Reformation of Supercritical Perpendicular Shock

Daniel B. Graham; Domenico Trotta; Yuri V. Khotyaintsev

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 22 references

Supercritical perpendicular shocks rebuild themselves through a Hall-field and reflected-ion feedback cycle, not mainly surface rippling.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 03:21 UTC pith:MN63VU5K

load-bearing objection Solid data–simulation match showing Hall/foot feedback drives reformation at nearly perpendicular shocks; 2-D geometry is the real limit, already flagged by the authors. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09389 v1 pith:MN63VU5K submitted 2026-07-10 physics.space-ph physics.plasm-ph

Reformation of Supercritical Perpendicular Shock

Yuri V. Khotyaintsev , Domenico Trotta , Daniel B. Graham This is my paper

classification physics.space-ph physics.plasm-ph

keywords collisionless shocksshock reformationHall electric fieldreflected ionshybrid simulationbow shocknon-stationarityperpendicular shock

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Nearly perpendicular supercritical shocks are known to be non-stationary, but it has been unclear whether the observed variability is mostly surface rippling or cyclic reformation of the transition itself. This paper uses MMS data of a nearly perpendicular bow shock together with high-resolution two-dimensional hybrid simulations to show that the dominant process is reformation. Strong Hall electric fields reflect incoming ions, building a foot of returning ions; the foot then weakens the Hall field, reflection drops, the foot decays, and the cycle restarts. The same cycle operates at different phases along the shock surface, so a spacecraft records repeated ion phase-space holes and intense localized Hall fields. The result matters because it identifies a concrete, self-regulating ion-scale mechanism that organizes most of the non-stationarity seen at Earth's bow shock under these conditions.

Core claim

The non-stationarity of a nearly perpendicular supercritical shock—repeated ion phase-space holes and intense localized Hall electric fields—is produced by a self-regulating feedback cycle: strong Hall-field ion reflection builds a reflected-ion foot that weakens the Hall field and suppresses further reflection until the foot decays and the cycle restarts. This reformation cycle, spatially organized by the two-dimensional shock structure, accounts for most of the observed variability rather than large-scale surface rippling alone.

What carries the argument

The self-regulating Hall–reflected-ion feedback cycle: the normal Hall electric field reflects ions into a foot; the foot raises density and softens the magnetic gradient, weakening the Hall field; once the foot drains, the ramp steepens again and reflection resumes. Neighboring patches of the shock sit at different phases of the same cycle.

Load-bearing premise

That a two-dimensional hybrid simulation with the magnetic field strictly out of the plane, plus a virtual spacecraft flying at the observed shock speed, is enough to decide that reformation dominates even though the simulated ion holes look different from the observed ones and three-dimensional rippling is absent.

What would settle it

A multi-spacecraft or multi-point measurement that simultaneously samples the same shock surface and finds large-amplitude normal magnetic-field fluctuations and surface corrugation without the Hall-field/reflected-ion density anti-correlation predicted by the reformation cycle.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

Solid data–simulation match showing Hall/foot feedback drives reformation at nearly perpendicular shocks; 2-D geometry is the real limit, already flagged by the authors.

read the letter

The punchline is that this paper gives a clean, observationally matched picture of why a nearly perpendicular supercritical shock keeps reforming: strong Hall En reflects ions, the foot they build weakens the Hall field, reflection drops, the foot drains, and the cycle restarts. That loop, organized along the 2-D surface, accounts for the repeated phase-space holes and the Eni spikes MMS sees when the ramp is retreating.

What is new is not reformation itself (that is classical) but the concrete causal loop and the virtual-spacecraft demonstration that it produces the exact signatures in the November 2017 MMS crossing (θBn ≈ 89°, MA ≈ 6). The high-resolution hybrid run (0.2 di, 500 ppc) is carefully matched to the event parameters, the contrasting cuts in Figure 2 make the thin-ramp versus thick-foot states obvious, and the VSC time series in Figure 3 reproduces the multiple compressions, Eni spikes at retreating ramps, and intermittent reflected-ion populations. Data and simulation products are public. That is real work.

