Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Symmetry-constrained low-energy effective Hamiltonian for topological RuC and OsC monolayers

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Monolayer OsC and RuC are described by a BHZ-like four-band model whose dominant interband coupling is quadratic, not linear.

desk verdict Solid, usable first k·p model for RuC/OsC: D3h forces quadratic (not linear) hybridization; form is clean, fit is honest, scope is narrow. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.09129 v1 pith:AMNRHKPQ submitted 2026-07-10 physics.app-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci

A. Baradaran , O. Sedaghatfar This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords two-dimensionaltopologicalinsulatorsquantumspinHalleffectlow-energyeffectiveHamiltoniank·ptheoryspin-orbitcouplingrutheniumcarbideosmiumBHZmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper supplies the missing analytical low-energy theory for two hexagonal transition-metal carbide monolayers that first-principles work has already flagged as two-dimensional topological insulators. Starting from the D3h crystal symmetry at the zone center, the authors build an eight-band k·p Hamiltonian that includes spin–orbit coupling, then use Löwdin partitioning to fold it down to a compact four-band model. The resulting Hamiltonian is block-diagonal with two time-reversal-related blocks, exactly as in the classic Bernevig–Hughes–Zhang model, yet the symmetry-allowed hybridization between those blocks is quadratic in momentum rather than linear. Fitted parameters recover the DFT band inversion and spin–orbit gap near Γ for both OsC and RuC. The model therefore gives a practical, symmetry-faithful tool for studying strain, fields, edges and other low-energy phenomena in these candidate quantum-spin-Hall materials.

What carries the argument

The four-band Hamiltonian of Eq. (9)/(13)–(14), whose off-diagonal block is H3(k) = i N k_− + B3 k_+^{2} with N negligible, so that the hybridization is purely quadratic and carries double angular winding.

What would settle it

Compute or measure the low-energy dispersion of either monolayer under a weak magnetic field or strain that the model predicts will open or close the gap in a specific way; any qualitative mismatch near Γ falsifies the quadratic-coupling form.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A symmetry-constrained 4×4 effective Hamiltonian for planar hexagonal OsC and RuC, obtained by Löwdin downfolding of an 8×8 spin–orbit parent model, is block-diagonal with two time-reversal-related blocks analogous to the BHZ model; the dominant off-diagonal term is the quadratic coupling B3 k_+^{2} (linear coefficient N ≃ 0), and the fitted parameters quantitatively reproduce the ab initio low-energy band inversion and gap near Γ.

Load-bearing premise

That the chosen four-orbital parent basis and second-order elimination of remote bands remain accurate enough inside the narrow fitting windows around Γ, even though the conduction-band mass is already poorly matched and OsC’s true conduction minimum sits at K.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Strain, electric fields and disorder can now be treated analytically inside the same four-band model rather than by repeated DFT.
  • Edge-state spectra and finite-size topological transport in OsC/RuC nanoribbons become accessible by standard BHZ-style methods.
  • The double-winding quadratic hybridization implies a distinct Landau-level structure under magnetic field compared with linear BHZ models.
  • The same symmetry pipeline can be reused for other D3h transition-metal monocarbide monolayers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the hybridization is quadratic, the model’s topological gap should be more sensitive to lattice strain that alters second-order remote-band couplings than to linear Rashba-like terms.
  • An electron-doped OsC device would require an additional K-valley Hamiltonian; the present Γ model alone cannot describe the transport minimum.
  • The same double-winding structure may appear in other E″-derived 2D carbides once their remote A″2 bands are folded down.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a symmetry-constrained low-energy k·p Hamiltonian for planar hexagonal monolayer OsC and RuC. DFT (GGA-WC) shows dynamical stability and a nontrivial Z2 = 1 (lattice Chern number), with SOC-induced band inversion of predominantly d-orbital states near Γ. From D3h irreps of the CB/VB (E″), VB–1 (A′1) and VB–2 (A″2) states, an 8×8 SOC parent Hamiltonian is written (Eq. 7); Löwdin partitioning then yields a 4×4 model (Eqs. 9–14) that is block-diagonal into two time-reversal-related 2×2 blocks analogous to BHZ, but with dominant quadratic off-diagonal hybridization B3 k_+^{2} (N ≃ 0). Fitted parameters (Tab. 3) reproduce the DFT low-energy inversion and gap inside declared windows (|k| < 0.1 Å⁻¹ OsC, |k| < 0.05 Å⁻¹ RuC; Fig. 2). Apparent-mass comparisons (Tab. 4) and the limited validity for OsC’s K-valley CBM are discussed in Sec. 3.4.

