Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 82 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

NLO QCD corrections pin down 26 of 41 new-physics directions in B decays

2026-07-09 17:30 UTC pith:5HADYMCH

load-bearing objection Letter to colleague on arXiv:2607.07198 the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.07198 v1 pith:5HADYMCH submitted 2026-07-08 hep-ph hep-exhep-lat

Inclusive Charmless Non-Leptonic B Decays at NLO within and beyond the Standard Model

Stefan Meiser , Pol Morell , Angel Picazo , Javier Virto This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-exhep-lat PACS 12.60.-i13.25.Hw12.39.Hg
keywords charmlessnon-leptonicdecaysdiagramsinclusiveanomaliesbeyondcalculate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes, for the first time, the complete next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to the inclusive charmless non-leptonic b-quark decay rate in the full Weak Effective Theory operator basis — all 82 operators beyond the Standard Model, including current-current, penguin-penguin, penguin-dipole, and dipole-dipole diagram topologies with two-, three-, and four-particle final-state cuts. The result is a 41×41 matrix (one entry per pair of Wilson coefficients) that, when compared against the measured non-leptonic B-meson decay width, constrains 26 of 41 independent directions in new-physics parameter space. At leading order only 25 directions were bounded; the NLO calculation adds one new constrained direction (dominated by the chromomagnetic dipole operator) and stabilizes the existing bounds against further perturbative corrections. The key technical obstacle is handling Dirac traces involving γ5 in dimensional regularization, which the authors circumvent by working in the Bern operator basis — a basis whose structure avoids ambiguous γ5 traces at the cost of substantially more complex algebra, managed with specialized symbolic computation tools.

Core claim

The central result is that the NLO QCD corrections to charmless non-leptonic b-quark decay produce a finite, UV-renormalized 41×41 rate matrix that constrains 26 of 41 Wilson-coefficient directions when compared to the experimental non-leptonic B-meson lifetime. The NLO corrections do not destabilize the leading-order bounds; instead they stabilize them and introduce one genuinely new constrained direction involving the chromomagnetic dipole operator and four-quark operators with bb-flavor content (Eq. 5.7). This stability validates the use of inclusive lifetimes as complementary constraints on new physics in the b→d sector, analogous to what was previously demonstrated for b→c transitions.

What carries the argument

The calculation proceeds via the optical theorem: the decay rate is the imaginary part of forward-scattering double-insertions of the effective Lagrangian, evaluated by applying Cutkosky rules to convert loop diagrams into phase-space integrals. The 41×41 rate matrix G[d̄qq] decomposes into current-current (CC) blocks computed at tree-level and one-loop, plus penguin-penguin (PP), penguin-dipole (PD), and dipole-dipole (DD) blocks entering at one-loop order. The Bern operator basis eliminates γ5 ambiguities by construction — its operators carry no γ5 in one of the two Dirac currents, so at most one trace with γ5 can appear and parity-odd contributions are discarded. IR divergences from three

Load-bearing premise

The phenomenological bounds rest on demanding that the sum of charmless decay widths not exceed the total measured non-leptonic B-meson width. Since charmful channels (notably b→d̄cc) are excluded, this is a necessary but loose inequality, and the eigenvalue spectrum of the incomplete rate matrix could shift when those channels are added.