The soft spot is exactly the one the authors and the reader already name: the simulation is strictly 2-D with B0 out of plane, so Bn fluctuations and AIC rippling are absent by construction. The simulated phase-space holes are also morphologically skewed and disconnected compared with the more symmetric, connected holes in the MMS data. That means the paper is strong for the reformation channel at this geometry but does not yet settle the full 3-D competition. It is not a hidden flaw; it is stated in the Discussion and Conclusions.

This is for people who work on collisionless shocks and want a concrete, testable mechanism rather than another qualitative debate. The math, the multi-instrument data, and the citation pattern look solid; free parameters are the usual simulation choices and are reported. I would send it to referees without hesitation. Worth reading and worth citing if you care about ion-scale non-stationarity at quasi-perpendicular shocks.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript combines MMS multi-instrument observations of a nearly perpendicular ( heta_Bn \approx 89°), supercritical (M_A imes 6) bow shock with high-resolution 2-D hybrid simulations (HYPSI, eta_i = eta_e = 1, eta_x = eta_y = 0.2 d_i, 500 ppc) to argue that the observed non-stationarity—repeated ion phase-space holes and intense localized Hall electric fields—is produced by a self-regulating reformation cycle. Strong Hall-field reflection builds a reflected-ion foot that weakens the Hall term (via density increase and reduced magnetic gradient), suppressing further reflection until the foot decays and the cycle restarts; the cycle is spatially organized by the 2-D shock structure. Virtual-spacecraft time series through the simulation reproduce the principal MMS signatures (E_ni spikes at retreating ramps, multiple phase-space holes, intermittent N_ref).

Significance. If the result holds, the work supplies a concrete, observationally grounded mechanism that favors cyclic reformation over large-scale AIC rippling for nearly perpendicular supercritical shocks, thereby clarifying a long-standing debate. Strengths include the careful matching of observed M_A and heta_Bn, the high spatial resolution that resolves sub-d_i Hall fields, the transparent virtual-spacecraft comparison, and the authors’ explicit acknowledgment of residual 2-D/3-D morphological differences. The feedback cycle is diagnosed directly from the simulation fields rather than imposed, and the data products (MMS SDC, Zenodo simulation archive, IRFU-Matlab) are publicly available, supporting reproducibility.

major comments (2)

§3 (virtual-spacecraft analysis) and §4–5: the claim that the reformation cycle “explains most of the observed non-stationarity” rests on qualitative reproduction of E_ni spikes and phase-space holes. Yet the paper itself records clear morphological mismatches (simulated holes are skewed and disconnected; MMS holes are nearly symmetric and connected) and the complete absence of B_n fluctuations that characterize 3-D AIC rippling. A quantitative metric (e.g., fraction of variance in N_ref or E_n accounted for by the reformation cycle versus residual 3-D effects) is needed before the “most” claim can be regarded as established.
Table 1 versus §3: upstream ion eta_i,u = 0.2 is reported for the MMS event, while the simulation is run at eta_i = eta_e = 1. Because the Hall-field strength and the reflected-ion foot thickness both depend on eta, the authors should demonstrate (or cite a parameter scan) that the feedback cycle and the virtual-spacecraft signatures remain robust at the observed eta; otherwise the match may be partly fortuitous.

minor comments (4)

Figure 1 caption and §2: the coordinate system is described as a “modified” n̂, t̂2, t̂1 system with normal pointing downstream; a short explicit definition of the transformation from GSE would help readers reproduce the NIF frame.
§3, first paragraph: “TΩ_ci = 15” mixes roman and italic; consistent notation (e.g., T Ω_ci = 15) throughout would improve readability.
Equation (3): the Hall term is written with an extra factor of 1/e relative to the conventional form; a brief note clarifying the units or the definition of J would avoid confusion.
Availability Statement: the Zenodo DOI is given, but a short statement of the exact simulation snapshot times used for Figures 2–3 would aid exact reproduction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the reformation feedback cycle is diagnosed from independent hybrid simulations matched only to observed MA and heta Bn, not forced by definition or self-citation.

