Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 57 references

Hollow-core fiber demands system redesign, not drop-in swap

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

2026-07-09 23:41 UTC pith:Z5UDN4AJ

load-bearing objection Solid perspective on HCF cross-layer design; the gap between thesis and evidence is the real soft spot. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.06877 v1 pith:Z5UDN4AJ submitted 2026-07-08 physics.optics

Beyond Silica Assumptions: Optical Network Design in the Hollow-Core Era

Md Ghulam Saber , Zhiping Jiang This is my paper
classification physics.optics PACS 42.81.-i
keywords opticalsilicadesignfiberhollow-coreachievableadvantagesargue
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Hollow-core fiber (HCF), in which light travels through air rather than glass, has recently achieved attenuation below 0.1 dB/km—surpassing silica's fundamental loss floor—while also offering roughly 30% lower latency, negligible optical nonlinearity, and a broader low-loss spectral window. This paper argues that these properties are qualitatively different from incremental silica improvements because they break the specific material constraints around which five decades of optical network engineering were built: the Kerr-nonlinearity-limited launch power ceiling, the 1550-nm spectral window fixed by Rayleigh scattering and infrared absorption, the fixed group index of ~1.47, and the assumption of heavy dispersion-compensation DSP. The authors contend that deploying HCF as a faster but otherwise unchanged pipe would forfeit most of its value. Instead, the durable gains require cross-layer co-design—jointly re-optimizing physical-layer parameters (launch power, modulation format, span length), transceiver and DSP choices (equalizer architecture, subcarrier multiplexing, gas-line mitigation), and network-level decisions (latency-aware routing, budgeted hybrid HCF–SMF placement, amplifier siting). The paper identifies two new HCF-specific impairments—intermodal interference (IMI), a coherent multipath effect replacing Kerr nonlinearity as the binding constraint, and narrow gas-absorption lines from residual CO₂ and water vapor—that must be priced into any system design. It outlines five research priorities: standardized field-grade characterization, system studies that jointly count all impairments, interface and component ecosystem development, cross-layer planning tools, and exploration of adjacent uses like power-over-fiber and quantum networking.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is analytical rather than experimental: it argues that the engineering conventions of optical networking—span lengths, launch-power budgeting, wavelength planning, DSP allocation, amplifier siting, and routing policy—are not intrinsic to optical communication but are artifacts of silica's specific material properties (a loss floor near 0.14 dB/km at 1550 nm, a Kerr nonlinearity coefficient of ~1.3 W⁻¹km⁻¹, and a group index of ~1.47). HCF, by guiding light in air, removes the field from glass and thereby loosens all three constraints simultaneously. The authors' core assertion is that this simultaneous loosening creates a qualitatively new design space that cannotbe

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by four HCF properties and two new impairments. The properties are: (1) sub-0.1 dB/km attenuation across an ~18 THz window, set by confinement leakage and surface roughness rather than Rayleigh scattering; (2) a group index near unity, giving ~3.3 μs/km one-way delay versus ~4.9 μs/km; (3) a Kerr coefficient of order 5×10⁻⁴ W⁻¹km⁻¹, roughly three orders of magnitude below silica, which lifts the nonlinear optimum from ~0–2 dBm to tens of dBm; and (4) chromatic dispersion of ~3 ps/nm/km, several times below standard fiber. The two new impairments are intermodal interference (IMI)—a coherent multipath effect with differential group delays of ~4–5 ns/km, fixed by fiber/c

Load-bearing premise

The cross-layer co-design thesis depends on HCF's distinguishing properties—particularly sub-0.1 dB/km loss and negligible nonlinearity—holding in fielded, cabled, multi-span systems at scale. The lowest reported values come from individual fibers over short-to-moderate lengths, and their translation to deployed systems with cabling strain, splicing, aging, and environmental exposure is not yet established. If these properties degrade toward silica-era levels under fielded, c

