Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 39 references

Dimensional Regularisation with Non-Anticommuting $\gamma_5$: Status and Application to the Standard Model

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read BMHV scheme delivers complete one-loop Standard Model renormalisation with finite symmetry-restoring counterterms, and multi-loop work shows renormalisability.

desk verdict Solid status report that actually delivers the first full 1-loop SM BMHV counterterms (divergent + finite) in Rξ gauge plus 4-loop Abelian saturation; proceedings format is the only real soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08847 v1 pith:PZPWCT7J submitted 2026-07-09 hep-ph hep-th

Matthias Wei{ss}wange This is my paper
classification hep-phhep-th
keywords dimensionalregularisationgamma-5BMHVschemesymmetry-restoringcountertermsStandardModelrenormalisationSlavnov-Tayloridentitychiralgaugetheoriesmulti-loop
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

High-precision electroweak calculations need a consistent treatment of the matrix gamma-5 inside dimensional regularisation. The only all-order consistent choice keeps gamma-5 strictly four-dimensional, but that choice breaks gauge and BRST invariance at the regularised level. This paper reports the status of restoring those symmetries by local counterterms. It shows that the number of allowed local operators saturates at four loops in an Abelian chiral theory, so the theory remains renormalisable. The same framework is then applied to the full Standard Model at one loop, producing both the divergent counterterms and the finite symmetry-restoring counterterms for a two-parameter family of evanescent gauge interactions. A sympathetic reader cares because these counterterms are a prerequisite for reliable two-loop electroweak precision work and because the multi-loop results give concrete evidence that the scheme does not proliferate uncontrollably.

What carries the argument

The regularised quantum action principle, which expresses the entire symmetry violation as a single local composite-operator insertion Delta equal to the D-dimensional Slavnov-Taylor operator acting on the classical plus counterterm action; the finite and divergent counterterms are then fixed by requiring that this insertion vanishes in the physical four-dimensional limit.

What would settle it

An explicit two-loop calculation of a Slavnov-Taylor identity for a non-Abelian chiral theory that cannot be restored by any local counterterm of the form predicted by power counting would falsify the claim that the scheme remains renormalisable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The BMHV scheme applied to the Standard Model yields a complete set of one-loop divergent and finite symmetry-restoring counterterms; at the same time, explicit three- and four-loop calculations in an Abelian chiral gauge theory show that the basis of local operators that can appear in the symmetry-breaking insertions remains finite, guaranteeing that the theory stays renormalisable order by order.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the assumption that the regularised quantum action principle still holds for the full non-Abelian Standard Model with the chosen D-dimensional fermion realisation and the two-parameter family of evanescent generators, so that a single local insertion completely captures every symmetry violation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The full set of one-loop divergent and finite counterterms is now available as input for two-loop electroweak precision calculations in the BMHV scheme.
  • The finite number of local operators observed up to four loops implies that no infinite tower of new symmetry-restoring counterterms appears at higher loops.
  • Different choices of the two evanescent parameters (purely four-dimensional versus fully D-dimensional photon and gluon currents) produce different intermediate counterterms but identical physical predictions once the limit is taken.
  • The same restoration procedure can be applied without modification to chiral effective field theories that contain the same non-anticommuting gamma-5.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the photon and gluon can be made fully D-dimensional while the weak currents cannot, pure QCD or QED sub-sectors remain simpler to renormalise than the full electroweak theory, suggesting staged calculations that first freeze the weak couplings.
  • The explicit saturation of the operator basis at four loops makes it plausible that an all-order algebraic proof of renormalisability in the BMHV scheme is now within reach for Abelian theories.
  • Once the two-loop SM counterterms are known, the same finite symmetry-restoring pieces can be recycled into SMEFT matching calculations that currently rely on less consistent gamma-5 treatments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This proceedings contribution summarises the authors’ programme on the Breitenlohner–Maison/’t Hooft–Veltman (BMHV) treatment of non-anticommuting γ5 in dimensional regularisation. It covers three strands: (i) the D-dimensional realisation of Dirac spinors and the freedom in evanescent gauge interactions; (ii) multi-loop renormalisation of a right-handed Abelian chiral gauge theory through four loops, establishing saturation of the local operator basis for both divergent and finite symmetry-restoring counterterms; and (iii) the complete one-loop renormalisation of the Standard Model in Rξ gauge, including divergent counterterms and finite symmetry-restoring counterterms. For the SM, a two-parameter family of evanescent generators (cQED, cQCD) is introduced, the tree-level BMHV breaking is derived explicitly, and a representative excerpt of one-loop finite counterterms (fermion kinetic terms, external sources) is given, with the full set deferred to a forthcoming publication.