What would settle it

If including the b→d̄cc NLO contributions or NNLO corrections (such as dgg cuts) were to drastically alter the eigenvalue spectrum — for instance, by flipping the sign of several eigenvalues or collapsing multiple constrained directions — the claim that LO bounds are stable under higher-order corrections would fail.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The 26 constrained directions can serve as priors in global BSM fits, cutting off otherwise unconstrained flat directions in Wilson-coefficient space that other observables (exclusive decays, semi-leptonic rates) leave open.
  • Including the b→d̄cc channel at NLO — the natural next step the authors identify — would stabilize the 10 currently unstable directions involving dbcc operators, potentially constraining all 41 directions.
  • The results, currently in the Bern basis, need translation to the JMS basis to integrate into the automated NLO/NNLL SMEFT-to-LEFT pipeline used by the broader community.
  • Subtracting Standard Model predictions for channels where new physics does not contribute would tighten the inequality bound substantially, making the constraints more competitive with exclusive-observable bounds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a complete NLO QCD calculation of the inclusive charmless non-leptonic b-quark decay rate within the Weak Effective Theory (WET), including all 82 BSM operators (41 physical + 41 chirality-flipped). The computation covers current-current (CC), penguin-penguin (PP), penguin-dipole (PD), and dipole-dipole (DD) topologies with two-, three-, and four-particle cuts. The results are presented as explicit matrices in the Bern operator basis, and their phenomenological impact is assessed by comparing the computed decay rate to the experimental non-leptonic B-meson width, yielding constraints on 26 of 41 Wilson coefficient directions. The calculation is cross-checked against known LO limits, counterterm matrices reproduce known anomalous dimensions, and an independent calculation in a different basis is mentioned as ongoing.

Significance. This is a substantial technical achievement. The complete NLO computation of inclusive non-leptonic B-decay rates in the full BSM WET operator basis has not been available before. The provision of results in machine-readable format (ancillary Mathematica file) is a valuable community resource. The multiple cross-checks — LO limits matching Refs. [36,39], counterterm matrices reproducing ADMs from Ref. [44], and the independent basis calculation [63] — provide meaningful validation of the technical core. The phenomenological analysis, while preliminary in nature, demonstrates the utility of the results for constraining new-physics scenarios.

major comments (2)
  1. Section 5.1: The combined matrix Ĝ[d̄qq] is reported to have negative eigenvalues for directions involving dbcc and dbbb operators. The authors handle this by manually setting Cdbcc_i = Cdbbb_i = 0 (except C⋆), effectively removing those rows and columns. While the physical reasoning (these directions are constrained by charmful cuts not included here) is sound, the '26 out of 41 constrained directions' count is conditional on this surgical removal and will change when charmful NLO corrections are included. The paper acknowledges this, but the abstract and conclusions could more clearly state that the '26 directions' is an intermediate result specific to the charmless-only matrix, not a final statement about the full WET parameter space. Adding a sentence to this effect would improve precision without diminishing the contribution.
  2. Section 5.1, Fig. 9 and surrounding text: The scale dependence analysis shows no clear pattern of improvement at NLO — about half the bounds are more stable, the rest acquire larger scale dependence, and λ⋆ has much higher scale dependence than any other eigenvalue. The authors note that RG evolution of Wilson coefficients and a better mass scheme could modify this. However, the current presentation makes it difficult to assess whether the NLO calculation has actually improved the theoretical precision. A more targeted discussion — for instance, comparing the scale dependence of the total decay rate (summed over all channels) at LO vs. NLO for a representative Wilson coefficient choice, rather than individual eigenvalues — would strengthen the paper.
minor comments (7)
  1. Eq. (2.6): The compact notation CdbX_i bundles 41 Wilson coefficients from different flavor sectors. A brief explicit listing of the ordering (e.g., as a footnote or inline enumeration) would help readers cross-reference with the matrices in Section 4 and the ancillary file.
  2. Section 3.2, second paragraph: The statement 'a single Dirac trace with an odd number of γ5 is not [parity-even]' could benefit from a one-line clarification or reference for why this suffices to discard such terms, for readers less familiar with the NDR γ5 problem.
  3. Eq. (5.4): The experimental non-leptonic width uses Γ(B−) from the PDG. The footnote explains that B− gives the most constraining bound, but it would be useful to state the numerical values for B0 and Bs as well, or at least the range, to quantify how weak the dependence is.
  4. Fig. 10: The two-dimensional projections are informative but the axes labels (e.g., 'Cdbuu_5 - Cdbdd_7 plane') could be more explicit about the normalization and whether the displayed coefficients are real parts or magnitudes.
  5. Appendix A: The modified Cutkosky rules with the Z_OS/Z_MS factor are well-derived, but a brief comment on how this interacts with the IR regulator in dimensional regularization (mentioned in footnote 3) would help readers who wish to reproduce the calculation.
  6. Typo: In Eq. (4.16) and similar dipole-interference blocks, the factor 1/α̃_s is noted but the text below Eq. (4.16) refers to 'tipically' (should be 'typically'). A proofread of the phenomenological section would improve readability.
  7. Section 5.2: The analysis of Ĝ[d̄sd] mentions 'up to 25%' NLO corrections to eigenvalues but does not show a figure analogous to Fig. 7. A brief table or statement of the LO vs. NLO eigenvalues would make the comparison more concrete.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity found: first-principles perturbative QCD calculation with external experimental constraints

