Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 55 references

Directed assembly of tetrahedral patchy particles

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tuning two DNA bond types on tetrapod particles steers them into diamond, hexagonal diamond, triple lattices, and visible-color clathrate crystals.

desk verdict Clean experimental phase diagram that turns competing staggered/eclipsed bonds into a practical control knob for open colloidal lattices, including the first pure sII clathrate and triple-diamond networks at optical length scales. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07877 v1 pith:OZ5KGZBM submitted 2026-07-08 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Xin Yin , Ekaterina Kostyurina , Bert Nickel , Tim Liedl , Gregor Posnjak This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords DNAorigamitetrahedralpatchyparticlesdiamondcubichexagonalsIIclathratestructuralcolorcompetingbondscolloidalself-assembly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Tetrahedral colloidal particles have long been proposed as building blocks for open lattices such as diamond, but competing staggered and eclipsed bonds usually produce mixed or disordered phases. This paper shows that DNA-origami tetrapods can be given two deliberately competing attachment modes—one sequence-specific staggered bond and one poly-G/poly-C eclipsed bond—whose relative strengths are set by sequence design and magnesium concentration. By dialing that ratio the same monomers assemble pure diamond cubic, twinned diamond, stacking-disordered diamond, hexagonal diamond, triple-interpenetrating diamond networks, and pure sII clathrate crystals. The clathrate unit cell is 440 nm on edge, large enough that its Bragg reflections fall in the visible and produce structural color. The result is a single, programmable colloidal system that maps a large slice of the theoretically predicted phase diagram of tetrahedral patchy particles and yields open photonic crystals without guest molecules or polychromatic coding.

What carries the argument

Competing torsional DNA bonds on the tetrapod arms: six sequence-specific contacts that favor a 60° staggered geometry versus twelve poly-G/poly-C contacts that favor a 0° eclipsed geometry. Their relative hybridization free energies set the statistical preference for each local configuration and thereby select the global lattice.

What would settle it

A SAXS or SEM series in which the poly-G length is shortened or removed while the sequence-specific contacts are held fixed: if the phase sequence (DC → twinning → HD → clathrate) collapses or random aggregates appear, the dual-mode control mechanism fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By systematically varying only the relative strength of two designed DNA binding configurations (staggered sequence-specific versus eclipsed poly-G/poly-C) and the magnesium concentration, a single pair of tetrahedral DNA-origami monomers can be directed into pure diamond cubic, twinned diamond, stacking-disordered mixtures, hexagonal diamond, triple-interpenetrating diamond lattices, and pure sII clathrate crystals whose 440 nm unit cell produces visible structural color.

Load-bearing premise

That the poly-G/poly-C contacts remain weak, transient helpers that do not form G-quadruplexes or same-monomer eclipsed bonds strong enough to erase the intended torsional bias.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a DNA-origami system of two tetrahedral tetrapod monomers whose arm-end sticky ends can form either staggered (A1–B1 sequence-specific) or eclipsed (poly-G/poly-C) bonds. By systematically varying the relative strength of these two modes (via sticky-end sequence design) and MgCl2 concentration, the authors map a phase diagram that includes pure diamond cubic (DC), twinned DC, stacking-disordered DC/HD mixtures, hexagonal diamond (HD), triple-interpenetrating DC and HD lattices, and pure sII clathrate crystals. Structures are identified by SEM morphology and surface lattice imaging, corroborated by SAXS peak indexing and quantitative phase-fraction fits. The sII clathrate unit cell (~440 nm) produces visible structural color. The work extends prior pure-DC origami assemblies by deliberately allowing competing torsional states.

Significance. If the structural assignments hold, this is a substantial experimental advance for colloidal self-assembly of open lattices. It realizes, with a single pair of tetrahedral monomers, a large fraction of the theoretically predicted tetrahedral-patchy phase diagram (DC, HD, stacking disorder, sII clathrate) that has been difficult to access experimentally, and additionally reports triple-interpenetrating diamond networks and visible structural color from a rationally designed 440 nm clathrate cell. The approach of tunable competing torsional bonds is more general than polychromatic-patch schemes and closely mimics atomic/molecular analogues. Strengths include dense experimental sampling across sequence variants and salt, complementary SEM/SAXS identification, and quantitative phase-fraction analysis. These results are of clear interest for soft-matter physics and photonic materials.

