Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 59 references

Visualizing modified spin-wave wavefronts near magnetic defects and domains using nitrogen-vacancy centers

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read NV centers image spin waves bent by magnetic defects and domains

desk verdict NV-center imaging of spin-wave scattering near defects and zig-zag wavefronts in stripe domains — real new observations, but the experimental-simulation link needs tightening read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06941 v1 pith:HVYIDM55 submitted 2026-07-08 cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

Wenxin Cheng , Chang Liu , Dekun Shen , Jiaxin Li , Shangyuan Wang , Hongyu Wang , Miming Cai , Jihao Xia
show 7 more authors
Peng Chen Caihua Wan Ka Shen Xiufeng Han Yuelin Zhang Jinxing Zhang Yangmu Li
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph PACS 75.30.Ds76.30.Mi75.60.Ch75.78.Cd
keywords spinwavesnitrogen-vacancycentersmagneticimagingmagnonicsdomainswavefrontengineeringYIGLSMO
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The author is trying to establish that scanning nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center spectroscopy, previously demonstrated for spin-wave imaging in uniform magnets, can be extended to directly visualize how spin-wave wavefronts are reshaped by non-uniform magnetic structures — both localized point defects and extended domain patterns. The central object is the spin-wave wavefront: its phase and amplitude, measured through the NV center's photoluminescence contrast, which encodes the local spin-wave field via a generalized Rabi frequency. The paper demonstrates two distinct modification mechanisms. First, in yttrium-iron-garnet (YIG) films, point-like magnetic scatterers produce wavelength-dependent scattering: when the spin-wave wavelength is comparable to the scatterer's size, prominent wavefront bending and interference patterns appear; when the wavelength is much larger, the wave passes through largely undistorted. Second, in lanthanum strontium manganese oxide (LSMO) films hosting antiferromagnetically coupled stripe domains, the authors discover a zig-zag spin-wave wavefront that arises because adjacent stripes with opposite magnetization directions force different phase-gradient directions to satisfy both phase continuity and the dispersion relation at domain boundaries. Both effects are confirmed by micromagnetic simulations and analytical Green's function calculations. If correct, this means the magnetic microstructure of a film can serve as a designable element for shaping spin-wave propagation, and NV-center imaging provides the tool to verify and optimize such designs.

What carries the argument

The NV center detects spin waves through the generalized Rabi frequency Omega(rho), which depends on the interference between a spatially uniform microwave reference field and the spin-wave's oscillating stray field. The photoluminescence contrast at each pixel encodes this interference, from which the local spin-wave phase is extracted. For materials with magnetic domains, the local resonance frequency shifts position-by-position, so a full frequency scan at each pixel is used to isolate the spin-wave signal from static domain contributions. The Riesz transform (two-dimensional Hilbert transform) is used to extract local phase from the photoluminescence contrast when the wavefront has a non

What would settle it

If a systematic measurement of scattered spin-wave amplitude versus scattering angle and defect size failed to match the Green's function prediction in Eq. (5), or if the zig-zag wavefront in LSMO were shown to arise from an experimental artifact (e.g., standing-wave resonance or antenna coupling) rather than the intrinsic phase-continuity constraint at domain boundaries, the central claims would be undermined.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that NV-center spectroscopy can directly visualize spin-wave wavefront modifications caused by complex magnetic structures in real space. In YIG, point-like magnetic scatterers act as secondary radiation sources whose scattering strength is governed by the ratio of scatterer size to spin-wave wavelength, producing wavelength-dependent filtering and interference. In LSMO, antiferromagnetically coupled stripe domains intrinsically produce a zig-zag wavefront because adjacent stripes with opposite magnetization require opposite phase-gradient directions to maintain phase continuity at boundaries. The zig-zag distortion is shown by micromagnetic simulation to be robust — it

