Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 77 references

SKA-Low can map mid-latitude ionospheric irregularities in unprecedented detail by treating the ionosphere as a phase screen sampled across its dense core and spiral-arm baselines.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 07:46 UTC pith:FYF7WM27

load-bearing objection Solid AASKA-II methods chapter that organises a decade of MWA/LOFAR ionospheric work and maps it cleanly onto SKA-Low requirements; no new result, but the synthesis and technical checklist are useful.

arxiv 2607.08416 v1 pith:FYF7WM27 submitted 2026-07-09 astro-ph.IM

Methods of Observing and Characterising the Ionosphere with SKA-Low

John Morgan , Biagio Forte , Kshitija Deshpande , Andrzej Krankowski , Mario Bisi This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords ionosphereSKA-Lowradio interferometryphase screenscintillationtotal electron contentspace weathercalibration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This chapter shows that SKA-Low is not only affected by the ionosphere but can itself become a powerful mid-latitude probe of it. The authors review how plasma irregularities act as a phase screen that imprints measurable phase gradients, refractive shifts and amplitude scintillation on radio waves from astrophysical sources. They catalogue a full spectrum of techniques already demonstrated on precursors—baseline structure functions, image-plane vector fields of refractive shifts, multi-station amplitude scintillation, secondary spectra, and iterative forward-modelling with 3D physical plasma codes—and argue that the AA4 layout, sensitivity and station beams make all of them viable at once. Meeting a short list of technical requirements on data products, cadence and station usage will turn routine observations into high-resolution maps of electron-density structure, height, velocity and anisotropy. A reader who cares about space weather or about pushing low-frequency cosmology and transient science to their limits will recognise that better knowledge of the ionosphere above the array serves both goals.

Core claim

SKA-Low’s station density, baseline range and sensitivity enable a broad suite of phase-screen and scintillation measurements—structure functions, refractive-shift maps, multi-station amplitude scintillation, secondary spectra and forward-model inversion—that can reconstruct mid-latitude ionospheric irregularities from hundreds of metres to tens of kilometres, provided the data-product and observing requirements of Section 5 are met.

What carries the argument

The ionosphere cast as a thin phase screen whose diffraction pattern on the ground is sampled by the array; the ratio of Fresnel scale to diffractive scale sets the scintillation regime, while multi-station correlations and secondary spectra extract velocity, anisotropy and height.

Load-bearing premise

The mid-latitude ionosphere above the site produces scintillation and refractive signatures often enough, and on spatial scales matched to the array, for the multi-station and secondary-spectrum methods to return scientifically useful constraints.

What would settle it

Continuous monitoring with a core subset of stations over a full solar cycle that yields almost no events with detectable amplitude scintillation (modulation index above a few percent) or coherent refractive features above the noise floor would show that the multi-station and secondary-spectrum techniques do not deliver the claimed scientific return at this latitude.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Real-time ionospheric products from the core will allow dynamic scheduling that avoids or exploits disturbed conditions for different science programmes.
  • Structure-function measurements spanning three orders of baseline length will tightly constrain the power-law index of mid-latitude turbulence.
  • Multi-station scintillation maps will resolve field-aligned anisotropy and multiple scattering screens simultaneously.
  • Forward-model inversion will recover layer thickness, spectral index and axial ratio of turbulent plasma at mid-latitudes.
  • Even a single station or early core configuration can produce useful all-sky scintillation indices during commissioning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same multi-station and secondary-spectrum pipelines can be run retrospectively on existing LOFAR and MWA archives to build a mid-latitude climatology before full SKA-Low operations.
  • Visibility-domain scintillation methods, still largely untested, could extract source-by-source phase screens without imaging and thereby lower the cost of real-time monitoring.
  • Routine parallax imaging with outer-arm stations would map the altitude distribution of travelling ionospheric disturbances, a quantity that remains sparse at mid-latitudes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This chapter reviews the mid-latitude ionosphere and its effects on low-frequency radio waves, then surveys methods by which SKA-Low can characterise the ionosphere treated as a phase screen. It covers baseline-based structure functions, image-plane refractive shifts (including parallax), single- and multi-station amplitude scintillation, secondary spectra, and the largely untested Cronyn visibility-scintillation framework. A forward-modelling approach that couples 3-D plasma and electromagnetic propagation models to interferometric observables is outlined, drawing on polar-region successes. Section 5 maps these techniques onto the AA4 station layout, supplies order-of-magnitude S/N estimates from the public SKA sensitivity calculator, and lists data-product and station requirements needed for viability.