What would settle it

If fielded, cabled, multi-span HCF systems show that cabling strain, splice non-uniformity, membrane aging, and gas ingress degrade loss toward or above 0.14 dB/km and raise IMI above the ~-60 dB/km threshold needed for long-haul reach, then the design-space expansion that motivates cross-layer co-design narrows back toward silica-era conventions, and HCF becomes the incremental medium the paper argues against.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the cross-layer thesis holds, network capacity gains of ~36–100% in feasible-path counts could be achieved by converting only 10–25% of spans to HCF, reframing deployment as a budgeted optimization problem rather than wholesale replacement.
  • Latency becomes a first-class routing variable: two paths of equal physical length can differ in delay by ~30% based on fiber type, enabling delay-constrained routing for AI training collectives, financial messaging, and distributed consensus.
  • The amplifier ecosystem for new wavelength bands (ytterbium near 1 μm, bismuth in O/E/S, thulium and holmium near 2 μm) becomes the gating technology for exploiting HCF's broader low-loss window; without it, the spectral freedom is inert.
  • DSP complexity may not decrease net: dispersion-equalizer savings from lower chromatic dispersion could be offset by additional taps needed for IMI and gas-line mitigation, requiring end-to-end measurement rather than per-block assumption.
  • Transceiver back-to-back SNR becomes the hard ceiling on achievable modulation order, meaning HCF's link-level GSNR headroom should be spent on spectral parallelism (many moderate-baud subcarriers) rather than chasing symbol rates the converters cannot support.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. This perspective paper argues that hollow-core fiber (HCF), particularly nested anti-resonant nodeless fiber (NANF/DNANF), should not be treated as a drop-in replacement for solid-core silica but rather as a catalyst for cross-layer co-design of optical networks. The authors review HCF's distinguishing physical-layer properties—sub-0.1 dB/km attenuation, negligible Kerr nonlinearity, ~30% lower latency, low chromatic dispersion, and a broad low-loss window—and trace their implications through the transceiver/DSP and network-architecture layers. They identify new impairments specific to air guidance (intermodal interference, gas-line absorption, reduced backscatter) and outline a research roadmap spanning standardized characterization, system-level studies, interface development, and cross-layer planning tools. The central thesis is that the most durable benefits of HCF will come from jointly re-optimizing design choices that co-evolved with silica's specific properties, rather than from incremental substitution.

Significance. The paper addresses a timely and important question: whether the optical networking community's design conventions, built around silica for five decades, should be revisited in light of HCF's qualitatively different properties. The value lies not in reporting new experimental results but in systematically separating medium-independent constraints (Shannon limits, ASE accumulation) from silica-specific artifacts (Kerr-limited launch power, 1550-nm window fixation, high dispersion). Table I and Figure 2 are effective organizing devices. The roadmap section (five priorities) is concrete and actionable. The paper is commendably honest about limitations: it flags that record loss values come from individual short fibers, that measurement methods disagree, that most demonstrations are lab or trial results, and that field translation is unestablished. The cross-layer co-design thesis is logically motivated by the coupling of variables (launch power, modulation, route, fiber type), though as discussed below, the evidence base for joint optimization outperforming sequential adaptation is not yet available.

