Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 61 references

A short electric pulse permanently restructures the shear of a cyclotron trajectory bundle, encoding memory without changing focusing times.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 06:30 UTC pith:FFGO2TU3

load-bearing objection Clean application of classical ESR kinematics to a known cyclotron pulse memory; shear carries a permanent phase rotation while focusing does not, under idealized rectangular homogeneous E. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.06594 v1 pith:FFGO2TU3 submitted 2026-07-06 physics.class-ph

Memory-like effects and kinematics of trajectories in Cyclotron motion

Manthan Kashyap Datta , Mantra Mehta , Sayan Das This is my paper
classification physics.class-ph PACS 41.75.-i45.50.Dd03.50.De
keywords cyclotron motionmemory effecttrajectory congruenceexpansion-shear-rotationelectromagnetic memorycomplex sheardynamical phasegauge transformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks how a brief electric pulse leaves a lasting geometric mark on a bundle of charged particles that are already circling in a uniform magnetic field. Using the expansion, shear, and rotation variables that describe how nearby trajectories diverge, distort, and twist, the authors show that the pulse does not alter the times at which the trajectories focus. Instead it permanently rewrites the shear components: after the pulse is gone, the shear vector is rotated relative to its pre-pulse state by a dynamical phase set by the integrated pulse strength. Analytic solutions matched across the three time regions (before, during, and after the pulse) together with rational-trigonometric regression on the shear data confirm that this restructuring is exact and measurable. A sympathetic reader cares because the same geometric language that has been used for gravitational memory now yields a concrete, laboratory-accessible electromagnetic analogue whose signature lives in the beam envelope rather than in focusing caustics.

Core claim

The geometric imprint of a short electric pulse on a congruence of cyclotron trajectories survives after the pulse vanishes and is carried entirely by a permanent restructuring of the shear components. Explicitly, the complex shear transforms as Σ_after(t) = Σ_before(t) e^{i θ_D}, where the dynamical phase θ_D is proportional to the integrated electric-field strength and equals the oriented area swept by the guiding-center displacement. Expansion and rotation are essentially unaffected, so focusing times remain unchanged; the memory resides only in the shear sector and is equivalent to a large gauge transformation of the vector potential.

What carries the argument

The ESR (expansion-shear-rotation) decomposition of the velocity-gradient tensor for a two-dimensional trajectory congruence, specialized to pure magnetic cyclotron motion and matched across a rectangular electric pulse. The complex shear Σ = σ_{+} + i σ× then evolves by a pure phase rotation once the pulse ends.

Load-bearing premise

The electric pulse is taken to be perfectly uniform in space and strictly rectangular in time, so that its only lasting effect is a pure guiding-center drift that can be absorbed into a single dynamical phase.

What would settle it

In a low-energy cyclotron or modified Penning trap, prepare a localized bunch with known initial ESR values, apply a single timed transverse electric pulse, and stroboscopically record the beam's transverse aspect ratio and orientation once per cyclotron period before and after the pulse; extract the denominator constants C and D of the rational-trigonometric shear fit in each region. Absence of the predicted permanent shift (C,D)_I o (C,D)_III, or appearance of an expansion-driven change in focusing time, would falsify the claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Memory of a transient electric kick can be read out from beam-envelope ellipticity and orientation rather than from focal-plane locations.
  • The same shear-phase diagnostic can be used to program or detect caustics by deliberately tuning the initial invariant I across zero.
  • Electromagnetic memory in cyclotron systems appears as a permanent phase-space timing shift, the direct analogue of gravitational velocity memory.
  • Large gauge transformations generated by the pulse become experimentally accessible through the measurable rotation of the shear vector.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the pulse acquires a mild spatial gradient, residual expansion terms should appear; their absence or presence would cleanly separate pure shear memory from focusing memory.
  • The quarter-period phase lock between σ_{+} and σ× that survives the pulse offers a continuous, non-destructive monitor of beam health in storage rings.
  • Extending the congruence analysis to relativistic cyclotron orbits would test whether the same dynamical-phase memory persists when radiation reaction is non-negligible.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a congruence of charged-particle trajectories in a uniform magnetic field subjected to a short, spatially homogeneous rectangular electric pulse. Using the two-dimensional ESR (expansion–shear–rotation) formalism of classical trajectory congruences, the authors solve the Raychaudhuri-type equations in the three temporal regions (pre-pulse, during-pulse, post-pulse) for the three signs of the invariant I = σ₊^{2} + σ×^{2} − ω̄^{2}. They show that the focusing time of the pure-magnetic congruence is unaffected by the pulse history once the kinematic initial data at the start of each region are fixed, while the complex shear Σ = σ₊ + i σ× acquires a permanent phase rotation Σ_after(t) = Σ_before(t) e^{i θ_D}, where the dynamical phase θ_D is proportional to the integrated pulse strength and is equivalent to a large gauge transformation of the vector potential. Analytic solutions are supplemented by rational-trigonometric regression on synthetic data that recovers R^{2} = 1 when no focusing singularity lies inside the fitting window, and by a discussion of possible laboratory signatures in beam-envelope observables.

