Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 67 references

Environmental memory preserves spin quantum resources in polarized hyperon-antihyperon pairs, with a stable hierarchy of coherence over discord over entanglement.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 15:43 UTC pith:FBZGSAJ4

load-bearing objection Useful new application of memory-dephasing dynamics to real BESIII hyperon channels, undercut by an internal contradiction in the hierarchy claim that the authors treat as central. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.07902 v1 pith:FBZGSAJ4 submitted 2026-07-08 quant-ph

Environmental Memory Effects and Quantum Resource Hierarchies in Polarized Hyperon--Antihyperon Systems

classification quant-ph
keywords hyperon-antihyperon pairsquantum resource hierarchynon-Markovian dephasinglogarithmic negativitygeometric quantum discordl1-norm coherencebeam polarizationBESIII
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Hyperon-antihyperon pairs from electron-positron annihilation to J/psi offer a high-energy laboratory for quantum correlations that can be reconstructed from spin observables. This paper shows that when those pairs interact with correlated dephasing environments, memory effects are decisive: non-Markovian dynamics produce recurrent revivals of logarithmic negativity, geometric quantum discord and l1-norm coherence and delay decoherence, while Markovian evolution drives irreversible loss toward stationary mixed states. Beam polarization (longitudinal or transverse) is strongly channel-dependent and can enlarge the accessible correlations. Across all four hyperon channels and both polarizations, a clear resource hierarchy holds: quantum coherence is most robust, geometric discord survives where entanglement collapses, and logarithmic negativity is most fragile. The dependence on production angle, azimuthal angle, polarization degree and memory parameter is mapped with BESIII inputs and is argued to be within reach of BESIII and future high-luminosity machines.

Core claim

Environmental memory plays a crucial role in preserving quantum resources in polarized hyperon-antihyperon systems: non-Markovian information backflow generates recurrent revivals of logarithmic negativity, geometric quantum discord and l1-norm coherence and significantly delays decoherence, while a stable hierarchy (coherence most robust, then geometric discord, logarithmic negativity most sensitive) persists for all considered hyperon channels under both longitudinal and transverse polarizations, using experimental BESIII production parameters.

What carries the argument

Correlated dephasing channel with memory parameter mu and random-telegraph decoherence function K(t), which multiplies the off-diagonal elements of the hyperon X-state by the factor eta(t)=K^2(t)+mu(1-K^2(t)) and thereby controls the dynamical evolution of all three quantifiers.

Load-bearing premise

The only environmental disturbance that matters is pure correlated dephasing of the two spins, fully described by one memory parameter and a random-telegraph noise model; detector resolution, production uncertainties and other noise channels are ignored.

What would settle it

Measure the time-dependent spin correlations of a polarized hyperon-antihyperon sample (e.g. Lambda-antiLambda or Xi-antiXi at BESIII or STCF) under controlled beam polarization and production angle; absence of the predicted non-Markovian revivals of coherence or discord, or a reversal of the claimed hierarchy, would falsify the central claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Non-Markovian memory and high beam polarization together can keep measurable spin entanglement and discord alive long enough for experimental reconstruction at BESIII, STCF or CEPC.
  • l1-norm coherence remains a usable quantum signature even in kinematic regions where logarithmic negativity vanishes.
  • The same resource hierarchy appears for all four hyperon channels, so any one channel can serve as a proxy for testing open-system predictions.
  • Polarization settings and production angles become experimental knobs for maximizing residual quantum resources against decoherence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the pure-dephasing model is only approximate, residual amplitude-damping or detector-induced mixing could erase the revivals before they become observable, so multi-noise extensions are the natural next test.
  • The hierarchy coherence > discord > entanglement is familiar from low-energy open systems; its reappearance here suggests the same ordering may hold for other collider bipartite spins (top pairs, meson pairs).
  • A dedicated polarization scan at fixed production angle could isolate the memory parameter mu without needing absolute time-resolved detection.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies logarithmic negativity, geometric quantum discord, and l1-norm coherence for polarized hyperon–antihyperon pairs produced in e+e-→J/ψ→YȲ (Y=Λ,Σ+,Ξ-,Ξ0). Using BESIII values of αψ and ΔΦ, the authors construct the spin density matrix in Bloch–Fano form, reduce it to an X-state, and evolve it under a correlated pure-dephasing channel with memory parameter μ and random-telegraph decoherence function K(t). They compare Markovian and non-Markovian regimes under longitudinal and transverse beam polarizations, map the dependence on production angle, azimuthal angle, and polarization degree, and claim that non-Markovian information backflow produces recurrent revivals while a stable resource hierarchy (coherence most robust, then geometric discord, logarithmic negativity most fragile) holds for all channels. The predicted effects are argued to be accessible at BESIII, STCF, and CEPC.

