Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 64 references

A global adiabatic rule halves the length needed for acoustic non-Abelian holonomic gates, and the same layout yields one-way mode conversion.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 07:44 UTC pith:2YWLSKOO

load-bearing objection Solid numerical design paper: GAC power-law envelopes give Pauli-X/Hadamard acoustic NHTs at half the Gaussian length, with clean CMT–FEM agreement; simulation-only and self-cited GAC are the real limits. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.11000 v1 pith:2YWLSKOO submitted 2026-07-13 physics.optics quant-ph

Non-Abelian holonomic transformations in digitally coupled acoustic waveguides guided by the global adiabatic criterion

Jin-Kang Guo , Jia Li , Jin-Lei Wu , Chuan-Cun Shu This is my paper
classification physics.optics quant-ph
keywords non-Abelian holonomic transformationsglobal adiabatic criterionacoustic waveguidescoupled-mode theoryphase stitchingexceptional pointunidirectional mode conversionadiabatic passage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that non-Abelian holonomic transformations—geometric operations set by a path in a degenerate dark subspace—can be built compactly in sound. A four-level tripod model is mapped onto four slit-coupled acoustic waveguides; coupling envelopes plus a resonant phase module stitch two stages of evolution so that Pauli-X and Hadamard-type maps appear in the waveguide intensities. The design uses a global adiabatic criterion that measures the total nonadiabatic burden and its spatial unevenness, rather than only a local slow-change rule. A power-law envelope chosen by that criterion flattens the burden and reaches the target outputs at half the active coupling length of a reference Gaussian envelope used in prior acoustic adiabatic-passage work. Full-wave simulations match analytical coupled-mode predictions. The same phase-stitched layout, with an added loss contrast, also produces unidirectional mode conversion that the authors link to branch selection around an exceptional point. A sympathetic reader cares because the work offers a quantitative, length-saving design rule for geometric wave control and shows that one acoustic architecture can serve both holonomic logic and one-way routing.

Core claim

Guided by the global adiabatic criterion, a power-law coupling envelope in a digitally slit-coupled four-waveguide device implements Pauli-X and Hadamard-type non-Abelian holonomic transformations with excellent agreement between full-wave normalized intensities and coupled-mode theory, using half the active coupling length required by a reference Gaussian envelope; the same phase-stitched structure also supports unidirectional mode conversion linked to exceptional-point branch selection.

What carries the argument

The global adiabatic criterion (GAC): integrated metrics of the nonadiabaticity factor Q(z) = |∂_z θ(z)| / √2 C(z)—specifically its root-mean-square Q_rms and spatial variance σ²_Q—used to select a power-law envelope that lowers and flattens the global nonadiabatic burden relative to a Gaussian reference, thereby enabling compact two-stage phase-stitched holonomic evolution.

Load-bearing premise

That the continuous-envelope global nonadiabatic scores still predict dark-state following after the couplings are sampled into discrete slits, a resonant phase module is inserted, and the device is discretized in a full-wave hard-wall simulation.

What would settle it

Build or re-simulate the four-waveguide device at the chosen GAC working point (α = 1.10, L = 65 cm active coupling) and at the matched-length Gaussian; if the extracted target-waveguide intensities fail to match the coupled-mode Pauli-X or Hadamard predictions, or if the Gaussian at 130 cm is not required to recover comparable fidelity, the claimed factor-of-two length reduction fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript maps a four-level tripod holonomic protocol onto a slit-coupled four-waveguide acoustic device and designs two-stage, phase-stitched coupling envelopes using a global adiabatic criterion (GAC). A power-law envelope selected via GAC metrics is compared with a reference Gaussian profile; full-wave FEM simulations at 8800 Hz show Pauli-X (φ=π/4) and Hadamard-type (φ=π/8) intensity transformations at L=65 cm active coupling length—half the length needed for the Gaussian reference—with extracted waveguide intensities in close agreement with coupled-mode theory. An acoustically induced transparency phase module supplies the required π stitching. The same phase-stitched architecture, with an added loss contrast, is further shown to support unidirectional zero-to-first-order mode conversion, interpreted via a reduced two-mode non-Hermitian exceptional-point (EP) branch-selection picture.

