Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 87 references

Geometric Universality and Thermodynamic Microstructure of Real Fluids in a Unified Entropic Framework

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single entropic scaffold unifies four real-fluid equations of state and turns their geometric curvature into size-independent classifiers of criticality.

desk verdict Solid GTD extension with a usable free-energy scaffold and new size-independent amplitude ratios; the classification claim is only partially demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.10076 v1 pith:LES7FMX7 submitted 2026-07-11 cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MP

Carlos E. Romero-Figueroa , Jose Miguel Ladino , Sasha A. Zaldivar , Hernando Quevedo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP
keywords Geometrothermodynamicsrealfluidsthermodynamicmicrostructurephasetransitionscriticalamplituderatioszero-curvaturecurvescubicequationsofstateBayesianMCMC
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper builds one free-energy template that recovers the van der Waals, Berthelot, Redlich–Kwong and Peng–Robinson equations of state by simple choices of two interaction functions. Once those fluids sit inside the same geometric manifold, the curvature of that manifold tracks phase transitions exactly and vanishes where attractive and repulsive forces balance. Near the critical point every model yields the same mean-field exponent, yet the ratios of the critical amplitudes remain finite, independent of particle number, and arrange real molecules into ordered groups according to how strongly they interact. Bayesian reconstruction of the zero-curvature loci further shows that each equation of state leaves a distinct geometric fingerprint. The result is a practical geometric taxonomy for laboratory fluids that can be read off without fitting the microscopic potential.

What carries the argument

The dimensionless critical-amplitude ratios Q^i_j = A^i_c / A^j_c formed from the three Legendre-invariant GTD metrics. They cancel the logarithmic system-size dependence of the individual amplitudes and thereby supply an intrinsic geometric classifier of criticality.

What would settle it

Compute the same amplitude ratios for a fluid whose second virial coefficient and critical compressibility are known to high precision; if the measured ordering of molecules by Q^i_j fails to match the geometric ranking obtained from experimental a and b parameters, the classification claim is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within a unified entropic representation of real fluids, the dimensionless ratios of critical curvature amplitudes are independent of system size, organize molecular species by the strength of their criticality, and encode universal geometric scaling, while the zero-curvature curves themselves retain model-specific information that Bayesian inference can recover.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the sign of the geometric curvature tells whether microscopic forces are mainly attractive or repulsive, and that zero curvature marks their exact balance.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a unified Helmholtz free-energy representation for real fluids controlled by two functions A(V,N,T) and Θ(T), recovering the van der Waals, Berthelot, Redlich–Kwong, and Peng–Robinson equations of state while preserving Maxwell relations and thermodynamic consistency. Within Geometrothermodynamics it computes the three Legendre-invariant metrics on the equilibrium manifold, shows that curvature singularities track the divergences of CP and κT, and reports a universal near-critical exponent ζ≈1 for all models and metrics. Dimensionless critical-amplitude ratios Qi_j are introduced and claimed to cancel the logarithmic system-size dependence of the individual amplitudes, to organize molecular species by criticality strength, and to serve as classification parameters. Zero-curvature loci of RII are reconstructed numerically and fitted to a power-law form whose parameters are constrained by Bayesian MCMC, with posteriors argued to retain model-specific thermodynamic information.

Significance. If the size-independence and classification power of the Qi_j ratios hold, the work supplies a concrete, experimentally usable geometric diagnostic that goes beyond the usual critical-exponent analysis and could be ported to other homogeneous and quasi-homogeneous systems (including black holes). The unified free-energy construction itself is a clean technical contribution: it places several standard cubic EoS inside a single thermodynamically consistent entropic framework and makes the subsequent GTD calculations systematic. The explicit linkage of GTD curvature denominators to response functions, the consistent ζ=1 result across three metrics, and the reproducible MCMC posteriors for the zero-curvature curves are genuine strengths that strengthen the case for GTD as a practical tool in fluid thermodynamics.

