Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 44 references

CaH2 reduction converts bulk LiNbO3 crystals into superconducting LiNbO2 with Tc onset of 14.4 K.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 15:55 UTC pith:7QZLRIHQ

load-bearing objection First bulk LiNbO2 crystals via non-topotactic CaH2 reduction of LiNbO3; solid multi-probe evidence for ~14 K superconductivity and high Hc2, with only quantitative soft spots on Li stoichiometry and volume fraction. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.06819 v2 pith:7QZLRIHQ submitted 2026-07-07 cond-mat.supr-con

Synthesis of Bulk Superconducting LiNbO₂ Crystals through CaH₂ Reduction

Ryan Paxson , Stephanie J. Hong , Bicky S. Moirangthem , Parham Kabirifar , Saya Takeuchi , Tianyu Li , Chih-Yu Lee , Haotong Liang
show 10 more authors
Keenan Avers Kamal R. Joshi Amlan Datta Makariy A. Tanatar Shanta Saha Peter Zavalij Ruslan Prozorov Alexander J. Grutter Efrain E. Rodriguez Ichiro Takeuchi
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-con PACS 74.70.Dd74.25.Ha74.62.Bf
keywords LiNbO2CaH2 reductionbulk superconductivitynon-topotactic transformationhole dopingdelithiationupper critical fieldlayered niobate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that covering LiNbO3 single crystals with calcium hydride and heating them turns large volumes of the insulator into the layered metallic phase LiNbO2. The conversion is a full reconstructive change of the crystal structure, not a simple oxygen-vacancy process, and it produces superconductivity with an onset as high as 14.4 K and zero resistance at 13.3 K. SIMS and XPS establish that the superconductivity is hole-doped by lithium loss during the reduction, while magnetization and tunnel-diode measurements give a superconducting volume fraction near 77 percent and an upper critical field approaching 26 T. Because the starting crystals are macroscopic and the pathway is non-topotactic, the work argues that extreme hydride reduction can be used to make bulk samples of exotic oxides that were previously available only as powders or thin films.

Core claim

CaH2 reduction of LiNbO3 single crystals produces bulk layers of layered LiNbO2 that are metallic and superconducting, with Tc onset reaching 14.4 K, zero resistance at 13.3 K, a demagnetization-corrected superconducting volume fraction of approximately 77 percent, and an upper critical field near 26 T; the phase is hole-doped by delithiation that accompanies the reduction.

What carries the argument

Non-topotactic reconstructive phase transformation driven by CaH2 reduction: oxygen removal and lithium rearrangement convert the R3c LiNbO3 lattice into the P63/mmc layered LiNbO2 structure, simultaneously creating the hole doping needed for superconductivity.

Load-bearing premise

The claimed 77 percent superconducting volume fraction rests on taking the reduced-layer thickness from SEM images, applying a calculated demagnetization factor of 0.86, and attributing the entire magnetization signal to the LiNbO2 phase alone.

