Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 98 references

A dyon QED with two gauge fields produces hybrid vacuum refractive indices that still reduce to ordinary Euler-Heisenberg light when the magnetic charge is switched off.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 08:22 UTC pith:UGO3GZ5L

load-bearing objection Clean, explicit one-loop EH Lagrangian for the two-potential dQED model; hybrid refractive indices and a birefringence hierarchy that reduce correctly to QED are the real additions. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.10906 v1 pith:UGO3GZ5L submitted 2026-07-12 hep-th

The Euler-Heisenberg action for a U(1)times U(1) dyon quantum electrodynamics

D.O.R. Azevedo , T.S. Dias , E.D. Pereira This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords Euler-Heisenbergdyon QEDU(1)×U(1)vacuum birefringenceSchwinger proper timenonlinear electrodynamicsmagnetic monopoleseffective Lagrangian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs the one-loop effective theory for a U(1) imes U(1) electrodynamics of dyons by integrating out the fermion with Schwinger’s proper-time method. The resulting Euler-Heisenberg-type Lagrangian mixes the electric and magnetic gauge sectors, generates an analog of the Schwinger pair-production threshold, and yields nonlinear Maxwell equations. When those equations are linearized about a constant magnetic background, the vacuum acquires anisotropic permittivity and permeability tensors whose plane-wave solutions are hybrid photon-metaphoton modes. The associated refractive indices exhibit vacuum birefringence; every expression collapses exactly to the classic QED result once the magnetic charge vanishes. A sympathetic reader cares because any measured deviation from ordinary QED birefringence could therefore be reinterpreted as a signature of a hidden magnetic charge.

Core claim

The one-loop effective Lagrangian of U(1) imes U(1) dyon QED produces hybrid refractive indices n∥± and n⊥± for parallel and perpendicular polarizations in a magnetic background; these indices display vacuum birefringence and reduce exactly to the standard Euler-Heisenberg prediction of ordinary QED when the magnetic charge is set to zero.

What carries the argument

The renormalized weak-field Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian (Eq. 25) obtained from the proper-time integral; its second derivatives supply the mixed permittivity and permeability tensors that determine the hybrid dispersion relations and refractive indices.

Load-bearing premise

All optical predictions rest on a weak-field truncation of the proper-time integral evaluated on a constant, purely magnetic background; higher-order operators become mandatory once the field approaches the critical scale set by the dyon mass.

What would settle it

A precision measurement of vacuum magnetic birefringence (for example by PVLAS-type laser polarimetry) that either matches the pure-QED formula or shows a statistically significant deviation consistent with a non-zero magnetic charge would settle the claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Vacuum birefringence becomes a possible experimental window on magnetic charge even if free monopoles remain undetected.
  • Photon and metaphoton modes mix through the fermion loop, producing hybrid eigenmodes whose two birefringent responses differ already at leading order in the symmetric-charge case.
  • The same effective Lagrangian supplies concrete amplitudes for photon-metaphoton and metaphoton-metaphoton light-by-light scattering.
  • Pair production can be driven by the magnetic-sector electric field alone, enlarging the set of environments in which dyon-antidyon creation is possible.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If laboratory or magnetar-strength magnetic fields ever approach the critical scale, the hierarchy between the two hybrid modes could become an independent diagnostic of magnetic charge before higher-order operators fully dominate.
  • Coupling the same effective theory to gravity would immediately yield dyonic black-hole solutions whose quasinormal modes and shadows carry the hybrid vacuum birefringence.
  • The parametric suppression of mixing under a large charge hierarchy suggests that millicharged dark-sector scenarios could still leave a detectable residual birefringence signature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives the one-loop Euler–Heisenberg effective Lagrangian for a U(1)×U(1) dyon QED (dQED) via the Schwinger proper-time method, starting from the two-potential classical action of Refs. [22,23]. After renormalizing the proper-time integral, the authors obtain a weak-field Lagrangian (Eq. 25) containing Euler–Heisenberg self-interaction terms for each gauge sector plus photon–metaphoton mixing operators. They extract the analog of the Schwinger pair-production rate (Eq. 29), the nonlinear vacuum Maxwell equations, and—after linearization about a constant purely magnetic background—the permittivity and permeability tensors, dispersion relations, and parallel/perpendicular refractive indices (Eqs. 56–57). The refractive indices describe hybrid eigenmodes of the two gauge sectors; in the symmetric case q_{(1)}=q_{(2)} they exhibit a nontrivial hierarchy of birefringence. All formulae are shown to reduce to standard Euler–Heisenberg QED when the magnetic charge vanishes.