Significance. If the technical requirements of Section 5 are met, SKA-Low would become a uniquely powerful mid-latitude ionospheric observatory, combining dense core baselines, multi-station diffraction-pattern sampling, and wide-field refractive-shift imaging at sensitivities far exceeding GNSS or beacon networks. The chapter usefully consolidates a decade of precursor results (MWA, LOFAR) and flags both established and untested techniques (Cronyn 1972; Brisken-style secondary spectra). The scintools demonstration and the Deshpande-style 3-D inversion pathway are concrete, reproducible starting points for future work. The contribution is organisational and prospective rather than a new empirical result, which is appropriate for an AASKAII methods chapter.

minor comments (5)
  1. Figure 1 caption and surrounding text: the intermediate-regime boundary (r_F/r_diff ~ 0.1) is stated without a quantitative reference; a short citation or sentence clarifying the adopted threshold would help readers place the Mevius et al. range.
  2. Section 3.5: Cronyn (1972) is correctly flagged as untested for ionospheric work; a one-sentence note on the practical obstacle (source isolation in the visibility domain for a wide FoV) would make the feasibility discussion more self-contained.
  3. Section 5.1: the S/N estimates (4 Jy for scintillation index, 20 Jy for power-spectrum analysis) are useful but frequency-dependent source counts and confusion are only mentioned qualitatively; a brief pointer to expected source densities at 50 MHz versus 350 MHz would strengthen the claim that 'many sources' are available.
  4. Throughout: a few typographical inconsistencies remain (e.g., 'Kolmorogorov', 'ionspheric', duplicated Ghidoni et al. 2025 entries). A light copy-edit pass would remove them.
  5. Section 2.2: the deliberate exclusion of Faraday rotation and multi-instrument synergies is stated clearly; a single forward reference to other AASKAII chapters (if any) that treat those topics would improve cross-chapter navigation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: methods review with independent observational citations and no fitted-parameter predictions.

full rationale

This is a review/methods chapter surveying ionospheric phase-screen and scintillation techniques (structure functions, refractive shifts, multi-station amplitude scintillation, secondary spectra, forward modelling) and their prospective application to SKA-Low. It contains no novel numerical derivation, no free parameters fitted to data and then re-presented as predictions, and no uniqueness theorems or ansatzes whose sole support is a self-citation. Self-citations (e.g. Waszewski et al. 2022, Deshpande et al. 2014/2016/2019, Forte et al.) refer to prior observational or modelling papers that stand as independent empirical or computational results; they are not load-bearing for a claimed first-principles result. Figure 1 and Section 5.1 simply place published r_diff ranges and S/N estimates against the array layout; nothing reduces by construction to its own inputs. The paper is therefore self-contained as a prospective methods overview and scores 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a methods review the paper inherits standard ionospheric and interferometric assumptions rather than introducing free parameters or new entities. The few numerical choices (height 300 km, r_diff range from Mevius 2016, Kolmogorov index) are taken from prior literature and used only for illustration.

free parameters (2)
  • illustrative r_diff = 5 km at 150 MHz
    Chosen for the scintools demonstration in Fig. 2 as the 90th-percentile activity reported by Mevius et al. (2016); not fitted to new data.
  • assumed irregularity height 300 km
    Standard mid-latitude F-region height used throughout Fresnel-scale and pierce-point calculations; literature value, not re-fitted.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Weak-to-intermediate scattering phase-screen approximation is adequate for most mid-latitude SKA-Low conditions
    Invoked in Sections 2.3 and 3 and Fig. 1; justified by Mevius et al. r_diff statistics but not re-validated for the full SKA-Low band.
  • domain assumption Ionospheric turbulence can be described by a power-law structure function close to Kolmogorov
    Used to reconcile refractive-shift and scintillation scales (Section 3.3); taken from Mevius et al. (2016).
  • domain assumption Astrophysical sources act as point-like or known-size probes after source-size correction
    Required for interpreting scintillation indices and secondary spectra (Section 2.3).

