Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Rydberg atoms unify programmable many-body quantum simulation with driven-dissipative collective phases for quantum technologies.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 07:28 UTC pith:PKOBK65O

load-bearing objection Solid, citation-rich review that cleanly unifies array quantum simulation with ensemble nonequilibrium dynamics; no new results, but useful and referee-worthy as synthesis. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.11038 v1 pith:PKOBK65O submitted 2026-07-13 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Many-Body Physics with Rydberg Atoms: Quantum Simulation and Non-equilibrium Dynamics

Zhengyang Bai , Cheng Chen , Fan Yang , Weibin Li This is my paper
classification quant-ph physics.atom-ph PACS 32.80.Ee03.67.Ac05.30.Rt42.50.Nn
keywords Rydberg atomsquantum simulationatom arraysnonequilibrium dynamicstime crystalsself-organized criticalityoptical bistabilityquantum sensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review argues that Rydberg atoms, with their strong tunable long-range interactions, form a single experimental platform that can both implement programmable spin models (Ising, XY, constrained and topological) in reconfigurable atom arrays and host interaction-driven nonequilibrium phases (optical bistability, continuous and discrete time crystals, self-organized criticality) in thermal ensembles. The authors synthesize the microscopic interaction Hamiltonians, mean-field and kinetic-constraint analyses, and a survey of recent array and vapor-cell experiments that have realized ordered phases, scars, lattice-gauge dynamics, spin liquids, limit cycles and avalanche statistics. A sympathetic reader cares because the same dipole physics that engineers constrained Hilbert spaces for quantum simulation also produces the nonlinearities that drive synchronization and critical sensing, so progress on one side directly informs the other. The paper claims this duality is already yielding concrete technological routes: larger arrays for fault-tolerant simulation, hybrid digital-analog processors, and critical-point metrology at nV cm^{-1} Hz^{-1/2} levels. Looking forward it points to continuous filling of thousands of atoms, motional-state control, fermionic encodings and logical-qubit architectures as the next steps that would make the platform transformative.

Core claim

Rydberg atoms furnish a unified experimental setting in which the same long-range dipole and van-der-Waals interactions both enable high-fidelity programmable quantum simulation of many-body spin, constrained and topological models in reconfigurable arrays and generate driven-dissipative collective phases—bistability, continuous and discrete time crystals, and self-organized criticality—in thermal ensembles, with direct routes to quantum sensing and computation.

What carries the argument

The Rydberg blockade and resonant dipole-dipole exchange (plus soft-core Rydberg dressing), which map atomic states onto Ising/XY/constrained Hamiltonians in arrays and, under mean-field treatment of the same interactions, produce the nonlinear optical Bloch equations whose bifurcations yield the observed nonequilibrium phases.

Load-bearing premise

Mean-field decoupling and velocity-class averaging remain accurate enough to capture the observed bistability, limit cycles and synchronization in thermal ensembles, even when spatial correlations or quantum fluctuations grow near criticality.

What would settle it

A cold, spatially resolved Rydberg-array experiment that measures local density correlations or entanglement entropy inside a putative limit-cycle or bistable regime and finds them incompatible with the mean-field phase diagram of Fig. 4 would falsify the semiclassical account of the nonequilibrium phases.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review of many-body physics with Rydberg atoms, organized around two complementary settings: (i) programmable quantum simulation of spin and constrained models in reconfigurable atom arrays (van der Waals Ising/PXP, resonant dipolar XY, Rydberg dressing, hybrid digital–analog protocols, LGT and optimization applications), and (ii) driven-dissipative nonequilibrium phases in thermal ensembles (mean-field optical bistability, continuous and discrete time crystals, synchronization, absorbing-state transitions and self-organized criticality). The authors present standard Hamiltonians (e.g. Ising Eq. (1), XY Eq. (2), soft-core dressing Eq. (4), mean-field Bloch equations (6)–(7)), phase diagrams, and a survey of experimental milestones, and close with an outlook on scalability, motional control, fermionic simulation, error mitigation, and metrology.