Significance. If correct, the work supplies a controlled, gauge-invariant one-loop effective theory for a local two-potential dyon electrodynamics free of Dirac strings, with explicit hybrid vacuum-optical predictions that are falsifiable in principle against pure QED birefringence. Strengths include: (i) systematic reduction checks to the g→0 (and e→0) limits at every stage (pair production, constitutive tensors, refractive indices); (ii) preservation of the classical P and T symmetries of the underlying model, in contrast to some earlier dyonic effective Lagrangians; (iii) a concrete, parameter-controlled hierarchy between the two hybrid birefringent modes in the symmetric-charge case. The results are of interest for monopole/dyon phenomenology, vacuum-polarization experiments, and as a one-loop realization of sector mixing without a fundamental kinetic-mixing operator. The weak-field and constant-background assumptions are stated explicitly and do not hide the domain of validity.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. V, Eqs. (59)–(60): the claimed hierarchy δn^{+}∼O(B^{2}) versus δn^{-}∼O(B^{4}) is presented as a potential experimental signature of the hybrid modes. The manuscript itself notes (after Eq. 54 and again after Eq. 62) that O(B^{4}) corrections require higher-order operators in the Euler–Heisenberg expansion for a consistent truncation. Because the leading non-vanishing contribution to δn^{-} sits precisely at that order, the hierarchy prediction is incomplete without at least a sketch of the next-order terms (or an explicit statement that δn^{-} is not predictive within the present truncation). This should be clarified or the claim softened.
  2. Sec. III, passage from the proper-time integrand (21) to the closed weak-field form (25): the Laplace-transform evaluation that produces the mixed square-root structures involving N^{(a)} is not written out. While the pure-sector Euler–Heisenberg pieces are standard, the mixed terms are the novel content of the paper; without intermediate steps (or a supplementary derivation), independent verification of the coefficients in (26) is difficult. A short appendix or expanded intermediate expression would make the central result fully reproducible.
minor comments (6)
  1. Sec. III after Eq. (12): the statement that the generalization of Schwinger’s method to two gauge fields is “straightforward” and therefore omitted is understandable, but a one-paragraph sketch of how the operator q^{(a)}F^{(a)} enters the heat kernel (or an explicit pointer to the precise formulae used from Refs. [69,70,73]) would help non-specialist readers.
  2. Eq. (7) and the pair-production discussion after Eq. (29): the physical interpretation that the magnetic-sector electric field E^{(2)} contributes to pair production while also sourcing the total magnetic field B is subtle. A short clarifying sentence relating the sector fields (E^{(a)},B^{(a)}) to the physical (E,B) in the pair-production regime would avoid confusion.
  3. Eq. (49): the general dispersion relation is left in a form that is “quite daunting” to solve. Even a brief remark on whether numerical roots were checked for a sample (B_{0}^{(1)},B_{0}^{(2)},θ) would strengthen confidence that no unexpected complex branches appear inside the weak-field domain.
  4. Notation: the dual index (¯b) is introduced after Eq. (25) but used earlier in spirit; defining it once at first use would improve readability. Likewise, boldface F for the matrix versus F for the invariant is standard but could be flagged in a footnote.
  5. Typos / style: “DISPERSION RELA TIONS” and “V ACUUM BIREFRINGENCE” (section headings) contain stray spaces; “metaphoton” is introduced without a one-sentence definition in the main text (it appears only in the introduction’s “photons and metaphotons”). A few references (e.g. [23]) are theses; if a published version exists it should be preferred.
  6. Appendix A: the lengthy expression (A4) is useful but dense. Highlighting which terms survive for a purely magnetic background (the case used in Secs. IV–V) would make the appendix more usable.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: standard Schwinger proper-time derivation of the one-loop effective Lagrangian and its optical consequences, with only minor non-load-bearing self-citation of the underlying model.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. III, paragraph after Eq. (9); also Sec. I and II]
    "The quantum consistency of the dQED was studied in [23] to all orders in perturbation theory within the framework of algebraic renormalization [24]. It was shown that it is free of gauge anomalies and multiplicatively renormalizable. Since the renormalizability properties of the dQED are well established, we now explore some of the phenomenological consequences... the absence of gauge anomalies allows the fermionic fields to be integrated out without obstructions"