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 21954 in / 2208 out tokens · 19889 ms · 2026-07-10T07:46:40.218414+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The ionosphere and its behaviour critically affects ground-based radio instruments at low frequencies, and radio interferometry has been used as a probe of the ionosphere since the earliest days of radio astronomy. In this chapter, we aim to give an overview of the ionosphere and its salient properties in the mid-latitudes where the SKAO instruments are located. We provide a comprehensive review of its impact on the astrophysical radio signals which traverse it. We then focus on the ionosphere as a phase screen, and the many ways in which the ionospheric structure can be measured using a low-frequency interferometer such as SKA-Low. Our aim here is to provide the broadest possible spectrum of measurement approaches. We place particular emphasis on the wide range of innovative approaches that have been developed for SKA precursors and pathfinders over the last decade, however we also draw attention to other approaches, some untested, that appear in the literature. Next, we consider an innovative approach for deducing the detailed physical conditions in the ionosphere from SKA observables via iterative simulations with a sophisticated physical model from which the interferometric response can be forward-modelled. This approach has proven extremely successful for interpreting large scale observations in the complex polar region of the ionosphere, and we discuss how it can be applied to the SKA-Low. Finally, we provide a summary of the technical requirements which will ensure viability of the various techniques discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08416 by Andrzej Krankowski, Biagio Forte, John Morgan, Kshitija Deshpande, Mario Bisi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Following Waszewski et al. (2022) and Cornwell et al. (1989). We use the range of 𝑟diff observed by Mevius et al. (2016). Large 𝑟diff (weaker fluctuations) are at the bottom-left of each line. Small 𝑟diff (stronger fluctuations) are towards the top right. 3.1 Baseline-based phase measurements Radio interferometers are outstanding instruments for characterising phase screens such as the ionosphere (Bastian … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Output of scintools package amplitude and phase scintillation for a single ground location for slightly disturbed ionospheric conditions. Isotropic Kolmogorov turbulence with 𝑟diff=5 km at 150 MHz, ionospheric height of 300 km is assumed. Top two panels: amplitude and phase respectively across the full SKA band. The three x-axis scales are common to both plots and are connected by an assumed piercepoint ve… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Layout of the SKA-low (AA4 configuration) with inserts showing the high-density core (top right), and the stations of a single spiral arm cluster (bottom right.) The SKA-low AA4 will consist of 512 individual stations, each consisting in turn of 256 antennas covering a circular patch approx. 40 m in diameter. The layout of the 512 stations is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    E. V. Appleton. Institution of Electrical Engineers-Proceedings of the Wireless Section, 7 0 (21): 0 257--265, 1932. doi:10.1049/pws.1932.0027

    work page doi:10.1049/pws.1932.0027 1932

  2. [2]

    B. S. Arora et al. , 32: 0 e029, August 2015. doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.29

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.29 2015

  3. [3]

    D. S. Balser et al. In D. A. Bohlender , D. Durand , and P. Dowler , editors, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII, volume 411 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, page 330, September 2009

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Radio Observational Constraints on Turbulent Astrophysical Plasmas

    T. Bastian et al. Astro2020: Decadal Survey on Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2020: 0 307, May 2019. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1904.05807

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.05807 2020

  5. [5]

    Bonaldi et al

    A. Bonaldi et al. , 543 0 (2): 0 1092--1119, October 2025. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1466

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1466 2025

  6. [6]

    B. H. Briggs , G. J. Phillips , and D. H. Shinn . Proceedings of the Physical Society B, 63 0 (2): 0 106--121, February 1950. doi:10.1088/0370-1301/63/2/305

    work page doi:10.1088/0370-1301/63/2/305 1950

  7. [7]

    B. H. Briggs et al. , 223 0 (5213): 0 1321--1325, September 1969. doi:10.1038/2231321a0

    work page doi:10.1038/2231321a0 1969

  8. [8]

    W. F. Brisken et al. , 708 0 (1): 0 232--243, January 2010. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/232

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/708/1/232 2010

  9. [9]

    Chang et al

    O. Chang et al. Space Weather, 17 0 (7): 0 1114--1130, July 2019. doi:10.1029/2018SW002142

    work page doi:10.1029/2018sw002142 2019

  10. [10]