Significance. If the hierarchy and memory-protection claims hold after correction, the work supplies a concrete, experimentally parameterized bridge between open-system quantum information and high-energy spin physics. Strengths include the use of published BESIII production parameters (Table I), closed-form expressions for the three quantifiers on the X-state (Eqs. 40–62), and a systematic parametric survey of both polarization configurations and the memory parameter μ. The demonstration that non-Markovian revivals and residual stationary resources survive under realistic hyperon kinematics is of genuine interest for future collider-based quantum-correlation measurements.

major comments (2)
  1. The central hierarchy claim is stated inconsistently. The abstract and the bulk of Sec. V (summaries after Figs. 7–16 and the memory-parameter discussion) assert Cl1 most robust, DG intermediate, LN most sensitive. Sec. V.C and the text surrounding Fig. 20 instead write LN > Cl1 > DG, while Fig. 21 and its caption reverse again to Cl1 > LN > DG. Because the hierarchy is presented as a channel-independent, load-bearing result of the comparative investigation, the numerical curves and the interpretive prose must be brought into agreement (or the claim qualified) before the result can be regarded as established.
  2. Sec. III, Eqs. (29)–(38): the environmental model is restricted to pure correlated dephasing generated by a random-telegraph process. While this is a standard and analytically tractable choice, the manuscript repeatedly frames the conclusions as applying to “environmental disturbances” and “realistic collider environments.” A short discussion of the expected impact of amplitude-damping or detector-resolution noise (or an explicit statement that the hierarchy is demonstrated only for pure dephasing) is needed to keep the scope of the claims commensurate with the model.
minor comments (5)
  1. Introduction and Sec. I: Bell nonlocality and quantum steering are listed among the resources to be analyzed, yet the body of the paper evaluates only LN, geometric discord, and l1 coherence. Either remove the unused quantifiers from the introductory list or add the corresponding calculations.
  2. Sec. II, after Eq. (10): the text refers to “Eq. (4) of the original formulation” without a citation; the explicit matrices Θ(0), Θ(T), Θ(L) should be given or a precise reference supplied.
  3. Several figure captions (e.g., Figs. 5, 8, 11) mix PL and PT labels; the polarization type should be stated unambiguously in each caption.
  4. Table I lists five channels while the abstract and most figures discuss four; the Σ0 channel appears only in the table and should be either analyzed or removed for consistency.
  5. Typographical inconsistencies appear in the hierarchy section (script-L vs LN, script-D vs DG) and in a few reference entries; a uniform notation pass would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: BESIII inputs, standard open-system map and resource measures yield independent dynamical results; hierarchy inconsistency is correctness, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. Production parameters α_ψ and ΔΦ are taken from external BESIII measurements (Table I, Sec. III.A) and enter the initial X-state density matrix (Eqs. 22–28). The correlated dephasing channel is the standard Macchiavello–Palma construction with random-telegraph K(t) (Eqs. 29–38); the memory parameter μ and τ are free model parameters, not fitted to the target resources. Logarithmic negativity, geometric discord and l1-coherence are textbook quantifiers applied to the evolved state (Sec. IV). No free parameter is fitted to a subset of the plotted curves and then re-presented as a prediction; the hierarchy and revival statements are numerical consequences of those independent inputs. Self-citations to the authors’ prior hyperon work are background only and do not force the present hierarchy or memory results. The internal contradiction between abstract/Sec. V summaries (Cl1 most robust) and Fig. 20 text (LN > Cl1 > DG) is a correctness inconsistency, not a circular reduction of outputs to inputs. Score 0 is therefore appropriate.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard open-system and quantum-information axioms plus one modeling choice (pure correlated dephasing) and a handful of experimental numbers taken as fixed inputs; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • memory parameter μ = scanned 0 to 1
    Continuous free parameter (0 ≤ μ ≤ 1) that interpolates between uncorrelated and fully correlated dephasing; scanned by hand rather than fitted to data.
  • telegraph correlation time τ = 0.2 or 5
    Sets Markovian (τ = 0.2) versus non-Markovian (τ = 5) regimes; chosen by hand to illustrate the two dynamical classes.
  • beam polarization degrees PL, PT = scanned 0-1
    External control parameters scanned from 0 to 1; not fitted but free experimental knobs.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The hyperon-antihyperon spin state is completely described by the 4 imes4 Bloch-Fano density matrix constructed from measured α_ψ and ΔΦ (Sec. II).
