Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 86 references

Collapsing particles to halo centres turns nonlinear HEFT into a predictive 2-halo model with no free bias parameters.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 02:02 UTC pith:J4DS7K6A

load-bearing objection Clean collapse trick that makes HEFT usable as pure 2-halo templates; the no-free-bias claim is real for the baseline, while the abstract’s best numbers for CIB/HOD rest on a two-parameter effective Laplacian. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09571 v1 pith:J4DS7K6A submitted 2026-07-10 astro-ph.CO

CHEFT: A Hybrid Effective Field Theory halo model

Marcos Pellejero Ib\'a\~nez , David Alonso , John A. Peacock , Matteo Zennaro , Samuel Brieden This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords halo modelHybrid Effective Field TheoryCHEFT2-halo termhalo biaslarge-scale structurepower spectrumprobabilistic bias
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Standard halo models treat the 2-halo term with linear bias times the linear matter power spectrum, and that fails badly on the intermediate scales where 1-halo and 2-halo contributions meet. Pure Hybrid Effective Field Theory captures those nonlinearities but mixes intra-halo structure into the templates, so it cannot be dropped cleanly into the halo-model split. This paper builds collapsed HEFT (CHEFT): the same Lagrangian operators are measured after every particle in a halo is moved to the halo centre, stripping out 1-halo power while keeping the nonlinear inter-halo clustering. Halo bias coefficients as a function of mass come from the probabilistic bias method, so the model has no free bias parameters. On matter it recovers the power spectrum to about a percent across the transition; on mass-weighted tracers that mimic the SZ effect, the CIB, or HOD galaxies it reaches a few percent once a simple effective Laplacian term is restored. The result is a modular halo model that keeps the astrophysical interpretability of profiles and mass functions while using simulation-calibrated nonlinear templates for halo-centre clustering.

Core claim

A collapsed HEFT basis, with particles inside each halo moved to the halo centre before operator spectra are measured, supplies nonlinear templates for the 2-halo term that are free of 1-halo contamination. Combined with mass-dependent Lagrangian bias coefficients taken from probabilistic bias, the construction yields a predictive halo-halo power spectrum with no free bias parameters and recovers the matter power spectrum at the percent level across the 1-halo/2-halo transition; mass-weighted tracers reach ~3–5 % once an effective Laplacian contribution is included.

What carries the argument

Collapsed HEFT (CHEFT): the second-order Lagrangian operator fields of HEFT are rebuilt after every particle belonging to a resolved halo is displaced to that halo’s centre (field particles stay put). The resulting operator auto- and cross-spectra become the templates that multiply the mass-dependent bias coefficients in the 2-halo term.

Load-bearing premise

The finite second-order set of collapsed operators, together with bias coefficients measured at one smoothing scale, is assumed to capture how different halo masses stay coherent with one another; Appendix B shows that even freely fitted biases inside the same basis still fail for widely separated masses.

What would settle it

Measure the full shot-noise-subtracted cross-mass coherence matrix of halo centres in an independent simulation (or at higher resolution) and check whether the CHEFT prediction with fixed probabilistic biases recovers the off-diagonal entries for widely separated mass bins at the few-percent level; persistent large residuals would falsify the claim that the present operator basis is sufficient.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The 1-halo term can be modelled independently with astrophysical profiles while the 2-halo term remains simulation-calibrated and free of free bias parameters.
  • Multi-probe analyses that combine weak lensing or galaxy clustering with SZ, CIB or X-ray maps can use a single coherent description of the transition regime.
  • Emulators of the CHEFT operator spectra and bias functions would turn the method into a cosmology- and redshift-dependent predictive tool.
  • Once the 2-halo accuracy is fixed, the dominant remaining theoretical uncertainty for these observables is the modelling of halo profiles, occupation statistics and their covariances.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the residual cross-mass incoherence is largely stochastic or exclusion-driven, a compact noise model or halo-exclusion counterterm may restore percent-level accuracy without enlarging the deterministic operator basis.
  • The same collapse idea could be applied to higher-order statistics (bispectra, marked power spectra) to keep 1-halo and 2-halo contributions cleanly separated.
  • Because the effective Laplacian calibration appears largely probe-independent in the tests shown, a single mass-dependent correction may suffice for a wide class of mass-weighted observables.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces CHEFT, a hybrid halo-model construction in which the 2-halo term is built from Hybrid EFT operator spectra measured after collapsing particles to halo centres, thereby removing 1-halo contributions from the templates. Halo bias coefficients as a function of mass are taken from an independent probabilistic peak-background-split measurement rather than fitted to the spectra under test, yielding a baseline model (CHEFTmin: operators {1, δ_L, δ_L², s²}) with no free bias parameters. The 1-halo term is measured directly from the simulation so that validation isolates the 2-halo piece. On the matter field the reconstruction reaches percent-level accuracy across the 1-halo/2-halo transition once mild mass-conservation constraints are imposed. For mass-weighted mock tracers (SZ-, CIB- and HOD-like) the baseline model achieves ~5–10% accuracy in power, improving to ~3–5% when an effective Laplacian bias rescaling with two free coefficients is added (CHEFText). Appendix B documents residual failures of the finite operator basis on the off-diagonal structure of P_hh(k|M1,M2).