major comments (4)
  1. The central claim—that 'the most durable benefits of HCF may arise not from its use as a drop-in replacement, but from cross-layer co-design' (Abstract; Section I)—is supported by single-layer evidence but not by any cited demonstration of joint cross-layer optimization. The cited results—high-power boosting (refs 19, 20), gas-line DSP mitigation (refs 29, 30), per-channel power optimization (ref 21), latency-aware placement (ref 54), hybrid span modeling (refs 11, 12)—each optimize within one layer. Figure 2 traces cross-layer coupling conceptually but provides no quantitative comparison of joint versus sequential optimization. The hedged language ('may arise') is appropriate for a perspective, but the gap between 'HCF properties differ from silica' (well-supported) and 'cross-layer co-design is the path to durable benefits' (asserted) is the paper's soft spot. The authors should either
  2. Section 'Launch power, modulation and DSP': the claim that 'the net receiver-DSP complexity of an HCF link is not obviously lower and should be measured end-to-end rather than assumed' is important and likely correct, but it sits in tension with Table I's entry for DSP, which lists chromatic-dispersion compensation as 'Reassess: dispersion is low and flatter' without flagging the compensating DSP costs from IMI and gas-line equalization. Table I would be more balanced if it noted that net DSP complexity is an open question rather than implying a simplification.
  3. Section 'Intermodal interference': the paper states that 'levels below about −60 dB/km are needed for transoceanic reach' and cites a fiber measured at −68.8 dB/km enabling 6660 km transmission (ref 20). However, the paper also notes that IMI 'accumulates with the worst segment, so a single non-uniform span or poor splice can set the IMI of an entire link.' This raises a critical but unaddressed question: what is the distribution of IMI across manufactured fiber and splices in field conditions, and does the −68.8 dB/km value represent a production median or a record outlier? The paper should clarify whether the threshold analysis assumes uniform IMI along the entire link or accounts for segment variability, since this directly affects the deployment feasibility argument.
  4. Section 'Gas-line absorption': the mitigation toolkit is well-reviewed, but the paper does not address whether gas content is stable over the fiber lifetime or whether gas ingress at cable breaks or through membrane diffusion could worsen absorption over time. This is flagged later in the roadmap ('long-term reliability—aging of the thin membranes, gas or moisture ingress') but is not integrated into the gas-line discussion where it materially affects the mitigation trade-offs. A brief cross-reference would strengthen the analysis.
minor comments (7)
  1. Figure 1b: the y-axis label 'Lowest reported loss (dB km−1)' includes values (0.04, 0.02) that are described in the text as modeling projections, not measured results. The figure should distinguish measured data points from projected/theoretical values, or the caption should clarify this.
  2. Section 'Wavelength windows': the statement 'low loss has been measured across ~18 THz' should specify whether this refers to the 1481–1625 nm window cited earlier or a different span, for consistency.
  3. Table I caption states 'Entries are qualitative and indicate direction rather than settled conclusions,' which is appropriate, but the 'Status for anti-resonant HCF' column for 'Fiber is a near-ideal single-mode, low-reflection waveguide' could note that MPI at SMF–HCF interfaces is a practical concern, as discussed in the text.
  4. The self-citation density (refs 26, 32, 38, 52, 53, 55 are by the authors) is reasonable given that these support specific technical points, but ref 55 (Saber & Jiang, 'Physical layer standardization for AI data centers') is cited in the latency-routing section without clear relevance to the specific claim about delay-constrained routing. A more directly relevant citation would help.
  5. Section 'Monitoring and sensing': the statement that 'longitudinal power-profile estimation must instead lean on the short solid-core jumpers embedded at amplifier sites' could briefly note the limitation that this provides only coarse, discrete-point monitoring rather than continuous profiling.
  6. The manuscript uses 'effectively nonlinearity-free' (Section I) and 'negligible nonlinearity' (Table I) somewhat interchangeably. Given that the nonlinear coefficient is reported as ~5×10⁻⁴ W⁻¹km⁻¹ (not zero), consistent terminology would improve precision.
  7. Section 'Hybrid silica–HCF networks': the placement-study results (36% improvement at 10% HCF budget, up to 100% at 20%) cite ref 54, but the specific network topologies and traffic assumptions underlying these numbers are not described even briefly, making it hard to assess generality.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the paper is a perspective with no formal derivation chain that could reduce to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

