Spin Textures and Eigenstate Evolution of Isospectrally Patterned Lattices

Peter Schmelcher

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 34 references

Spin Textures and Eigenstate Evolution of Isospectrally Patterned Lattices

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spin peaks map onto quasi-nodes in isospectrally patterned lattices

desk verdict Solid but incremental: exact spin reformulation of IPL Hamiltonian plus new phenomenology on spin textures, limited by narrow parameter regime read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07502 v1 pith:DA2GCS3P submitted 2026-07-08 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gasphysics.optics

Peter Schmelcher This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gasphysics.optics

keywords spineigenstatesisospectrallylatticelatticespatternedacrossband

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that a specific class of engineered lattices called isospectrally patterned lattices (IPLs) can be reinterpreted as a single quantum spin moving through a spatially rotating magnetic field, hopping between sites with a spin-flip at each step. Under this interpretation, the author discovers that localized energy eigenstates develop spin peaks precisely at their quasi-nodes, locations where the wavefunction amplitude is near zero. As one moves through the energy spectrum from band edges toward the band center, both the Fourier content and the spin texture undergo a structural rearrangement: the initially bimodal frequency distribution narrows to sharp peaks, and the spin pattern transitions from smooth backgrounds punctuated by localized peaks to a highly regular staggered configuration at the band center. The total variation of local spin expectation values across the lattice quantifies this rearrangement, showing maximal spin fluctuation at band centers where the staggered pattern is strongest.

What carries the argument

The IPL Hamiltonian is rewritten as a spin-1/2 particle in a rotating magnetic field with spin-flip hopping. The on-site term maps to a magnetic field rotating in the x-z plane with angle determined by the lattice phase parameter phi_m, while the inter-cell coupling maps to a spin-raising operator. Local spin expectation values of sigma_x and sigma_z are computed per cell for each eigenstate, and their total variation across the lattice serves as a diagnostic of spin-texture complexity. The Fourier transform of eigenstate components tracks the spectral rearrangement from bimodal to unimodal distributions.

