Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 55 references

The Dirac equation in (split-)octonions: origins, variants, and modern context

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review claims that a 2024 split-octonionic Dirac equation is not new: a linear isometry and relabeling make it identical to the 2006 2-factor form.

desk verdict A useful review with an original and apparently correct equivalence check; the main soft spots are an asserted Lagrangian reduction and a multiplication table that is not reproduced. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.09703 v2 pith:ZRTWMDHE submitted 2026-06-21 math-ph math.MPmath.RA

J. Köplinger This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MPmath.RA MSC 17A3515A6681R20
keywords split-octonionshyperbolicoctonionsDiracequationoctonionic2-factorrepresentationstructure-preservingrotationMoufangpropertyLagrangian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a review that organizes octonionic formulations of the Dirac equation into four families: a 2-factor product, a 3-factor sum, a projection method, and the conventional use of octonions to carry Dirac algebra. Its central claim is that a 2024 split-octonionic Dirac equation, presented by its authors as a new representation, reduces to the 2006 2-factor form up to a structure-preserving rotation and a relabeling of basis elements. As a result the two equations share a solution space, and the 2024 Lagrangian is one quarter of the standard Dirac Lagrangian. If correct, this settles the question of novelty: the apparent difference—the presence of a split-octonionic unit J3—is a labeling artifact.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is the non-uniqueness of split-octonion multiplication tables. Because a relabeling and rotation of basis elements can change how an equation looks in print, apparent differences can be spurious. The specific rotation used is the conjugation-like map w ↦ (J3 w) J3, where J3 is a split-octonion unit with J3² = +1; this map is a linear isometry of the quadratic form. The Moufang property (z x)(y z) = (z (x y)) z ensures the rotation preserves the solution space, and a subsequent odd permutation of the imaginary units completes the identification with the 2006 coordinate form.

What would settle it

Recompute the left-multiplication of the 2024 operator by J3 and the right-multiplication of its wave function by J3 using the multiplication table as published in the 2024 paper. If any product sign differs from those used in Appendix A, the coordinate vectors (A.5) and (A.6) will not match the 2006 forms (3.1) and (3.2), falsifying the claimed equivalence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper shows that the 2024 equation, written as (D − J3 m)ψ = 0 with D = I∂t − Σ j_n ∂n, is a 2-factor split-octonionic product. By left-multiplying the operator by J3 and right-multiplying the wave function by J3, the whole equation undergoes the linear isometry w ↦ (J3 w) J3, which preserves the split-octonion norm and, by the Moufang property, carries solutions to solutions. After an orientation-reversing relabeling (an odd permutation of the imaginary triple), the coordinate vectors of the transformed operator and wave function become exactly the 2006 forms. Hence the 2024 equation is the same Dirac system as the 2006 2-factor representation, and the authors' claim of a difference due

Load-bearing premise

The reduction depends on the 2024 paper's multiplication rules being transcribed correctly in Appendix A; a single sign error in any product would break the coordinate match that establishes the equivalence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 2024 split-octonionic Dirac equation is an independent verification of the 2006 2-factor form, not a new representation.
  • The split-octonionic Lagrangian in the 2024 paper is exactly one quarter of the standard Dirac Lagrangian, so its equation of motion is standard.
  • Researchers comparing octonionic Dirac equations must fix the multiplication table and basis convention before claiming novelty.
  • The four-family classification gives a common language for locating and relating future octonionic Dirac constructions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • By the same rotation argument, any 2-factor split-octonionic Dirac equation with derivatives on non-real pairwise-anticommuting units is likely equivalent to the 2006 form up to a norm-preserving rotation, making that form the unique representative of this family.
  • A testable extension: apply the rotation to other proposed split-octonionic Dirac equations (e.g., those with different placements of mass) to determine whether they are truly distinct or further relabelings.
  • If an independent implementation of the 2024 multiplication table yields any sign difference from Appendix A, the claimed equivalence would break; the appendix's transcription is the load-bearing step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reviews formulations of the Dirac equation in (split-)octonions, organizing them into four approaches: 2-factor product, 3-factor barred-operator, projection, and conventional Dirac algebra over octonionic spinors. It treats the 2-factor representation in detail, tracing its origin to the author's 2006 paper, and argues that the 2024 Gogberashvili–Gurchumelia split-octonionic Dirac equation reduces to that 2006 form via the two-sided multiplication w ↦ (J3w)J3 and an orientation-reversing relabeling. Appendix A gives an explicit coordinate reduction and also claims that the 2024 Lagrangian reduces to one quarter of the standard Dirac Lagrangian.