What would settle it

Measure magnetization on a fully converted single crystal whose entire volume is independently verified by cross-sectional EDS and powder XRD to be pure LiNbO2; if the corrected volume fraction remains well below 100 percent or the transition disappears, the bulk claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Macroscopic single-crystal samples of LiNbO2 become available for bulk probes of the NbO2 layers that were previously limited to powders and films.
  • Hydride reduction can be applied to other highly distorted, non-perovskite oxides to drive reconstructive transformations into superconducting or metallic phases.
  • The same process can create macroscopic LiNbO2/LiNbO3 heterostructures whose interfaces can be studied directly.
  • Upper-critical-field values near 26 T set a concrete target for device and high-field transport experiments on this material.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If grain-boundary lithium precipitates are the main source of local hole doping, intentional control of those precipitates could raise the superconducting volume fraction still further.
  • The preference for c-axis texture normal to the free surface suggests that surface energy, rather than epitaxial registry, selects the orientation of the product phase.
  • Comparable reduction kinetics at 650 °C for hundreds of micrometers imply that the advancing phase front, not simple oxygen diffusion, is rate-limiting—an idea that can be tested by deliberately introducing artificial grain boundaries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the synthesis of bulk layered LiNbO2 by CaH2 reduction of LiNbO3 single crystals (Y-, Z-, and Y-128° cuts). The reduction converts Nb5+ to Nb3+, driving a non-topotactic reconstructive transformation from R3c LiNbO3 to P63/mmc LiNbO2. Cross-sectional SEM/EDS, powder XRD Rietveld (≈80 wt% LiNbO2), HRXRD/Laue, SIMS, and XPS establish oxygen reduction, residual parent phase, preferred (00L) texture, and hole doping via delithiation (with concurrent hydrogenation). Transport shows metallic resistivity and superconductivity with Tc onset up to 14.4 K and zero resistance at 13.3 K; SQUID magnetization (after demagnetization correction N = 0.86) and tunnel-diode-resonator AC susceptibility give a superconducting volume fraction ≈77 % and Hc2(0) ≈ 24–26 T from Helfand–Werthamer fits. The work positions extreme hydride reduction as a route to bulk non-topotactic superconducting phases.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper supplies the first macroscopic crystals of superconducting LiNbO2, removing a long-standing materials bottleneck that has limited studies of possible unconventional 2D superconductivity in NbO2 layers. The demonstration that CaH2 reduction can drive bulk reconstructive (non-topotactic) transformations in a volatile, distorted oxide expands the method beyond thin-film nickelates and is of clear interest to the oxide-superconductivity and solid-state chemistry communities. Multiple orthogonal probes (SEM/EDS, Rietveld, SIMS/XPS, resistivity, SQUID, TDR) converge on the same picture, and the reported Tc and Hc2 values are competitive with the best prior powder/film results.

major comments (2)
  1. Section 2.2 and Figure 8: the superconducting volume fraction of ≈77 % is obtained from ZFC magnetization by taking the reduced-layer thickness from SEM, applying N = 0.86 for a rectangular cuboid, and assuming the diamagnetic signal arises solely from the LiNbO2 phase. Residual LiNbO3 (≈20 wt% by Rietveld), surface Li pile-up, and lateral Li clustering (SIMS maps, Fig. S3) introduce quantitative uncertainty. The existence of bulk zero-resistance superconductivity is not in doubt, but the precise fraction should be presented with explicit error bounds or an alternative estimate (e.g., from the TDR sample geometry) so that the claim remains robust.
  2. Section 2.1 (XPS/SIMS): the average Nb oxidation state (+3.86) and the stoichiometry Li0.96±0.225NbO1.83±0.187 are used to argue hole doping by delithiation. The large Li uncertainty, overlap of Li 1s with Nb 4s, and concurrent hydrogenation (electron doping) leave the net carrier type and density only qualitatively constrained. A brief discussion of how these competing dopants reconcile with the observed metallic and superconducting behavior would strengthen the doping claim that underpins the abstract and conclusion.
minor comments (5)
  1. Figure numbering is inconsistent: the text refers to “Figure 1(c)” for the EDS line scan while the caption labels it Figure 2(c); similar slips appear for SIMS (“Figure 3(a)” vs. Figure 5).
  2. Abstract and conclusion quote Tc onset as 14.4 K / 14.3 K interchangeably; standardize to the value shown in Figure 7.
  3. Section 3 diffusion argument: the comparison of activation energies and the 10^8 time-scale estimate is useful but would benefit from an explicit statement that Ea is assumed identical only for order-of-magnitude illustration.
  4. Methods 5.2: residual chamber pressure for SIMS is given as <5×10-7 Pa; confirm units consistency with the XPS base pressure (10-9 Torr / 10-7 Pa).
  5. Figure 4(a) 2D HRXRD: the unindexed weakly diffracting rings are attributed to surface impurities; a short note on whether they appear after polishing would clarify that they are not bulk secondary phases.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: experimental synthesis and property claims rest on direct multi-technique measurements, not self-referential definitions or fitted-as-prediction constructions.

