Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 72 references

A delay-free higher-order model of time-delayed Kuramoto oscillators predicts and controls synchronization, including bistability and intermediate states, better than pairwise phase-lag approximations.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 09:27 UTC pith:E2CFQBMY

load-bearing objection Clean, usable control design that turns delay-induced bistability into a delay-free higher-order ODE and actually works on the original delayed system for small ετ.

arxiv 2607.10759 v1 pith:E2CFQBMY submitted 2026-07-12 nlin.AO math-phmath.MPnlin.PS

Higher-order interactions for controlling time-delayed Kuramoto model

Narumi Fujii , Martin Moriam\'e , Maxime Lucas , Hiroya Nakao , Timoteo Carletti This is my paper
classification nlin.AO math-phmath.MPnlin.PS
keywords Kuramoto modeltime delayhigher-order interactionssynchronization controlOtt-Antonsen ansatzmean-field feedbackorder parametersecond-order averaging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Oscillator networks with communication delays are hard to control because delays make the equations infinite-dimensional. This paper shows that those delays can be rewritten as ordinary higher-order (three-body) interactions without delay, for small coupling times delay. From that finite-dimensional model the authors extract a single ordinary differential equation for the synchronization level, then design simple mean-field feedback from it. The resulting controllers stabilize full synchrony, incoherence, any intermediate level of synchrony, and bistable regimes in the original delayed system. The higher-order reduction matches direct simulations more closely than the usual first-order pairwise approximation, giving a practical route to design controllers for delayed oscillator networks without solving delay-differential equations.

Core claim

Time-delayed pairwise coupling in the Kuramoto model can be replaced, to second order in coupling strength times delay, by delay-free higher-order interactions. The resulting higher-order model, reduced by the Ott–Antonsen ansatz and second-order averaging, yields a one-dimensional equation for the order parameter whose stability diagram correctly predicts monostable, intermediate, and bistable synchronization states of the original delayed network—states that the conventional pairwise phase-lag approximation cannot capture—and supplies the feedback gains that realize those states in direct simulations.

What carries the argument

The averaged higher-order reduced equation for the order parameter (Eq. 10), obtained by expanding delayed pairwise interactions into effective three-body terms, applying the Ott–Antonsen ansatz, and performing second-order averaging; its fixed-point stability conditions design the linear and nonlinear mean-field feedbacks.

Load-bearing premise

The expansion that turns delays into higher-order couplings stays accurate only when the product of coupling strength and delay is small enough that neglected higher-order terms remain tiny.

What would settle it

Choose feedback gains C and E from the higher-order formula so that an intermediate order-parameter value R_ref is predicted stable; if direct integration of the original delayed Kuramoto equations at moderate ϵτ fails to converge to that R_ref (or fails to show the predicted bistability with full synchrony), the claim is refuted.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Linear mean-field feedback designed from the higher-order reduction creates a bistable window between full synchrony and incoherence that the pairwise reduction never produces.
  • Nonlinear feedback of the form CR(R−E)cosΨ can stabilize any chosen intermediate synchronization level by solving the higher-order reduced equation for C and E.
  • Global prediction error against direct delayed simulations is substantially lower for the higher-order reduced equation than for the pairwise equation across the tested delays.
  • The same gains transfer from the one-dimensional surrogate to the original infinite-dimensional delayed network, realizing the predicted monostable and bistable states.
  • Analysis and controller design for delayed oscillator networks can be performed entirely on a finite-dimensional ordinary differential equation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same delay-to-higher-order substitution could turn other delayed network models (neural masses, power-grid swing equations) into ordinary systems that admit low-dimensional control design.
  • When delay is not small the error concentrates at the edges of bistable regions, suggesting that an adaptive or next-order expansion would restore accuracy for larger ϵτ.
  • Because the surrogate is one-dimensional, real-time optimal or model-predictive control of delayed oscillator ensembles becomes computationally realistic.
  • Observed three-body correlations in real delayed networks may partly be signatures of propagation lag rather than genuine multi-body coupling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a delay-free control framework for the time-delayed Kuramoto model by approximating delayed pairwise interactions as effective higher-order (three-body) interactions for small ετ. After the higher-order expansion (Eq. 2), the Ott–Antonsen ansatz yields a closed equation for the complex order parameter (Eq. 3); second-order averaging then produces a one-dimensional ODE for the averaged order parameter R̄ (Eq. 10). Two mean-field feedback laws are designed from this reduced equation: linear feedback u = CR cos Ψ that stabilizes the incoherent and fully synchronized states (and their bistability), and nonlinear feedback u = CR(R-E) cos Ψ that can stabilize arbitrary intermediate R_ref. Stability diagrams and Global RMSE comparisons against the conventional pairwise (Sakaguchi–Kuramoto) reduction (Eq. 14) are given, and direct simulations of the original delayed system (Eq. 1) confirm that the higher-order design realizes monostable, intermediate, and bistable targets more accurately than the pairwise baseline.