    J. K. Chege et al. , 38: 0 e028, June 2021. doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.22

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.22 2021

  11. [11]

    Cherniak , A

    I. Cherniak , A. Krankowski , and I. Zakharenkova . Radio Science, 49 0 (8): 0 653--662, August 2014. doi:10.1002/2014RS005433

    work page doi:10.1002/2014rs005433 2014

  12. [12]

    Chhetri et al

    R. Chhetri et al. Understanding sub-arcsecond scale radio sources and space weather with the ska-low using interplanetary scintillation. In Advancing Astrophysics with the SKA -- II (AASKAII). 2026. arXiv search: Report number AASKAII/Chhetri01

    work page 2026

  13. [13]

    W. A. Coles et al. , 717 0 (2): 0 1206--1221, July 2010. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/717/2/1206

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/717/2/1206 2010

  14. [14]

    J. J. Condon and S. M. Ransom . Essential Radio Astronomy . Princeton University Press, 2016

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    J. M. Cordes , B. J. Rickett , D. R. Stinebring , and W. A. Coles . , 637 0 (1): 0 346--365, January 2006. doi:10.1086/498332

    work page doi:10.1086/498332 2006

  16. [16]

    T. J. Cornwell , K. R. Anantharamaiah , and R. Narayan . Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 6: 0 977--986, July 1989. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.6.000977

    work page doi:10.1364/josaa.6.000977 1989

  17. [17]

    W. M. Cronyn . , 174: 0 181, May 1972. doi:10.1086/151480

    work page doi:10.1086/151480 1972

  18. [18]

    K. Davies. Ionospheric Radio. The Institution of Engineering and Technology, 1990. doi:10.1049/PBEW031E

    work page doi:10.1049/pbew031e 1990

  19. [19]

    P. A. Dennison and A. Hewish . , 213 0 (5074): 0 343--346, January 1967. doi:10.1038/213343a0

    work page doi:10.1038/213343a0 1967

  20. [20]

    K. B. Deshpande and M. D. Zettergren . , 46 0 (9): 0 4564--4572, May 2019. doi:10.1029/2019GL082576

    work page doi:10.1029/2019gl082576 2019

  21. [21]

    K. B. Deshpande et al. Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 119 0 (5): 0 4026--4043, May 2014. doi:10.1002/2013JA019699

    work page doi:10.1002/2013ja019699 2014

  22. [22]

    K. B. Deshpande et al. Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 121 0 (9): 0 9188--9203, September 2016. doi:10.1002/2016JA022943

    work page doi:10.1002/2016ja022943 2016

  23. [23]

    W. C. Erickson . In N. Kassim , M. Perez , W. Junor , and P. Henning , editors, From Clark Lake to the Long Wavelength Array: Bill Erickson's Radio Science, volume 345 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, page 317, December 2005

    work page 2005

  24. [24]

    R. A. Fallows et al. Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 119 0 (12): 0 10,544--10,560, December 2014. doi:10.1002/2014JA020406

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1002/2014ja020406 2014

  25. [25]

    R. A. Fallows et al. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 10: 0 10, February 2020. doi:10.1051/swsc/2020010

    work page doi:10.1051/swsc/2020010 2020

  26. [26]

    R. A. Fallows et al. Advances in Space Research, 72 0 (12): 0 5311--5327, December 2023. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2022.08.076

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2022.08.076 2023

  27. [27]

    Flisek et al

    P. Flisek et al. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 13: 0 27, 2023

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    B. Forte. Radio Science, 43 0 (02): 0 1--9, 2008

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    B. Forte. Radio Science, 47 0 (04): 0 1--12, 2012

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    Forte et al

    B. Forte et al. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 263 0 (2): 0 36, 2022

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Gasperin de Gasperin et al

    F. Gasperin de Gasperin et al. , 615: 0 A179, August 2018. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833012

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833012 2018

  32. [32]

    Ghidoni et al

    R. Ghidoni et al. Submitted, 2025. doi:10.22541/essoar.176169469.93512147/v1

    work page doi:10.22541/essoar.176169469.93512147/v1 2025

  33. [33]