Load-bearing premise

The analytical scattering model approximates each magnetic point scatterer as a secondary radiation source with a specific mathematical form, and the validity of the predicted phase shifts and interference patterns depends on this approximation faithfully representing the real defect geometry — something the paper verifies only through qualitative visual comparison with measured images.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Magnetic defects and domain patterns can be deliberately engineered to filter, redirect, or phase-shift spin waves, enabling reconfigurable magnonic devices whose behavior is directly verifiable by NV imaging.
  • The wavelength-dependent scattering criterion — defect size comparable to spin-wave wavelength — provides a concrete design rule for selecting which spin-wave modes are transmitted or blocked by a given magnetic texture.
  • The zig-zag wavefront in antiferromagnetically coupled stripe domains suggests that coupled magnetic textures can serve as natural phase modulators, with the modulation geometry determined by the domain pattern.
  • NV-center spectroscopy can be applied to a broader class of non-uniform magnetic materials, including those with skyrmions, vortex cores, or other topological textures, where spin-wave modification is expected but not yet directly imaged.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the zig-zag wavefront is truly intrinsic to antiferromagnetically coupled stripe domains, then other coupled-domain geometries — such as checkerboard patterns, labyrinth domains, or bubble domains — should produce their own characteristic wavefront modifications predictable from the same phase-continuity argument.
  • The scattering model's Gaussian-decay form for point scatterers could be tested more rigorously by systematically varying defect size and shape and measuring the angular dependence of scattered wave amplitude against the Green's function prediction, which the current work does not do quantitatively.
  • Off-resonance NV imaging and quantum noise spectroscopy, mentioned by the authors as future directions, could extend the accessible frequency range to probe edge modes in stripe domains that the current resonance-based method cannot reach.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports scanning nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center spectroscopy imaging of spin-wave propagation in two magnetic film systems: yttrium-iron-garnet (YIG) and lanthanum strontium manganese oxide (LSMO). In YIG, the authors visualize wavelength-dependent scattering and interference of spin waves near point-like magnetic defects, supported by an analytical Green's function model (Eq. 5). In LSMO, they image spin waves traversing antiferromagnetically coupled stripe domains and observe a zig-zag wavefront distortion, which they attribute to the intrinsic phase structure of spin-wave modes in adjacent domains with opposite magnetization. Micromagnetic simulations (Mumax3) reproduce the zig-zag wavefront directly from the simulated dynamic magnetization components. The work extends NV-center spin-wave imaging beyond uniform magnets and demonstrates the technique's applicability to complex magnetic textures.

Significance. The direct real-space imaging of spin-wave wavefronts near defects and within domain structures is a valuable contribution to magnonics. The use of NV-center spectroscopy to simultaneously map magnetic textures and spin-wave phase is a genuine methodological strength. The micromagnetic simulations use independently measured material parameters and are shown to be robust to 20% parameter variation, which lends credibility to the zig-zag wavefront interpretation. The analytical scattering model provides a falsifiable, parameter-light framework for the YIG results. The observation of a zig-zag wavefront intrinsic to stripe domains, if confirmed, has implications for spin-wave guiding in patterned magnetic structures.