What would settle it

If experiments implementing the IPL Hamiltonian via ultracold atoms in rotating magnetic fields or double-well superlattices fail to show spin peaks at quasi-nodal positions, or if the predicted structural rearrangement of spin textures across the band is absent, the spin interpretation would lose its physical grounding. Additionally, if higher-order corrections or interactions wash out the quasi-nodal structure, the spin-peak correspondence would not survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central finding is the direct spatial correlation between quasi-nodal positions of eigenstates and the locations of spin peaks: where the wavefunction amplitude is smallest, the local spin expectation value exhibits its largest excursion from the smooth background. This holds for localized states near band edges in both weak and strong coupling regimes, and the complexity of the spin texture increases systematically with the degree of excitation, culminating in a maximally oscillatory staggered spin configuration at the band center.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the specific 2x2 real symmetric tight-binding model with a constant phase gradient captures the essential physics of IPLs, and that proposed experimental implementations using ultracold atoms in rotating magnetic fields or double-well superlattices can faithfully realize the idealized Hamiltonian without decoherence or higher-order effects disrupting the spin textures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the spin interpretation holds experimentally, ultracold atoms in optical lattices with engineered site-dependent potentials could serve as a direct platform for observing the predicted spin textures, with quantum gas microscopes providing single-site-resolved readout of spin expectation values.
The correlation between quasi-nodes and spin peaks suggests a design principle: by controlling the phase gradient of the lattice, one could engineer the positions and density of spin excitations, potentially creating on-demand arrays of localized spin peaks for quantum information applications.
The structural rearrangement transition in the spin texture, quantified by total variation, provides an experimentally accessible signature of the localization-to-delocalization crossover that does not require measuring the full wavefunction.
Extension to two- or three-dimensional IPLs with higher-dimensional degenerate subspaces could yield topologically nontrivial spin textures or new classes of spin-ordering phenomena not present in one dimension.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The spin-peak/quasi-node correspondence may reflect a deeper principle: in systems where a spin degree of freedom is coupled to a spatially varying field, spin excitations localize at amplitude minima because the energy cost of a spin flip is lowest where the wavefunction overlap with the background field is weakest. If so, this mechanism would generalize beyond IPLs to any lattice with a rotating
The narrowing of the Fourier spectrum to near-single-frequency peaks at the band center suggests that band-center eigenstates approximate plane-wave-like states in a dual (frequency) representation, which could make them robust against certain classes of perturbation, though this is not explored in the paper.
The total variation diagnostic could be applied to other locally symmetric or aperiodic lattice systems to detect spectral rearrangements without full state tomography, as a coarse-grained probe of eigenstate structure.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The main thing to know: this paper takes the IPL Hamiltonian introduced in the author's prior work and rewrites it exactly as a spin in a rotating magnetic field with spin-flip hopping. That rewriting is algebraically clean — Eq. 4 to Eq. 5 is just Pauli matrix identities, no approximation. The genuinely new content is the phenomenological analysis built on top of that interpretation: spin textures of eigenstates, the correlation between spin peaks and quasi-nodes, the Fourier spectral evolution across the band, and a total-variation quantifier for spin fluctuations. The spin-peak/quasi-node correlation is real and the scatter plot in Fig. 8 backs it up reasonably. The Fourier analysis (Fig. 3-5) is a useful characterization of how eigenstate structure evolves from band edge to band center. The stronger-coupling case (ε=0.3) in Section V shows the main phenomenology is not fragile to coupling strength, which is good. The experimental proposals in the conclusion (ultracold atoms near a current-carrying wire, double-well superlattices) are sketchy but directionally reasonable. What the paper does well: it is honest about its scope. The conclusion explicitly acknowledges that only the simplest K=2 case is treated and that generalizations to higher dimensions are unexplored. The algebra is correct. The figures are illustrative and internally consistent. The soft spots are real but proportionate. First, the parameter space is narrow: one set of (d1, d2), two coupling values, one phase-grid type, one lattice symmetry, no finite-size scaling. The phenomenology could look different for other parameter choices and we would not know. Second, the spin-peak/quasi-node correlation is perhaps less surprising than the paper implies: the local spin expectation value (Eq. 7) is defined on the normalized cell vector, so at quasi-nodes where eigenvector components are small, the spin direction is weakly constrained by the energy landscape. Spin peaks there are physically expected. The paper does not overclaim depth on this point, but it also does not engage with the mechanism. Third, the paper is almost entirely descriptive. There is no analytical understanding of the Fourier spectral evolution, no scaling theory, no comparison with related models (e.g., Aubry-André or other aperiodic chains). The total variation measure is a reasonable diagnostic but is introduced without much justification for why it is the right quantity. The self-citation pattern is heavy ([22, 24] are both by the same author) but this is the same research program and the cited results are legitimate prior work, not circular. This paper is for researchers working on engineered quantum lattices and localization in aperiodic systems. It provides a useful physical picture and some new phenomenology for the IPL framework, but it does not break new ground beyond that framework. It deserves a serious referee — the algebra is correct, the observations are internally consistent, and the spin interpretation could open productive directions if the phenomenology is shown to be robust across a broader parameter space. I would accept for peer review with the expectation that the referee pushes for at least some robustness checks beyond the two coupling values presented.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper studies isospectrally patterned lattices (IPLs) composed of coupled 2×2 isospectral cells. The author shows that the IPL Hamiltonian can be exactly rewritten as a single spin-1/2 in a spatially rotating magnetic field with spin-flip hopping between cells (Eqs. 4–6). Using this spin interpretation, the paper analyzes the eigenstate structure across the band: (i) localized eigenstates near band edges exhibit quasi-nodal envelopes, (ii) the Fourier spectrum evolves from bimodal distributions at band edges to narrow peaks at the band center, (iii) spin expectation values develop peaks at quasi-node positions, and (iv) the total variation of local spin fluctuations quantifies the rearrangement transition. Two coupling strengths (ε = 0.01, 0.3) and two system sizes (Ns = 302, 1202) are examined.