major comments (3)
  1. The central claim that Qi_j are system-size independent (abstract, §IV, Table II, §VI) rests on an asserted exact cancellation of logarithmic N-dependence that is never exhibited. The numerators of the curvatures are declared “too complicated to be written explicitly,” no intermediate expression for Ac(N) is supplied, and Fig. 11 places experimental (a,b) points on curves computed at fixed N=1. Without an explicit demonstration (analytic or numerical) that residual N-dependence is absent over the physical range of a/b used for real molecules, the size-invariance and the molecular-classification interpretation remain unproven, even though the singularity tracking of critical points is unaffected.
  2. The interpretation of R=0 as a state of effective attractive–repulsive force balance, and of the sign of R as encoding interaction character (§III, microstructure diagrams, zero-curvature discussion in §V, abstract), is imported from the Ruppeiner interaction hypothesis and is not re-derived for the three GTD metrics. The manuscript itself cites recent work [85] showing that vanishing thermodynamic curvature need not imply the absence of microscopic interactions. Given that this premise underwrites the force-balance reading of Tzero(V) and part of the classification narrative, the paper should either (i) supply a GTD-specific argument for the hypothesis or (ii) clearly separate the robust singularity results from the more speculative microstructure interpretation.
  3. The power-law ansatz Tzero/TB = A0(V/Vc)^(-γ)+C (§V, Eq. 78) is introduced without theoretical derivation from the curvature condition RII=0. The MCMC analysis shows that the fit is statistically stable and model-discriminating, which is useful, but the claim that the GTD manifold “encodes non-trivial information about the underlying thermodynamical models” then depends on an ad-hoc functional form. A short analytic asymptotic analysis of RII=0 at large V (or an explicit comparison against alternative ansätze) would make this conclusion load-bearing rather than fit-dependent.
minor comments (5)
  1. Peng–Robinson is included in the unified free-energy construction and critical-point formulae but is omitted from the GTD curvature, Qi_j, and zero-curvature analyses “for simplicity.” A brief statement of whether the same ζ=1 and qualitative Qi_j structure survive for PR (even if only numerically) would strengthen the universality claim.
  2. Fig. 7 panels are labeled (a)–(c), (d)–(f)/(g), (h)–(j) inconsistently in the caption versus the body text; several panel letters appear duplicated or skipped. Please renumber for clarity.
  3. Notation for the scalar curvature switches between R, mathcal{R}, and script R across abstract, figures, and text. A single consistent symbol would help.
  4. Table I and the Boyle-temperature discussion are useful but largely standard; a short cross-reference to how TB enters the geometric scale T* of the Qi_j divergences (Table III) earlier in §IV would tighten the narrative.
  5. The phrase “normalized as RII → RII S^3 U^2” in the caption of Fig. 3 is ambiguous; state the precise rescaling factor used for plotting.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: fluid free energies, curvatures, Q ratios and MCMC posteriors are new computations on restated GTD metrics; interaction hypothesis is external (Ruppeiner).

  1. self citation load bearing [§III, Eqs. (44)–(51) and surrounding text]
    "Currently, there exist three Legendre-invariant metrics on T, which are given by [26] GI/II= au… GIII= au…. As in this work we are interested in describing homogeneous thermodynamic systems, we compute the components of the metrics on E by choosing…"

    The three metrics that generate all subsequent RI, RII, RIII (and therefore the Qi_j and zero-curvature curves) are taken as given from the authors’ own prior paper [26]; no independent derivation or external uniqueness proof is supplied inside the present manuscript. The circularity is minor because the metrics are merely the computational tool; the fluid free energies, the explicit curvature denominators (66)–(68), the fitted amplitudes, and the MCMC posteriors are new and do not algebraically reduce to the cited metric definitions.

full rationale

The paper constructs a unified Helmholtz free energy (Eqs. 3, 12) whose special cases of A(V,N,T) and Θ(T) recover the four classical EoS by design (Eqs. 14–17, 20–23); this is an embedding, not a claimed derivation of the EoS from geometry. GTD metrics gI–gIII are restated from the authors’ prior work (Eqs. 44–51, citing [25,26]) and then applied to the new free energies; the resulting scalar curvatures, their singularities (matching CP and κT,N), the near-critical expansion R∼Ac|τ|−ζ with ζ=1, the amplitude ratios Qi_j, the zero-curvature loci Tzero(V), and the Bayesian posteriors on the power-law ansatz are all fresh numerical/algebraic results for these fluids. The interaction hypothesis (sign of R encodes attraction/repulsion) is explicitly attributed to Ruppeiner (external) and is used interpretively, not as a self-derived uniqueness theorem. No step reduces a claimed prediction to its own fitted input or definitional identity; the unshown cancellation of log N in the Qi_j is a transparency gap, not circularity. Score 1 only for the ordinary self-citation of the GTD metric catalogue, which is not load-bearing for the fluid-specific claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on the GTD metric definitions and the interaction hypothesis imported from prior literature, on a mean-field configuration-integral approximation that produces the free-volume term, on the integrability condition that couples A and Θ, and on a postulated power-law form for the zero-curvature locus whose three parameters are fitted by MCMC. The Q ratios themselves are defined quantities, not free parameters, but their interpretation as classification parameters is an invention of the paper without external falsifiable handle beyond the three models examined.

