, 585 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.455672

    work page doi:10.1364/optica.455672 2022

  20. [20]

    Stefanou, I., Pantazopoulos, P. A. & Stefanou, N. Light scattering by a spherical particle with a time-periodic refractive index.J. Opt. Soc. Am. B38, 407 (2021). URL https://opg.optica. org/josab/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-38-2-407

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    S., Fan, S., Tretyakov, S

    Ptitcyn, G., Lamprianidis, A., Karamanos, T., Asadchy, V., Alaee, R., M¨ uller, M., Albooyeh, M., Mirmoosa, M. S., Fan, S., Tretyakov, S. & Rockstuhl, C. Floquet–mie theory for time-varying dispersive spheres.Laser Photonics Rev.17, 2100683 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1002/ lpor.202100683

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    & Manjavacas, A

    Liberal, I. & Manjavacas, A. Synthetic crystal rotation with spacetime metamaterials.Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 146903 (2026). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/39px-kg8b

    work page doi:10.1103/39px-kg8b 2026

  23. [23]

    & Fan, S

    Asadchy, V., Lamprianidis, A., Ptitcyn, G., Albooyeh, M., Rituraj, Karamanos, T., Alaee, R., Tretyakov, S., Rockstuhl, C. & Fan, S. Parametric mie resonances and directional amplification in time-modulated scatterers.Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 054065 (2022). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.054065

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.054065 2022

  24. [24]

    M., da Mota, A

    Sadafi, M. M., da Mota, A. F. & Mosallaei, H. Dynamic control of light scattering in a single particle enabled by time modulation.Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 101702 (2023). URL https://doi. org/10.1063/5.0145291

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0145291 2023

  25. [25]

    & Huidobro, P

    Verde, M. & Huidobro, P. A. Optical response by time-varying plasmonic nanoparticles.Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023073 (2026). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/l1xz-kz8w

    work page doi:10.1103/l1xz-kz8w 2026

  26. [26]

    & Rockstuhl, C

    Stefanou, N., Stefanou, I., Almpanis, E., Papanikolaou, N., Garg, P. & Rockstuhl, C. Light scattering by a periodically time-modulated object of arbitrary shape: the extended boundary condition method.J. Opt. Soc. Am. B40, 2842 (2023). URL https://opg.optica.org/josab/ abstract.cfm?URI=josab-40-11-2842

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    C., Gladyshev, S., Globosits, D., Rotter, S., Muljarov, E

    Valero, A. C., Gladyshev, S., Globosits, D., Rotter, S., Muljarov, E. A. & Weiss, T. Revealing the resonant physics of open photonic time crystals.Laser Photonic Rev.e71318 (2026). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/lpor.71318

    work page doi:10.1002/lpor.71318 2026

  28. [28]

    & Rotter, S

    Globosits, D., H¨ upfl, J. & Rotter, S. Pseudounitary floquet scattering matrix for wave-front shaping in time-periodic photonic media.Phys. Rev. A110, 053515 (2024). URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.053515

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.110.053515 2024

  29. [29]

    A., Castaldi, G., Contestabile, A., Galdi, V

    Rizza, C., Vincenti, M. A., Castaldi, G., Contestabile, A., Galdi, V. & Scalora, M. Harnessing the natural resonances of time-varying dispersive interfaces.Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 186902 (2024). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.186902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.186902 2024

  30. [30]

    G., Beutel, D., Karamanos, T., Verf¨ urth, B

    Garg, P., Lamprianidis, A. G., Beutel, D., Karamanos, T., Verf¨ urth, B. & Rockstuhl, C. Modeling four-dimensional metamaterials: a t-matrix approach to describe time-varying metasurfaces.Opt. Express30, 45832 (2022). URL https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-30-25-45832

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Photonic time crystals assisted by quasi-bound states in the continuum

    Garg, P., Almpanis, E., Zimmer, L., Fischbach, J. D., Wang, X., Mirmoosa, M. S., Nyman, M., Stefanou, N., Papanikolaou, N., Asadchy, V. & Rockstuhl, C. Photonic time crystals assisted by quasi-bound states in the continuum.Sci. Adv., accepted(2026). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2507.15644

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    & Stefanou, N

    Panagiotidis, E., Almpanis, E., Papanikolaou, N. & Stefanou, N. Optical transitions and nonre- ciprocity in spatio-temporally periodic layers of spherical particles.Adv. Opt. Mater.11, 2202812 (2023). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adom.202202812

    work page doi:10.1002/adom.202202812 2023

  33. [33]

    S., Lamprianidis, A

    Wang, X., Garg, P., Mirmoosa, M. S., Lamprianidis, A. G., Rockstuhl, C. & Asadchy, V. S. Expanding momentum bandgaps in photonic time crystals through resonances.Nat. Photon. 19, 149 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-024-01563-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01563-3 2025

  34. [34]

    R., Sol´ ıs, D

    Blanco de Paz, M., Deop-Ruano, J. R., Sol´ ıs, D. M. & Manjavacas, A. Lattice resonances in periodic arrays of time-modulated scatterers.Laser & Photonics Reviewse03171 (2026). URL 17 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/lpor.202503171

    work page doi:10.1002/lpor.202503171 2026

  35. [35]