full rationale

The paper's central result—the NLO QCD correction matrices for inclusive charmless non-leptonic b-decay—is computed from first principles: cut diagrams via Cutkosky rules (Appendix A), standard Passarino-Veltman loop integrals (Appendix B), and analytic phase-space integrals (Section 3.4, Appendix C). The Wilson coefficients are free parameters throughout, never fitted to data. The phenomenological constraint (Eq. 5.5) uses an external experimental input (Γ_NL^exp from PDG, Eq. 5.4) as an upper bound on the sum of computed decay widths—this is a necessary condition, not a fit, so no prediction is forced by construction. Cross-checks are against external references: LO results match Refs. [36,39] (mc→0 limit), counterterm matrices reproduce ADMs from Ref. [44]. The in-preparation Ref. [63] by the same authors is mentioned as a supplementary cross-check in a different operator basis, but the presented results do not depend on it being completed. The '26 constrained directions' claim is transparently conditional on the incomplete matrix (charmful channels omitted), with the paper explicitly acknowledging this limitation and the instability of certain eigenvalues (Section 5.1). No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by definition, fit, or self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or postulated entities. It works entirely within the established WET operator framework. The Wilson coefficients are standard parameters of the EFT, not invented here. The Bern basis was defined in Ref. [44].

free parameters (4)
  • Wilson coefficients C_i (41 physical + 41 primed)
    These are the free parameters of the BSM WET that the calculation constrains. They are not fitted in this paper but bounded by the experimental decay width.
  • alpha_s(4 GeV) = 0.229 = 0.229
    Input from RunDec, standard external parameter.
  • mb(4 GeV) = 4.198 GeV, mc(4 GeV) = 0.939 GeV = 4.198, 0.939
    Quark masses at the renormalization scale, standard external inputs.
  • Renormalization scale mu_0 = 4 GeV = 4 GeV
    Central value choice for scale variation analysis.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Heavy Quark Expansion: Gamma(B) = Gamma(b) + O(Lambda_QCD^2/m_b^2), so the partonic decay rate approximates the meson lifetime at leading power.
    Invoked in Eq. (3.1). Standard in the field but the paper only computes leading power, with power corrections left to other methods.
  • domain assumption Dipole Wilson coefficients are suppressed by at least 1/16pi^2 relative to four-quark coefficients, justifying their treatment as NLO effects.
    Stated below Eq. (2.5). This is motivated by SMEFT matching properties but is an assumption about the UV structure of new physics.
  • standard math The MS renormalization scheme with Buras-Weisz prescription for evanescent operators is a valid scheme for NLO computations.
    Standard in the field, used in Appendix D.
  • domain assumption The experimental non-leptonic decay width Gamma_NL^exp(B-) can be approximated by Gamma(B-) - Gamma(B- -> X l nu), neglecting rare channels.
    Used in Eq. (5.4). The authors note rare channels contribute a small fraction.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 40469 in / 2738 out tokens · 324943 ms · 2026-07-09T17:30:31.838188+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We calculate the full set of BSM contributions to the inclusive non-leptonic $B$-meson lifetime from charmless final states within the framework of the Weak Effective Theory up to next-to-leading order in QCD and to leading power in the heavy-quark expansion. We do so by computing cut diagrams and the corresponding phase space integrals. This involves calculating current-current, penguin-penguin, penguin-dipole and dipole-dipole diagrams with two-, three- and four-particle cuts. We describe the technical difficulties of the computation. We then discuss how our results can be used to constrain new physics scenarios related to the anomalies observed in semi-leptonic and charmless non-leptonic decays.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 68 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Shifman and M.B