Significance. If accepted as a synthesis of the current literature, the review is timely and useful. It brings together array-based coherent many-body simulation and ensemble-based driven-dissipative collective dynamics under one framework, which matches how the field has evolved and is of clear interest to quant-ph and AMO communities. Strengths include accurate attribution of experimental milestones (e.g. Bernien 51-atom arrays, Semeghini spin liquid, Carr bistability, recent CTC/DTC and SOC works), standard and correctly stated model Hamiltonians, and a forward-looking outlook that names concrete technological directions (continuous filling, erasure conversion, logical processors, criticality-enhanced sensing). As a literature review rather than a primary-result paper, its value is pedagogical and organizational rather than a new theorem or measurement.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. III.A and Fig. 4: The bipartite mean-field analysis and the UNI/AF/OSC phase diagram are presented as the interpretive backbone for the ensemble experiments. The text correctly notes that full master-equation numerics are limited to N≲10 and that mean-field is motivated by large N and weak correlations, but the review understates how load-bearing this approximation is near the critical and Hopf points that later sections use for metrology and time-crystal claims. A short, explicit discussion of when spatial correlations, velocity-class inhomogeneity, or quantum fluctuations invalidate the fixed-point/Jacobian picture (and pointers to truncated-Wigner or cluster methods already cited) would make the central interpretive claim more robust without changing the narrative.
  2. Abstract and Sec. I claim a “critical survey of experimental techniques for their precise manipulation and observation.” In practice, Secs. II–III are phenomenon- and model-driven; tweezer assembly, mid-circuit transport, EIT readout, velocity selection, and fidelity/error budgets appear only in passing. Either expand a dedicated techniques subsection (or table) that critically compares capabilities and limitations across array vs vapor platforms, or soften the abstract/intro wording so the manuscript’s actual emphasis—models, phases, and milestones—is accurately described.
minor comments (6)
  1. Throughout Sec. III and the embedded figure panels: the extracted manuscript text contains extensive OCR/layout artifacts (e.g. “Vo /l.altume”, fragmented Nature/Science captions, residual latexit blocks). Ensure the production PDF has clean, self-contained figure captions and that reproduced panels are legible at journal size; currently several phase-diagram and transmission figures are hard to parse from the text alone.
  2. Eqs. (6)–(7) and the bipartite reduction: define the sign convention for V_AB (attractive vs repulsive) and the relation n_r = 0.5 − s_z consistently in one place; the phase-diagram caption sets V_AB = −8 without restating units relative to γ and Ω.
  3. Sec. II.B.2 and the t–J–V Hamiltonian (3a–c): the mapping of |↓⟩, |↑⟩, |h⟩ to specific nS/nP states is clear, but a one-line statement of the regime of validity (relative sizes of t_σ, J_⊥, J_z, V versus decay) would help non-specialists.
  4. Sec. IV outlook cites several 2024–2026 arXiv preprints alongside published work. For a review, briefly flag which items are peer-reviewed versus preprint when they support “milestone” language, or group them as “recent developments.”
  5. Notation: ħ ≡ 1 is stated once; thereafter Ω, Δ, γ, V appear both with and without explicit 2π factors in experimental numbers. A short units note (angular vs cyclic frequencies) would reduce ambiguity when comparing theory panels to vapor-cell data.
  6. References: a few parallel reviews are mentioned in the introduction; adding 1–2 standard earlier Rydberg-many-body reviews (beyond Saffman/Browaeys) in the opening would help readers place this synthesis in the literature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: literature review synthesizing external experimental milestones and standard mean-field/Hamiltonian constructions without self-referential predictions or load-bearing self-citation chains.

