Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 71 references

Quantum Multiscale Modeling: A Hierarchy of Algorithms for Complex Chemical Systems

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Multiscale quantum advantage is decided by how information is transferred between algorithmic layers, not by speedups at any single scale.

desk verdict Solid Perspective that correctly elevates inter-scale composition as the real bottleneck; the primacy-of-interfaces claim is conditional but the authors flag that themselves. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.11217 v1 pith:NLNJYLTL submitted 2026-07-13 quant-ph physics.chem-ph

Seenivasan Hariharan , Kareljan Schoutens , Sachin Kinge , Lucas Visscher This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords quantummultiscalemodelinginter-scalechannelsfault-tolerantalgorithmsheterogeneouscatalysisphaseestimationrandomwalksQSVTcompositionproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Complex chemical systems such as catalysts are governed by physics that spans electronic, atomistic, mesoscopic, and continuum scales. Quantum algorithms already exist for each of those regimes in isolation, but there is no systematic way to chain them so that an advantage earned at one scale still matters at the next. This Perspective maps quantum phase estimation, thermal Hamiltonian simulation, quantum walks on reaction networks, and quantum PDE solvers onto the classical multiscale hierarchy, then shows that the decisive objects are the inter-scale channels that pass information upward. Classical workflows collapse those channels into lossy scalar parameters; the authors ask whether fully quantum, coherent channels can preserve advantage instead. They formalize the problem as six open questions and illustrate it with CO oxidation on platinum, arguing that end-to-end quantum speedup will be governed by the structure of those channels rather than by the performance of any individual subroutine.

What carries the argument

The inter-scale channel I_{k o k+1}: a transformation that takes the quantum state, uncertainty budget, and admissible observables of scale k and produces the inputs for scale k+1, realized either by projective classical measurement or by a coherent CPTP map or quantum instrument.

What would settle it

Construct an explicit end-to-end resource estimate for the four-scale CO/Pt(111) pipeline under both classical-measurement and coherent-channel interfaces; if the coherent version fails to reduce total query complexity below a classical multiscale baseline for any realistic precision target, the central claim is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim that fault-tolerant quantum algorithms for electronic structure, molecular dynamics, mesoscopic kinetics, and continuum reactor physics can in principle be composed into a multiscale pipeline, but that any end-to-end quantum advantage is controlled primarily by the mathematical structure of the inter-scale information channels rather than by the asymptotic cost of the individual scale algorithms.

Load-bearing premise

Each individual quantum subroutine must still deliver its advertised asymptotic advantage on chemically realistic instances; otherwise comparing interface costs is meaningless.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This Perspective maps fault-tolerant quantum algorithms (QPE, Gibbs-state preparation plus Hamiltonian simulation, multidimensional quantum random walks on mass-action graphs, and QSVT-based sparse linear solvers) onto the four classical scales of multiscale chemical modeling (electronic structure, atomistic dynamics, mesoscopic kinetics, continuum reactor PDEs). Using CO oxidation on Pt(111) as a running example, it constructs explicit inter-scale information channels I_{k o k+1}, including a coherent conditional-Gibbs construction (Eqs. 6–9) that avoids intermediate classical measurement. It argues that end-to-end quantum advantage, if any, will be governed primarily by the structure and cost of these channels rather than by isolated single-scale speedups, and formalizes six open questions (Q1–Q6) that define the composition problem. All claims are carefully hedged as conditional on state preparation, QRAM, conditioning, and readout.