Significance. If the reductions remain faithful, the work supplies a practical, finite-dimensional route to control delayed oscillator networks without solving infinite-dimensional delay equations. The explicit comparison with the pairwise baseline (Tables I–II, Figs. 1–2, 5–6) and the successful realization of intermediate and bistable states that the first-order phase-lag model cannot produce are concrete advances. The derivation chain (higher-order expansion o OA manifold o second-order averaging) is fully written out in Appendix A, and the control constructions follow directly from elementary linearization of the reduced fixed points. The limitation to small ετ is quantified rather than hidden, which strengthens rather than weakens the contribution for the regime in which the method is intended to apply.

minor comments (4)
  1. In Sec. II the control term is written without delay while the interactions carry delay τ; a brief remark on why control delay is neglected (or how it could be included) would clarify the modeling assumptions.
  2. Appendix B and Figs. 5–6 already document the degradation for larger τ; a short sentence in the main text (e.g., near Tables I–II) stating the practical range of ετ for which Global RMSE remains below a chosen threshold would help readers apply the method.
  3. Notation for the averaged variables (R̄, Ψ̄) versus the original (R, Ψ) is introduced carefully in Sec. III but occasionally slips in the figure captions; consistent use would improve readability.
  4. The phase distributions in Figs. 3–4 are informative; adding the corresponding theoretical OA density (or a brief note that it is not available after averaging) would complete the comparison.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Minor self-citation of the higher-order delay approximation from overlapping authors’ prior arXiv; control design, fixed-point analysis, and validation against direct delayed simulations remain independent.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. II, paragraph introducing Eq. (2)]
    "As shown in Ref. 55, the time-delayed interactions in Eq. (1) can be approximated by higher-order interactions for small coupling strength ϵ, yielding the following delay-free Kuramoto model with higher-order interactions…"

    The entire delay-free control framework rests on the higher-order interaction expansion of Ref. 55 (arXiv:2512.16193), whose author list overlaps with the present paper (Fujii, Nakao). While the subsequent OA + averaging reductions and the numerical validation against the original delayed system are independent, the foundational approximation itself is imported by self-citation rather than re-derived here.