major comments (2)
  1. The central LSMO claim — that the zig-zag wavefront is an intrinsic spin-wave property — rests on two pillars: (1) experimental extraction via the Riesz transform of PL contrast measured at position-dependent ω_local, and (2) micromagnetic simulation showing the zig-zag directly in the phase map (Fig. 4e). The concern is at the junction of these pillars. The ±7 G field shift between neighboring stripes (page 6) means the NV resonance condition differs between domains, so the PL contrast at ω_local is sampled at different points on the resonance curve in adjacent domains. If the resonance lineshape has asymmetric tails or if ω_local is imperfectly determined at each pixel, the Riesz-transformed phase could acquire a systematic domain-boundary-synchronized artifact that mimics a zig-zag. The paper does not show the result at a single global frequency for direct comparison, nor does it show
  2. The forward-modeling from simulation to expected NV signal (Supplementary Fig. S5) is described only as 'qualitatively consistent' (page 7). Given that the simulation directly computes phase from m_x/m_y without NV artifacts, a more quantitative comparison — e.g., overlaying line cuts of simulated and experimental phase maps, or computing a correlation metric — would substantially strengthen the claim that the experimental and simulated zig-zag patterns share the same physical origin rather than merely appearing similar. As it stands, the experimental-simulation link is the weak joint in the argument.
minor comments (6)
  1. The abstract uses the term 'wavelength-dependent spin-wave filtering effect' for the YIG results, but the manuscript text (page 4–5) describes scattering and interference rather than filtering per se. Clarifying whether 'filtering' refers to the wavelength-dependent transmission or to the interference pattern would improve precision.
  2. Eq. (2): the expression for the generalized Rabi frequency Ω is dense and the roles of the reference field B_ref and spin-wave field B_SW in producing the interference could be stated more explicitly. A brief sentence summarizing the physical origin of the contrast modulation would aid readability.
  3. The stand-off distance d is estimated as 50–100 nm (page 7) but also appears as a parameter in Eq. (2). Clarifying whether d was fit or independently measured, and how its uncertainty affects the extracted phase, would be helpful.
  4. Fig. 2(c): the calculated scattered spin-wave pattern is shown, but the parameters used (scatterer size r, wavelength) are not stated in the caption. Including these would make the comparison with panels (a) and (b) more transparent.
  5. The phrase 'The motion of ferromagnetic scattering centers and antiferromagnetically coupled stripe domains is negligible during the experiment' (page 2) should be supported by a brief statement of the measurement timescale or a domain stability check.
  6. References [13] and [14] appear to be very recent (2025) preprints/articles. If they are not yet published, the preprint DOI or 'in press' status should be noted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: experimental observations are direct measurements, simulations use independently measured parameters, and the analytical model is a forward calculation not fitted to its own outputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The experimental PL contrast images are direct NV-center measurements independent of the analytical or simulation models. The micromagnetic simulations (Fig. 4) use independently measured material parameters (M_S = 475 kA/m, A_ex = 1.94 pJ/m, D_ind = 0.1 mJ/m², K_u = 27 kJ/m³) and are shown to be robust to 20% parameter variation, with the zig-zag wavefront emerging directly from arctan(m_y/m_x) without fitting to experimental images. The analytical scattering model (Eq. 5) is a forward Green's function calculation from an assumed source term (Eq. 4), not a fit to data that is then re-predicted. The forward-modeling from simulation to expected NV signal (Supplementary Fig. S5) is described as 'qualitatively consistent,' which is a weakness in the experimental-simulation link but not circularity — the simulation result is computed independently and compared, not defined in terms of the experiment. Self-citations (Refs. 28, 48, 55) provide context and prior measurements but are not load-bearing for the central derivation: the zig-zag wavefront in simulation arises from the LLG equation with stated parameters, not from importing a prior result as an axiom. The reader's concern about systematic phase artifacts at domain boundaries is a correctness risk, not a circularity — the Riesz transform procedure extracts phase from measured data, it does not define the phase in terms of itself.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or postulated particles. The free parameters are experimental quantities (stand-off distance, scatterer size) and model parameters (polarization factor, contrast coefficient) that are either estimated or measured but not independently calibrated. The axioms are domain assumptions about the experimental and modeling framework, with one ad-hoc modeling choice (Gaussian scatterer profile) that is specific to this paper's analytical treatment.

free parameters (4)
  • Stand-off distance d = 50-100 nm (estimated range)
    NV-to-film distance is estimated rather than independently measured; it enters the spin-wave field amplitude B_SW in Eq. 2 and affects sensitivity optimization.
  • Scatterer size r = Measured from zoomed-in images (value not stated)
    Enters the analytical scattering model (Eq. 5) as the Gaussian width of the secondary source; directly controls predicted scattering strength.
  • Polarization factor ι = 0 to 1 (range stated, specific value not given)
    Enters the magnetization expression (Eq. 1); affects the relationship between measured PL contrast and spin-wave amplitude.
  • PL contrast coefficient C = ~0.15
    Stated as typical value; laser and microwave power dependence noted but neglected in Eq. 3.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The reference microwave field in air is spatially uniform in phase over the imaging area
    Stated in the experimental setup section: 'it can be considered as an electromagnetic field that is spatially uniform in phase but time-dependent.' This underpins the phase extraction from PL contrast.
  • ad hoc to paper Magnetic point scatterers act as secondary radiation sources with Gaussian spatial profile
    Eq. 4-5 model the scatterer as m_scat = m_0 * exp(-ρ²/2r²) * exp(ik·ρ), which is an assumed form for the impurity source in the divergence equation.
  • domain assumption The Riesz transform correctly extracts local spin-wave phase from PL contrast in the presence of inhomogeneous backgrounds
    Invoked when solving the multiple-value phase problem near domains; derivation deferred to supplementary materials.
  • domain assumption Quasi-static approximation for defects and domains
    The paper states 'the motion of ferromagnetic scattering centers and antiferromagnetically coupled stripe domains is negligible during the experiment.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Visualizing modified spin-wave wavefronts near magnetic defects and domains using nitrogen-vacancy centers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HVYIDM55