    Standard in the hyperon literature; taken as given from BESIII analyses.
  • ad hoc to paper Environmental noise is pure dephasing generated by a random-telegraph process with Kraus operators that include classical memory μ (Sec. III, Eqs. 30-38).
    A modeling choice that excludes amplitude damping, detector noise and production uncertainties; load-bearing for all dynamical claims.
  • standard math Local unitary transformations that diagonalize the correlation tensor leave entanglement, discord and coherence invariant.
    Standard quantum-information fact used to reduce the state to X form.
  • standard math Logarithmic negativity, one-norm geometric discord and l1 coherence are valid resource monotones for the two-qubit X states under consideration.
    Taken from the cited resource-theory literature.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 33233 in / 2843 out tokens · 31947 ms · 2026-07-10T15:43:48.578279+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Hyperon--antihyperon pairs produced in $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow J/\psi\rightarrow Y\bar{Y}$ ($Y=\Lambda,\Sigma^{+},\Xi^{-},\Xi^{0}$) constitute a unique high-energy platform for probing quantum correlations through experimentally accessible spin observables. We investigate the impact of correlated dephasing environments on the stationary and dynamical properties of logarithmic negativity, geometric quantum discord, and $l_{1}$-norm quantum coherence under both longitudinal and transverse beam polarizations. Our analysis reveals that environmental memory plays a crucial role in preserving quantum resources. In the non-Markovian regime, information backflow generates recurrent revivals of quantum correlations and significantly delays decoherence, whereas Markovian evolution drives the system toward asymptotic stationary states through an irreversible loss of quantum information. The influence of beam polarization is found to be strongly channel dependent and can substantially enhance the amount of accessible quantum correlations. A comparative investigation of different quantifiers uncovers a clear hierarchy of quantum resources. Quantum coherence remains robust over the widest parameter range, geometric quantum discord survives even in regions where entanglement is strongly reduced, while logarithmic negativity is the most sensitive to environmental degradation. This hierarchy persists for all considered hyperon channels and under both polarization configurations. The dependence of quantum resources on the production angle, azimuthal angle, polarization degree, and memory parameter is examined using experimental inputs from BESIII. The predicted effects are found to be compatible with the precision expected at BESIII and future high-luminosity facilities such as STCF and CEPC.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07902 by Mohamed Amazioug, Omar Bachain, Rachid Ahl Laamara.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the physical framework considered in this work. Polarized electron–positron beams produce the process e + e − → J/ψ → YY¯, where Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , Ξ 0 . The longitudinal (PL) and transverse (PT ) beam polarizations, together with the production angles (θ, ϕ), determine the spin state of the hyperon pair. Environmental interactions are modeled through correlated dephasing channels… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Dynamical evolution of the logarithmic negativity LN(ρ PL YY¯ ) as a function of time and the longitudinal polarization degree PL for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at cos θ = 0.5. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Dynamical evolution of the geometric quantum discord DG(ρ PL YY¯ ) as a function of time and the longitudinal polarization degree PL for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at cos θ = 0.5. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I. The oscillatory pattern disappears and the entanglem… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dynamical evolution of the l1-norm quantum coherence Cl1 (ρ PL YY¯ ) as a function of time and the longitudinal polarization degree PL for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at cos θ = 0.5. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I. The dynamics of the l1-norm quantum coherence Cl1 … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dynamical evolution of the logarithmic negativity LN(ρ PL YY¯ ) as a function of time and the production angle cos θ for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at PL = 0.8. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I. The dynamical behavior of the logarithmic negativity LN(ρ PT YY¯ ), sho… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dynamical evolution of the geometric quantum discord DG(ρ PL YY¯ ) as a function of time and the production angle cos θ for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at PL = 0.8. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I. A markedly different behavior appears in the Markovian regime [Figs.… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Dynamical evolution of the l1-norm quantum coherence Cl1 (ρ PL YY¯ ) as a function of time and the production angle cos θ for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at PL = 0.8. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Dynamical evolution of the logarithmic negativity LN(ρ PT YY¯ ) as a function of time and the transverse polarization degree PT for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at cos θ = 0.5 and ϕ = 0. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I. The evolution of the logarithmic negativity LN … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Dynamical evolution of the geometric quantum discord DG(ρ PT YY¯ ) as a function of time and the transverse polarization degree PT for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at cos θ = 0.5 and ϕ = 0. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I. The behavior of the geometric quantum discor… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Dynamical evolution of the l1-norm quantum coherence Cl1 (ρ PT YY¯ ) as a function of time and the transverse polarization degree PT for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at cos θ = 0.5 and ϕ = 0. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Dynamical evolution of the logarithmic negativity LN(ρ PT YY¯ ) as a function of time and the production angle cos θ for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at PT = 0.8 and ϕ = 0. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I. The logarithmic negativity LN(ρ PT YY¯ ) is depicted in [PI… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Dynamical evolution of the geometric quantum discord DG(ρ PT YY¯ ) as a function of time and the production angle cos θ for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at PT = 0.8 and ϕ = 0. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I. The geometric quantum discord DG(ρ PT YY¯ ) as a function… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Dynamical evolution of the l1-norm quantum coherence Cl1 (ρ PT YY¯ ) as a function of time and the production angle cos θ for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at PT = 0.8 and ϕ = 0. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Dynamical evolution of the logarithmic negativity LN(ρ PT YY¯ ) as a function of time and the azimuthal angle ϕ for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at cos θ = 0.5 and PT = 0.8. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Dynamical evolution of the geometric quantum discord DG(ρ PT YY¯ ) as a function of time and the azimuthal angle ϕ for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at cos θ = 0.5 and PT = 0.8. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I. The dependence of the geometric quantum discord DG(ρ PT … view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Dynamical evolution of the l1-norm quantum coherence Cl1 (ρ PT YY¯ ) as a function of time and the azimuthal angle ϕ for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at cos θ = 0.5 and PT = 0.8. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Table I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Time evolution of the logarithmic negativity LN(ρ PT YY¯ ) for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 for different values of the memory parameter µ at cos θ = 0.5, PT = 0, and ϕ = 0. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2). The experimental parameters are taken from Table I. The effect of the memory parameter µ on the dynamical evolution of the … view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Time evolution of the geometric quantum discord DG(ρ PT YY¯ ) for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 for different values of the memory parameter µ at cos θ = 0.5, PT = 0, and ϕ = 0. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2). The experimental parameters are taken from Table I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Time evolution of the l1-norm quantum coherence Cl1 (ρ PT YY¯ ) for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 for different values of the memory parameter µ at cos θ = 0.5, PT = 0, and ϕ = 0. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2). The experimental parameters are taken from Table I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Hierarchy of quantum resources characterized by the l1-norm quantum coherence Cl1 (ρ PL YY¯ ), geometric quantum discord DG(ρ PL YY¯ ), and logarithmic negativity LN(ρ PL YY¯ ) for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at cos θ = 0.5 and PL = 0.8. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken from Tab… view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Hierarchy of quantum resources characterized by the l1-norm quantum coherence Cl1 (ρ PT YY¯ ), geometric quantum discord DG(ρ PT YY¯ ), and logarithmic negativity LN(ρ PT YY¯ ) for J/ψ → YY¯ with Y = Λ, Σ + , Ξ − , and Ξ 0 at PT = 0.8, cos θ = 0.5, and ϕ = 0. Panels (a)–(d) [(e)–(h)] correspond to the non-Markovian (Markovian) regime with τ = 5 (τ = 0.2) and µ = 0.4. The experimental parameters are taken … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Einstein , author B