This is a perspective/review paper, not a derivation paper. Its central claim—that cross-layer co-design will yield more durable benefits from HCF than drop-in replacement—is an architectural argument, not a mathematical theorem or a fitted prediction. The paper's logical chain proceeds from measured HCF properties (sub-0.1 dB/km loss, negligible Kerr nonlinearity, ~30% lower delay, gas-line absorption, IMI) to design implications at each layer, and then to the assertion that these layers are coupled. No step in this chain reduces to its inputs by definition or by a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The self-citations (refs 26, 32, 38, 52, 53, 55 by Saber & Jiang) support specific technical points—transceiver noise limits, CO2 capacity maps, hybrid network protection, AI data-center standardization—but none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or an unfalsifiable ansatz that would force the central conclusion. The paper explicitly frames cross-layer co-design as a hypothesis to be tested ('We advance this as a hypothesis to be tested, not a settled result') and outlines open questions, which is the opposite of smuggling a conclusion through circular logic. The gap between evidence (single-layer demonstrations) and thesis (joint optimization) is a correctness/evidential concern, not a circularity concern: the paper does not claim to have demonstrated joint optimization, it argues for it as a research program. No self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, or uniqueness-imported circularity is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new entities are postulated. The paper discusses physical phenomena (IMI, gas-line absorption, backscatter suppression) that are already established in the HCF literature it cites.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption HCF attenuation below 0.1 dB/km is achievable and will translate to fielded, cabled systems at scale
    Section I: the 0.091 dB/km record is from a single 15-km fiber; the paper acknowledges 'the lowest values are reported for individual fibers over short-to-moderate lengths.' The cross-layer co-design thesis depends on this loss being achievable in deployment.
  • domain assumption Kerr nonlinearity in HCF is negligible enough to remove the power-optimum ceiling that defines silica-era design
    Section 'Silica-era assumptions': the argument that launch power optimum 'effectively ceases to bind' rests on the nonlinear coefficient being ~5×10^-4 W^-1 km^-1, cited from refs 10-12. If nonlinearity were higher in fielded conditions, the design-space expansion would narrow.
  • domain assumption Intermodal interference and gas-line absorption are manageable impairments that do not negate HCF's advantages
    Sections on IMI and gas-line absorption: the paper argues these are mitigable with DSP, fiber design, and spectral pre-emphasis, but acknowledges thresholds (e.g., IMI below -60 dB/km needed for transoceanic reach) that are met only in specific fibers.
  • domain assumption The component ecosystem (amplifiers, splices, interfaces) for HCF will mature sufficiently to enable cross-layer co-design
    Section 'Wavelength windows and the component ecosystem': the paper states 'their economics may set adoption timing more than fiber loss does' and that new-band amplification is 'the gating technology.' The co-design thesis implicitly assumes this gap will close.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 17873 in / 4089 out tokens · 161902 ms · 2026-07-09T23:41:01.616304+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Hollow-core fiber (HCF) is often presented as a modestly improved transmission medium that can be inserted into networks originally designed for solid-core silica. We argue instead that recent progress -- most notably the reported attenuation below 0.1 dBkm$^{-1}$, together with a broad low-loss window, reduced propagation delay, and extremely low optical nonlinearity -- makes it timely to reconsider which long-standing design conventions are fundamental to optical communication and which are specific to silica fiber. By reviewing implications at the physical-layer, transceiver, and network-architecture levels, we suggest that the most durable benefits of HCF may arise not from its use as a drop-in replacement, but from cross-layer co-design. We also outline the studies and experimental demonstrations needed to determine where such advantages are genuinely achievable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06877 by Md Ghulam Saber, Zhiping Jiang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Why hollow-core fiber has re-emerged. a, Cross-section of a double-nested anti-resonant nodeless fiber (DNANF). b, Lowest reported HCF attenuation by year, with the silica record floor for reference (dashed) 3,6–8,17,18 . c, Schematic attenuation spectra of silica SMF and anti-resonant HCF (illustrative, not measured). medium, not a parameter to be iterated, and is essentially unique to air guidance. Secon… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: From a faster fiber to cross-layer co-design. Conceptual schematic: hollow-core fiber properties (left) propagate through the physical, transceiver/DSP and network layers (center)—each with a silica-era assumption (gray) and an air-guided reconsideration (black)—to where HCF can help first (right). The vertical arrow denotes cross-layer coupling. silica operation over the accessible power range, and the ad… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Physical-layer trade-offs under air guidance. a, SNR versus per-channel launch power for silica SMF and HCF10 (illustrative, not measured). b, Modeled CO2 absorption comb in the L band, showing the P- and R-branches of two CO2 rotational-vibrational bands; loss per unit length at a 0.10 dB km−1 R-branch peak and 1 GHz linewidth29,36,37 (illustrative, not measured). Bidirectional, full-band transmission ove… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: From links to networks. a, Selective HCF deployment on a heterogeneous network: latency-critical routes and hybrid HCF–SMF spans alongside legacy SMF. b, One-way propagation delay versus distance for silica SMF and HCF9 . capacity and cost—most valuably for traffic with hard delay bounds: the synchronization and collective-communication phases of distributed AI training, where tail latency can gate cluster… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Single-mode photonic band gap guidance of light in air,

    R. F. Cregan, B. J. Mangan, J. C. Knight, T. A. Birks, P. S. J. Russell, P. J. Roberts, and D. C. Allan, “Single-mode photonic band gap guidance of light in air,”Science, vol. 285, no. 5433, pp. 1537–1539, 1999

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    Photonic crystal fibers,

    P. S. J. Russell, “Photonic crystal fibers,”Science, vol. 299, no. 5605, pp. 358–362, 2003

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Ultimate low loss of hollow-core photonic crystal fibres,

    P. J. Roberts, F. Couny, H. Sabert, B. J. Mangan, D. P. Williams, L. Farr, M. W. Mason, A. Tomlinson, T. A. Birks, J. C. Knight, and P. S. J. Russell, “Ultimate low loss of hollow-core photonic crystal fibres,”Optics Express, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 236–244, 2005

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Nested antiresonant nodeless hollow core fiber,

    F. Poletti, “Nested antiresonant nodeless hollow core fiber,”Optics Express, vol. 22, no. 20, pp. 23 807–23 828, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Loss in hollow-core optical fibers: mechanisms, scaling rules, and limits,

    E. Numkam Fokoua, S. A. Mousavi, G. T. Jasion, D. J. Richardson, and F. Poletti, “Loss in hollow-core optical fibers: mechanisms, scaling rules, and limits,”Advances in Optics and Photonics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–85, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Antiresonant hollow core fibre with 0.65 dB/km attenuation across the C and L telecommunication bands,