full rationale

The paper is a materials-synthesis and characterization study. Its central claims (bulk LiNbO3-to-LiNbO2 conversion, metallic resistivity, Tc onset 14.4 K / zero-resistance 13.3 K, hole doping via delithiation, ~77 % superconducting volume fraction after geometric demagnetization correction, and Hc2(0) ~26 T) are obtained from independent experimental observables: cross-sectional SEM/EDS, powder XRD Rietveld, HRXRD/Laue, SIMS, XPS, four-probe resistivity, SQUID ZFC magnetization, and tunnel-diode-resonator AC susceptibility. The Helfand–Werthamer fits and demagnetization-factor calculation (N = 0.86 for a rectangular cuboid) are standard external formulas applied to measured data; they do not redefine the inputs as outputs. Self-citations (Prozorov demagnetization and TDR papers) supply established measurement techniques, not uniqueness theorems or load-bearing premises that force the result. No self-definitional loops, fitted-parameter-as-prediction steps, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appear. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and scores 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central experimental claim rests on standard crystallographic space groups, the Helfand–Werthamer model for upper-critical-field extrapolation, published demagnetization factors for rectangular samples, and the interpretation that Nb 3d XPS peak positions indicate Nb3+/Nb5+ mixtures. No new particles or forces are postulated; free parameters are limited to fitted Hc2(0) values and the geometric demagnetization factor used for volume-fraction conversion.

free parameters (3)
  • Hc2(0) from Helfand–Werthamer fit = ≈25–26 T
    Extrapolated zero-temperature upper critical field (25.92 T from transport, 24.28 T from TDR) obtained by fitting the approximate Helfand–Werthamer equation to measured Tc(H) data.
  • demagnetization factor N = 0.86
    N = 0.86 calculated for a rectangular cuboid in out-of-plane field and used to convert measured susceptibility into superconducting volume fraction.
  • reduction temperature and time = 650 °C, 120–480 h
    650 °C and 120–480 h chosen empirically to maximize Tc for each crystal orientation; these process parameters are free experimental knobs that control the final doping and phase purity.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Helfand–Werthamer theory correctly describes the temperature dependence of Hc2 for this dirty-limit type-II superconductor
    Used in Section 2.2 and Figure 9 to extrapolate Hc2(0) from finite-field Tc data.
  • domain assumption Effective demagnetizing factors of Prozorov & Kogan apply to the rectangular sample geometry
    Invoked to obtain the 77 % volume fraction from raw magnetization (Section 2.2).
  • domain assumption Nb 3d XPS binding energies of 203 eV / 206 eV correspond to Nb3+ and residual intensity to Nb5+
    Used to extract average oxidation state +3.86 and conclude hole doping (Section 2.1).
  • standard math Standard crystallographic models (R3c for LiNbO3, P63/mmc for LiNbO2) correctly index the observed powder and Laue patterns
    Basis of Rietveld refinement and orientation analysis (Figures 3–4).