Significance. The spin-in-rotating-field interpretation (Eq. 5) is an exact algebraic identity that provides a concrete physical embedding for the IPL Hamiltonian, which was previously lacking. This is a genuine contribution: it connects the abstract isospectrality construction to a physical picture (mobile spin in an inhomogeneous field) and suggests experimental routes (ultracold atoms, double-well superlattices). The phenomenological observations—spin peaks at quasi-nodes, Fourier spectral evolution, and the TVS diagnostic—are internally consistent and represent new characterizations of IPL eigenstate structure. The scatter plot in Fig. 8 provides reasonable evidence for the spin-peak/quasi-node correlation. The work builds on the author's prior IPL studies [22, 24] but adds the spin interpretation and texture analysis as new content.

major comments (2)

§IV.B, Eq. (7): The local spin expectation value ⟨σ⟩_m is computed on the normalized cell vector |Ψ_m⟩. At quasi-nodes, both eigenvector components within a cell are small, so normalization amplifies the ratio of two near-zero quantities. This means spin peaks at quasi-nodes are, in a sense, built into the definition: wherever the amplitude is small, the local spin direction is weakly constrained by the energy landscape and can take any value. The paper acknowledges this indirectly ('costs little energy since it happens close to the quasi-node') but does not explicitly discuss how the normalization affects the interpretation of spin peak heights. A brief discussion clarifying whether the peak amplitudes carry physical information beyond the normalization artifact would strengthen the central claim about spin-spatial correlations.
§III–V: All numerical results use a single parameter set (d1=1, d2=2, equidistant phase grid, L=π/4) with only two coupling values and two system sizes. While the paper acknowledges this limitation in §VI, several qualitative claims—particularly the bimodal-to-narrow-peak Fourier evolution (Fig. 5) and the TVS envelope structure (Figs. 7, 10)—would benefit from at least one additional data point (e.g., a different phase range L, or a third system size) to demonstrate that the observed phenomenology is not specific to the chosen parameters. This is load-bearing for the paper's claim that these are generic features of IPLs.

minor comments (7)

§II, Eq. (1): The Hamiltonian is labeled as Eq. (1) in the text but the equation number (1) appears on the cell definition, while the Hamiltonian appears unnumbered between Eqs. (1) and (3). The numbering should be checked.
§II: The transition from Eq. (3) to Eq. (4) uses the identity cos²ϕ = (1+cos2ϕ)/2 etc. Stating this explicitly would help readers verify the algebra.
Figures 1 and 6 use the same eigenstate indices (0,1,19,30,70,75) but this correspondence is only stated in the text, not in the figure captions. Adding a note in the Fig. 6 caption that these match Fig. 1 would aid comparison.
§III.B: The choice of sampling frequency fs=1 and its implications for the frequency binning are mentioned but the physical meaning of 'frequency' in a lattice context could be stated more precisely (it appears to refer to spatial oscillation frequency in units of inverse lattice sites).
Fig. 7 caption: 'Note that the two spin curves have been shifted by a constant value of 30' — this shift should be indicated on the axis or in the figure itself to avoid misreading.
§VI: The proposed experimental implementations (current-carrying wire, double-well superlattices) are described qualitatively. A brief comment on whether the required spatial variation of the rotation angle ϕ_m can be achieved with sufficient precision would be helpful.
References [22, 23, 24] are by the same author. While this is natural for a developing line of work, the paper should ensure that the present results are clearly distinguished from these prior works beyond the statement that the spin interpretation is new.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive reading of our manuscript. The referee correctly identifies the spin-in-rotating-field interpretation as the central new contribution and finds the phenomenological observations internally consistent. The two major comments both raise legitimate points: (1) the role of normalization in amplifying spin expectation values at quasi-nodes, and (2) the limited parameter coverage. We address both below and will incorporate revisions accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: §IV.B, Eq. (7): The local spin expectation value ⟨σ⟩_m is computed on the normalized cell vector |Ψ_m⟩. At quasi-nodes, both eigenvector components within a cell are small, so normalization amplifies the ratio of two near-zero quantities. This means spin peaks at quasi-nodes are, in a sense, built into the definition. A brief discussion clarifying whether the peak amplitudes carry physical information beyond the normalization artifact would strengthen the central claim.