Significance. If the reported results hold, the work supplies the highest-order BMHV applications to date (four-loop Abelian) and the first complete one-loop SM renormalisation in BMHV with Rξ gauge that includes both the full divergent counterterm set (a prerequisite for two-loop work) and finite symmetry-restoring counterterms. The multi-loop analysis demonstrates that power-counting and ghost-number constraints keep the operator basis finite, thereby supporting all-order renormalisability of the scheme. The systematic treatment of evanescent photon/gluon currents and the observation that the QCD sector cannot be decoupled from the symmetry-restoration procedure are practically useful for high-precision electroweak and SMEFT calculations. Strengths include the use of the regularised quantum action principle, cross-checks that extract the same non-symmetric divergent structures from ordinary and Δ-inserted Green functions, and an automated FORM-based pipeline.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim of a “complete 1-loop renormalisation of the SM” (abstract and §5) rests on the evaluation of 66 Green functions, yet only a small excerpt of finite coefficients appears (Sec. 5.3, App. C, Eqs. (34)–(36)). While the proceedings format and the pointer to the forthcoming full paper [10] make this understandable, the load-bearing technical content (full divergent and finite counterterm lists, dependence on cQED/cQCD across all sectors, and the explicit check that the same non-symmetric structures are recovered from both ordinary and Δ-inserted correlators) is not yet independently verifiable from the present manuscript. For archival purposes the authors should either expand the excerpt to cover at least one complete sector (e.g. the full gauge-boson two-point and three-point finite CTs) or state more precisely which coefficients are already fixed by the multi-loop Abelian
  2. Sec. 2, Eq. (3) and the subsequent SM application assume that the regularised quantum action principle continues to hold for the full non-Abelian SM with Option-1 Dirac spinors and the two-parameter family of evanescent generators (Eq. (10)). The multi-loop Abelian evidence (Sec. 4) and the locality of the tree-level SM breaking (Sec. 5.2, Eqs. (15)–(19), App. B) are supportive, but a short explicit statement of the residual assumptions (e.g. absence of non-local or non-power-counting-violating contributions once all SM fields and the chosen evanescent generators are present) would strengthen the logical chain before the 1-loop SM counterterms are used as input for two-loop work.
minor comments (5)
  1. Throughout the manuscript (especially the abstract and Secs. 1, 5) many compound words appear without spaces (“1-looprenormalisation”, “symmetry-restoringcounterterms”, “gaugeboson”, etc.). These should be corrected for readability.
  2. Sec. 5.1, Eqs. (11)–(14): the photon, Z, W± and gluon currents are written after the mass-eigenstate rotation; a one-sentence reminder of the relation between the twelveplet generators and the physical fields would help readers who jump directly to this section.
  3. App. C, Eqs. (34)–(35): the notation (YlL YlR)ab versus (YlR)2ab is slightly ambiguous; clarifying whether the products are matrix products in generation/doublet space would avoid misreading.
  4. The reference list is heavily weighted toward the authors’ own series. While justified for a status report, a brief comparative sentence in Sec. 1 or 5.3 noting how the present Rξ-gauge results relate to the background-field finite counterterms of Ref. [11] would improve context for non-specialists.
  5. Sec. 4: the statement that the number of admissible local operators is finite is important; a short pointer to the power-counting/ghost-number argument (or to Ref. [39]) already in the main text would make the renormalisability claim self-contained.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: counterterms are extracted from Green functions via the independent Slavnov-Taylor condition; self-citations supply prior multi-loop calculations rather than defining the SM results.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 2 (methodology) and Sec. 4 (multi-loop)]
    "Our methodology for the latter uses the regularised quantum action principle and has been developed and applied in Refs. [6–9, 13, 15, 16, 30–32] (see particularly Refs. [2, 5] for detailed discussions)"