Significance. If the results hold, CHEFT is a useful and modular advance for multi-probe large-scale structure modelling: it keeps the halo-model separation of profiles, mass weighting and centre clustering while replacing the inaccurate linear 2-halo closure with simulation-calibrated non-linear templates. Strengths that should be credited explicitly include (i) external grounding of bias functions via probabilistic PBS rather than fitting to the power spectra under test, (ii) a clean isolation of the 2-halo contribution by measuring the 1-halo term, (iii) an honest and quantitative Appendix B that falsifies the claim that free bias amplitudes alone restore full cross-mass coherence, and (iv) validation across several astrophysically motivated mass weightings. The approach is well matched to joint analyses of galaxies, SZ, CIB and weak lensing, and the planned emulator path is clearly signposted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, §4.3, App. B5] Abstract and §4.3 / App. B5: The abstract’s stronger ~3–5% accuracy claim for weighted tracers is achieved only by CHEFText, in which the Laplacian bias is replaced by α(M)=c0+c1 log10 M with two coefficients fitted jointly to the same SZ/CIB/HOD auto- and cross-spectra being predicted (Eq. 49; c0=1.036, c1=−0.072). The baseline “no free bias parameters” statement is correct for CHEFTmin, but the abstract and §5 should state more explicitly that the headline few-percent numbers for CIB/HOD include this two-parameter effective correction, and should report the CHEFTmin residuals for those tracers side-by-side so that the pure predictive accuracy is not conflated with the calibrated extension.
  2. [§4.2, Appendix B] §4.2 and Appendix B: Even when bias vectors are freely fitted to Phh(k|M,M) and Phm(k|M) (and even with third-order operators or scale-dependent noise), the reduced χ² on the full Phh(k|M1,M2) matrix remains far from unity, with the largest residuals in cross-correlations of widely separated masses (Figs B1–B3). This is the structural origin of the remaining CIB/HOD errors. The paper correctly identifies the limitation, but the central claim that the second-order collapsed basis “captures a large fraction of the relevant non-linear clustering physics” should be qualified by a quantitative statement that multi-mass tracers remain limited at the few-to-ten-percent level until higher-derivative, exclusion or stochastic terms that restore cross-mass coherence are included.
  3. [§3.1–3.2, Fig. 4] §3.1–3.2 and Fig. 4: Percent-level matter recovery is obtained only after enforcing the mass-conservation integrals I_i^m=0 via a compensating low-mass contribution (Eq. 48). Without that enforcement the reconstruction is at the 2–5% level, and the paper correctly notes that an analogous constraint cannot be imposed model-independently for weighted tracers. The target accuracy floor quoted for SZ/CIB/HOD should therefore be tied to the unconstrained matter residual, not to the constrained one, so that the comparison is fair.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.5] §2.5: The dependence of the CHEFT basis on halo definition and mass resolution is acknowledged but not quantified. A short resolution or FoF-vs-SO comparison (even at fixed volume) would strengthen the claim that the collapse procedure is robust on scales k R_min ≪ 1.
  2. [§2.9] §2.9: Only the z=0 snapshot of a single 512 h⁻¹ Mpc box is used. This is acceptable for a proof-of-concept, but the text should flag more clearly that cosmic-variance and redshift dependence of the CHEFT templates remain untested.
  3. [Fig. 1, §2.5] Fig. 1 caption and §2.5: “most-bound particle” is used as the halo centre; a one-sentence note on sensitivity to centre definition (e.g. centre-of-mass vs most-bound) would help reproducibility.
  4. [§2.5, App. A] Eq. (26) and surrounding text: the mean subtraction ⟨O_i⟩ and the shot-noise subtraction via randomised catalogues are described, but the number of random realisations (stated as 10 only in App. A) should be given in the main methods section.
  5. [§2.5, Fig. 4] Typographical: “there is is a non-zero shot-noise” (§2.5); “Int. Const.” label in Fig. 4 is cryptic; several figure legends use “lin” without defining the linear-bias halo-model curve in the caption.
  6. [§1, §5] References: the Web-Halo Model of Brieden et al. (2026) and related 2-halo improvements (Mead & Verde 2021; Nishimichi et al. 2019) are cited; a one-sentence quantitative comparison of residual accuracy in the transition regime would help place CHEFT relative to those approaches.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Baseline CHEFTmin is a genuine (imperfect) closure test with PBS biases independent of the target spectra; the abstract’s ~3–5% weighted-tracer accuracy is achieved only after a two-parameter Laplacian rescaling fitted to those same spectra.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [§4.3 Eq. (49) and Appendix B5]
    "we define an extended model, CHEFText, in which the Laplacian bias function is replaced by a smooth effective rescaling, b^L_∇²δ(M) → b^eff_∇²δ(M)=α(M)b^{L,s}_∇²δ(M), where … α(M) is taken to be a linear function of log10 M. … We use the simple parametrisation α(M)=c0+c1 log10(M/h^{-1}M_⊙), and determine c0 and c1 by fitting the model jointly to the SZ-, CIB-, and HOD-like mock measurements, including both the auto-spectra and the cross-spectra with matter. This gives c0=1.036, c1=−0.072."