    Ghidoni et al

    R. Ghidoni et al. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, October 2025. doi:10.1051/swsc/2025052

    work page doi:10.1051/swsc/2025052 2025

  34. [34]

    W. M. Goss , C. Hooker , and R. D. Ekers . Pawsey, Joseph Lade . In Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers, page 60. Springer International Publishing, 2023. doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-0738-1_101004-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-0738-1_101004-1 2023

  35. [35]

    R. R. Grall et al. , 379 0 (6564): 0 429--432, February 1996. doi:10.1038/379429a0

    work page doi:10.1038/379429a0 1996

  36. [36]

    J. K. Harmon and W. A. Coles . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 110 0 (A3): 0 A03101, March 2005. doi:10.1029/2004JA010834

    work page doi:10.1029/2004ja010834 2005

  37. [37]

    J. F. Helmboldt and N. Hurley-Walker . Radio Science, 55 0 (10): 0 e07106, October 2020. doi:10.1029/2020RS007106

    work page doi:10.1029/2020rs007106 2020

  38. [38]

    Horv \'a th et al

    C. Horv \'a th et al. , 42: 0 e129, September 2025. doi:10.1017/pasa.2025.10093

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2025.10093 2025

  39. [39]

    Ishii et al

    M. Ishii et al. Advances in Space Research, 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    D. L. Jauncey et al. In H. Hirabayashi , P. G. Edwards , and D. W. Murphy , editors, Astrophysical Phenomena Revealed by Space VLBI, pages 147--150, April 2000

    work page 2000

  41. [41]

    C. H. Jordan et al. , 471 0 (4): 0 3974--3987, November 2017. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1797

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1797 2017

  42. [42]

    M. C. Kelley. The Earth's ionosphere: Plasma physics and electrodynamics, volume 96. Academic press, 2009

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    M. M. Komesaroff . Australian Journal of Physics, 13: 0 153, June 1960. doi:10.1071/PH600153

    work page doi:10.1071/ph600153 1960

  44. [44]

    L. V. E. Koopmans . , 718 0 (2): 0 963--971, August 2010. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/963

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/718/2/963 2010

  45. [45]

    F. P. Lanter , A. Sutinjo , and J. Morgan . Advances in Space Research, 72 0 (12): 0 5503--5519, December 2023. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2022.12.036

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2022.12.036 2023

  46. [46]

    Lenc et al

    E. Lenc et al. , 34: 0 e040, September 2017. doi:10.1017/pasa.2017.36

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1017/pasa.2017.36 2017

  47. [47]

    L. T. Little and R. D. Ekers . , 10: 0 306, January 1971

    work page 1971

  48. [48]

    H. Lloyd. The Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy, 17: 0 171--177, 1831. ISSN 07908113. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/30078788

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    S. T. Loi et al. , 453 0 (3): 0 2731--2746, November 2015 a . doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1808

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1808 2015

  50. [50]

    S. T. Loi et al. , 42 0 (10): 0 3707--3714, May 2015 b . doi:10.1002/2015GL063699

    work page doi:10.1002/2015gl063699 2015

  51. [51]

    S. T. Loi et al. Radio Science, 50 0 (7): 0 574--597, July 2015 c . doi:10.1002/2015RS005711

    work page doi:10.1002/2015rs005711 2015

  52. [52]

    S. T. Loi et al. Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 121 0 (2): 0 1569--1586, February 2016. doi:10.1002/2015JA022052

    work page doi:10.1002/2015ja022052 2016

  53. [53]

    Lonsdale

    C. Lonsdale. Calibration approaches. LFD Memo 15, MIT Haystack, 2004. URL ftp://gemini.haystack.edu/pub/lofar/015.pdf

    work page 2004

  54. [54]

    Materassi, B

    M. Materassi, B. Forte, A. J. Coster, and S. Skone. The dynamical ionosphere: A systems approach to ionospheric irregularity. Elsevier, 2019

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    McKay-Bukowski et al

    D. McKay-Bukowski et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53 0 (3): 0 1440--1451, March 2015. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2014.2342252

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2014.2342252 2015

  56. [56]

    Mevius et al

    M. Mevius et al. Radio Science, 51 0 (7): 0 927--941, July 2016. doi:10.1002/2016RS006028

    work page doi:10.1002/2016rs006028 2016

  57. [57]