full rationale

This is an explicit review article whose central claim is a synthesis of the field (Rydberg arrays for programmable Ising/XY/constrained/topological models plus driven-dissipative ensembles for bistability, time crystals, and SOC). Load-bearing content consists of standard model Hamiltonians (transverse-field Ising Eq. 1, dipolar XY Eq. 2, soft-core Rydberg dressing Eq. 4) and textbook mean-field Bloch equations (Eqs. 6–7) whose fixed-point/Jacobian analysis yields the UNI/AF/OSC phase diagram of Fig. 4; these are not fitted to the paper’s own data nor defined in terms of the claimed phases. All experimental milestones (Bernien 51-atom Z_n crystals, Semeghini spin liquid, Carr bistability, Wu/Ding/Wadenpfuhl continuous time crystals, Helmrich SOC, etc.) are attributed to independent groups via ordinary citations. Occasional self-citations (e.g., authors’ prior works on synchronization or metrology) appear among dozens of external references and are not used to justify uniqueness theorems, force ansatze, or convert fits into “predictions.” No derivation reduces by construction to its inputs; the review is self-contained against the external literature it surveys.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review the paper inherits the standard axioms of open quantum systems and Rydberg physics; it introduces no free parameters of its own and invents no new entities. Load-bearing modeling choices (mean-field, two-level reduction, velocity selection) are domain assumptions already used in the cited literature.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Lindblad master equation with local jump operators adequately describes dissipation (spontaneous emission + dephasing) in both arrays and thermal ensembles.
    Used throughout Sec. II and III to write the equations of motion; standard in the Rydberg literature.
  • domain assumption Mean-field factorization of the many-body density matrix is sufficient to locate the UNI/AF/OSC phases and Hopf bifurcations in thermal vapors.
    Explicitly adopted in Sec. III.A to obtain the phase diagrams of Fig. 4; known to neglect correlations that may matter near criticality.
  • domain assumption Rydberg blockade or soft-core dressing maps onto effective spin-1/2 Ising/XY Hamiltonians with the stated interaction forms (C6/R^6, C3/R^3).
    Foundation of all quantum-simulation sections (II.A–II.C); experimentally validated but still an effective low-energy description.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 65388 in / 2162 out tokens · 24376 ms · 2026-07-14T07:28:10.850673+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Rydberg atoms, characterized by their strong and long-range dipole-dipole interactions, provide a versatile platform for exploring intriguing collective and many-body effects. Recently, the experimental realization of these effects in dense ensembles and reconfigurable atomic arrays has attracted significant interest, particularly for applications in quantum simulations and non-equilibrium physics. This review focuses on such recent development, discussing the theoretical foundations of the interactions between Rydberg atoms and the ensuing many-body physics, while providing a critical survey of experimental techniques for their precise manipulation and observation. We further discuss recent breakthroughs in leveraging Rydberg collective effects to probe novel many-body phases and non-equilibrium dynamics of these systems. By synthesizing theoretical insights with experimental milestones, we provide a comprehensive perspective on this rapidly evolving field and its transformative potential for future quantum technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11038 by Cheng Chen, Fan Yang, Weibin Li, Zhengyang Bai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Quantum simulation with Ising-type interactions in Rydberg arrays. (a) Realization of a quantum spin liquid on a Kagome lattice, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Quantum simulation with resonant dipole-dipole interactions in Rydberg arrays. (a) Observation of ferromagnetic and anti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Rydberg quantum simulation with interactions induced in the ground-state manifolds. (a) Realization of an extended Bose-Hubbard [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Rydberg clusters and synchronized oscillations. (A) Rydberg population nr as a function of Δ. When Δ approaches to the resonance, Rydberg population grows and starts to oscillate. (B) Dynamical oscillations of the active atoms (green) are synchronized at late time. The ensemble average (red), taking into account of contributions of the inactive atoms (gray), exhibits a collective oscillation (square box B)… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Floquet driving of nonequilibrium states in a driven-dissipative Rydberg gas. (a) Experimental setup. The probe (red) and FIG3EIT spectra with (top row) and without (bottom row [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Characterizing the nonequilibrium phase transition. (a) Color map of the difference in probe transmission (normalized to the enough to obtain sufficient statistics. Figure4c shows the correspondi iil bbilitditibtiftibtid bbiith pse g p), yq enough to obtain sufficient statisticsFigure4c shows the correspond meters is characterized. (Reproduced with permission and adapted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Don't truncate, decompose: mean-field dynamics of long-range quantum systems from strongly correlated states

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Strongly correlated long-range open quantum systems can be solved exactly by decomposing the initial state into independent mean-field trajectories and averaging.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

176 extracted references · 9 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    conveyor belts

    and as a dominant ionization mechanism in a beam of thermal Sr atoms, but the absence of significant shifts and broadening below ρ ðcÞ rr rules them out as the direct origin of the phase transition. However, even though they have no immediate effect on the spectra, the resulting ions and electrons are crucial for ionization avalanches and plasma formation...