    M.A. Shifman and M.B. Voloshin, Hierarchy of Lifetimes of Charmed and Beautiful Hadrons , Sov. Phys. JETP 64 (1986) 698

    work page 1986

  3. [3]

    Lifetimes and HQE

    A. Lenz, Lifetimes and heavy quark expansion , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 (2015) 1543005 [1405.3601]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Lifetimes of $b$-hadrons and mixing of neutral $B$-mesons: theoretical and experimental status

    J. Albrecht, F. Bernlochner, A. Lenz and A. Rusov, Lifetimes of b-hadrons and mixing of neutral B-mesons: theoretical and experimental status , Eur. Phys. J. ST 233 (2024) 359 [2402.04224]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Charm Quark Mass Dependence of QCD Corrections to Nonleptonic Inclusive B Decays

    E. Bagan, P. Ball, V.M. Braun and P. Gosdzinsky, Charm quark mass dependence of QCD corrections to nonleptonic inclusive B decays , Nucl. Phys. B 432 (1994) 3 [hep-ph/9408306]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  6. [6]

    QCD radiative enhancement of the decay b -> c cbar s

    M.B. Voloshin, QCD radiative enhancement of the decay b → c¯cs, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 3948 [hep-ph/9409391]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  7. [7]

    Next-to-leading Order Radiative Corrections to the Decay $b\to ccs$

    E. Bagan, P. Ball, B. Fiol and P. Gosdzinsky, Next-to-leading order radiative corrections to the decay b → c¯cs, Phys. Lett. B 351 (1995) 546 [hep-ph/9502338]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  8. [8]

    A. Lenz, U. Nierste and G. Ostermaier, Penguin diagrams, charmless B decays and the missing charm puzzle, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 7228 [hep-ph/9706501]. – 40 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  9. [9]

    A. Lenz, U. Nierste and G. Ostermaier, Determination of the CKM angle gamma and |Vub/Vcb| from inclusive direct CP asymmetries and branching ratios in charmless B decays , Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 034008 [hep-ph/9802202]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  10. [10]

    The rare decay b--> s gluon beyond leading logarithms

    C. Greub and P. Liniger, The Rare decay b → sg beyond leading logarithms , Phys. Lett. B 494 (2000) 237 [hep-ph/0008071]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  11. [11]

    Calculation of next-to-leading QCD corrections to b -> s gluon

    C. Greub and P. Liniger, Calculation of next-to-leading QCD corrections to b → sg, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 054025 [hep-ph/0009144]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  12. [12]

    Enhancement of the hadronic b quark decays

    A. Czarnecki, M. Slusarczyk and F.V. Tkachov, Enhancement of the hadronic b quark decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 171803 [hep-ph/0511004]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  13. [13]

    The inclusive decay b to ccs revisited

    F. Krinner, A. Lenz and T. Rauh, The inclusive decay b → c¯cs revisited, Nucl. Phys. B 876 (2013) 31 [1305.5390]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    Nonleptonic $B$-meson decays to next-to-next-to-leading order

    M. Egner, M. Fael, K. Schönwald and M. Steinhauser, Nonleptonic B-meson decays to next-to-next-to-leading order, JHEP 10 (2024) 144 [2406.19456], [Erratum: JHEP 02, 147 (2025)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Two-loop QCD corrections to semileptonic b decays at maximal recoil

    A. Czarnecki and K. Melnikov, Two loop QCD corrections to semileptonic b decays at maximal recoil , Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3630 [hep-ph/9703291]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  16. [16]

