Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 59 references

Bidirectional low-noise frequency conversion distributes entanglement between a single atom and a near-visible photon over 24 km of deployed commercial fiber while cutting fidelity by less than 1%.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 06:10 UTC pith:7VQVILB2

load-bearing objection Solid first demonstration of bidirectional QFC that keeps atom-photon entanglement intact over real 24 km metro fiber; rate is low but the fidelity claim holds.

arxiv 2607.08513 v1 pith:7VQVILB2 submitted 2026-07-09 quant-ph

Metropolitan entanglement distribution between an atom and a near-visible photon

Maya B\"uki , Pooja Malik , Florian Fertig , Tobias Frank , Marvin Scholz , Tommy Block , Gianvito Chiarella , Yiru Zhou
show 4 more authors
Emanuele Distante Pau Farrera Gerhard Rempe Harald Weinfurter
This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords quantum networksatom-photon entanglementquantum frequency conversiontelecom fibermetropolitan quantum linkrubidiumpolarization qubits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Advanced atomic quantum nodes emit light near 780 nm, but long-haul fiber works well only in the telecom band. This paper shows that two custom quantum frequency converters can move an atom-entangled photon into the telecom S-band, send it across 24 km of real metropolitan fiber, and convert it back to 780 nm without destroying the entanglement. The full link transfers photons with 1.7% efficiency and reduces the atom-photon fidelity by less than one percent relative to the local state; a Bell inequality is still violated after the round trip. The result matters because it shows that existing fiber infrastructure can be used to connect atomic network nodes that themselves never operate at telecom wavelengths.

Core claim

Using two polarization-preserving quantum frequency converters, the authors distribute entanglement between a single rubidium atom and a photon that is converted from 780 nm to 1514 nm, travels 24 km of deployed commercial fiber, and is converted back to 780 nm, achieving 1.7% photon transfer efficiency while lowering the atom-photon entanglement fidelity by less than 1% (F ≥ 86.9 ± 1.5% after the full link).

What carries the argument

Two low-noise, polarization-preserving quantum frequency converters (difference- and sum-frequency generation in PPLN waveguides inside Sagnac loops) that map 780 nm ↔ 1514 nm, plus narrowband filtering and active fiber-polarization stabilization.

Load-bearing premise

The fidelity lower bound assumes residual noise after filtering is completely unpolarized white noise; if that noise is polarized or correlated, the true fidelity is lower than the number reported.

What would settle it

Reconstruct the full atom-photon density matrix after the complete link (not only two-basis visibilities) and check whether the fidelity falls below the white-noise bound or the Bell violation disappears when the detection window or converter pump powers are changed to alter the noise spectrum.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Atomic quantum nodes can be integrated with existing long-distance fiber networks without new dedicated infrastructure.
  • The final near-visible photon can be mapped onto a second atomic node or fed into nondestructive photonic qubit detectors.
  • The same architecture supports hybrid fiber-plus-free-space links because the back-converted wavelength matches low-loss atmospheric windows.
  • Cavity coupling or multiplexed atomic arrays would raise entanglement rates by more than two orders of magnitude while improving signal-to-noise.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Continuous multi-basis tomography under the same pump and filter settings would reveal how much of the reported fidelity margin is an artifact of the white-noise assumption.
  • The eight-minute polarization recalibration cycle implies that longer or thermally less stable links will need either faster active feedback or polarization-insensitive encoding to stay practical.
  • Once rates rise via cavity arrays, the same bidirectional converters become a natural interface between atomic processors and existing telecom quantum-key-distribution hardware.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports distribution of entanglement between a single 87Rb atom and a photonic qubit over a 24 km deployed commercial fiber (14 km line-of-sight) connecting LMU Munich and MPQ Garching. The atom is entangled with a 780 nm photon (Eq. 1), which is converted to the telecom S-band (1514 nm) via difference-frequency generation, transmitted through the fiber, and back-converted to 780 nm via sum-frequency generation. Polarization-preserving Sagnac-based QFCs, narrowband filtering, and automated polarization stabilization every 8 min are used. Intermediate telecom correlations (Fig. 3) give average visibility 82.4 ± 0.8% (F ≥ 86.8 ± 0.6%, S = 2.30 ± 0.08); after full bidirectional conversion (Fig. 4) the values remain essentially unchanged (V̄ = 82.5 ± 2.0%, F ≥ 86.9 ± 1.5%, S = 2.29 ± 0.08). Photon transfer efficiency of the link is 1.7% and the fidelity impact of conversion plus fiber is stated to be <1%. Noise and pump-power trade-offs are characterized (Fig. 2), and an error budget attributes the dominant imperfections to atomic operations rather than the link.