major comments (2)
  1. The claim of 'pure' hexagonal diamond (main text around Fig. 2G–I and phase diagram Fig. 5) is qualified in the text itself: pure HD single crystals always coexist with stacking-disordered and/or clathrate crystals, and only 'few isolated staggered layers' are identified by SEM. SAXS phase fractions (Figs. S29–S32) and the supplementary text further indicate that HD is rarely the sole phase. The abstract and phase-diagram language should be tightened to 'high-purity HD domains / single crystals coexisting with other phases' so that the central claim remains accurate.
  2. Triple-lattice assignment (Fig. 4, S24–S27) rests primarily on denser surface patterns in SEM and morphology changes; the supplementary text notes that triple HD SAXS closely resembles DC/triple DC because characteristic HD peaks are partially cancelled, making SAXS-only distinction difficult. A clearer statement of which samples have side-view SEM confirmation of bulk triple structure (vs. surface densification) and any additional controls would strengthen this novel claim, which is load-bearing for the high-Mg region of the phase diagram.
minor comments (4)
  1. Figure 5 / S28 phase diagram: the configuration-bias axis is qualitative (sequence names). Adding the calculated hybridization free energies from Table S3 as a secondary scale or annotation would make the ranking more quantitative for readers.
  2. The poly-G/poly-C secondary contacts (and possible G-quadruplexes or same-monomer eclipsed bonds) are hypothesized in the clathrate discussion and Fig. S3. A short explicit statement in the main text that these contacts act as a subordinate, tunable bias rather than a scrambling force would help readers evaluate the weakest assumption.
  3. Structural color (Fig. 3G,H) is shown only for silicified crystals in air. A brief note on whether color is observed in solution or before silicification would clarify the photonic claim.
  4. Minor presentation: consistent notation for Mg2+ vs MgCl2 concentrations; ensure all SAXS peak indices in Fig. 2M and S14/S27 match the models in Fig. S33; fix occasional typographical inconsistencies (e.g., Ice Ih, 6^4 5^12).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: experimental phase map of DNA-origami tetrapods, not a derivation that folds onto its inputs.

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental crystallization study. Relative strengths of two designed DNA binding modes (sequence-specific staggered A1–B1 versus non-specific eclipsed poly-G/poly-C) plus Mg2+ concentration are varied; the resulting lattices (pure DC, twinned DC, stacking-disordered DC/HD, HD, triple-interpenetrating DC/HD, sII clathrate) are identified independently by SEM morphology and SAXS peak indexing/phase-fraction fits. Hybridization free energies (Table S3) are calculated once and used only as a qualitative ranking of configuration bias; lattice constants (e.g., 440 nm clathrate unit cell) are measured, not fitted to produce the structures. Self-citation of the authors’ prior pure-DC work (ref. 43) supplies background design and a single-monomer control, but is not load-bearing for the multi-phase diagram or the claim that competing torsional bonds direct assembly. No equation equates a “prediction” to a fitted input by construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported, and no ansatz is smuggled via citation. The derivation chain is therefore observational and self-contained against external structural benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard DNA-origami folding and hybridization thermodynamics plus the experimental observation that two competing contact geometries can be biased by sequence length and Mg2+. No new physical entities are postulated; free parameters are the discrete sequence variants and the continuous Mg2+ concentration that define the experimental axes.

free parameters (3)
  • specific-binding-region length (4–6 nt) and poly-G length (2–3 G)
    Discrete design choices that set the relative free energy of staggered versus eclipsed contacts; not fitted post-hoc but chosen to span the phase diagram.
  • MgCl2 concentration (18–70 mM)
    Continuous experimental axis that modulates electrostatics and relative bond strengths; values are set by the experimenter, not derived.
  • hybridization free energies of binding extensions
    Calculated once (Table S3) and used only as a qualitative ranking of staggered versus eclipsed preference; not refitted to the observed phases.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption DNA hybridization free energies calculated by standard nearest-neighbor models correctly rank the relative strengths of the designed contacts under the experimental buffer conditions.
    Used to justify the ordering of sequence variants along the ‘configuration bias’ axis of the phase diagram.
  • domain assumption Silicification preserves the as-grown lattice geometry sufficiently for SEM and SAXS identification.
    All structural assignments after crystallization rely on silicified samples.
  • ad hoc to paper The designed three-fold arrangement of sticky ends on each tetrapod arm produces only the two intended torsional states (0° eclipsed or 60° staggered).
    Core design premise; deviations (G-quadruplexes, same-monomer eclipsed bonds) are acknowledged as possible but not quantified.
invented entities (1)
  • triple cubic / triple hexagonal diamond networks independent evidence
    purpose: Describe the experimentally observed interpenetrating lattices that appear at high Mg2+.
    New structural motif not previously reported for DNA-origami or colloidal diamond; identified by SEM surface patterns and SAXS intensity changes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Directed assembly of tetrahedral patchy particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OZ5KGZBM