Authors: The referee raises a valid and important point. We agree that the normalization of the cell vector |Ψ_m⟩ at quasi-nodes—where both components are small—means the local spin direction is determined by the ratio of two near-zero amplitudes and is therefore weakly constrained by the local energy landscape. This is a genuine feature of the definition that we did not explicitly discuss. However, we wish to clarify that the central physical claim is not about the absolute peak heights per se, but about the spatial correlation between quasi-node positions and spin peak locations. The scatter plot in Fig. 8 demonstrates this correlation: large spin expectation values occur exclusively at cells with small eigenvector components, while cells with larger amplitudes exhibit spin values confined near zero. This correlation is a non-trivial structural property of the eigenstates—it reflects the fact that the spin texture is free to reorient precisely where the wavefunction amplitude is suppressed, and the resulting patterns (peak spacing, sign alternation, regularity near the band center) carry physical information about the eigenstate's spectral character. That said, we agree that the role of normalization in determining peak amplitudes should be stated explicitly. We will add a discussion paragraph in §IV.B clarifying that the peak heights are amplified by normalization and should not be interpreted as absolute spin magnitudes, while the spin-spatial correlation and the pattern of peak locations remain physically meaningful. revision: yes
Referee: §III–V: All numerical results use a single parameter set (d1=1, d2=2, equidistant phase grid, L=π/4) with only two coupling values and two system sizes. Several qualitative claims would benefit from at least one additional data point to demonstrate that the observed phenomenology is not specific to the chosen parameters.

Authors: This is a fair concern. The manuscript does acknowledge in §VI that only the simplest IPL case is studied, but we agree that adding at least one additional parameter set would strengthen the generality of the qualitative claims, particularly for the bimodal-to-narrow-peak Fourier evolution and the TVS envelope structure. We will supplement the manuscript with results for at least one additional phase range (e.g., L=π/2) and/or a different ratio d1/d2, showing that the qualitative phenomenology—spin peaks at quasi-nodes, the Fourier spectral evolution, and the TVS envelope shape—persists. We note that the spin interpretation (Eqs. 4–6) is an exact algebraic identity that holds for all parameter choices, so the structural relationship between quasi-nodes and spin peaks is parameter-independent by construction. The additional data will serve to confirm that the observed phenomenological patterns are likewise robust. We will include these supplementary results, likely as an additional figure or panel, in the revised manuscript. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the spin interpretation is an exact algebraic identity and the phenomenological results are numerical observations from a defined model.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—the spin-in-rotating-field interpretation of the IPL Hamiltonian—is established by a direct algebraic rewriting. Equation (3) expands the cell matrix $A_m$ for $K=2$; equation (4) rewrites the full Hamiltonian using Pauli matrix identities ($1, σ_x, σ_z$), which is a standard, exact decomposition of any 2×2 real symmetric matrix; equation (5) simply relabels the coefficients as magnetic field components $B_z(m), B_x(m)$. No approximation, no fit, and no self-citation is load-bearing for this step. The spin texture results (spin peaks at quasi-nodes, TVS evolution, Fourier analysis) are numerical observations on the eigenstates of the explicitly defined Hamiltonian with chosen parameters ($d_1=1, d_2=2, ε=0.01$ or $0.3$). No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then 'predicted' on another subset. The self-citations [22, 24] establish the IPL framework and prior localization results, but the new contributions—spin interpretation and spin texture characterization—are derived within this paper from the model's own equations. The local spin expectation values (Eq. 7) are standard quantum mechanical expectation values, not definitions that presuppose the conclusion. The observation that spin peaks occur at quasi-nodes is a numerical finding, not a tautological consequence of the definition. The derivation chain is self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are invented. The spin and magnetic field are interpretations of the existing Hamiltonian structure.

free parameters (4)

d1, d2 = 1, 2
Diagonal elements of the seed block Hamiltonian, chosen to set the energy scale.
epsilon = 0.01, 0.3
Off-diagonal coupling parameter between cells, chosen to explore weak and strong coupling regimes.
L = pi/4
Angular range covered by the lattice, chosen to span a specific phase interval.
N = 151, 601
Number of cells, determining lattice size Ns=302, 1202.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The IPL Hamiltonian accurately models a tight-binding system with isospectral cells.
The entire analysis rests on this model being physically realizable and capturing the essential physics.
domain assumption The 2x2 real symmetric case (K=2) captures the essential phenomenology of IPLs.
The paper restricts analysis to this case, assuming generalizations to higher K will yield similar richness.
domain assumption The proposed experimental setups (ultracold atoms, superlattices) can implement the ideal Hamiltonian.
The experimental realization is asserted but not demonstrated.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin Textures and Eigenstate Evolution of Isospectrally Patterned Lattices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DA2GCS3P