    The central restoration procedure and the claim of finite operator bases up to 4 loops rest on a chain of overlapping-author citations. While those papers contain independent calculations, the present proceedings treats their validity as given rather than re-deriving the quantum-action principle for the non-Abelian SM; this is a mild self-citation dependence, not a definitional loop that forces the SM counterterms.

full rationale

The paper is a status/proceedings summary whose load-bearing claims are (i) the algebraic restoration condition LIM S_D(Γ)=0 (Eqs. 1–3) derived from the regularised quantum action principle and (ii) explicit evaluation of ordinary and Δ-inserted 1PI Green functions that determine both divergent and finite counterterms. These steps do not reduce by construction to their inputs: the operator basis is constrained by power counting and ghost number, the coefficients (e.g. App. C Eqs. 34–36) are computed rather than postulated, and consistency is checked by matching the same non-symmetric structures from two independent classes of Green functions. Heavy self-citation of the authors’ earlier Abelian multi-loop papers and reviews is present and expected for a status report, yet those works supply independent calculations that are merely re-used as methodology; they do not force the SM counterterms or the saturation argument. No fitted parameters are re-labelled as predictions, no uniqueness theorem is imported to forbid alternatives, and the two-parameter family of evanescent generators is explored rather than declared unique. The only minor self-referential element is the reliance on the group’s own prior verification of the quantum-action-principle machinery, which does not circularise the new SM results. Score 1 reflects that single non-load-bearing self-citation chain; the derivation itself remains self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard BMHV definition of γ5, the regularised quantum action principle, and conventional power-counting renormalisability. Two continuous parameters (c_QED, c_QCD) that control the D-dimensional continuation of vector currents are free choices of regularisation; they do not affect physical observables once counterterms are adjusted. No new dynamical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • c_QED = 0 or 1 (preferred)
    Continuous parameter (0 or 1 preferred) that interpolates between purely 4-dimensional and fully D-dimensional photon currents; chosen by hand to minimise counterterm complexity (Eq. 10).
  • c_QCD = 0 or 1 (preferred)
    Analogous continuous parameter for the gluon current; again a free regularisation choice (Eq. 10).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption γ5 is strictly 4-dimensional and anticommutes only with the 4-dimensional Dirac matrices (BMHV definition).
    Foundational definition of the scheme used throughout (Sec. 2).
  • domain assumption The regularised quantum action principle holds in DReg for the SM, so that the Slavnov-Taylor breaking is given by a single local insertion Δ.
    Invoked to derive the restoration condition Eq. (3) (Sec. 2).
  • standard math Power counting and renormalisability bound the basis of local operators of ghost number 1 that can appear in the breaking at each loop order.
    Used to argue that only finitely many counterterms are needed (Sec. 4).
  • domain assumption Option-1 construction of natural D-dimensional Dirac spinors is a valid regularisation choice for massive SM fermions.
    Chosen in Sec. 5.1; alternative Option 2 is discarded for technical reasons.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dimensional Regularisation with Non-Anticommuting $\gamma_5$: Status and Application to the Standard Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PZPWCT7J

@misc{pith2026260708847,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dimensional Regularisation with Non-Anticommuting $\gamma_5$: Status and Application to the Standard Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PZPWCT7J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08847}
}
abstract

A consistent all-order treatment of $\gamma_5$ in dimensional regularisation (DReg), as provided by the Breitenlohner-Maison/'t Hooft-Veltman (BMHV) scheme, is essential for high-precision electroweak calculations, but comes at the cost of a regularisation-induced violation of gauge and BRST invariance that must be reinstated via symmetry-restoring counterterms. We report on the current status of our research on the BMHV scheme, from its $D$-dimensional realisation and its multi-loop behaviour up to the 4-loop order, to its most recent application: the complete 1-loop renormalisation of the Standard Model (SM), including both divergent and finite symmetry-restoring counterterms. For the latter, we discuss the main intricacies of the BMHV treatment and present a representative excerpt of the resulting counterterms.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references