free parameters (2)
  • A0, γ, C (power-law fit of Tzero/TB) = vdW: A0=1.4193±0.0010, γ=1.5658±0.0025, C=0.1872±0.0005; Berthelot and RK analogous (Table VI)
    Three parameters of the ansatz Tzero/TB = A0 (V/Vc)^{-γ} + C are fitted by MCMC for each fluid model; the non-overlapping posteriors are used to claim that GTD retains model-specific information.
  • reference entropy S0 = 0
    Set to zero without loss of generality; enters the free energy and therefore the conformal factors of the GTD metrics.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The three Legendre-invariant GTD metrics gI, gII, gIII correctly encode thermodynamic interactions via their scalar curvatures.
    Taken as given from the authors’ prior GTD program (§III); not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Sign of scalar curvature encodes dominant microscopic interactions (R>0 repulsive, R<0 attractive, R=0 ideal-gas-like balance).
    Interaction hypothesis imported from Ruppeiner geometry and applied throughout §§III–V; recent counter-examples are noted but not resolved.
  • domain assumption Mean-field factorization of the configuration integral QN ≈ (V−Nb)^N exp(−β Uattr) is adequate for the cubic EoS considered.
    Stated in §II; produces the free-volume term that underlies all subsequent free energies.
  • standard math Integrability condition (1+Θ)^2 − T (dΘ/dT) relating A and Θ guarantees thermodynamic consistency of the unified free energy.
    Eq. (11); required so that F = U − TS holds identically.
  • ad hoc to paper Zero-curvature temperature admits a power-law form A0 (V/Vc)^{-γ} + C at large volume.
    Postulated in §V and then fitted; not derived from the EoS or the curvature formula.
invented entities (2)
  • Unified functions A(V,N,T) and Θ(T)
    purpose: Encode attractive interactions and thermal corrections so that four distinct cubic EoS emerge from one free-energy expression.
    Defined in §II; recover known EoS by construction, so they are a convenient reparametrization rather than a new physical mediator.
  • Critical-amplitude ratios Q^i_j
    purpose: Cancel system-size dependence of individual amplitudes and serve as geometric classification parameters for molecular species.
    Introduced in §IV; shown only for three models and experimental a,b tables; no external prediction (e.g., a new measurable critical exponent) is offered.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometric Universality and Thermodynamic Microstructure of Real Fluids in a Unified Entropic Framework." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LES7FMX7

@misc{pith2026260710076,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometric Universality and Thermodynamic Microstructure of Real Fluids in a Unified Entropic Framework},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LES7FMX7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.10076}
}
abstract

We introduce a unified entropic framework for real fluids that encompasses the van der Waals, Berthelot, Redlich Kwong, and Peng Robinson equations of state within a common thermodynamic description. The corresponding microscopic interactions are then explored using Geometrothermodynamics, GTD, through the scalar curvature $mathcal{R}$ of the equilibrium manifold. We show that curvature singularities accurately reproduce macroscopic critical phenomena, while vanishing curvature $\mathcal{R}=0$ identifies specific thermodynamic states where attractive and repulsive intermolecular forces effectively balance. Furthermore, we introduce a set of dimensionless critical-amplitude ratios $Q^i_{j}$, which reveal universal geometric features of the critical regime. Although individual critical amplitudes exhibit a logarithmic dependence on the system size, these invariant ratios organize different molecular species according to the strength of criticality and encode universal scaling features, suggesting their potential as robust classification parameters. Finally, employing Bayesian inference and Markov Chain Monte Carlo, MCMC methods, we statistically reconstruct the zero-curvature curves. The posterior distributions support the consistency of the geometric scaling behavior, demonstrating that the GTD manifold encodes non-trivial information about the underlying thermodynamical models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.10076 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) P–V isotherms of the vdW model for fixed values of N, a, and b, illustrating the evolution of the EoS with temperature T. (b) Maxwell equal-area construction applied to the oscillatory region of the vdW isotherm, replacing the mechanically unstable branch with the coexistence line corresponding to the first-order phase transition. above equations yields the critical volume Vc, given by vdW-like:  ∂ 3A ∂V 3  T,… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Order parameter as a function of T /Tc for the vdW fluid. (b) Phase diagram in the reduced (P/Pc, T /Tc) plane. Finally, using the definition of the critical compressibility factor, Zc = PcVc/N kBTc, we obtain van der Waals: Zc = 3 8 ≈ 0.375, (35) Berthelot: Zc = 3 8 ≈ 0.375, (36) Redlich-Kwong: Zc = 1 3 ≈ 0.333, (37) Peng-Robinson: Zc = χ(χ − 2) − 1 2(χ − 1)2 (1 + χ) ≈ 0.307, (38) showing that Zc is a universal… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. GTD scalar curvature RII versus reduced volume V /Vc for the vdW model under different isobaric regimes relative to Pc (kB = 1, S0 = 0). Panels (a)–(c) show the effect of a and b at fixed N = 10, while (d)–(f) illustrate the dependence on N for a = b = 15. The curvature is normalized as RII → RIIS 3U 2 . 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 V −20 −10 0 10 20 CP Stable Unstable P < Pc P = Pc P > Pc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Heat capacity CP of the vdW model as a function of the volume V for P < Pc, P = Pc, and P > Pc, with fixed parameters a = 0.1, b = 0.2, and N = kB = 1. The heat capacity exhibits the same divergence structure as the scalar curvature, with singularities occurring at…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Microscopic phase diagrams of the vdW model. Stability and metastability regions are shown, with attractive (A−) and repulsive (R−) interactions determined by the sign of RII . The binodal (blue), spinodal (red), and zero-curvature (black) curves are displayed; the red…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Normalized Ricci scalar F 3RII as a function of T for a vdW model with parameters a = 1, b = 0.3, and N = kB = 1. Panels correspond to (a) P = 0.7Pc, (b) P = Pc, and (c) P = 1.1Pc. responding phase structures and isotherms for the Berthelot, Redlich–Kwong, and Peng–Rob…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: GTD scalars for a = b = N = 1, constructed from the Helmholtz free energy at T = 0.95Tc, T = Tc, and T = 1.2Tc. Each panel shows the normalized denominator D/F3 associated with RI , RII , and RIII , together with the corresponding heat capacity. Black dots denote the z…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Log–log plots of the absolute value of the GTD scalar curvature near the critical point as a function of the reduced temperature τ , evaluated at V = Vc. A clear power-law divergence |R| ∼ τ −1 is observed, with the slope encoding the critical exponent. Panels (a)–(c) …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Critical ratios Qi j as functions of the vdW Boyle scale, a/b, for all fluid models. (a) QI II , which exhibits the simplest behavior, characterized by a single divergence. (b) and (c) display qualitatively similar behavior; however, an additional divergence appears in…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Behavior of QI II for (a) the vdW, (b) Berthelot, and (c) Redlich–Kwong models, expressed in terms of their respective Boyle scales. Despite their distinct EoS and microscopic descriptions, all models exhibit the same emergent universal behavior. In all panels, the pa…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Critical ratio QI II for different molecular species within the vdW model. The dashed curves show QI II for different values of b, while the horizontal dotted black line indicates the asymptotic value Q∞ = 3/5. The colored points correspond to various molecular specie…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) RII for the vdW fluid obtained from the free-energy thermodynamic potential, Eq. (62), with a = b = N = kB = 1. Panels (b) and (c) display the corresponding Tzero(V ) profiles. Panel (b) compares the vdW, Berthelot, and Redlich–Kwong fluid models in normalized uni…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Power-law fits of the Tzero(V ) function. (a) van der Waals model. (b) Berthelot model. (c) Redlich–Kwong model. The solid curves correspond to the numerical GTD data, while the dashed black curves represent the best-fit functions of the form Tzero/TB = A0(V /Vc) −γ +…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Posterior corner plots for the Bayesian inference of the GTD scaling law parameters (A0, γ, C) for the (a) vdW, (b) Berthelot, and (c) Redlich–Kwong models. physically admissible parameter ranges, thereby avoiding any strong prior bias in the reconstruc￾tion of the sc…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Posterior distributions of the scaling exponent γ for the vdW, Berthelot, and Redlich–Kwong models. posterior distributions of the scaling exponent γ. The narrow posterior profiles further support the robustness of the scaling behavior. Finally, to quantify the statis…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [85]