    The justification for integrating out the fermions (and thus for the existence of a local effective Lagrangian) rests on a self-citation to the co-author’s master’s thesis. This is a minor, non-load-bearing step: the subsequent proper-time calculation itself is self-contained and does not inherit any numerical or functional content from [23].

full rationale

The derivation chain begins from the classical U(1)×U(1) dQED action (Eqs. 1–5), applies the textbook Schwinger proper-time evaluation of the fermionic determinant (Eqs. 10–21), subtracts the standard UV divergences, and obtains the weak-field Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian (Eq. 25). All subsequent steps—pair-production poles (Eq. 29), nonlinear Maxwell equations via the displacement tensor (Eqs. 30–32 and Appendix A), linearization about a pure magnetic background (Eqs. 33–37), dispersion relations (Eq. 49), and hybrid refractive indices (Eqs. 56–57)—follow by direct differentiation and plane-wave substitution. The reduction g→0 recovers ordinary QED at every stage by algebraic cancellation of the second-sector coefficients, which is a consistency check rather than a circular input. The sole self-citations ([22,23]) establish the classical model and its all-order renormalizability; they are not used to force any coefficient, dispersion relation, or birefringence formula. No parameters are fitted to data, no uniqueness theorem is imported to exclude alternatives, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. The weak-field truncation and constant-background assumptions are stated explicitly and do not render the reported expressions tautological. Hence the central claims are independent of their inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 2 invented entities

The calculation rests on the classical U(1)×U(1) dQED action of prior work by the same group, the standard Schwinger proper-time representation, the assumption of constant background fields, and the weak-field truncation. No free parameters are fitted; charges and mass remain external inputs. The only invented entities are the metaphoton and the hybrid modes, both direct consequences of the two-potential formulation already postulated in the classical theory.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The classical dQED action (Eq. 1) with two independent U(1) potentials and no Dirac-string singularities is a consistent, renormalizable quantum field theory.
    Taken from Refs. [22,23] (same collaboration); algebraic renormalization is cited but not re-derived.
  • standard math Schwinger’s proper-time representation of the fermion determinant is valid for constant background fields of both gauge sectors.
    Standard textbook technique (Schwinger 1951); generalization to two Abelian fields is linear and unproblematic.
  • domain assumption The weak-field expansion of the proper-time integral may be truncated at O(s^2) (i.e., O(F^4)) for the optical analysis.
    Explicitly stated after Eq. 23; validity limited to B ≪ Bcrit.
  • domain assumption Background electric fields vanish and magnetic backgrounds are constant and homogeneous.
    Imposed in Sec. IV to obtain analytic permittivity/permeability tensors.
invented entities (2)
  • metaphoton (second massless U(1) gauge boson) no independent evidence
    purpose: Carries the magnetic charge and supplies the dual potential that eliminates Dirac strings.
    Already present in the classical model of Refs. [20–23]; not newly postulated here.
  • hybrid photon-metaphoton propagation eigenmodes no independent evidence
    purpose: True eigenvectors of the mixed permittivity/permeability tensors; replace pure photon and metaphoton modes once the fermionic loop is integrated out.
    Direct consequence of the one-loop mixing terms; no independent experimental handle is given.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 27503 in / 2686 out tokens · 26015 ms · 2026-07-14T08:22:47.554229+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The one-loop effective Lagrangian of quantum electrodynamics for dyons (dQED) with a $U(1) \times U(1)$ gauge symmetry is derived using the Schwinger proper-time method. We identify the analog of the Schwinger pair-production limit and compute the corresponding nonlinear equations of motion. The electromagnetic response of the model is analyzed by linearizing the equations of motion around a purely magnetic background. From the resulting plane-wave solutions, we obtain the effective permittivity and permeability tensors, along with the associated dispersion relations and refractive indices for parallel and perpendicular polarization modes. The refractive indices involve hybrid superpositions of both gauge sectors, as illustrated in the symmetric case $q_{(1)} = q_{(2)}$. In this background, the model exhibits vacuum birefringence, indicating that the quantum vacuum behaves as an anisotropic medium. All results consistently reduce to the standard Euler-Heisenberg predictions of QED when the magnetic charge vanishes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    F(c) +ıG (c) F(c) −ıG (c) −1/2 F(¯a)−ıG (¯a) 1/2 +c.c. # F µν (c) − 11 2 N(¯a)