    T. D. Bradley, G. T. Jasion, J. R. Hayes, Y . Chen, L. Hooper, H. Sakr, M. Alonso Gouveia, A. Tarantaet al., “Antiresonant hollow core fibre with 0.65 dB/km attenuation across the C and L telecommunication bands,” in45th European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC), 2019, paper PD.3.1

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    0.174 dB/km hollow core double nested antiresonant nodeless fiber (DNANF),

    G. T. Jasion, H. Sakr, J. R. Hayes, S. R. Sandoghchi, L. Hooper, E. Numkam Fokoua, A. Saljoghei, H. C. Mulvad et al., “0.174 dB/km hollow core double nested antiresonant nodeless fiber (DNANF),” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), postdeadline, 2022, paper Th4C.7

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Broadband optical fibre with an attenuation lower than 0.1 decibel per kilometre,

    M. N. Petrovich, E. Numkam Fokoua, Y . Chen, H. Sakr, A. I. Adamu, R. Hassan, D. Wu, R. Fatobene Ando, A. Papadimopoulos, S. R. Sandoghchi, G. T. Jasion, and F. Poletti, “Broadband optical fibre with an attenuation lower than 0.1 decibel per kilometre,”Nature Photonics, vol. 19, pp. 1203–1208, 2025. PHOTONICS, VOL. X, NO. X, XX 2026 9

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Towards high-capacity fibre-optic communications at the speed of light in vacuum,

    F. Poletti, N. V . Wheeler, M. N. Petrovich, N. Baddela, E. Numkam Fokoua, J. R. Hayes, D. R. Gray, Z. Li, R. Slavík, and D. J. Richardson, “Towards high-capacity fibre-optic communications at the speed of light in vacuum,”Nature Photonics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 279–284, 2013

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Nonlinearity-free coherent transmission in hollow-core antiresonant fiber,

    Z. Liu, B. Karanov, L. Galdino, J. R. Hayes, D. Lavery, K. Clark, K. Shi, D. J. Elson, B. C. Thomsen, M. N. Petrovich, D. J. Richardson, F. Poletti, R. Slavík, and P. Bayvel, “Nonlinearity-free coherent transmission in hollow-core antiresonant fiber,”Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 909–916, 2019

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Hollow-core fiber properties and system-level specifications for next-generation optical transport networks,

    B. Correia and J. Pedro, “Hollow-core fiber properties and system-level specifications for next-generation optical transport networks,”Photonics, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 71, 2026

    work page 2026

  12. [12]

    Fiber mixture optimization of future hybrid HCF–SMF multi-span transmission systems,

    L. S. Braga, J. Renaudier, and A. Ghazisaeidi, “Fiber mixture optimization of future hybrid HCF–SMF multi-span transmission systems,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper Th1J.2

    work page 2026

  13. [13]

    Microsoft acquires Lumenisity, an innovator in hollow core fiber (HCF) cable,

    Microsoft Corp., “Microsoft acquires Lumenisity, an innovator in hollow core fiber (HCF) cable,” Official Microsoft Blog, 2022, 9 December 2022. [Online]. Available: https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2022/12/09/ microsoft-acquires-lumenisity-an-innovator-in-hollow-core-fiber-hcf-cable/

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Emerging network-wide use cases for hollow core fibers (invited),

    M. Ibrahimi, G. S. Sticca, F. Musumeci, and M. Tornatore, “Emerging network-wide use cases for hollow core fibers (invited),” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper W1H.1

    work page 2026

  15. [15]

    Real-time high-speed transmission over deployed AR-HCFs: Challenges, enabling technologies, and future perspectives,

    D. Ge, D. Wang, M. Zuo, H. Li, and D. Zhang, “Real-time high-speed transmission over deployed AR-HCFs: Challenges, enabling technologies, and future perspectives,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper Tu3E.6

    work page 2026

  16. [16]

    Hollow-core optical fibers for telecommunications and data transmission,

    K. Borzycki and T. Osuch, “Hollow-core optical fibers for telecommunications and data transmission,”Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 19, p. 10699, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Hollow core DNANF optical fiber with<0.11 dB/km loss,

    Y . Chenet al., “Hollow core DNANF optical fiber with<0.11 dB/km loss,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), postdeadline, 2024, paper Th4A.8

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Low intermodal interference and low loss hollow core fibers,

    P. Li, G. Chen, A. Jia, H. Li, J. Chu, Y . Liu, L. Zhang, L. Zhang, and J. Luo, “Low intermodal interference and low loss hollow core fibers,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper M2J.1

    work page 2026

  19. [19]