Significance. If the derivation and fits hold, the paper supplies the first compact, symmetry-derived analytical Hamiltonian for these two candidate 2D TIs, filling a gap left by prior DFT-only work on OsC. The explicit D3h selection rules, character/product tables, and fully written 8×8 → 4×4 Löwdin reduction (Appendices B–D) make the origin of the quadratic B3 term transparent and reusable for strain, gating, magnetic-field, or edge-state studies. The model is therefore a useful bridge between first-principles band structures and low-energy phenomenology for RuC/OsC-based nanostructures, even though its quantitative reach is deliberately limited to the Γ-centered window.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. 3.4 and Tab. 4: the conduction-band apparent masses extracted from the 4×4 model deviate by 56–78 % from DFT even after window optimization, while valence-band masses agree to <1 %. The manuscript correctly attributes this to omitted remote bands and (for OsC) the true CBM at K. Because the abstract and conclusions advertise a model “for analyzing the electronic and topological properties,” the text should more sharply restrict the claimed domain of quantitative reliability to the valence edge and the Γ-centered gap, and should state explicitly that electron-doped transport or CB effective-mass predictions require an extended basis.
  2. Sec. 2.2 / Tab. 1 and Fig. 2: GGA is known to underestimate gaps; the reported SOC gaps (OsC ~312 meV, RuC ~111 meV at Γ) are therefore lower bounds. A single hybrid-functional or GW check of the inverted gap (or at least a clear caveat that absolute gap values are not quantitative) would strengthen the topological-gap claim that motivates the effective model.
minor comments (5)
  1. Fig. 2 caption and main text: the fitting windows are written inconsistently as “|k|<0.1−1” / “0.05 −1”; they should be “Å⁻¹” throughout.
  2. Eq. (11) and subsequent discussion: N is stated to be negligible, yet it is retained in the general form; a short remark that γ1 is symmetry-allowed but numerically zero for these materials would avoid confusion.
  3. Appendix A: orbital projections are shown only for RuC; a parallel panel or sentence for OsC would confirm that the same four-orbital parent basis is justified for both compounds.
  4. References: a few recent experimental or theoretical works on related 2D transition-metal carbides / MXene TIs could be added for context, but this is optional.
  5. Notation: the free-electron ħ²k²/2m term is absorbed into the band energies early on, yet reappears in the Löwdin expressions for B1,2 (App. D); a clarifying sentence would help readers tracking the kinetic contribution.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Standard symmetry-derived k·p form plus ordinary least-squares fit to DFT; the only mild circularity is calling the successful fit a 'reproduction' of the same bands.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract; Sec. 3.3 (Eq. 12, Tab. 3, Fig. 2)]
    "The fitted parameters reproduce the ab initio band structures in the low-energy region, yielding a compact model... The optimized quantity was a weighted absolute band-energy mismatch... The fitted bands are shown by the red dashed lines in Fig. 2"

    Parameters A1,2, B1,2,3 (and parent Δ,γ) are obtained by least-squares fit to the identical SOC DFT bands that are later said to be 'reproduced'. Within the fitting window the match is true by construction of the minimization; it is not an independent prediction of a distinct observable.

full rationale

The algebraic structure of the parent 8×8 Hamiltonian (Eq. 7) and the reduced 4×4 model (Eqs. 9–14, App. D) is fixed by D3h irreps, character/multiplication tables, and selection rules (App. B–C); this derivation is independent of any numerical data. Löwdin partitioning is a standard algebraic downfolding that absorbs remote-band effects into renormalized coefficients. The parameters (Tab. 3) are obtained by minimizing a weighted absolute mismatch to the SOC DFT bands inside stated windows (Eq. 12); stating that the fitted model 'reproduces' those same bands (abstract, Fig. 2 red curves, Sec. 3.3) is true by construction of a successful fit and is ordinary language for effective models, not a non-tautological prediction. N≃0 is likewise a post-fit observation, not an independent claim. Z2=1 is computed separately via lattice Chern numbers. No self-citation is load-bearing for the form or uniqueness, no uniqueness theorem is imported, and no ansatz is smuggled. The acknowledged quantitative limitations (poor CB masses, OsC CBM at K) are ordinary basis/window caveats, not circularity. Score 1 only for the mild fitted-input phrasing; the central derivation chain is self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard solid-state machinery (Bloch theorem, k·p, Löwdin, D3h representation theory) plus DFT-derived energies and a set of fitted coupling constants. No new particles or forces are invented; the free parameters are the usual effective-model coefficients fixed to first-principles bands.