    The two free parameters of the effective Laplacian are calibrated directly on the same weighted auto- and cross-spectra whose improved accuracy (~3–5%) is then reported. The residual mismatch that CHEFTmin leaves for CIB/HOD weights is thereby absorbed by construction; the headline improvement for those tracers is not a pure prediction of the probabilistic-bias CHEFT basis.

full rationale

The load-bearing predictive claim for CHEFTmin is not circular. Mass-dependent Lagrangian coefficients b_i^L(M) are taken from the probabilistic peak-background-split estimator of Stücker et al. (applied to the same simulation but to the distribution of Lagrangian environments, not to the power spectra under test); the CHEFT templates P_ij are measured after collapse; the 1-halo term is measured separately so that the comparison isolates the 2-halo piece. The resulting reconstruction of P_m and of mass-weighted auto/cross spectra is therefore a non-trivial consistency test of a finite operator basis, not a tautology. Appendix B further shows that even freely fitted second- or third-order bias vectors inside the same basis still fail to recover the full off-diagonal structure of P_hh(k|M1,M2), confirming that the residual errors are real. The only clear circular step is the CHEFText extension: the two coefficients of the effective Laplacian rescaling α(M)=c0+c1 log10 M are determined by a joint fit to the identical SZ/CIB/HOD auto- and cross-spectra that are later displayed as reaching ~3–5%. That improvement is therefore partly by construction. Self-citations to overlapping-author HEFT/PBS papers supply the method but do not force the numerical results. Overall circularity is mild and confined to the extended-model accuracy numbers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard halo-model decomposition, the second-order Lagrangian bias expansion of HEFT, the probabilistic peak-background-split bias estimator of Stücker et al., and the empirical collapse procedure that defines the CHEFT templates. Two free parameters appear only in the extended (CHEFText) model; the baseline is intended to be parameter-free once the simulation-calibrated bias functions and operator spectra are fixed. No new physical entities are postulated beyond the operational definition of the collapsed fields.