@misc{pith2026260707877,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Directed assembly of tetrahedral patchy particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OZ5KGZBM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07877}
}
read the original abstract

Colloidal particles with prescribed valency such as the tetrahedral patchy particles have long been seen as a viable route to technologically relevant open lattice structures on the scale of hundreds of nanometers. However, conceptual limitations and resulting competing local bonding configurations often lead to mixed lattice phases. Here, we present a DNA-origami enabled approach to controlling the attachment of tetrapod building blocks in predictable ways. By varying the relative strength of two designed binding configurations we are able to direct the assembly of tetrapod particles into diamond cubic, twinned diamonds, stacking-disordered mixtures, hexagonal diamonds, and sII clathrates. Under specific conditions, the diamond structures are interpenetrated by additional networks, resulting in triple cubic and triple hexagonal diamond structures. The 440 nm large unit cell of the clathrates shifts structural reflections into the visible range, giving these rationally designed, self-assembled crystals structural color.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. J. Macfarlane,et al., Nanoparticle Superlattice Engineering with DNA.Science 334(6053), 204–208 (2011), doi:10.1126/science.1210493,https://www.science.org/ doi/10.1126/science.1210493

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1210493 2011

  2. [2]

    Zhang,et al., A general approach to DNA-programmable atom equivalents.Nature Materi- als12(8), 741–746 (2013), doi:10.1038/nmat3647,https://www.nature.com/articles/ nmat3647

    C. Zhang,et al., A general approach to DNA-programmable atom equivalents.Nature Materi- als12(8), 741–746 (2013), doi:10.1038/nmat3647,https://www.nature.com/articles/ nmat3647

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat3647 2013

  3. [3]

    J. D. Joannopoulos, P. R. Villeneuve, S. Fan, Photonic crystals: putting a new twist on light. Nature386(6621), 143–149 (1997), doi:10.1038/386143a0,https://www.nature.com/ articles/386143a0

    work page doi:10.1038/386143a0 1997

  4. [4]

    Hueckel, G

    T. Hueckel, G. M. Hocky, J. Palacci, S. Sacanna, Ionic solids from common colloids.Nature 580(7804), 487–490 (2020), number: 7804, doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2205-0,https://www. nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2205-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2205-0 2020

  5. [5]

    M. R. Jones, N. C. Seeman, C. A. Mirkin, Programmable materials and the nature of the DNA bond.Science347(6224), 1260901 (2015), doi:10.1126/science.1260901,https:// www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1260901

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1260901 2015

  6. [6]

    W. Zhou,et al., Space-tiled colloidal crystals from DNA-forced shape-complementary poly- hedra pairing.Science383(6680), 312–319 (2024), doi:10.1126/science.adj1021,https: //www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adj1021

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adj1021 2024

  7. [7]

    Lin,et al., Clathrate colloidal crystals.Science355(6328), 931–935 (2017), doi:10.1126/ science.aal3919,https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aal3919

    H. Lin,et al., Clathrate colloidal crystals.Science355(6328), 931–935 (2017), doi:10.1126/ science.aal3919,https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aal3919. 16

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aal3919 2017

  8. [8]

    Zhou,et al., Colloidal quasicrystals engineered with DNA.Nature Materials23(3), 424– 428 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41563-023-01706-x,https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41563-023-01706-x

    W. Zhou,et al., Colloidal quasicrystals engineered with DNA.Nature Materials23(3), 424– 428 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41563-023-01706-x,https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41563-023-01706-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-023-01706-x 2024

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Zhang, A. S. Keys, T. Chen, S. C. Glotzer, Self-Assembly of Patchy Particles into Diamond Structures through Molecular Mimicry.Langmuir21(25), 11547–11551 (2005), doi:10.1021/ la0513611,https://doi.org/10.1021/la0513611

    2005 doi

  2. [10]

    D. R. Nelson, Toward a Tetravalent Chemistry of Colloids.Nano Letters2(10), 1125–1129 (2002), doi:10.1021/nl0202096,https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0202096