free parameters (5)
  • A1, A2 (band-edge energies after SOC mixing) = OsC: –0.085 eV, 0.226 eV; RuC: –0.031 eV, 0.080 eV
    Obtained from diagonalization of the k=0 SOC Hamiltonian and then refined by fitting the 4×4 dispersion to DFT near Γ; they set the inverted gap.
  • B1, B2, B3 (quadratic coefficients) = OsC: 114.9, 112.3, –110.0 eV Ų; RuC: 134.7, 135.7, –131.4 eV Ų
    Renormalized by Löwdin projection of remote bands and fitted to DFT curvatures; B3 supplies the dominant interband hybridization.
  • Δ1, Δ2 (effective SOC strengths) = OsC: 0.226 eV, 0.407 eV; RuC: 0.080 eV, 0.171 eV
    Absorbed matrix elements of L·S; fitted so the 8×8 parent matches SOC DFT at Γ.
  • γ1, γ2 (k·p momentum matrix elements) = γ1 ≃ 0; γ2 ≃ –16.2 eV Å (OsC), –14.6 eV Å (RuC)
    Symmetry-allowed linear couplings; γ1 fitted to ~0, γ2 fitted and then generates B3 via downfolding.
  • Fitting windows |k|max = 0.1 Å⁻¹ (OsC), 0.05 Å⁻¹ (RuC)
    Chosen by hand so that remote-band coupling remains small; directly controls which DFT points enter the weighted mismatch (Eq. 12).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption D3h little-group selection rules completely determine which k·p and SOC matrix elements may be nonzero at Γ.
    Used throughout Sec. 3.1–3.2 and Appendices B–C to fix the skeleton of the 8×8 Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption Second-order Löwdin partitioning of remote bands yields a quantitatively adequate 4×4 model inside the chosen k-window.
    Explicitly invoked in Sec. 3.3 and Appendix D; higher-order terms and omitted remote bands are assumed negligible.
  • domain assumption GGA (Wu–Cohen) band ordering and Z2 topology are reliable enough to identify the inverted subspace and topological phase.
    Sec. 2.2; authors note gap underestimation but still use GGA eigenvalues and lattice Chern number for Z2=1.
  • domain assumption Static-lattice approximation; electron–phonon renormalization does not alter the symmetry-allowed form of the Hamiltonian.
    Stated at the end of Sec. 3.3; temperature effects are deferred.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symmetry-constrained low-energy effective Hamiltonian for topological RuC and OsC monolayers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AMNRHKPQ

@misc{pith2026260709129,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symmetry-constrained low-energy effective Hamiltonian for topological RuC and OsC monolayers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AMNRHKPQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.09129}
}
abstract

We derive a low-energy $\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{p}$ effective Hamiltonian for monolayer osmium carbide (OsC) and ruthenium carbide (RuC) in a planar hexagonal configuration. First-principles calculations indicate that both monolayers are dynamically stable and exhibit features of a two-dimensional quantum spin Hall (QSH) phase, characterized by a nontrivial $\mathbb{Z}_2$ topological invariant. Using symmetry analysis at the $\Gamma$ point, we construct a multiband $\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{p}$ Hamiltonian including spin-orbit coupling and reduce it to a four-band low-energy model through L\"owdin partitioning. The effective Hamiltonian has a block-diagonal form, with two blocks related by time-reversal symmetry, analogous to the Bernevig--Hughes--Zhang (BHZ) model. In contrast to the standard BHZ form, the symmetry-allowed off-diagonal coupling contains quadratic momentum-dependent terms, which modify the low-energy dispersion near the $\Gamma$ point. The fitted parameters reproduce the ab initio band structures in the low-energy region, yielding a compact model for analyzing the electronic and topological properties of monolayer OsC and RuC.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09129 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic view of the monolayer XC lattice (X = Os or Ru): top view (top) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Band structures of monolayer OsC (left) and RuC (right) in the planar hexagonal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Point-Group Theory Tables