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 18643 in / 2856 out tokens · 36451 ms · 2026-07-14T15:55:05.825654+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We have synthesized layered superconducting LiNbO$_2$ crystals through a bulk phase transformation from LiNbO$_3$ single crystals via CaH$_2$ reduction. As the Nb valence is reduced from 5+ to 3+, the material undergoes a structural transformation to the resulting product, LiNbO$_2$, which is accompanied by metallic behavior and a superconducting transition, Tc onset, as high as 14.4 K. Secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) show that the resulting phase is hole-doped through de-lithiation during the reduction. Magnetization and AC susceptibility measurements from a tunnel diode resonator confirm the bulk nature of superconductivity with a superconducting volume fraction of approximately 77% and an upper critical field approaching 26 T. Our study demonstrates extreme hydride reduction as an effective method to induce phase transformations with non-topotactic pathways and can be used to synthesize bulk materials with exotic properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06819 by Alexander J. Grutter, Amlan Datta, Bicky S. Moirangthem, Chih-Yu Lee, Efrain E. Rodriguez, Haotong Liang, Ichiro Takeuchi, Kamal R. Joshi, Keenan Avers, Makariy A. Tanatar, Parham Kabirifar, Peter Zavalij, Ruslan Prozorov, Ryan Paxson, Saya Takeuchi, Shanta Saha, Stephanie J. Hong, Tianyu Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Crystal structures of (a) LiNbO3 and (b) LiNbO2 with the CsPrS2 structure type. While past theoretical and experimental work suggest a wealth of exciting physics in LiNbO2, including possible unconventional two-dimensional superconductivity in NbO2 layers mediated through strong electron correlations, detailed investigations have been inhibited by the lack of bulk crystal samples.[35,36] Thus far, supercon… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Cross-sectional SEM image of LiNbO3 sample which was CaH2 reduced for 480 hours at 650 °C. (b) Oxygen Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) mapping shows the regions formed from the CaH2 reaction are oxygen reduced. (c) EDS line scans, indicate the LiNbO2 regions are uniform in oxygen stoichiometry and gradients in oxygen content are not observed. (d) Optical image of reduced sample cross section … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Rietveld refinement with powder XRD (CuK⍺ λ = 1.54 Å) data of LiNbO3 sample which was CaH2 reduced for 20 days at 650 °C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Two-dimensional HRXRD scan (a), showing structural anisotropy of reduced sample. The 2D HRXRD scan is integrated and plotted in one dimension shown in (b). Laue diffraction image of reduced sample (c) showing some Bragg reflection along with diffuse scattering. Quantitatively determining the lithium and hydrogen stoichiometry of LiNbO2 is challenging, so to investigate qualitative changes in lithium and hy… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Semi log plots of SIMS depth profiles of an unreduced, control LiNbO3 sample and a reduced LiNbO2 sample. (a) Lithium stoichiometry is compared through changes in the Li2 + /NbO+ ratio. (b) Differences in hydrogen concentration after reduction is evident by looking at the H- /NbO2 - ratio between both samples [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: XPS Spectra of control LiNbO3 (a-b) and polished LiNbO2 (c-d) samples. Nb 3d spectra and fittings are shown in (a) and (c). Li 1s and Nb 4s spectra and fittings are shown in (b) and (d). 2.2 Superconducting Properties We now turn to the superconducting properties of reduced LiNbO2 crystals. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: a) Resistivity vs. Temperature curve for sample which was reduced for 480 h at 650 °C. b) Resistivity vs. Temperature curves with different external fields applied perpendicular to the direction of the current. c) Critical temperature vs. CaH2 reaction times for substrates with various orientations. The SQUID measurements show the presence of a robust bulk Meissner effect in the superconducting samples. Th… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Meissner effect shown in ZFC Magnetization vs. Temperature for LiNbO2 sample. Magnetic field of 1 mT is applied out of plane with respect to the sample surface. This sample was synthesized through CaH2 at 650 oC for 480 h. Furthermore, the precise Meissner state magnetic response in a crystalline sample with dimensions of approximately 0.3 mm x 0.3 mm x 0.2 mm was measured using a tunnel diode resonator do… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Change in normalized magnetic susceptibility with temperature (a) from tunnel diode resonator measurements in zero field and different field cooling. The change in critical temperature with applied field as measured in (a) is plotted in (b) in purple and the upper critical field is fit with the purple dashed line from the inset equation.[39] The orange data points and dashed lines correspond to the change … view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Topochemical Reactions of Layered Transition-Metal Oxides,

    M. A. Hayward, "Topochemical Reactions of Layered Transition-Metal Oxides," Semiconductor Science and Technology 29, no. 6 (2014): 064010. https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/29/6/064010

    doi:10.1088/0268-1242/29/6/064010 2014

  2. [2]