Significance. If the numerical evidence holds, the work provides a concrete, compact classical-wave platform for non-Abelian holonomic gates and a practical demonstration that GAC-based envelope design can cut active device length by about a factor of two relative to a standard Gaussian adiabatic-passage profile. Strengths include a calibrated slit-width-to-coupling map, an explicit two-stage protocol with a high-transmission phase module, systematic (α,L) and Q_rms/σ²_Q comparisons (Fig. 2), and six-case FEM–CMT intensity agreement (Fig. 4). The dual use of the same architecture for unidirectional conversion is a useful functional extension. The contribution is primarily numerical validation and design methodology rather than a new geometric theorem; within acoustic metamaterials and classical geometric control it is a solid, publishable advance.

major comments (2)
  1. [§II.C–§III.A, Eqs. (5)–(7), Fig. 2] §II.C–§III.A, Eqs. (5)–(7) and Fig. 2: The GAC metrics Q_rms and σ²_Q that select α=1.10 and underwrite the compactness claim are evaluated on continuous envelopes over a single stage. The fabricated-style device instead uses period-p discrete slit sampling and inserts a resonant AIT phase module between stages (§II.B, §III.B). The manuscript should either recompute Q_rms/σ²_Q (or an equivalent discrete nonadiabatic measure) on the sampled, phase-stitched profiles, or show explicitly that the continuous ranking of envelopes remains predictive after these non-idealities. Fig. 4 already supplies post-hoc FEM validation of the working point, but without a discrete-aware metric the claim that GAC “provides a quantitative basis for compact acoustic implementation” rests on an unquantified transfer of continuous design criteria to the digital device.
  2. [§IV.B, Fig. 5] §IV.B and Fig. 5: The unidirectional mode-conversion claim is less tightly quantified than the holonomic results. The reduced EP Riemann-surface picture is schematic; the text does not report conversion efficiency, reverse isolation, or residual intensity in non-target channels, nor does it specify how the loss contrast Γ is implemented in the full-wave model (e.g., imaginary part of density/modulus, resistive walls, or PML). Without those numbers and implementation details, the link between the observed directionality and “EP-assisted branch selection” remains qualitative and weaker than the carefully documented Pauli-X/Hadamard intensity maps in §IV.A.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§IV.A / Fig. 4] Fig. 4 captions and body: “wavegudie 1” is misspelled; correct to “waveguide 1”.
  2. [§II.A, Eq. (2)] Eq. (2) and surrounding text: the holonomic propagator is written in the {|b⟩,|d⟩} basis; a short explicit map to the logical {|1⟩,|2⟩} matrices for φ=π/4 and φ=π/8 would help readers verify the Pauli-X and Hadamard claims without reconstructing the basis change.
  3. [Fig. 2(a)] Fig. 2(a): the digital (slit-period-sampled) envelopes are hard to distinguish from the continuous curves at the printed scale; a small inset or offset plot would clarify the sampling step used in the device.
  4. [§III.A] §III.A: the reference Gaussian parameters are taken from Ref. [25] (z0, s, σ). A one-sentence statement that C0 = C_max is held fixed for both envelopes (already implied) and that no re-optimization of the Gaussian widths was performed would make the length comparison fully transparent.
  5. [§IV heading] Throughout: “FULL-W A VE” / “DEMONSTRA TION” style spacing artifacts appear in headings; clean for production.
  6. [Introduction / Conclusion] References [42–44] are the authors’ own recent GAC preprints; a brief sentence distinguishing what is new here (acoustic digital coupling + phase stitch + dual EP functionality) from those works would help readers place the novelty.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

GAC and power-law selection strategy imported from authors' concurrent arXiv preprints; α chosen by scanning the same target-intensity metric later declared as success, but FEM/CMT validation remains independent of that loop.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Introduction; §III.A (GAC-guided protocol design)]
    "Recent work has proposed the global adiabatic criterion (GAC) for guiding accelerated adiabatic evolution [42–44] … Following the GAC-based selection strategy of Ref. [42], a scan of the power-law family identifies α=1.10 as the working exponent for the present acoustic parameters."

    The design principle that is claimed to enable the compact NHTs (GAC and its power-law selection strategy) is justified solely by three concurrent arXiv preprints whose author lists overlap with the present paper. No external derivation or independent verification of GAC is supplied; the 'guideline' is therefore imported from the authors' own unverified prior claims.