    Altmann, S.L., Herzig, P., 1994. Point-Group Theory Tables. Clarendon Press. ISBN: 0198552262, 9780198552260. 28

    1994

  2. [2]

    Quan- tumspinhallstatesandtopologicalphasetransitioningermanene

    Bampoulis, P., Castenmiller, C., Klaassen, D.J., van Mil, J., Liu, Y., Liu, C.C., Yao, Y., Ezawa, M., Rudenko, A.N., Zandvliet, H.J.W., 2023. Quan- tumspinhallstatesandtopologicalphasetransitioningermanene. Physical Review Letters 130, 196401. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.196401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.196401 2023

  3. [3]

    Bias-voltage-induced topological phase transition in finite size quantum spin hall systems in the presence of a transverse electric field

    Baradaran, A., Ghaffarian, M., 2020. Bias-voltage-induced topological phase transition in finite size quantum spin hall systems in the presence of a transverse electric field. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 122, 114173. doi:10.1016/j.physe.2020.114173

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physe.2020.114173 2020

  4. [4]

    Baradaran, A., Ghaffarian, M., 2022. Topological viewpoint of two- dimensional group iii–v and iv–iv compounds in the presence of electric field and spin–orbit coupling by density functional theory and tight-binding model. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 34, 145502. doi:10.1088/ 1361-648X/ac4b7e

    2022

  5. [5]

    New room- temperature 2d hexagonal topological insulator osc: First principle cal- culations

    Bentaibi, B., Drissi, L.B., Saidi, E.H., Bousmina, M., 2022. New room- temperature 2d hexagonal topological insulator osc: First principle cal- culations. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing 151, 107009. doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2022.107009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2022.107009 2022

  6. [6]

    Quantum spin hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells

    Bernevig, B.A., Hughes, T.L., Zhang, S.C., 2006. Quantum spin hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells. Science 314, 1757–

    2006

  7. [7]

    doi:10.1126/science.1133734

    doi:10.1126/science.1133734

  8. [8]

    Überdiequantenmechanikderelektroneninkristallgittern

    Bloch, F., 1929. Überdiequantenmechanikderelektroneninkristallgittern. Zeitschrift für Physik 52, 555–600. doi:10.1007/BF01339455

    doi:10.1007/bf01339455 1929

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Exchange-correlation functionals for band gaps of solids: Bench- mark, reparametrization and machine learning

    Borlido, P., Schmidt, J., Huran, A.W., Tran, F., Marques, M.A.L., Botti, S., 2020. Exchange-correlation functionals for band gaps of solids: Bench- mark, reparametrization and machine learning. npj Computational Mate- rials 6, 96. doi:10.1038/s41524-020-00360-0

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    Cockton, N.A., Sfigakis, F., Korkusinski, M., Harrigan, S.R., Nichols, G., Merino, Z.D., Zou, T., Coschizza, A.C., Joshi, T., Shetty, A., Tam, M.C., 29 Wasilewski, Z.R., Studenikin, S.A., Austing, D.G., Baugh, J., Kycia, J.B.,

  3. [11]

    URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10852,arXiv:2602.10852

    Enhanced effective masses, spin-orbit polarization, and dispersion relations in 2d hole gases under strongly asymmetric confinement. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10852,arXiv:2602.10852

  4. [12]

    Monolayer topological insulators: Silicene, germanene, and stanene

    Ezawa, M., 2015. Monolayer topological insulators: Silicene, germanene, and stanene. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 84, 121003. doi:10. 7566/JPSJ.84.121003

    2015

  5. [13]

    New phases of osmium carbide from evolu- tionary algorithm and ab initio computations

    Fadda, A., Fadda, G., 2017. New phases of osmium carbide from evolu- tionary algorithm and ab initio computations. Materials Research Express 4, 096503. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/aa807f

    2017 doi

  6. [15]

    Time reversal polarization and a z2 adiabatic spin pump

    Fu, L., Kane, C.L., 2006. Time reversal polarization and a z2 adiabatic spin pump. Physical Review B 74, 195312. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.195312

    2006 doi

  7. [16]

    Topological insulators in three dimen- sions

    Fu, L., Kane, C.L., Mele, E.J., 2007. Topological insulators in three dimen- sions. Physical Review Letters 98, 106803. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98. 106803

    2007 doi

  8. [17]