@misc{pith2026260707502,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin Textures and Eigenstate Evolution of Isospectrally Patterned Lattices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DA2GCS3P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07502}
}

read the original abstract

Isospectrally patterned lattices exhibit a composite band structure with a tunable ratio of localized versus delocalized eigenstates that is controlled by the underlying phase gradient. We show that the lattice Hamiltonian can be interpreted as that of a single spin exposed to a rotating magnetic field which is allowed to hop with a spin-flip across the lattice. In the low- and high-energy part of the band the localized states show an envelope of oscillatory character separated by quasi-nodes. Spin peaks occur at the locations of these quasi-nodes and provide a unique spin texture to the eigenstates which becomes increasingly complex with increasing degree of excitation. The crossover from localization to delocalization and vice versa leaves its fingerprints in the Fourier spectrum of the eigenstates: the original bimodal frequency distribution widens with increasing degree of excitation, moves across the spectral window and finally culminates in an extremely narrow frequency peak. In the course of this evolution the spin texture undergoes a rearrangement transition involving different characteristic (ir)regular patterns which we quantify by considering the total variation of the local spin fluctuations. Our results demonstrate the variety of the spectral properties of isospectrally patterned lattices which holds great prospect in particular when considering higher lattice or cell dimensions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07502 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Individual eigenstates of the IPL for d1 = 1, d2 = 2, ϵ = 0.01, Ns = 302 with open boundary conditions, placed symmetrically around π 4 . ϵ is the off-diagonal coupling, Ns is the dimension of the Hamiltonian. The subfigures (a-f) correspond to the 0, 1, 19, 30, 70, 75-th eigenstate in the first band, respectively. (a-c) are low energy localized states and (d-f) are from the delocalized states sandwiched between loc… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Absolute values of the amplitudes in frequency space for the individual 6, 70, 130, 213, 302, 416, 480, 550, 600-th eigenstate corresponding to subfigures (a-i) for an equidistant ϕ lattice for d1 = 1, d2 = 2, ϵ = 0.01, Ns = 1202 with open boundary conditions, placed symmetrically around π 4 . ϵ is the off-diagonal coupling, Ns is the dimension of the Hamiltonian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Windows of the frequency distribution (Fourier [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (6 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Analysis of the Fourier spectrum of the com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Local spin structure ie. local expectation values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Total variation of the local spin expectation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Spin space scatter plot of the 12-th eigenstate of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Local spin structure ie. local expectation values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Total variation of the local spin expectation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[1]

Thompson, Angular Momentum: An Illustrated Guide to Rotational Symmetries for Physical Systems, Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 1994

W.J. Thompson, Angular Momentum: An Illustrated Guide to Rotational Symmetries for Physical Systems, Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 1994

work page 1994
[2]

Hamermesh, Group Theory and Its Applications to Physical Problems, Dover Books on Physics and Chem- istry, 1989

M. Hamermesh, Group Theory and Its Applications to Physical Problems, Dover Books on Physics and Chem- istry, 1989

work page 1989
[3]

K¨ oppel, W

H. K¨ oppel, W. Domcke, and L. S. Cederbaum, Adv.Chem.Phys. 57, 59 (1984)

work page 1984
[4]

Baer, Beyond Born-Oppenheimer: Electronic Nonadi- abatic Coupling Terms and Conical Intersections, Wiley, New York, 2006

M. Baer, Beyond Born-Oppenheimer: Electronic Nonadi- abatic Coupling Terms and Conical Intersections, Wiley, New York, 2006

work page 2006
[5]

Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, Dover Publications Inc

M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, Dover Publications Inc. 2004

work page 2004
[6]

Pethick and H

C.J. Pethick and H. Smith, Bose-Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press 2011

work page 2011
[7]

Leykam, A

D. Leykam, A. Andreanov and S. Flach, Artificial flat band systems: from lattice models to experiments, Adv.Phys. 3, 1473052 (2018)

work page 2018
[8]