Significance. If the framing holds, the paper usefully reorients the quantum-chemistry community from modular algorithm substitution toward the harder problem of coherent (or controlled-lossy) composition across scales. The concrete CO/Pt(111) constructions, the explicit definition of I_{k o k+1} as CPTP maps or instruments, the QSVT-unification suggestion (Q3), and the uncertainty-propagation composition (Eq. 18) supply a clear research agenda. Strengths include the honest “Challenge” rows in Table 1, the explicit post-selection cost of the coherent channel, and the recognition that mean-field mass-action walks discard spatial correlations. These make the Perspective a useful roadmap rather than an over-claim of advantage.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Outlook; Table 1; Q5–Q6] Abstract and Outlook assert that multiscale quantum advantage “is governed primarily by the structure of information transfer between algorithmic layers, rather than by performance at individual scales alone.” This comparative claim is load-bearing yet remains conditional on the single-scale subroutines retaining non-vanishing asymptotic advantages on chemically realistic instances (non-vanishing ground-state overlap for QPE, efficient Gibbs preparation, sub-linear QRAM for the mass-action QRW, well-conditioned Jacobians plus efficient observable extraction for QSVT). Table 1 and the Scale I–IV paragraphs correctly list these as open, and Q5–Q6 restate them, but the primacy-of-interfaces thesis is only meaningful once those advantages are shown to exist. The manuscript should either (i) supply a concrete regime (e.g., a sparse CRN topology or a reactor mesh size) in which interface costs
  2. [Scale III — CO oxidation kinetics; Q5] Scale III / Q5: the multidimensional QRW is defined on the mean-field mass-action system graph, not the full lattice configuration graph. Lateral-interaction parameters ω_{ij} extracted at Scale II therefore enter only through barrier corrections (Eq. 11), losing explicit spatial correlations that classical lattice kMC retains. The text notes that restoring site resolution requires either pseudo-species or new walk constructions, but does not quantify the resulting growth of the state space or the degradation of the spectral gap that underpins the claimed query speedup. Because catalysis on Pt(111) is known to be sensitive to islanding and coverage fluctuations, this loss is not a minor technicality; a short complexity estimate or a statement of the regimes in which the mean-field contraction remains faithful is needed for the composition claim to be credible.
  3. [Scale I — Electronic structure of CO/Pt(111); Eqs. 8–9] Eqs. 8–9 (Scale I o II coherent channel): post-selection on the ancilla succeeds with probability P_succ = ∑ |c_i|² exp(−β ΔẼ^{(i)}), which can be exponentially small in β·spread(ΔE_ads). The text correctly flags the O(1/√P_succ) amplitude-amplification cost, yet still presents the construction as the canonical coherent alternative to projective measurement. For realistic adsorption-energy spreads on Pt(111) (several eV) and catalytic temperatures, this cost can erase any localized QPE advantage before the density matrix even reaches Scale II. A short numerical estimate for a representative energy landscape, or an explicit comparison of total query cost versus measure-and-reprepare, is required to substantiate that the coherent channel is ever preferable.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 1; TOC] Figure 1 caption and the TOC graphic both use the calligraphic I for the channels; the main text switches between I and script-I. Standardize notation.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1 lists “polynomial state preparation speedup” for Scale II Gibbs preparation; the surrounding text is more cautious. Align the table entry with the body.
  3. [Scale III] The arXiv preprint on quantum walks for CRNs (ref. 31) is central to Scale III; a one-sentence statement of which theorems are used (reachability, flux estimation) would help readers who have not yet read that work.
  4. [Throughout] Minor typographical inconsistencies appear in the complexity expressions (e.g., poly log vs. polylog, ∥H∥ vs. ||H||). A single pass for uniformity would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No derivation reduces to its inputs; the paper is a Perspective that maps known algorithms, poses six open questions, and uses one non-load-bearing self-citation for a Scale-III primitive.