    Interacting systems with zero thermodynamic curvature

    Juan Rodrigo and Ian Vega. Interacting systems with zero thermodynamic curvature. Physical Review E, 111(5):054120, 2025

    2025

  2. [1]

    van der Waals

    J.D. van der Waals. Over de continuïteit van den gas- en vloeistoftoestand . Number v. 1 in Over de continuïteit van den gas- en vloeistoftoestand. Sijthoff, 1873

  3. [2]

    Valderrama

    José O. Valderrama. The state of the cubic equations of state. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 42(8):1603–1618, Apr 2003

    2003

  4. [3]

    Sur une méthode purement physique pour la détermination des poids moléculaires des gaz et des poids atomiques de leurs éléments

    Daniel Berthelot. Sur une méthode purement physique pour la détermination des poids moléculaires des gaz et des poids atomiques de leurs éléments. Journal de Physique Théorique et Appliquée, 8(1):263– 274, 1899

  5. [4]

    Poling, John M

    Bruce E. Poling, John M. Prausnitz, and John P. O’Connell. The Properties of Gases and Liquids . McGraw-Hill, New York, 5th edition, 2001

    2001

  6. [5]

    Otto Redlich and J. N. S. Kwong. On the thermodynamics of solutions. V. An equation of state. Fugacities of gaseous solutions. Chemical Reviews, 44(1):233–244, feb 1949

    1949

  7. [6]

    Robinson

    Ding-Yu Peng and Donald B. Robinson. A new two-constant equation of state. Industrial & Engi- neering Chemistry Fundamentals , 15(1):59–64, 1976

    1976

  8. [7]

    S.I. Sandler. Chemical, Biochemical, and Engineering Thermodynamics . Wiley, 2017

    2017

Show all 87 references
  1. [8]

    Trummler, M

    T. Trummler, M. Glatzle, A. Doehring, N. Urban, and M. Klein. Thermodynamic modeling for nu- merical simulations based on the generalized cubic equation of state. Physics of Fluids , 34(11):116126, 11 2022

    2022

  2. [9]

    Nasrifar and M

    Kh. Nasrifar and M. Moshfeghian. A new cubic equation of state for simple fluids: pure and mixture. Fluid Phase Equilibria , 190(1):73–88, 2001

    2001

  3. [10]

    A new cubic equation of state and its applications to the modeling of vapor-liquid equilibria and volumetric properties of natural fluids1 1associate editor: E

    Zhenhao Duan and Jiawen Hu. A new cubic equation of state and its applications to the modeling of vapor-liquid equilibria and volumetric properties of natural fluids1 1associate editor: E. h. oelkers. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta , 68(14):2997–3009, 2004

    2004

  4. [11]