free parameters (3)
  • c0, c1 (effective Laplacian rescaling) = c0=1.036, c1=-0.072
    Linear function α(M)=c0+c1 log10(M) multiplies the smoothed probabilistic Laplacian bias; jointly fitted to SZ/CIB/HOD auto- and cross-spectra (Appendix B5). Values c0=1.036, c1=-0.072.
  • probabilistic-bias smoothing scale k_PB_s = 0.3 h Mpc^-1
    Sharp-k filter scale used to measure Lagrangian bias coefficients; fixed by hand at 0.3 h Mpc^-1.
  • operator-field smoothing scale k_s = 0.75–1 h Mpc^-1 (fiducial)
    Smoothing applied when constructing CHEFT spectra; varied in Appendix B, fiducial choices 0.75–1 h Mpc^-1.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Halo-model decomposition of any tracer power spectrum into 1-halo + 2-halo terms with mass integration over profiles and halo-centre clustering (Eqs. 8–9).
    Standard framework assumed throughout; not re-derived.
  • domain assumption Second-order Lagrangian bias expansion in operators {1, δ_L, δ_L², s², ∇²δ} is sufficient to describe halo-centre clustering once templates are non-linear (Eq. 18).
    Inherited from HEFT literature; Appendix B shows it is incomplete for cross-mass coherence.
  • domain assumption Probabilistic peak-background-split estimators of Stücker et al. supply the correct mass-dependent Lagrangian bias coefficients without reference to the power spectra under test.
    Used as external input for the predictive baseline model (§2.6).
  • ad hoc to paper Collapsing all particles of a resolved halo to its most-bound particle removes intra-halo correlations while preserving the mass-weighted Lagrangian operator response relevant for the 2-halo term.
    Operational definition of the CHEFT basis (§2.5); justified by construction but resolution- and halo-finder-dependent.
invented entities (1)
  • CHEFT (collapsed HEFT) operator fields and spectra no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide non-linear, 1-halo-free templates for the halo-halo power spectrum inside the halo-model 2-halo integral.
    Defined by the collapse procedure; no independent observational handle outside the same N-body simulations used to measure them.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 34373 in / 3355 out tokens · 36369 ms · 2026-07-13T02:02:55.624413+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a hybrid halo model, which improves the description of the 2-halo term by incorporating non-linear information from simulations. A linear computation of the halo-halo power spectrum is inaccurate at the transition between the 1-halo and 2-halo regimes, whereas nonlinear approaches such as Hybrid Effective Field Theory (HEFT) are not naturally compatible with the halo model decomposition. We address this limitation by constructing a collapsed HEFT (CHEFT) framework, in which the power-spectrum templates of the HEFT operator expansion are measured from simulations where 1-halo contributions are removed by collapsing particles to their halo centres. The halo-halo power spectrum is then expressed as a sum over bias operators, with mass-dependent bias parameters deduced from simulation using the probabilistic bias approach. This provides a predictive model in which there are no free bias parameters. We validate the model for a range of weighting schemes designed to mimic the halo-mass dependence of astrophysical observables, including the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, the Cosmic Infrared Background, and galaxy abundances described via a halo occupation distribution. For the matter field, the model recovers the power spectrum to percent-level accuracy across the transition regime. For weighted tracers, the baseline model achieves accuracies of $\sim 5-10\%$ in power, which improves to the $\sim 3-5\%$ level when including an effective higher-derivative, Laplacian-like contribution in the bias expansion. The CHEFT model thus retains the precision and flexibility of the EFT approach, while allowing the transparent incorporation of astrophysical effects that are directly associated with haloes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09571 by David Alonso, John A. Peacock, Marcos Pellejero Ib\'a\~nez, Matteo Zennaro, Samuel Brieden.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the construction of the collapsed operator fields used in this work. In the standard particle field, correlations include both intra-halo and inter-halo contributions. In the CHEFT construction, all particles belonging to a given halo are displaced to the halo centre, while field particles are left at their Eulerian positions and treated as unresolved objects. The resulting collap… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Halo bias parameters as a function of halo mass measured from the probabilistic bias approach. Circles show the bias functions 𝑏𝑖 (𝑀) obtained from the probabilistic method, while solid lines correspond to the fitting functions of Tinker et al., and to the relations presented in Zennaro et al. (2023). The dashed lines indicate the best-fitting bias parameters obtained from direct fits to the auto-spectra 𝑃… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Per-particle weighting functions 𝑤𝑈 𝑝 = 𝑈¯ (𝑀)𝑚𝑝/𝑀 used to con￾struct the mock observables, shown as a function of halo mass and normalised to their maximum value for visual comparison. These are not the total halo weights 𝑈¯ (𝑀), but the weights assigned to each particle inside a halo of mass 𝑀. Thus, for example, an HOD with 𝑈¯HOD (𝑀) ∝ 𝑀 at high mass corresponds to an approximately constant per-particle… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Validation of the hybrid model on the matter power spectrum. The total power spectrum is reconstructed as the sum of the measured 1-halo term and the CHEFT-based 2-halo contribution. The top panel compares the reconstructed spectra with the simulation measurement, while the lower panels show the ratio residuals R. The blue dashed line shows the standard linear-bias halo model. The red dashed line shows CHE… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Power spectra for SZ-like weighting with different values of the exponent 𝛼. Solid lines show the simulation results, while dashed and dotted lines correspond to the linear halo model and the CHEFT predictions, respectively. The lower panels display the ratio residuals R. The CHEFTmin model significantly improves the description of the transition regime for low values of 𝛼, where the signal receives contri… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05723.x , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05723.x , eprint =