Significance. If the derivation holds under the stated idealizations, the work supplies a clean classical-mechanical illustration of a memory-like effect that is carried by shear rather than by focusing, thereby complementing the gravitational-wave and electromagnetic-memory literature. The closed-form ESR solutions for pure cyclotron motion, the explicit map from guiding-center drift to a dynamical phase, and the regression verification of the analytic constants are concrete, reproducible contributions. The proposed experimental translation (turn-by-turn aspect-ratio and orientation measurements in a Penning trap or storage ring) is falsifiable and therefore useful even if the idealized rectangular-pulse assumption must later be relaxed.

major comments (2)
  1. Section V.A–B and Eqs. (52)–(55): the identification Σ_after = Σ_before e^{i θ_D} is derived under the assumption that the pulse leaves the denominator D(t) (and therefore the invariant I and the expansion) unchanged up to a redefinition of constants. While this is correct for a spatially homogeneous rectangular pulse, the manuscript never demonstrates that the same phase-only restructuring survives when the electric field has a realistic spatial gradient or a non-rectangular envelope. A short calculation or numerical example with a smooth, localized pulse would establish whether the memory remains purely shear-phase or acquires additional expansion/shear source terms; without it the central claim is limited to an idealized model that the authors themselves flag but do not stress-test.
  2. Section IV.B and Figs. 9–11: the regression analysis is performed exclusively on synthetic data generated from the same closed-form solutions that are being verified. Consequently R^{2} = 1 (or catastrophic failure at a known singularity) is a consistency check rather than an independent validation. The experimental proposal in the same subsection is therefore essential; the manuscript should either (i) supply a concrete numerical protocol that could be applied to real beam-profile data or (ii) clearly label the regression as a self-consistency diagnostic so that readers do not over-interpret its confirmatory power.
minor comments (5)
  1. Eqs. (31)–(38): the constants C, D, E, F, G are written with slightly different normalizations for I > 0 and I < 0; a single table collecting all three cases would improve readability.
  2. Figure 8 caption and surrounding text: the claimed interchange “σ₊ (Region I) ~ σ× (Region III) with a sign flip” is visible by eye but never quantified; a short statement of the residual phase offset after the pulse would make the visual claim precise.
  3. Section III.A: the redefinition ω̄ = ω − ω_c/2 is introduced without a sentence explaining why the cyclotron contribution is subtracted; a one-line remark would help non-specialist readers.
  4. References: the arXiv preprint [50] that first noted the single-particle memory-like effect is cited, but a brief comparison of the single-particle versus congruence viewpoints would clarify the incremental contribution of the present work.
  5. Typographical: “amemory-likeobservable” (p. 3), “eletric” (p. 3), and occasional missing spaces around equation numbers should be corrected.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: analytic ESR solutions and dynamical-phase rotation of complex shear follow from Lorentz force + velocity-gradient definitions; regression is a consistency check on synthetic data generated from those same closed forms.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. II (ESR setup) and Sec. IV B (regression)]
    "the formalism developed in [48], especially for classical dynamics, offers a systematic framework… To rigorously verify that the numerically computed shear variables σ_{+} and σ imes are consistent with the analytic ESR solution, we employ a rational-trigonometric regression model."