full rationale

The manuscript does not claim a numerical prediction, uniqueness theorem, or end-to-end complexity bound that is forced by construction. Its strongest assertion—that multiscale quantum advantage is governed primarily by the structure of the inter-scale channels I_{k→k+1}—is presented as a roadmap and as six explicitly unresolved questions (Table 2, Q1–Q6), not as a derived theorem. The CO/Pt(111) hierarchy (Eqs. 1–13, Fig. 1) is an illustrative compilation of observables, not a fit-then-predict exercise. The sole overlapping-author citation that supplies an algorithmic building block (Hariharan et al., arXiv:2509.07890 for the multidimensional QRW on mass-action graphs) is used only to populate the Scale-III row of Table 1; the composition claim itself does not rest on that citation being true, nor does the paper import a uniqueness result or smuggle an ansatz from prior work by the same authors. No parameter is fitted to data and then re-labeled a prediction. Consequently the derivation chain contains no circular reduction, only ordinary self-citation of a proposed subroutine whose correctness is independent of the multiscale thesis.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper is a Perspective that rests on standard quantum-algorithmic complexity results and on the classical multiscale hierarchy of catalysis modeling. No free parameters are fitted. The main invented entities are the formal inter-scale channels and the six open questions that define the composition problem. Domain assumptions about the existence and conditional advantages of the four cited quantum algorithms are taken from the literature.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption QPE on a qubitized Hamiltonian has query complexity O(||H||/ε) provided a sufficiently good initial state is available.
    Invoked throughout Scale I discussion and Table 1; taken from standard quantum-chemistry literature (Babbush, Lee, Reiher et al.).
  • domain assumption Fault-tolerant Gibbs-state preparation followed by coherent Hamiltonian simulation can extract thermal free-energy barriers and lateral interactions at near-optimal query cost.
    Scale II section; relies on block-encoding and LCU/qubitization results.
  • domain assumption Multidimensional quantum walks on mass-action system graphs, given QRAM, yield query speedups for reachability and steady-state fluxes of chemical reaction networks.
    Scale III; rests on the authors’ prior arXiv and Jeffery–Zur circuit-theory results.
  • domain assumption QSVT-based sparse linear solvers achieve O(polylog(n) κ log(1/ε)) gate complexity for suitably conditioned reactor Jacobians.
    Scale IV; standard QSVT literature (Gilyén et al.).
  • domain assumption Classical multiscale catalysis modeling proceeds by sequential transfer of scalar parameters (energies → rates → coverages → source terms).
    Introduction and Table 1; standard in the heterogeneous-catalysis literature (Reuter, Bruix et al.).
invented entities (2)
  • Inter-scale quantum channel I_{k→k+1}
    purpose: Formal object that carries (possibly coherent) information from the quantum algorithm at scale k to the algorithm at scale k+1; central object of the composition problem.
    Defined in the Introduction and Open Questions section; no independent experimental handle outside the proposed framework.
  • Six open questions Q1–Q6 defining the quantum multiscale composition problem
    purpose: Organize the research agenda around mathematical structure of channels, heterogeneity of boundaries, QSVT unification, uncertainty propagation, end-to-end complexity, and conditions for net advantage.
    Table 2 and surrounding text; the questions themselves are the paper’s primary contribution and are not independently verified claims.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Multiscale Modeling: A Hierarchy of Algorithms for Complex Chemical Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NLNJYLTL

@misc{pith2026260711217,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Multiscale Modeling: A Hierarchy of Algorithms for Complex Chemical Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NLNJYLTL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.11217}
}
read the original abstract

Multiscale modeling of complex chemical systems requires algorithms that operate coherently across electronic, atomistic, mesoscopic, and continuum scales. While quantum algorithms have been proposed for each regime, no systematic framework exists to compose them across scale boundaries. Here, we identify the conditions under which fault-tolerant quantum algorithms might preserve scale-specific quantum advantages. We map quantum phase estimation, Hamiltonian simulation with Gibbs state preparation, quantum random walks, and quantum partial differential equation solvers onto electronic structure, molecular dynamics, mesoscopic kinetics, and continuum reactor physics, respectively. Crucially, these correspondences do not imply unconditional end-to-end quantum advantage; speedups depend heavily on state preparation, memory architectures, matrix conditioning, and classical readout costs. Six unresolved questions define this composition problem, illustrated via a quantum hierarchy for \ce{CO} oxidation over \ce{Pt(111)}. We propose viewing inter-scale transfer as a quantum channel composition problem at the interface of algorithm design and non-equilibrium statistical mechanics, and ask whether information loss at scale boundaries is intrinsic to multiscale modeling or merely a consequence of lossy classical transduction between algorithmic layers. The resulting roadmap suggests that multiscale quantum advantage is governed primarily by the structure of information transfer between algorithmic layers, rather than by performance at individual scales alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11217 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of classical and fault-tolerant quantum workflows across electronic, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    AIChE Journal , volume=

