Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Transverse electronic phonons in anomalous Hall crystals mediate a delayed interaction between opposite chiral edges, detectable as a nonlocal response lagging by the phonon flight time.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 12:38 UTC pith:ZYPCOE34

load-bearing objection Solid kinematic result: soft transverse phonons of an AHC can mediate a retarded inter-edge interaction with a clear time-of-flight nonlocal probe; the coupling strength g is only estimated, so detectability is still open. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.10320 v1 pith:ZYPCOE34 submitted 2026-07-11 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Retarded interaction between opposite chiral edges in anomalous Hall crystals

Wangqian Miao , Mu-Yang Chen , Binghai Yan , Chunli Huang This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el
keywords anomalous Hall crystalchiral edge modeselectronic phononsretarded inter-edge interactiontime-dependent Hartree–Fockrhombohedral pentalayer grapheneLuttinger liquid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Anomalous Hall crystals (AHCs) are electronic crystals that also open a Chern gap, so they host both chiral edge modes and soft bulk phonons from broken continuous translation symmetry. The paper argues that this combination produces a dynamical effect ordinary Chern insulators lack: long-wavelength transverse phonons can couple to the edge density through shear strain and thereby mediate a retarded interaction between counterpropagating edges on opposite sides of a strip. Microscopic time-dependent Hartree–Fock calculations for rhombohedral pentalayer graphene show that lowering density softens the transverse phonon; near the continuous transition the boundary-projected phonon continuum crosses the estimated edge dispersion, enabling the hybridization. Integrating out the bulk then yields an effective edge theory that is a Luttinger liquid with instantaneous intra-edge Coulomb terms but delayed inter-edge coupling controlled by the phonon time of flight. A concrete smoking-gun experiment is a nonlocal microwave measurement: drive one edge and look for a response on the opposite edge delayed by W/c_T.

Core claim

In an anomalous Hall crystal the coexistence of chiral edge modes and soft transverse bulk electronic phonons produces a retarded inter-edge interaction: when the edge velocity exceeds the transverse sound speed, an edge excitation can radiate a propagating phonon that crosses the sample and couples to the opposite edge, realizing a Luttinger-liquid variant whose inter-edge kernel carries the phase factor e^{iωW/c_T}.

What carries the argument

The shear-strain bulk–edge coupling S_int = g Σ_η ∫ ρ_η(x,t) u_xy(x,y_η,t), followed by integrating out the retarded bulk phonon propagator to obtain the inter-edge kernel U^R_BT(q_x,ω) that is non-exponentially suppressed precisely when the edge dispersion lies inside the projected transverse-phonon continuum.

Load-bearing premise

The shear coupling between the soft transverse electronic phonon and the edge density must be nonzero and large enough that continuum overlap actually produces a measurable inter-edge signal rather than remaining a kinematic accident.

What would settle it

In a micron-scale AHC strip, apply a microwave drive to one edge contact pair and search for a phase-delayed nonlocal voltage or current on the opposite edge whose delay equals the transverse-phonon flight time W/c_T and that vanishes when density is raised away from the soft-phonon regime or when a pinning potential hardens the mode.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that anomalous Hall crystals (AHCs) host a dynamical signature absent in ordinary Chern insulators: soft transverse electronic phonons mediate a retarded interaction between counterpropagating chiral edge modes on opposite sample edges. Using microscopic Hartree–Fock and time-dependent Hartree–Fock (TDHF/gRPA) calculations for rhombohedral pentalayer graphene, the authors map a phase diagram containing WC, AHC, and hAHC states, show that the long-wavelength transverse phonon softens as density is lowered toward a continuous instability (Figs. 1–2), and demonstrate that the boundary-projected phonon continuum overlaps the estimated chiral edge dispersion near this regime (Fig. 3). Integrating out the bulk transverse mode then yields an inter-edge interaction U_BT^R carrying the phase factor e^{iωW/c_T} (Eqs. 7, 10–12), so that a drive on one edge produces a nonlocal response delayed by the phonon time of flight. The proposed smoking-gun experiment is a four-terminal microwave measurement of this delayed nonlocal signal.