    The kinematic decomposition and Raychaudhuri-type equations are taken from the authors’ prior ESR paper [48]. The regression is then run on synthetic data generated from the closed-form solutions of those same equations, so the perfect R^{2} merely reconfirms the analytic expressions already used to produce the data. The circularity is minor: the memory claim itself (phase rotation of Σ) is derived independently from the Lorentz force and does not rest on the regression.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The ESR evolution equations (9–12) and their pure-magnetic specializations (27–30) are obtained from the convective derivative of the velocity-gradient tensor B^i_j = abla_j u^i together with the Lorentz force; the three closed-form solution families (31, 34, 36) follow by direct integration once the invariant I is fixed. The pulse enters only by resetting the initial data at the boundaries of Region II; the post-pulse complex shear is then shown to equal the pre-pulse shear multiplied by a pure phase e^{i heta_D} whose value is computed from the guiding-center drift (52–55). That identity is an algebraic consequence of the solutions, not an input. The rational-trigonometric regression is performed on synthetic trajectories generated from the same closed forms and is therefore a numerical consistency check (R^{2} = 1 when no singularity lies inside the window), not an independent prediction. Self-citations to the ESR framework [48] and to Kar’s single-particle memory paper [50] supply the geometric language and the single-orbit observation, but the multi-trajectory calculation and the shear-phase result are derived afresh. No fitted parameter is later re-labeled a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported to forbid alternatives. Score 1 reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing self-citation of the ESR setup.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard classical electrodynamics (Lorentz force, uniform B, rectangular E pulse) plus the kinematic decomposition of the velocity-gradient tensor into expansion, shear and rotation. No free parameters are fitted to external data; the constants C, D, E, F, G are fixed by initial conditions. The only invented packaging is the complex shear Σ and the dynamical phase heta_D, both of which are redefinitions of already-derived quantities.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Lorentz force law for a charged particle in uniform B and a spatially homogeneous rectangular E pulse (Eqs. 22–26).
    Standard classical electrodynamics; the rectangular homogeneous idealization is stated explicitly and is load-bearing for the pure-drift memory.
  • standard math Decomposition of the velocity-gradient tensor B^i_j into expansion, shear and rotation (Eqs. 4–8) and the resulting classical Raychaudhuri system (Eqs. 9–12).
    Taken from the prior ESR literature (Shaikh et al. 2014); mathematically standard once the Euclidean metric is chosen.
  • standard math The invariant I = σ₊^{2} + σ×^{2} − ω̄^{2} controls focusing and remains constant in pure magnetic field.
    Direct consequence of the evolution equations when the electric field vanishes.
invented entities (1)
  • complex shear Σ = σ₊ + i σ× and dynamical phase heta_D no independent evidence
    purpose: Package the permanent shear restructuring as a pure phase rotation Σ_after = Σ_before e^{i heta_D} linked to a large gauge transformation.
    Both quantities are linear combinations or integrals of already-derived fields; they do not introduce new physical degrees of freedom.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 21284 in / 2756 out tokens · 19791 ms · 2026-07-11T06:30:55.222358+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the collective dynamics of a bundle of charged particles undergoing cyclotron motion in a uniform magnetic field when subjected to a short-duration electric pulse. Using the geometric framework based on the evolution of trajectory congruences, we analyze how the pulse affects the expansion, shear, and rotation of a small family of trajectories. We show that the geometric imprint persists after the pulse has vanished, manifesting as a memory of the transient perturbation. Unlike gravitational memory effects, this does not manifest itself in focusing behaviour of the trajectories, and instead implies a restructuring of the shear component before and after the pulse. We offer direct analytic and regression based arguments for the same.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06594 by Manthan Kashyap Datta, Mantra Mehta, Sayan Das.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_12.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Case 1:I >0 The solutions for ESR variables in this case reads: θ(t) = ωc √ 1 +C 2 cos(ωct+D) C+ √ 1 +C 2 sin(ωct+D) , σ+(t) = Esin(ω ct) +Fcos(ω ct) C+ √ 1 +C 2 sin(ωct+D) , σ×(t) = Ecos(ω ct)−Fsin(ω ct) C+ √ 1 +C 2 sin(ωct+D) , ω(t) = ωc 2 + G C+ √ 1 +C 2 sin(ωct+D) ,(31) 11 with constants depending on initial values: C= √I0 ωc −1 + θ2 0 4I0 + ω2 c 4I0 ...