full rationale

The paper’s central claim—that observed ion phase-space holes and localized Hall En spikes arise from a self-regulating Hall-field / reflected-ion-foot cycle spatially organized by 2-D structure—is obtained by direct comparison of MMS data with ab-initio 2-D hybrid simulations (HYPSI, CAM-CL) whose only free parameters are the observed MA o 6 and heta Bn o 89°. The feedback loop itself is read off the simulation fields (contrasting cuts at y = 40 vs y = 25 in Fig. 2; virtual-spacecraft time series in Fig. 3) rather than imposed by construction or fitted. Self-citations (Khotyaintsev et al. 2024 on the same event and on Hall-mediated reflection) supply prior observational context but are not load-bearing for the cycle diagnosis; the simulations stand alone. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or fitted-input-as-prediction appears. Morphological mismatches with 3-D rippling are openly noted by the authors and do not create a circular reduction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard hybrid-plasma modeling assumptions, the observational identification of Hall-dominated En spikes, and the premise that a 2-D out-of-plane-B geometry plus virtual spacecraft is adequate to isolate reformation from rippling. No free parameters are fitted to force the feedback cycle; simulation parameters are chosen to match the observed MA and β. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)

simulation spatial resolution Δx=Δy=0.2 di = 0.2 di
Chosen by hand to resolve sub-di Hall structures; not fitted to data but required for the Eni comparison.
upstream ion and electron beta βi=βe=1 = 1
Set equal and order-unity to produce a supercritical shock comparable to the MMS event (observed βi,u≈0.2); not a free fit of the cycle itself.
injection speed Vin=4.5 vA (MA≃6) = 4.5 vA
Chosen to match the observed Alfvénic Mach number; controls the overall shock strength but is not tuned to produce the feedback cycle.

axioms (4)

domain assumption Hybrid approximation: ions kinetic, electrons massless charge-neutralizing adiabatic fluid (γe=5/3)
Standard for ion-scale shock studies; invoked throughout §3 and required for the Hall term to appear without electron inertia.
ad hoc to paper Two-dimensional geometry with B0 strictly out of the simulation plane eliminates Bn fluctuations and AIC surface rippling
Explicitly chosen so that reformation signatures can be cleanly separated from rippling (Introduction and Discussion); the paper acknowledges this removes a real 3-D process.
domain assumption Normal force balance reduces to Hall + electron-pressure terms (generalized Ohm’s law neglecting electron inertia)
Used to identify Eni spikes as Hall-dominated (Eq. 1 and §2); standard for collisionless shocks at ion scales.
domain assumption Reflected-ion density can be cleanly separated by integrating Vy>0 (simulation) or Vt2>100 km/s (MMS)
Operational definition used to map the foot and to claim densities exceeding nsw; appears in §2 and Fig. 2.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 14855 in / 2957 out tokens · 34611 ms · 2026-07-13T03:21:48.742292+00:00 · methodology

0 comments

read the original abstract

Super-critical collisionless shocks are not static structures but evolve continuously as they reflect incoming ions back upstream. The physical process responsible for this non-stationarity -- whether it is dominated by wave-like corrugation of the shock surface (rippling) or by a cyclic rebuilding of the shock transition (reformation) -- remains debated. We combine Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) observations of a nearly perpendicular ($\theta_{Bn}\approx89^\circ$), supercritical ($M_A\approx6$) bow shock with high-resolution two-dimensional hybrid simulations to address this question. MMS reveals repeated ion phase-space holes and intense, localized Hall electric fields. A virtual-spacecraft analysis of the simulation reproduces these signatures and shows that they arise from a self-regulating feedback cycle: strong Hall-field ion reflection builds a reflected-ion foot, which weakens the Hall field and suppresses further reflection until the foot decays and the cycle restarts. This reformation cycle, spatially organized by the two-dimensional shock structure, explains most of the observed non-stationarity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09389 by Daniel B. Graham, Domenico Trotta, Yuri V. Khotyaintsev.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Overview of the perpendicular shocks observed by MMS. Panels from top to bottom show: (a) magnetic field, (b) ion velocity, (c) normal component of the measured electric field (down-sampled to the cadence of ion measurements), non-ideal field Eni, and ion convection, (d) total density in black and density of reflected ions in red, (e,f) reduced 1D ions velocity distribution functions (VDFs) as a function… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Shock structure in 2D hybrid simulation. Top panels: fraction of reflected ions (black-and-white background) with contours of convection electric field −(Vi × B)x (panel a) and x-component (normal) of the non-ideal electric field Eni (panel f). The panels below show cuts (pink lines in panels a, f) at y = 40 through a dense reflected-ion foot (left) and at y = 25 through an almost foot-free shock transitio… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Observations by the virtual spacecraft (VSC). Panels a-d show the time evolution of the magnetic field magnitude and the location of the virtual spacecraft (pink dot). Panels e-h show VSC observations in the same format as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