Significance. If the continuum–edge overlap produces a detectable retarded coupling, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable dynamical signature that distinguishes AHCs from conventional Chern insulators and from valley-polarized moiré Chern magnets, where bulk collective modes are symmetry-decoupled from the edge. The microscopic TDHF spectra, density-driven softening, and transparent effective-edge derivation after integrating out the bulk propagator are genuine strengths; the nonlocal time-of-flight prediction is experimentally actionable for micron-scale devices. The result is therefore of clear interest to the rhombohedral-graphene and topological-correlated-electron communities, provided the bulk–edge matrix element is shown to be non-vanishing at the scale needed for detection.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that continuum–edge overlap produces a retarded inter-edge interaction rests on the shear-strain coupling of main-text Eq. (4) being nonzero and of order |g|∼1–10 meV. The SM estimate of g is obtained from a local Bragg-gap potential and an assumed edge width ξ_η∼1 nm, without evaluating the microscopic matrix element between the actual TDHF edge wavefunction and the long-wavelength transverse-phonon eigenvector. If residual pinning, edge localization, or the form factor of the electronic-crystal potential suppresses this matrix element, the residue that yields U_BT^R (Eqs. 7, 10–12) vanishes and the smoking-gun nonlocal response disappears even though the projected spectra still cross. A microscopic evaluation of g (or a controlled lower bound) from the same TDHF eigenvectors used for Figs. 2–3 is needed to convert the kinematic overlap into a quantitative prediction.
  2. Figs. 3(b)–(d) show the projected bulk continuum overlapping an estimated edge dispersion (red line in Fig. 3(a)). The edge velocity is read off by interpolating between occupied and unoccupied Hartree–Fock bands rather than from an explicit strip or open-boundary calculation of the chiral edge mode. Because the resonance condition v > c_T that permits a real transverse momentum ky (and hence a non-evanescent U_BT^R) depends on this velocity, the authors should either compute the edge dispersion microscopically or demonstrate that the qualitative overlap and the existence of a propagating window survive reasonable variations of the estimated velocity.
minor comments (4)
  1. The abstract and introduction state that the continuum “inevitably overlaps” the edge dispersion near the continuous transition. The wording is slightly stronger than the numerical evidence, which shows overlap for the specific densities and pinning strengths of Figs. 3(b)–(d); a brief qualification would avoid overstatement.
  2. Fig. 2 caption and main text refer to “negative values” as imaginary frequencies; a short explicit statement that Im ω < 0 signals dynamical instability would help non-specialist readers.
  3. Notation for the interlayer potential switches between U and D (and DorU in the Fig. 1 caption). Consistent usage would improve readability.
  4. The SM estimation of g assumes ξ_η ∼ 1 nm and O_η of order one; a one-sentence discussion of how residual pinning or gate screening might further reduce g would make the experimental outlook more transparent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: retarded inter-edge coupling is derived by integrating out an independent TDHF phonon propagator; continuum–edge overlap is read from projected spectra, not imposed by construction.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is (i) microscopic TDHF/gRPA spectra for R5G that soften the long-wavelength transverse phonon near the continuous AHC instability (Figs. 2–3), (ii) projection of those eigenvalues onto the strip boundary so that the phonon continuum crosses the estimated chiral edge dispersion, (iii) a symmetry-allowed shear-strain vertex S_int = g ∑_η ∫ ρ_η u_xy that couples bulk displacement to edge density, and (iv) Gaussian integration of the bulk retarded propagator D^R_ij that yields U^R_BT(q_x,ω) with the phase factor e^{iωW/c_T} when the pole lies on the real k_y axis. None of these steps reduces to its own input: the soft-mode frequencies are eigenvalues of the gRPA matrix R(q) built from the HF self-energy, not fitted to the edge response; the continuum overlap is an observation from the projected spectrum, not a definition; the retarded interaction follows from contour integration of an independent bulk Green function; and the order-of-magnitude estimate |g|∼1–10 meV in the SM is an a-posteriori scale check from Bragg gap and edge width, not a parameter fitted to the nonlocal signal and then re-labeled a prediction. Self-citations supply standard TDHF/AHC methodology and do not underwrite the target retarded-coupling claim. The skeptic concern that g may be small is a correctness/detectability issue, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on standard continuum modeling of rhombohedral graphene, the validity of flavor-polarized Hartree–Fock plus TDHF/gRPA for long-wavelength collective modes, and a symmetry-allowed shear-strain coupling of those modes to edge density. Free parameters are conventional material and numerical choices (ε, U, Δ, mesh). No new particles or forces are invented; the AHC itself is taken from the recent literature the paper cites.