    author author A. Einstein , author B. Podolsky , \ and\ author N. Rosen , title title Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 journal journal Phys. Rev. volume 47 ,\ pages 777--780 ( year 1935 )

  2. [2]

    Schr\"odinger , title title Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems , https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100013554 journal journal Proc

    author author E. Schr\"odinger , title title Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems , https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100013554 journal journal Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. volume 31 ,\ pages 555--563 ( year 1935 )

  3. [3]

    author author J. S. Bell , title title On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox , journal journal Physics volume 1 ,\ pages 195--200 ( year 1964 )

  4. [4]

    Horodecki , author P

    author author R. Horodecki , author P. Horodecki , author M. Horodecki , \ and\ author K. Horodecki , title title Quantum Entanglement , https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 81 ,\ pages 865--942 ( year 2009 )

  5. [5]

    author author M. A. Nielsen and author I. L. Chuang , title title Quantum Computation and Quantum Information publisher Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ( year 2010 )

  6. [6]

    Baumgratz , author M

    author author T. Baumgratz , author M. Cramer , and author M. B. Plenio , title title Quantifying Coherence , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.140401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 113 ,\ pages 140401 ( year 2014 )

  7. [7]

    Streltsov , author G

    author author A. Streltsov , author G. Adesso , and author M. B. Plenio , title title Colloquium: Quantum Coherence as a Resource , https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.041003 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 89 ,\ pages 041003 ( year 2017 )

  8. [8]

    author author W. H. Zurek , title title Decoherence, Einselection, and the Quantum Origins of the Classical , https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 75 ,\ pages 715--775 ( year 2003 )

  9. [9]

    Breuer and author F

    author author H.-P. Breuer and author F. Petruccione , title title The Theory of Open Quantum Systems , publisher publisher Oxford University Press , address Oxford ( year 2002 )

  10. [10]

    Breuer , author E.-M

    author author H.-P. Breuer , author E.-M. Laine , and author J. Piilo , title title Measure for the Degree of Non-Markovian Behavior of Quantum Processes in Open Systems , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.210401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 103 ,\ pages 210401 ( year 2009 )

  11. [11]

    Rivas , author S

    author author Á. Rivas , author S. F. Huelga , and author M. B. Plenio , title title Quantum Non-Markovianity: Characterization, Quantification and Detection , https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2014.915522 journal journal Contemp. Phys. volume 55 ,\ pages 181--197 ( year 2014 )

  12. [13]

    Bachain , author M

    author author O. Bachain , author M. Amazioug , author R. Ahl Laamara , author K. S. Nisar , author M. Zakarya , author G. M. Ismail , and author A.-H. Abdel-Aty , title title Quantum thermodynamics, quantum correlations and quantum coherence in accelerating Unruh--DeWitt detectors in both steady and dynamical state , https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-0...

  13. [14]

    Bachain , author M

    author author O. Bachain , author M. Amazioug , and author R. Ahl Laamara , title title Multiparameter quantum estimation and Stirling engine performance in a gravitational cat state system , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2026.117543 journal journal Nucl. Phys. B volume 1022 , pages 117543 ( year 2026 )

  14. [15]

    Fano , title title Pairs of Two-Level Systems , https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.55.855 journal journal Rev

    author author U. Fano , title title Pairs of Two-Level Systems , https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.55.855 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 55 ,\ pages 855--874 ( year 1983 )

  15. [16]

    Fetscher and author H.-J

    author author W. Fetscher and author H.-J. Gerber , title title Quantum entanglement and Bell tests in hyperon--antihyperon systems , journal journal Universe volume 9 , pages 365 ( year 2023 )

  16. [17]

    Tandean , title title Tests of quantum correlations and entanglement in hyperon pair production , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.076018 journal journal Phys

    author author J. Tandean , title title Tests of quantum correlations and entanglement in hyperon pair production , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.076018 journal journal Phys. Rev. D volume 109 , pages 076018 ( year 2024 ) author author U. Fano , title title Pairs of Two-Level Systems , https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.55.855 journal journal Rev. M...

  17. [18]

    Afik \ and\ author J

    author author Y. Afik \ and\ author J. R. M. de Nova , title title Entanglement and Quantum Information in High-Energy Physics , https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031620-102314 journal journal Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. volume 13 ,\ pages 37--60 ( year 2022 )

  18. [19]

    Lisi , author A

    author author E. Lisi , author A. Marrone , and author D. Montanino , title title Probing Possible Decoherence Effects in Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1166 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 85 , pages 1166--1169 ( year 2000 )

  19. [20]

    author author N. E. Mavromatos , title title CPT Violation and Decoherence in Quantum Gravity , https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X10050792 journal journal Int. J. Mod. Phys. A volume 25 , pages 5409--5485 ( year 2010 )