    Quantum spin hall effect in three dimen- sional materials: Lattice computation of z2 topological invariants and its application to bi and sb

    Fukui, T., Hatsugai, Y., 2007. Quantum spin hall effect in three dimen- sional materials: Lattice computation of z2 topological invariants and its application to bi and sb. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 76, 053702. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.76.053702

    2007 doi

  9. [18]

    Transition metal carbides go 2d

    Gogotsi, Y., 2015. Transition metal carbides go 2d. Nature Materials 14, 1079–1080. doi:10.1038/nmat4386

    2015 doi

  10. [19]

    Two dimensional ruthenium carbide: Structural and electronic features

    Gorkan, T., Demirci, S., Jahangirov, S., Gökoğlu, G., Aktürk, E., 2020. Two dimensional ruthenium carbide: Structural and electronic features. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 22, 15488–15495. doi:10.1039/ D0CP01990A. 30

    2020

  11. [20]

    Norm-conserving pseu- dopotentials

    Hamann, D.R., Schlüter, M., Chiang, C., 1979. Norm-conserving pseu- dopotentials. Physical Review Letters 43, 1494–1497. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.43.1494

    1979

  12. [21]

    Improved adsorption energetics within density-functional theory using revised perdew-burke- ernzerhof functionals

    Hammer, B., Hansen, L.B., Nørskov, J.K., 1999. Improved adsorption energetics within density-functional theory using revised perdew-burke- ernzerhof functionals. Physical Review B 59, 7413–7421. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.59.7413

    1999

  13. [22]

    Quantum spin hall effect in graphene

    Kane, C.L., Mele, E.J., 2005. Quantum spin hall effect in graphene. Phys- ical Review Letters 95, 226801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.226801

    2005 doi

  14. [23]

    Band structure of indium antimonide

    Kane, E.O., 1957. Band structure of indium antimonide. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 1, 249–261. doi:10.1016/0022-3697(57)90013-6

    1957 doi

  15. [24]

    Further investigations of ruc and osc

    Kempter, C.P., 1964. Further investigations of ruc and osc. The Journal of Chemical Physics 41, 1515–1516. doi:10.1063/1.1726108

    1964 doi

  16. [25]

    Preparation and crystal structures of ruc and osc

    Kempter, C.P., Nadler, M.R., 1960. Preparation and crystal structures of ruc and osc. The Journal of Chemical Physics 33, 1580–1581. doi:10.1063/ 1.1731449

    1960

  17. [26]

    Evidence for helical edge modes in invertedInAs/GaSbquantum wells

    Knez, I., Du, R.R., Sullivan, G., 2011. Evidence for helical edge modes in invertedInAs/GaSbquantum wells. Physical Review Letters 107, 136603. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.136603

    2011 doi

  18. [27]

    Quantum spin hall insulator state in hgte quantum wells

    König, M., Wiedmann, S., Brüne, C., Roth, A., Buhmann, H., Molenkamp, L.W., Qi, X.L., Zhang, S.C., 2007. Quantum spin hall insulator state in hgte quantum wells. Science 318, 766–770. doi:10.1126/science.1148047

    2007 doi

  19. [28]

    Two-dimensional ferroelectric topological insulators in functionalized atom- ically thin bismuth layers

    Kou, L., Fu, H., Ma, Y., Yan, B., Liao, T., Du, A., Chen, C., 2018. Two-dimensional ferroelectric topological insulators in functionalized atom- ically thin bismuth layers. Physical Review B 97, 075429. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.97.075429. 31

    2018

  20. [29]

    Two-dimensional topological insulators: Progress and prospects

    Kou, L., Ma, Y., Sun, Z., Heine, T., Chen, C., 2017. Two-dimensional topological insulators: Progress and prospects. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 8, 1905–1919. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00222

    2017 doi

  21. [30]

    Precise effective masses from density functional perturbation theory

    LaflammeJanssen, J., Gillet, Y., Poncé, S., Martin, A., Torrent, M., Gonze, X., 2016. Precise effective masses from density functional perturbation theory. Physical Review B 93, 205147. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.205147

    2016 doi

  22. [31]

    Predicting hard metallic osmium-carbon compounds under high pressure

    Li, Y., Hao, J., Xu, Y., 2012. Predicting hard metallic osmium-carbon compounds under high pressure. Physics Letters A 376, 3535–3539. doi:10. 1016/j.physleta.2012.10.021