@misc{pith2026260706941,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Visualizing modified spin-wave wavefronts near magnetic defects and domains using nitrogen-vacancy centers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HVYIDM55}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06941}
}
read the original abstract

Direct, real-space imaging of spin-wave propagation and wavefronts in magnetic materials is crucial for advancing both fundamental understanding of spin dynamics and the development of functional devices. This, however, remains a significant challenge, especially in materials with complex magnetic characteristics at the nanoscale. Here, we employ scanning nitrogen-vacancy center spectroscopy to achieve visualization of spin waves in two archetypical magnetic films: yttrium-iron-garnet and lanthanum strontium manganese oxide. We reveal a wavelength-dependent spin-wave filtering effect near point-like magnetic scatterers and a modified spin wavefront in antiferromagnetically coupled stripe domains. The spin-wave characteristics are explained using micromagnetic simulations and analytical calculations. These findings point to possible fine control of spin-wave propagation near complex magnetic structures and extend the scope of spin-wave imaging based on nitrogen-vacancy centers beyond uniform magnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06941 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative spin-wave and magnetic domain images of YIG and LSMO. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup. SW and MW label the spin-wave signal and microwave, respectively. (b) PL image of spin waves in the YIG film, acquired at a resonance frequency of external field, approximately 2335 MHz. (c) LSMO antiferromagnetically coupled stripe domains measured by a magnetic force microscope. (d) PL image of spin waves … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Images of spin waves in the YIG film near magnetic point scatterers. (a) Spin waves with varied incident wavelengths near a single magnetic scatterer. Measured at frequencies of approximately 2321, 2267, 2158 MHz. (b) Spin waves with varied incident wavelengths near two magnetic scatterers. Measured at frequencies of approximately 2392, 2338, 2282 MHz. Dashed circles indicate the positions of the scatterers. Black b… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. NV measurements of antiferromagnetically coupled stripe domains and spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Micromagnetic simulation and calculations. (a) Simulated ground state magnetization 𝑀𝑀Z, showing the formation of stripe domains. (b, c) Simulated dynamic magnetization components 𝑚𝑚𝑥𝑥 and 𝑚𝑚y originating from spin-wave propagation at an arbitrary time, generated via t…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wagner, A

    K. Wagner, A. Kákay, K. Schultheiss, A. Henschke, T. Sebastian, and H. Schultheiss, Magnetic domain walls as reconfigurable spin-wave nanochannels, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 432 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    H. Yu, J. Xiao, and H. Schultheiss, Magnetic texture based magnonics, Phys. Rep. 905, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    H. Y . Yuan, Y . Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P . Yan, Quantum magnonics: when magnon spintronics meets quantum information science. Phys. Rep. 965, 1-74 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    A. V . Chumak, V . I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys. 11, 453 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Grundler, Nanomagnonics around the corner, Nat

    D. Grundler, Nanomagnonics around the corner, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 407 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Khitun, M

    A. Khitun, M. Bao, and K. L. Wang, Magnonic logic circuits, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 264005 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Haldar, D

    A. Haldar, D. Kumar, and A. O. Adeyeye, A reconfigurable waveguide for energy- efficient transmission and local manipulation of information in a nanomagnetic device, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 437 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    V . V . Kruglyak, S. O. Demokritov, and D. Grundler, Magnonics, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 264001 (2010)

    work page 2010

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    A. A. Serga, A. V . Chumak, and B. Hillebrands, YIG magnonics, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 264002 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Baltz, A

    V . Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y . Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    S.-H. Yang, R. Naaman, Y . Paltiel, and S. S. P . Parkin, Chiral spintronics, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 328 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Mudhafer, M

    A. Mudhafer, M. A. Najdi, R. M. Shaaban, N. J.Jassim, A. Ateeq, and M. T. Alshamkhani, Transformations of Stripy Magnetic Spin Texture: A Mini Review, Physica B: Condensed Matter 417886 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Y . Zhou, S. Li, X. Liang, and Y . Zhou, Topological Spin Textures: Basic Physics and Devices, Adv. Mater. 37, 2312935 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 8, 101 (1935)