    2020

  2. [2]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum informa- tion with Rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2313 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individ- ually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys.16, 132 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    X. Wu, X. Liang, Y . Tian, F. Yang, C. Chen, Y .-C. Liu, M. K. Tey, and L. You, A concise review of Rydberg atom based quantum computation and quantum simulation, Chin. Phys. B 30, 020305 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    C. Carr, R. Ritter, C. G. Wade, C. S. Adams, and K. J. Weather- ill, Nonequilibrium Phase Transition in a Dilute Rydberg En- semble, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 113901 (2013)

    2013

  6. [6]

    Wadenpfuhl and C

    K. Wadenpfuhl and C. S. Adams, Emergence of Synchroniza- tion in a Driven-Dissipative Hot Rydberg Vapor, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 143002 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    D. Ding, Z. Bai, Z. Liu, B. Shi, G. Guo, W. Li, and C. S. Adams, Ergodicity breaking from Rydberg clusters in a driven-dissipative many-body system, Sci. Adv.10, eadl5893 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature551, 579 (2017)

    2017

  9. [9]

    Lienhard, S

    V . Lienhard, S. de L ´es´eleuc, D. Barredo, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, M. Schuler, L.-P. Henry, and A. M. L¨auchli, Ob- serving the Space- and Time-Dependent Growth of Correla- tions in Dynamically Tuned Synthetic Ising Models with An- tiferromagnetic Interactions, Phys. Rev. X8, 021070 (2018)

    2018

  10. [10]

    Keesling, A

    A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pich- ler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev, P. Zoller, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a programmable Rydberg simulator, Nature568, 207 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quan- tum simulator, Nature595, 227 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    Scholl, M

    P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V . Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. L ¨auchli, and A. Browaeys, Quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hundreds of Rydberg atoms, Nature595, 233 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    de L ´es´eleuc, V

    S. de L ´es´eleuc, V . Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. Weber, N. Lang, H. P. B¨uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Observa- 15 tion of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms, Science365, 775 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kali- nowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science 374, 1242 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´c, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nat. Phys.14, 745 (2018)

    2018

  16. [16]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semegh- ini, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, A. A. Michailidis, N. Maskara, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, M. Serbyn, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti ´c, and M. D. Lukin, Controlling quantum many-body dynamics in driven Rydberg atom arrays, Science371, 1355 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    X. Wu, Z. Wang, F. Yang, R. Gao, C. Liang, M. K. Tey, X. Li, T. Pohl, and L. You, Dissipative Time Crystal in a Strongly Interacting Rydberg Gas, Nat. Phys.20, 1389 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Ding, Z.-K

    D.-S. Ding, Z.-K. Liu, B.-S. Shi, G.-C. Guo, K. Mølmer, and C. S. Adams, Enhanced Metrology at the Critical Point of a Many-Body Rydberg Atomic System, Nat. Phys.18, 1447 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Labuhn, D

    H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, S. Ravets, S. De L ´es´eleuc, T. Macr`ı, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Tunable two-dimensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum Ising models, Nature534, 667 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, I. S. Madjarov, X. Xie, R. Finkelstein, J. P. Covey, J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y . Huang, A. Kale, H. Pichler, F. G. Brand ˜ao, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Prepar- ing random states and benchmarking with many-body quan- tum chaos, Nature613, 468 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    Gonz ´alez-Cuadra, M

    D. Gonz ´alez-Cuadra, M. Hamdan, T. V . Zache, B. Braver- man, M. Kornjaˇca, A. Lukin, S. H. Cant ´u, F. Liu, S.-T. Wang, A. Keesling, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and A. Bylinskii, Ob- servation of string breaking on a (2+1)D Rydberg quantum simulator, Nature642, 321 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    Ga ¨etan, Y

    A. Ga ¨etan, Y . Miroshnychenko, T. Wilk, A. Chotia, M. Viteau, D. Comparat, P. Pillet, A. Browaeys, and P. Grangier, Obser- vation of collective excitation of two individual atoms in the Rydberg blockade regime, Nat. Phys.5, 115 (2009)

    2009

  23. [23]

    Urban, T

    E. Urban, T. A. Johnson, T. Henage, L. Isenhower, D. D. Yavuz, T. G. Walker, and M. Saffman, Observation of Ryd- berg blockade between two atoms, Nat. Phys.5, 110 (2009)