    222-km-long hybrid span transmission systems made of support-tube hollow core fiber and standard single-mode fiber using a high-power doped- fiber amplifier,

    H. Mardoyan, R. S. B. Ospina, C. Castineiras Carrero, A. Ghazisaeidi, R. Boddedaet al., “222-km-long hybrid span transmission systems made of support-tube hollow core fiber and standard single-mode fiber using a high-power doped- fiber amplifier,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper Th1J.4

    work page 2026

  20. [20]

    Sparsely repeated 21.7 Tb/s net-rate transoceanic transmission with 266-km ultra-long spans enabled by low-IMI and low-loss hollow core fiber,

    R. Boddeda, C. Castineiras Carrero, H. Mardoyan, A. Ghazisaeidi, P. Li, S. Li, L. Zhang, J. Luo, and J. Renaudier, “Sparsely repeated 21.7 Tb/s net-rate transoceanic transmission with 266-km ultra-long spans enabled by low-IMI and low-loss hollow core fiber,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper Th4B.7

    work page 2026

  21. [21]

    Transmitter power optimization for uniform-performance multi-span hollow-core fiber transmission,

    Y . Hong, M. Kamalian-Kopae, A. Ali, B. Gholizadehet al., “Transmitter power optimization for uniform-performance multi-span hollow-core fiber transmission,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper Th1J.5

    work page 2026

  22. [22]

    Optimal output power for C-band optical amplifiers in transparent WDM networks based on hollow core fiber,

    T. Zami, N. Rossi, and B. Lavigne, “Optimal output power for C-band optical amplifiers in transparent WDM networks based on hollow core fiber,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper W1H.3

    work page 2026

  23. [23]

    Opportunities and challenges for long-distance transmission in hollow-core fibres,

    P. Poggiolini and F. Poletti, “Opportunities and challenges for long-distance transmission in hollow-core fibres,”Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1605–1616, 2022

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Hollow core optical fibres with comparable attenuation to silica fibres between 600 and 1100 nm,

    H. Sakr, T. D. Bradley, G. T. Jasion, E. Numkam Fokoua, S. R. Sandoghchi, I. A. Davidson, A. Taranta, G. Guerra, W. Shere, Y . Chen, J. R. Hayes, D. J. Richardson, and F. Poletti, “Hollow core optical fibres with comparable attenuation to silica fibres between 600 and 1100 nm,”Nature Communications, vol. 11, p. 6030, 2020

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    First dual-band hybrid-window antiresonant HCF with 0.13 dB/km loss at 1µm and 0.11 dB/km at 1.55µm,

    G. Amouzad Mahdiraji, S. M. Abokhamis Mousavi, D. Wuet al., “First dual-band hybrid-window antiresonant HCF with 0.13 dB/km loss at 1µm and 0.11 dB/km at 1.55µm,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper Th4B.8

    work page 2026

  26. [26]

    Practical Limits of Higher-Order QAM in Hollow-Core Fiber Systems

    M. G. Saber and Z. Jiang, “Practical limits of higher-order qam in hollow-core fiber systems,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23527

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Characterization of multi-path interference of 10-km hollow core fiber using swept-wavelength interferometry,

    N. K. Fontaine, S. Grilanda, R. Ryf, L. Dallachiesa, D. T. Neilsonet al., “Characterization of multi-path interference of 10-km hollow core fiber using swept-wavelength interferometry,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper M2J.5

    work page 2026

  28. [28]

    Backscattering characterization in hollow-core fibers: Isolating air- molecule and surface-scattering origins via direct and coherent OTDR techniques,

    A. Nakamura, J. Hayakawa, H. Iida, and K. Toge, “Backscattering characterization in hollow-core fibers: Isolating air- molecule and surface-scattering origins via direct and coherent OTDR techniques,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper M2J.2

    work page 2026

  29. [29]

    DSP optimization for CO 2 absorption impact in hollow core fiber coherent optical transmission systems,

    C. Li, H. Liu, Q. Qiu, Z. Wang, H. Jianget al., “DSP optimization for CO 2 absorption impact in hollow core fiber coherent optical transmission systems,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper W2A.50

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    Gas-line absorption mitigation in hollow-core fibre using spectral pre-equalisation,

    E. Sillekens and R. Sohanpal, “Gas-line absorption mitigation in hollow-core fibre using spectral pre-equalisation,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper Th2A.50

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    Beyond 550 Tb/s S+C+L-band bidirectional transmission over 10.9-km anti-resonant hollow-core fiber,