  1. [10]

    The Standard Model with Non-Anticommuting𝛾5 in the BMHV Scheme.To be published

    Paul Kühler, Andreas von Manteuffel, Dominik Stöckinger, and Matthias Weißwange. The Standard Model with Non-Anticommuting𝛾5 in the BMHV Scheme.To be published

  2. [1]

    Jegerlehner

    F. Jegerlehner. Facts of life with gamma(5).Eur. Phys. J. C, 18:673–679, 2001

    2001

  3. [2]

    Introduction to Renormalization Theory and Chiral Gauge Theories in Dimensional Regularization with Non-Anticommuting𝛾5.Symmetry, 15(3):622, 2023

    Hermès Bélusca-Maïto, Amon Ilakovac, Paul Kühler, Marija Mađor-Božinović, Dominik Stöckinger, and Matthias Weißwange. Introduction to Renormalization Theory and Chiral Gauge Theories in Dimensional Regularization with Non-Anticommuting𝛾5.Symmetry, 15(3):622, 2023

    2023

  4. [3]

    Gerard ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman. Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields. Nucl. Phys. B, 44:189–213, 1972

    1972

  5. [4]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison. Dimensional Renormalization and the Action Principle. Commun. Math. Phys., 52:11–38, 1977

    1977

  6. [5]

    PhD thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, Institut für Kern- und Teilchenphysik, Dresden, Tech

    Matthias Weißwange.Renormalisation of Chiral Gauge Theories with Non-Anticommuting 𝛾5 at the Multi-Loop Level. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, Institut für Kern- und Teilchenphysik, Dresden, Tech. U., 2025

    2025

  7. [6]

    Sheddinglighton evanescentshadows—Explorationofnon-anticommuting𝛾 5 inDimensionalRegularisation

    PaulL.Ebert,PaulKühler,DominikStöckinger,andMatthiasWeißwange. Sheddinglighton evanescentshadows—Explorationofnon-anticommuting𝛾 5 inDimensionalRegularisation. JHEP, 01:114, 2025

    2025

  8. [7]

    Full three-loop renormalisation of an abelian chiral gauge theory with non-anticommuting𝛾5 in the BMHV scheme.JHEP, 02:139, 2024

    Dominik Stöckinger and Matthias Weißwange. Full three-loop renormalisation of an abelian chiral gauge theory with non-anticommuting𝛾5 in the BMHV scheme.JHEP, 02:139, 2024

    2024

Show all 39 references
  1. [8]

    Four-loop renor- malisationofchiralgaugetheorieswithnon-anticommuting𝛾 5 intheBMHVscheme.JHEP, 08:088, 2025

    Andreas von Manteuffel, Dominik Stöckinger, and Matthias Weißwange. Four-loop renor- malisationofchiralgaugetheorieswithnon-anticommuting𝛾 5 intheBMHVscheme.JHEP, 08:088, 2025

    2025

  2. [9]

    HermèsBélusca-Maïto,AmonIlakovac,PaulKühler,MarijaMađor-Božinović,andDominik Stöckinger. Two-loopapplicationoftheBreitenlohner-Maison/’tHooft-Veltmanschemewith non-anticommuting𝛾 5: full renormalization and symmetry-restoring counterterms in an abelian chiral gauge theory.JHEP...

    2021

  3. [11]

    Spurious gauge-invariance and𝛾 5 in dimensional regularization.JHEP, 12:080, 2024

    Pablo Olgoso Ruiz and Luca Vecchi. Spurious gauge-invariance and𝛾 5 in dimensional regularization.JHEP, 12:080, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    C. P. Martin and D. Sanchez-Ruiz. Action principles, restoration of BRS symmetry and the renormalization group equation for chiral nonAbelian gauge theories in dimensional renor- malization with a nonanticommuting gamma(5).Nucl. Phys. B, 572:387–477, 2000

    2000

  5. [13]