  20. [21]

    author author H. W. Zhang , author X. Cao , and author T. F. Feng , title title Manipulating Bell nonlocality and entanglement in polarized electron-positron annihilation , https://doi.org/10.1103/5br1-z3g9 journal journal Phys. Rev. D volume 113 , pages 114022 ( year 2026 )

  21. [22]

    Jaloum and author M

    author author E. Jaloum and author M. Amazioug , title title Controlling the dynamical evolution of quantum coherence and quantum correlations in e^ + e^ - processes at BESIII , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.113.016024 journal journal Phys. Rev. D volume 113 , pages 016024 ( year 2026 )

  22. [23]

    Fabbrichesi , author R

    author author M. Fabbrichesi , author R. Floreanini , and author E. Gabrielli , title title Bell inequalities in high-energy physics , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103812 journal journal Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. volume 123 , pages 103812 ( year 2021 )

  23. [24]

    Fabbrichesi , author A

    author author M. Fabbrichesi , author A. Tonero , and author G. Panizzo , title title Testing Bell inequalities at colliders , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.056008 journal journal Phys. Rev. D volume 106 , pages 056008 ( year 2022 )

  24. [25]

    Perotti , author G

    author author E. Perotti , author G. F\"aldt , author A. Kup\'s\'c , author S. Leupold , and author J. J. Song , title title Polarization Observables in e^ + e^ - Annihilation to a Baryon--Antibaryon Pair , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.056008 journal journal Phys. Rev. D volume 99 ,\ pages 056008 ( year 2019 )

  25. [26]

    Ablikim et al

    author author M. Ablikim et al. ( collaboration BESIII Collaboration ), title title Probing CP Symmetry and Weak Phases with Entangled ^- ^+ Pairs , https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04883-6 journal journal Nature volume 606 ,\ pages 287--292 ( year 2022 )

  26. [28]

    Wu , author C

    author author S. Wu , author C. Qian , author Q. Wang , \ and\ author X.-R. Zhou , title title Bell Nonlocality and Entanglement in e^ + e^ - Y Y at BESIII , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.054012 journal journal Phys. Rev. D volume 110 ,\ pages 054012 ( year 2024 )

  27. [29]

    Ablikim et al

    author author M. Ablikim et al. ( organization BESIII Collaboration ), title title Polarization and Entanglement in Baryon--Antibaryon Pair Production in Electron--Positron Annihilation , https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0494-8 journal journal Nat. Phys. volume 15 ,\ pages 631--634 ( year 2019 )

  28. [30]

    Achasov et al

    author author M. Achasov et al. , title title STCF Conceptual Design Report (Volume 1): Physics and Detector , https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-023-1333-z journal journal Front. Phys. volume 19 , pages 14701 ( year 2024 )

  29. [31]

    author author CEPC Study Group , title title CEPC Technical Design Report: Accelerator , https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.14363 journal journal arXiv:2312.14363 ( year 2023 )

  30. [32]

    D\"ur , author G

    author author W. D\"ur , author G. Vidal , and author J. I. Cirac , title title Three Qubits Can Be Entangled in Two Inequivalent Ways , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.62.062314 journal journal Phys. Rev. A volume 62 ,\ pages 062314 ( year 2000 )

  31. [33]

    author author C. H. Bennett , author D. P. DiVincenzo , author J. A. Smolin , and author W. K. Wootters , title title Mixed-State Entanglement and Quantum Error Correction , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3824 journal journal Phys. Rev. A volume 54 ,\ pages 3824--3851 ( year 1996 )

  32. [34]

    Kraus , title title States, Effects, and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory publisher Springer-Verlag, Berlin ( year 1983 )

    author author K. Kraus , title title States, Effects, and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory publisher Springer-Verlag, Berlin ( year 1983 )

  33. [35]

    Macchiavello and author G

    author author C. Macchiavello and author G. M. Palma , title title Entanglement-enhanced information transmission over a quantum channel with correlated noise , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.050301 journal journal Phys. Rev. A volume 65 ,\ pages 050301(R) ( year 2002 )

  34. [36]

    Daffer , author K

    author author S. Daffer , author K. Wodkiewicz , author J. D. Cresser , and author J. K. McIver , title title Depolarizing Channel as a Completely Positive Map with Memory , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.70.010304 journal journal Phys. Rev. A volume 70 ,\ pages 010304(R) ( year 2004 )