  2. fitted input called prediction [§III.A; Fig. 2(b)]
    "Figure 2(b) maps the normalized target-output intensity of the GAC-guided power-law profiles in the (α, L) parameter space. The color scale denotes the normalized intensity, the black contour marks 0.99, and the marker denotes the selected working point (α, L)=(1.10,65 cm)."

    The free parameter α of the envelope family is chosen by scanning the continuous-model target intensity itself and retaining the point that already exceeds 0.99. The subsequent claim that the GAC-guided profile 'reaches the target-output level at a substantially shorter au' is therefore partly the result of having optimized against that same intensity metric, not an independent prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation of the holonomic maps (tripod o bright-dark reduction o phase-stitched U with γ=π, φ=π/4 or π/8) is standard and self-contained. The length-reduction claim rests on comparing a power-law envelope against a published Gaussian baseline under identical slit calibration and full-wave FEM. Mild circularity arises only in the design step: GAC itself and the 'GAC-based selection strategy' are taken from the authors' own recent preprints [42–44], and α=1.10 is identified by scanning the continuous-model target intensity (the very quantity later reported as success) rather than by an independent minimization of Q_rms alone. Once the envelope is fixed, however, the load-bearing evidence is the independent CMT–FEM agreement at L=65 cm versus the longer Gaussian, which does not reduce by construction to the self-cited GAC definition. No self-definitional identity, no uniqueness theorem imported as external fact, and no renaming of a known empirical pattern. Score 3 reflects one non-load-bearing self-citation chain plus a parameter scan against the success metric, without collapsing the central experimental claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central length-reduction claim rests on standard coupled-mode/holonomy theory, the authors’ prior GAC definition, a linear slit-to-coupling calibration fitted from auxiliary simulations, a hand-selected power-law exponent α, and the modeling assumption that discrete-slit FEM with a resonant phase module still tracks the continuous dark-state protocol. No new physical entities are postulated; free parameters are design/fit choices that set the working point.

free parameters (6)
  • power-law exponent α = 1.10
    Selected by scanning the power-law family for high target-output intensity under GAC metrics; working value α=1.10 at L=65 cm (Fig. 2b, §III.A).
  • slit-width to coupling linear fit d(C)=aC+b = a=1.5847e-4 m², b=-9.6245e-5 m
    Fitted from auxiliary two-waveguide simulations over the working range; used to map all designed envelopes to geometry (Fig. 1d, §II.B).
  • total active coupling length L (working point) = 65 cm
    Chosen as the short length where GAC profile reaches ~0.99 target intensity while Gaussian does not (Fig. 2).
  • phase-module geometry L_s, D_s = L_s=6.67 mm, D_s=24.4 mm
    Selected from (D_s, L_s) transmission/phase map to give total π shift at T≈0.99 at 8800 Hz (Fig. 3).
  • operating frequency f = 8800 Hz
    Fixed design frequency for all full-wave runs and phase-module tuning.
  • loss contrast Γ (unidirectional section)
    Imposed on WG1 and WGe at the junction to enable EP-related branch selection; value not independently measured.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Schrödinger-type evolution is formally equivalent to coupled-mode transport of acoustic pressure amplitudes along z.
    Stated in §I and used to map the tripod Hamiltonian onto the four-waveguide CMT model (§II.B).
  • domain assumption Under the two-stage cyclic protocol with phase stitching γ=π, evolution in the dark manifold {|d⟩,|ψ0⟩} is purely geometric and yields U=diag(e^{iγ},1) in the {|b⟩,|d⟩} basis.
    Standard non-Abelian holonomy result invoked in §II.A (Eq. 2) following [14,38].
  • ad hoc to paper The global adiabatic metrics Q_rms and σ²_Q (integrals of the local nonadiabaticity factor Q(z)=|∂zθ|/√2C) are valid design criteria for compact high-fidelity dark-state following.
    Taken from the authors’ GAC framework [42–44] and used as the envelope-selection principle in §II.C–III.A.
  • domain assumption Waveguide walls and slits may be modeled as acoustically rigid hard-wall boundaries in FEM.
    Stated in §II.B for all full-wave simulations.
  • domain assumption Period-p sampling of continuous coupling envelopes into discrete slit widths preserves the ordering and adiabatic quality of the design.
    Assumed when mapping envelopes to the digital profiles in Fig. 2a and the full device (§III.A).