[1]

\ Welter, H

biskamp1972 APACrefauthors Biskamp, D. \ Welter, H. APACrefauthors \ 1972 dec . Numerical studies of magnetosonic collisionless shock waves Numerical studies of magnetosonic collisionless shock waves . Nuclear Fusion 12 6 663 . APACrefURL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/12/6/006 APACrefURL APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0029-5515/12/6/006 APACrefDOI

work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/12/6/006 1972
[2]

APACrefauthors \ 1989 05

Burgess1989 APACrefauthors Burgess , D. APACrefauthors \ 1989 05 . Cyclic behavior at quasi-parallel collisionless shocks Cyclic behavior at quasi-parallel collisionless shocks . Geophys. Res. Lett. 16 5 345-348 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/GL016i005p00345 APACrefDOI

work page doi:10.1029/gl016i005p00345 1989
[3]

, Hellinger, P

burgess2016 APACrefauthors Burgess, D. , Hellinger, P. , Gingell, I. \ Trávníček, P M. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Microstructure in two- and three-dimensional hybrid simulations of perpendicular collisionless shocks Microstructure in two- and three-dimensional hybrid simulations of perpendicular collisionless shocks . Journal of Plasma Physics 82 4 905820401...

doi:10.1017/s0022377816000660 2016
[4]

\ Scholer , M

Burgess2007 APACrefauthors Burgess , D. \ Scholer , M. APACrefauthors \ 2007 01 . Shock front instability associated with reflected ions at the perpendicular shock Shock front instability associated with reflected ions at the perpendicular shock . Physics of Plasmas 14 1 012108-012108 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1063/1.2435317 APACrefDOI

work page doi:10.1063/1.2435317 2007
[5]

, Tucker , S

ergun2014 APACrefauthors Ergun , R E. , Tucker , S. , Westfall , J. , Goodrich , K A. , Malaspina , D M. , Summers , D. Cully , C M. APACrefauthors \ 2014 12 . The Axial Double Probe and Fields Signal Processing for the MMS Mission The Axial Double Probe and Fields Signal Processing for the MMS Mission . Space Sci. Rev. . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s11214-014...

doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0115-x 2014
[6]

, Schwartz, S J

johlander2016 APACrefauthors Johlander, A. , Schwartz, S J. , Vaivads, A. , Khotyaintsev, Y V. , Gingell, I. , Peng, I B. Burch, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2016 Oct . Rippled Quasiperpendicular Shock Observed by the Magnetospheric Multiscale Spacecraft Rippled quasiperpendicular shock observed by the magnetospheric multiscale spacecraft . Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 ...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.165101 2016
[7]

, Vaivads, A

johlander2018 APACrefauthors Johlander, A. , Vaivads, A. , Khotyaintsev, Y V. , Gingell, I. , Schwartz, S J. , Giles, B L. Russell, C T. APACrefauthors \ 2018 nov . Shock ripples observed by the MMS spacecraft: ion reflection and dispersive properties Shock ripples observed by the mms spacecraft: ion reflection and dispersive properties . Plasma Physics a...