    2002 doi

  3. [11]

    Romano, E

    F. Romano, E. Sanz, F. Sciortino, Phase diagram of a tetrahedral patchy particle model for different interaction ranges.The Journal of Chemical Physics132(18), 184501 (2010), doi: 10.1063/1.3393777,https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3393777

    2010 doi

  4. [12]

    Romano, E

    F. Romano, E. Sanz, F. Sciortino, Crystallization of tetrahedral patchy particles in silico. The Journal of Chemical Physics134(17), 174502 (2011), doi:10.1063/1.3578182,https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.3578182

    2011 doi

  5. [13]

    Baran, D

    L. Baran, D. Tarasewicz, W. R˙ zysko, Interplay between the Formation of Colloidal Clathrate and Cubic Diamond Crystals.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B128(23), 5792–5801 (2024), doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c02456,https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c02456

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Tarasewicz, E

    D. Tarasewicz, E. Raczy l lo, W. R˙ zysko, L. Baran, Self-assembly of chromatic patchy particles with tetrahedrally arranged patches.Soft Matter21, 1203–1211 (2025), doi: 10.1039/D4SM01210K,https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ sm/d4sm01210k

    2025 doi

  7. [15]

    E. G. Noya, I. Zubieta, D. J. Pine, F. Sciortino, Assembly of clathrates from tetrahedral patchy colloids with narrow patches.The Journal of Chemical Physics151(9), 094502 (2019), doi: 10.1063/1.5109382,https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5109382

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    Frondel, U

    C. Frondel, U. B. Marvin, Lonsdaleite, a Hexagonal Polymorph of Diamond.Nature214(5088), 587–589 (1967), doi:10.1038/214587a0,https://www.nature.com/articles/214587a0. 17

    1967 doi

  9. [17]

    Huang,et al., Tracking cubic ice at molecular resolution.Nature617(7959), 86–91 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05864-5,https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41586-023-05864-5

    X. Huang,et al., Tracking cubic ice at molecular resolution.Nature617(7959), 86–91 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05864-5,https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41586-023-05864-5

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Tong,et al., Structural transition and migration of incoherent twin boundary in diamond

    K. Tong,et al., Structural transition and migration of incoherent twin boundary in diamond. Nature626(7997), 79–85 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06908-6,https://www.nature. com/articles/s41586-023-06908-6

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    P. Ying,et al., Enhancing the hardness of diamond through twin refinement and interlocked twins.Nature Synthesis4(3), 391–398 (2025), doi:10.1038/s44160-024-00707-1,https: //www.nature.com/articles/s44160-024-00707-1

    2025 doi

  12. [20]

    Yang,et al., Synthesis of bulk hexagonal diamond.Nature644(8076), 370– 375 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09343-x,https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41586-025-09343-x

    L. Yang,et al., Synthesis of bulk hexagonal diamond.Nature644(8076), 370– 375 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09343-x,https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41586-025-09343-x

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    Lai,et al., Bulk hexagonal diamond.Nature651(8106), 621–625 (2026), doi:10.1038/ s41586-026-10212-4,https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10212-4

    S. Lai,et al., Bulk hexagonal diamond.Nature651(8106), 621–625 (2026), doi:10.1038/ s41586-026-10212-4,https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10212-4

    2026

  14. [22]

    Y.-H. Lee,et al., Multiple freezing–melting pathways of high-density ice through ice XXI phase at room temperature.Nature Materials25(2), 302–309 (2026), doi:10.1038/ s41563-025-02364-x,https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-025-02364-x

    2026

  15. [23]

    K. Komatsu,et al., Ice Ic without stacking disorder by evacuating hydrogen from hydro- gen hydrate.Nature Communications11(1), 464 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14346-5, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-14346-5

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    Falenty, T

    A. Falenty, T. C. Hansen, W. F. Kuhs, Formation and properties of ice XVI obtained by emptying a type sII clathrate hydrate.Nature516(7530), 231–233 (2014), doi:10.1038/nature14014, https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14014

    2014 doi

  17. [25]

    Lu,et al., Complex gas hydrate from the Cascadia margin.Nature445(7125), 303–306 (2007), doi:10.1038/nature05463,https://www.nature.com/articles/nature05463

    H. Lu,et al., Complex gas hydrate from the Cascadia margin.Nature445(7125), 303–306 (2007), doi:10.1038/nature05463,https://www.nature.com/articles/nature05463. 18