Aoki, Flat bands in condensed-matter systems - perspective for magnetism and superconductivity, Cont.Phys., 66, 1 (2025)

H. Aoki, Flat bands in condensed-matter systems - perspective for magnetism and superconductivity, Cont.Phys., 66, 1 (2025)

work page 2025

Show all 34 references

[9]

Okuma and T

N. Okuma and T. Mizoguchi,Relationship between two-particle topology and fractional Chern insulator, Phys.Rev.Research 5, 013112 (2023)

2023
[10]

Kalozoumis, C

P.A. Kalozoumis, C. Morfonios, F.K. Diakonos and P. Schmelcher, Invariants of broken discrete symmetries, Phys.Rev.Lett. 113, 050403 (2014)

2014
[11]

Kalozoumis, C

P.A. Kalozoumis, C. Morfonios, F.K. Diakonos and P. Schmelcher, Local symmetries in one-dimensional quan- tum scattering, Phys.Rev.A 87, 032113 (2013)

2013
[12]

Kalozoumis, C

P.A. Kalozoumis, C. Morfonios, N. Palaiodimopoulos, F.K. Diakonos and P. Schmelcher, Local symmetries and perfect transmission in aperiodic photonic multilayers, Phys.Rev.A 88, 033857 (2013)

2013
[13]

Morfonios, P.A

C. Morfonios, P.A. Kalozoumis, F.K. Diakonos and P. Schmelcher, Nonlocal discrete continuity and invariant currents in locally symmetric effective Schr¨ odinger ar- rays, Ann.Phys. 385, 623 (2017)

2017
[14]

Morfonios, M

C.V. Morfonios, M. R¨ ontgen, F.K. Diakonos and P. Schmelcher, Transfer efficiency enhancement and eigen- state properties in locally symmetric disordered finite chains, Ann.Phys. 418, 168163 (2020)

2020
[15]

Kalozoumis, O

P.A. Kalozoumis, O. Richoux, F. K. Diakonos, G. Theocharis, and P. Schmelcher, Invariant currents in lossy acoustic waveguides with complete local symmetry, Phys.Rev.B 92, 014303 (2015)

2015
[16]

Schmitt, S

N. Schmitt, S. Weimann, C.V. Morfonios, M. R¨ ontgen, M. Heinrich, P. Schmelcher and A. Szameit, Observation of Local Symmetry in Photonic Systems, Las.Phot.Rev. 14, 1900222 (2020)

2020
[17]

R¨ ontgen, C.V

M. R¨ ontgen, C.V. Morfonios, R. Wang, L. Dal Negro and P. Schmelcher, Local symmetry theory of resonator struc- tures for the real-space control of edge states in binary aperiodic chains, Phys.Rev. B 99, 214201 (2019)

2019
[18]

Schmelcher, Degenerate subspace localization and lo- cal symmetries, Phys.Rev.Res

P. Schmelcher, Degenerate subspace localization and lo- cal symmetries, Phys.Rev.Res. 6, 023188 (2024)

2024
[19]

Maci´ a Barber, Aperiodic Structures in Condensed Matter, Fundamentals and Applications, Series in Con- densed Matter Physics, CRC Press 2009

E. Maci´ a Barber, Aperiodic Structures in Condensed Matter, Fundamentals and Applications, Series in Con- densed Matter Physics, CRC Press 2009

2009
[20]

Maci´ a-Barber, Quasicrystals, Fundamentals and Ap- plications, CRC Press 2021

E. Maci´ a-Barber, Quasicrystals, Fundamentals and Ap- plications, CRC Press 2021

2021
[21]

Lee and T

P.A. Lee and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Disordered electronic systems, Rev.Mod.Phys. 57, 287 (1985)

1985
[22]

Schmelcher, Isospectrally patterned lattices, Sci- ent.Rep

P. Schmelcher, Isospectrally patterned lattices, Sci- ent.Rep. 15, 27686 (2025)

2025
[23]

Diakonos and P

F.K. Diakonos and P. Schmelcher, Continuum model of isospectrally patterned lattices, J.Phys. A 59, 075303 (2026)

2026
[24]

Schmelcher, Computational study of the spectral behaviour of different isospectrally patterned lattices, Phys.Lett