full rationale

The paper’s derivation chain begins from the time-delayed Kuramoto model (Eq. 1), replaces the delay by a higher-order interaction expansion taken from Ref. 55 (overlapping authors Fujii & Nakao), then applies the standard Ott–Antonsen ansatz followed by second-order averaging to obtain the closed 1-D order-parameter ODE (Eq. 10). Fixed points and stability boundaries are obtained by elementary algebraic analysis of that ODE; control gains C and E are chosen so that the desired R_ref is a stable fixed point of the reduced equation; the resulting predictions are tested by direct numerical integration of the original infinite-dimensional delayed system and compared with the conventional pairwise (Sakaguchi–Kuramoto) reduction on identical trajectories. No free parameters are fitted to the delayed data and then re-used as “predictions.” The only self-citation that is load-bearing for the framework is the higher-order expansion itself; once that expansion is granted, every subsequent step (OA reduction, averaging, fixed-point design, RMSE comparison) is self-contained and externally falsifiable by simulation of Eq. 1. This matches the pattern of ordinary scientific reuse of prior asymptotic results rather than circular self-definition or fitted-input-as-prediction. Hence a low circularity score of 2 is appropriate.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on three standard mathematical tools (OA ansatz, second-order averaging, small-ϵτ asymptotic expansion) plus the modeling choice of identical oscillators and global all-to-all coupling. Free parameters are only the numerical values chosen for illustration; no data-fitting constants enter the reduced equation. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • coupling strength ϵ = 0.1
    Fixed at 0.1 for all simulations; the approximation order and RMSE depend on the product ϵτ, so the concrete value is a free modeling choice that sets the validity regime.
  • time delay τ = 2.9 / 6.8
    Two illustrative values (2.9 and 6.8) are chosen by hand; larger τ systematically degrades accuracy, confirming it is a free parameter of the numerical study rather than a derived quantity.
  • control gains C, E
    Scanned over grids to produce stability diagrams; they are free design parameters of the feedback laws, not fitted to data.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Ott–Antonsen ansatz closes the infinite hierarchy of Fourier modes for Lorentzian (and, by limit, identical) frequency distributions.
    Invoked in Sec. III to obtain the closed equation (3) for the complex order parameter; standard in the Kuramoto literature but not proved for the higher-order delayed case inside the paper.
  • standard math Second-order averaging eliminates the fast phase Ψ while retaining O(ϵ²) accuracy.
    Applied in Sec. III and fully detailed in Appendix A; relies on the classical averaging theorem for systems with a single fast frequency.
  • ad hoc to paper The product ϵτ is small enough that O(ϵ³τ²) terms may be neglected and the higher-order expansion (2) remains quantitatively accurate.
    Stated in Sec. II; the paper’s own RMSE tables show the assumption fails for the larger delay examined.
  • domain assumption Natural frequencies are identical (or Lorentzian with γ→0⁺) and coupling is global all-to-all.
    Used from Eq. (1) onward to enable the OA reduction; heterogeneous or sparse networks would break the 1-D closure.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 22256 in / 2935 out tokens · 40623 ms · 2026-07-14T09:27:11.321618+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a framework for controlling the collective dynamics of the time-delayed Kuramoto model based on a delay-free, higher-order approximation of the delayed interactions. By applying the Ott--Antonsen ansatz and the second-order averaging method to the resulting higher-order Kuramoto model, we obtain a one-dimensional reduced equation for the order parameter dynamics. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the higher-order approximation predicts the dynamics of the original delayed system more accurately than the conventional pairwise approximation and enables the realization of bistability and intermediate synchronization states. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of higher-order interpretations of time delays for the control of oscillator networks with time-delayed interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.10759 by Hiroya Nakao, Martin Moriam\'e, Maxime Lucas, Narumi Fujii, Timoteo Carletti.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Stability diagrams (a,b) and simulation results (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Stability diagrams (a,b) and simulation results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Bistability of the fully synchronized state and an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Stabilization of the intermediate values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Stability diagrams and simulation results under the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Stability diagrams and simulation results under the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Distribution of RMSE over 15 random initial con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Arthur T. Winfree. The Geometry of Biological Time . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1980

    1980

  2. [2]

    From clocks to chaos: The rhythms of life

    Leon Glass and Michael C Mackey. From clocks to chaos: The rhythms of life . Princeton University Press, 1988

    1988

  3. [3]

    Strogatz and Ian Stewart

    Steven H. Strogatz and Ian Stewart. Coupled oscillators and biological synchronization. Scientific American , 269(6):102--109, 1993

    1993

  4. [4]

    Physics of the human cardiovascular system

    Aneta Stefanovska. Physics of the human cardiovascular system. Contemporary Physics , 40(1):31--55, 1999

    1999

  5. [5]

    Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences

    Arkady Pikovsky, Michael Rosenblum, and Jürgen Kurths. Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences . Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series. Cambridge University Press, 2001

    2001

  6. [6]

    Chemical oscillations, waves, and turbulence

    Yoshiki Kuramoto. Chemical oscillations, waves, and turbulence . Chemistry Series. Dover Publications, 2003. originally published: Springer Berlin, New York, Heidelberg, 1984

    2003

  7. [7]

    Arenas, A

    A. Arenas, A. D \' i az-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou. Synchronization in complex networks . Phys. Rep. , 469(3):93--153, 2008

    2008

  8. [8]

    Bard Ermentrout and David H

    G. Bard Ermentrout and David H. Terman. Mathematical Foundations of Neuroscience . Springer, New York, 2010

    2010

  9. [9]

    Golombek and Ruth E

    Diego A. Golombek and Ruth E. Rosenstein. Physiology of circadian entrainment. Physiological Reviews , 90(3):1063--1102, 2010. PMID: 20664079