    S.B. Kiselev. Cubic crossover equation of state1contribution of the national institute of standards and technology, not subject to copyright in the united states, november 26, 1997.1. Fluid Phase Equilibria , 31 147(1):7–23, 1998

    1997

  5. [12]

    Chandan Guria and Akhilendra K. Pathak. An improved generalized three-parameter cubic equation of state for pure fluids. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering , 96-97:79–92, 2012

    2012

  6. [13]

    Ashour, R

    I. Ashour, R. Almehaideb, S.-E. Fateen, and G. Aly. Representation of solid-supercritical fluid phase equilibria using cubic equations of state. Fluid Phase Equilibria , 167(1):41–61, 2000

    2000

  7. [14]

    Esmaeilzadeh and M

    F. Esmaeilzadeh and M. Roshanfekr. A new cubic equation of state for reservoir fluids. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 239(1):83–90, 2006

    2006

  8. [15]

    Thermodynamic modeling based on a generalized cubic equation of state for kerosene/lox rocket combustion

    Seong-Ku Kim, Hwan-Seok Choi, and Yongmo Kim. Thermodynamic modeling based on a generalized cubic equation of state for kerosene/lox rocket combustion. Combustion and Flame , 159(3):1351–1365, 2012

    2012

  9. [16]

    Hemanth Kumar and Kenneth E

    K. Hemanth Kumar and Kenneth E. Starling. The most general density-cubic equation of state: application to pure nonpolar fluids. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals , 21(3):255– 262, 1982

    1982

  10. [17]

    K. S. Pedersen, J. Milter, and H. Sørensen. Cubic equations of state applied to ht/hp and highly aromatic fluids. SPE Journal , 9(02):186–192, 2004

    2004

  11. [18]

    Ali and Karar M

    Ali A. Ali and Karar M. Khafeef. Thermodynamic behavior description of a reservoir fluid by using cubic equations of state. Petroleum Chemistry , 64(7):858–865, Jul 2024

    2024

  12. [19]

    Mohsen-Nia, H

    M. Mohsen-Nia, H. Modarress, and G.A. Mansoori. A cubic hard-core equation of state. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 206(1):27–39, 2003

    2003

  13. [20]

    Grazyna Wilczek-Vera and Juan H. Vera. Understanding cubic equations of state: A search for the hidden clues of their success. AIChE Journal , 61(9):2824–2831, 2015

    2015

  14. [21]

    Ya Song Wei and Richard J. Sadus. Equations of state for the calculation of fluid-phase equilibria. AIChE Journal , 46(1):169–196, 2000

    2000

  15. [22]

    O. M. Sokovnin, N. V. Zagoskina, and S. N. Zagoskin. Mathematical models of the state of a real gas. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics , 95(3):806–820, May 2022

    2022

  16. [23]

    Economou

    Ioannis G. Economou. Cubic and generalized van der waals equations of state. In Anthony R. Goodwin, Jan Sengers, and Cor J Peters, editors, Applied Thermodynamics of Fluids . The Royal Society of Chemistry, 11 2010

    2010

  17. [24]

    Geometric model of real gases described by the redlich- kwong-soave equation of state

    Alberto Sánchez and Salvador Villalobos. Geometric model of real gases described by the redlich- kwong-soave equation of state. Journal of Molecular Liquids , 372:121167, 2023

    2023

  18. [25]

    Geometrothermodynamics

    Hernando Quevedo. Geometrothermodynamics. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 48(1):013506, 2007

    2007

  19. [26]

    Unified representation of homogeneous and quasi- homogenous systems in geometrothermodynamics

    Hernando Quevedo and María N Quevedo. Unified representation of homogeneous and quasi- homogenous systems in geometrothermodynamics. Phys. Lett. B , page 137678, 2023

    2023

  20. [27]

    The zeroth law in quasi-homogeneous thermodynamics and black holes

    Alessandro Bravetti, Christine Gruber, Cesar S Lopez-Monsalvo, and Francisco Nettel. The zeroth law in quasi-homogeneous thermodynamics and black holes. Phys. Lett. B , 774:417–424, 2017

    2017

  21. [28]

    Geometrothermodynamics of van der waals systems

    Hernando Quevedo, María N Quevedo, and Alberto Sánchez. Geometrothermodynamics of van der waals systems. Journal of Geometry and Physics , 176:104495, 2022

    2022

  22. [29]

    Phase transitions in ge- ometrothermodynamics

    Hernando Quevedo, Alberto Sánchez, Safia Taj, and Alejandro Vázquez. Phase transitions in ge- ometrothermodynamics. Gen Relativ Gravit , 43:1153–1165, 2011

    2011

  23. [30]

    Geometrothermodynamic description of real gases using the law of corresponding states

    Hernando Quevedo, María N Quevedo, and Alberto Sánchez. Geometrothermodynamic description of real gases using the law of corresponding states. Journal of Geometry and Physics , 185:104727, 2023

    2023

  24. [31]

    Ideal quantum gases: A geometrothermodynamic approach

    Sasha A Zaldivar and Hernando Quevedo. Ideal quantum gases: A geometrothermodynamic approach. 32 Journal of Geometry and Physics , 189:104837, 2023