    Generation and Enhancement of Persistent Nanoscale Magnetization in All-Dielectric Metasurfaces by Optically Injected and Localized Free Carriers

    Rawat, S., Mukherjee, S. & Shvets, G. Generation and enhancement of persistent nanoscale mag- netization in all-dielectric metasurfaces by optically injected and localized free carriers (2026). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11003. 2601.11003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    W., Zhen, B., Stone, A

    Hsu, C. W., Zhen, B., Stone, A. D., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Soljaˇ ci´ c, M. Bound states in the continuum.Nat. Rev. Mater.1, 16048 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.48

    work page doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.48 2016

  37. [37]

    & Kivshar, Y

    Koshelev, K., Lepeshov, S., Liu, M., Bogdanov, A. & Kivshar, Y. Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-qresonances governed by bound states in the continuum.Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 193903 (2018). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.193903

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.193903 2018

  38. [38]

    Thapa, D. K. & Biswas, S. Leveraging bound states in the continuum for advanced ultra- sensitive sensing technologies.Mater. Horiz.12, 5096 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1039/ D5MH00413F

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    & Liu, J

    Ren, Y., Li, P., Liu, Z., Chen, Z., Chen, Y.-L., Peng, C. & Liu, J. Low-threshold nanolasers based on miniaturized bound states in the continuum.Sci. Adv.8, eade8817 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ade8817

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.ade8817 2022

  40. [40]

    & Kivshar, Y

    Vabishchevich, P. & Kivshar, Y. Nonlinear photonics with metasurfaces.Photon. Res.11, B50 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.474387

    work page doi:10.1364/prj.474387 2023

  41. [41]

    Kang, M., Liu, T., Chan, C. T. & Xiao, M. Applications of bound states in the continuum in photonics.Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 659 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00642-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00642-8 2023

  42. [42]

    & Monticone, F

    Hayran, Z. & Monticone, F. Capturing broadband light in a compact bound state in the con- tinuum.ACS Photonics8, 813 (2021). URL https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsphotonics. 0c01696

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics 2021

  43. [43]

    L., Sadrieva, Z

    Koshelev, K. L., Sadrieva, Z. F., Shcherbakov, A. A., Kivshar, Y. S. & Bogdanov, A. A. Bound states in the continuum in photonic structures.Phys.-Usp93, 528 (2023). URL https://doi.org/ 10.3367/UFNe.2021.12.039120

    work page doi:10.3367/ufne.2021.12.039120 2023

  44. [44]

    D., Lamprianidis, A

    Garg, P., Fischbach, J. D., Lamprianidis, A. G., Wang, X., Mirmoosa, M. S., Asadchy, V. S., Rockstuhl, C. & Sturges, T. J. Inverse-designed dispersive time-varying nanostructures.Adv. Opt. Mater.13, 2402444 (2025). URL https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1002/adom.202402444

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    B., Dinani, H

    Sedeh, H. B., Dinani, H. M. & Mosallaei, H. Optical nonreciprocity via transmissive time- modulated metasurfaces.Nanophotonics11, 4135 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1515/ nanoph-2022-0373

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    L., Marini, A

    Ramaccia, D., Sounas, D. L., Marini, A. V., Toscano, A. & Bilotti, F. Electromagnetic isolation induced by time-varying metasurfaces: Nonreciprocal bragg grating.IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett.19, 1886 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2020.2996275

    work page doi:10.1109/lawp.2020.2996275 2020

  47. [47]

    Matrix formulation of electromagnetic scattering.Proc

    Waterman, P. Matrix formulation of electromagnetic scattering.Proc. IEEE53, 805 (1965). URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1445988/

    work page arXiv 1965

  48. [48]

    & Al´ u, A

    Krasnok, A., Baranov, D., Li, H., Miri, M.-A., Monticone, F. & Al´ u, A. Anomalies in light scattering.Adv. Opt. Photon.11, 892 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.11.000892

    work page doi:10.1364/aop.11.000892 2019

  49. [49]

    Ewald, P. P. Die berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer gitterpotentiale.Ann. Phys.369, 253 (1921). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.19213690304

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19213690304 1921

  50. [50]

    & Fernandez-Corbaton, I

    Beutel, D., Groner, A., Rockstuhl, C. & Fernandez-Corbaton, I. Efficient simulation of biperiodic, layered structures based on the t-matrix method.J. Opt. Soc. Am. B38, 1782 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.419645

    work page doi:10.1364/josab.419645 2021

  51. [51]

    & Rockstuhl, C

    Beutel, D., Fernandez-Corbaton, I. & Rockstuhl, C. treams – a t-matrix-based scattering code for nanophotonics.Comput. Phys. Commun.297, 109076 (2024). URL https://www.sciencedirect. 18 com/science/article/pii/S0010465523004216

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Cruzan, O. R. Translational addition theorems for spherical vector wave functions.Q. Appl. Math.20, 33 (1962). URL https://www.jstor.org/stable/43636359

    work page arXiv 1962

  53. [53]