  2. [2]

    Thus, focusing occurs at finite time for the marginal case as well

    Case 2:I= 0 In this case, solutions are: θ(t) =ω c tan ωc C− t 2 , σ+(t) = sec2 ωc C− t 2 Esin(ω ct) +Fcos(ω ct) , σ×(t) = sec2 ωc C− t 2 Ecos(ω ct)−Fsin(ω ct) , ω(t) = ωc 2 +Gsec 2 ωc C− t 2 ,(34) where C= 1 ωc tan−1 θ0 ωc ,{E, F, G}= {σ+0, σ ×0, ω 0 −ω c/2} 1 + (θ0/ωc)2 .(35) These functions diverge at a time when tf = 2C+ (2n+ 1)π ωc , n∈Z. Thus, focus...

  3. [3]

    Therefore, the denominator of ESR variables never vanish, and the trajectories never meet at a finite time

    Case 3:I <0 Solutions in this case mirrors the ones in the Case 1, with some juxtaposition: θ(t) = ωcCcos(ω ct+D)√ 1 +C 2 +Csin(ω ct+D) , σ+(t) = Esin(ω ct) +Fcos(ω ct)√ 1 +C 2 +Csin(ω ct+D) , σ×(t) = Ecos(ω ct)−Fsin(ω ct)√ 1 +C 2 +Csin(ω ct+D) , ω(t) = ωc 2 + G√ 1 +C 2 +Csin(ω ct+D) ,(36) However with some different constants: C= s − I0 ω2c 1− θ2 0 4I0 −...

  4. [4]

    The electric pulse thus influences the focusing time only indirectly, through its effect on the initial values at the moment of injection

    This universality means that, once the initial kinematic variables are fixed, the subsequent focusing behavior depends only on the magnetic field strength, not on the detailed history of how those initial conditions were produced. The electric pulse thus influences the focusing time only indirectly, through its effect on the initial values at the moment o...

  5. [5]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and A. G. Polnarev. Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars. Sov. Astron., 18:17, 1974

    1974

  6. [6]

    V. B. Braginsky and L. P. Grishchuk. Kinematic Resonance and Memory Effect in Free Mass Gravitational Antennas.Sov. Phys. JETP, 62:427–430, 1985

    1985

  7. [7]

    Christodoulou

    D. Christodoulou. Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments.Phys. Rev. Lett., 67:1486–1489, 1991

    1991

  8. [8]

    Perturbative and gauge invariant treatment of gravitational wave memory

    Lydia Bieri and David Garfinkle. Perturbative and gauge invariant treatment of gravitational wave memory. Phys. Rev. D, 89:084039, Apr 2014

    2014

  9. [9]

    Alexander Tolish, Lydia Bieri, David Garfinkle, and Robert M. Wald. Examination of a simple example of gravitational wave memory.Phys. Rev. D, 90:044060, Aug 2014

    2014

  10. [10]

    Alexander Tolish and Robert M. Wald. Retarded Fields of Null Particles and the Memory Effect.Phys. Rev. D, 89(6):064008, 2014

    2014

  11. [11]