    2010

  10. [10]

    Physics of cardiac arrhythmogenesis

    Alain Karma. Physics of cardiac arrhythmogenesis. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics , 4(Volume 4, 2013):313--337, 2013

    2013

  11. [11]

    Self-organized synchronization in decentralized power grids

    Martin Rohden, Andreas Sorge, Marc Timme, and Dirk Witthaut. Self-organized synchronization in decentralized power grids. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 109:064101, Aug 2012

    2012

  12. [12]

    Synchronization in complex oscillator networks and smart grids

    Florian Dörfler, Michael Chertkov, and Francesco Bullo. Synchronization in complex oscillator networks and smart grids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 110(6):2005--2010, 2013

    2005

  13. [13]

    From fireflies to fault-tolerant swarms of robots

    Anders Lyhne Christensen, Rehan OGrady, and Marco Dorigo. From fireflies to fault-tolerant swarms of robots. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation , 13(4):754--766, 2009

    2009

  14. [14]

    Canards for a reduction of the H odgkin- H uxley equations

    Jeff Moehlis. Canards for a reduction of the H odgkin- H uxley equations. Journal of Mathematical Biology , 52:141--153, 2006

    2006

  15. [15]

    Optimal inputs for phase models of spiking neurons

    Jeff Moehlis, Eric Shea-Brown, and Herschel Rabitz. Optimal inputs for phase models of spiking neurons. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics , 1(4):358--367, 06 2006

    2006

  16. [16]

    Desynchronization and inhibition of kuramoto oscillators by scalar mean-field feedback

    Alessio Franci, Antoine Chaillet, Elena Panteley, and Fran c oise Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue. Desynchronization and inhibition of kuramoto oscillators by scalar mean-field feedback. Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems , 24(1):169--217, 2012

    2012

  17. [17]

    Optimal waveform for fast entrainment of weakly forced nonlinear oscillators

    Anatoly Zlotnik, Yifei Chen, Istv \'a n Z Kiss, Hisa-Aki Tanaka, and Jr-Shin Li. Optimal waveform for fast entrainment of weakly forced nonlinear oscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 111(2):024102, 2013

    2013

  18. [18]

    Phase-selective entrainment of nonlinear oscillator ensembles

    Anatoly Zlotnik, Raphael Nagao, István Kiss, and Jr-Shin Li. Phase-selective entrainment of nonlinear oscillator ensembles. Nature Communications , 7:10788, 03 2016

    2016

  19. [19]

    Optimal weighted networks of phase oscillators for synchronization

    Takuma Tanaka and Toshio Aoyagi. Optimal weighted networks of phase oscillators for synchronization. Phys. Rev. E , 78:046210, Oct 2008

    2008

  20. [20]

    Collective phase sensitivity

    Yoji Kawamura, Hiroya Nakao, Kensuke Arai, Hiroshi Kori, and Yoshiki Kuramoto. Collective phase sensitivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 101:024101, Jul 2008

    2008

  21. [21]

    Omel'chenko, and Matthias Wolfrum

    Jan Sieber, Oleh E. Omel'chenko, and Matthias Wolfrum. Controlling unstable chaos: Stabilizing chimera states by feedback. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 112:054102, Feb 2014

    2014

  22. [22]

    Control of coupled oscillator networks with application to microgrid technologies

    Per Sebastian Skardal and Alex Arenas. Control of coupled oscillator networks with application to microgrid technologies. Science Advances , 1(7):e1500339, 2015

    2015

  23. [23]

    Phase reduction and phase-based optimal control for biological systems: a tutorial

    Bharat Monga, Dan Wilson, Tim Matchen, and Jeff Moehlis. Phase reduction and phase-based optimal control for biological systems: a tutorial. Biol. Cybern , 113(1-2):11--46, Apr 2019

    2019

  24. [24]

    Fast optimal entrainment of limit-cycle oscillators by strong periodic inputs via phase-amplitude reduction and floquet theory

    Shohei Takata, Yuzuru Kato, and Hiroya Nakao. Fast optimal entrainment of limit-cycle oscillators by strong periodic inputs via phase-amplitude reduction and floquet theory. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 31(9):093124, 09 2021

    2021

  25. [25]

    Optimization of periodic input waveforms for global entrainment of weakly forced limit-cycle oscillators