    1935

  8. [16]

    T. L. Gilbert, Classics in Magnetics A Phenomenological Theory of Damping in Ferromagnetic Materials, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 3443 (2004)

    2004

  9. [17]

    Krčma, O

    J. Krčma, O. Wojewoda, M. Hrtoň, J. Holobrádek, J. A. Arregi, J. Panda, E. Pribytova, and M. Urbánek, Mie-enhanced microfocused brillouin light scattering for full wave vector resolution of nanoscale spin waves, Sci. Adv. 11, eady8833 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Wintz, V

    S. Wintz, V . Tiberkevich, M. Weigand, J. Raabe, J. Lindner, A. Erbe, A. Slavin, and J. Fassbender, Magnetic vortex cores as tunable spin- wave emitters, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 948 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Sluka, T

    V . Sluka, T. Schneider, R. A. Gallardo, A. Kákay, M. Weigand, T. Warnatz, R. Mattheis, A. Roldán-Molina, P. Landeros, V . Tiberkevich, A. Slavin, G. Schütz, A. Erbe, A. Deac, J. Lindner, J. Raabe, J. Fassbender, and S. Wintz, Emission and propagation of 1D and 2D spin waves w...

    2019

  12. [20]

    Albisetti, S

    E. Albisetti, S. Tacchi, R. Silvani, G. Scaramuzzi, S. Finizio, S. Wintz, C. Rinaldi, M. Cantoni, 14 J. Raabe, G. Carlotti, R. Bertacco, E. Riedo, and D. Petti, Optically inspired nanomagnonics with nonreciprocal spin waves in synthetic antiferromagnets, Adv. Mater. 32, 1906439 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Zhang, L

    X.-X. Zhang, L. Li, D. Weber, J. Goldberger, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Gate-tunable spin waves in antiferromagnetic atomic bilayers, Nat. Mater. 19, 838 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    J.-H. Park, E. Vescovo, H.-J. Kim, C. Kwon, R. Ramesh, and T. Venkatesan, Direct evidence for a half-metallic ferromagnet, Nature 392, 794 (1998)

    1998

  15. [23]

    Bowen, M

    M. Bowen, M. Bibes, A. Barthélémy, J.-P. Contour, A. Anane, Y . Lemaı̂tre, and A. Fert, Nearly total spin polarization in La2/3Sr1/3MnO3 from tunneling experiments, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 233 (2003)

    2003

  16. [24]

    Y . Zhou, T. Guo, L. Han, L. Liao, W. He, C. Wan, C. Chen, Q. Wang, L. Qiao, H. Bai, W. Zhu, Y . Zhang, R. Chen, X. Han, F. Pan, and C. Song, Spin- torque–driven antiferromagnetic resonance, Sci. Adv. 10, eadk7935 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Y . Z. Wang, T. Y . Zhang, J. Dong, P. Chen, G. Q. Yu, C. H. Wan, and X. F. Han, V oltage - Controlled Magnon Transistor via Tuning Interfacial Exchange Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 076701 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    J. Wang, H. Wang, J. Chen, W. Legrand, P. Chen, L. Sheng, J. Xia, G. Lan, Y . Zhang, R. Y uan, J. Dong, X. Han, J.- P. Ansermet, and H. Yu, Broad- wave-vector spin pumping of flat -band magnons, Phys. Rev. Applied 21, 044024 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Zhang, J

    Y . Zhang, J. Liu, Y . Dong, S. Wu, J. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Lu, A. Rückriegel, H. Wang, R. Duine, H. Y u, Z. Luo, K. Shen, and J. Zhang, Strain- Driven Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction for Room-Temperature Magnetic Skyrmions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 117204 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Zhang, L