    Two-loop QCD corrections to semileptonic b decays at an intermediate recoil

    A. Czarnecki and K. Melnikov, Two - loop QCD corrections to semileptonic b decays at an intermediate recoil, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 014036 [hep-ph/9804215]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  17. [17]

    The second order QCD contribution to the semileptonic b -> u decay rate

    T. van Ritbergen, The Second order QCD contribution to the semileptonic b → u decay rate, Phys. Lett. B 454 (1999) 353 [hep-ph/9903226]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  18. [18]

    O(\alpha_s^2) corrections to semileptonic decay b \to c l \bar \nu_l

    K. Melnikov, O(α2 s) corrections to semileptonic decay b → cℓ¯νℓ, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 336 [0803.0951]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  19. [19]

    Heavy-to-heavy quark decays at NNLO

    A. Pak and A. Czarnecki, Heavy-to-heavy quark decays at NNLO , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 114015 [0808.3509]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    Mass effects in muon and semileptonic b -> c decays

    A. Pak and A. Czarnecki, Mass effects in muon and semileptonic b → c decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 241807 [0803.0960]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  21. [21]

    Semi-Leptonic b-decay at Intermediate Recoil

    M. Dowling, A. Pak and A. Czarnecki, Semi-Leptonic b-decay at Intermediate Recoil , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 074029 [0809.0491]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  22. [22]

    Two-Loop QCD Corrections to the Heavy-to-Light Quark Decay

    R. Bonciani and A. Ferroglia, Two-Loop QCD Corrections to the Heavy-to-Light Quark Decay , JHEP 11 (2008) 065 [0809.4687]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    Second order QCD corrections to inclusive semileptonic b \to Xc l \bar \nu_l decays with massless and massive lepton

    S. Biswas and K. Melnikov, Second order QCD corrections to inclusive semileptonic b → Xcℓ¯νℓ decays with massless and massive lepton , JHEP 02 (2010) 089 [0911.4142]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  24. [24]

    On the $O(\alpha_s^2)$ corrections to $b \to X_u e \bar \nu$ inclusive decays

    M. Brucherseifer, F. Caola and K. Melnikov, On the O(α2 s) corrections to b → Xue¯ν inclusive decays, Phys. Lett. B 721 (2013) 107 [1302.0444]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  25. [25]

    Revisiting semileptonic $B$ meson decays at next-to-next-to-leading order

    M. Egner, M. Fael, K. Schönwald and M. Steinhauser, Revisiting semileptonic B meson decays at next-to-next-to-leading order, JHEP 09 (2023) 112 [2308.01346]. – 41 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    M. Fael, K. Schönwald and M. Steinhauser, Third order corrections to the semileptonic b → c and the muon decays, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 016003 [2011.13654]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Three-loop corrections to the muon and heavy quark decay rates

    M. Czakon, A. Czarnecki and M. Dowling, Three-loop corrections to the muon and heavy quark decay rates, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) L111301 [2104.05804]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Third order correction to semileptonic $b\to u$ decay: fermionic contributions

    M. Fael and J. Usovitsch, Third order correction to semileptonic b → u decay: Fermionic contributions , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 114026 [2310.03685]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Broggio, B

    A. Broggio, B. Capdevila, A. Ferroglia and P. Gambino, Structure functions for the inclusive semileptonic b-quark decay at NNLO: a semi-analytic calculation , 2601.15447

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    I.I.Y. Bigi, B. Blok, M.A. Shifman, N.G. Uraltsev and A.I. Vainshtein, A QCD ’manifesto’ on inclusive decays of beauty and charm , in 7th Meeting of the APS Division of Particles Fields , pp. 610–613, 11, 1992 [ hep-ph/9212227]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  31. [31]

    Spectator Effects in Inclusive Decays of Beauty Hadrons

    M. Neubert and C.T. Sachrajda, Spectator effects in inclusive decays of beauty hadrons , Nucl. Phys. B 483 (1997) 339 [hep-ph/9603202]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  32. [32]