Significance. Bidirectional quantum frequency conversion that returns a telecom photon to a near-visible wavelength while preserving high-fidelity atom–photon entanglement over a real metropolitan fiber is a concrete step toward modular quantum networks. Most advanced atomic and solid-state nodes operate outside the telecom band; a low-noise, polarization-preserving round-trip converter therefore enables integration with existing fiber infrastructure without sacrificing subsequent free-space, cavity, or nondestructive-detection operations. The work supplies quantitative efficiencies, SNR, Bell violations, and an explicit noise budget on deployed fiber, making the result directly usable by the community. Strengths include intermediate (telecom-only) and final (back-converted) data sets that both violate Bell inequalities by >3σ, a transparent pump-power/SNR characterization, and a clear separation of atomic versus link error sources.

minor comments (5)
  1. Eq. (2) and surrounding text: the white-noise assumption underlying the fidelity bound F ≥ 1/4 + 3/4 V̄ is standard but should be stated more explicitly as an assumption; a one-sentence note that residual noise after filtering is treated as white (and that SNR = 47 ± 8 implies only marginal fidelity reduction) would remove any ambiguity.
  2. Fig. 2 caption and main text: the solid-line fits are said to use equations given in the Supplemental Material; a brief indication of the functional form (or a reference to the relevant SM equation numbers) in the main text would improve readability for readers who do not immediately consult the SM.
  3. Page 4, efficiency paragraph: the overall entanglement-distribution efficiency 3.1 × 10^{-5} is broken down into collection (1%), link (1.7%), and detection (18%) factors; stating the absolute event rates used for the two data sets (already given later) next to this breakdown would make the rate comparison more immediate.
  4. Typographical consistency: “florescence” should be “fluorescence”; “Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Schellingstraße. 4” contains a stray period; a few author-affiliation accents are inconsistently rendered.
  5. References: several recent metropolitan-scale ion-photon and memory-memory entanglement works are cited; ensuring that the most closely related bidirectional-QFC or free-space-compatible conversion papers are also present would strengthen the literature context.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental correlations and efficiencies are measured directly; fidelity bound is a standard inequality applied to data, not a self-referential derivation.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental demonstration of bidirectional quantum frequency conversion for atom-photon entanglement over 24 km of deployed fiber. Load-bearing quantities (external conversion efficiencies, noise rates, SNR, atom-photon redetection fringes, visibilities V_HV and V_DA, Bell parameter S, and the 1.7% link efficiency) are obtained from direct measurements on the physical apparatus, not from a theoretical derivation that reuses its own inputs. The only modeling step is the standard white-noise fidelity lower bound F ≥ 1/4 + 3/4 V̄ applied to measured average visibility; that inequality is not fitted to the present data set, does not redefine the measured visibilities, and is not justified by a self-citation uniqueness claim. Self-citations ([19], [20], [34], [47]) supply prior apparatus baselines (QFC design, atomic mapping, 0 km reference fidelity) that are independently falsifiable and are not used to force the metropolitan-link result. Polarization stabilization every 8 min and the near-identical 0 km vs 24 km fidelity bounds further show that the central claim rests on new correlation data rather than on a closed definitional loop. No self-definitional step, fitted-input-as-prediction, load-bearing self-citation chain, imported uniqueness theorem, smuggled ansatz, or renaming of a known result is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental paper; load-bearing content is measured data plus standard quantum-information inequalities. Free parameters are operational choices (pump powers, detection window) optimized for SNR. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • QFC1 pump power = 400 mW
    Set to 400 mW after measuring efficiency-vs-noise curve to maximize SNR while remaining near peak conversion efficiency.
  • QFC2 pump power = 300 mW
    Set to 300 mW as a deliberate trade-off because noise rises super-linearly with pump power in the up-conversion stage.
  • photon detection window = 60 ns
    Fixed 60 ns temporal gate chosen to raise SNR to 47 ± 8.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Fidelity of a two-qubit state is bounded from below by F ≥ 1/4 + 3/4 V̄ when noise is white (Eq. 2).
    Standard relation used throughout atomic-entanglement literature; invoked to convert measured average visibility into a fidelity lower bound.
  • standard math Bell parameter S > 2 certifies entanglement (CHSH inequality).
    Used to claim non-classical correlations after both the telecom and the back-converted stages.
  • domain assumption Polarization drifts in the underground fiber are slow enough to be corrected every 8 min by classical light and a gradient-descent piezo controller.
    Stated as an experimental fact that enables long integration times; if drifts were faster the reported visibilities would collapse.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 16593 in / 2231 out tokens · 26375 ms · 2026-07-10T06:10:08.382445+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Entanglement distribution is the overarching purpose of quantum networks. While communication over long distances can use deployed fiber infrastructure, it requires photons in the telecom band. However, advanced quantum network nodes do not operate at such wavelengths. Here we overcome this limitation with two tailor-made low-noise quantum-frequency converters to distribute entanglement between a single atom and a resonant photon over 14km line-of-sight via 24km of a deployed commercial fiber. The photon at wavelength 780nm is first entangled with the atom, then converted to the telecom S-band, and finally back-converted after propagation through the fiber. This link enables a photon transfer efficiency of 1.7% while affecting the atom-photon entanglement fidelity by less than 1%. This brings integration of atomic quantum nodes with existing long-distance fiber networks into reach, enabling novel applications in quantum information processing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08513 by Emanuele Distante, Florian Fertig, Gerhard Rempe, Gianvito Chiarella, Harald Weinfurter, Marvin Scholz, Maya B\"uki, Pau Farrera, Pooja Malik, Tobias Frank, Tommy Block, Yiru Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Metropolitan quantum link. Two laboratories in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Characterization of the QFCs. Measurement of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Atom-photon state correlation at 780 nm after 24 km [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, H. J. Kimble, and H. Mabuchi, Quantum State Transfer and Entanglement Distribution among Distant Nodes in a Quantum Network, Physical Review Letters78, 3221 (1997)