    Yuzuru Kato, Anatoly Zlotnik, Jr-Shin Li, and Hiroya Nakao. Optimization of periodic input waveforms for global entrainment of weakly forced limit-cycle oscillators. Nonlinear Dynamics , 105(3):2247--2263, 2021

    2021

  26. [26]

    Feedback-induced desynchronization and oscillation quenching in a population of globally coupled oscillators

    Ayumi Ozawa and Hiroshi Kori. Feedback-induced desynchronization and oscillation quenching in a population of globally coupled oscillators. Phys. Rev. E , 103:062217, Jun 2021

    2021

  27. [27]

    Optimal control of velocity and nonlocal interactions in the mean-field kuramoto model

    Carlo Sinigaglia, Francesco Braghin, and Spring Berman. Optimal control of velocity and nonlocal interactions in the mean-field kuramoto model. In 2022 American Control Conference (ACC) , pages 290--295, 2022

    2022

  28. [28]

    Phase-amplitude reduction and optimal phase locking of collectively oscillating networks

    Petar Mircheski, Jinjie Zhu, and Hiroya Nakao. Phase-amplitude reduction and optimal phase locking of collectively oscillating networks. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 33(10):103111, 10 2023

    2023

  29. [29]

    Phase autoencoder for limit-cycle oscillators

    Koichiro Yawata, Kai Fukami, Kunihiko Taira, and Hiroya Nakao. Phase autoencoder for limit-cycle oscillators. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 34(6):063111, 06 2024

    2024

  30. [30]

    Optimal phase-based control of strongly perturbed limit cycle oscillators using phase reduction techniques

    Adharaa Neelim Dewanjee and Dan Wilson. Optimal phase-based control of strongly perturbed limit cycle oscillators using phase reduction techniques. Phys. Rev. E , 109:024223, Feb 2024

    2024

  31. [31]

    Optimal coupling functions for fast and global synchronization of weakly coupled limit-cycle oscillators

    Norihisa Namura and Hiroya Nakao. Optimal coupling functions for fast and global synchronization of weakly coupled limit-cycle oscillators. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , 185:115080, 2024

    2024

  32. [32]

    Optimal phase control of limit-cycle oscillators with strong inputs through phase-amplitude reduction

    Norihisa Namura and Hiroya Nakao. Optimal phase control of limit-cycle oscillators with strong inputs through phase-amplitude reduction. In 2024 IEEE 63rd Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) , pages 4003--4009, 2024

    2024

  33. [33]

    Hamiltonian control to desynchronize kuramoto oscillators with higher-order interactions

    Martin Moriam\'e, Maxime Lucas, and Timoteo Carletti. Hamiltonian control to desynchronize kuramoto oscillators with higher-order interactions. Phys. Rev. E , 111:044307, Apr 2025

    2025

  34. [34]

    G. B. Ermentrout and N. Kopell. Fine structure of neural spiking and synchronization in the presence of conduction delays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 95(3):1259--1264, 1998

    1998

  35. [35]

    Tilmann Heil, Ingo Fischer, Wolfgang Els\"asser, Josep Mulet, and Claudio R. Mirasso. Chaos synchronization and spontaneous symmetry-breaking in symmetrically delay-coupled semiconductor lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 86:795--798, Jan 2001

    2001

  36. [36]

    Izhikevich

    Eugene M. Izhikevich. Polychronization: Computation with spikes. Neural Comput. , 18(2):245–282, February 2006

    2006

  37. [37]

    H. G. Schuster and P. Wagner. Mutual entrainment of two limit cycle oscillators with time delayed coupling. Progress of Theoretical Physics , 81(5):939--945, 05 1989

    1989

  38. [38]

    Schuster, and Daniel M

    Ernst Niebur, Heinz G. Schuster, and Daniel M. Kammen. Collective frequencies and metastability in networks of limit-cycle oscillators with time delay. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 67:2753--2756, Nov 1991

    1991

  39. [39]

    Collective synchronization of pulse-coupled oscillators and excitable units

    Yoshiki Kuramoto. Collective synchronization of pulse-coupled oscillators and excitable units. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , 50(1):15--30, 1991

    1991

  40. [40]

    M. K. Stephen Yeung and Steven H. Strogatz. Time delay in the K uramoto model of coupled oscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 82:648--651, Jan 1999