    and Salam [21], and using Schwinger’s proper-time method [69], we derive an effective nonlinear electrodynamics (NLED) described by an Euler-Heisenberg-type Lagrangian (25). This effective theory incorporates nonlinear contri- butions from both gauge sectors and reduces to the standard QED Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian in the limitg→0. Conversely, in the li...

    2025

  2. [2]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field,, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A133, 60 (1931)

    1931

  3. [3]

    P. A. M. Dirac, The Theory of magnetic poles, Phys. Rev.74, 817 (1948)

    1948

  4. [4]

    J. S. Schwinger, Magnetic charge and quantum field theory, Phys. Rev.144, 1087 (1966)

    1966

  5. [5]

    J. S. Schwinger, Sources and electrodynamics, Phys. Rev.158, 1391 (1967)

    1967

  6. [6]

    J. S. Schwinger, Sources and magnetic charge, Phys. Rev.173, 1536 (1968)

    1968

  7. [7]

    J. S. Schwinger, A Magnetic model of matter, Science165, 757 (1969)

    1969

  8. [8]

    ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B79, 276 (1974)

    1974

  9. [9]

    A. M. Polyakov, Particle Spectrum in Quantum Field Theory, JETP Lett.20, 194 (1974)

    1974

  10. [10]

    Julia and A

    B. Julia and A. Zee, Poles with Both Magnetic and Electric Charges in Nonabelian Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D11, 2227 (1975)

    1975

  11. [11]

    E. B. Bogomolny, Stability of Classical Solutions, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.24, 449 (1976)

    1976

  12. [12]

    M. K. Prasad and C. M. Sommerfield, An Exact Classical Solution for the ’t Hooft Monopole and the Julia-Zee Dyon, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 760 (1975)

    1975

  13. [13]

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Concept of Nonintegrable Phase Factors and Global Formulation of Gauge Fields, Phys. Rev. D12, 3845 (1975)

    1975

  14. [14]

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Dirac Monopole Without Strings: Monopole Harmonics, Nucl. Phys. B107, 365 (1976)

    1976

  15. [15]

    Y. M. Cho and D. Maison, Monopoles in Weinberg-Salam model, Phys. Lett. B391, 360 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9601028. 15

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  16. [16]

    Y. M. Cho, K. Kim, and J. H. Yoon, Finite Energy Electroweak Dyon, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 67 (2015), arXiv:1305.1699 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Y. M. Shnir, Magnetic Monopoles, Text and Monographs in Physics (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2005)

    2005

  18. [18]

    N. E. Mavromatos and V. A. Mitsou, Magnetic monopoles revisited: Models and searches at colliders and in the Cosmos, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, 2030012 (2020), arXiv:2005.05100 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Zwanziger, Quantum field theory of particles with both electric and magnetic charges, Phys

    D. Zwanziger, Quantum field theory of particles with both electric and magnetic charges, Phys. Rev.176, 1489 (1968)

    1968

  20. [20]