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum in- ternet: A vision for the road ahead, Science362, 10.1126/science.aam9288 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aam9288 2018

  4. [4]

    Briegel, W

    H.-J. Briegel, W. D¨ ur, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication, Physical Review Letters81, 5932 (1998)

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    Azuma, S

    K. Azuma, S. E. Economou, D. Elkouss, P. Hilaire, L. Jiang, H.-K. Lo, and I. Tzitrin, Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet, Re- views of Modern Physics95, 045006 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    D. Main, P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger, E. M. Ainley, A. Agrawal, B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, G. Araneda, and D. M. Lucas, Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link, Nature638, 383 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Zhang and Q

    Z. Zhang and Q. Zhuang, Distributed quantum sensing, Quantum Science and Technology6, 043001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, D. P. Nadlinger, P. Drmota, D. Main, G. Araneda, C. J. Ballance, and D. M. Lu- cas, An elementary quantum network of entangled opti- cal atomic clocks, Nature609, 689 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Novikov, J

    V. Novikov, J. Jia, T. B. Brasil, A. Grimaldi, M. Bo- coum, M. Balabas, J. H. M¨ uller, E. Zeuthen, and E. S. Polzik, Hybrid quantum network for sensing in the acous- tic frequency range, Nature643, 955 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Gottesman, T

    D. Gottesman, T. Jennewein, and S. Croke, Longer- Baseline Telescopes Using Quantum Repeaters, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 70503 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Bussi` eres, N

    F. Bussi` eres, N. Sangouard, M. Afzelius, H. de Riedmat- ten, C. Simon, and W. Tittel, Prospective applications of optical quantum memories, Journal of Modern Optics 60, 1519 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    S. Wei, B. Jing, X. Zhang, J. Liao, C. Yuan, B. Fan, C. Lyu, D. Zhou, Y. Wang, G. Deng, H. Song, D. Oblak, G. Guo, and Q. Zhou, Towards Real-World Quantum Networks: A Review, Laser and Photonics Reviews16, 6 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    B. B. Blinov, D. L. Moehring, L.-M. Duan, and C. Mon- roe, Observation of entanglement between a single trapped atom and a single photon, Nature428, 153 (2004)

    work page 2004

  14. [14]

    J. Volz, M. Weber, D. Schlenk, W. Rosenfeld, J. Vrana, K. Saucke, C. Kurtsiefer, and H. Weinfurter, Observation of entanglement of a single photon with a trapped atom, Physical Review Letters96, 1 (2006)