    2009

  24. [24]

    Bombieri, T

    L. Bombieri, T. V . Zache, G. Calliari, M. D. Lukin, H. Pich- ler, and D. Gonz´alez-Cuadra, Deconfined Quantum Criticality on a Triangular Rydberg Array, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 233602 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Verresen, M

    R. Verresen, M. D. Lukin, and A. Vishwanath, Prediction of Toric Code Topological Order from Rydberg Blockade, Phys. Rev. X11, 031005 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Zhang, H

    T. Zhang, H. Wang, W. Zhang, Y . Wang, A. Du, Z. Li, Y . Wu, C. Li, J. Hu, H. Zhai, and W. Chen, Observation of Near- Critical Kibble-Zurek Scaling in Rydberg Atom Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 093403 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Manovitz, S

    T. Manovitz, S. H. Li, S. Ebadi, R. Samajdar, A. A. Geim, S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, H. Zhou, N. U. Koyluoglu, J. Feld- meier, P. E. Dolgirev, N. Maskara, M. Kalinowski, S. Sachdev, D. A. Huse, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Quan- tum coarsening and collective dynamics on a programmable simulator, Nature638, 86 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    H. Kim, Y . Park, K. Kim, H.-S. Sim, and J. Ahn, Detailed Bal- ance of Thermalization Dynamics in Rydberg-Atom Quantum Simulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 180502 (2018)

    2018

  29. [29]

    C. Ates, J. P. Garrahan, and I. Lesanovsky, Thermalization of a Strongly Interacting Closed Spin System: From Coher- ent Many-Body Dynamics to a Fokker-Planck Equation, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 110603 (2012)

    2012

  30. [30]

    A. L. Shaw, Z. Chen, J. Choi, D. K. Mark, P. Scholl, R. Finkel- stein, A. Elben, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Benchmarking highly entangled states on a 60-atom analogue quantum simulator, Nature628, 71 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Liang, Z

    X. Liang, Z. Yue, Y .-X. Chao, Z.-X. Hua, Y . Lin, M. K. Tey, and L. You, Observation of Anomalous Information Scram- bling in a Rydberg Atom Array, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 050201 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Xiang, Y .-W

    D.-S. Xiang, Y .-W. Zhang, H.-X. Liu, P. Zhou, D. Yuan, K. Zhang, S.-Y . Zhang, B. Xu, L. Liu, Y . Li, and L. Li, Observation of quantum information collapse-and- revival in a strongly-interacting Rydberg atom array (2024), arXiv:2410.15455 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    K. Kim, F. Yang, K. Mølmer, and J. Ahn, Realization of an Extremely Anisotropic Heisenberg Magnet in Rydberg Atom Arrays, Phys. Rev. X14, 011025 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    F. Yang, H. Yarloo, H.-C. Zhang, K. Mølmer, and A. E. B. Nielsen, Probing Hilbert space fragmentation with strongly in- teracting Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. B111, 144313 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    L. Zhao, P. R. Datla, W. Tian, M. M. Aliyu, and H. Loh, Obser- vation of Quantum Thermalization Restricted to Hilbert Space Fragments andZ 2k Scars, Phys. Rev. X15, 011035 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    P. R. Datla, L. Zhao, W. W. Ho, N. Klco, and H. Loh, Sta- tistical localization ofU(1) lattice gauge theory in a Rydberg simulator, Nat. Phys.22, 355 (2026)

    2026

  37. [37]

    Y .-X. Chao, P. Ge, Z.-X. Hua, C. Jia, X. Wang, X. Liang, Z. Yue, R. Lu, M. K. Tey, X. Wang, and L. You, Probing False Vacuum Decay and Bubble Nucleation in a Rydberg Atom Ar- ray, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 120407 (2026)

    2026

  38. [38]

    Osterholz, F

    P. Osterholz, F. Bensch, S. Tang, S. B. Sheela, B. Sbierski, I. Lesanovsky, and C. Groß, Collective cluster nucleation dy- namics in quantum magnets (2026), arXiv:2512.04656 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Darbha, A