    M. Kirk, A. Lenz and T. Rauh, Dimension-six matrix elements for meson mixing and lifetimes from sum rules , JHEP 12 (2017) 068 [1711.02100], [Erratum: JHEP 06, 162 (2020)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    Next-to-next-to-leading QCD corrections to the $\mathbf{B^+}$-$\mathbf{B_d^0}$, $\mathbf{D^+}$-$\mathbf{D^0}$, and $\mathbf{D_s^+}$-$\mathbf{D^0}$ lifetime ratios

    F. Moretti, U. Nierste, P. Reeck and M. Steinhauser, Next-to-next-to-leading QCD corrections to the B+-B0 d, D+-D0, and D+ s -D0 lifetime ratios , 2604.24841

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    A. Lenz, J. Müller, M.L. Piscopo and A.V. Rusov, Taming new physics in b → c¯ud(s) with τ (B+)/τ (Bd) and ad sl, JHEP 09 (2023) 028 [2211.02724]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    HQET sum rules for matrix elements of dimension-six four-quark operators for meson lifetimes within and beyond the Standard Model

    M. Black, M. Lang, A. Lenz and Z. Wüthrich, HQET sum rules for matrix elements of dimension-six four-quark operators for meson lifetimes within and beyond the Standard Model , JHEP 04 (2025) 081 [2412.13270]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    M. Lang, A. Lenz, A. Mohamed, M.L. Piscopo and A.V. Rusov, B-meson decay width up to 1/m3 b corrections within and beyond the Standard Model , JHEP 05 (2026) 100 [2512.14635]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    A puzzle in $\bar{B}_{(s)}^0 \to D_{(s)}^{(*)+} \lbrace \pi^-, K^-\rbrace$ decays and extraction of the $f_s/f_d$ fragmentation fraction

    M. Bordone, N. Gubernari, T. Huber, M. Jung and D. van Dyk, A puzzle in ¯B0 (s) → D(∗)+ (s) {π−, K−} decays and extraction of the fs/fd fragmentation fraction, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 951 [2007.10338]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Probing new physics in class-I $B$-meson decays into heavy-light final states

    F.-M. Cai, W.-J. Deng, X.-Q. Li and Y.-D. Yang, Probing new physics in class-I B-meson decays into heavy-light final states , JHEP 10 (2021) 235 [2103.04138]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Towards a Global Analysis of the $b\to c\bar{u} q$ Puzzle

    S. Meiser, D. van Dyk and J. Virto, Towards a global analysis of the b → cuq puzzle, JHEP 06 (2025) 019 [2411.09458]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Collider-Flavour Complementarity from the bottom to the top

    O. Atkinson, C. Englert, M. Kirk and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, Collider-flavour complementarity from the bottom to the top , Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) 258 [2411.00940]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    J.Y. Araz, C. Englert, M. Kirk and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, New insights into the b → c¯uq puzzle through Top-Bottom synergies , 2604.25998. – 42 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Computing Tools for Effective Field Theories

    L. Allwicher et al., Computing tools for effective field theories: SMEFT-Tools 2022 Workshop Report, 14–16th September 2022, Zürich , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 170 [2307.08745]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Low-Energy Effective Field Theory below the Electroweak Scale: Operators and Matching

    E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and P. Stoffer, Low-Energy Effective Field Theory below the Electroweak Scale: Operators and Matching , JHEP 03 (2018) 016 [1709.04486], [Erratum: JHEP 12, 043 (2023)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    B physics Beyond the Standard Model at One Loop: Complete Renormalization Group Evolution below the Electroweak Scale

    J. Aebischer, M. Fael, C. Greub and J. Virto, B physics Beyond the Standard Model at One Loop: Complete Renormalization Group Evolution below the Electroweak Scale , JHEP 09 (2017) 158 [1704.06639]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

    B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [1008.4884]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  46. [46]