    A Survey of Multiscale Modeling: Foundations, Historical Milestones, Current Status, and Future Prospects , author=. AIChE Journal , volume=. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  2. [2]

    and Andersen, Mie and Reuter, Karsten , title =

    Bruix, Albert and Margraf, Johannes T. and Andersen, Mie and Reuter, Karsten , title =. Nature Catalysis , year =

  3. [3]

    Annals of biomedical engineering , volume=

    Multiscale Modeling in the Clinic: Drug Design and Development , author=. Annals of biomedical engineering , volume=. 2016 , doi=

    2016

  4. [4]

    Nature Materials , volume=

    Mesoscopic and Multiscale Modelling in Materials , author=. Nature Materials , volume=. 2021 , doi=

    2021

  5. [5]

    Accounts of Chemical Research , volume=

    Heterogeneous Catalysis: A Central Science for a Sustainable Future , author=. Accounts of Chemical Research , volume=. 2017 , doi=

    2017

  6. [6]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=

    Multiscale Modelling and Simulation: A Position Paper , author=. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=. 2014 , doi=

    2014

  7. [7]

    Chemical Science , volume=

    Multiscale Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Chemistry , author=. Chemical Science , volume=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  8. [8]

    ACS Physical Chemistry Au , volume=

    A Vision for the Future of Multiscale Modeling , author=. ACS Physical Chemistry Au , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Nature Chemistry , volume=

    Towards the Computational Design of Solid Catalysts , author=. Nature Chemistry , volume=. 2009 , doi=

    2009

  2. [10]

    Modern methods and algorithms of quantum chemistry , volume=

    Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics: Basic Theory and Advanced Methods , author=. Modern methods and algorithms of quantum chemistry , volume=. 2000 , doi=

    2000

  3. [11]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=

    Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulations for Heterogeneous catalysis: Fundamentals, Current Status, and Challenges , author=. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=. 2022 , doi=

    2022

  4. [12]

    First-Principles Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulations for Heterogeneous Catalysis: Concepts, Status, and Frontiers , booktitle =

    Reuter, Karsten , publisher =. First-Principles Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulations for Heterogeneous Catalysis: Concepts, Status, and Frontiers , booktitle =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527639878.ch3 , year =

    doi

  5. [13]

    Catalysis Letters , volume=

    Modeling of the Interactions Between Catalytic Surfaces and Gas-phase , author=. Catalysis Letters , volume=. 2015 , doi=

    2015

  6. [14]

    Science , volume=

    Insights into Current Limitations of Density Functional Theory , author=. Science , volume=. 2008 , doi=

    2008

  7. [15]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=

    Coupled-cluster Theory in Quantum Chemistry , author=. Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=. 2007 , doi=

    2007

  8. [16]

    SC20: International conference for high performance computing, networking, storage and analysis , pages=

    Pushing the Limit of Molecular Dynamics with ab initio Accuracy to 100 Million Atoms with Machine Learning , author=. SC20: International conference for high performance computing, networking, storage and analysis , pages=. 2020 , url=

    2020

  9. [17]

    Journal of computer-aided materials design , volume=

    An Overview of Spatial Microscopic and Accelerated Kinetic Monte Carlo Methods , author=. Journal of computer-aided materials design , volume=. 2007 , doi=

    2007

  10. [18]

    Multiphase Reactive Flows , year=

    Chemical Reactor Modeling , author=. Multiphase Reactive Flows , year=. doi:https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-05092-8 , publisher=

    doi

  11. [19]

    Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling , volume=

    Modeling Heterogeneous Catalysis using Quantum Computers: An Academic and Industry Perspective , author=. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  12. [20]

    Physical Review X , volume =

    Low-Depth Quantum Simulation of Materials , author =. Physical Review X , volume =. 2018 , month =