    1999

  41. [41]

    M. Y. Choi, H. J. Kim, D. Kim, and H. Hong. Synchronization in a system of globally coupled oscillators with time delay. Phys. Rev. E , 61:371--381, Jan 2000

    2000

  42. [42]

    Earl and Steven H

    Matthew G. Earl and Steven H. Strogatz. Synchronization in oscillator networks with delayed coupling: A stability criterion. Phys. Rev. E , 67:036204, Mar 2003

    2003

  43. [43]

    Acebr\'on, L

    Juan A. Acebr\'on, L. L. Bonilla, Conrad J. P\'erez-Vicente, F\'elix Ritort, and Renato Spigler. The K uramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 77:137--185, Apr 2005

    2005

  44. [44]

    Exact explosive synchronization transitions in kuramoto oscillators with time-delayed coupling

    Hui Wu, Ling Kang, Zonghua Liu, and Mukesh Dhamala. Exact explosive synchronization transitions in kuramoto oscillators with time-delayed coupling. Scientific Reports , 8(1):15521, 2018

    2018

  45. [45]

    Bard Ermentrout

    Kiyoshi Kotani, Ikuhiro Yamaguchi, Yutaro Ogawa, Yasuhiko Jimbo, Hiroya Nakao, and G. Bard Ermentrout. Adjoint method provides phase response functions for delay-induced oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 109:044101, Jul 2012

    2012

  46. [46]

    Nonlinear phase-amplitude reduction of delay-induced oscillations

    Kiyoshi Kotani, Yutaro Ogawa, Sho Shirasaka, Akihiko Akao, Yasuhiko Jimbo, and Hiroya Nakao. Nonlinear phase-amplitude reduction of delay-induced oscillations. Phys. Rev. Res. , 2:033106, Jul 2020

    2020

  47. [47]

    A. Ross, S. N. Kyrychko, K. B. Blyuss, and Y. N. Kyrychko. Dynamics of coupled kuramoto oscillators with distributed delays. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 31(10):103107, 10 2021

    2021

  48. [48]

    Time-delayed kuramoto model in the watts–strogatz small-world networks

    Sara Ameli, Maryam Karimian, and Farhad Shahbazi. Time-delayed kuramoto model in the watts–strogatz small-world networks. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 31(11):113125, 11 2021

    2021

  49. [49]

    A soluble active rotater model showing phase transitions via mutual entertainment

    Hidetsugu Sakaguchi and Yoshiki Kuramoto. A soluble active rotater model showing phase transitions via mutual entertainment. Progress of Theoretical Physics , 76(3):576--581, 09 1986

    1986

  50. [50]

    Laing, and Erik A

    Christian Bick, Marc Goodfellow, Carlo R. Laing, and Erik A. Martens. Understanding the dynamics of biological and neural oscillator networks through exact mean-field reductions: a review. The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience , 10(1):9, 2020

    2020

  51. [51]

    Smirnov and Arkady Pikovsky

    Lev A. Smirnov and Arkady Pikovsky. Dynamics of oscillator populations globally coupled with distributed phase shifts. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 132:107401, Mar 2024

    2024

  52. [52]

    Slow switching in globally coupled oscillators: robustness and occurrence through delayed coupling

    Hiroshi Kori and Yoshiki Kuramoto. Slow switching in globally coupled oscillators: robustness and occurrence through delayed coupling. Phys. Rev. E , 63:046214, Mar 2001

    2001

  53. [53]

    M.A. Lohe. Synchronization control in networks with uniform and distributed phase lag. Automatica , 54:114--123, 2015

    2015

  54. [54]

    Christian Bick, Bob Rink, and Babette A. J. de Wolff. When time delays and phase lags are not the same: higher-order phase reduction unravels delay-induced synchronization in oscillator networks, 2024

    2024

  55. [55]

    Emergence of higher-order interactions in systems of coupled kuramoto oscillators with time delay

    Narumi Fujii, Keisuke Taga, Riccardo Muolo, Bob Rink, and Hiroya Nakao. Emergence of higher-order interactions in systems of coupled kuramoto oscillators with time delay. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16193 , 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    L. A. Smirnov, V. O. Munyayev, M. I. Bolotov, and I. Belykh. From delay to inertia and triadic interactions: A predictive model for time-delayed oscillator networks, 2026