    2007 doi

  18. [26]

    Hassanpouryouzband,et al., Gas hydrates in sustainable chemistry.Chemical Society Re- views49(15), 5225–5309 (2020), doi:10.1039/c8cs00989a,https://doi.org/10.1039/ c8cs00989a

    A. Hassanpouryouzband,et al., Gas hydrates in sustainable chemistry.Chemical Society Re- views49(15), 5225–5309 (2020), doi:10.1039/c8cs00989a,https://doi.org/10.1039/ c8cs00989a

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    J. Gryko,et al., Low-density framework form of crystalline silicon with a wide optical band gap.Physical Review B62(12), R7707–R7710 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.62.R7707, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.62.R7707

    2000 doi

  20. [28]

    A. M. Guloy,et al., A guest-free germanium clathrate.Nature443(7109), 320–323 (2006), doi:10.1038/nature05145,https://www.nature.com/articles/nature05145

    2006 doi

  21. [29]

    Romano, F

    F. Romano, F. Sciortino, Patterning symmetry in the rational design of colloidal crystals.Nature Communications3(1), 975 (2012), doi:10.1038/ncomms1968,https://www.nature.com/ articles/ncomms1968

    2012 doi

  22. [30]

    Rovigatti,et al., A simple solution to the problem of self-assembling cubic diamond crystals

    L. Rovigatti,et al., A simple solution to the problem of self-assembling cubic diamond crystals. Nanoscale14(38), 14268–14275 (2022), doi:10.1039/D2NR03533B,https://pubs.rsc. org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/nr/d2nr03533b

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    Wang,et al., Colloids with valence and specific directional bonding.Na- ture491(7422), 51–55 (2012), doi:10.1038/nature11564,https://www.nature.com/ articles/nature11564

    Y. Wang,et al., Colloids with valence and specific directional bonding.Na- ture491(7422), 51–55 (2012), doi:10.1038/nature11564,https://www.nature.com/ articles/nature11564

    2012 doi

  24. [32]

    Kim,et al., Patchy nanoparticles by atomic stencilling.Nature646(8085), 592– 600 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09605-8,https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41586-025-09605-8

    A. Kim,et al., Patchy nanoparticles by atomic stencilling.Nature646(8085), 592– 600 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09605-8,https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41586-025-09605-8

    2025 doi

  25. [33]

    Zhang,et al., 3D DNA origami crystals.Advanced Materials30(28), 1800273 (2018)

    T. Zhang,et al., 3D DNA origami crystals.Advanced Materials30(28), 1800273 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Y. Tian,et al., Ordered three-dimensional nanomaterials using DNA-prescribed and valence-controlled material voxels.Nature Materials19(7), 789–796 (2020), doi:10.1038/ s41563-019-0550-x,https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-019-0550-x

    2020

  27. [35]

    Wang,et al., DNA origami single crystals with Wulff shapes.Nature Communications 12(1), 3011 (2021), number: 1, doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23332-4,https://www.nature

    Y. Wang,et al., DNA origami single crystals with Wulff shapes.Nature Communications 12(1), 3011 (2021), number: 1, doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23332-4,https://www.nature. com/articles/s41467-021-23332-4. 19

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    Y. Wang, X. Yan, Z. Zhou, N. Ma, Y. Tian, pH-Induced Symmetry Conver- sion of DNA Origami Lattices.Angewandte Chemie International Edition61(40), e202208290 (2022), eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/anie.202208290, doi:10.1002/anie.202208290,https://onlin...

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    Michelson,et al., Three-dimensional visualization of nanoparticle lattices and multimaterial frameworks.Science376(6589), 203–207 (2022)

    A. Michelson,et al., Three-dimensional visualization of nanoparticle lattices and multimaterial frameworks.Science376(6589), 203–207 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    L. Dai,et al., Programming the morphology of DNA origami crystals by mag- nesium ion strength.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120(28), e2302142120 (2023), doi:10.1073/pnas.2302142120,https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/ 10.1073/pnas.2302142120

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    J. S. Kahn,et al., Encoding hierarchical 3D architecture through inverse design of programmable bonds.Nature Materials24(8), 1273–1282 (2025), doi:10.1038/ s41563-025-02263-1,https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-025-02263-1

    2025

  32. [40]

    J. Russo,et al., SAT-assembly: a new approach for designing self-assembling systems.Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter34(35), 354002 (2022), doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ac5479, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ac5479