    2012

  23. [32]

    Quantum spin hall effect in silicene and two-dimensional germanium

    Liu, C.C., Feng, W., Yao, Y., 2011. Quantum spin hall effect in silicene and two-dimensional germanium. Physical Review Letters 107, 076802. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.076802

    2011 doi

  24. [33]

    Recent advances and future perspectives of bismuthene: From preparation to applications

    Lu, Z., Yu, D., Hong, Y., Ma, G., Ru, F., Ge, T., Xi, G., Qin, L., Adilov, M., Ashurov, R., Ashurov, K., Chen, D., 2024. Recent advances and future perspectives of bismuthene: From preparation to applications. Materials Today 80, 565–593. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2024.08.024

    2024 doi

  25. [34]

    Motion of electrons and holes in per- turbedperiodicfields

    Luttinger, J.M., Kohn, W., 1955. Motion of electrons and holes in per- turbedperiodicfields. PhysicalReview97, 869–883. doi:10.1103/PhysRev. 97.869

    1955 doi

  26. [35]

    Multibandk·pmodel and fitting scheme for ab initio based electronic structure parameters for wurtzite gaas

    Marquardt, O., Caro, M.A., Koprucki, T., Mathé, P., Willatzen, M., 2020. Multibandk·pmodel and fitting scheme for ab initio based electronic structure parameters for wurtzite gaas. Physical Review B 101, 235147. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.235147

    2020 doi

  27. [36]

    Large-gap quantum spin hall insulators in two-dimensional hafnium halides: Unraveling the impact of strain and substrate

    Meng, R., Pereira, L.M.C., et al., 2024. Large-gap quantum spin hall insulators in two-dimensional hafnium halides: Unraveling the impact of strain and substrate. ACS Omega 9, 31890–31898. doi:10.1021/acsomega. 4c03502. 32

    2024 doi

  28. [37]

    Openmx 2.0: Extended structural equation and statistical modeling

    Neale, M.C., Hunter, M.D., Pritikin, J.N., Zahery, M., Brick, T.R., Kirk- patrick, R.M., Estabrook, R., Bates, T.C., Maes, H.H., Boker, S.M., 2016. Openmx 2.0: Extended structural equation and statistical modeling. Psy- chometrika 81, 535–549. doi:10.1007/s11336-014-9435-8

    2016 doi

  29. [38]

    Modular open-source soft- ware for item factor analysis

    Pritikin, J.N., Hunter, M.D., Boker, S.M., 2015. Modular open-source soft- ware for item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 75, 458–474. doi:10.1177/0013164414554615

    2015 doi

  30. [39]

    Qin, T., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Besenbacher, F., Otyepka, M., Dong, M.,

  31. [40]

    Nano-Micro Letters 13, 183

    Recent progress in emerging two-dimensional transition metal car- bides. Nano-Micro Letters 13, 183. doi:10.1007/s40820-021-00710-7

    doi

  32. [41]

    Bismuthene on a sic substrate: A candidate for a high-temperature quantum spin hall material

    Reis, F., Li, G., Dudy, L., Bauernfeind, M., Glass, S., Hanke, W., Thomale, R., Schäfer, J., Claessen, R., 2017. Bismuthene on a sic substrate: A candidate for a high-temperature quantum spin hall material. Science 357, 287–290. doi:10.1126/science.aai8142

    2017 doi

  33. [42]

    Nonlocal transport in the quantum spin hall state

    Roth, A., Brüne, C., Buhmann, H., Molenkamp, L.W., Maciejko, J., Qi, X.L., Zhang, S.C., 2009. Nonlocal transport in the quantum spin hall state. Science 325, 294–297. doi:10.1126/science.1174736

    2009 doi

  34. [43]

    Large-gap quantum spin hall state in mxenes: d-band topological order in a triangular lattice

    Si, C., Jin, K.H., Zhou, J., Sun, Z., Liu, F., 2016. Large-gap quantum spin hall state in mxenes: d-band topological order in a triangular lattice. Nano Letters 16, 6584–6591. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03118

    2016 doi

  35. [44]

    Electronic and topological band evolution of vb- group transition-metal monocarbides m2c (m = v, nb, or ta) bulk and monolayer

    Sufyan, A., Maghirang, A.B., Macam, G., Huang, Z.Q., Hsu, C.H., Chuang, F.C., 2022. Electronic and topological band evolution of vb- group transition-metal monocarbides m2c (m = v, nb, or ta) bulk and monolayer. Materials Today Communications 32, 103875. doi:10.1016/j. mtcomm....