    D. A. Mitchell et al. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2 0 (5): 0 707--717, November 2008. doi:10.1109/JSTSP.2008.2005327

    work page doi:10.1109/jstsp.2008.2005327 2008

  58. [58]

    Molera Calv \'e s et al

    G. Molera Calv \'e s et al. , 564: 0 A4, April 2014. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322925

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322925 2014

  59. [59]

    R. Narayan . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 341 0 (1660): 0 151--165, October 1992. doi:10.1098/rsta.1992.0090

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.1992.0090 1992

  60. [60]

    Osborn and M

    J. Osborn and M. Sarazin . , 480 0 (1): 0 1278--1299, October 2018. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1898 2018

  61. [61]

    Payne-Scott and L

    R. Payne-Scott and L. L. McCready . Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity, 53 0 (4): 0 429--432, January 1948. doi:10.1029/TE053i004p00429

    work page doi:10.1029/te053i004p00429 1948

  62. [62]

    Petrov , Y

    L. Petrov , Y. Y. Kovalev , E. B. Fomalont , and D. Gordon . , 142 0 (2): 0 35, August 2011. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/2/35

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/2/35 2011

  63. [63]

    J. A. Ratcliffe and J. L. Pawsey . Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 29 0 (2): 0 301, January 1933. doi:10.1017/S0305004100011117

    work page doi:10.1017/s0305004100011117 1933

  64. [64]

    D. J. Reardon et al. , 904 0 (2): 0 104, December 2020. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbd40

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbd40 2020

  65. [65]

    M. J. Rioja and R. Dodson . Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 8: 0 011012, January 2022. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.8.1.011012

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.8.1.011012 2022

  66. [66]

    M. J. Rioja , R. Dodson , and T. M. O. Franzen . , 478 0 (2): 0 2337--2349, August 2018. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1195

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1195 2018

  67. [67]

    Sekido , T

    M. Sekido , T. Kondo , E. Kawai , and M. Imae . Radio Science, 38 0 (4): 0 1069, July 2003. doi:10.1029/2000RS002620

    work page doi:10.1029/2000rs002620 2003

  68. [68]

    F. G. Smith . Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 2 0 (6): 0 350--355, January 1952. doi:10.1016/0021-9169(52)90075-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0021-9169(52)90075-5 1952

  69. [69]

    M. Spencer . Proceedings of the Physical Society B, 68 0 (8): 0 493--503, August 1955. doi:10.1088/0370-1301/68/8/302

    work page doi:10.1088/0370-1301/68/8/302 1955

  70. [70]

    A. R. Thompson , J. M. Moran , and G. W. Swenson , Jr. Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy, 3rd Edition . Springer International Publishing, 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44431-4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44431-4 2017

  71. [71]

    Tsagouri et al

    I. Tsagouri et al. Advances in Space Research, 2023. ISSN 0273-1177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.07.024. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117723005598

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2023.07.024 2023

  72. [72]

    B. J. Uscinski . Elements of Wave Propagation in Random Media . McGraw-Hill , 1977. ISBN 9780070666504

    work page 1977

  73. [73]

    Waszewski , J

    A. Waszewski , J. Morgan , and C. H. Jordan . , 39: 0 e036, September 2022. doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.33

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.33 2022

  74. [74]

    A. D. Wheelon. Electromagnetic Scintillation : Volume 2: Weak Scattering , volume 2. Cambridge University Press, 2003. ISBN 978-0-521-80199-7. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511534812

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511534812 2003

  75. [75]

    Wijnholds , S

    S. Wijnholds , S. van der Tol , R. Nijboer , and A.-J. van der Veen . IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 27 0 (1): 0 30--42, January 2010. doi:10.1109/MSP.2009.934853

    work page doi:10.1109/msp.2009.934853 2010

  76. [76]

    Yoshiura et al

    S. Yoshiura et al. , 77 0 (3): 0 556--561, June 2025. doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf024

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf024 2025

  77. [77]

    Zettergren and J

    M. Zettergren and J. Semeter . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 117 0 (A6): 0 A06306, June 2012. doi:10.1029/2012JA017637

    work page doi:10.1029/2012ja017637 2012