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    D. L. Moehring, P. Maunz, S. Olmschenk, K. C. Younge, D. N. Matsukevich, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, En- tanglement of single-atom quantum bits at a distance, Nature449, 68 (2007)

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    T. Wilk, S. C. Webster, A. Kuhn, and G. Rempe, Single- Atom Single-Photon Quantum Interface, Science317, 488 (2007)

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    Ritter, C

    S. Ritter, C. N¨ olleke, C. Hahn, A. Reiserer, A. Neuzner, M. Uphoff, M. M¨ ucke, E. Figueroa, J. Bochmann, and G. Rempe, An elementary quantum network of single atoms in optical cavities, Nature484, 195 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Chang, C

    W. Chang, C. Li, Y. K. Wu, N. Jiang, S. Zhang, Y. F. Pu, X. Y. Chang, and L. M. Duan, Long-Distance Entan- glement between a Multiplexed Quantum Memory and a Telecom Photon, Physical Review X9, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Van Leent, M

    T. Van Leent, M. Bock, R. Garthoff, K. Redeker, W. Zhang, T. Bauer, W. Rosenfeld, C. Becher, and H. Weinfurter, Long-Distance Distribution of Atom- Photon Entanglement at Telecom Wavelength, Physical Review Letters124, 10510 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Y. Zhou, P. Malik, F. Fertig, M. Bock, T. Bauer, T. van Leent, W. Zhang, C. Becher, and H. Weinfurter, Long- Lived Quantum Memory Enabling Atom-Photon Entan- glement over 101 km of Telecom Fiber, PRX Quantum 5, 020307 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Krutyanskiy, M

    V. Krutyanskiy, M. Canteri, M. Meraner, V. Krcmarsky, and B. Lanyon, Multimode Ion-Photon Entanglement over 101 Kilometers, PRX Quantum5, 020308 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Cui, Z.-Q

    Z.-B. Cui, Z.-Q. Wang, P.-C. Lai, Y. Wang, J.-X. Shi, P.-Y. Liu, Y.-D. Sun, Z.-C. Tian, Y.-B. Liang, B.-X. Qi, Y.-Y. Huang, Z.-C. Zhou, Y.-K. Wu, Y. Xu, L.- M. Duan, and Y.-F. Pu, Metropolitan-scale ion-photon entanglement via a quantum network node with hy- brid multiplexing enhancements, Nature Communica- tions 10.1038/s41467-025-67311-5 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-67311-5 2025

  23. [23]

    Wang, R.-H

    T.-Y. Wang, R.-H. Chen, Y. Li, Z.-H. Shen, X.-S. Fan, Z.-B. Ju, T.-C. Tang, X.-W. Li, J.-Y. Peng, Z.-Y. Zhou, W. Zhang, G.-C. Guo, and B.-S. Shi, Long-distance distribution of atom-photon entanglement based on a cavity-free cold atomic ensemble, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 050801 (2026)

    work page 2026

  24. [24]

    J. V. Rakonjac, S. Grandi, S. Wengerowsky, D. Lago- Rivera, F. Appas, and H. de Riedmatten, Transmission of light–matter entanglement over a metropolitan network, Optica Quantum1, 94 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    C. M. Knaut, A. Suleymanzade, Y.-C. Wei, D. R. As- sumpcao, P.-J. Stas, Y. Q. Huan, B. Machielse, E. N. Knall, M. Sutula, G. Baranes, N. Sinclair, C. De- Eknamkul, D. S. Levonian, M. K. Bhaskar, H. Park, M. Lonˇ car, and M. D. Lukin, Entanglement of nanopho- tonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network, Na- ture629, 573 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Kucera, C

    S. Kucera, C. Haen, E. Arensk¨ otter, T. Bauer, J. Meiers, M. Sch¨ afer, R. Boland, M. Yahyapour, M. Lessing, R. Holzwarth, C. Becher, and J. Eschner, Demonstra- tion of quantum network protocols over a 14-km urban fiber link, npj Quantum Information10, 88 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    van Leent, M