    S. Darbha, A. Khudorozhkov, P. L. Lopes, F. Liu, E. Rra- paj, J. Balewski, M. Hamdan, P. E. Dolgirev, A. Schuckert, K. Klymko,et al., Probing emergent prethermal dynamics and resonant melting on a programmable quantum simulator, arXiv:2510.11706 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    M. C. Ba ˜nuls, R. Blatt, J. Catani, A. Celi, J. I. Cirac, M. Dal- monte, L. Fallani, K. Jansen, M. Lewenstein, S. Montangero, et al., Simulating lattice gauge theories within quantum tech- nologies, Eur. Phys. J. D.74, 165 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gam- bassi, and M. Dalmonte, Lattice gauge theories and string dy- namics in Rydberg atom quantum simulators, Phys. Rev. X10, 021041 (2020)

    2020

  42. [42]

    Homeier, A

    L. Homeier, A. Bohrdt, S. Linsel, E. Demler, J. C. Halimeh, and F. Grusdt, Realistic scheme for quantum simulation of Z 2 lattice gauge theories with dynamical matter in (2+1) D, Commun. Phys.6, 127 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Cheng and H

    Y . Cheng and H. Zhai, Emergent U (1) lattice gauge theory in Rydberg atom arrays, Nat. Rev. Phys.6, 566 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    Xiang, P

    D.-S. Xiang, P. Zhou, C. Liu, H.-X. Liu, Y .-W. Zhang, D. Yuan, K. Zhang, B. Xu, M. Dalmonte, D.-L. Deng, and L. Li, Real-time scattering and freeze-out dynamics in Rydberg-atom lattice gauge theory, arXiv:2508.06639 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    D. K. Mark, F. M. Surace, T. Schuster, A. L. Shaw, W. Gong, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Observation of ballistic plasma and memory in high-energy gauge theory dynamics, arXiv:2510.11679 (2025). 16

    arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Pichler, S.-T

    H. Pichler, S.-T. Wang, L. Zhou, S. Choi, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum optimization for maximum independent set using Rydberg atom arrays, arXiv:1808.10816 (2018)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    Ebadi, A

    S. Ebadi, A. Keesling, M. Cain, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, D. Blu- vstein, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, J.-G. Liu, R. Samajdar, X.- Z. Luo, B. Nash, X. Gao, B. Barak, E. Farhi, S. Sachdev, N. Gemelke, L. Zhou, S. Choi, H. Pichler, S.-T. Wang, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum optimiza- tion of maximum independent set using Rydberg atom arrays, Sci...

    2022

  48. [48]

    M. Kim, K. Kim, J. Hwang, E.-G. Moon, and J. Ahn, Rydberg quantum wires for maximum independent set problems, Nat. Phys.18, 755 (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    A. Byun, M. Kim, and J. Ahn, Finding the Maximum Inde- pendent Sets of Platonic Graphs Using Rydberg Atoms, PRX Quantum3, 030305 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    Nguyen, J.-G

    M.-T. Nguyen, J.-G. Liu, J. Wurtz, M. D. Lukin, S.-T. Wang, and H. Pichler, Quantum optimization with arbitrary connec- tivity using Rydberg atom arrays, PRX Quantum4, 010316 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    De Oliveira, E

    A. De Oliveira, E. Diamond-Hitchcock, D. Walker, M. Wells- Pestell, G. Pelegri, C. Picken, G. Malcolm, A. Daley, J. Bass, and J. Pritchard, Demonstration of weighted-graph optimiza- tion on a Rydberg-atom array using local light shifts, PRX Quantum6, 010301 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    Bombieri, Z

    L. Bombieri, Z. Zeng, R. Tricarico, R. Lin, S. Notarnicola, M. Cain, M. D. Lukin, and H. Pichler, Quantum Adiabatic Optimization with Rydberg Arrays: Localization Phenomena and Encoding Strategies, PRX Quantum6, 020306 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V . S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee, M. Schuler, A. M. L ¨auchli, M. P. Zaletel, T. Lahaye, N. Y . Yao, and A. Browaeys, Continuous symmetry breaking in a two-dimensional Rydberg array, Nature616, 691 (2023)

    2023

  54. [54]

    Yue, Y .-F

    Z. Yue, Y .-F. Mao, X. Liang, Z.-X. Hua, P. Ge, Y .-X. Chao, K. Li, C. Jia, M. K. Tey, Y . Xu, and L. You, Average topolog- ical phase in a disordered Rydberg atom array, Nat. Phys.22, 844 (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    Zhang, B