    The sky pattern of the linearized gravitational memory effect.Class

    Thomas M¨ adler and Jeffrey Winicour. The sky pattern of the linearized gravitational memory effect.Class. Quant. Grav., 33(17):175006, 2016

    2016

  12. [12]

    Radiation Memory, Boosted Schwarzschild Spacetimes and Super- translations.Class

    Thomas M¨ adler and Jeffrey Winicour. Radiation Memory, Boosted Schwarzschild Spacetimes and Super- translations.Class. Quant. Grav., 34(11):115009, 2017

    2017

  13. [13]

    Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems.JHEP, 01:086, 2016

    Andrew Strominger and Alexander Zhiboedov. Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems.JHEP, 01:086, 2016

    2016

  14. [14]

    Princeton University Press, 2018

    Andrew Strominger.Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory. Princeton University Press, 2018. 29

    2018

  15. [15]

    M Zhang, C

    P. M Zhang, C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, and P. A. Horvathy. The Memory Effect for Plane Gravitational Waves.Phys. Lett. B, 772:743–746, 2017

    2017

  16. [16]

    P. M. Zhang, C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, and P. A. Horvathy. Soft gravitons and the memory effect for plane gravitational waves.Phys. Rev. D, 96(6):064013, 2017

    2017

  17. [17]

    P. M. Zhang, C. Duval, and P. A. Horvathy. Memory effect for impulsive gravitational waves.Class. Quant. Grav., 35(6):065011, 2018

    2018

  18. [18]

    P. M. Zhang, C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, and P. A. Horvathy. Velocity Memory Effect for Polarized Gravitational Waves.JCAP, 05:030, 2018

    2018

  19. [19]

    P. M. Zhang, M. Elbistan, G. W. Gibbons, and P. A. Horvathy. Sturm–Liouville and Carroll: at the heart of the memory effect.Gen. Rel. Grav., 50(9):107, 2018

    2018

  20. [20]

    Graham M. Shore. Memory, Penrose Limits and the Geometry of Gravitational Shockwaves and Gyratons. JHEP, 12:133, 2018

    2018

  21. [21]

    Flanagan, Alexander M

    ´Eanna ´E. Flanagan, Alexander M. Grant, Abraham I. Harte, and David A. Nichols. Persistent gravitational wave observables: Nonlinear plane wave spacetimes.Phys. Rev. D, 101(10):104033, 2020

    2020

  22. [22]

    Geodesic congruences, impulsive gravitational waves and gravitational memory.Phys

    Martin O’Loughlin and Hovhannes Demirchian. Geodesic congruences, impulsive gravitational waves and gravitational memory.Phys. Rev. D, 99(2):024031, 2019

    2019

  23. [23]

    Geodesic congruences in exact plane wave spacetimes and the memory effect.Phys

    Indranil Chakraborty and Sayan Kar. Geodesic congruences in exact plane wave spacetimes and the memory effect.Phys. Rev. D, 101(6):064022, 2020

    2020

  24. [24]

    Memory effects in Kundt wave spacetimes.Phys

    Indranil Chakraborty and Sayan Kar. Memory effects in Kundt wave spacetimes.Phys. Lett. B, 808:135611, 2020

    2020

  25. [25]

    Kundt geometries and memory effects in the Brans-Dicke theory of gravity.Eur

    Siddhant Siddhant, Indranil Chakraborty, and Sayan Kar. Kundt geometries and memory effects in the Brans-Dicke theory of gravity.Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(4):350, 2021

    2021

  26. [26]

    Divakarla and Bernard F

    Atul K. Divakarla and Bernard F. Whiting. First-order velocity memory effect from compact binary coalescing sources.Phys. Rev. D, 104(6):064001, 2021

    2021

  27. [27]

    A simple analytic example of the gravitational wave memory effect

    Indranil Chakraborty and Sayan Kar. A simple analytic example of the gravitational wave memory effect. The European Physical Journal Plus, 137(4):1–14, 2022

    2022

  28. [28]