    T. van Leent, M. Bock, F. Fertig, R. Garthoff, S. Eppelt, Y. Zhou, P. Malik, M. Seubert, T. Bauer, W. Rosen- feld, W. Zhang, C. Becher, and H. Weinfurter, Entan- gling single atoms over 33 km telecom fibre, Nature607, 69 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    J. L. Liu, X. Y. Luo, Y. Yu, C. Y. Wang, B. Wang, Y. Hu, J. Li, M. Y. Zheng, B. Yao, Z. Yan, D. Teng, J. W. Jiang, X. B. Liu, X. P. Xie, J. Zhang, Q. H. Mao, X. Jiang, Q. Zhang, X. H. Bao, and J. W. Pan, Creation of mem- ory–memory entanglement in a metropolitan quantum network, Nature629, 579 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    A. J. Stolk, K. L. van der Enden, M. C. Slater, I. te Raa- Derckx, P. Botma, J. van Rantwijk, J. J. Biemond, R. A. J. Hagen, R. W. Herfst, W. D. Koek, A. J. H. Meskers, R. Vollmer, E. J. van Zwet, M. Markham, A. M. Edmonds, J. F. Geus, F. Elsen, B. Jungbluth, C. Haefner, C. Tresp, J. Stuhler, S. Ritter, and R. Han- son, Metropolitan-scale heralded entangl...

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    X.-Y. Luo, Y. Yu, J.-L. Liu, M.-Y. Zheng, C.-Y. Wang, B. Wang, J. Li, X. Jiang, X.-P. Xie, Q. Zhang, X.-H. Bao, and J.-W. Pan, Postselected Entanglement between Two Atomic Ensembles Separated by 12.5 km, Physical Review Letters129, 050503 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Tanzilli, W

    S. Tanzilli, W. Tittel, M. Halder, O. Alibart, P. Baldi, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden, A photonic quantum informa- tion interface, Nature437, 116 (2005)

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    Ramelow, A

    S. Ramelow, A. Fedrizzi, A. Poppe, N. K. Langford, and A. Zeilinger, Polarization-entanglement-conserving frequency conversion of photons, Physical Review A85, 013845 (2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Albrecht, P

    B. Albrecht, P. Farrera, X. Fernandez-Gonzalvo, M. Cris- tiani, and H. de Riedmatten, A waveguide frequency con- verter connecting rubidium-based quantum memories to the telecom C-band, Nature Communications5, 3376 (2014)

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Ikuta, T

    R. Ikuta, T. Kobayashi, T. Kawakami, S. Miki, M. Yabuno, T. Yamashita, H. Terai, M. Koashi, T. Mukai, T. Yamamoto, and N. Imoto, Polarization in- sensitive frequency conversion for an atom-photon en- tanglement distribution via a telecom network, Nature Communications9, 1997 (2018)

    work page 1997

  35. [35]

    Niemietz, P

    D. Niemietz, P. Farrera, S. Langenfeld, and G. Rempe, Nondestructive detection of photonic qubits, Nature591, 570 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    S. K. Liao, W. Q. Cai, W. Y. Liu, L. Zhang, Y. Li, J. G. Ren, J. Yin, Q. Shen, Y. Cao, Z. P. Li, F. Z. Li, X. W. Chen, L. H. Sun, J. J. Jia, J. C. Wu, X. J. Jiang, J. F. Wang, Y. M. Huang, Q. Wang, Y. L. Zhou, L. Deng, T. Xi, L. Ma, T. Hu, Q. Zhang, Y. A. Chen, N. L. Liu, X. B. Wang, Z. C. Zhu, C. Y. Lu, R. Shu, C. Z. Peng, J. Y. Wang, and J. W. Pan, Sate...

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Maring, P

    N. Maring, P. Farrera, K. Kutluer, M. Mazzera, G. Heinze, and H. de Riedmatten, Photonic quantum state transfer between a cold atomic gas and a crystal, Nature551, 485 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    J. D. Siverns, J. Hannegan, and Q. Quraishi, Demonstra- tion of slow light in rubidium vapor using single photons from a trapped ion, Science Advances5, eaav4651 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    K¨ orber, O

    M. K¨ orber, O. Morin, S. Langenfeld, A. Neuzner, S. Rit- ter, and G. Rempe, Decoherence-protected memory for a 7 single-photon qubit, Nature Photonics12, 18 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Thomas, L

    P. Thomas, L. Ruscio, O. Morin, and G. Rempe, Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom, Nature608, 677 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Thomas, L

    P. Thomas, L. Ruscio, O. Morin, and G. Rempe, Fusion of deterministically generated photonic graph states, Na- ture629, 567 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Chiarella, T