P. Schmelcher, Computational study of the spectral behaviour of different isospectrally patterned lattices, Phys.Lett. A 571, 131310 (2026). 13

2026
[25]

Bloch, J

I. Bloch, J. Dalibard and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev.Mod.Phys. 80, 885 (2008)

2008
[26]

Tarruell and L

L. Tarruell and L. Sanchez-Palencia, Quantum simula- tion of the Hubbard model with ultracold fermions in optical lattices, C.R. Physique 19, 365 (2018)

2018
[27]

W.S. Bakr, Z. Ba, M.L. Prichard, Microscopy of Ul- tracold Fermions in Optical Lattices, arXiv:2507.04042 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[28]

Esslinger, Fermi-Hubbard Physics with Atoms in an Optical Lattice, Ann.Rev.Cond.Matt

T. Esslinger, Fermi-Hubbard Physics with Atoms in an Optical Lattice, Ann.Rev.Cond.Matt. 1, 129 (2010)

2010
[29]

Lewenstein, A

M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera and V. Ahufinger, Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices: Simulating Quantum Many- Body Systems, Oxford University Press 2017

2017
[30]

Bakr, J.I

W.S. Bakr, J.I. Gillen, A. Peng, S. F¨ olling and M. Greiner, A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice, Nature 462, 74 (2009)

2009
[31]

Sherson, C

J.F. Sherson, C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, M. Cheneau, I. Bloch, and S. Kuhr, Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic Mott insulator, Nature 467, 68 (2010)

2010
[32]

S. Buob, J. H¨ oschele, V. Makhalov, A. Rubio-Abadal and L. Tarruell, A Strontium Quantum-Gas Microscope, Phys.Rev.X Quantum 5, 020316 (2024)

2024
[33]

A.M. Rey, V. Gritsev, I. Bloch, E. Demler and M.D. Lukin, Preparation and Detection of Magnetic Quan- tum Phases in Optical Superlattices, Phys.Rev.Lett. 99, 140601 (2007)

2007
[34]

Gao, S.-J

X. Gao, S.-J. Li, S.-L. Chen, X.-T. Fang, Q.-R. Zhu, X. Deng, L. Cao, P. Schmelcher and Z.-K. Hu, Interac- tion effects of pseudospin-based magnetic monopoles and kinks in a doped dipolar superlattice gas, Phys.Rev.A 105, 053308 (2022)

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Thompson, Angular Momentum: An Illustrated Guide to Rotational Symmetries for Physical Systems, Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 1994

W.J. Thompson, Angular Momentum: An Illustrated Guide to Rotational Symmetries for Physical Systems, Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 1994

work page 1994

[2] [2]

Hamermesh, Group Theory and Its Applications to Physical Problems, Dover Books on Physics and Chem- istry, 1989

M. Hamermesh, Group Theory and Its Applications to Physical Problems, Dover Books on Physics and Chem- istry, 1989

work page 1989

[3] [3]

K¨ oppel, W

H. K¨ oppel, W. Domcke, and L. S. Cederbaum, Adv.Chem.Phys. 57, 59 (1984)

work page 1984

[4] [4]

Baer, Beyond Born-Oppenheimer: Electronic Nonadi- abatic Coupling Terms and Conical Intersections, Wiley, New York, 2006

M. Baer, Beyond Born-Oppenheimer: Electronic Nonadi- abatic Coupling Terms and Conical Intersections, Wiley, New York, 2006

work page 2006

[5] [5]

Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, Dover Publications Inc

M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, Dover Publications Inc. 2004

work page 2004

[6] [6]

Pethick and H

C.J. Pethick and H. Smith, Bose-Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press 2011

work page 2011

[7] [7]

Leykam, A

D. Leykam, A. Andreanov and S. Flach, Artificial flat band systems: from lattice models to experiments, Adv.Phys. 3, 1473052 (2018)

work page 2018

[8] [8]

Aoki, Flat bands in condensed-matter systems - perspective for magnetism and superconductivity, Cont.Phys., 66, 1 (2025)

H. Aoki, Flat bands in condensed-matter systems - perspective for magnetism and superconductivity, Cont.Phys., 66, 1 (2025)

work page 2025