free parameters (4)
  • dielectric constant ε = 5
    Fixed to ε=5 throughout; controls interaction strength and therefore phonon softening and phase boundaries.
  • displacement field / interlayer potential U = typically 50 meV in spectra
    Scanned as a control parameter (30–70 meV); phase diagram and soft-mode location depend on its value.
  • pinning potential amplitude Δ = 0–few meV
    External moiré or gate potential used to stabilize or harden phonons; varied to show continuum–edge overlap persists or is suppressed.
  • k-mesh density = 18×18
    18×18 mesh used for all TDHF spectra; finite-size discretization of the mini-Brillouin zone.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Time-dependent Hartree–Fock / generalized RPA reliably restores Goldstone modes and captures long-wavelength phonon softening of the electronic crystal.
    Invoked throughout for collective-mode spectra and instability diagnostics (main text after Eq. 3 and SM TDHF section).
  • domain assumption The continuum k·p Hamiltonian plus layer-resolved screened Coulomb interaction (ε=5, gate distance 10 nm) adequately describes low-energy physics of rhombohedral pentalayer graphene at the densities studied.
    Starting Hamiltonian Eq. (1) and SM tight-binding / interaction sections.
  • ad hoc to paper Shear-strain coupling of the transverse electronic phonon to edge density is symmetry-allowed and of order the Bragg gap times edge width (g∼1–10 meV).
    Introduced in main-text Eq. (4); magnitude estimated only in SM, not computed from a microscopic edge calculation.
  • domain assumption Inter-flavor collective modes remain decoupled from the intra-flavor edge mode, so only the transverse phonon of the majority-flavor crystal couples.
    Used to distinguish AHCs from valley-polarized Chern insulators (Bulk-Edge Coupling section).

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 23464 in / 2956 out tokens · 31866 ms · 2026-07-14T12:38:53.813760+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

An anomalous Hall crystal combines spontaneous electronic crystallization with a Chern insulating gap, supporting both chiral edge modes and low-energy electronic phonons. We show that this coexistence produces a distinct dynamical effect from ordinary Chern insulators: transverse bulk phonons can mediate a retarded interaction between counterpropagating chiral edge modes on opposite sides of the sample, realizing a Luttinger-liquid variant with delayed inter-edge coupling. Using microscopic time-dependent Hartree--Fock calculations for rhombohedral pentalayer graphene, we find that lowering the carrier density softens the long-wavelength transverse phonon mode. Near this instability regime, the resulting boundary-projected phonon continuum inevitably overlaps with the edge dispersion, thereby enabling their coupling. A smoking-gun probe is a nonlocal measurement: a drive applied to one edge can induce a response on the other edge, delayed by the transverse phonon time of flight across the sample.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.10320 by Binghai Yan, Chunli Huang, Mu-Yang Chen, Wangqian Miao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Hartree-Fock phase diagram of rhombohedral pentalayer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: TDHF collective-mode spectrum as a function of carrier density at fixed displacement field. The orange branch denotes the plasmon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Hartree–Fock energies of AHC projected along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Experimental schematic of retarded inter-edge cou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 9 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Wigner, Phys

    E. Wigner, Phys. Rev.46, 1002 (1934)

    1934

  2. [2]

    J. R. Trail, M. D. Towler, and R. J. Needs, Phys. Rev. B68, 045107 (2003)

    2003

  3. [3]

    B78, 245110 (2008)

    B.Bernu,F.Delyon,M.Duneau,andM.Holzmann,Phys.Rev. B78, 245110 (2008)

    2008

  4. [4]

    S. Joy, L. Levitov, and B. Skinner, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 256502 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Kim, Phys

    K.-S. Kim, Phys. Rev. B113, 144434 (2026)

    2026

  6. [6]

    Z.Tešanović,F.m.c.Axel,andB.I.Halperin,Phys.Rev.B39, 8525 (1989)

    1989

  7. [7]

    Dong, Physical Review Letters133(2024)

    J. Dong, Physical Review Letters133(2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Z. Dong, A. S. Patri, and T. Senthil, Physical Review B110, 205130 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  9. [9]

    Y. Zeng, D. Guerci, V. Crépel, A. J. Millis, and J. Cano, Phys- ical Review Letters132, 236601 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  10. [10]

    Soejima, J

    T. Soejima, J. Dong, T. Wang, T. Wang, M. P. Zaletel, A. Vish- wanath, and D. E. Parker, Physical Review B110, 205124 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  11. [11]

    Tan and T

    T. Tan and T. Devakul, Physical Review X14, 041040 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  12. [12]

    Z. Dong, A. S. Patri, and T. Senthil, Physical Review Letters 133, 206502 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  13. [13]

    B.Zhou,H.Yang,andY.-H.Zhang,Phys.Rev.Lett.133,206504 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    A. S. Patri, Z. Dong, and T. Senthil, Phys. Rev. B110, 245115 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    B.ZhouandY.-H.Zhang,PhysicalReviewLetters135,036501 (2025), publisher: American Physical Society

    2025

  16. [16]