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05723.x 2002

  2. [2]

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x , eprint =

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x 2005

  3. [3]

    arXiv , author =:0910.1234 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913416 , eid =. arXiv , author =:0910.1234 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913416

  4. [4]

    arXiv , author =:1004.2488 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/051 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1004.2488 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/051 2012

  5. [5]

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20510.x , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20510.x , eprint =

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20510.x 2012

  6. [6]

    arXiv , author =:1109.3711 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/75 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1109.3711 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/758/2/75

  7. [7]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sts006 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts006 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sts006

  8. [8]

    arXiv , author =:1301.5901 , journal =

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.123539 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1301.5901 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.123539

  9. [9]

    arXiv , author =:1310.0464 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/057 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1310.0464 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/057 2014

  10. [10]

    arXiv , author =:1311.2168 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/022 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1311.2168 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/022 2014

  11. [11]

    Mapping dark matter in the gamma-ray sky with galaxy catalogs

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.023514 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1312.4403 , journal =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.023514

  12. [12]

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/028 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/028 , eprint =

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/028 2014

  13. [13]

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/11/007 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/11/007 , eprint =

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/11/007 2015

  14. [14]

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/07/030 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/07/030 , eprint =

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/07/030 2015

  15. [15]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2036 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2036 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2036

  16. [16]

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slw098 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slw098 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slw098

  17. [17]

    arXiv , author =:1610.06585 , journal =

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.023528 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1610.06585 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.023528

  18. [18]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx979 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx979 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx979

  19. [19]

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 , eprint =

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 2017

  20. [20]

    arXiv , author =:1807.06209 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1807.06209 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

  21. [21]

    arXiv , author =:1811.09504 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3719 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1811.09504 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3719

  22. [22]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3109 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3109 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3109

  23. [23]

    doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 , eprint =

    Nature Medicine , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 , eprint =

    doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

  24. [24]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3021 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3021 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3021

  25. [25]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa251 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa251 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa251

  26. [26]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3157 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3157 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3157

  27. [27]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1621 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1621 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1621

  28. [28]

    doi:10.1086/149079 , journal =

    doi:10.1086/149079

  29. [29]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2018 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2018 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2018

  30. [30]

    The Effective Halo Model: Creating a Physical and Accurate Model of the Matter Power Spectrum and Cluster Counts

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.123520 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2004.09515 , journal =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.123520 2004

  31. [31]

    A hydrodynamical halo model for weak-lensing cross correlations

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038308 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2005.00009 , journal =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038308 2005

  32. [32]

    arXiv , author =:2006.16329 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038790 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2006.16329 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038790 2006

  33. [33]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab082 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab082 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab082

  34. [34]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab748 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab748 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab748

  35. [35]

    arXiv , author =:2012.09837 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/033 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2012.09837 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/033 2021

  36. [36]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1358 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1358 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1358

  37. [37]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2008 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2008 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2008

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    The bacco simulation project: bacco hybrid Lagrangian bias expansion model in redshift space. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad368 , archivePrefix =. 2207.06437 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stad368

  39. [39]

    arXiv , author =:2103.09820 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/09/020 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2103.09820 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/09/020 2021

  40. [40]

    An Analytic Hybrid Halo + Perturbation Theory Model for Small-scale Correlators: Baryons, Halos, and Galaxies

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/026 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2104.10676 , journal =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/026 2021

  41. [41]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac193 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac193 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac193

  42. [42]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1602 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1602 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1602

  43. [43]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3147 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3147 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3147

  44. [44]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad213 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad213 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad213

  45. [45]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad174 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad174 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad174

  46. [46]

    arXiv , author =:2303.08752 , journal =

    doi:10.21105/astro.2303.08752 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2303.08752 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.21105/astro.2303.08752

  47. [47]

    arXiv , author =:2303.09762 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/07/054 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2303.09762 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/07/054 2023

  48. [48]