    2018

  13. [21]

    PRX Quantum , volume =

    Even More Efficient Quantum Computations of Chemistry Through Tensor Hypercontraction , author =. PRX Quantum , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.030305 , url =

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Elucidating Reaction Mechanisms on Quantum Computers , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  15. [23]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1202.5822 , doi=

    Hamiltonian Simulation using Linear Combinations of Unitary Operations , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1202.5822 , doi=

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Theory of Trotter Error with Commutator Scaling , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2021 , dio=

    2021

  17. [25]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Optimal Hamiltonian Simulation by Quantum Signal Processing , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  18. [26]

    2023 , isbn =

    Jeffery, Stacey and Zur, Sebastian , title =. 2023 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3564246.3585158 , booktitle =

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    2025 , eprint=

    Quantum Walks for Chemical Reaction Networks , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  20. [28]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Quantum Algorithm for Linear Systems of Equations , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2009 , doi=

    2009

  21. [29]

    Proceedings of the 51st annual ACM SIGACT symposium on theory of computing , pages=

    Quantum Singular Value Transformation and Beyond: Exponential Improvements for Quantum Matrix Arithmetics , author=. Proceedings of the 51st annual ACM SIGACT symposium on theory of computing , pages=. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3313276.3316366 , year=

    doi

  22. [30]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Linear combination of Hamiltonian simulation for nonunitary dynamics with optimal state preparation cost , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  23. [31]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.19081 , url=

    Utility-scale Quantum Computational Chemistry , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.19081 , url=

  24. [32]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , volume=

    High-order Quantum Algorithm for Solving Linear Differential Equations , author=. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , volume=. 2014 , doi=

    2014

  25. [33]

    PRX Quantum , volume=

    Grand Unification of Quantum Algorithms , author=. PRX Quantum , volume=. 2021 , doi=

    2021

  26. [34]

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , volume=

    Understanding CO Oxidation on the Pt (111) Surface Based on a Reaction Route Network , author=. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , volume=. 2019 , doi=

    2019

  27. [35]

    Nature Communications , volume=

    Resolving Active Species During the Carbon Monoxide Oxidation over Pt (111) on the Microsecond Timescale , author=. Nature Communications , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  28. [36]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , volume=

    The CO/Pt (111) Puzzle , author=. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , volume=. 2001 , doi=

    2001

  29. [37]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Polynomial-time Quantum Algorithm for the Simulation of Chemical Dynamics , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2008 , doi=

    2008

  30. [38]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=

    Preparation of Many-body States for Quantum Simulation , author=. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=. 2009 , doi=

    2009

  31. [39]

    New Journal of Physics , volume=

    Quantum Phase Estimation of Multiple Eigenvalues for Small-scale (noisy) Experiments , author=. New Journal of Physics , volume=. 2019 , doi-=

    2019

  32. [40]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.02940 , doi=

    Quantum Algorithms for Gibbs Sampling and Hitting-time Estimation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.02940 , doi=

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09240 , doi=

    Composing Quantum Algorithms , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09240 , doi=

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14146 , doi=

    Quantum Subroutine Composition , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14146 , doi=

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation , booktitle =

    Brassard, Gilles and H. Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation , booktitle =. 2002 , pages =

    2002

  36. [44]

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume=

    Multiscale embedding for quantum computing , author=. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  37. [45]

    ChemSusChem , volume =

    Melchionna, Michele and Fornasiero, Paolo , title =. ChemSusChem , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202402064 , year =

    doi

  38. [46]

    Chemical Reviews , volume=

    Four generations of high-dimensional neural network potentials , author=. Chemical Reviews , volume=. 2021 , doi=

    2021

  39. [47]

    Chemical reviews , volume=

    Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing , author=. Chemical reviews , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  40. [48]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=

    On the relationship between continuous-and discrete-time quantum walk , author=. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=. 2010 , doi=