    Y .-W. Zhang, B. Xu, Y . Zhou, D.-S. Xiang, H.-X. Liu, P. Zhou, K. Zhang, R. Liao, T. Pohl, W. Li, and L. Li, Observation of non-Hermitian many-body phase transition in a Rydberg-atom array, arXiv: 2512.02753 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    de L ´es´eleuc, D

    S. de L ´es´eleuc, D. Barredo, V . Lienhard, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, Optical Control of the Resonant Dipole-Dipole Interaction between Rydberg Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 053202 (2017)

    2017

  57. [57]

    Bornet, G

    G. Bornet, G. Emperauger, C. Chen, B. Ye, M. Block, M. Bintz, J. A. Boyd, D. Barredo, T. Comparin, F. Mezzacapo, T. Roscilde, T. Lahaye, N. Y . Yao, and A. Browaeys, Scalable spin squeezing in a dipolar Rydberg atom array, Nature621, 728 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    C. Chen, G. Emperauger, G. Bornet, F. Caleca, B. G ´ely, M. Bintz, S. Chatterjee, V . Liu, D. Barredo, N. Y . Yao, T. La- haye, F. Mezzacapo, T. Roscilde, and A. Browaeys, Spec- troscopy of elementary excitations from quench dynamics in a dipolar XY Rydberg simulator, Science389, 483 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    Bornet, G

    G. Bornet, G. Emperauger, C. Chen, F. Machado, S. Chern, L. Leclerc, B. G´ely, Y . T. Chew, D. Barredo, T. Lahaye, N. Y . Yao, and A. Browaeys, Enhancing a Many-Body Dipolar Ryd- berg Tweezer Array with Arbitrary Local Controls, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 263601 (2024)

    2024

  60. [60]

    Emperauger, M

    G. Emperauger, M. Qiao, C. Chen, F. Caleca, S. Bocini, M. Bintz, G. Bornet, R. Martin, B. G ´ely, L. Klein, D. Barredo, S. Chatterjee, N. Y . Yao, F. Mezzacapo, T. La- haye, T. Roscilde, and A. Browaeys, Tomonaga-Luttinger Liq- uid Behavior in a Rydberg-Encoded Spin Chain, Phys. Rev. X 15, 031021 (2025)

    2025

  61. [61]

    Bintz, V

    M. Bintz, V . S. Liu, J. Hauschild, A. Khalifa, S. Chatterjee, M. P. Zaletel, and N. Y . Yao, Dirac spin liquid in quantum dipole arrays (2024), arXiv:2406.00098 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Y .-F. Mao, S. Ma, and Y . Xu, Chiral Spin Liquid in Rydberg Atom Arrays (2026), arXiv:2603.21147 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    Machado, S

    F. Machado, S. Chern, M. P. Zaletel, and N. Y . Yao, A Dipolar Chiral Spin Liquid on the Breathed Kagome Lattice (2026), arXiv:2603.25784 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Bornet, M

    G. Bornet, M. Bintz, C. Chen, G. Emperauger, D. Barredo, S. Chatterjee, V . S. Liu, T. Lahaye, M. P. Zaletel, N. Y . Yao, and A. Browaeys, Dirac Spin Liquid Candidate in a Ry- dberg Quantum Simulator (2026), arXiv:2602.14323 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Geier, N

    S. Geier, N. Thaicharoen, C. Hainaut, T. Franz, A. Salzinger, A. Tebben, D. Grimshandl, G. Z¨urn, and M. Weidem¨uller, Flo- quet Hamiltonian engineering of an isolated many-body spin system, Science374, 1149 (2021)

    2021

  66. [66]

    Scholl, H

    P. Scholl, H. J. Williams, G. Bornet, F. Wallner, D. Barredo, L. Henriet, A. Signoles, C. Hainaut, T. Franz, S. Geier, A. Tebben, A. Salzinger, G. Z¨urn, T. Lahaye, M. Weidem¨uller, and A. Browaeys, Microwave Engineering of Programmable XXZHamiltonians in Arrays of Rydberg Atoms, PRX Quan- tum3, 020303 (2022)