    Y . Zhang, L. Qiu, J. Chen, S. Wu, H. Wang, I. A. Malik, M. Cai, M. Wu, P. Gao, C. Hua, W. Yu, J. Xiao, Y . Jiang, H. Y u, K. Shen, and J. Zhang, Switchable long-distance propagation of chiral magnonic edge states, Nat. Mater. 24, 69 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Q. Qin, S. He, W. Song, P. Yang, Q. Wu, Y . P. Feng, and J. Chen, Ultra-low magnetic damping of perovskite La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 thin films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 112401 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    M. Cai, S. Wang, Y . Zhang, X. Bao, D. Shen, J. Ren, L. Qiu, H. Yu, Z. Luo, M. Kläui, S. Zhang, N. Jaouen, G. Van Der Laan, T. Hesjedal, K. Shen, and J. Zhang, Stabilization and Observation of Large-Area Ferromagnetic Bimeron Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 116703 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    C. Liu, S. Wu, J. Zhang, J. Chen, J. Ding, J. Ma, Y . Zhang, Y . Sun, S. Tu, H. Wang, P. Liu, C. Li, Y . Jiang, P. Gao, D. Yu, J. Xiao, R. Duine, M. Wu, C.-W. Nan, J. Zhang, and H. Yu, Current- controlled propagation of spin waves in antiparallel, coupled dom ains, Nat. Nanote...

    2019

  24. [32]

    Gruber, A

    A. Gruber, A. Dräbenstedt, C. Tietz, L. Fleury, J. Wrachtrup, and C. V . Borczyskowski, Scanning Confocal Optical Microscopy and Magnetic Resonance on Single Defect Centers, Science 276, 2012 (1997)

    2012

  25. [33]

    M. Guo, M. Wang, P. Wang, D. Wu, X. Ye, P. Y u, Y . Huang, F. Shi, Y . Wang, and J. Du, A flexible nitrogen -vacancy center probe for scanning magnetometry, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92, 055001 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Y . Li, C. Liu, W. Cheng, and J. Li, Multiscale Approach for Unconventional Superconductors, Electromag. Sci. 2, 1 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Rondin, J.-P

    L. Rondin, J.-P. Tetienne, T. Hingant, J.-F. Roch, P. Maletinsky, and V . Jacques, Magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 056503 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    E. V . Levine, M. J. Turner, P . Kehayias, C. A. Hart, N. Langellier, R. Trubko, D. R. Glenn, R. 15 R. Fu, and R. L. Walsworth, Principles and techniques of the quantum diamond microscope, Nanophotonics 8, 1945 (2019)

    1945

  29. [37]

    J. Du, F. Shi, X. Kong, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Single-molecule scale magnetic resonance spectroscopy using quantum diamond sensors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 025001 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    See Supplemental Materials at [Url] for the experimental details, micromagnetic simulations and analysis, which Includes Refs. [39–45]

  31. [39]

    B. A. Kalinikos and A. N. Slavin, Theory of dipole -exchange spin wave spectrum for ferromagnetic films with mixed exchange boundary conditions, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 19, 7013 (1986)

    1986

  32. [40]

    Donahue, Object-Oriented Micromagnetics Modeling Framework (OOMMF) , https://doi.org/10.18434/T4/1502495

    M. Donahue, Object-Oriented Micromagnetics Modeling Framework (OOMMF) , https://doi.org/10.18434/T4/1502495

    doi

  33. [41]

    Venkat, D

    G. Venkat, D. Kumar, M. Franchin, O. Dmytriiev, M. Mruczkiewicz, H. Fangohr, A. Barman, M. Krawczyk, and A. Prabhakar, Proposal for a standard micromagnetic problem: Spin wave dispersion in a magnonic waveguide, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 524 (2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    Z. Ren, L. Jin, T. Wen, Y . Liao, X. Tang, H. Zhang, and Z. Zhong, MuFA (multi-type fourier analyzer): A tool for batch generation of MuMax3 input scripts and multi-type fourier analysis from micromagnetic simulation output data, Comput. Phys. Commun. 244, 311 (2019). [43]M. B...

    2019

  35. [43]

    Gruszecki, M

    P. Gruszecki, M. Kasprzak, A. E. Serebryannikov, M. Krawczyk, and W. Śmigaj, Microwave excitation of spin wave beams in thin ferromagnetic films, Sci. Rep. 6, 22367 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    Zhang, T

    Y . Zhang, T. Yu, J. Chen, Y . Zhang, J. Feng, S. Tu, and H. Yu, Antenna design for propagating spin wave spectroscopy in ferromagnetic thin films, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 450, 24 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Borst, P

    M. Borst, P. H. Vree, A. Lowther, A. Teepe, S. Kurdi, I. Bertelli, B. G. Simon, Y . M. Blanter, and T. van der Sar, Observation and control of hybrid spin- wave–Meissner-current transport modes, Science 382, 430 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Bertelli, J