    2022 doi

  36. [45]

    Band parameters for iii–v compound semiconductors and their alloys

    Vurgaftman, I., Meyer, J.R., Ram-Mohan, L.R., 2001. Band parameters for iii–v compound semiconductors and their alloys. Journal of Applied Physics 89, 5815–5875. doi:10.1063/1.1368156. 33

    2001 doi

  37. [46]

    2024 roadmap on 2d topological insulators

    Weber, B., Fuhrer, M.S., Sheng, X.L., Yang, S.A., Thomale, R., Shamim, S., Molenkamp, L.W., Cobden, D., Pesin, D., Zandvliet, H.J.W., Bam- poulis, P., Claessen, R., Menges, F.R., Gooth, J., Felser, C., Shekhar, C., Tadich, A., Zhao, M., Edmonds, M.T., Jia, J., Bieniek, M., Väy...

    2024 doi

  38. [47]

    Impact of nonparabolic electronic band structure on the optical and transport properties of photovoltaic materials

    Whalley, L.D., Frost, J.M., Morgan, B.J., Walsh, A., 2019. Impact of nonparabolic electronic band structure on the optical and transport properties of photovoltaic materials. Physical Review B 99, 085207. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.085207

    2019 doi

  39. [48]

    Observation of the quantum spin hall effect up to 100 kelvin in a monolayer crystal

    Wu, S., Fatemi, V., Gibson, Q.D., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Cava, R.J., Jarillo-Herrero, P., 2018. Observation of the quantum spin hall effect up to 100 kelvin in a monolayer crystal. Science 359, 76–79. doi:10.1126/ science.aan6003

    2018

  40. [49]

    More accurate generalized gradient approxi- mation for solids

    Wu, Z., Cohen, R.E., 2006. More accurate generalized gradient approxi- mation for solids. Physical Review B 73, 235116. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB. 73.235116

    2006 doi

  41. [50]

    Transition metal carbide- based materials: Synthesis and applications in electrochemical energy stor- age

    Xiao, Y., Hwang, J.Y., Sun, Y.K., 2016. Transition metal carbide- based materials: Synthesis and applications in electrochemical energy stor- age. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 4, 10379–10393. doi:10.1039/ C6TA03832H

    2016

  42. [51]

    Spin-orbit gap of graphene: First-principles calculations

    Yao, Y., Ye, F., Qi, X.L., Zhang, S.C., Fang, Z., 2007. Spin-orbit gap of graphene: First-principles calculations. Physical Review B 75, 041401. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.041401

    2007 doi

  43. [52]

    Two-dimensional mx dirac materials and quantum spin hall insulators with tunable electronic and topological properties

    Zhang, Y.F., Pan, J., Banjade, H., Yu, J., Lin, H., Bansil, A., Du, S., Yan, Q., 2021. Two-dimensional mx dirac materials and quantum spin hall insulators with tunable electronic and topological properties. Nano Research 14, 584–589. doi:10.1007/s12274-020-3022-3. 34

    2021 doi

  44. [53]

    Strain tunable semimetal–topological- insulator transition in monolayer1T′-wte2

    Zhao, C., Hu, M., Qin, J., Xia, B., Liu, C., Wang, S., Guan, D., Li, Y., Zheng, H., Liu, J., Jia, J., 2020. Strain tunable semimetal–topological- insulator transition in monolayer1T′-wte2. Physical Review Letters 125, 046801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.046801

    2020 doi

  45. [54]

    Topological and chiral phonons in two- dimensional transitional metal monocarbide monolayers

    Zhao, Y., Wang, J., Gao, W., Liu, H., Chelikowsky, J.R., Qian, S., Wang, X., Ding, F., Gao, J., 2026. Topological and chiral phonons in two- dimensional transitional metal monocarbide monolayers. Applied Physics Letters 128, 072203. doi:10.1063/5.0302582

    2026 doi

  46. [55]

    Superhard hexagonal transition metal and its carbide and nitride: Os, osc, and osn

    Zheng, J.C., 2005. Superhard hexagonal transition metal and its carbide and nitride: Os, osc, and osn. Physical Review B 72, 052105. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.72.052105. 35

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.