    Zwanziger, Local Lagrangian quantum field theory of electric and magnetic charges, Phys

    D. Zwanziger, Local Lagrangian quantum field theory of electric and magnetic charges, Phys. Rev. D3, 880 (1971)

    1971

  21. [21]

    Cabibbo and E

    N. Cabibbo and E. Ferrari, Quantum electrodynamics with Dirac monopoles, Nuovo Cim.23, 1147 (1962)

    1962

  22. [22]

    Salam, Magnetic monopole and two photon theories of C violation, Phys

    A. Salam, Magnetic monopole and two photon theories of C violation, Phys. Lett.22, 683 (1966)

    1966

  23. [23]

    Govaerts, Magnetic monopoles with no strings attached: a portal to the dark side of dual electrodynamics, Eur

    J. Govaerts, Magnetic monopoles with no strings attached: a portal to the dark side of dual electrodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 158 (2023), arXiv:2302.03526 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    T. d. S. Dias, A eletrodinˆ amica quˆ antica de Cabibbo-Ferrari-Salam, Master’s thesis, Pro-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pos- Gradua¸ c˜ ao - UFV (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Piguet and S

    O. Piguet and S. P. Sorella, Algebraic renormalization: Perturbative renormalization, symmetries and anomalies, Vol. 28 (Springer-Verlag, 1995)

    1995

  26. [26]

    H. H. Kolm, F. Villa, and A. Odian, Search for Magnetic Monopoles, Phys. Rev. D4, 1285 (1971)

    1971

  27. [27]

    L. W. Alvarez, P. H. Eberhard, R. R. Ross, and R. D. Watt, Search for Magnetic Monopoles in the Lunar Sample, Science 167, 701 (1970)

    1970

  28. [28]

    Bendtz, D

    K. Bendtz, D. Milstead, H. P. H¨ achler, A. M. Hirt, P. Mermod, P. Michael, T. Sloan, C. Tegner, and S. B. Thorarinsson, Search for magnetic monopoles in polar volcanic rocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 121803 (2013), arXiv:1301.6530 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    Jeon and M

    H. Jeon and M. J. Longo, Search for magnetic monopoles trapped in matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1443 (1995), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 76, 159 (1996)], arXiv:hep-ex/9508003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  30. [30]

    P. B. Price and M. H. Salamon, Search for Supermassive Magnetic Monopoles Using Mica Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 1226 (1986)

    1986

  31. [31]

    Burdin, M

    S. Burdin, M. Fairbairn, P. Mermod, D. Milstead, J. Pinfold, T. Sloan, and W. Taylor, Non-collider searches for stable massive particles, Phys. Rept.582, 1 (2015), arXiv:1410.1374 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Ambrosio et al

    M. Ambrosio et al. (MACRO), Final results of magnetic monopole searches with the MACRO experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C25, 511 (2002), arXiv:hep-ex/0207020

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  33. [33]

    Abbasi et al

    R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube), Search for Relativistic Magnetic Monopoles with Eight Years of IceCube Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 051101 (2022), arXiv:2109.13719 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Albert et al

    A. Albert et al. (ANTARES), Search for magnetic monopoles with ten years of the ANTARES neutrino telescope, JHEAp 34, 1 (2022), arXiv:2202.13786 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    F. C. Adams, M. Fatuzzo, K. Freese, G. Tarle, R. Watkins, and M. S. Turner, Extension of the Parker bound on the flux of magnetic monopoles, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2511 (1993)

    1993

  36. [36]

    Kobayashi and D

    T. Kobayashi and D. Perri, Parker bounds on monopoles with arbitrary charge from galactic and primordial magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D108, 083005 (2023), arXiv:2307.07553 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Zhang, S.-H

    C. Zhang, S.-H. Zhang, B. Fu, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, On the cosmological abundance of magnetic monopoles, JHEP 08, 220, arXiv:2404.04926 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Perri, M

    D. Perri, M. Doro, and T. Kobayashi, Recasting experimental constraints on relativistic magnetic monopoles, Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102134 (2025), arXiv:2507.05136 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Perri, Noninflationary solution to the monopole problem, Phys