    The Standard Model effective field theory at work

    G. Isidori, F. Wilsch and D. Wyler, The standard model effective field theory at work , Rev. Mod. Phys. 96 (2024) 015006 [2303.16922]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    On the two-loop penguin contributions to the Anomalous Dimensions of four-quark operators

    P. Morell and J. Virto, On the two-loop penguin contributions to the Anomalous Dimensions of four-quark operators, JHEP 04 (2024) 105 [2402.00249]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Renormalization-group equations of the LEFT at two loops: dimension-five effects

    L. Naterop and P. Stoffer, Renormalization-group equations of the LEFT at two loops: dimension-five effects, JHEP 06 (2025) 007 [2412.13251]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Two-Loop Anomalous Dimensions in the LEFT: Dimension-Six Four-Fermion Operators in NDR

    J. Aebischer, P. Morell, M. Pesut and J. Virto, Two-loop anomalous dimensions in the LEFT: dimension-six four-fermion operators in NDR , JHEP 05 (2026) 043 [2501.08384]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    Renormalization-group equations of the LEFT at two loops: dimension-six baryon-number-violating operators

    L. Naterop and P. Stoffer, Renormalization-group equations of the LEFT at two loops: dimension-six baryon-number-violating operators, JHEP 07 (2025) 237 [2505.03871]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Naterop and P

    L. Naterop and P. Stoffer, Renormalization-group equations of the LEFT at two loops: dimension-six operators, JHEP 02 (2026) 016 [2507.08926]

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Banik, A

    S. Banik, A. Crivellin, L. Naterop and P. Stoffer, Two-loop anomalous dimensions for baryon-number-violating operators in SMEFT , JHEP 02 (2026) 017 [2510.08682]

    work page arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    L. Born, J. Fuentes-Martín and A.E. Thomsen, Next-to-Leading Order Running in the SMEFT , 2601.19974

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    Low-energy effective field theory below the electroweak scale: matching at one loop

    W. Dekens and P. Stoffer, Low-energy effective field theory below the electroweak scale: matching at one loop, JHEP 10 (2019) 197 [1908.05295], [Erratum: JHEP 11, 148 (2022)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    DsixTools: The Standard Model Effective Field Theory Toolkit

    A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Vicente and J. Virto, DsixTools: The Standard Model Effective Field Theory Toolkit, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 405 [1704.04504]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    DsixTools 2.0: The Effective Field Theory Toolkit

    J. Fuentes-Martin, P. Ruiz-Femenia, A. Vicente and J. Virto, DsixTools 2.0: The Effective Field Theory Toolkit, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 167 [2010.16341]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Wilson: a Python package for the running and matching of Wilson coefficients above and below the electroweak scale

    J. Aebischer, J. Kumar and D.M. Straub, Wilson: a Python package for the running and matching of Wilson coefficients above and below the electroweak scale , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 1026 [1804.05033]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Patterns of Deviation from the Standard Model

    C. Arzt, M.B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, Patterns of deviation from the standard model , Nucl. Phys. B 433 (1995) 41 [hep-ph/9405214]. – 43 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  59. [59]

    Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary

    J. de Blas, J.C. Criado, M. Perez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary , JHEP 03 (2018) 109 [1711.10391]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    QCD corrections for subleading powers in $1/m_b$ for the nonleptonic $b\rightarrow c\bar c s$ transition

    T. Mannel, D. Moreno and A.A. Pivovarov, QCD corrections for subleading powers in 1/mb for the nonleptonic b → c¯cs transition, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 094035 [2503.18775]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Huber, M

    T. Huber, M. Poradziński and J. Virto, Four-body contributions to B → Xsγ at NLO , JHEP 01 (2015) 115 [1411.7677]

    work page arXiv 2015

  62. [62]

    Buras and P.H

    A.J. Buras and P.H. Weisz, QCD Nonleading Corrections to Weak Decays in Dimensional Regularization and ’t Hooft-Veltman Schemes , Nucl. Phys. B 333 (1990) 66

    work page 1990

  63. [63]