    Memory effect of the pp waves with torsion.Eur

    Branislav Cvetkovi´ c and Dejan Simi´ c. Memory effect of the pp waves with torsion.Eur. Phys. J. C, 82(2):127, 2022

    2022

  29. [29]

    Grant and David A

    Alexander M. Grant and David A. Nichols. Persistent gravitational wave observables: Curve deviation in asymptotically flat spacetimes.Phys. Rev. D, 105(2):024056, 2022. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 107, 109902 (2023)]

    2022

  30. [30]

    P. M. Zhang and P. A. Horvathy. Displacement within velocity effect in gravitational wave memory.Annals Phys., 470:169784, 2024

    2024

  31. [31]

    Displacement versus velocity memory effects from a gravita- tional plane wave.JCAP, 08:004, 2024

    Jibril Ben Achour and Jean-Philippe Uzan. Displacement versus velocity memory effects from a gravita- tional plane wave.JCAP, 08:004, 2024

    2024

  32. [32]

    Hadi, Amin Rezaei Akbarieh, and David F

    H. Hadi, Amin Rezaei Akbarieh, and David F. Mota. Gravitational wave pulse and memory effects for hairy Kiselev black hole and its analogy with Bondi–Sachs formalism.Class. Quant. Grav., 41(10):105005, 2024

    2024

  33. [33]

    P. M. Zhang, Q. L. Zhao, J. Balog, and P. A. Horvathy. Displacement memory for flyby.Annals Phys., 30 473:169890, 2025

    2025

  34. [34]

    Frequency space derivation of linear and nonlinear memory gravitational wave signals from eccentric binary orbits.Phys

    Arpan Hait, Subhendra Mohanty, and Suraj Prakash. Frequency space derivation of linear and nonlinear memory gravitational wave signals from eccentric binary orbits.Phys. Rev. D, 109(8):084037, 2024

    2024

  35. [35]

    The curious case of parabolic encounters: gravitational waves with linear & non-linear memory

    Samik Dutta, Ankur Chhabra, Aritra Banerjee, Sajal Mukherjee, and Subhendra Mohanty. The curious case of parabolic encounters: gravitational waves with linear & non-linear memory. 11 2025

    2025

  36. [36]

    The gravitational-wave memory effect.Class

    Marc Favata. The gravitational-wave memory effect.Class. Quant. Grav., 27:084036, 2010

    2010

  37. [37]

    A review of gravitational memory and BMS frame fixing in numerical relativity.Class

    Keefe Mitman et al. A review of gravitational memory and BMS frame fixing in numerical relativity.Class. Quant. Grav., 41(22):223001, 2024

    2024

  38. [38]

    Gravitational Waves from a Quantum Field Theory Perspective

    Subhendra Mohanty. Gravitational Waves from a Quantum Field Theory Perspective. 12 2022

    2022

  39. [39]

    Enhancement of electromagnetic memory effects.Phys

    Jann Zosso. Enhancement of electromagnetic memory effects.Phys. Rev. Lett., 135:201602, Nov 2025

    2025

  40. [40]

    L. P. Grishchuk and A. G. Polnarev. Gravitational wave pulses with ’velocity coded memory.’.Sov. Phys. JETP, 69:653–657, 1989

    1989

  41. [41]

    An electromagnetic analogue of gravitational wave memory.Class

    Lydia Bieri and David Garfinkle. An electromagnetic analogue of gravitational wave memory.Class. Quant. Grav., 30:195009, 2013

    2013

  42. [42]

    Winicour

    J. Winicour. Global aspects of radiation memory.Class. Quant. Grav., 31:205003, 2014

    2014

  43. [43]

    Asymptotic Symmetries and Electromagnetic Memory.JHEP, 09:154, 2017

    Sabrina Pasterski. Asymptotic Symmetries and Electromagnetic Memory.JHEP, 09:154, 2017

    2017

  44. [44]