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 17751 in / 3763 out tokens · 36674 ms · 2026-07-14T07:44:48.838237+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

An acoustic platform is validated for implementing compact non-Abelian holonomic transformations (NHTs) guided by a global adiabatic criterion (GAC). A tripod model is mapped onto a digitally coupled four-waveguide structure, where designed coupling envelopes and an acoustically-induced-transparency phase-control module implement a two-stage phase-stitched holonomic evolution. Compared with a reference Gaussian envelope, the GAC-guided power-law profile flattens the spatial distribution of the global nonadiabatic burden, thereby providing a quantitative basis for compact acoustic implementation. Full-wave simulations show Pauli-$X$ and Hadamard-type target transformations, with excellent agreement between the extracted normalized intensities and analytical coupled-mode predictions. These target responses are obtained with half the coupling length required by the reference Gaussian implementations. More uniquely, the same phase-stitched structure also supports unidirectional acoustic mode conversion, which is closely related to a reduced two-mode non-Hermitian picture associated with an encircled exceptional point (EP). These results validate acoustic NHTs as a robust geometric route for compact wave control, establish the GAC as a powerful guideline for fast adiabatic transport in digitally coupled systems, and further demonstrate that the same phase-stitched architecture supports unidirectional mode conversion through EP-assisted branch selection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11000 by Chuan-Cun Shu, Jia Li, Jin-Kang Guo, Jin-Lei Wu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of the four-level system and its bright–dark reduction, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. GAC-guided envelope design and normalized target [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Schematic of the phase-shifting unit formed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Full-wave validation of the acoustic Pauli- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Unidirectional acoustic mode conversion enabled by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  2. [2]

    Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and Berry’s phase, Phys

    B. Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and Berry’s phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 2167 (1983)

    1983

  3. [3]

    Zhang, T

    J. Zhang, T. H. Kyaw, S. Filipp, L.-C. Kwek, E. Sj¨ oqvist, and D. Tong, Geometric and holonomic quantum com- putation, Physics Reports1027, 1 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    Liang, P

    Y. Liang, P. Shen, T. Chen, and Z.-Y. Xue, Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation and its optimal control, Science China Information Sciences66, 180502 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Shan and X.-L

    Z.-L. Shan and X.-L. Zhang, Integrated photonics based on non-Abelian holonomy, Sci. Bull.70, 3927 (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    Bergmann, H

    K. Bergmann, H. Theuer, and B. W. Shore, Coherent population transfer among quantum states of atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 1003 (1998)

    1998

  7. [7]

    N. V. Vitanov, A. A. Rangelov, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage in physics, chemistry, and beyond, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015006 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    C.-C. Shu, J. Yu, K.-J. Yuan, W.-H. Hu, J. Yang, and S.- L. Cong, Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage in molec- ular electronic states, Phys. Rev. A79, 023418 (2009)

    2009

  9. [9]

    Q.-Q. Hong, D. Dong, N. E. Henriksen, F. Nori, J. He, and C.-C. Shu, Precise quantum control of molecular ro- tation toward a desired orientation, Phys. Rev. Research 7, L012049 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    Jian, Z.-J

    X.-X. Jian, Z.-J. Zheng, J.-J. Jiang, L. Zhou, C.-C. Shu, and J. He, All-optical Raman control of ultracold atomic hyperfine states using the pulsed jump protocol, Phys. Rev. A112, 013108 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Fan, C.-C

    L.-B. Fan, C.-C. Shu, D. Dong, J. He, N. E. Henrik- sen, and F. Nori, Quantum coherent control of a sin- gle molecular-polariton rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 043604 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    Wilczek and A

    F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Appearance of gauge structure in simple dynamical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 2111 (1984)

    1984

  13. [13]

    Zanardi and M

    P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, Holonomic quantum compu- tation, Phys. Lett. A264, 94 (1999)

    1999

  14. [14]

    L.-M. Duan, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Geometric manipu- lation of trapped ions for quantum computation, Science 292, 1695 (2001)