    2026

  57. [57]

    Battiston, G

    F. Battiston, G. Cencetti, I. Iacopini, V. Latora, M. Lucas, A. Patania, J.-G. Young, and G. Petri. Networks beyond pairwise interactions: structure and dynamics. Phys. Rep. , 874:1--92, 2020

    2020

  58. [58]

    Carletti, D

    T. Carletti, D. Fanelli, and S. Nicoletti. Dynamical systems on hypergraphs. J. Phys. Complex. , 1(3):035006, 2020

    2020

  59. [59]

    Bianconi

    G. Bianconi. Higher- O rder N etworks: A n introduction to simplicial complexes . Cambridge U niversity P ress, 2021

    2021

  60. [60]

    Battiston, E

    F. Battiston, E. Amico, A. Barrat, G. Bianconi, G.F. de Arruda, B. Franceschiello, I. Iacopini, S. Kéfi, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M.M. Murray, T.P. Peixoto, F. Vaccarino, and G. Petri. The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems. Nat. Phys. , 17:1093--1098, 2021

    2021

  61. [61]

    Majhi, M

    S. Majhi, M. Perc, and D. Ghosh. Dynamics on higher-order networks: a review. Journal of The Royal Society Interface , 19(188):20220043, 2022

    2022

  62. [62]

    Bick, Elizabeth Gross, Heather A Harrington, and Michael T Schaub

    C. Bick, Elizabeth Gross, Heather A Harrington, and Michael T Schaub. What are higher-order networks? SIAM Rev. , 65(3):686--731, 2023

    2023

  63. [63]

    Boccaletti, P

    S. Boccaletti, P. De Lellis, C.I. Del Genio, K. Alfaro-Bittner, R. Criado, S. Jalan, and M. Romance. The structure and dynamics of networks with higher order interactions. Phys. Rep. , 1018:1--64, 2023

    2023

  64. [64]

    Muolo, L

    R. Muolo, L. Giambagli, H. Nakao, D. Fanelli, and T. Carletti. Turing patterns on discrete topologies: from networks to higher-order structures. Proceedings of the Royal Society A , 480(2302):20240235, 2024

    2024

  65. [65]

    Deeper but smaller: Higher-order interactions increase linear stability but shrink basins

    Yuanzhao Zhang, Per Sebastian Skardal, Federico Battiston, Giovanni Petri, and Maxime Lucas. Deeper but smaller: Higher-order interactions increase linear stability but shrink basins. Science Advances , 10(40):eado8049, 2024

    2024

  66. [66]

    Mill \'a n, H

    A.P. Mill \'a n, H. Sun, L. Giambagli, R. Muolo, T. Carletti, J.J. Torres, F. Radicchi, J. Kurths, and G. Bianconi. Topology shapes dynamics of higher-order networks. Nature Physics , 21:353--361, 2025

    2025

  67. [67]

    Battiston, C

    F. Battiston, C. Bick, M. Lucas, A.P. Mill \'a n, P.S. Skardal, and Y. Zhang. Collective dynamics on higher-order networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.05253 , 2025

    arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Ott and T.M

    E. Ott and T.M. Antonsen. Low dimensional behavior of large systems of globally coupled oscillators. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 18(3), September 2008

    2008

  69. [69]

    Sanders, Ferdinand Verhulst, and James Murdock

    Jan A. Sanders, Ferdinand Verhulst, and James Murdock. Averaging Methods in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems , volume 59 of Applied Mathematical Sciences . Springer, New York, 2 edition, 2007

    2007

  70. [70]

    H. Nakao. Phase reduction approach to synchronisation of nonlinear oscillators. Contemporary Physics , 57(2):188--214, 2016

    2016

  71. [71]

    Antonsen

    Wai Shing Lee, Edward Ott, and Thomas M. Antonsen. Large coupled oscillator systems with heterogeneous interaction delays. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 103:044101, Jul 2009

    2009

  72. [72]

    Existence and robustness of phase-locking in coupled K uramoto oscillators under mean-field feedback

    Alessio Franci, Antoine Chaillet, and William Pasillas-L \'e pine. Existence and robustness of phase-locking in coupled K uramoto oscillators under mean-field feedback. Automatica , 47(6):1193--1202, 2011

    2011