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aae920 2018
[8]

, Vaivads, A

khotyaintsev_2024_11550091 APACrefauthors Khotyaintsev, Y. , Vaivads, A. , Johansson, E P G. , Nilsson, T. , Karlsson, J. , Graham, D. Lindberg, M. APACrefauthors \ 2024 06 . irfu/irfu-matlab: v1.16.3 [Software]. irfu/irfu-matlab: v1.16.3 [software]. Zenodo . APACrefDOI doi:10.5281/zenodo.11550091 APACrefDOI

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.11550091 2024
[9]

, Graham , D B

khotyaintsev2024_ion_reflection APACrefauthors Khotyaintsev , Y V. , Graham , D B. \ Johlander , A. APACrefauthors \ 2024 11 . Ion Reflection by a Rippled Perpendicular Shock Ion Reflection by a Rippled Perpendicular Shock . Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 21 215201 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.215201 APACrefDOI

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.215201 2024
[10]

, Vaivads , A

khotyaintsev2006 APACrefauthors Khotyaintsev , Y V. , Vaivads , A. , Retin \`o , A. , Andr \'e , M. , Owen , C J. \ Nilsson , H. APACrefauthors \ 2006 11 . Formation of Inner Structure of a Reconnection Separatrix Region Formation of inner structure of a reconnection separatrix region . Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 205003-+ . APACrefURL http://adsabs.harvard.edu/c...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.205003 2006
[11]

\ Savoini , P

lembege1992 APACrefauthors Lembege , B. \ Savoini , P. APACrefauthors \ 1992 11 . Nonstationarity of a two-dimensional quasiperpendicular supercritical collisionless shock by self-reformation Nonstationarity of a two-dimensional quasiperpendicular supercritical collisionless shock by self-reformation . Physics of Fluids B 4 11 3533-3548 . APACrefDOI doi:1...

doi:10.1063/1.860361 1992
[12]

, Olsson , G

lindqvist2014 APACrefauthors Lindqvist , P A. , Olsson , G. , Torbert , R B. , King , B. , Granoff , M. , Rau , D. Tucker , S. APACrefauthors \ 2014 11 . The Spin-Plane Double Probe Electric Field Instrument for MMS The Spin-Plane Double Probe Electric Field Instrument for MMS . Space Sci. Rev. . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0116-9 APACrefDOI

doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0116-9 2014
[13]

, Khotyaintsev , Y V

lotekar2025_occurrence APACrefauthors Lotekar , A. , Khotyaintsev , Y V. , Graham , D B. , Dimmock , A. , Johlander , A. \ Lalti , A. APACrefauthors \ 2025 09 . Occurrence of Non-Stationarity at Earth's Quasi-Perpendicular Bow Shock Occurrence of Non-Stationarity at Earth's Quasi-Perpendicular Bow Shock . Geophys. Res. Lett. 52 17 e2025GL116121 . APACrefD...

work page doi:10.1029/2025gl116121 2025
[14]

\ Burgess , D

Lowe2003 APACrefauthors Lowe , R E. \ Burgess , D. APACrefauthors \ 2003 03 . The properties and causes of rippling in quasi-perpendicular collisionless shock fronts The properties and causes of rippling in quasi-perpendicular collisionless shock fronts . Annales Geophysicae 21 3 671-679 . APACrefDOI doi:10.5194/angeo-21-671-2003 APACrefDOI

work page doi:10.5194/angeo-21-671-2003 2003
[15]

APACrefauthors \ 1994

Matthews1994 APACrefauthors Matthews, A P. APACrefauthors \ 1994 . Current Advance Method and Cyclic Leapfrog for 2D Multispecies Hybrid Plasma Simulations Current advance method and cyclic leapfrog for 2d multispecies hybrid plasma simulations . Journal of Computational Physics 112 1 102-116 . APACrefURL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...

doi:10.1006/jcph.1994.1084 1994
[16]

, Moore , T

pollock2016 APACrefauthors Pollock , C. , Moore , T. , Jacques , A. , Burch , J. , Gliese , U. , Saito , Y. Coffey , V. APACrefauthors \ 2016 Mar . Fast Plasma Investigation for Magnetospheric Multiscale Fast Plasma Investigation for Magnetospheric Multiscale . Space Sci. Rev. 199 1-4 331-406 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s11214-016-0245-4 APACrefDOI

doi:10.1007/s11214-016-0245-4 2016
[17]

APACrefauthors \ 1985 04

Quest1985 APACrefauthors Quest , K B. APACrefauthors \ 1985 04 . Simulations of high-Mach-number collisionless perpendicular shocks in astrophysical plasmas Simulations of high-Mach-number collisionless perpendicular shocks in astrophysical plasmas . Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 16 1872-1874 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1872 APACrefDOI

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.54.1872 1985
[18]