    X. Li, T. Zhang, S. Mi, X. Zhang, H. Jiet al., “Beyond 550 Tb/s S+C+L-band bidirectional transmission over 10.9-km anti-resonant hollow-core fiber,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper Th1J.6

    work page 2026

  32. [32]

    Hollow-Core Fiber in Direct-Detection Optical Networks: Technology Readiness, Deployment Drivers, and Adoption Outlook

    M. G. Saber and Z. Jiang, “Hollow-core fiber in direct-detection optical networks: Technology readiness, deployment drivers, and adoption outlook,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23511

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Hollow-core fiber capacities with receiver noise limitations,

    W. Klaus and P. J. Winzer, “Hollow-core fiber capacities with receiver noise limitations,” inOptical Fiber Communication PHOTONICS, VOL. X, NO. X, XX 2026 10 Conference (OFC), 2022, paper M2C.4

    work page 2026

  34. [34]

    Field study on phase and polarization dynamics of deployed anti-resonant hollow core fiber cable for vibration sensing,

    J. Fang, M.-F. Huang, S. Kotrla, J. A. Mundt, T. Wang, and Y . Aono, “Field study on phase and polarization dynamics of deployed anti-resonant hollow core fiber cable for vibration sensing,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper M2J.4

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    Leveraging digital subcarrier multiplexing for long-haul transmission over HCFs in the presence of IMI,

    R. S. B. Ospina, C. Castineiras Carrero, H. Mardoyan, A. Ghazisaeidi, R. Boddedaet al., “Leveraging digital subcarrier multiplexing for long-haul transmission over HCFs in the presence of IMI,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper Th1J.3

    work page 2026

  36. [36]

    Accelerating hollow-core fiber deployment: An efficient one-shot field measurement technique to characterize CO 2 absorption-induced OSNR penalty,

    Y . He, S. Chen, L. Dou, Z. Zhai, H. Zhang, Y . Su, and A. P. T. Lau, “Accelerating hollow-core fiber deployment: An efficient one-shot field measurement technique to characterize CO 2 absorption-induced OSNR penalty,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper Tu3E.3

    work page 2026

  37. [37]

    X. Wang, Z. Li, L. Feng, P. Li, K. Lv, X. Sheng, Y . Liu, R. Gao, X. Xin, L. Zhang, J. Luo, A. Zhang, X. Huo, T. Ma, and Z. Wang, “Simulation investigation of CO2 absorption-induced performance degradation in hollow-core fiber transmission systems and spectrum-optimized digital sub-carrier multiplexing design for circumvention,”Optics Letters, vol. 50, no...

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    CO2-limited hollow-core fiber links: A capacity-map guide to pre-emphasis and spectral avoidance,

    M. G. Saber and Z. Jiang, “CO2-limited hollow-core fiber links: A capacity-map guide to pre-emphasis and spectral avoidance,”Photonics, vol. 13, no. 6, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6732/13/6/559

    work page 2026

  39. [39]

    Fully integrated 1064 nm transmitters with widely tunable GaAs lasers and>100-GHz thin-film LiNbO3 modulators,

    B. Shen, K. Bian, K. Asawaet al., “Fully integrated 1064 nm transmitters with widely tunable GaAs lasers and>100-GHz thin-film LiNbO3 modulators,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper Th4A.5

    work page 2026

  40. [40]

    Making the hollow core fibers compatible with current fiber infrastructure,

    R. Slavík, M. Komanec, and F. Poletti, “Making the hollow core fibers compatible with current fiber infrastructure,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper M1J.5

    work page 2026

  41. [41]

    Coupling light from laser to NANF with a hyperbolic-profile fiber microlens,

    J. Zandueta, S. Lobo, F. Saliou, L. Bramerie, M. Gay, P. Chanclou, and M. Thual, “Coupling light from laser to NANF with a hyperbolic-profile fiber microlens,”Optics Express, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 16 179–16 192, 2026

    work page 2026

  42. [42]

    High-performance fusion splicing technique for anti-resonant hollow-core fiber (invited),

    C. Zhang, S. Fu, and Y . Qin, “High-performance fusion splicing technique for anti-resonant hollow-core fiber (invited),” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper M1J.3

    work page 2026

  43. [43]

    Fast, low-loss, and field-deployable splicing of anti-resonant hollow-core fibers,

    L. Feng, W. He, C. Zhang, X. Wang, W. Changet al., “Fast, low-loss, and field-deployable splicing of anti-resonant hollow-core fibers,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper M1J.4