  35. [37]

    Mazzola , author J

    author author L. Mazzola , author J. Piilo , and author S. Maniscalco , title title Sudden Transition between Classical and Quantum Decoherence , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.200401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 104 ,\ pages 200401 ( year 2010 )

  36. [38]

    Ablikim et al

    author author M. Ablikim et al. ( organization BESIII Collaboration ), title title Test of CP Symmetry in the Neutral Decays of via J/ , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.135.141804 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 135 ,\ pages 141804 ( year 2025 )

  37. [39]

    Ablikim et al

    author author M. Ablikim et al. ( organization BESIII Collaboration ), title title Precise Measurements of Decay Parameters and CP Asymmetry with Entangled - Pairs , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.131801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 129 ,\ pages 131801 ( year 2022 )

  38. [40]

    Ablikim et al

    author author M. Ablikim et al. ( organization BESIII Collaboration ), title title Study of J/ and (3686) Decays to and ^ 0 ^ 0 Final States , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.052003 journal journal Phys. Rev. D volume 95 ,\ pages 052003 ( year 2017 )

  39. [41]

    Ablikim et al

    author author M. Ablikim et al. ( organization BES Collaboration ), title title Measurements of (2S) and J/ Decays into ^ 0 ^ 0 and ^ 0 ^ 0 Final States , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.092005 journal journal Phys. Rev. D volume 78 ,\ pages 092005 ( year 2008 )

  40. [42]

    Ablikim et al

    author author M. Ablikim et al. ( organization BESIII Collaboration ), title title Polarization and Entanglement in the Process J/ ^ + ^ - , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.052004 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 125 ,\ pages 052004 ( year 2020 )

  41. [43]

    Ablikim et al

    author author M. Ablikim et al. ( organization BESIII Collaboration ), title title Observation of Spin Polarization and Entanglement in J/ ^ 0 ^ 0 Decays , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.101902 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 133 ,\ pages 101902 ( year 2024 )

  42. [44]

    Ablikim et al

    author author M. Ablikim et al. ( organization BESIII Collaboration ), title title Observation of Spin Polarization and Entanglement in J/ ^ 0 ^ 0 Decays , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.136.201802 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 136 ,\ pages 201802 ( year 2026 )

  43. [45]

    Ablikim et al

    author author M. Ablikim et al. ( organization BESIII Collaboration ), title title Evidence of Entanglement and Bell Nonlocality in ^ - ^ + Hyperon Pairs , https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04745-4 journal journal Nature volume 606 ,\ pages 64--69 ( year 2022 )

  44. [46]

    author author R. L. Workman et al. ( organization Particle Data Group ), title title Review of Particle Physics , https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptac097 journal journal Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. volume 2022 ,\ pages 083C01 ( year 2022 )

  45. [47]

    Ablikim et al

    author author M. Ablikim et al. ( organization BESIII Collaboration ), title title Measurements of (3686) ^ - ^ + and (3686) (1385)^ (1385)^ , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.04.052 journal journal Phys. Lett. B volume 770 ,\ pages 217--224 ( year 2017 )

  46. [48]

    Ablikim et al

    author author M. Ablikim et al. ( organization BESIII Collaboration ), title title Observation of Spin Polarization and Entanglement in J/ ^ 0 ^ 0 Decays , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L031106 journal journal Phys. Rev. D volume 108 ,\ pages L031106 ( year 2023 )

  47. [49]

    Peres , title title Separability Criterion for Density Matrices , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413 journal journal Phys

    author author A. Peres , title title Separability Criterion for Density Matrices , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 77 ,\ pages 1413 ( year 1996 )

  48. [50]

    Horodecki , author P

    author author M. Horodecki , author P. Horodecki , and author R. Horodecki , title title Separability of Mixed States: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions , https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00706-2 journal journal Phys. Lett. A volume 223 ,\ pages 1--8 ( year 1996 )

  49. [51]

    Vidal and author R

    author author G. Vidal and author R. F. Werner , title title Computable Measure of Entanglement , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314 journal journal Phys. Rev. A volume 65 ,\ pages 032314 ( year 2002 )

  50. [52]

    author author M. B. Plenio , title title Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.090503 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 95 ,\ pages 090503 ( year 2005 )