Significance. If the equivalence is correct, the paper makes a meaningful historical/taxonomic claim: the 2024 equation is not a new representation but a coordinate reparametrization of the 2006 construction, and the independent component-wise verification in [GG2024] corroborates the 2006 form. The four-way classification and the cross-reference table of basis conventions are useful. The author discloses his own role in the original work, which is appropriate. The appendix is explicit and the coordinate match (A.5)–(A.6) is transparent given the multiplication rules. However, the reduction is not fully self-contained, and the Lagrangian identification is under-derived.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, Eqs. (A.1)–(A.3)] The reduction uses specific split-octonion products (J3 I = j3, J3 j1 = −J2, J3 j2 = J1, J3 j3 = I, and the right products I J3 = −j3, j1 J3 = J2, j2 J3 = −J1, j3 J3 = −I, J1 J3 = −j2, J2 J3 = j1) justified only by 'using the multiplication rules stated in [GG2024]'. The manuscript does not reproduce that table or cite exact equations. Because the central equivalence between (3.10) and (3.3) rests on these signs, a single sign error would break the coordinate match (A.5)–(A.6). Please include the relevant multiplication table or specific citations so the reduction is independently checkable.
  2. [Appendix A, Eqs. (A.7)–(A.8)] The Lagrangian reduction is asserted without derivation. The identifications ⟨ψ,ψ⟩ = −Ψ̄Ψ and 'J3 supplies the Dirac adjoint' are not demonstrated, and the sign in the former is surprising since ⟨·,·⟩ is the polar form of the norm (so ⟨ψ,ψ⟩ = ∥ψ∥). Please give the explicit component map from ψ to the Dirac spinor Ψ, compute ⟨ψ,ψ⟩ and ⟨J3ψ,Dψ⟩, and verify the factor 1/4. This is load-bearing for the claim that the 2024 Lagrangian equals one quarter of the standard Dirac Lagrangian.
  3. [Section 3.3 / Appendix A] The 'orientation-reversing relabeling' is justified only by the single relation j1j2 = +j3 → j′1 j′2 = −j′3. To establish that the reordered basis is a genuine split-octonion basis, verify the full multiplication table or give a general argument. If the purpose is only the equation equivalence, the coordinate match (A.5)–(A.6) suffices and the basis-legitimacy claim should be softened.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3] The determinant +1 claim for w ↦ (J3w)J3 is stated without proof; add a reference or a one-line argument.
  2. [Abstract] Missing space in 'the2-factor' near the end of the abstract.
  3. [Footnote 3] The corrigendum is cited via a personal webpage and a ResearchGate DOI; consider citing a formal published corrigendum if one exists.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central reduction is checked against an external source's stated multiplication rules; self-citations are contextual, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The main claim is the Appendix A reduction of (3.10) to the 2006 2-factor form. The reduction starts from GG2024's operator and wave function as written in (3.9)-(3.10), and the only algebra input is 'the multiplication rules stated in [GG2024]' (A.1), an external source, not the paper's own target result. No parameter is fitted to data and no quantity is defined in terms of the conclusion it supports; the coordinate match (A.5)-(A.6) is an explicit bijective transformation rather than a renamed fit. The equivalence of the 2006 coordinate form to the standard Dirac system is taken from [Koepl2006] and from GG2024's own component-wise check, both of which are stated with explicit equations and are externally checkable; the fact that one of those sources is by the present author does not make the argument circular under the stated criteria. The Lagrangian identification (A.7)-(A.8) is asserted rather than derived, but that is a verifiability/correctness concern, not a self-referential reduction. Accordingly the paper is not significantly circular; the modest score reflects only the author's self-citations in the historical/origination narrative.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities: the mass is the standard Dirac mass and the bases are taken from prior literature. The derivation rests on standard algebra facts, the external multiplication table of [GG2024], and two imported equivalence claims (computer check and Lagrangian identification).