    G. Chiarella, T. Frank, L. Zuka, P. Farrera, and G. Rempe, Source of Heralded Atom-Photon Entangle- ment for Quantum Networking, Physical Review Letters 135, 240802 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Reiserer and G

    A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum net- works with single atoms and optical photons, Reviews of Modern Physics87, 1379 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Canteri, Z

    M. Canteri, Z. X. Koong, J. Bate, A. Winkler, V. Krutyanskiy, and B. P. Lanyon, Photon-Interfaced Ten-Qubit Register of Trapped Ions, Physical Review Letters135, 80801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    J. P. Covey, H. Weinfurter, and H. Bernien, Quantum networks with neutral atom processing nodes, npj Quan- tum Information9, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    See Supplemental Material for additional information about the entanglement generation and readout pro- cesses, the experimental setup, the entenglement fidelity measurements, and the quantum frequency conversion noise

    work page

  48. [48]

    Bersin, M

    E. Bersin, M. Sutula, Y. Q. Huan, A. Suleymanzade, D. R. Assumpcao, Y. C. Wei, P. J. Stas, C. M. Knaut, E. N. Knall, C. Langrock, N. Sinclair, R. Murphy, R. Riedinger, M. Yeh, C. J. Xin, S. Bandyopadhyay, D. D. Sukachev, B. Machielse, D. S. Levonian, M. K. Bhaskar, S. Hamilton, H. Park, M. Lonˇ car, M. M. Fejer, P. B. Dixon, D. R. Englund, and M. D. Lukin...

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Maring, D

    N. Maring, D. Lago-Rivera, A. Lenhard, G. Heinze, and H. de Riedmatten, Quantum frequency conversion of memory-compatible single photons from 606 nm to the telecom C-band, Optica5, 507 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    C. A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, B. E. King, C. Langer, V. Meyer, C. J. Myatt, M. Rowe, Q. A. Turchette, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland, and C. Monroe, Experimental en- tanglement of four particles, Nature404, 256 (2000)

    work page 2000

  51. [51]

    Hartung, M

    L. Hartung, M. Seubert, S. Welte, E. Distante, and G. Rempe, A quantum-network register assembled with optical tweezers in an optical cavity, Science385, 179 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    P. S. Kuo, J. S. Pelc, C. Langrock, and M. M. Fejer, Us- ing Temperature to Reduce Noise in Quantum Frequency Conversion, 2018 Conference on Lasers and Electro- Optics, CLEO 2018 - Proceedings43, 2034 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    Sch¨ afer, B

    M. Sch¨ afer, B. Kambs, D. Herrmann, T. Bauer, and C. Becher, Two-Stage, Low Noise Quantum Frequency Conversion of Single Photons from Silicon-Vacancy Centers in Diamond to the Telecom C-Band, Advanced Quantum Technologies8, 10.1002/qute.202300228 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.202300228 2025

  54. [54]

    Brekenfeld, D

    M. Brekenfeld, D. Niemietz, J. D. Christesen, and G. Rempe, A quantum network node with crossed op- tical fibre cavities, Nature Physics16, 647 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    Pironio, A

    S. Pironio, A. Ac´ ın, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, S. Massar, and V. Scarani, Device-independent quantum key distri- bution secure against collective attacks, New Journal of Physics11, 045021 (2009)

    work page 2009

  56. [56]

    Langenfeld, P

    S. Langenfeld, P. Thomas, O. Morin, and G. Rempe, Quantum Repeater Node Demonstrating Uncondition- ally Secure Key Distribution, Physical Review Letters 126, 230506 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Langenfeld, S

    S. Langenfeld, S. Welte, L. Hartung, S. Daiss, P. Thomas, O. Morin, E. Distante, and G. Rempe, Quantum telepor- tation between remote qubit memories with only a sin- gle photon as a resource, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 130502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    Abasifard, C

    M. Abasifard, C. Cholsuk, R. G. Pousa, A. Kumar, A. Zand, T. Riel, D. K. L. Oi, and T. Vogl, The ideal wavelength for daylight free-space quantum key distribu- tion, APL Quantum1, 10.1063/5.0186767 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0186767 2024

  59. [59]

    B¨ uki and P

    M. B¨ uki and P. Malik, Data: Metropolitan entanglement distribution between an atom and a near-visible photon, 10.5281/zenodo.18481790 (2026)

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.18481790 2026