    2001

  15. [15]

    Leibfried, B

    D. Leibfried, B. DeMarco, V. Meyer, D. Lucas, M. Bar- rett, J. Britton, W. M. Itano, B. Jelenkovi´ c, C. Langer, T. Rosenband, and D. J. Wineland, Experimental demonstration of a robust, high-fidelity geometric two ion-qubit phase gate, Nature422, 412 (2003)

    2003

  16. [16]

    Sj¨ oqvist, D

    E. Sj¨ oqvist, D. M. Tong, L. M. Andersson, B. Hessmo, M. Johansson, and K. Singh, Non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computation, New J. Phys.14, 103035 (2012)

    2012

  17. [17]

    Y. Xu, W. Cai, Y. Ma, X. Mu, L. Hu, T. Chen, H. Wang, Y. P. Song, Z.-Y. Xue, Z.-q. Yin, and L. Sun, Single-loop realization of arbitrary nonadiabatic holonomic single- qubit quantum gates in a superconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 110501 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    Sun, X.-L

    Y.-K. Sun, X.-L. Zhang, F. Yu, Z.-N. Tian, Q.-D. Chen, and H.-B. Sun, Non-Abelian Thouless pumping in pho- tonic waveguides, Nat. Phys.18, 1080 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Zhang, F

    X.-L. Zhang, F. Yu, Z.-G. Chen, Z.-N. Tian, Q.-D. Chen, H.-B. Sun, and G. Ma, Non-Abelian braiding on photonic 8 chips, Nat. Photon.16, 390 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    Xie, B.-W

    J. Xie, B.-W. Guan, J. Zhang, C. Wang, L. Xiao, S. Jia, Y. Zhao, and F. Mei, Observation of non-adiabatic non- Abelian braiding of matter waves, Nature Communica- tions (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    Menchon-Enrich, A

    R. Menchon-Enrich, A. Benseny, V. Ahufinger, A. D. Greentree, T. Busch, and J. Mompart, Spatial adiabatic passage: a review of recent progress, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 074401 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    Chen, W.-G

    Z.-X. Chen, W.-G. Song, G.-C. He, X.-M. Zhang, Z.-G. Chen, H. Xu, and E. Prodan, Emulation of Schr¨ odinger dynamics with metamaterials, Sci. Bull.70, 1347 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Chen, R.-Y

    Z.-G. Chen, R.-Y. Zhang, C. T. Chan, and G. Ma, Clas- sical non-Abelian braiding of acoustic modes, Nat. Phys. 18, 179 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Barlas and E

    Y. Barlas and E. Prodan, Topological braiding of non- Abelian midgap defects in classical metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 146801 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    Shen, Y.-G

    Y.-X. Shen, Y.-G. Peng, D.-G. Zhao, X.-C. Chen, J. Zhu, and X.-F. Zhu, One-way localized adiabatic passage in an acoustic system, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 094501 (2019)

    2019

  26. [26]

    Tang, J.-L

    S. Tang, J.-L. Wu, C. L¨ u, J. Song, and Y. Jiang, Func- tional acoustic metamaterial using shortcut to adiabatic passage in acoustic waveguide couplers, Phys. Rev. Ap- plied18, 014038 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Tang, J.-L

    S. Tang, J.-L. Wu, C. L¨ u, J. Yao, X. Wang, J. Song, and Y. Jiang, One-way acoustic beam splitting in spatial four-waveguide couplers designed by adiabatic passage, New J. Phys.25, 033032 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    J. Wu, S. Tang, Y. Wang, X. Wang, J. Han, C. L¨ u, J. Song, S. Su, Y. Xia, and Y. Jiang, Unidirectional acoustic metamaterials based on nonadiabatic holonomic quantum transformations, Sci. China Phys. Mech. As- tron.65, 220311 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    B. Liu, Z. Zhou, Y. Wang, T. Zentgraf, Y. Li, and L. Huang, Experimental verification of the acoustic geo- metric phase, Appl. Phys. Lett.120, 211702 (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    Long and J