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Existence and basic properties of split-octonions (composition algebra with quadratic form (1.2)).
    Invoked throughout, cited to Jacobson1958 and Baez2002; no proof in this review.
  • standard math Moufang identity (zx)(yz)=(z(xy))z holds in split-octonions.
    Used in Appendix A equation (A.4) to rotate (D-J3m)ψ; standard for all octonion algebras but not proved here.
  • domain assumption The multiplication rules of [GG2024] are as transcribed in Appendix A.
    The reduction is performed 'using the multiplication rules stated in [GG2024]'; if a product sign is wrong, the coordinate match (A.5)-(A.6) fails.
  • domain assumption The component-wise equivalence of the 2-factor form to the standard Dirac system established in prior work is correct.
    Section 3.3 relies on [GG2024]'s computer-program check and [Koepl2006]'s original derivation; not re-derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper For the Lagrangian reduction, the split-octonion norm equals the Dirac scalar ⟨ψ,ψ⟩=-Ψ̄Ψ and J3 implements the Dirac adjoint.
    Appendix A states these identifications without derivation; they are needed for (A.8).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Dirac equation in (split-)octonions: origins, variants, and modern context." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZRTWMDHE

@misc{pith2026260709703,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Dirac equation in (split-)octonions: origins, variants, and modern context},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZRTWMDHE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.09703}
}
read the original abstract

Octonions and split-octonions have been used to express the Dirac equation in physics in several conceptually distinct ways. This review organizes them into four groups: the 2-factor, 3-factor, and projection representations, which use (split-)octonion basis elements natively to model a spacetime basis, and the conventional use of octonions to carry Dirac algebra acting on spinors. For each group we identify the originating construction, relate later variants to it, and point to modern applications and to recent methods for native split-octonionic analysis. Because the multiplication table of the (split-)octonions is not unique, forms that look different in print can coincide after a structure-preserving rotation and a relabeling of basis elements; we make such relations explicit and tabulate the basis conventions used across the sources. The 2-factor representation is treated in most detail: we document its origin and show that a recently proposed split-octonionic Dirac equation reduces to it up to such a rotation and relabeling, while crediting the independent contributions of that work.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 26 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    J. C. Baez, The Octonions, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 39 (2002), 145-205; arXiv:math/0105155v4 [math.RA] https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0105155

    arXiv 2002

  2. [2]

    Bengtsson, M

    I. Bengtsson, M. Cederwall, Particles, twistors and the division algebras, Nucl. Phys. B 302 (1988), 81-103

    1988

  3. [3]

    J. C. Baez, J. Huerta, ``Division Algebras and Supersymmetry I'' in Superstrings, Geometry, Topology, and C * -algebras , eds. R. Doran, G. Friedman and J. Rosenberg; Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 81 (2010) 65-80; arXiv:0909.0551 [hep-th] https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.0551

    arXiv 2010

  4. [4]

    Beradze, T

    R. Beradze, T. Shengelia, Dirac and Maxwell equations in Split Octonions, arXiv (2016); arXiv:1610.06418 [physics.gen-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.06418

    arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    B. C. Chanyal, P. S. Bisht, O. P. S. Negi, Generalized Split-Octonion Electrodynamics, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50 (2011), 1919--1926

    2011

  6. [6]

    B. C. Chanyal, V. K. Sharma, O. P. S. Negi, Octonionic Gravi-Electromagnetism and Dark Matter, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54 (2015), 3516--3532

    2015

  7. [7]

    K. W. Chung, A. Sudbery, Octonions and the Lorentz and Conformal Groups of Ten-dimensional Space-time, Phys. Lett. B 198 (1987), 161-164