    Addition theorems for spherical wave functions.Q

    Stein, S. Addition theorems for spherical wave functions.Q. Appl. Math.19, 15 (1961). URL https://www.jstor.org/stable/43634833?seq=1

    work page arXiv 1961

  54. [54]

    Symmetry relations of the translation coefficients of the spherical scalar and vec- tor multipole fields.Prog

    Kim, K. Symmetry relations of the translation coefficients of the spherical scalar and vec- tor multipole fields.Prog. Electromagn. Res.48, 45 (2004). URL https://doi.org/10.2528/ PIER04040601

    work page 2004

  55. [55]

    C., Weiss, T., Rockstuhl, C

    Globosits, D., Garg, P., H¨ upfl, J., Valero, A. C., Weiss, T., Rockstuhl, C. & Rotter, S. Exceptional points, lasing, and coherent perfect absorption in floquet scattering systems.Light Sci. Appl., accepted(2026). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03133

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    A., Shalin, A

    Novitsky, A., Lyakhov, D., Michels, D., Pavlov, A. A., Shalin, A. S. & Novitsky, D. V. Unam- biguous scattering matrix for non-Hermitian systems.Phys. Rev. A101, 043834 (2020). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.043834

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.101.043834 2020

  57. [57]

    Inequalities for a matrix riccati equation.J

    Redheffer, R. Inequalities for a matrix riccati equation.J. Math. Mech.8, 349 (1959). URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/24900576

    work page arXiv 1959

  58. [58]

    Rumpf, R. C. Improved formulation of scattering matrices for semi-analytical methods that is consistent with convention.Prog. Electromagn. Res. B35, 241 (2011). URL https://doi.org/10. 2528/PIERB11083107

    work page 2011

  59. [59]

    & Modinos, A

    Stefanou, N., Yannopapas, V. & Modinos, A. Multem 2: A new version of the program for transmission and band-structure calculations of photonic crystals.Comput. Phys. Commun. 132, 189 (2000). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(00)00131-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(00)00131-4 2000

  60. [60]

    & Modinos, A

    Stefanou, N., Yannopapas, V. & Modinos, A. Heterostructures of photonic crystals: frequency bands and transmission coefficients.Comput. Phys. Commun.113, 49 (1998). URL https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(98)00060-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(98)00060-5 1998

  61. [61]

    Alagappan, G., Garc´ ıa-Vidal, F. J. & Png, C. E. Fabry-perot resonances in bilayer metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 226901 (2024). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133. 226901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133 2024

  62. [62]

    & Rockstuhl, C

    Ustimenko, N., Fernandez-Corbaton, I. & Rockstuhl, C. Singular value decomposition to describe bound states in the continuum in periodic metasurfaces (2026). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2602.15741. 2602.15741

    work page arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    V., Zhao, Z., Proskurin, A., Song, M., Liu, X., Rybin, M

    Semushev, K. V., Zhao, Z., Proskurin, A., Song, M., Liu, X., Rybin, M. V., Maslova, E. E. & Bog- danov, A. A. Robustness of bound states in the continuum in bilayer structures against symmetry breaking.Phys. Rev. Appl.25, 014038 (2026). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/qj87-5xz9

    work page doi:10.1103/qj87-5xz9 2026

  64. [64]

    A., Othman, N., Bait-Suwailamn, M

    Amer, A. A., Othman, N., Bait-Suwailamn, M. M., Sapuan, S. Z., Salem, A. A. & Salh, A. Polarization-insensitive, high-efficiency metasurface with wide reception angle for energy harvesting applications.Sensors25, 429 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.3390/s25020429

    work page doi:10.3390/s25020429 2025

  65. [65]

    & Evlyukhin, A

    Ustimenko, N., Rockstuhl, C. & Evlyukhin, A. B. Resonances in finite-size all-dielectric meta- surfaces for light trapping and propagation control.Phys. Rev. B109, 115436 (2024). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.115436

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.115436 2024

  66. [66]

    Sounas, D. L. & Al` u, A. Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation.Nat. Photon.11, 774 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-017-0051-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-017-0051-x 2017

  67. [67]

    Song, Q., Hu, J., Dai, S., Zheng, C., Han, D., Zi, J., Zhang, Z. Q. & Chan, C. T. Coexistence of a new type of bound state in the continuum and a lasing threshold mode induced by pt symmetry. Sci. Adv.6, eabc1160 (2026). URL https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc1160. 19

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc1160 2026

  68. [68]

    & Wang, A

    Mistiri, F. & Wang, A. P. The star-product and its algebraic properties.Journal of the Franklin Institute321, 21 (1986). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-0032(86)90053-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0016-0032(86)90053-0 1986

  69. [69]

    Effects due to generation of negative frequencies during temporal diffraction

    Hendry, E., Hooper, C. M., Wardley, W. P. & Horsley, S. A. R. Effects due to generation of negative frequencies during temporal diffraction (2025). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03491. 2507.03491. 20

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025