    2023

  25. [32]

    Geometrothermodynamic description of magnetic materials

    Hernando Quevedo, María N Quevedo, and Alberto Sánchez. Geometrothermodynamic description of magnetic materials. International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics , page 2550204, 2025

    2025

  26. [33]

    Representa- tion invariant geometrothermodynamics: applications to ordinary thermodynamic systems

    Alessandro Bravetti, Cesar S Lopez-Monsalvo, Francisco Nettel, and Hernando Quevedo. Representa- tion invariant geometrothermodynamics: applications to ordinary thermodynamic systems. Journal of Geometry and Physics , 81:1–9, 2014

    2014

  27. [34]

    Geometric description of chemical reactions

    Hernando Quevedo and Diego Tapias. Geometric description of chemical reactions. Journal of Math- ematical Chemistry , 52:141–161, 2014

    2014

  28. [35]

    Hernando Quevedo and María N. Quevedo. Geometrothermodynamic approach in econophysics. In- ternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics , 20(4):2350057, March 2023

    2023

  29. [36]

    Romero-Figueroa and Hernando Quevedo

    Carlos E. Romero-Figueroa and Hernando Quevedo. Quasi-homogeneous thermodynamics and micro- scopic structure of a quantum-corrected flrw universe. Nuclear Physics B , 1029:117529, 2026

    2026

  30. [37]

    Miguel A. S. Pinto, Tiberiu Harko, and Francisco S. N. Lobo. Irreversible geometrothermodynamics of open systems in modified gravity. Entropy, 25(6), 2023

    2023

  31. [38]

    Ex- tending the generalized chaplygin gas model by using geometrothermodynamics

    Alejandro A viles, Aztlán Bastarrachea-Almodovar, Lorena Campuzano, and Hernando Quevedo. Ex- tending the generalized chaplygin gas model by using geometrothermodynamics. Phys. Rev. D , 86:063508, Sep 2012

    2012

  32. [39]

    Benaoum, Orlando Luongo, and Hernando Quevedo

    Hachemi B. Benaoum, Orlando Luongo, and Hernando Quevedo. Extensions of modified Chaplygin gas from Geometrothermodynamics. European Physical Journal C , 79(7):577, July 2019

    2019

  33. [40]

    Quevedo and M

    H. Quevedo and M. N. Quevedo. Cosmological applications of geometrothermodynamics. Gravitation and Cosmology , 20(3):208–213, July 2014

    2014

  34. [41]

    Geometrothermodynamics of asymptotically anti-de sitter black holes

    Hernando Quevedo and Alberto Sanchez. Geometrothermodynamics of asymptotically anti-de sitter black holes. J. High Energ. Phys. , 2008(09):034, 2008

    2008

  35. [42]

    Ladino, Carlos E

    Jose M. Ladino, Carlos E. Romero-Figueroa, and Hernando Quevedo. Phase transitions, shadows, and microstructure of Reissner-Nordström-Anti-de-Sitter black holes from a geometrothermodynamic perspective. Nucl. Phys. B , 1009:116734, 2024

    2024

  36. [43]

    Ladino, Carlos E

    Jose M. Ladino, Carlos E. Romero-Figueroa, and Hernando Quevedo. Phase transitions, shadows, and microstructure of kerr-anti-de sitter black holes from geometrothermodynamics. Nucl. Phys. B , 1018:117031, 2025

    2025

  37. [44]

    Geometrothermodynamics of a charged black hole of string theory

    Alexis Larrañaga and Sindy Mojica. Geometrothermodynamics of a charged black hole of string theory. Brazilian Journal of Physics , 41(2):154–158, Sep 2011

    2011

  38. [45]

    Geodesics in geometrothermodynamics (gtd) type ii geometry of 4d asymptotically anti-de-sitter black holes

    Naba Jyoti Gogoi, Gunindra Mahanta, and Prabwal Phukon. Geodesics in geometrothermodynamics (gtd) type ii geometry of 4d asymptotically anti-de-sitter black holes. The European Physical Journal Plus, 138, 2023

    2023

  39. [46]

    Geometric Thermodynamics of Kerr-AdS black hole with a Cosmological Constant as State Variable

    Alexis Larranaga and Sindi Mojica. Geometric Thermodynamics of Kerr-AdS black hole with a Cosmological Constant as State Variable. Abraham Zelmanov J. , 5:68–77, 2012

    2012

  40. [47]

    Geometrother- modynamics of higher dimensional black holes

    Alessandro Bravetti, Davood Momeni, Ratbay Myrzakulov, and Hernando Quevedo. Geometrother- modynamics of higher dimensional black holes. Gen Relativ Gravit , 45(8):1603–1617, 2013

    2013

  41. [48]

    Akbar, H

    M. Akbar, H. Quevedo, K. Saifullah, A. Sánchez, and S. Taj. Thermodynamic geometry of charged rotating btz black holes. Phys. Rev. D , 83:084031, 2011

    2011

  42. [49]