    1987

  8. [8]

    J. H. Conway, D. Smith, On Quaternions and Octonions (2003), A K Peters, Natick, MA

    2003

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Colombo, I

    F. Colombo, I. Sabadini, D. C. Struppa, Dirac Equation in the Octonionic Algebra, in Analysis, Geometry, Number Theory: The Mathematics of Leon Ehrenpreis, eds. E. L. Grinberg, S. Berhanu, M. Knopp, G. Mendoza, E. T. Quinto; Contemporary Math. 251 (2000), 117--134

    2000

  2. [10]

    Candemir, M

    N. Candemir, M. Tan s l , K. \"Ozda s , S. Demir, Hyperbolic Octonionic Proca-Maxwell Equations, Z. Naturforsch. 63a (2008), 15-18

    2008

  3. [11]

    Demir, Hyperbolic Octonion Formulation of Gravitational Field Equations, Int

    S. Demir, Hyperbolic Octonion Formulation of Gravitational Field Equations, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013), 105-116

    2013

  4. [12]

    G. M. Dixon, Division Algebras: Octonions, Quaternions, Complex Numbers and the Algebraic Design of Physics (1994), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    1994

  5. [13]

    De Leo, K

    S. De Leo, K. Abdel-Khalek, Octonionic Quantum Mechanics and Complex Geometry, Prog. Theor. Phys. 96 (1996) 823-831; arXiv:hep-th/9609032 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9609032

    1996 arXiv

  6. [14]

    De Leo, K

    S. De Leo, K. Abdel-Khalek, Octonionic Dirac Equation, Prog. Theor. Phys. 96 (1996) 833-846; arXiv:hep-th/9609033 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9609033

    1996 arXiv

  7. [15]

    T. Dray, C. A. Manogue, Quaternionic Spin, in Clifford Algebras and their Applications in Mathematical Physics, eds. R. Ab amowicz, B. Fauser (Birkh\"auser, Boston, 2000); arXiv:hep-th/9910010 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9910010

    2000 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Demir, M

    S. Demir, M. Tan s l , M. E. Kansu, Generalized Hyperbolic Octonion Formulation for the Fields of Massive Dyons and Gravito-Dyons, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013), 3696-3711

    2013

  9. [17]

    R. Foot, G. C. Joshi, On a certain supersymmetric identity and the division algebras, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 3 (1988), 999-1004

    1988

  10. [18]

    Furey, Unified Theory of Ideals, Phys

    C. Furey, Unified Theory of Ideals, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012), 025024; arXiv:1002.1497 [hep-th] https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.1497

    2012 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Furey, ``Standard model physics from an algebra?'', Ph.D

    C. Furey, ``Standard model physics from an algebra?'', Ph.D. Thesis (2016); arXiv:1611.09182 [hep-th] https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09182

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Furey, A Superalgebra Within: Representations of Lightest Standard Model Particles Form a Z _ 2 ^ 5 -Graded Algebra, Ann

    N. Furey, A Superalgebra Within: Representations of Lightest Standard Model Particles Form a Z _ 2 ^ 5 -Graded Algebra, Ann. Phys. (2025) e00229, DOI: 10.1002/andp.202500229 https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.202500229; arXiv:2505.07923 [hep-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07923

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Gogberashvili, A

    M. Gogberashvili, A. Gurchumelia, Geometry of the Non-Compact G(2), J. Geom. Phys. 144 (2019), 308-313; arXiv:1903.04888 [physics.gen-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.04888

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Gogberashvili, A

    M. Gogberashvili, A. Gurchumelia, Dirac and Maxwell systems in split octonions, J. Appl. Math. Phys. 11 (2023), 1977; arXiv:2012.02255 [math-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.02255

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Gogberashvili, A

    M. Gogberashvili, A. Gurchumelia, Split octonionic Dirac equation, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 21 (2024), 2450214; arXiv:2409.13736 [physics.gen-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13736

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Gogberashvili, Octonionic Electrodynamics, J