  51. [53]

    Ollivier and author W

    author author H. Ollivier and author W. H. Zurek , title title Quantum Discord: A Measure of the Quantumness of Correlations , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.017901 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 88 ,\ pages 017901 ( year 2001 )

  52. [54]

    Henderson and author V

    author author L. Henderson and author V. Vedral , title title Classical, quantum and total correlations , https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/315 journal journal J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. volume 34 ,\ pages 6899 ( year 2001 )

  53. [55]

    Luo and author S

    author author S. Luo and author S. Fu , title title Geometric measure of quantum discord , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.034302 journal journal Phys. Rev. A volume 82 ,\ pages 034302 ( year 2010 )

  54. [56]

    Ali , author A

    author author M. Ali , author A. R. P. Rau , and author G. Alber , title title Quantum Discord for Two-Qubit X States , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.042105 journal journal Phys. Rev. A volume 81 ,\ pages 042105 ( year 2010 )

  55. [57]

    Dakic , author V

    author author B. Dakic , author V. Vedral , and author C. Brukner , title title Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Nonzero Quantum Discord , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.190502 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 105 ,\ pages 190502 ( year 2010 )

  56. [58]

    Modi , author A

    author author K. Modi , author A. Brodutch , author H. Cable , author T. Paterek , and author V. Vedral , title title The Classical-Quantum Boundary for Correlations: Discord and Related Measures , https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1655 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 84 ,\ pages 1655 ( year 2012 )

  57. [59]

    Hu , author X

    author author M.-L. Hu , author X. Hu , author J.-C. Wang , author Y. Peng , and author H. Fan , title title Quantum Correlation and Quantum Discord , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.07.001 journal journal Phys. Rep. volume 762 ,\ pages 1--100 ( year 2018 )

  58. [60]

    author author F. M. Paula , author T. R. de Oliveira , and author M. S. Sarandy , title title Geometric Quantum Discord through the Schatten 1-Norm , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.064101 journal journal Phys. Rev. A volume 87 ,\ pages 064101 ( year 2013 )

  59. [61]

    Nakano , author M

    author author T. Nakano , author M. Piani , and author G. Adesso , title title Negativity of Quantumness and Its Interpretations , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.012117 journal journal Phys. Rev. A volume 88 ,\ pages 012117 ( year 2013 )

  60. [62]

    Ciccarello et al., title title Quantum correlations and trace-distance discord , https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/013038 journal journal New J

    author author F. Ciccarello et al., title title Quantum correlations and trace-distance discord , https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/013038 journal journal New J. Phys. volume 16 ,\ pages 013038 ( year 2014 )

  61. [63]

    Fano , title title Description of States in Quantum Mechanics by Density Matrix and Operator Techniques , https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.74 journal journal Rev

    author author U. Fano , title title Description of States in Quantum Mechanics by Density Matrix and Operator Techniques , https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.74 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 29 ,\ pages 74 ( year 1957 )

  62. [64]

    Quantifying Superposition

    author author J. Aberg , title title Quantifying Superposition , https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0612146 journal arXiv:quant-ph/0612146 ( year 2006 )

  63. [65]

    Winter and author D

    author author A. Winter and author D. Yang , title title Operational Resource Theory of Coherence , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.120404 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 116 ,\ pages 120404 ( year 2016 )

  64. [66]

    Ablikim et al

    author author M. Ablikim et al. ( collaboration BESIII Collaboration ), title title Unraveling the Structure of Hyperons with Polarized Pairs , https://doi.org/10.1103/9f1h-fl4k journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 135 , pages 191902 ( year 2025 )

  65. [67]

    Benatti and author R

    author author F. Benatti and author R. Floreanini , title title Open system approach to neutral kaon dynamics , https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2000/02/032 journal journal J. High Energy Phys. volume 02 , pages 032 ( year 2000 )

  66. [68]

    author author R. A. Bertlmann and author B. C. Hiesmayr , title title Bell inequalities for entangled kaons and their unitary time evolution , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.062112 journal journal Phys. Rev. A volume 63 , pages 062112 ( year 2001 )

  67. [69]

    de Vega and author D

    author author I. de Vega and author D. Alonso , title title Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems , https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015001 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 89 , pages 015001 ( year 2017 )