    Y. Long and J. Ren, Floquet topological acoustic res- onators and acoustic Thouless pumping, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America146, 742 (2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    Z.-G. Chen, W. Tang, R.-Y. Zhang, Z. Chen, and G. Ma, Landau-Zener transition in the dynamic trans- fer of acoustic topological states, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 054301 (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    Z. Chen, Z. Chen, Z. Li, B. Liang, G. Ma, Y. Lu, and J. Cheng, Topological pumping in acoustic waveguide ar- rays with hopping modulation, New J. Phys.24, 013004 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Z. Guan, H. Liu, R. Zheng, J. Liang, M. Ke, J. Lu, W. Deng, X. Huang, and Z. Liu, Topological pumping in acoustic Fock lattices, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 064068 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Cheng, S

    Z. Cheng, S. Yue, Y. Long, W. Xie, Z. Yu, H. T. Teo, Y. X. Zhao, H. Xue, and B. Zhang, Observation of re- turning Thouless pumping, Nature Communications16, 9669 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Q. Mo, S. Liang, X. Lan, J. Zhu, and S. Zhang, Demon- stration of returning Thouless pump in a Berry dipole system, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 206603 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    Z. Chen, T. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Li, Z.-K. Lin, F. Gao, L.- W. Wang, Y. Liu, Q. Wang, X. Zhang, G. Ma, X. Chen, M. Lu, Y. Chen, and J.-H. Jiang, Topological phononics (2026), arXiv:2605.20900 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    J.-L. Wu, X. Ji, and S. Zhang, Shortcut to adiabatic pas- sage in a three-level system via a chosen path and its application in a complicated system, Opt. Express25, 21084 (2017)

    2017

  38. [38]

    Liu, Z.-H

    B.-J. Liu, Z.-H. Huang, Z.-Y. Xue, and X.-D. Zhang, Su- peradiabatic holonomic quantum computation in cavity QED, Phys. Rev. A95, 062308 (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    G. S. Vasilev, A. Kuhn, and N. V. Vitanov, Optimum pulse shapes for stimulated Raman adiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. A80, 013417 (2009)

    2009

  40. [40]

    Tang, J.-L

    S. Tang, J.-L. Wu, C. L¨ u, X. Wang, J. Song, and Y. Jiang, Acoustic wavelength-selected metamaterials designed by reversed fractional stimulated Raman adiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. B105, 104107 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    J. Yao, S. Tang, C. L¨ u, J. Zhang, J. Song, and Y. Jiang, Fast energy transfer in an acoustic multicavity cou- pler based on the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger topological model, Phys. Rev. Applied22, 044009 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Xiao, S.-L

    K.-H. Xiao, S.-L. Su, X. Ni, Y.-K. Sun, J.-K. Guo, Z.- Y. Hu, X.-L. Zhang, J. Li, J.-L. Wu, Z.-N. Tian, and Q.-D. Chen, Accelerated topological pumping in pho- tonic waveguides based on global adiabatic criteria, arXiv (2025), arXiv:2512.23466 [physics.optics]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Wu, P.-Y

    J.-L. Wu, P.-Y. Song, J. Li, Y. Gao, Y. Wang, and S.-L. Su, Global adiabatic criterion for fast topological photon transfer in Fock-state lattices (2026), arXiv:2606.03409 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    Guo, J.-L

    J.-K. Guo, J.-L. Wu, and C.-C. Shu, Non-Abelian Thou- less pumping based on the global adiabatic criterion in Rydberg synthetic lattices (2026), arXiv:2607.07223 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Cheng, Y

    Y. Cheng, Y. Jin, Y. Zhou, T. Hao, and Y. Li, Distinction of acoustically induced transparency and Autler-Townes splitting by Helmholtz resonators, Phys. Rev. Applied 12, 044025 (2019)

    2019

  46. [46]

    Porter, K

    R. Porter, K. Pham, and A. Maurel, Modeling Autler- Townes splitting and acoustically induced transparency in a waveguide loaded with resonant channels, Phys. Rev. B105, 134301 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    Liang, B

    B. Liang, B. Yuan, and J.-C. Cheng, Acoustic diode: Rec- tification of acoustic energy flux in one-dimensional sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 104301 (2009)

    2009

  48. [48]

    Liang, X.-S

    B. Liang, X.-S. Guo, J. Tu, D. Zhang, and J.-C. Cheng, An acoustic rectifier, Nat. Mater.9, 989 (2010)

    2010

  49. [49]