    D. Perri, Noninflationary solution to the monopole problem, Phys. Rev. D113, 023547 (2026), arXiv:2509.23726 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    G. R. Kalbfleisch, W. Luo, K. A. Milton, E. H. Smith, and M. G. Strauss, Limits on production of magnetic monopoles utilizing samples from the D0 and CDF detectors at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D69, 052002 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0306045

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  41. [41]

    Aktas et al

    A. Aktas et al. (H1), A Direct search for stable magnetic monopoles produced in positron-proton collisions at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C41, 133 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0501039

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  42. [42]

    Fairbairn, A

    M. Fairbairn, A. C. Kraan, D. A. Milstead, T. Sjostrand, P. Z. Skands, and T. Sloan, Stable Massive Particles at Colliders, Phys. Rept.438, 1 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0611040

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  43. [43]

    Abbiendi et al

    G. Abbiendi et al. (OPAL), Search for Dirac magnetic monopoles in e+e- collisions with the OPAL detector at LEP2, Phys. Lett. B663, 37 (2008), arXiv:0707.0404 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  44. [44]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Search for magnetic monopoles and stable particles with high electric charges in √s= 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, JHEP11, 112, arXiv:2308.04835 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Acharya et al

    B. Acharya et al. (MoEDAL), Search for Highly Ionizing Particles in pp Collisions during LHC Run 2 Using the Full MoEDAL Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 071802 (2025), arXiv:2311.06509 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    I. K. Affleck and N. S. Manton, Monopole Pair Production in a Magnetic Field, Nucl. Phys. B194, 38 (1982)

    1982

  47. [47]

    Gould, D

    O. Gould, D. L. J. Ho, and A. Rajantie, Towards Schwinger production of magnetic monopoles in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. D100, 015041 (2019), arXiv:1902.04388 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Gould, I

    O. Gould, I. Ostrovskiy, and A. Upreti, Next frontiers for magnetic monopole searches, Phys. Rev. D111, 102004 (2025), arXiv:2409.04552 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Patrizii and M

    L. Patrizii and M. Spurio, Status of Searches for Magnetic Monopoles, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.65, 279 (2015), arXiv:1510.07125 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  50. [50]

    Rajantie, Magnetic monopoles – theory overview, in 29th International Symposium on Particles, String and Cosmology (2024) arXiv:2411.05753 [hep-ph]

    A. Rajantie, Magnetic monopoles – theory overview, in 29th International Symposium on Particles, String and Cosmology (2024) arXiv:2411.05753 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Heisenberg and H

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons, Z. Phys.98, 714 (1936), arXiv:physics/0605038. 16

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1936

  52. [52]

    G. V. Dunne, The Heisenberg-Euler Effective Action: 75 years on, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A27, 1260004 (2012), arXiv:1202.1557 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  53. [53]

    Born and L

    M. Born and L. Infeld, Foundations of the new field theory, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A144, 425 (1934)

    1934

  54. [54]

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, Nonlinear Electrodynamics from Quantized Strings, Phys. Lett. B163, 123 (1985)

    1985

  55. [55]

    Cederwall, A

    M. Cederwall, A. von Gussich, A. R. Mikovic, B. E. W. Nilsson, and A. Westerberg, On the Dirac-Born-Infeld action for d-branes, Phys. Lett. B390, 148 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9606173

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  56. [56]

    G. W. Gibbons, Born-Infeld particles and Dirichlet p-branes, Nucl. Phys. B514, 603 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9709027

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  57. [57]

    S. I. Kruglov, Magnetized black holes and nonlinear electrodynamics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32, 1750147 (2017), arXiv:1710.09290 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    S. I. Kruglov, Nonlinear Electrodynamics and Magnetic Black Holes, Annalen Phys.529, 1700073 (2017), arXiv:1708.07006 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    S. I. Kruglov, The heat engine of magnetic black holes in AdS space with rational nonlinear electrodynamics, Can. Jour. Phys.103, 448 (2024)