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    H. Liu,et al., Inverse design of a pyrochlore lattice of DNA origami through model-driven experiments.Science384(6697), 776–781 (2024), doi:10.1126/science.adl5549,https:// www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.adl5549

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    He,et al., Colloidal diamond.Nature585(7826), 524–529 (2020), doi:10.1038/ s41586-020-2718-6,https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2718-6

    M. He,et al., Colloidal diamond.Nature585(7826), 524–529 (2020), doi:10.1038/ s41586-020-2718-6,https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2718-6

    2020

  35. [43]

    G. Posnjak,et al., Diamond-lattice photonic crystals assembled from DNA origami.Science 384(6697), 781–785 (2024), doi:10.1126/science.adl2733,https://www.science.org/ doi/10.1126/science.adl2733

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    Ij ¨as, T

    H. Ij ¨as, T. Liedl, V. Linko, G. Posnjak, A label-free light-scattering method to resolve assembly and disassembly of DNA nanostructures.Biophysical Journal121(24), 4800–4809 (2022), doi: 20 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.10.036,https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0006349...

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    Nguyen, M

    L. Nguyen, M. D ¨oblinger, T. Liedl, A. Heuer-Jungemann, DNA-Origami-Templated Sil- ica Growth by Sol–Gel Chemistry.Angewandte Chemie International Edition58(3), 912– 916 (2019), doi:10.1002/anie.201811323,https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ abs/10.1002/anie.201811323

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    C. G. Salzmann, B. J. Murray, J. J. Shephard, Extent of stacking disorder in diamond.Diamond and Related Materials59, 69–72 (2015), doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2015.09.007,https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925963515300388

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    A. Ermatov,et al., Fabrication of Functional 3D Nanoarchitectures via Atomic Layer Deposition on DNA Origami Crystals.Journal of the American Chemical Society147(11), 9519–9527 (2025), doi:10.1021/jacs.4c17232,https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c17232

    2025 doi

  40. [48]

    Dietz, S

    H. Dietz, S. M. Douglas, W. M. Shih, Folding DNA into Twisted and Curved Nanoscale Shapes.Science325(5941), 725–730 (2009), doi:10.1126/science.1174251,https://www. science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.1174251

    2009 doi

  41. [49]

    S. M. Douglas,et al., Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno.Nucleic Acids Research37(15), 5001–5006 (2009), doi:10.1093/nar/gkp436,https://doi.org/10. 1093/nar/gkp436

    2009 doi

  42. [50]

    S. M. Douglas, J. J. Chou, W. M. Shih, DNA-nanotube-induced alignment of membrane proteins for NMR structure determination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences104(16), 6644–6648 (2007), doi:10.1073/pnas.0700930104,https://pnas.org/doi/ full/10.1073/pnas.0700930104

    2007 doi

  43. [51]

    Stahl, T

    E. Stahl, T. G. Martin, F. Praetorius, H. Dietz, Facile and Scalable Preparation of Pure and Dense DNA Origami Solutions.Angewandte Chemie International Edition53(47), 12735– 12740 (2014), doi:10.1002/anie.201405991,https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ abs/10.1002/anie.201405991. 21

    2014 doi

  44. [52]

    P. W. Majewski,et al., Resilient three-dimensional ordered architectures assembled from nanoparticles by DNA.Science Advances7(12), eabf0617 (2021), doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf0617, https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.abf0617

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    C. E. Blanchet,et al., Versatile sample environments and automation for biological solution X-ray scattering experiments at the P12 beamline (PETRA III, DESY).Journal of Applied Crystallography48(2), 431–443 (2015), doi:10.1107/S160057671500254X,//journals. iucr.org/paper?ge5013

    2015 doi

  46. [54]

    S. Haas, X. Sun, A. L. C. Conceic ¸ ˜ao, J. Horbach, S. Pfeffer, The new small-angle X-ray scattering beamline for materials research at PETRA III: SAXSMAT beamline P62.Journal of Synchrotron Radiation30(6), 1156–1167 (2023), doi:10.1107/S1600577523008603,https: //journals.iuc...

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    DNA Funs

    K. Momma, F. Izumi, VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data.Journal of Applied Crystallography44(6), 1272–1276 (2011), doi:10.1107/ S0021889811038970,https://journals.iucr.org/j/issues/2011/06/00/db5098/. Acknowledgments We thank ...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.