    I. Bertelli, J. J. Carmiggelt, T. Yu, B. G. Simon, C. C. Pothoven, G. E. W. Bauer, Y . M. Blanter, J. Aarts, and T. Van Der Sar, Magnetic resonance imaging of spin- wave transport and interference in a magnetic insulator, Sci. Adv. 6, eabd3556 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    T. X. Zhou, J. J. Carmiggelt, L. M. Gächter, I. Esterlis, D. Sels, R. J. Stöhr, C. Du, D. Fernandez, J. F. Rodriguez-Nieva, F. Büttner, E. Demler, and A. Yacoby, A magnon scattering platform, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2019473118 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    B. G. Simon, S. Kurdi, J. J. Carmiggelt, M. Borst, A. J. Katan, and T. Van Der Sar, Filtering and Imaging of Frequency- Degenerate Spin Waves Using Nanopositioning of a Single -Spin Sensor, Nano Lett. 22, 9198 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Bertelli, B

    I. Bertelli, B. G. Simon, T. Yu, J. Aarts, G. E. W. Bauer, Y . M. Blanter, and T. Van Der Sar, Imaging Spin ‐Wave Damping Underneath Metals Using Electron Spins in Diamond, Adv . Quantum Tech. 4, 2100094 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    Timalsina, H

    R. Timalsina, H. Wang, B. Giri, A. Erickson, X. Xu, and A. Laraoui, Mapping of Spin‐Wave Transport in Thulium Iron Garnet Thin Films Using Diamond Quantum Microscopy, Adv. Elect. Materials 10, 2300648 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Lüthi, L

    C. Lüthi, L. Colombo, F. Vilsmeier, and C. Back, Long-range spin wave imaging with nitrogen vacancy centers and time resolved magneto -optical measurements, Review of Scientific Instruments 96, 033703 (2025). 16

    2025

  44. [52]

    Ogawa, M

    K. Ogawa, M. Tsukamoto, Y . Mori, D. Takafuji, J. Shiogai, K. Ueda, J. Matsuno, K. Sasaki, and K. Kobayashi, Wideband wide -field imaging of spin -wave propagation using diamond quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. Applied 23, 054001 (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Dréau, M

    A. Dréau, M. Lesik, L. Rondin, P. Spinicelli, O. Arcizet, J.-F. Roch, and V . Jacques, Avoiding power broadening in optically detected magnetic resonance of single NV defects for enhanced dc magnetic field sensitivity, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195204 (2011)

    2011

  46. [54]

    H. Wang, M. Madami, J. Chen, H. Jia, Y . Zhang, R. Yuan, Y . Wang, W. He, L. Sheng, Y . Zhang, J. Wang, S. Liu, K. Shen, G. Yu, X. Han, D. Y u, J.- P. Ansermet, G. Gubbiotti, and H. Yu, Observation of Spin-Wave Moiré Edge and Cavity Modes in Twisted Magnetic Lattices, Phys. Re...

    2023

  47. [55]

    Stigloher, M

    J. Stigloher, M. Decker, H. S. Körner, K. Tanabe, T. Moriyama, T. Taniguchi, H. Hata, M. Madami, G. Gubbiotti, K. Kobayashi, T. Ono, and C. H. Back, Snell’s law for spin waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 037204 (2016)

    2016

  48. [56]

    Loayza, M

    N. Loayza, M. B. Jungfleisch, A. Hoffmann, M. Bailleul, and V . Vlaminck, Fresnel diffraction of spin waves, Phys. Rev. B 98, 144430 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia -Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, The design and verification of MuMax3, AIP Advances 4, 107133 (2014)

    2014

  50. [58]

    Li, C.-J

    R. Li, C.-J. Wang, Z. Cheng, P. Wang, Y . Wang, C. Duan, H. Liu, F. Shi, and J. Du, Wideband microwave magnetometry using a nitrogen- vacancy center in diamond, Phys. Rev. A 99, 062328 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    Ogawa, S

    K. Ogawa, S. Nishimura, K. Sasaki, and K. Kobayashi, Demonstration of highly sensitive wideband microwave sensing using ensemble nitrogen-vacancy centers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 214002 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.