    Hydride Reductions of Transition Metal Oxides,

    T. Yamamoto, H. Kageyama, “Hydride Reductions of Transition Metal Oxides,” Chem. Lett. 2013, 42 (9), 946–953. https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.130581

    doi:10.1246/cl.130581 2013

  3. [3]

    The Hydride Anion in an Extended Transition Metal Oxide Array: LaSrCoO3H0.7,

    M. A. Hayward, E. J. Cussen, J. B. Claridge, et al., “The Hydride Anion in an Extended Transition Metal Oxide Array: LaSrCoO3H0.7,” Science (80-. ). 2002, 295 (5561), 1882–1884. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068321

    doi:10.1126/science.1068321 2002

  4. [4]

    Sr3Co2O4.33H0.84: An Extended Transition Metal Oxide-Hydride,

    R. M. Helps, N. H. Rees, M. A. Hayward, “Sr3Co2O4.33H0.84: An Extended Transition Metal Oxide-Hydride,” Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49 (23), 11062–11068. https://doi/10.1021/ic101613b

    doi:10.1021/ic101613b 2010

  5. [5]

    Oxyhydrides of (Ca,Sr,Ba)TiO3 Perovskite Solid Solutions,

    T. Sakaguchi, Y. Kobayashi, T. Yajima, et al., “Oxyhydrides of (Ca,Sr,Ba)TiO3 Perovskite Solid Solutions,” Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51 (21), 11371–11376. https://doi.org/10.1021/IC300859N

    doi:10.1021/ic300859n 2012

  6. [6]

    Strontium Vanadium Oxide–Hydrides: “Square-Planar

    F. Romero, A. Leach, J. S. Möller, F. Foronda, S. J. Blundell, M. A. Hayward, “Strontium Vanadium Oxide–Hydrides: “Square-Planar” Two-Electron Phases,” Angew. Chemie 2014, 126 (29), 7686–7689. https://doi.org/10.1002/ANGE.201403536

    doi:10.1002/ange.201403536 2014

  7. [7]

    Synthesis of the Infinite Layer Ni(I) Phase NdNiO2+x by Low Temperature Reduction of NdNiO3 with Sodium Hydride,

    M. A. Hayward, M. J. Rosseinsky, “Synthesis of the Infinite Layer Ni(I) Phase NdNiO2+x by Low Temperature Reduction of NdNiO3 with Sodium Hydride,” Solid State Sci. 2003, 5 (6), 839–

    2003

  8. [8]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1293-2558(03)00111-0

    doi:10.1016/s1293-2558(03)00111-0

  9. [9]

    Anion Vacancy Distribution and Magnetism in the New Reduced Layered Co(II)/Co(I) Phase LaSrCoO3.5-,

    M. A. Hayward, M. J. Rosseinsky, “Anion Vacancy Distribution and Magnetism in the New Reduced Layered Co(II)/Co(I) Phase LaSrCoO3.5-,” Chem. Mater. 2000, 12 (8), 2182–2195. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm9906811. 15

    doi:10.1021/cm9906811 2000

  10. [10]

    Topotactic Reduction of YBaCo2O5 and LaBaCo 2O5: Square-Planar Co(I) in an Extended Oxide,

    J. Seddon, E. Suard, M. A. Hayward, “Topotactic Reduction of YBaCo2O5 and LaBaCo 2O5: Square-Planar Co(I) in an Extended Oxide,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (8), 2802–2810. https://doi.org/10.1021/JA910103D

    doi:10.1021/ja910103d 2010

  11. [11]

    Infinite-Layer Iron Oxide with a Square-Planar Coordination,

    Y. Tsujimoto, C. Tassel, N. Hayashi, et al., “Infinite-Layer Iron Oxide with a Square-Planar Coordination,” Nature 2007, 450 (7172), 1062–1065. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06382

    doi:10.1038/nature06382 2007

  12. [12]