    2024

  60. [60]

    Nozari, S

    K. Nozari, S. Saghafi, and F. Aliyan, Investigating QED effects on the thin accretion disk properties around rotating Euler–Heisenberg black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 735 (2025), arXiv:2506.17986 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Channuie, A

    P. Channuie, A. Ditta, N. Kaewkhao, and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Traversable wormholes in Einstein-Euler–Heisenberg gravity: Geom- etry, energy conditions, and gravitational lensing, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101963 (2025), arXiv:2503.23065 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Lambiase, D

    G. Lambiase, D. J. Gogoi, R. C. Pantig, and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Shadow and quasinormal modes of the rotating Ein- stein–Euler–Heisenberg black holes, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101886 (2025), arXiv:2406.18300 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    S. I. Kruglov, Inflation of Universe by Nonlinear Electrodynamics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D29, 2050102 (2020), arXiv:2010.03632 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    H. B. Benaoum, G. Leon, A. Ovgun, and H. Quevedo, Inflation driven by non-linear electrodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 367 (2023), arXiv:2206.13157 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    I. H. Brevik, M. M. Chaichian, and A. Tureanu, Below the Schwinger critical magnetic field value, quantum vacuum and gamma-ray bursts delay, Phys. Lett. B861, 139272 (2025), arXiv:2501.11080 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    S. A. Bruce, Nonlinear electrodynamics and its possible connection to relativistic superconductivity: an example, Z. Naturforsch. A79, 1041 (2024)

    2024

  67. [67]

    S. A. Bruce, Nonlinear electrodynamics and its possible connection to relativistic superconductivity: instance of a time- dependent system, Z. Naturforsch. A80, 519 (2025)

    2025

  68. [68]

    Marmier, N

    C. Marmier, N. Seegert, and F. Karbstein, Impact of background field localization on vacuum polarization effects, Phys. Rev. D111, 016005 (2025), arXiv:2411.08162 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    S. G. Kovalevich, P. Osland, Y. M. Shnir, and E. A. Tolkachev, The Effective Lagrangian of QED with a magnetic charge and dyon mass bounds, Phys. Rev. D55, 5807 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9702402

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  70. [70]

    J. S. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev.82, 664 (1951)

    1951

  71. [71]

    Dittrich and H

    W. Dittrich and H. Gies, Probing the quantum vacuum. Perturbative effective action approach in quantum electrodynamics and its application, Walter Dittrich, Gies H. Berlin: Springer166, 10.1007/3-540-45585-X (2000)

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-45585-x 2000

  72. [72]

    N. F. Ramsey, Time Reversal, Charge Conjugation, Magnetic Pole Conjugation, and Parity, Phys. Rev.109, 225 (1958)

    1958

  73. [73]

    Singleton, Electromagnetism with Magnetic Charge and Two Photons, Am

    D. Singleton, Electromagnetism with Magnetic Charge and Two Photons, Am. J. Phys.64, 452 (1996), arXiv:1106.1505 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  74. [74]

    M. D. Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    2014

  75. [75]

    A. A. Petrov and A. E. Blechman, Effective Field Theories (WSP, 2016)

    2016

  76. [76]

    Deser, L

    S. Deser, L. Griguolo, and D. Seminara, Effective QED actions: Representations, gauge invariance, anomalies and mass expansions, Phys. Rev. D57, 7444 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9712066

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  77. [77]

    T. N. Jacobson and T. Ter Veldhuis, Nonperturbative one-loop effective action for QED with Yukawa couplings, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33, 1850157 (2018), arXiv:1806.04040 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  78. [78]

    Bilal, Lectures on Anomalies, (2008), arXiv:0802.0634 [hep-th]

    A. Bilal, Lectures on Anomalies, (2008), arXiv:0802.0634 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  79. [79]

    Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields. Vol. 2: Modern applications (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  80. [80]

    G. V. Dunne, Heisenberg-Euler and the quantum dilogarithm, Phys. Rev. D113, 085018 (2026), arXiv:2512.14915 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

Showing first 80 references.