    Constraints on dark matter and astrophysics from tomographic $\gamma$-ray cross-correlations

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.103517 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2307.14881 , journal =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.103517

  49. [49]

    X-Ray-Cosmic-Shear Cross-Correlations: First Detection and Constraints on Baryonic Effects

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.051001 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2309.11129 , journal =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.051001

  50. [50]

    Probabilistic Lagrangian bias estimators and the cumulant bias expansion

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451176 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2405.01950 , journal =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451176

  51. [51]

    arXiv , author =:2405.01951 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451178 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2405.01951 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451178

  52. [52]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2319 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2319 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2319

  53. [53]

    arXiv , author =:2410.22397 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adba5b , eid =. arXiv , author =:2410.22397 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adba5b

  54. [54]

    arXiv , author =:2507.03859 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/031 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2507.03859 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/031 2025

  55. [55]

    arXiv , author =:2507.07346 , journal =

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.07346 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2507.07346 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.07346

  56. [56]

    arXiv , author =:2508.10902 , journal =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stag338 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2508.10902 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag338

  57. [57]

    arXiv , author =:2509.17539 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556282 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2509.17539 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556282

  58. [58]

    arXiv , author =:2511.01441 , journal =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stag314 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2511.01441 , journal =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stag314

  59. [59]

    doi:10.1086/304888 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/304888 , eprint =

    doi:10.1086/304888

  60. [60]

    arXiv , author =:1005.2413 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/59 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1005.2413 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/1/59

  61. [61]

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03715.x , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03715.x , eprint =

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03715.x 2000

  62. [62]

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03779.x , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03779.x , eprint =

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03779.x 2000

  63. [63]

    doi:10.1086/319732 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/319732 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1086/319732

  64. [64]

    doi:10.1086/341469 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/341469 , eprint =

    doi:10.1086/341469

  65. [65]

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05889.x , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05889.x , eprint =

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05889.x 2002

  66. [66]

    doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00276-4 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00276-4 , eprint =

    doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00276-4

  67. [67]

    doi:10.1086/466510 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/466510 , eprint =

    doi:10.1086/466510

  68. [68]

    doi:10.1086/432084 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/432084 , eprint =

    doi:10.1086/432084

  69. [69]

    doi:10.1086/164143 , journal =

    doi:10.1086/164143

  70. [70]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/222.1.9P , journal =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/222.1.9p

  71. [71]

    doi:10.1086/184341 , journal =

    doi:10.1086/184341

  72. [72]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/217.4.805 , journal =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/217.4.805

  73. [73]

    Joint constraints on cosmology and the impact of baryon feedback: combining KiDS-1000 lensing with the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect from Planck and ACT

    Joint constraints on cosmology and the impact of baryon feedback: Combining KiDS-1000 lensing with the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect from Planck and ACT. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142197 , archivePrefix =. 2109.04458 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142197

  74. [74]

    Cosmic star formation history with tomographic cosmic infrared background-galaxy cross-correlation

    Cosmic star formation history with tomographic cosmic infrared background-galaxy cross-correlation. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243710 , archivePrefix =. 2204.01649 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243710

  75. [75]

    , keywords =

    Insights on gas thermodynamics from the combination of x-ray and thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich data cross correlated with cosmic shear. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/m77z-w7pl , archivePrefix =. 2412.12081 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.1103/m77z-w7pl

  76. [76]

    , keywords =

    Disentangling the halo: joint model for measurements of the kinetic Sunyaev─Zeldovich effect and galaxy─galaxy lensing. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stag031 , archivePrefix =. 2505.20413 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stag031

  77. [77]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Constraints on cosmology and baryonic feedback with joint analysis of Dark Energy Survey Year 3 lensing data and ACT DR6 thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect observations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.07432 , archivePrefix =. 2506.07432 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.07432

  78. [78]

    Comparison of Halo Model and Simulation Predictions for Projected-Field Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Cross-Correlations

    Comparison of halo model and simulation predictions for projected-field kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich cross-correlations. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/06/004 , archivePrefix =. 2509.03458 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/06/004 2026

  79. [79]

    , keywords =

    Renormalization of Lagrangian bias via spectral parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083541 , archivePrefix =. 1805.05304 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.083541

  80. [80]

    , keywords =

    Simulation budgeting for hybrid effective field theories. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/078 , archivePrefix =. 2510.13962 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/078 2026

Showing first 80 references.