, Anderson , B J

russell2014 APACrefauthors Russell , C T. , Anderson , B J. , Baumjohann , W. , Bromund , K R. , Dearborn , D. , Fischer , D. Richter , I. APACrefauthors \ 2014 08 . The Magnetospheric Multiscale Magnetometers The Magnetospheric Multiscale Magnetometers . Space Sci. Rev. . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0057-3 APACrefDOI

doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0057-3 2014
[19]

, Burgess , D

Trotta2020 APACrefauthors Trotta , D. , Burgess , D. , Prete , G. , Perri , S. \ Zimbardo , G. APACrefauthors \ 2020 01 . Particle transport in hybrid PIC shock simulations: A comparison of diagnostics Particle transport in hybrid PIC shock simulations: A comparison of diagnostics . MNRAS 491 1 580-595 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2760 APACrefDOI

doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2760 2020
[20]

, Pezzi , O

Trotta2023turb APACrefauthors Trotta , D. , Pezzi , O. , Burgess , D. , Preisser , L. , Blanco-Cano , X. , Kajdic , P. Valentini , F. APACrefauthors \ 2023 10 . Three-dimensional modelling of the shock-turbulence interaction Three-dimensional modelling of the shock-turbulence interaction . MNRAS 525 2 1856-1866 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2384 APACrefDOI

doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2384 2023
[21]

, Burgess , D

Vuorinen2026 APACrefauthors Vuorinen , L. , Burgess , D. , Koller , F. \ Trotta , D. APACrefauthors \ 2026 06 . Plasma Stability in Turbulent Magnetic Flux Ropes Downstream of a Collisionless Shock Plasma Stability in Turbulent Magnetic Flux Ropes Downstream of a Collisionless Shock . Geophys. Res. Lett. 53 11 e2026GL122909 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/2026GL...

work page doi:10.1029/2026gl122909 2026
[22]

\ Quest, K B

winske1988 APACrefauthors Winske, D. \ Quest, K B. APACrefauthors \ 1988 . Magnetic field and density fluctuations at perpendicular supercritical collisionless shocks Magnetic field and density fluctuations at perpendicular supercritical collisionless shocks . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 93 A9 9681-9693 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org/...

work page doi:10.1029/ja093ia09p09681 1988

[1] [1]

\ Welter, H

biskamp1972 APACrefauthors Biskamp, D. \ Welter, H. APACrefauthors \ 1972 dec . Numerical studies of magnetosonic collisionless shock waves Numerical studies of magnetosonic collisionless shock waves . Nuclear Fusion 12 6 663 . APACrefURL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/12/6/006 APACrefURL APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0029-5515/12/6/006 APACrefDOI

work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/12/6/006 1972

[2] [2]

APACrefauthors \ 1989 05

Burgess1989 APACrefauthors Burgess , D. APACrefauthors \ 1989 05 . Cyclic behavior at quasi-parallel collisionless shocks Cyclic behavior at quasi-parallel collisionless shocks . Geophys. Res. Lett. 16 5 345-348 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/GL016i005p00345 APACrefDOI

work page doi:10.1029/gl016i005p00345 1989

[3] [3]

, Hellinger, P

burgess2016 APACrefauthors Burgess, D. , Hellinger, P. , Gingell, I. \ Trávníček, P M. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Microstructure in two- and three-dimensional hybrid simulations of perpendicular collisionless shocks Microstructure in two- and three-dimensional hybrid simulations of perpendicular collisionless shocks . Journal of Plasma Physics 82 4 905820401...

doi:10.1017/s0022377816000660 2016

[4] [4]

\ Scholer , M

Burgess2007 APACrefauthors Burgess , D. \ Scholer , M. APACrefauthors \ 2007 01 . Shock front instability associated with reflected ions at the perpendicular shock Shock front instability associated with reflected ions at the perpendicular shock . Physics of Plasmas 14 1 012108-012108 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1063/1.2435317 APACrefDOI

work page doi:10.1063/1.2435317 2007

[5] [5]