    Superconductivity in an Infinite-Layer Nickelate,

    D. Li, K. Lee, B. Y. Wang, et al., “Superconductivity in an Infinite-Layer Nickelate,” Nature 2019, 572 (7771), 624–627. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1496-5

    doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1496-5 2019

  13. [13]

    Complex Magnetic Order in Topochemically Reduced Rh(I)/Rh(III) LaM0.5Rh0.5O2.25 (M = Co, Ni) Phases,

    Z. Xu, P. K. Thakur, T.-L. Lee, et al., “Complex Magnetic Order in Topochemically Reduced Rh(I)/Rh(III) LaM0.5Rh0.5O2.25 (M = Co, Ni) Phases,” Inorg. Chem. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.INORGCHEM.2C02747

    doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02747 2022

  14. [14]

    Epitaxial Thin Films of ATiO 3-XH x (A = Ba, Sr, Ca) with Metallic Conductivity,

    T. Yajima, A. Kitada, Y. Kobayashi, et al., “Epitaxial Thin Films of ATiO 3-XH x (A = Ba, Sr, Ca) with Metallic Conductivity,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (21), 8782–8785. https://doi.org/10.1021/JA302465C

    doi:10.1021/ja302465c 2012

  15. [15]

    Synthesis and Magnetism of Extended Solids Containing Transition-Metal Cations in Square-Planar, MO4 Coordination Sites,

    M. A. Hayward, “Synthesis and Magnetism of Extended Solids Containing Transition-Metal Cations in Square-Planar, MO4 Coordination Sites,” Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58 (18), 11961–11970. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.INORGCHEM.9B00960

    doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00960 2019

  16. [16]

    Observation of Superconductivity Up to 8.7 K in Reduced Potassium Tantalate,

    X. Cao, Z. Liu, J. Lu, et al., “Observation of Superconductivity Up to 8.7 K in Reduced Potassium Tantalate,” Adv Quantum Technol. 2024, 7, 2400255. https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202400255

    doi:10.1002/qute.202400255 2024

  17. [17]

    Hole and Electron Doping of the 4d Transition-Metal Oxyhydride LaSr3NiRuO4H4,

    L. Jin, M. A. Hayward, “Hole and Electron Doping of the 4d Transition-Metal Oxyhydride LaSr3NiRuO4H4,” Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2020, 59 (5), 2076–2079. https://doi.org/10.1002/ANIE.201913951

    doi:10.1002/anie.201913951 2020

  18. [18]

    Aspects of the Synthesis of Thin Film Superconducting Infinite-Layer Nickelates,

    K. Lee, B. H. Goodge, D. Li, et al, “Aspects of the Synthesis of Thin Film Superconducting Infinite-Layer Nickelates,” APL Mater. 2020, 8 (4), 041107. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0005103

    doi:10.1063/5.0005103 2020

  19. [19]

    Superconductivity in Infinite Layer Nickelates,

    Y. Ji, J. Liu, L. Li, Z .Liao, “Superconductivity in Infinite Layer Nickelates,” J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 130 (6), 060901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0056328

    doi:10.1063/5.0056328 2021

  20. [20]

    Charge Density Waves in Infinite-Layer NdNiO2 Nickelates,

    C. C. Tam, J. Choi, X. Ding, et al., “Charge Density Waves in Infinite-Layer NdNiO2 Nickelates,” Nat. Mater. 2022 2022, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01330-1

    doi:10.1038/s41563-022-01330-1 2022

  21. [21]

    An Oxyhydride of BaTiO3 Exhibiting Hydride Exchange and Electronic Conductivity,

    Y. Kobayashi, O. J. Hernandez, T. Sakaguchi, et al., “An Oxyhydride of BaTiO3 Exhibiting Hydride Exchange and Electronic Conductivity,” Nat. Mater. 2012 116 2012, 11 (6), 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3302

    doi:10.1038/nmat3302 2012

  22. [22]