    M. Gogberashvili, Octonionic Electrodynamics, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 (2006) 7099-7104; arXiv:hep-th/0512258 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0512258

    2006 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Gogberashvili, Octonionic Version of Dirac Equations, Int

    M. Gogberashvili, Octonionic Version of Dirac Equations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 21 (2006), 3513-3524; arXiv:hep-th/0505101 https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0505101

    2006 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Gogberashvili, Rotations in the space of the split octonions, Adv

    M. Gogberashvili, Rotations in the space of the split octonions, Adv. Math. Phys. 2009 (2009), 483079; arXiv:0808.2496 [math-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.2496

    2009 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Q. Huo, G. Ren, I. Sabadini, Octonionic Para-linear Self-Adjoint Operators and Spectral Decomposition, arXiv (2025); arXiv:2512.04707 [math.FA] https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04707

    2025

  20. [28]

    Jacobson, Composition algebras and their automorphisms, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo 7 (1958), 55-80

    N. Jacobson, Composition algebras and their automorphisms, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo 7 (1958), 55-80

    1958

  21. [29]

    K\"oplinger, V

    J. K\"oplinger, V. Dzhunushaliev, M. Gogberashvili, Emergent Time from Non-Associative Quantum Theory, FQXi essay (2008), https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/307 https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/307; ResearchGate DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10115.99361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1...

    2008

  22. [30]

    K\"oplinger, M

    J. K\"oplinger, M. Habeck, P. Goyal, Operational reconstruction of Feynman rules for quantum amplitudes via composition algebras, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 65 (2026), 128; arXiv:2508.14822 [quant-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14822

    2026 arXiv

  23. [31]

    R. S. Krau har, A. Legatiuk, D. Legatiuk, Discrete octonionic analysis: a unified approach to the split-octonionic and classical settings, arXiv (2025); arXiv:2502.02227 [math.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02227

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    R. S. Krau har, A. Legatiuk, D. Legatiuk, Application of the Weyl Calculus Perspective on Discrete Octonionic Analysis in Bounded Domains, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 19 (2025), 26

    2025

  25. [33]

    K\"oplinger, personal web site (publications, personal versions, talks), http://www.jenskoeplinger.com/P http://www.jenskoeplinger.com/P (retrieved 1 Nov 2025)

    J. K\"oplinger, personal web site (publications, personal versions, talks), http://www.jenskoeplinger.com/P http://www.jenskoeplinger.com/P (retrieved 1 Nov 2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    K\"oplinger, Dirac equation on hyperbolic octonions, Appl

    J. K\"oplinger, Dirac equation on hyperbolic octonions, Appl. Math. Computation, 182 (2006), 443-446; corrigendum in Koepl2007c footnote 2, as well as ResearchGate DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22900.41602 https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22900.41602

    2006

  27. [35]

    K\"oplinger, Gravity and electromagnetism on conic sedenions, Appl

    J. K\"oplinger, Gravity and electromagnetism on conic sedenions, Appl. Math. Computation, 188 (2007), 948-953

    2007

  28. [36]

    J. K\"oplinger, Towards autotopies of normed composition algebras in algebraic Quantum Field Theory, ResearchGate (2023), DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19003.39209 http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19003.39209

    2023

  29. [37]

    K\"oplinger, Phenomenology from Dirac equation with Euclidean-Minkowskian gravity phase , Int

    J. K\"oplinger, Phenomenology from Dirac equation with Euclidean-Minkowskian gravity phase , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 62 (2023), 35; arXiv:2302.10748 [physics.gen-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.10748

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Lasenby, Some recent results for SU(3) and Octonions within the Geometric Algebra approach to the fundamental forces of nature, Math

    A. Lasenby, Some recent results for SU(3) and Octonions within the Geometric Algebra approach to the fundamental forces of nature, Math. Methods Appl. Sci\@. 47 (2024), 1471-1491; arXiv:2202.06733 [physics.gen-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.06733

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Lopatin, On polynomial equations over split-octonions: the arbitrary field case, Comm