    Meiser, P

    S. Meiser, P. Morell, A. Picazo and J. Virto, in preparation,

    work page

  64. [64]

    |Delta F| = 1 Nonleptonic Effective Hamiltonian in a Simpler Scheme

    K.G. Chetyrkin, M. Misiak and M. Munz, |∆F | = 1 nonleptonic effective Hamiltonian in a simpler scheme, Nucl. Phys. B 520 (1998) 279 [hep-ph/9711280]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  65. [65]

    FormTracer - A Mathematica Tracing Package Using FORM

    A.K. Cyrol, M. Mitter and N. Strodthoff, FormTracer - A Mathematica Tracing Package Using FORM , Comput. Phys. Commun. 219 (2017) 346 [1610.09331]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  66. [66]

    Mertig, M

    R. Mertig, M. Bohm and A. Denner, FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64 (1991) 345

    work page 1991

  67. [67]

    New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana, New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0 , Comput. Phys. Commun. 207 (2016) 432 [1601.01167]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana, FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements , Comput. Phys. Commun. 256 (2020) 107478 [2001.04407]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana, FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?, Comput. Phys. Commun. 306 (2025) 109357 [2312.14089]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    HypExp 2, Expanding Hypergeometric Functions about Half-Integer Parameters

    T. Huber and D. Maître, HypExp 2, Expanding hypergeometric functions about half-integer parameters , Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 755 [0708.2443]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  71. [71]

    Four-Particle Phase Space Integrals in Massless QCD

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and G. Heinrich, Four particle phase space integrals in massless QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 682 (2004) 265 [hep-ph/0311276]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  72. [72]

    RunDec: a Mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses

    K.G. Chetyrkin, J.H. Kuhn and M. Steinhauser, RunDec: A Mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses , Comput. Phys. Commun. 133 (2000) 43 [hep-ph/0004189]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  73. [73]

    Version 3 of {\tt RunDec} and {\tt CRunDec}

    F. Herren and M. Steinhauser, Version 3 of RunDec and CRunDec , Comput. Phys. Commun. 224 (2018) 333 [1703.03751]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    Total decay rates of $B$ mesons at NNLO-QCD

    M. Egner, M. Fael, A. Lenz, M.L. Piscopo, A.V. Rusov, K. Schönwald et al., Total decay rates of B mesons at NNLO-QCD , JHEP 04 (2025) 106 [2412.14035]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Cutkosky, Singularities and discontinuities of Feynman amplitudes , J

    R.E. Cutkosky, Singularities and discontinuities of Feynman amplitudes , J. Math. Phys. 1 (1960) 429 . – 44 –

    work page 1960

  76. [76]

    Package-X: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals

    H.H. Patel, Package-X: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals , Comput. Phys. Commun. 197 (2015) 276 [1503.01469]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  77. [77]

    Karlsson, Hypergeometric functions with integral parameter differences , Journal of Mathematical Physics 12 (1971) 270

    P.W. Karlsson, Hypergeometric functions with integral parameter differences , Journal of Mathematical Physics 12 (1971) 270

    work page 1971

  78. [78]

    Tracas and N

    N. Tracas and N. Vlachos, Two Loop Calculations in QCD and the ∆I = 1/2 Rule in Nonleptonic Weak Decays, Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 419

    work page 1982

  79. [79]

    Two-Loop QCD Anomalous Dimensions of Flavour-Changing Four-Quark Operators Within and Beyond the Standard Model

    A.J. Buras, M. Misiak and J. Urban, Two loop QCD anomalous dimensions of flavor changing four quark operators within and beyond the standard model , Nucl. Phys. B 586 (2000) 397 [hep-ph/0005183], [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 1002, 116529 (2024)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  80. [80]

    Dugan and B

    M.J. Dugan and B. Grinstein, On the vanishing of evanescent operators , Phys. Lett. B 256 (1991) 239

    work page 1991

Showing first 80 references.