    Guo and J

    Z. Guo and J. Liu, Nature Communications16(2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Zeng and A

    Y. Zeng and A. J. Millis, Phys. Rev. X15, 031059 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    Soejima, J

    T. Soejima, J. Dong, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 186505 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    T. Tan, P. J. Ledwith, and T. Devakul, The ideal limit of rhom- bohedral graphene: Interaction-induced layer-skyrmion lattices andtheircollectiveexcitations(2025),arXiv:2511.07402[cond- mat]

    arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Miao and C

    W. Miao and C. Li, Phys. Rev. B113, 155136 (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    T.Uchida,T.Kawakami,andM.Koshino,Phys.Rev.Lett.136, 156602 (2026)

    2026

  22. [22]

    Desrochers, J

    F. Desrochers, J. Huxford, M. R. Hirsbrunner, and Y. B. Kim, Phys. Rev. B113, 045148 (2026)

    2026

  23. [23]

    Z.Lu,T.Han,Y.Yao,A.P.Reddy,J.Yang,J.Seo,K.Watanabe, T.Taniguchi,L.Fu,andL.Ju,Nature626,759(2024),publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2024

  24. [24]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, Z. Hadjri, J. Yang, J. Seo, L. Shi, S. Ye, K.Watanabe,T.Taniguchi,andL.Ju,Nature637,1090(2025), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2025

  25. [25]

    Taniguchi, L

    S.H.Aronson,T.Han,Z.Lu,Y.Yao,J.P.Butler,K.Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Ju, and R. C. Ashoori, Physical Review X15, 031026 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Goldoni and F

    G. Goldoni and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B53, 4591 (1996)

    1996

  27. [27]

    H. Li, Z. Xiang, E. Regan, W. Zhao, R. Sailus, R. Banerjee, T.Taniguchi,K.Watanabe,S.Tongay,A.Zettl,M.F.Crommie, and F. Wang, Nature Nanotechnology19, 618 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    J. Dong, O. E. Sommer, T. Soejima, D. E. Parker, and A. Vish- wanath,ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences122, e2515532122 (2025), publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    2025

  29. [29]

    Jain and C

    A. Jain and C. Huang, Elementary excitations, melting tem- perature and correlation energy in wigner crystal (2025), arXiv:2504.04538

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    M. R. Hirsbrunner, F. Desrochers, J. Huxford, and Y. B. Kim, Topological phonons in anomalous hall crystals (2026), arXiv:2601.06246

    arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Y. H. Kwan, J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, D. K. Efetov, N. Reg- nault, and B. A. Bernevig, Physical Review B112, 075109 (2025), publisher: American Physical Society

    2025

  32. [32]

    Z. Huo, W. Wang, J. Xie, Y. H. Kwan, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z. Zhang, Q. Yang, M. Wu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Liu, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, and X. Lu, Does moire mat- ter? critical moire dependence with quantum fluctuations in graphene based integer and fractional chern insulators (2025), arXiv:2510.15309. 6

    arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    L.Qiao,X.Lu,F.-C.Zhang,andJ.Liu,Chargeimprintingbiases topology of correlated insulator in hbn-aligned rhombohedral multilayer graphene (2026), arXiv:2606.20377

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Nashabeh and H

    L. Nashabeh and H. Ochoa, Lattice relaxation flattens chern bands in rhombohedral graphene stacks (2026), arXiv:2605.16218

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    T. Han, J. P. Butler, S. Ye, Z. Hua, S. Dutta, Z. Hadjri, Z. Wu, J. Yang, J. Seo, P. Pattanakanvijit, E. Aitken, K. Watanabe, T.Taniguchi, P.Xiong, E.Zeldov, Z.Lu, R.Ashoori,and L.Ju, Evidence of metallic wigner crystal in rhombohedral graphene (2026), arXiv:2604.00113

    arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Taniguchi, L

    J.P.Butler,T.Han,A.DiFabbio,Z.Hadjri,E.Aitken,K.Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, L. Ju, and R. C. Ashoori, 1/3 fractional and gaplessintegerquantumanomaloushallstatesinrhombohedral graphene (2026), arXiv:2606.06450

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    D. J. Thouless, Nuclear Physics21, 225 (1960)

    1960

  38. [38]

    Thouless and J

    D. Thouless and J. Valatin, Nuclear Physics31, 211 (1962)

    1962

  39. [39]

    Khalaf, N

    E. Khalaf, N. Bultinck, A. Vishwanath, and M. P. Zaletel, Soft modes in magic angle twisted bilayer graphene (2020), arXiv:2009.14827