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    Inline measurement and automated feedback control of hollow- core fiber microstructure,

    L. Budd, S. R. Sandoghchi, G. Payne, G. Malteseet al., “Inline measurement and automated feedback control of hollow- core fiber microstructure,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper M1J.1

    work page 2026

  45. [45]

    Bidirectional full C-band transmission over hollow- core cable using 400G ZR,

    Y . Hong, A. Ali, M. Kamalian-Kopae, S. Bakhtiari Gorajoobiet al., “Bidirectional full C-band transmission over hollow- core cable using 400G ZR,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper M1B.4

    work page 2026

  46. [46]

    2×30.4 Tb/s bidirectional 60.85-km long data center interconnect using low-loss hollow core fiber and 800G ZR OSFP modules,

    A. Dupas, C. Castineiras Carrero, H. Mardoyan, P. Li, L. Zhang, J. Luoet al., “2×30.4 Tb/s bidirectional 60.85-km long data center interconnect using low-loss hollow core fiber and 800G ZR OSFP modules,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper M1B.5

    work page 2026

  47. [47]

    Extending longitudinal performance monitoring to hollow-core fiber systems: Feasibility and implementation,

    C. Hahn, Y . Xu, X. Guan, L. Han, and Z. Jiang, “Extending longitudinal performance monitoring to hollow-core fiber systems: Feasibility and implementation,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper M4K.1

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    Progresses of pilot tone based optical performance monitoring in coherent systems,

    Z. Jiang, X. Tang, S. Wang, G. Gao, D. Jin, J. Wang, and M. Si, “Progresses of pilot tone based optical performance monitoring in coherent systems,”Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 3128–3136, 2022

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    First demonstration of distributed sensing capability of NANF hollow-core fiber,

    S. Chen, Z. Zhao, P. Li, L. Zhang, M. Tang, and C. Lu, “First demonstration of distributed sensing capability of NANF hollow-core fiber,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper M2J.3

    work page 2026

  50. [50]

    Simplified bidirectional PON over 22-km AR-HCF with 200-Gb/s downstream and 50-Gb/s upstream,

    X. Liu, Y . Liu, C. Li, S. Li, P. Sunet al., “Simplified bidirectional PON over 22-km AR-HCF with 200-Gb/s downstream and 50-Gb/s upstream,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper Th1K.3

    work page 2026

  51. [51]

    20.2 Pb/s C+L-band wavelength-reconfigurable real-time optical network applied in inter data-center transmission with 316 switching channels,

    L. Huang, P. Sun, L. Dai, J. Wu, M. Linet al., “20.2 Pb/s C+L-band wavelength-reconfigurable real-time optical network applied in inter data-center transmission with 316 switching channels,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper M1B.6

    work page 2026

  52. [52]

    Hollow-core and standard single-mode fiber hybrid optical networks: A multi-topology investigation of protection switching,

    M. G. Saber and Z. Jiang, “Hollow-core and standard single-mode fiber hybrid optical networks: A multi-topology investigation of protection switching,” inThe 52nd European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC 2026), Malaga, Spain, September 2026

    work page 2026

  53. [53]

    Protection Switching in Hybrid Hollow-Core and Single-Mode Fiber Networks: Challenges, Analysis, and Mitigation Strategies

    ——, “Protection switching in hybrid hollow-core and single-mode fiber networks: Challenges, analysis, and mitigation strategies,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23554

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    Optimal placement of hollow-core fiber spans in optical transport networks with capex constraints,

    J. Pedro, B. Correia, and D. Morão, “Optimal placement of hollow-core fiber spans in optical transport networks with capex constraints,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), 2026, paper W1H.2

    work page 2026

  55. [55]

    Physical layer standardization for ai data centers: Challenges, progress, and perspectives,

    M. G. Saber and Z. Jiang, “Physical layer standardization for ai data centers: Challenges, progress, and perspectives,” IEEE Network, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 147–155, 2026

    work page 2026

  56. [56]

    Suitability of hollow-core fibre for data-and-power-over-fibre systems,

    D. McCulloch, K. Bottrill, Y . Jung, G. T. Jasion, H. Sakr, F. Poletti, and P. Petropoulos, “Suitability of hollow-core fibre for data-and-power-over-fibre systems,”Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 5179–5185, 2026

    work page 2026

  57. [57]

    Rethinking quantum networking with advances in fiber technology,

    P. Mantri, M. S. Bullock, A. Tripathiet al., “Rethinking quantum networking with advances in fiber technology,” arXiv:2603.23718, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026