    2022

  67. [67]

    Lienhard, P

    V . Lienhard, P. Scholl, S. Weber, D. Barredo, S. de L´es´eleuc, R. Bai, N. Lang, M. Fleischhauer, H. P. B ¨uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Realization of a Density-Dependent Peierls Phase in a Synthetic, Spin-Orbit Coupled Rydberg System, Phys. Rev. X10, 021031 (2020)

    2020

  68. [68]

    Weber, R

    S. Weber, R. Bai, N. Makki, J. M ¨ogerle, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, M. Daghofer, N. Lang, and H. P. B¨uchler, Exper- imentally Accessible Scheme for a Fractional Chern Insulator in Rydberg Atoms, PRX Quantum3, 030302 (2022)

    2022

  69. [69]

    Ohler, M

    S. Ohler, M. Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, and M. Fleischhauer, Quantum spin liquids of Rydberg excitations in a honeycomb lattice induced by density-dependent Peierls phases, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013157 (2023)

    2023

  70. [70]

    T. Chen, C. Huang, I. Velkovsky, K. R. Hazzard, J. P. Covey, and B. Gadway, Strongly interacting Rydberg atoms in syn- thetic dimensions with a magnetic flux, Nat. Commun.15, 2675 (2024)

    2024

  71. [71]

    T. Chen, C. Huang, I. Velkovsky, T. Ozawa, H. Price, J. P. Covey, and B. Gadway, Interaction-driven breakdown of Aharonov–Bohm caging in flat-band Rydberg lattices, Nat. Phys.21, 221 (2025)

    2025

  72. [72]

    Weckesser, K

    P. Weckesser, K. Srakaew, T. Blatz, D. Wei, D. Adler, S. Agrawal, A. Bohrdt, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Realization of a Rydberg-dressed extended Bose-Hubbard model, Science 390, 849 (2025)

    2025

  73. [73]

    S. J. Evered, M. Kalinowski, A. A. Geim, T. Manovitz, D. Blu- vstein, S. H. Li, N. Maskara, H. Zhou, S. Ebadi, M. Xu, J. Campo, M. Cain, S. Ostermann, S. F. Yelin, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing the Kitaev honeycomb model on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Na- ture645, 341 (2025)

    2025

  74. [74]

    Homeier, Lukas and Harris, Timothy J. and Blatz, Tizian and Geier, Sebastian and Hollerith, Simon and Schollw ¨ock, Ul- rich and Grusdt, Fabian and Bohrdt, Annabelle, Antiferromag- netic Bosonict−JModels and Their Quantum Simulation in Tweezer Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 230401 (2024)

    2024

  75. [75]

    M. Qiao, G. Emperauger, C. Chen, L. Homeier, S. Hollerith, G. Bornet, R. Martin, B. G´ely, L. Klein, D. Barredo, S. Geier, 17 N.-C. Chiu, F. Grusdt, A. Bohrdt, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Realization of a doped quantum antiferromagnet in a Rydberg tweezer array, Nature644, 889 (2025)

    2025

  76. [76]

    M. Qiao, R. Martin, L. Homeier, I. Morera, B. G ´ely, L. Klein, Y . T. Chew, D. Barredo, T. Lahaye, E. Demler, and A. Browaeys, Kinetically-induced bound states in a frustrated Rydberg tweezer array (2025), arXiv:2510.17183 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    K. Chen, Y . Qi, Z. Yan, and X. Li, Double Supersolid Phase in a Bosonict−J−VModel with Rydberg Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 266003 (2025)

    2025

  78. [78]

    Henkel, R

    N. Henkel, R. Nath, and T. Pohl, Three-Dimensional Ro- ton Excitations and Supersolid Formation in Rydberg-Excited Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 195302 (2010)

    2010

  79. [79]

    J. E. Johnson and S. L. Rolston, Interactions between Rydberg-dressed atoms, Phys. Rev. A82, 033412 (2010)

    2010

  80. [80]

    Zeiher, R

    J. Zeiher, R. van Bijnen, P. Schauß, S. Hild, J.-y. Choi, T. Pohl, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Many-body interferometry of a Rydberg-dressed spin lattice, Nat. Phys.12, 1095 (2016)

    2016

Showing first 80 references.