    2010

  41. [49]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.09512 , doi=

    Efficient Quantum Algorithms for Simulating Lindblad Evolution , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.09512 , doi=

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    2022 , eprint=

    Assessing requirements to scale to practical quantum advantage , author=. 2022 , eprint=

    2022

  43. [51]

    and Terhal, Barbara M

    Campbell, Earl T. and Terhal, Barbara M. and Vuillot, Christophe , title =. Nature , year =

  44. [52]

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , volume=

    Quantum-centric high performance computing for quantum chemistry , author=. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  45. [53]

    Review of Modern Physics , volume =

    Quantum computational chemistry , author =. Review of Modern Physics , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.92.015003 , url =

    2020 doi

  46. [54]

    npj Computational Materials , volume=

    A general framework for active space embedding methods with applications in quantum computing , author=. npj Computational Materials , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  47. [55]

    Simulated Quantum Computation of Molecular Energies , journal =

    Ala. Simulated Quantum Computation of Molecular Energies , journal =. 2005 , month = sep, publisher =. doi:10.1126/science.1113479 , url =

    2005 doi

  48. [56]

    and Aspuru-Guzik, Alan and O Brien, Jeremy L

    Peruzzo, Alberto and McClean, Jarrod and Shadbolt, Peter and Yung, Man-Hong and Zhou, Xiao-Qi and Love, Peter J. and Aspuru-Guzik, Alan and O Brien, Jeremy L. , title=. Nature Communications , year=. doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 , url=

    doi

  49. [57]

    and Degroote, Matthias and Johnson, Peter D

    Cao, Yudong and Romero, Jonathan and Olson, Jonathan P. and Degroote, Matthias and Johnson, Peter D. and Kieferová, Mária and Kivlichan, Ian D. and Menke, Tim and Peropadre, Borja and Sawaya, Nicolas P. D. and Sim, Sukin and Veis, Libor and Aspuru-Guzik, Alán , title =. Che...

    2019

  50. [58]

    , author=

    More is different: broken symmetry and the nature of the hierarchical structure of science. , author=. Science , volume=. 1972 , publisher=

    1972

  51. [59]

    2010 , publisher=

    Quantum Computation and Quantum Information , author=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  52. [60]

    Physical Review A , volume=

    Quantum Simulation of Partial Differential Equations: Applications and Detailed Analysis , author=. Physical Review A , volume=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  53. [61]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=

    Quantum Algorithm for Linear Differential Equations with Exponentially Improved Dependence on Precision , author=. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  54. [62]

    doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-02-913 ,

    Improved Quantum Algorithms for Linear and Nonlinear Differential Equations , author =. doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-02-913 ,

    2023 doi

  55. [63]

    Nature Communications , volume=

    Evaluating the Evidence for Exponential Quantum Advantage in Ground-state Quantum Chemistry , author=. Nature Communications , volume=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  56. [64]

    ACS Catalysis , volume=

    Machine Learning Potentials for Heterogeneous Catalysis , author=. ACS Catalysis , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  57. [65]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=

    A Foundation Model for Atomistic Materials Chemistry , author=. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  58. [66]

    ACS Omega , volume=

    Systematic Enumeration of Elementary Reaction Steps in Surface Catalysis , author=. ACS Omega , volume=. 2019 , doi=

    2019

  59. [67]

    Nature Catalysis , volume=

    Exploring Catalytic Reaction Networks with Machine Learning , author=. Nature Catalysis , volume=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  60. [68]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=

    How Accurate are Foundational Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials for Heterogeneous Catalysis? , author=. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=. 2026 , doi=

    2026

  61. [69]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Efficient Quantum Algorithm for Dissipative Nonlinear Differential Equations , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2021 , doi=

    2021

  62. [70]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Reliably assessing the electronic structure of cytochrome P450 on today’s classical computers and tomorrow’s quantum computers , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2022 , doi=

    2022

  63. [71]

    Fast Quantum Simulation of Electronic Structure by Spectral Amplification , author =. Phys. Rev. X , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/pb2g-j9cw , url =

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.