    Tharanath, Jishnu Suresh, and V

    R. Tharanath, Jishnu Suresh, and V. C. Kuriakose. Phase transitions and geometrothermodynamics 33 of regular black holes. General Relativity and Gravitation , 47(4), March 2015

    2015

  43. [50]

    Corrected thermodynamics and geometrothermodynamics for anti-de sitter black hole

    Ming Zhang. Corrected thermodynamics and geometrothermodynamics for anti-de sitter black hole. Nuclear Physics B , 935:170–182, 2018

    2018

  44. [51]

    On the Scalar-Vector-Tensor Gravity: Black Hole, Ther- modynamics and Geometrothermodynamics

    Phongpichit Channuie and Davood Momeni. On the Scalar-Vector-Tensor Gravity: Black Hole, Ther- modynamics and Geometrothermodynamics. Phys. Lett. B , 785:309–314, 2018

    2018

  45. [52]

    Ghaffari and G

    S. Ghaffari and G. G. Luciano. Black hole thermodynamics in Harada’s inspired theory of gravity: stability, phase structure and geometrothermodynamics. European Physical Journal C, 85(7):785, July 2025

    2025

  46. [53]

    Geometrothermodynamics for black holes and de Sitter space

    Yoshimasa Kurihara. Geometrothermodynamics for black holes and de Sitter space. General Relativity and Gravitation , 50(2):20, February 2018

    2018

  47. [54]

    Geometrothermodynamics of black holes in Lorentz noninvariant massive gravity

    Alberto Sanchez. Geometrothermodynamics of black holes in Lorentz noninvariant massive gravity. Phys. Rev. D , 94(2):024037, 2016

    2016

  48. [55]

    Quevedo, and Alberto Sanchez

    Hernando Quevedo, Maria N. Quevedo, and Alberto Sanchez. Geometrothermodynamics of black hole binary systems. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D , 29(08):2050053, 2020

    2020

  49. [56]

    Geometrothermodynamics of Van der Waals black hole

    Yumin Hu, Juhua Chen, and Yongjiu Wang. Geometrothermodynamics of Van der Waals black hole. General Relativity and Gravitation , 49(12):148, December 2017

    2017

  50. [57]

    Thermodynamics and geometrothermodynamics of regular black hole with nonlinear electrodynamics

    Qiao-Shan Gan, Ju-Hua Chen, and Yong-Jiu Wang. Thermodynamics and geometrothermodynamics of regular black hole with nonlinear electrodynamics. Chinese Physics B , 25(12):120401, 2016

    2016

  51. [58]

    Geometrothermodynamics study of specific black holes in extended Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory using Tsallis entropy

    Abdul Jawad, Maryam Shahid, Shahid Chaudhary, and Sanjar Shaymatov. Geometrothermodynamics study of specific black holes in extended Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory using Tsallis entropy. Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. , 22(8):2550049–1642, January 2025

    2025

  52. [59]

    Sekhmani, G

    Y. Sekhmani, G. G. Luciano, S. K. Maurya, J. Rayimbaev, M. K. Jasim, I. Ibragimov, and S. Muminov. Topological signatures and geometrothermodynamics of critical phenomena in regularized Maxwell black holes. Physics of the Dark Universe , 50:102146, December 2025

    2025

  53. [60]

    Geometrothermodynamics of five dimensional black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-theory

    Safia Taj and Hernando Quevedo. Geometrothermodynamics of five dimensional black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-theory. Gen. Rel. Grav. , 44:1489–1523, 2012

    2012

  54. [61]

    Phase transitions, geometrothermodynamics and critical exponents of black holes with conformal anomaly

    Jie-Xiong Mo and Wen-Biao Liu. Phase transitions, geometrothermodynamics and critical exponents of black holes with conformal anomaly. Adv. High Energy Phys. , 2014:739454, 2014

    2014

  55. [62]

    Geometrothermodynamics of black holes in two dimensions

    Hernando Quevedo and Alberto Sánchez. Geometrothermodynamics of black holes in two dimensions. Physical Review D , 79(8), April 2009

    2009

  56. [63]

    Luciano and A

    G.G. Luciano and A. Sheykhi. Black hole geometrothermodynamics and critical phenomena: A look from tsallis entropy-based perspective. Physics of the Dark Universe , 42:101319, December 2023

    2023

  57. [64]

    G. G. Luciano and E. N. Saridakis. P-v criticalities, phase transitions and geometrothermodynamics of charged ads black holes from kaniadakis statistics. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2023(12), 2023

    2023

  58. [65]

    Impact of barrow entropy on geometrothermody- namics of specific black holes

    Shamaila Rani, Abdul Jawad, and Mazhar Hussain. Impact of barrow entropy on geometrothermody- namics of specific black holes. European Physical Journal C , 83(8):710, August 2023

    2023

  59. [66]

    Geometrothermodynamics of 3D Regular Black Holes

    Nurzada Beissen. Geometrothermodynamics of 3D Regular Black Holes. Entropy, 26(6):457, 2024

    2024

  60. [67]