    A. Lopatin, On polynomial equations over split-octonions: the arbitrary field case, Comm. Math. 34 (2026), Paper No. 12; arXiv:2601.07332 [math.RA] https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07332

    2026 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Lopatin, A

    A. Lopatin, A. N. Rybalov, On polynomial equations over split octonions, Comm. Math. 33 (2025), Paper No. 8

    2025

  33. [41]

    Lopatin, A

    A. Lopatin, A. N. Zubkov, On linear equations over split-octonions, arXiv (2024); arXiv:2411.08500 [math.RA] https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.08500

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Marques-Bonham, The Dirac equation in a non-Riemannian manifold III: An analysis using the algebra of quaternions and octonions, J

    S. Marques-Bonham, The Dirac equation in a non-Riemannian manifold III: An analysis using the algebra of quaternions and octonions, J. Math. Phys. 32 (1991), 1383-1394

    1991

  35. [43]

    Marques-Bonham, B

    S. Marques-Bonham, B. C. Chanyal, R. Matzner, Yang-Mills-like field theories built on division quaternion and octonion algebras, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135 (2020), 608

    2020

  36. [44]

    C. A. Manogue, T. Dray, Dimensional Reduction, Mod. Phys. Lett. A14 (1999) 99-103; arXiv:hep-th/9807044 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9807044

    1999 arXiv

  37. [45]

    C. A. Manogue, T. Dray, R. A. Wilson, Octions: An E_ 8 description of the Standard Model, J. Math. Phys. 63 (2022), 081703; arXiv:2204.05310 [hep-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.05310

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Mus\`es, Hypernumbers and quantum field theory with a summary of physically applicable hypernumber arithmetics and their geometries, Appl

    C. Mus\`es, Hypernumbers and quantum field theory with a summary of physically applicable hypernumber arithmetics and their geometries, Appl. Math. Comput. 6 (1980), 63-94

    1980

  39. [47]

    Okubo, Introduction to Octonion and Other Non-Associative Algebras in Physics (1995), Cambridge Univ

    S. Okubo, Introduction to Octonion and Other Non-Associative Algebras in Physics (1995), Cambridge Univ. Press

    1995

  40. [48]

    Penney, Octonions and the Dirac equation, Am

    R. Penney, Octonions and the Dirac equation, Am. J. Phys. 36 (1968), 871-873

    1968

  41. [49]

    Penney, Octonions and isospin, Nuovo Cimento B 3 (1971), 95-113

    R. Penney, Octonions and isospin, Nuovo Cimento B 3 (1971), 95-113

    1971

  42. [50]

    Schray, C

    J. Schray, C. Manogue, Octonionic representations of Clifford algebras and triality, Found. Phys. 26 (1996) 17-70; arXiv:hep-th/9407179 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9407179

    1996 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Sudbery, Division algebras, (pseudo)orthogonal groups and spinors, J

    A. Sudbery, Division algebras, (pseudo)orthogonal groups and spinors, J. Phys. A 17 (1984), 939-955

    1984

  44. [52]

    Tan s l , M

    M. Tan s l , M. E. Kansu, S. Demir, A new approach to Lorentz invariance in electromagnetism with hyperbolic octonions, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 127 (2012), 69

    2012

  45. [53]

    Tan s l , M

    M. Tan s l , M. E. Kansu, S. Demir, Reformulation of electromagnetic and gravito-electromagnetic equations for Lorentz system with octonion algebra, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 46 (2014), 1739

    2014

  46. [54]

    J. C. V\'elez Qui\ nones, A unified field theory from a complexified quaternion-octonion Dirac equation, arXiv (2022); arXiv:2205.06657 [physics.gen-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.06657

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Weng, Field equations of electromagnetic and gravitational fields, arXiv (2009); arXiv:0709.2486 [physics.gen-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/0709.2486

    Z. Weng, Field equations of electromagnetic and gravitational fields, arXiv (2009); arXiv:0709.2486 [physics.gen-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/0709.2486

    2009 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.