    C. Shen, Y. Xie, J. Li, S. A. Cummer, and Y. Jing, Asymmetric acoustic transmission through near-zero- index and gradient-index metasurfaces, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 223502 (2016)

    2016

  50. [50]

    Liu, X.-F

    T. Liu, X.-F. Zhu, F. Chen, S. Liang, and J. Zhu, Uni- directional wave vector manipulation in two-dimensional space with an all-passive acoustic parity-time-symmetric metamaterials crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 124502 (2018)

    2018

  51. [51]

    T. Liu, G. Ma, S. Liang, X.-F. Zhu, and J. Zhu, Single- sided acoustic beam splitting based on parity-time sym- metry, Phys. Rev. B102, 014306 (2020)

    2020

  52. [52]

    A. Song, J. Li, C. Shen, X. Peng, X. Zhu, T. Chen, and S. A. Cummer, Broadband high-index prism for asymmetric acoustic transmission, Appl. Phys. Lett.114, 121902 (2019)

    2019

  53. [53]

    Tang, J.-L

    S. Tang, J.-L. Wu, C. L¨ u, J. Yao, Y. Pei, and Y. Jiang, Unidirectional beam splitting in acoustic metamaterial governed by double fractional stimulated Raman adia- batic passage, Appl. Phys. Lett.122, 212201 (2023). 9

    2023

  54. [54]

    Doppler, A

    J. Doppler, A. A. Mailybaev, J. B¨ ohm, U. Kuhl, A. Girschik, F. Libisch, T. J. Milburn, P. Rabl, N. Moi- seyev, and S. Rotter, Dynamically encircling an excep- tional point for asymmetric mode switching, Nature537, 76 (2016)

    2016

  55. [55]

    Zhang, S

    X.-L. Zhang, S. Wang, B. Hou, and C. T. Chan, Dynam- ically encircling exceptional points: In situ control of en- circling loops and the role of the starting point, Phys. Rev. X8, 021066 (2018)

    2018

  56. [56]

    A. Li, J. Dong, J. Wang, Z. Cheng, J. S. Ho, D. Zhang, J. Wen, X.-L. Zhang, C. T. Chan, A. Al` u, C.-W. Qiu, and L. Chen, Hamiltonian hopping for efficient chiral mode switching in encircling exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 187403 (2020)

    2020

  57. [57]

    X. Shu, A. Li, G. Hu, J. Wang, A. Al` u, and L. Chen, Fast encirclement of an exceptional point for highly efficient and compact chiral mode converters, Nat. Commun.13, 2123 (2022)

    2022

  58. [58]

    C.-X. Guo, S. Chen, K. Ding, and H. Hu, Exceptional non-Abelian topology in multiband non-hermitian sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 157201 (2023)

    2023

  59. [59]

    A. Li, H. Wei, M. Cotrufo, W. Chen, S. Mann, X. Ni, B. Xu, J. Chen, J. Wang, S. Fan, C.-W. Qiu, A. Al` u, and L. Chen, Exceptional points and non-Hermitian pho- tonics at the nanoscale, Nature Nanotechnology18, 706 (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    I. I. Arkhipov, F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, and F. Nori, Restoring adiabatic state transfer in time-modulated non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 113802 (2024)

    2024

  61. [61]

    Shan, Y.-K

    Z.-L. Shan, Y.-K. Sun, R. Tao, Q.-D. Chen, Z.-N. Tian, and X.-L. Zhang, Non-Abelian holonomy in degenerate non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 053802 (2024)

    2024

  62. [62]

    Z. Li, R. Cai, X. Wang, K. Shimomura, C. Lu, Z. Yang, M. Sato, and G. Ma, Exceptional deficiency of non- Hermitian systems, Nature Physics22, 962 (2026)

    2026

  63. [63]

    Xue, Essay: Topological phases and exceptional points in non-Hermitian systems, Phys

    P. Xue, Essay: Topological phases and exceptional points in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 170001 (2026)

    2026

  64. [64]

    M.-R. Yun, Z. Shan, L.-L. Yan, Y. Jia, and S.-L. Su, Entanglement characteristics of encircling an exceptional point in superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. A114, 012430 (2026)

    2026