    Geometrothermodynamics of the kehagias–sfetsos black hole

    W Janke, D A Johnston, and R Kenna. Geometrothermodynamics of the kehagias–sfetsos black hole. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 43(42):425206, October 2010

    2010

  61. [68]

    Quevedo, and Alberto Sánchez

    Hernando Quevedo, María N. Quevedo, and Alberto Sánchez. Geometrothermodynamics of phantom ads black holes. The European Physical Journal C , 76(3), March 2016

    2016

  62. [69]

    Hendi and R

    S.-H. Hendi and R. Naderi. Geometrothermodynamics of black holes in lovelock gravity with a 34 nonlinear electrodynamics. Physical Review D , 91(2), January 2015

    2015

  63. [70]

    Thermodynamics, geometrothermodynamics and critical behavior of (2+1)-dimensional black holes

    YiWen Han and Gang Chen. Thermodynamics, geometrothermodynamics and critical behavior of (2+1)-dimensional black holes. Physics Letters B , 714(2–5):127–130, August 2012

    2012

  64. [71]

    Geometrothermo- dynamics of myers-perry black holes

    Alessandro Bravetti, Davood Momeni, Ratbay Myrzakulov, and Aziza Altaibayeva. Geometrothermo- dynamics of myers-perry black holes. Advances in High Energy Physics , 2013:1–11, 2013

    2013

  65. [72]

    Geometrothermodynamics in Horava-Lifshitz gravity

    Hernando Quevedo, Alberto Sanchez, Safia Taj, and Alejandro Vazquez. Geometrothermodynamics in Horava-Lifshitz gravity. J. Phys. A , 45:055211, 2012

    2012

  66. [73]

    C. L. Ahmed Rizwan, A. Naveena Kumara, K. V. Rajani, Deepak Vaid, and K. M. Ajith. Effect of Dark Energy in Geometrothermodynamics and Phase Transitions of Regular Bardeen AdS Black Hole. Gen. Rel. Grav. , 51(12):161, 2019

    2019

  67. [74]

    Quevedo, and Alberto Sánchez

    Hernando Quevedo, María N. Quevedo, and Alberto Sánchez. Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton phantom black holes: Thermodynamics and geometrothermodynamics. Phys. Rev. D , 94(2):024057, 2016

    2016

  68. [75]

    Romero-Figueroa, and Hernando Quevedo

    Faizuddin Ahmed, Carlos E. Romero-Figueroa, and Hernando Quevedo. Shadow and thermodynamics of deformed schwarzschild-anti-de sitter black hole with a cloud of strings embedded in perfect fluid dark matter. Phys. Dark Universe , 53:102377, 2026

    2026

  69. [76]

    Romero-Figueroa and Hernando Quevedo

    Carlos E. Romero-Figueroa and Hernando Quevedo. Extended thermodynamics and critical behavior of generalized dilatonic lifshitz black holes. Eur. Phys. J. C , 84(10):1091, 2024

    2024

  70. [77]

    Probing black hole thermo- dynamics and microstructure via the shadow of Sagittarius A*

    Jose Miguel Ladino, Carlos E Romero-Figueroa, and Hernando Quevedo. Probing black hole thermo- dynamics and microstructure via the shadow of Sagittarius A*. The European Physical Journal C , 86(7):748, 2026

    2026

  71. [78]

    Quasi-homogeneous black hole thermo- dynamics

    Hernando Quevedo, María N Quevedo, and Alberto Sánchez. Quasi-homogeneous black hole thermo- dynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C , 79:1–11, 2019

    2019

  72. [79]

    Metric geometry of equilibrium thermodynamics

    Frank Weinhold. Metric geometry of equilibrium thermodynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 63(6):2479–2483, 1975

    1975

  73. [80]

    Metric geometry of equilibrium thermodynamics

    F Weinhold. Metric geometry of equilibrium thermodynamics. v. aspects of heterogeneous equilibrium. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 65(2):559–564, 1976

    1976

  74. [81]

    Ruppeiner

    G. Ruppeiner. Thermodynamics: A riemannian geometric model. Phys. Rev. A , 20(4):1608, 1979

    1979

  75. [82]

    Ruppeiner

    G. Ruppeiner. Application of riemannian geometry to the thermodynamics of a simple fluctuating magnetic system. Phys. Rev. A , 24(1):488, 1981

    1981

  76. [83]

    Thermodynamics and an introduction to thermostatistics, 1998

    Herbert B Callen. Thermodynamics and an introduction to thermostatistics, 1998

    1998

  77. [84]

    Ruppeiner

    G. Ruppeiner. Thermodynamic curvature measures interactions. American Journal of Physics , 78(11):1170–1180, 2010

    2010

  78. [86]

    Thermodynamic curvature for attrac- tive and repulsive intermolecular forces

    Helge-Otmar May, Peter Mausbach, and George Ruppeiner. Thermodynamic curvature for attrac- tive and repulsive intermolecular forces. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 88(3):032123, 2013

    2013

  79. [87]

    Johnston

    David C. Johnston. Thermodynamic properties of the van der waals fluid. arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.1205, 2014. 35

    2014 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.