    Highly Correlated Hydride Ion Tracer Diffusion in SrTiO 3-x H x Oxyhydrides,

    X. Liu, T. S. Bjørheim, L. Vines, et al., “Highly Correlated Hydride Ion Tracer Diffusion in SrTiO 3-x H x Oxyhydrides,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/JACS.8B12985

    doi:10.1021/jacs.8b12985 2019

  23. [23]

    Epitaxial Growth and Electronic Structure of Oxyhydride SrVO2H Thin Films,

    T. Katayama, A. Chikamatsu, K. Yamada, et al., “Epitaxial Growth and Electronic Structure of Oxyhydride SrVO2H Thin Films,” J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 120 (8), 085305. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4961446

    doi:10.1063/1.4961446 2016

  24. [24]

    Phase Separation in Reduced LiNbO3,

    H. M. Chan, Z. Zhuang, D. M. Smyth, “Phase Separation in Reduced LiNbO3,” MRS Online Proc. Libr. 1985, 60, 95. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-60-95. 16

    doi:10.1557/proc-60-95 1985

  25. [25]

    Superconductivity in the Layered Compound LixNbO2,

    M. J. Geselbracht, T. J. Richardson, A. M. Stacy, “Superconductivity in the Layered Compound LixNbO2,” Nature 1990, 345 (6273), 324–326. https://doi.org/10.1038/345324a0

    doi:10.1038/345324a0 1990

  26. [26]

    Structure and Electrical Characterization of Li1−xNbO2 Superconductor with Tc = 14–17 K,

    Z. Xue, A. Dong, Y. Guo, G. Che, “Structure and Electrical Characterization of Li1−xNbO2 Superconductor with Tc = 14–17 K,” J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 476 (1–2), 519–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2008.09.086

    doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.09.086 2009

  27. [27]

    Superconductivity of Hydrogen Inserted LiNbO2,

    N. Kumada, S. Watauchi, I. Tanaka, N. Kinomura, “Superconductivity of Hydrogen Inserted LiNbO2,” Mater. Res. Bull. 2000, 35 (11), 1743–1746. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025- 5408(00)00380-9

    doi:10.1016/s0025- 2000

  28. [28]

    P-Type Transparent Superconductivity in a Layered Oxide,

    T. Soma, K. Yoshimatsu, A. Ohtomo, “P-Type Transparent Superconductivity in a Layered Oxide,” Sci. Adv. 2020, 6 (29). https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIADV.ABB8570

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb8570 2020

  29. [29]

    Superconductivity in Semiconducting SrTiO3,

    J. F. Schooley, W. R. Hosler, M. L. Cohen, “Superconductivity in Semiconducting SrTiO3,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 1964, 12 (17), 474–475. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.12.474

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.12.474 1964

  30. [30]

    Electrical Properties of Epitaxial Thin Films of Oxyhydrides ATiO3-XHx (A = Ba and Sr),

    G. Bouilly, T. Yajima, T. Terashima, et al., “Electrical Properties of Epitaxial Thin Films of Oxyhydrides ATiO3-XHx (A = Ba and Sr),” Chem. Mater. 2015, 27 (18), 6354–6359. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.CHEMMATER.5B02374

    doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02374 2015

  31. [31]

    XPS Study of Li/Nb Ratio in LiNbO3 Crystals. Effect of Polarity and Mechanical Processing on LiNbO3 Surface Chemical Composition,

    E. A. Skryleva, I. V. Kubasov, P. V. Kiryukhantsev-Korneev, et al., “XPS Study of Li/Nb Ratio in LiNbO3 Crystals. Effect of Polarity and Mechanical Processing on LiNbO3 Surface Chemical Composition,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 389, 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2016.07.108

    doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.108 2016

  32. [32]

    Systematic and collaborative approach to problem solving using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy,

    N. Fairley, V. Fernandez, M. Richard‐Plouet, et al., “Systematic and collaborative approach to problem solving using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy,” Applied Surface Science Advances, 2021, 100112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100112

    doi:10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100112 2021

  33. [33]