, Tucker , S

ergun2014 APACrefauthors Ergun , R E. , Tucker , S. , Westfall , J. , Goodrich , K A. , Malaspina , D M. , Summers , D. Cully , C M. APACrefauthors \ 2014 12 . The Axial Double Probe and Fields Signal Processing for the MMS Mission The Axial Double Probe and Fields Signal Processing for the MMS Mission . Space Sci. Rev. . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s11214-014...

doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0115-x 2014

[6] [6]

, Schwartz, S J

johlander2016 APACrefauthors Johlander, A. , Schwartz, S J. , Vaivads, A. , Khotyaintsev, Y V. , Gingell, I. , Peng, I B. Burch, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2016 Oct . Rippled Quasiperpendicular Shock Observed by the Magnetospheric Multiscale Spacecraft Rippled quasiperpendicular shock observed by the magnetospheric multiscale spacecraft . Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 ...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.165101 2016

[7] [7]

, Vaivads, A

johlander2018 APACrefauthors Johlander, A. , Vaivads, A. , Khotyaintsev, Y V. , Gingell, I. , Schwartz, S J. , Giles, B L. Russell, C T. APACrefauthors \ 2018 nov . Shock ripples observed by the MMS spacecraft: ion reflection and dispersive properties Shock ripples observed by the mms spacecraft: ion reflection and dispersive properties . Plasma Physics a...

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aae920 2018

[8] [8]

, Vaivads, A

khotyaintsev_2024_11550091 APACrefauthors Khotyaintsev, Y. , Vaivads, A. , Johansson, E P G. , Nilsson, T. , Karlsson, J. , Graham, D. Lindberg, M. APACrefauthors \ 2024 06 . irfu/irfu-matlab: v1.16.3 [Software]. irfu/irfu-matlab: v1.16.3 [software]. Zenodo . APACrefDOI doi:10.5281/zenodo.11550091 APACrefDOI

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.11550091 2024

[9] [9]

, Graham , D B

khotyaintsev2024_ion_reflection APACrefauthors Khotyaintsev , Y V. , Graham , D B. \ Johlander , A. APACrefauthors \ 2024 11 . Ion Reflection by a Rippled Perpendicular Shock Ion Reflection by a Rippled Perpendicular Shock . Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 21 215201 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.215201 APACrefDOI

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.215201 2024

[10] [10]

, Vaivads , A

khotyaintsev2006 APACrefauthors Khotyaintsev , Y V. , Vaivads , A. , Retin \`o , A. , Andr \'e , M. , Owen , C J. \ Nilsson , H. APACrefauthors \ 2006 11 . Formation of Inner Structure of a Reconnection Separatrix Region Formation of inner structure of a reconnection separatrix region . Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 205003-+ . APACrefURL http://adsabs.harvard.edu/c...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.205003 2006

[11] [11]

\ Savoini , P

lembege1992 APACrefauthors Lembege , B. \ Savoini , P. APACrefauthors \ 1992 11 . Nonstationarity of a two-dimensional quasiperpendicular supercritical collisionless shock by self-reformation Nonstationarity of a two-dimensional quasiperpendicular supercritical collisionless shock by self-reformation . Physics of Fluids B 4 11 3533-3548 . APACrefDOI doi:1...

doi:10.1063/1.860361 1992

[12] [12]

, Olsson , G

lindqvist2014 APACrefauthors Lindqvist , P A. , Olsson , G. , Torbert , R B. , King , B. , Granoff , M. , Rau , D. Tucker , S. APACrefauthors \ 2014 11 . The Spin-Plane Double Probe Electric Field Instrument for MMS The Spin-Plane Double Probe Electric Field Instrument for MMS . Space Sci. Rev. . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0116-9 APACrefDOI

doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0116-9 2014

[13] [13]

, Khotyaintsev , Y V

lotekar2025_occurrence APACrefauthors Lotekar , A. , Khotyaintsev , Y V. , Graham , D B. , Dimmock , A. , Johlander , A. \ Lalti , A. APACrefauthors \ 2025 09 . Occurrence of Non-Stationarity at Earth's Quasi-Perpendicular Bow Shock Occurrence of Non-Stationarity at Earth's Quasi-Perpendicular Bow Shock . Geophys. Res. Lett. 52 17 e2025GL116121 . APACrefD...

work page doi:10.1029/2025gl116121 2025

[14] [14]