    DimensionalregularizationandBreitenlohner-Maison/’tHooft-Veltmanschemefor𝛾 5applied tochiralYMtheories: fullone-loopcountertermandRGEstructure.JHEP,08(08):024,2020

    Hermès Bélusca-Maïto, Amon Ilakovac, Marija Mađor-Božinović, and Dominik Stöckinger. DimensionalregularizationandBreitenlohner-Maison/’tHooft-Veltmanschemefor𝛾 5applied tochiralYMtheories: fullone-loopcountertermandRGEstructure.JHEP,08(08):024,2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    Gaugeinvarianceandfinitecountert- erms in chiral gauge theories.JHEP, 02:244, 2023

    ClaudiaCornella,FerruccioFeruglio,andLucaVecchi. Gaugeinvarianceandfinitecountert- erms in chiral gauge theories.JHEP, 02:244, 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    Two-loop renormalization of a chiral SU(2) gauge theory in dimensional regularization with non-anticommuting𝛾5.JHEP, 07:082, 2025

    Paul Kühler and Dominik Stöckinger. Two-loop renormalization of a chiral SU(2) gauge theory in dimensional regularization with non-anticommuting𝛾5.JHEP, 07:082, 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Advances at the𝛾5-Frontier

    Paul Kühler, Dominik Stöckinger, and Matthias Weißwange. Advances at the𝛾5-Frontier. PoS, LL2024:022, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Low-energyeffectivefieldtheorybelowtheelectroweakscale: one-loop renormalization in the ’t Hooft-Veltman scheme.JHEP, 02:068, 2024

    LucaNateropandPeterStoffer. Low-energyeffectivefieldtheorybelowtheelectroweakscale: one-loop renormalization in the ’t Hooft-Veltman scheme.JHEP, 02:068, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Renormalization-group equations of the LEFT at two loops: dimension-five effects.JHEP, 06:007, 2025

    Luca Naterop and Peter Stoffer. Renormalization-group equations of the LEFT at two loops: dimension-five effects.JHEP, 06:007, 2025

    2025

  11. [19]

    Renormalization-group equations of the LEFT at two loops: dimension-six baryon-number-violating operators.JHEP, 07:237, 2025

    Luca Naterop and Peter Stoffer. Renormalization-group equations of the LEFT at two loops: dimension-six baryon-number-violating operators.JHEP, 07:237, 2025

    2025

  12. [20]

    Renormalization-group equations of the LEFT at two loops: dimension-six operators.JHEP, 02:016, 2026

    Luca Naterop and Peter Stoffer. Renormalization-group equations of the LEFT at two loops: dimension-six operators.JHEP, 02:016, 2026

    2026

  13. [21]

    Subleading operators and𝛾 5-scheme dependence in SMEFT for Higgs boson pair production.PoS, LL2024:021, 2024

    GudrunHeinrich, StefanoDiNoi, RamonaGröber, JannisLang,LudovicScyboz,andMarco Vitti. Subleading operators and𝛾 5-scheme dependence in SMEFT for Higgs boson pair production.PoS, LL2024:021, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Renormalisation group effects in SMEFT for di-Higgs production

    Gudrun Heinrich and Jannis Lang. Renormalisation group effects in SMEFT for di-Higgs production. 9 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Stefano Di Noi, Ramona Gröber, Gudrun Heinrich, Jannis Lang, and Marco Vitti.𝛾5 schemes and the interplay of SMEFT operators in the Higgs-gluon coupling.Phys. Rev. D, 109(9):095024, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Di Noi, R

    S. Di Noi, R. Gröber, and P. Olgoso. Mapping between𝛾5 schemes in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory.JHEP, 09:027, 2025. 13 Dimensional Regularisation with Non-Anticommuting𝛾 5: Status and Application to the Standard Model

    2025

  17. [25]

    Constraining four-heavy-quark operators with top-quark, Higgs, and electroweak precision data.JHEP, 01:025, 2026

    Stefano Di Noi, Hesham El Faham, Ramona Gröber, Marco Vitti, and Eleni Vryonidou. Constraining four-heavy-quark operators with top-quark, Higgs, and electroweak precision data.JHEP, 01:025, 2026