    The Crystallization and Properties of Sputter Deposited Lithium Niobite,

    J. C. Shank, B. M. Tellekamp, A. W. Doolittle, “The Crystallization and Properties of Sputter Deposited Lithium Niobite,” Thin Solid Films 2016, 609, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSF.2016.01.030

    doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2016.01.030 2016

  34. [34]

    Direct Observation of Delithiation as the Origin of Analog Memristance in LixNbO2,

    S. A. Howard, C. N. Singh, G. J. Paez, et al., “Direct Observation of Delithiation as the Origin of Analog Memristance in LixNbO2,” APL Mater. 2019, 7 (7), 071103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5108525

    doi:10.1063/1.5108525 2019

  35. [35]

    H. D. Megaw, A Note on the structure of lithium niobate, LiNbO3. Acta Cryst. 1968 A24, 583-

    1968

  36. [36]

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567739468001282

    doi:10.1107/s0567739468001282

  37. [37]

    Two-dimensional superconductivity in single-band correlated 2H-type NbO2 layers,

    T. Soma, K. Yoshimatsu, K. Horiba, H. Kumigashira, A. Ohtomo, “Two-dimensional superconductivity in single-band correlated 2H-type NbO2 layers,” Phys. Rev. B 2022 105, 104504. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.104504

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.104504 2022

  38. [38]

    Electronic correlation and s-wave pairing effects in hole-doped LiNbO2: A DFT+DMFT study,

    L. Craco, “Electronic correlation and s-wave pairing effects in hole-doped LiNbO2: A DFT+DMFT study,” EPL (Europhysics Letters) 2024 145(2), 26004. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295- 5075/ad219c

    doi:10.1209/0295- 2024

  39. [39]

    Temperature and Purity Dependence of the Superconducting Critical Field, Hc2 III. Electron Spin and Spin-Orbit Effects

    N.R. Werthamer, E. Helfand, P.C. Hohenberg, “Temperature and Purity Dependence of the Superconducting Critical Field, Hc2 III. Electron Spin and Spin-Orbit Effects” Phys. Rev. B 1966 147, 295. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.147.295 17

    doi:10.1103/physrev.147.295 1966

  40. [40]

    Effective Demagnetizing Factors of Diamagnetic Samples of Various Shapes,

    R. Prozorov and V. G. Kogan, “Effective Demagnetizing Factors of Diamagnetic Samples of Various Shapes,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 2018 10, 014030. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.014030

    doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.10.014030 2018

  41. [41]

    Effective demagnetizing factors of superconductors with various shapes,

    R. Prozorov and V. G. Kogan, “Effective demagnetizing factors of superconductors with various shapes,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 2024, 22 (6), 064006. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.064006

    doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.064006 2024

  42. [42]

    Energy gap and proximity effect in MgB2 superconducting wires

    R. Prozorov, R. W. Giannetta, S. L. Bud'ko, and P. C. Canfield, “Energy gap and proximity effect in MgB2 superconducting wires” Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64 (18), 180501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.180501

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.64.180501 2001

  43. [43]

    Measurements of the absolute value of the penetration depth in high- superconductors using a low- superconductive coating,

    R. Prozorov, R. W. Giannetta, A. Carrington, P. Fournier, R. L. Greene, P. Guptasarma, D. G. Hinks, A. R. Banks, “Measurements of the absolute value of the penetration depth in high- superconductors using a low- superconductive coating,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 18 2000; 77 (25): 4202–4204. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1328362

    doi:10.1063/1.1328362 2000

  44. [44]

    GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package,

    B. H. Toby, R. B. Von Dreele, “GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package,” Journal of Applied Crystallography 2013, 46(2), 544-549. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889813003531 Supporting Information Synthesis of Bulk Superconducting LiNbO2 Crystals through CaH2 Reduction Ryan Paxson1,2,*, Stephanie J. Hong3, B...

    doi:10.1107/s0021889813003531 2013