    Electromagnetic Duality and the Electric Memory Effect

    Yuta Hamada, Min-Seok Seo, and Gary Shiu. Electromagnetic Duality and the Electric Memory Effect. JHEP, 02:046, 2018

    2018

  45. [45]

    Gravitational wave memory and the wave equation.Class

    David Garfinkle. Gravitational wave memory and the wave equation.Class. Quant. Grav., 39(13):135010, 2022

    2022

  46. [46]

    An experiment to measure electromagnetic memory.Class

    Lydia Bieri and David Garfinkle. An experiment to measure electromagnetic memory.Class. Quant. Grav., 41(22):225009, 2024

    2024

  47. [47]

    Relativistic cosmology

    Amalkumar Raychaudhuri. Relativistic cosmology. i.Phys. Rev., 98:1123–1126, May 1955

    1955

  48. [48]

    Hawking and George F

    Stephen W. Hawking and George F. R. Ellis.The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2 2023

    2023

  49. [49]

    The Raychaudhuri equations: A Brief review.Pramana, 69:49, 2007

    Sayan Kar and Soumitra SenGupta. The Raychaudhuri equations: A Brief review.Pramana, 69:49, 2007

    2007

  50. [50]

    Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities.Phys

    Roger Penrose. Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities.Phys. Rev. Lett., 14:57–59, 1965

    1965

  51. [51]

    S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose. The Singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 314:529–548, 1970

    1970

  52. [52]

    Kinematics of trajectories in classical mechanics.The European Physical Journal Plus, 129(5):90, 2014

    Rajibul Shaikh, Sayan Kar, and Anirvan DasGupta. Kinematics of trajectories in classical mechanics.The European Physical Journal Plus, 129(5):90, 2014

    2014

  53. [53]

    Evolution of geodesic congruences in a gravitationally collapsing scalar field background.Phys

    Rajibul Shaikh, Sayan Kar, and Anirvan DasGupta. Evolution of geodesic congruences in a gravitationally collapsing scalar field background.Phys. Rev. D, 90(12):124069, 2014

    2014

  54. [54]

    Pulse-induced memory-like effect in cyclotron motion?arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19460, 2024

    Sayan Kar. Pulse-induced memory-like effect in cyclotron motion?arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19460, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Harte, Thomas B

    Abraham I. Harte, Thomas B. Mieling, Marius A. Oancea, and Elisabeth Steininger. Gravitational wave memory and its effects on particles and fields.Phys. Rev. D, 111(2):024034, 2025

    2025

  56. [56]

    Cambridge University Press, 12 2009

    Eric Poisson.A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 12 2009

    2009

  57. [57]

    Kinematics of deformable media.Annals Phys., 31 323:1621–1643, 2008

    Anirvan Dasgupta, Hemwati Nandan, and Sayan Kar. Kinematics of deformable media.Annals Phys., 31 323:1621–1643, 2008

    2008

  58. [58]

    Kinematics of geodesic flows in stringy black hole backgrounds.Phys

    Anirvan Dasgupta, Hemwati Nandan, and Sayan Kar. Kinematics of geodesic flows in stringy black hole backgrounds.Phys. Rev. D, 79:124004, 2009

    2009

  59. [59]

    Kinematics of flows on curved, deformable media

    Anirvan Dasgupta, Hemwati Nandan, and Sayan Kar. Kinematics of flows on curved, deformable media. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 6:645–666, 2009. [Erratum: Int.J.Geom.Meth.Mod.Phys. 07, 517–518 (2010)]

    2009

  60. [60]

    Geodesic congruences in warped spacetimes.Phys

    Suman Ghosh, Anirvan Dasgupta, and Sayan Kar. Geodesic congruences in warped spacetimes.Phys. Rev. D, 83:084001, 2011

    2011

  61. [61]

    Geodesic flows in rotating black hole backgrounds

    Anirvan Dasgupta, Hemwati Nandan, and Sayan Kar. Geodesic flows in rotating black hole backgrounds. Phys. Rev. D, 85:104037, 2012

    2012