    2026

  18. [26]

    Two loops, four tops and two𝛾5 schemes: A renormal- ization story.Phys

    Stefano Di Noi and Ramona Gröber. Two loops, four tops and two𝛾5 schemes: A renormal- ization story.Phys. Lett. B, 869:139878, 2025

    2025

  19. [27]

    Symmetry restoration in the SMEFT: finite counterterms for a non-anticommuting gamma-5.JHEP, 02:150, 2026

    Javier Fuentes-Martín, Adrián Moreno-Sánchez, and Anders Eller Thomsen. Symmetry restoration in the SMEFT: finite counterterms for a non-anticommuting gamma-5.JHEP, 02:150, 2026

    2026

  20. [28]

    Symmetry-restoring finite counterterms of SMEFT four-fermion operator insertions at one loop.JHEP, 06:143, 2026

    Sergio Ferrando Solera, Sebastian Jäger, and Luiz Vale Silva. Symmetry-restoring finite counterterms of SMEFT four-fermion operator insertions at one loop.JHEP, 06:143, 2026

    2026

  21. [29]

    Axion EFT in the BMHV Scheme: Flavor Currents, Evanescent Operators and Ward Identities

    Deepanshu Bisht, Sabyasachi Chakraborty, and Atanu Samanta. Axion EFT in the BMHV Scheme: Flavor Currents, Evanescent Operators and Ward Identities. 3 2026

    2026

  22. [30]

    Treatment of𝛾5 in Dimensionally-Regularized Chiral Yang-Mills Theory with Scalar Fields

    Hermès Bélusca-Maïto, Amon Ilakovac, Marija Mađor-Božinović, and Dominik Stöckinger. Treatment of𝛾5 in Dimensionally-Regularized Chiral Yang-Mills Theory with Scalar Fields. PoS, CORFU2019:090, 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Bonneau Identities.PoS, CORFU2019:089, 2020

    Hermès Bélusca-Maïto, Amon Ilakovac, Marija Mađor-Božinović, and Dominik Stöckinger. Bonneau Identities.PoS, CORFU2019:089, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Gamma5 in dimensional regularization - a no-compromise approach using the BMHV scheme.PoS, LL2022:011, 2022

    HermèsBélusca-Maïto,AmonIlakovac,MarijaMađor-Božinović,PaulKühler,andDominik Stöckinger. Gamma5 in dimensional regularization - a no-compromise approach using the BMHV scheme.PoS, LL2022:011, 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Regularization by dimensional reduction: consistency, quantum action principle, and supersymmetry.JHEP, 03:076, 2005

    Dominik Stockinger. Regularization by dimensional reduction: consistency, quantum action principle, and supersymmetry.JHEP, 03:076, 2005

    2005

  26. [34]

    DimensionallyRenormalizedGreen’sFunctionsforTheories with Massless Particles

    P.BreitenlohnerandD.Maison. DimensionallyRenormalizedGreen’sFunctionsforTheories with Massless Particles. 1.Commun. Math. Phys., 52:39, 1977

    1977

  27. [35]

    DimensionallyRenormalizedGreen’sFunctionsforTheories with Massless Particles

    P.BreitenlohnerandD.Maison. DimensionallyRenormalizedGreen’sFunctionsforTheories with Massless Particles. 2.Commun. Math. Phys., 52:55, 1977

    1977

  28. [36]

    J. A. M. Vermaseren. New features of FORM. 10 2000

    2000

  29. [37]

    FORM version 4.2

    Ben Ruijl, Takahiro Ueda, and Jos Vermaseren. FORM version 4.2. 7 2017

    2017

  30. [38]

    FORM version 4.3.1 — Reference Manual, 4 2023

    Ben Ruijl, Takahiro Ueda, Jos Vermaseren, Toshiaki Kaneko, Jan Kuipers, Misha Tentyukov, and Jens Vollinga. FORM version 4.3.1 — Reference Manual, 4 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Piguet and S

    O. Piguet and S. P. Sorella.Algebraic renormalization: Perturbative renormalization, sym- metries and anomalies, volume 28. 1995. 14

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.