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    Y.H.Kwan,Z.Wang,G.Wagner,N.Bultinck,S.H.Simon,and S.A.Parameswaran,Mean-fieldModellingofMoiréMaterials: A User’s Guide with Selected Applications to Twisted Bilayer Graphene (2025), arXiv:2511.21683 [cond-mat]

    arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Y. Shao, H. Shi, and X. Dai, Electromagnetic responses of bi- layer excitonic insulators: from exciton london equations to dipoleandinversedipolehalleffects(2025),arXiv:2509.02142

    arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Chang, C.-X

    C.-Z. Chang, C.-X. Liu, and A. H. MacDonald, Reviews of Modern Physics95, 011002 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Herzog-Arbeitman, Y

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Y. Wang, J. Liu, P. M. Tam, Z. Qi, Y. Jia, D. K. Efetov, O. Vafek, N. Regnault, H. Weng, Q. Wu, B. A. Bernevig, and J. Yu, Physical Review B109, 205122 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  44. [44]

    S. A. A. Ghorashi, A. Dunbrack, A. Abouelkomsan, J. Sun, X. Du, and J. Cano, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 196201 (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    W. Miao, A. Rashidi, and X. Dai, Phys. Rev. B111, 045113 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Liu, and J

    Y.Shi,B.Xie,F.Ren,X.Cai,Z.Guo,Q.Li,X.Lu,N.Regnault, Z. Liu, and J. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 256603 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    retarded interaction between oppo- sitechiraledgesinanomaloushallcrystals

    Supplemental material for “retarded interaction between oppo- sitechiraledgesinanomaloushallcrystals”(2026),seeSupple- mental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher]

    2026

  48. [48]

    Crépel and J

    V. Crépel and J. Cano, Phys. Rev. X15, 011004 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Berry Trashcan

    B. A. Bernevig and Y. H. Kwan, "Berry Trashcan" Model of Interacting Electrons in Rhombohedral Graphene (2025), arXiv:2503.09692 [cond-mat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    B109, 235130 (2024)

    K.-S.Kim,I.Esterlis,C.Murthy,andS.A.Kivelson,Phys.Rev. B109, 235130 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    J. Feng, Z. Han, M. P. Zaletel, and Z. Dong, Self-doped crystal from preempted band-inversion transitions (2026), arXiv:2604.09820

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    J. Dong, T. Soejima, D. E. Parker, and A. Vishwanath, Crys- tals caught doping: Metallic wigner crystals in rhombohedral graphene (2026), arXiv:2604.00114

    arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Soejima, J

    T. Soejima, J. Dong, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Phys- ical Review Letters135, 186505 (2025), publisher: American Physical Society

    2025

  54. [54]

    R.CôtéandA.MacDonald,PhysicalReviewB44,8759(1991)

    1991

  55. [55]

    Desrochers, M

    F. Desrochers, M. R. Hirsbrunner, J. Huxford, A. S. Patri, T. Senthil, and Y. B. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 166503 (2026)

    2026

  56. [56]

    Qin, H.-T

    P. Qin, H.-T. Wu, R. Q. Nguyen, E. Morissette, N. J. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and J. I. A. Li, Extreme anisotropy in the metallic and superconducting phases of rhombohedral hexalayer graphene (2025), arXiv:2504.05129

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Heinonen and S

    O. Heinonen and S. Eggert, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 358 (1996)

    1996

  58. [58]

    Y.H.Kwan,Y.Hu,S.H.Simon,andS.A.Parameswaran,Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 137601 (2021)

    2021

  59. [59]

    T.Wang,T.Devakul,M.P.Zaletel,andL.Fu,Diversemagnetic orders and quantum anomalous hall effect in twisted bilayer mote2 and wse2 (2023), arXiv:2306.02501

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Qiu and F

    W.-X. Qiu and F. Wu, Phys. Rev. B112, 085132 (2025)

    2025

  61. [61]

    M.XieandS.D.Sarma,Collectivespinexcitationsincorrelated moiré chern ferromagnets (2026), arXiv:2603.20370

    arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Giustino, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 015003 (2017)

    F. Giustino, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 015003 (2017)

    2017

  63. [63]

    N. Wei, C. Huang, and A. H. MacDonald, Physical Review Letters126, 117203 (2021). S1 FigureS1. Schematicillustrationofthereal-andreciprocal-spaceconventionsusedinthecalculations. (a)Real-spacemoirélatticegenerated by the primitive vectorsL1 andL 2. (b) Reciprocal-space lattice generated byG1 andG 2, with representative discrete momentum points and the hig...

    2021