\ Burgess , D

Lowe2003 APACrefauthors Lowe , R E. \ Burgess , D. APACrefauthors \ 2003 03 . The properties and causes of rippling in quasi-perpendicular collisionless shock fronts The properties and causes of rippling in quasi-perpendicular collisionless shock fronts . Annales Geophysicae 21 3 671-679 . APACrefDOI doi:10.5194/angeo-21-671-2003 APACrefDOI

work page doi:10.5194/angeo-21-671-2003 2003

[15] [15]

APACrefauthors \ 1994

Matthews1994 APACrefauthors Matthews, A P. APACrefauthors \ 1994 . Current Advance Method and Cyclic Leapfrog for 2D Multispecies Hybrid Plasma Simulations Current advance method and cyclic leapfrog for 2d multispecies hybrid plasma simulations . Journal of Computational Physics 112 1 102-116 . APACrefURL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...

doi:10.1006/jcph.1994.1084 1994

[16] [16]

, Moore , T

pollock2016 APACrefauthors Pollock , C. , Moore , T. , Jacques , A. , Burch , J. , Gliese , U. , Saito , Y. Coffey , V. APACrefauthors \ 2016 Mar . Fast Plasma Investigation for Magnetospheric Multiscale Fast Plasma Investigation for Magnetospheric Multiscale . Space Sci. Rev. 199 1-4 331-406 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s11214-016-0245-4 APACrefDOI

doi:10.1007/s11214-016-0245-4 2016

[17] [17]

APACrefauthors \ 1985 04

Quest1985 APACrefauthors Quest , K B. APACrefauthors \ 1985 04 . Simulations of high-Mach-number collisionless perpendicular shocks in astrophysical plasmas Simulations of high-Mach-number collisionless perpendicular shocks in astrophysical plasmas . Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 16 1872-1874 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1872 APACrefDOI

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.54.1872 1985

[18] [18]

, Anderson , B J

russell2014 APACrefauthors Russell , C T. , Anderson , B J. , Baumjohann , W. , Bromund , K R. , Dearborn , D. , Fischer , D. Richter , I. APACrefauthors \ 2014 08 . The Magnetospheric Multiscale Magnetometers The Magnetospheric Multiscale Magnetometers . Space Sci. Rev. . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0057-3 APACrefDOI

doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0057-3 2014

[19] [19]

, Burgess , D

Trotta2020 APACrefauthors Trotta , D. , Burgess , D. , Prete , G. , Perri , S. \ Zimbardo , G. APACrefauthors \ 2020 01 . Particle transport in hybrid PIC shock simulations: A comparison of diagnostics Particle transport in hybrid PIC shock simulations: A comparison of diagnostics . MNRAS 491 1 580-595 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2760 APACrefDOI

doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2760 2020

[20] [20]

, Pezzi , O

Trotta2023turb APACrefauthors Trotta , D. , Pezzi , O. , Burgess , D. , Preisser , L. , Blanco-Cano , X. , Kajdic , P. Valentini , F. APACrefauthors \ 2023 10 . Three-dimensional modelling of the shock-turbulence interaction Three-dimensional modelling of the shock-turbulence interaction . MNRAS 525 2 1856-1866 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2384 APACrefDOI

doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2384 2023

[21] [21]

, Burgess , D

Vuorinen2026 APACrefauthors Vuorinen , L. , Burgess , D. , Koller , F. \ Trotta , D. APACrefauthors \ 2026 06 . Plasma Stability in Turbulent Magnetic Flux Ropes Downstream of a Collisionless Shock Plasma Stability in Turbulent Magnetic Flux Ropes Downstream of a Collisionless Shock . Geophys. Res. Lett. 53 11 e2026GL122909 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/2026GL...

work page doi:10.1029/2026gl122909 2026

[22] [22]

\ Quest, K B

winske1988 APACrefauthors Winske, D. \ Quest, K B. APACrefauthors \ 1988 . Magnetic field and density fluctuations at perpendicular supercritical collisionless shocks Magnetic field and density fluctuations at perpendicular supercritical collisionless shocks . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 93 A9 9681-9693 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org/...

work page doi:10.1029/ja093ia09p09681 1988